*Interesting note:* Even Einstein was mistaken on length contraction. He had said that a sphere would look like an ellipsoid. However, Penrose later proved that a sphere would still be spherical, although rotated. Notice in the simulation how the spheres are the only objects that don't look distorted when moving at near light speeds!
Traffic Police: Sir, You run the red light. Scientist: No, I saw it as Green because of doppler effect. Traffic Police: Understandable, here is your 178758000km/hr speeding ticket.
So... You're faster than light? You can only live in total darkness if you start travelling during the Big Bang... Otherwise, it'll be a long time before you get to the edge / boundary of light... and then you'll be living in darkness.
Everything depends, i think that comment he made was misused. Like the guy said above here, trees doesn't move, yet that there are ones that live hundreds of years, turtles are another good example, there are athletes that die young from any reason, so everything DEPENDS
The "stretching out" part perfectly explains what happens to the stars in "warp speed" in sci fi movies like Star Wars. The stars get "stretched" to thin lines outside the ship's windows.
Hyperspace and warp speed are totally wrong. At warp 10 it would take just under half a year to get to the nearest star. All the stars in the sky would bunch up, moving forwards, none being seen out the rear windows or side-rear windows. All the stars would be in side windows or in front windows. And they would all be either red or blue, except a few that were shining into your side windows, which would still be white.. But, keep in mind, the stars in your side windows had just bunched up, and had been behind-and-to-the-side just before you hit the hyperdrive button. So, the only white stars would be the ones you are traveling away from at a very specific angle. And only that angle.
Interestingly, if you lived on planet far away from Earth, and then moved with speeds near speed of light or even faster¹, you'd feel like you're time-warping into the future, and if you did the exact opposite and looked at Earth, it would appear to you you moved back in time.
@@MultiPleaser "At warp 10 it would take just under half a year to get to the nearest star". Warp 10 in Star Trek does NOT mean 10 times the speed of light. Most trekkies say that warp 10 translates to 1000 times the speed of light. Around 36 hours to the nearest star.
The point is, your speed actually stays the same, only the light slows down. You actually take the same amount of time to move from A to B no matter what the speed of light is. But it does not appear so from your perspective.
Its relativistic space time dilation, not increased velocity. Remember, he is always moving at 2 meters per second throughout the whole game. He is decelerating light, not accelerating himself. So the contraction of space creates an acceleration like effect where distances that took 5 seconds to travel start to take 4 seconds then 3 seconds, so on so forth. The space between himself and his destination is contracting as the speed limit of the universe decreases, bending the rules of relativity into a more observable state.
Here's one way to understand why things seem to get farther/longer at high speeds: Normally your eyes only catch light coming from a certain direction in front of you. But as you go faster, your eyes can catch up and intercept light that would normally be outside your file of view. So imagine that your eye is a bucket with its opening facing forward, and light photons are pellets being fired all around you. At rest, the only pellets that can enter the bucket are the ones in front. But if you move fast enough, you can outpace pellets that are traveling sideways, or even ones that are coming from an angle behind you, so your bucket can catch more pellets from a wider angle. If we go back to thinking about light: this is why the camera seems to zoom out when moving forward. Your eyes can now catch light coming from angles to the side, or even behind you.
Ha, I wish. It's really because a change in FOV presents an illusion of moving faster. If you disable that effect, you can see that speed potions or even sprinting just aren't all that fast-seeming without the FOV change.
I would be terrible at moving close to the speed of light... I got terribly seasick/motion-sick watching the video.. Really informative and amazingly interesting topic. Thank you for uploading it, I like the way you can explain hard to grasp concepts in a digestible manner
in a few minutes with a simple exercise you have helped me understand doppler shift in light better than any abstract description of it could ever hope to. you are doing gods work
@@MrMegaMetroid 1. But it implies a belife in fictional deities. 2. Yes sure. Let's use putin as your example. He believes he wants war with the Ukraine. Its killed thousands, crippled the Russian economy and may cause a great depression. An idiot would say "let people belive what they want" 3 we all have a duty to the truth. If you grow up, I'd be delighted to hear from you.
@@pipthewarrior3738 it totally disproves genisis as told incorrectly by the bible so that 3 or more religions testimony of creation blown put of the water. It gives a valid and logical expectation for chemical evolution from star formation to planet formation to biology and the emergence of life plus evolution and speciation has been proven. You wanna brush up on yours sciences that's been done by people doing "gods will" plus you are months late here. The debate died. If your god needed you to speak here, you would have been guided here months ago.
