The Old, Infirm Leader Who Resigned for the Good of the Country

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
  • During the early months of the Civil War, it had become clear that Maj. Gen. Winfield Scott was not physically able to manage the rigors of commanding the U.S. Army. Born the year before the U.S. Constitution was written, Scott spent half a century in the army, from the War of 1812 to the Civil War, advising seven presidents and running once, unsuccessfully, for the highest office in the land. In 1861, his Anaconda Plan to squeeze the seceded states economically through blockades and controlling the major rivers proved ahead of its time. But his body was failing and he needed to step aside for the good of the country and younger leadership. Scott lived until 1866-long enough to see the United States triumphant. Here's what happened.
    "Life on the Civil War Research Trail" is hosted by Ronald S. Coddington, Editor and Publisher of Military Images magazine. Learn more about our mission to showcase, interpret and preserve Civil War portrait photography at militaryimagesmagazine.com and shopmilitaryimages.com.
    This episode is brought to you in part by CS Acquisitions, the finest historical antique militaria. See the latest artifacts available for purchase at csacquisitions.com.
    Image: Library of Congress
    This channel is a member of the RUclips Partner Program. Your interest, support, and engagement is key, and I'm grateful for it. Thank you!

Комментарии • 44

  • @brianniegemann4788
    @brianniegemann4788 Месяц назад +17

    Ron, thank you for a timely lesson on how honorable men behave in a crisis. Americans in 1861 believed in honor, integrity, decency, respect and morality. The event of Gen. Scott's retirement, and how it was managed, should remind us how important those values are for today's America.

  • @oleeb
    @oleeb Месяц назад +8

    It’s a shame how few people today really know much of anything about the great Winfield Scott who played such a huge role in the early life of the republic.

  • @TimFrakes
    @TimFrakes Месяц назад +13

    How timely. Your devotion to primary sources cuts through layers of interpretation and gives us a clear window to the past. Thanks for your work.

  • @bat-fq6nl
    @bat-fq6nl Месяц назад +10

    Outstanding video, thanks for sharing our history!

  • @NormsJeanMorrissey
    @NormsJeanMorrissey Месяц назад +7

    Great leader who knew when to step aside in favor of younger men like Grant

  • @trajan75
    @trajan75 Месяц назад +3

    Excellent video. He lived to see the Union preserved and his plan executed.

    • @decimated550
      @decimated550 22 дня назад +1

      That I'm sure gave him the deepest life satisfaction than if he had attempted to command active armies

    • @decimated550
      @decimated550 22 дня назад +1

      Imagine in 2024. If a leader knew that his infirmities prevented him from fully serving his country and stepping down on his own recognizance. Imagine that

  • @petercampbell7962
    @petercampbell7962 Месяц назад +11

    Your choice of focus for this, and for many other videos that you post from time to time, makes the study of history poignantly relevant and meaningful. That you let the past speak for itself in the midst of our current events with so little commentary... this is a lesson in restraint, the mark of a gifted teacher. Thank you. Sincerely.

    • @bigmike4552
      @bigmike4552 Месяц назад +1

      Now to make it really relevant, talk about when a "leader" who was a completely mentally unfit puppet, had propaganda cover for him for 3 years calling anyone who questioned his mental acuity "conspiracy theorist", then when it became too obvious, he was thrown out by his puppet masters , in favor of the unpopular DEI hire replacement he was forced to take on to placate riotous mobs who hate this country. oh and talk about how they denied primary voters any say in the candidate, for the third election cycle in a row (for democracy!)

  • @statmonster
    @statmonster Месяц назад

    Thanks. I had always known he came up with the Anaconda Plan but not what happened to him afterwards. A shame he was not in his prime to lead the Army of the Potomac for the next couple of years.

  • @rutlandfuel2637
    @rutlandfuel2637 Месяц назад +6

    Ol' Fuss and Feathers

  • @rogersheddy6414
    @rogersheddy6414 Месяц назад +3

    I should like to have heard some of his observations during the war, what his last letters or statements contained.

    • @lifeonthecivilwarresearchtrail
      @lifeonthecivilwarresearchtrail  Месяц назад

      You may find his memoirs of interest: www.google.com/books/edition/Memoirs_of_Lieut_General_Scott_LL_D/et5dTcg3fq4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover

    • @statmonster
      @statmonster Месяц назад +1

      Agreed.

