Hello Turget, nice video. I don't get why natting internal LAN traffic over an IPSec tunnel should improve security (apart from the obvious need in case of overlapping networks). Even without NAT IPSec traffic is handled at the FG level that can do any kind of L3/L7 firewalling. Am i missing something? Thanks!
Hello Turget, nice video. I don't get why natting internal LAN traffic over an IPSec tunnel should improve security (apart from the obvious need in case of overlapping networks). Even without NAT IPSec traffic is handled at the FG level that can do any kind of L3/L7 firewalling. Am i missing something? Thanks!