Yeah I was so surprised he didn’t just show the millennium falcon just travel through space, seeing all the stars turn into white lines in a tunnel. Quick and easy way to visualize that effect.
Actually, all sci fi movies have it totally wrong, epecially Star Trek and Star Wars. Firstly, you would rarely pass a star. The space ships never travel very far at all. Secondly, all the stars would move forwards, towards the direction of travel. They would bunch up, with none behind you.. And they would all change to blue or red, except for the few stars whose light is coming from a slight angle from the side, those would stay white. The sky would just sit there for many years not changing yntil you reached the closest star, about 3 months after you hit the "warp speed" button, or went into hyperspace. Boring-ass movie, though.
@@MultiPleaser "The space ships never travel very far at all" Have to consider fiction part of sci fi. Considering if spaceship does move that quick that it reaches stars. How would it change?
Lol yeah Vsauce is also really good at that. I kinda thought and knew about some things Michael says and i was mind blown when i found out i was right but i found they were questions many people asked
I once played a game about a velocirraptor that changed the speed of light to 3m/s and it was really interesting. It explained weird relativistic effects, but in a third person camera. You could do cool things like keeping a powerup more time than you should or passing between fast moving platforms with time dillation, slipping between really close bullets, moving so that two different coloured objects appear the same to you because of Doppler effect, etc. Nice video!
@@basedguns8218 yes he would looks like in slow motion But I m talking about how he will see things and if the way in this video he can't move without crashing ..
Seriously, you are explaining such a difficult concept in such a simple way! I am a Physicist, specialised in sciences of the matter, and I love your channel that I discovered like a week ago. I tend to understand concepts and idea, and have no idea how how to explain it in an understandable way to someone with no science background. And you do that so skillfully! Great job! I will talk about your channel a lot around me.
Flash is fast. Faster than Superman. But his speed doesn't even come close to speed of light. I rather think about how the cameraman can film flash when he runs
@@nowaayy_ In a comic, flash can go 300 trillions of time the speed of light but that's without taking into acount space contraction. He would still go at atleast 99,99999999999... % of the speed of light though.
@@nowaayy_ No, DC is right, it's just the guy that calculated the speed didn't take into account the space contraction. The speed wasn't written in the comic
Yes, with speed of light at 2 m/s, even a mirror would have one second latency when viewed from 1 meter away. However, assuming the universe works according to the same rules otherwise, your brain would have equally high latency so you wouldn't notice it.
@@MikkoRantalainen ok thanks for the info. One more thing, when we look at the Sun, aren't we seeing it in the past? I mean the Sun is so far away from Earth that it takes 8 minutes and 30 seconds for light to reach us. So does that mean we are looking the Sun 8 minutes and 30 seconds in the past? If this is true, then everything we are seeing is in the past right? Even if it is 0.001 seconds?
@@pinkpanther1139 Yes, the light that comes from the sun was emitted over 8 minutes ago. The distance from the Earth to the Sun is not constant so the delay changes a bit over a year. Most of the things are close enough to your eyes that the time delay due speed of light is not meaningful compared to your senses and brain performance.
That last bit made me think about that feeling of vertigo you get in dreams; you know, when you try to run forward, but the thing in front of you goes away. And then I start thinking about how in a dream, years can pass within the six hours of a night's sleep. Kinda sounds like time dilation to me. What if people already subconsciously know how time dilation and the speed of light work
Nah, it's more because our brain doesn't actually know how much time passes, the "life" you live there is hella shortened, you won't have those 18 years of school and 60 of work where everyday you wake up and all that shit, it "feel" like a lifetime, kinda how playing for 4 hours could feel like 2 and studying for half an hour could feel like 3 hours
@@gandalf8216 dreams are not false memories. They are simulated realities that help consolidate real memories and create real memories of these simulated experiences too. They can become more "false" in the process of dream memory recollection after waking up, but that's another thing.
9:40 me a gamer: there is no lengthening going on here, his fov is just increasing as he moves holy shit i leave this for 4 months forget that the video even exists and then get a notification and there are like 500 likes wtf
@@themanofiron785 he said when you move closer to the speed of light, the time slow down. So that mean when you have same speed to the speed of light, that mean all time completely stopped, even the foton or the light stopped.
