Massimo Vignelli and his 1972 NY Subway map

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 12

  • @trainluvr
    @trainluvr 14 лет назад +1

    No comments, hmm. The map is a masterpiece, though the trunk colors used today are sensible, but the bus transfer info bubbles are an abomination. If you compare the 1979 map to today's you can see a lot of progress, but it is quite busy as Massimo states.

  • @saginawdavis
    @saginawdavis 13 лет назад +2

    @benfortney Exactly. Berlin's map is one of the most frightening things I've seen for two reasons:
    1. No geography whatsoever.
    2. You can only tell the name of a line by tracing it out to its terminal point. There's no legend for color codes,.

  • @lucasdimitri
    @lucasdimitri 13 лет назад

    @Gondring We'll be happy to get the page you are talking about ;)

  • @alberoDiSpazio
    @alberoDiSpazio 6 лет назад

    my hero. Him and Mondrian.

  • @AEMoreira81
    @AEMoreira81 13 лет назад +1

    That map has returned...the MTA, as of today is using it now to explain planned service disruptions.

  • @asia-88
    @asia-88 7 лет назад +3

    A brilliant mind vs. fragmented minds. Who won ?

  • @alberoDiSpazio
    @alberoDiSpazio 6 лет назад

    my hero.

  • @marty177
    @marty177 13 лет назад

    The Sydney rail map has got basic direction. The western suburbs are on the left side of the map, the northern suburbs are at the top and so forth. The layout is the general layout of the city. I think that is enough for people.
    Does the Vignelli NYC map have at least that amount of geography?

  • @europe_trains
    @europe_trains 3 года назад

    Nice

  • @CMSINFAMOUS
    @CMSINFAMOUS 11 лет назад

    This is history

  • @simonbnyc
    @simonbnyc 12 лет назад +1

    Vignelli's map was so much easier to read and understand. The current map is cluttered and confusing with lines going all over the place. It's a design failure. People traveling underground don't need geography. It's irrelevant. Simplicity is the key.