  • @oldgeezerproductions
    @oldgeezerproductions Месяц назад +2

    The most esteemed General Scott was fortunate that he had and, what is more, knew that he had a mighty, growing army and an outstanding Federal government with a loyal Congress and perhaps the greatest of all U.S. Presidents, assisted by a highly competent Presidential Cabinet, all of which could take over from him on his retirement and perform those duties necessary to preserve his precious country from a rebellion that sought to destroy it. He had laid the mighty, continent wide foundation for victory and could, in good conscience and relief, hand it to others to complete.

  • @donb7113
    @donb7113 Месяц назад

    My 3x grandfather fought under Scott at the Battle of Lundy Lane near Fort Niagara during the War of 1812. Col. Scott was wounded in that action.
    He was a little perturbed that his name was giving to a distant fort near the Kansas and Missouri border. I believe he deserved a better placement of a fort as well.

  • @johnkeviljr9625
    @johnkeviljr9625 Месяц назад +1

    Was Scott a Major General, or Lieutenant General at retirement? He looks to have three stars on his epaulets. Thank You. Great work.

  • @thomasarcher4034
    @thomasarcher4034 Месяц назад +13

    I believe that we have collectively lost full command of the English language.

    • @petercampbell7962
      @petercampbell7962 Месяц назад +3

      True... And yet, as I noted the length of the sentences in that first report, I could not help but think that there is something to be said for the art of brevity in the convenience of our thoughts. Nonetheless, it certainly is wonderful to hear the English language employed with such skill and such a glorious flourish.

    • @lifeonthecivilwarresearchtrail
      @lifeonthecivilwarresearchtrail  Месяц назад +2

      I have to remind myself that in the mid-19th century written/printed media was the only real option for long distance communications. In this context, choosing precise words and constructing sentences to accurately convey thoughts, instructions, and other information was critical.

    • @Chris-ut6eq
      @Chris-ut6eq Месяц назад +1

      @@lifeonthecivilwarresearchtrail It's an art we have all failed to practice well. Instead we have speech writers who speak for our leaders and those leaders are happy to read other's works as their own.

    • @jimbiddle8646
      @jimbiddle8646 Месяц назад

      Say what?

  • @timothyhartzell7095
    @timothyhartzell7095 Месяц назад +5

    Do you know where the letter to Sec. Cameron is today? My hometown is Lewisburg Pa. where he lived for some time. His brother James house is the home to the Milton Pa historical society. Col. James Cameron was one of the first officers in the US Army killed in the civil war.

  • @bertvosburg558
    @bertvosburg558 22 дня назад

    Every one in America had the sense of doing everything for the good of the country. I think Scott hung on long enough to see the country stay UNITED hence why he passed in 1866. Not that long ago I must add as my Great Grandfather was born that year and he bought the Farm that I still live and farm on 110 years after he purchased it.

  • @williamrossetter9430
    @williamrossetter9430 Месяц назад +6

    Ron, my first impression is how our dear countrymen on average cannot speak good English. Stories like this are evidence of this fact. Regardless, Winfield Scott did so much for the USA and this story is well received! Thank you!

    • @markfrumkin3230
      @markfrumkin3230 Месяц назад

      Before you complain about others you should look in a mirror. Proper English NOT good English. Maybe a little more schooling than you have might help.

  • @rijrunner
    @rijrunner Месяц назад +1

    For my money, Scott is the greatest general in US history

  • @michaelzivanovich2061
    @michaelzivanovich2061 Месяц назад +2

    The Harrisburg Telegraph getting some play...bravo!

  • @danielkitchens4512
    @danielkitchens4512 Месяц назад +2

    Hey Ron, did Soctt and Lee ever reconnect after the war?

    • @lifeonthecivilwarresearchtrail
      @lifeonthecivilwarresearchtrail  Месяц назад +2

      I did not find any references to them making context in the short period of time between Appomattox and Scott's passing in 1866. Further research needed!

  • @bigmike4552
    @bigmike4552 Месяц назад +2

    Halftime ended July 13 2024

  • @johnt8441
    @johnt8441 Месяц назад +1

    The Anaconda probably beat the Confederacy all by itself.

  • @yisroelkatz-xj6pq
    @yisroelkatz-xj6pq Месяц назад +3

    Too bad we don't have generals like this today, who are not Woke! !

    • @rlsiler8663
      @rlsiler8663 23 дня назад

      You have been lied to again! Our military officers and ncos are far superior in every way than any other country in the world!

  • @cgrable8342
    @cgrable8342 Месяц назад +2

    ...and he staved off a military conflagration with Britain in "The Great Pig War" in 1859.

  • @glenhensley4467
    @glenhensley4467 Месяц назад +1

    I may have misunderstood th date but Lincoln died in 1865 how could he have been there in 1866 must have been Johnson