I love his videos I'm not going to lie lol reason I love watching them as soon as they drop is it might be something else I can learn more from. I've learned so much just by seeing his videos. Thank you very much for educating someone like myself!!! Please never stop making content!! 👍👍👍✌️
Length contraction occurs only along the line of travel - only in one dimension of space - while the other two dimensions are unaffected. That is why it looks like a wide angle lens/fisheye[stretched](looking forward) and telephoto/zoom[collapsed](looking backward). Imagine approaching the speed of light in all 3 spatial dimensions - an expanding sphere... The surface of which is C^2. The thickness of the spherical shell is a given mass. As the sphere expands the shell becomes thinner & thinner as mc^2 is constant. In other words you are expanded at c^2 & converted into pure energy - pure light! I've always wondered what is happening to the radius of said expanding sphere. Is the rate at which the radius is expanding reducing over time? Does the rate of the size of the radius converge on a limit? Is that gravity? The integral of the surface area of a sphere is 8*Pi*r (from 4*Pi*r^2) - so over time 8*Pi*g*T... (where r is replaced by g) Unreferenced general relativity[sketchy in my memory]. Objects are rotated 90deg because Time and light are oriented 90deg from the other 3 spatial dimensions(which are each themselves 90deg to each other). As V approaches C then the angle moves from 0 to 90 ...sqrt[1-(V/C)^2]... a simplified portion of the Lorentz transform that acts like a tangent to the angle... and is 0 for length contraction & undefined (1/0) for time dilation when v=c. I see it as the escape velocity of the 4d space-time. It fits well on the surface of a sphere... At v=c the tangent at 90deg then escapes the boundaries of 4d space-time - one spatial dimension(direction of travel) becomes 0 while time reaches eternity. I analogize it to a disc of whole space[in 2d] at all time - infinite - appearing like a vinyl record or CD/DVD. To 'play' reality in 4d is the stylus in the record groove or laser reading the DVD back. One can see the whole of eternity on a disc but can only experience 4d space-time at vc creates a 4d space-time inversion(singularity at v=c then inverse expansion to [4d]' or inverse space-time [space-time]'). Is there an inversion velocity that makes v=0 look like v=c? That is, is there a velocity v where |v|
It's a lie in star wars. If you could move near at the speed of light in space, stars would not look like lines, because they are too far from you. But when you get closer to a star like we are relatively close to Sun, maybe you would feel this effect I think.
For some reason..this is actually scary to experience..
Год назад+6
Length contraction is something happening in coordinate frames. But if we look at something, the speed of light and the distances come into the game. Let's say two events happen at the same time at different distances. Coordinates (t,x,y,z) will tell that these two happened simultaneously, but not our eyes. Further will be seen later than the closer one. Nice video!
For understanding the Doppler effect in real life, I use sound - for example, when riding on a train and going past crossing bells at speed, or if a vehicle with sirens goes past, et cetera. The pitch audibly changes between coming towards you and going away.
You can also use it in smaller examples: for instance, if you want to test a dog wistle, all it takes is for you to ride a bike away from it and you will start hearing it. It's also when an ambulanse is near you, you hear it loud and high-pitched, but as it passes you sound gets quieter and lower.
3rd person view of the 4th dimension travel. Gonna make a big steppy or normal steps stretched out and really fast. Lol this is a fun thought you've started.
Another example of the Doppler effect is when you are by a race track, the cars driving really fast as they go towards you, you can hear the engines at a higher pitch. Then, when they drive past you, the sound gets lower. Because the racecar is closer to the speed of sound, the same applies to light
It's because the sound waves get shorter as the car approaches so it sounds higher (the sound is the same length from the car's perspective but from yours it gets higher because more sound waves keep hitting you so it appears to be higher) and they get longer as it moves away so it sounds lower
Funny how every episode starts with that line, yet virtually every episode of The Flash features some OTHER person who's faster than Barry, completely debunking the headline claim of being the "fastest man alive"..
@@tenwholebees the show very occasionally gives a value like "mach 5" and then two episodes later he runs across a desert in half a second or something stupid. In the first episode he dodges *lightning.* never expect consistency out of comic book characters. Or any form of logic at all for that matter.
