Good video. No music, sponsor, intro, outro or e-begging nor do you talk around the point to pad the length. Just a good story with a nature walk in the background.
Finns tonvis med material. Det som brukar ske är att man får samma nivå av kunskap som en enterprise arkitekt. Dvs du vet i teorin hur saker ska fungera men du saknar praktisk kunskap och erfarenhet. Det är relativt vanligt idag att bolag går ifrån den här modellen och sattsar på att anställa utvecklare som har en djupare teknisk bakgrund.
It depends on what we mean with architecture. I am not a big fan of the bureaucracy that some feel is needed but I am a fan of figuring out how to design everything from source up to systems for maximum gains. My idea of fun hasn't changed much tbh. I enjoy figuring out how to solve a complex problem. It doesn't really matter to me if it is in code or some other part of the delivery process. The only sad part is that the scope of what is fun is shrinking the more you learn. More and more you see the same issues and more or less know how to solve them while new problems that requires you to think hard become less common. But when I find one, well I lose all sense of time and forget to eat. The best feeling in the world is when people think something is impossible and you prove that it is not.
Good video. No music, sponsor, intro, outro or e-begging nor do you talk around the point to pad the length. Just a good story with a nature walk in the background.
Absolutely!
Thank you for the talking while walking. I really enjoy the surrounding scene and the natural flow of your talk!
Finns det möjlighet att försöka lära sig exempelvis system arkitekt som junior? Eller behöver man flera års erfarenhet som systemutvecklare?
Finns tonvis med material. Det som brukar ske är att man får samma nivå av kunskap som en enterprise arkitekt. Dvs du vet i teorin hur saker ska fungera men du saknar praktisk kunskap och erfarenhet.
Det är relativt vanligt idag att bolag går ifrån den här modellen och sattsar på att anställa utvecklare som har en djupare teknisk bakgrund.
what is more fun, architecture side of things or just regular coding? or how definition of fun changed(if it did) for you throughout the years?
It depends on what we mean with architecture. I am not a big fan of the bureaucracy that some feel is needed but I am a fan of figuring out how to design everything from source up to systems for maximum gains.
My idea of fun hasn't changed much tbh. I enjoy figuring out how to solve a complex problem. It doesn't really matter to me if it is in code or some other part of the delivery process.
The only sad part is that the scope of what is fun is shrinking the more you learn. More and more you see the same issues and more or less know how to solve them while new problems that requires you to think hard become less common. But when I find one, well I lose all sense of time and forget to eat.
The best feeling in the world is when people think something is impossible and you prove that it is not.