@@alansmithee419 Obviously consistency in long-running comic book characters is a difficult thing to expect especially for characters with such a long run (pun unintended) in their series. It depends on which iteration of the Flash, which flash (Barry, Wally, etc...) and which media did they come from (TV Show, Animation, Movie, comics, written literature and etc...) However, depending on which Flash we are talking about, they do make an effort to have consistency in their work.
I have had this question ever since I realized the stars we are looking at are actually light waves finally reaching our eyes from however many m(b)illion years ago. Obvious theoretical question: If you look directly at the surface of a planet (looking at trees, water, lava, some weird fish frog, etc.) in a distant galaxy, and you travel directly to it, without ever breaking direct visible contact, would you being seeing time as "sped up"? The light reflected off the planet, and into whatever advanced machine that could ever bring in that amount of light and allow this to be possible, is essentially just a timeline in which you would be travelling through. How much would the speeds of which we are travelling effect what is being observed? How fast would you need to go to see things as sped up? If you could travel faster than the speed of light, what would happen if you went the opposite direction? Could you perceive time on that planet as reversed?
To answer the first set of questions, you would absolutely perceive the events occurring on that planet as though they were sped up. This would pronounced at any relativistic speeds, so anywhere in that .7c-.9999c range. We could do the calculations to determine just how fast those events would unfold before your eyes, but to simplify, imagine you are travelling towards some planet a lightyear away at 99.99% the speed of light. To an outside observer, you will reach that planet in approximately a year and some change; however, to you, that trip takes only about five days. Yet in those five days, a year's worth of events occurs on the planet towards which you are travelling. As for the second set of questions, it's difficult to say how one might perceive the universe when travelling past the speed of light, our mathematical models fall apart at that point. That said, if you were to move away from that same planet from earlier at near the speed of light, you would still counterintuitively perceive that it was sped up, because time dilation doesn't care about about direction. That said, where when travelling towards that planet it would appear brighter and bluer, moving away it would appear redder and dimmer. Interestingly, and where this all becomes rather confusing, is that the light itself, those photons with the information we're looking at, will always be perceived as moving at the speed of light, regardless of how fast or in what direction we are moving. As an example, let's say that in the very first second of your trip, when you are going 99.99% the speed of light towards the hypothetical planet, if you were to broadcast a radio signal to that planet to tell them of your arrival, they would receive that broadcast three and half days before you arrive and not a second sooner. Although that broadcast was sent from your ship going near the speed of light, it would never gain any additional velocity, and both you and those who received that message would agree about exactly how fast it travelled even though you would disagree about the amount of time it took or the distance it travelled Edit: I was incorrect about the moving backwards hypothetical
@@eclatdeepurer5894 Socrates hit on this a long time ago. Sight requires three things. The thing to be seen, a thing that sees, and a mediator between the two.
imagine being a kid in school, been put into groups and given this game. then told to study the effects and use your own research to explain the different effects at different speeds? 🤯🤯 what a way to learn!
Wouldn't it be absolutely awesome if someone made a puzzle-solving adventure game that involved manipulating this 'light-slowing' effect as a core game mechanic? Using it to see invisible colours, alter your relative speed, and see things at different angles or from different perspectives (like writing that was stretched out and illegible until you walked backwards to compress it). You could even have NPCs that get old and die as you use the ability more.
"Sir, do you know why I've stopped you?" "I don't know officer, was I going too fast?" "No, too slow. You were doing 2m/s in a 300,000km/s area." I'd really love to see that happen!
When nearing the speed of light, 1. What you see is not real 2. what you hear is not real 3. what you feel is not real (electric impulse transfer rate in our body is also near to light speed) 4. The time your body experiences is not real. What is real, is "you" at that moment. When you think about it carefully, doesn't it sounds like limit to the processing power of a "simulation"?
I love this, it's amazing to get to see concrete visualisations of these very abstract concepts. But I was wondering how come we don't see any difference in the movement of the ghost-people, shouldn't they be stretched/squished/rotated/blueish/redish as they move when you're still?
The notion of having a fixed speed through spacetime so increasing speed through space mandates decreased speed through time was just... I mean... Wow. I never thought of it that way before.
Idk if you’ve ever heard of the game devil daggers but it’s mechanics are basically what you talk about in this video, I can’t explain it well enough atm but it would be awesome if you did a video on it
How is that even possible. Nobody told you to take a red thing or a blue thing before ? Or is it more complex than this? How did you figure it out. What do you experience watching this video. Can you elaborate please? Its interresting
Colour blindness means they can't see some colours, but speed of light only shifts the existing colours in the visible spectrum. The colour blind people can also see colour shift in their colours.
Well you do see the doppler effect and everything get super stretched when dio says “Za warudo, Toki wo tomare” and when jotaro says “Star Platinum, Za warudo”
When I saw the stretching, the first thing I thought was: FOV increased. And the reason I thought was (I hope this makes sense): When light hits a thing, it is reflected everywhere. If I stand still and look at something, I see the light it reflects directly towards to me. But if I move at nearly speed of light, that light goes way behind me and instead I see the light that was reflected more forwards. Therefore I see the object at my side when it is already behind me. From my viewpoint, light that was reflected parallel to the direction of my movement comes always at a slight angle, no matter my speed, because I move closer to the line those photons move along. The faster I move, the greater the effect. At speed of light I move as much as photons, so I see things directly at my side at 45 degree angle in front of me. And things at 45 degree angle behind me seem to be next to me. The faster I go, the further behind me I can see, but seeing full 360 degrees would never be possible. I hope this makes sense but I am afraid it doesn't... As a finnish high school student, I am not sure if my english is good enough to explain my thoughts 😅
As time slows down, you're seeing more and more distant past, hence if you travelled in space you see objects as you saw them from increasingly previous point of your travel. hence the stretch which seems actually pretty straightforward.
It makes me wonder, too, if we see into the past but light takes x number of years to reach us, would we be seeing the past or catching up to the present?
The Forever War has been my favourite sci-fi novel ever since I read it as a young kid in the early 90's. I've been continuously disappointed by almost all sci-fi disregarding relativity as inconvenient to the plot instead of incorporating the consequences as part of the story telling. Would you mind expanding on the premise of your novel as you've really piqued my interest?
@@beardedchimp Thanks for your interest! Unfortunately that novel is one of two that I was developing simultaneously, and I decided to put it on hold because the other one was more promising. However, I've not abandoned it so I might pick it up again afterwards. The scenario isn't fully accurate and was meant to be a description of a spectacle really. It's about how a star might look if you passed close by it while using a warp drive. I hadn't fully figured out the distortion and spectral effects but this video gave me some ideas for research avenues. For example, I described the star as having coloured bands like an Easter egg, and being "flattened" into an egg shape at one end - but after seeing this video I began to wonder if that was the opposite of what you might see. Of course, warp drive is speculative anyway so there is some "wriggle room". Anyway, the other book isn't done yet but I'm happy with how it's going so I'm guessing that if either of them gets published it will be the other one, and my "Easter egg" star idea will have to wait.
Moving in reverse was the only concept I came into this with. Makes sense that everything would be perceived as the same size and squished because that would be the last reference of light you get from the object at that distance.
"what it would look like is that everything becomes spagettified out really long. The closer you get to the speed of light, the more stretched out everything gets infront of you and also the faster it seems you're getting to each place". Sooooo basically the hyperspace from star wars is actually very scientifically correct?
Both yes and no: +) Yes, this is how it would appear to you -) they forgot about Doppler Effect, making everything appear violet -) you don't need constant output of energy to sustain constant speed. -) there is no possibility for any energy-based engine to exceed speed of light -) even with 10x the speed of light, travelling through space would still take a long time. For example, if you used such warp drive to move from Earth to Proxima Centauri star (the closest one we know), it would take you just under 5 months.
@@Admiral45-10 They do travel in hyperspace for extended periods of time, though. You'll catch some episodes where all they're doing is traveling through hyperspace while some story plays out on the ship.
I think you made kind of a mistake, you see the speed limit c is not about speed of light, c is a constant of the universe and photons are few of the particles who can travel at that speed due to them having zero rest mass. So what you did(imagined to do) is bring the speed limit from the value of c to 2m/s.
*Interesting note:* Even Einstein was mistaken on length contraction. He had said that a sphere would look like an ellipsoid. However, Penrose later proved that a sphere would still be spherical, although rotated. Notice in the simulation how the spheres are the only objects that don't look distorted when moving at near light speeds!
Nicely explained 👍👍
Haah, nice try, you still aren't getting my liver.
I thought Einstein was always right.
@@vaibhavshukla2353 lol.. reality is not a fairy tale. Being in the field of science means being wrong many times.
Who KnOws
Traffic Police: Sir, You run the red light.
Scientist: No, I saw it as Green because of doppler effect.
Traffic Police: Understandable, here is your 178758000km/hr speeding ticket.
😂
I told my dad this joke when I was a kid, after he had explained Hubble to me, and got a ticket a few days later.
200
Nice joke!
You mean 178758km/s? :D
"The only downside in being faster than light, is that you must live in the darkness"
-Sonic Capable Hedgehog
Heh
@Blue Silver or can you, convert to pure energy and then convert back
So... You're faster than light?
You can only live in total darkness if you start travelling during the Big Bang... Otherwise, it'll be a long time before you get to the edge / boundary of light... and then you'll be living in darkness.
@@muhammadtahaali614 latom
when you sarcasm is too advanced
The problem of moving faster than light, is that you can only live in Darkness
"If you want to live longer you have to move more"
Turtles: Are you challenging me?
It's relative 😀
Yoo man most realistic and challenging comments
Even the turtles move but A Banyan tree never, yet it lives much longer
@Prince Kashyap what if the banyan tree moves, but it moves the earth along with it?
Everything depends, i think that comment he made was misused. Like the guy said above here, trees doesn't move, yet that there are ones that live hundreds of years, turtles are another good example, there are athletes that die young from any reason, so everything DEPENDS
The "stretching out" part perfectly explains what happens to the stars in "warp speed" in sci fi movies like Star Wars. The stars get "stretched" to thin lines outside the ship's windows.
I always thought they got length contraction wrong when I saw this effect, but it turns out they were right all along!
Hyperspace and warp speed are totally wrong.
At warp 10 it would take just under half a year to get to the nearest star.
All the stars in the sky would bunch up, moving forwards, none being seen out the rear windows or side-rear windows. All the stars would be in side windows or in front windows.
And they would all be either red or blue, except a few that were shining into your side windows, which would still be white..
But, keep in mind, the stars in your side windows had just bunched up, and had been behind-and-to-the-side just before you hit the hyperdrive button.
So, the only white stars would be the ones you are traveling away from at a very specific angle. And only that angle.
Warp speed was in Star TREK
You said WARS
Interestingly, if you lived on planet far away from Earth, and then moved with speeds near speed of light or even faster¹, you'd feel like you're time-warping into the future, and if you did the exact opposite and looked at Earth, it would appear to you you moved back in time.
@@MultiPleaser "At warp 10 it would take just under half a year to get to the nearest star". Warp 10 in Star Trek does NOT mean 10 times the speed of light. Most trekkies say that warp 10 translates to 1000 times the speed of light. Around 36 hours to the nearest star.
“ if you’re moving close to the speed of light it appears as if you can get from point a to point b faster than normal” ...well yeah
The point is, your speed actually stays the same, only the light slows down.
You actually take the same amount of time to move from A to B no matter what the speed of light is. But it does not appear so from your perspective.
Its relativistic space time dilation, not increased velocity. Remember, he is always moving at 2 meters per second throughout the whole game. He is decelerating light, not accelerating himself. So the contraction of space creates an acceleration like effect where distances that took 5 seconds to travel start to take 4 seconds then 3 seconds, so on so forth. The space between himself and his destination is contracting as the speed limit of the universe decreases, bending the rules of relativity into a more observable state.
@@g59enjoyer48 I was making a joke but that’s actually helpful
Ah, I am very literal at times 😅 I'm glad it helped your understanding though! I had trouble with this video at first, its very confusing
*the speed of light is slowed down to walking speed*
Here's one way to understand why things seem to get farther/longer at high speeds:
Normally your eyes only catch light coming from a certain direction in front of you. But as you go faster, your eyes can catch up and intercept light that would normally be outside your file of view.
So imagine that your eye is a bucket with its opening facing forward, and light photons are pellets being fired all around you. At rest, the only pellets that can enter the bucket are the ones in front. But if you move fast enough, you can outpace pellets that are traveling sideways, or even ones that are coming from an angle behind you, so your bucket can catch more pellets from a wider angle.
If we go back to thinking about light: this is why the camera seems to zoom out when moving forward. Your eyes can now catch light coming from angles to the side, or even behind you.
This is a good explanation.
Underrated comment
This is really good example,,,,,
Wow, you made a great analogy
brilliant
Day 135 of quarantine: The Action Lab has turned into a gaming channel.
xDD
lmao
🤣
No plz no
New video: "Filling the oceans with doritos and mountain dew - Aquatic animals now gaming animals"
This explains why when you drink a speed potion or sprint in Minecraft your screen zooms out.
It's the same in some other games too. For example Goat Simulator, When you have a suger rush your screen zooms out a whole lot.
and when you use /effect to give yourself speed 255, you screen becomes extremely distorted.
TBH it's more about mimicking the effect stimulants do to you.
Holy ducking shit
Ha, I wish. It's really because a change in FOV presents an illusion of moving faster. If you disable that effect, you can see that speed potions or even sprinting just aren't all that fast-seeming without the FOV change.
So basically when you move you become a thermal camera and a UV detector
And we gain an increased fov
@@wyvernyx and you gain a speed boost
@Wacky Venky when you think about that, it's _hot_
I would be terrible at moving close to the speed of light... I got terribly seasick/motion-sick watching the video.. Really informative and amazingly interesting topic. Thank you for uploading it, I like the way you can explain hard to grasp concepts in a digestible manner
Good thing you probably wont have to 😅
@@TjallieBrrr yeah hah
The universe would be infinitely flat, and time would be infinitely fast relative to you.
@@TjallieBrrr probably? 😰
So fitting that the put giant mushrooms in it.
Giant mushroom? Maybe it's friendly!
Thats what i was thinking! The mit programmers def like phycidelics
Wtf did you even say?? So good your English is 🤣🤣
But they’re chimneys! 🤪🍄
@@kodakincade8063 Literally "they" is the only word that had a typo.
"Walking at near speed of light"
What if you started running instead?
😂
Kaboom
Voxel Music yes kaboom
@@VoxelMusic yes kaboom
@@pobretaoricasso6769 HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA- (a few days later) AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
jesus christ this game looks like a huge acid trip
who needs drugs when u could just play this in vr
Yes. Quite.
And notice how the MIT included giant mushrooms for decor lol.
One pill makes you larger and one pill makes you small...
Ye
in a few minutes with a simple exercise you have helped me understand doppler shift in light better than any abstract description of it could ever hope to. you are doing gods work
God is fictional
@@jameskeelinggaming2319 1:its a figure of speech and doesnt mean someone believes in God
2: let people believe what they want
@@MrMegaMetroid 1. But it implies a belife in fictional deities. 2. Yes sure. Let's use putin as your example. He believes he wants war with the Ukraine. Its killed thousands, crippled the Russian economy and may cause a great depression. An idiot would say "let people belive what they want"
3 we all have a duty to the truth. If you grow up, I'd be delighted to hear from you.
@@jameskeelinggaming2319 3: science doesn't prove or disprove creationism or atheism.
@@pipthewarrior3738 it totally disproves genisis as told incorrectly by the bible so that 3 or more religions testimony of creation blown put of the water. It gives a valid and logical expectation for chemical evolution from star formation to planet formation to biology and the emergence of life plus evolution and speciation has been proven. You wanna brush up on yours sciences that's been done by people doing "gods will" plus you are months late here. The debate died. If your god needed you to speak here, you would have been guided here months ago.
So... the artistic vision of hyperspeed in sci-fi movies was actually true ? This is mind blowing.
Yeah I was so surprised he didn’t just show the millennium falcon just travel through space, seeing all the stars turn into white lines in a tunnel. Quick and easy way to visualize that effect.
Yeah or the uss enterprise, my mind was blown that all of that was an accurate representation of light speed
tbh i think the effect in movies represents motion blur
Actually, all sci fi movies have it totally wrong, epecially Star Trek and Star Wars.
Firstly, you would rarely pass a star. The space ships never travel very far at all.
Secondly, all the stars would move forwards, towards the direction of travel. They would bunch up, with none behind you.. And they would all change to blue or red, except for the few stars whose light is coming from a slight angle from the side, those would stay white.
The sky would just sit there for many years not changing yntil you reached the closest star, about 3 months after you hit the "warp speed" button, or went into hyperspace.
Boring-ass movie, though.
@@MultiPleaser "The space ships never travel very far at all"
Have to consider fiction part of sci fi.
Considering if spaceship does move that quick that it reaches stars. How would it change?
This guy is literally showing the things that I've always wanted to know but never knew cause I thought I'm dumb.
I too have an average IQ
Lol yeah Vsauce is also really good at that. I kinda thought and knew about some things Michael says and i was mind blown when i found out i was right but i found they were questions many people asked
You're not dumb. The only dumb person is the one who has no desire to learn!
@@Jay_in_Japan people who aren't able to speak are also dumb 😏
@@Jay_in_Japan Truest thing I've heard in a bit, dumb people don't value knowledge, which that itself, is quite dumb.
"Honey, come here."
"I can't, I'm collecting orbs to slow down the speed of light."
"My parents aren't home."
*Moves at the speed of light*
Kusogaki but it was actually normal speed because he slowed it down.
think you mean ,"i'm already here"
Lol.
*in walking speed*
My parents aren't home hmmmmm
Understandable
I once played a game about a velocirraptor that changed the speed of light to 3m/s and it was really interesting. It explained weird relativistic effects, but in a third person camera. You could do cool things like keeping a powerup more time than you should or passing between fast moving platforms with time dillation, slipping between really close bullets, moving so that two different coloured objects appear the same to you because of Doppler effect, etc.
Nice video!
Will be interesting that effects in a videogame with speedsters, like Flash, Superman, Ben10 XLR8, Silver Surfer, Sonic, etc..
@@pilarrosanas5085 yeah, i thought of Flash too, but for movies. They show none of it, just freeze frame
What was the name of the game?
Oh yeah I remember that game.
I always struggled with the colour puzzles on that game
So is that how "The Flash" see things when running? Interesting..
No that means no one can move at the speed of light without crashing
@@castleold19 but the faster u go the slower time is for you. So he whoud look like he's in slow motion
@@basedguns8218 yes he would looks like in slow motion
But I m talking about how he will see things and if the way in this video he can't move without crashing ..
@@castleold19 by using the speed force
@@basedguns8218 thats something new
What it is?
"Honey, come up! Dinner's ready!"
"Later, I'm busy collecting orbs to slow down the speed of light."
"Does this dress make me look fat?"
"When walking toward you at near light speed, you actually look smaller."
@@bloemundude underrated
They eat upstairs?
@@bobbytheferret6809 There's a possiblity that they may be in a basement, or literally any floor below the 1st.
,,Sorry I couldn't come here faster, honey, but speed of sound is just 340m/s"
I love how this guy gets right to the point in such a friendly way. Just human, not pretentious or obnoxious at all. Breath of fresh air👍🏼
Mormons are nice people. Yes he's Mormon I grew up in the same Ward as him in Utah.
5:16 The concept of 'time slowing down' was explained so easily and well.
amzing
Seriously, you are explaining such a difficult concept in such a simple way!
I am a Physicist, specialised in sciences of the matter, and I love your channel that I discovered like a week ago.
I tend to understand concepts and idea, and have no idea how how to explain it in an understandable way to someone with no science background.
And you do that so skillfully!
Great job! I will talk about your channel a lot around me.
So according to this flash would be colorblind
Good point😂😂😂😂
Flash is fast. Faster than Superman. But his speed doesn't even come close to speed of light. I rather think about how the cameraman can film flash when he runs
@@nowaayy_ In a comic, flash can go 300 trillions of time the speed of light but that's without taking into acount space contraction. He would still go at atleast 99,99999999999... % of the speed of light though.
@@josenobi3022 I didn't know that it's noted in comics. Then DC must watch this video it's nonsense😂😂.
@@nowaayy_ No, DC is right, it's just the guy that calculated the speed didn't take into account the space contraction.
The speed wasn't written in the comic
You’re like Vsauce without the philosophy lessons.
orr... is he?
@@KISHORENEDUMARAN i was about to reply this " Is He ?" part XD
@@DragPlix or is he?
@@DragPlix or were you?
@@C.y.c.l.o.n.e yes he is.. or may be?
Thanks! 😉
So if i was standing 1 meter away from a mirror, would i see myself one second in the past?
i don't know, no one have try it before
@@Gus_Fringus Yeah, i think they should try it..
Yes, with speed of light at 2 m/s, even a mirror would have one second latency when viewed from 1 meter away. However, assuming the universe works according to the same rules otherwise, your brain would have equally high latency so you wouldn't notice it.
@@MikkoRantalainen ok thanks for the info. One more thing, when we look at the Sun, aren't we seeing it in the past? I mean the Sun is so far away from Earth that it takes 8 minutes and 30 seconds for light to reach us. So does that mean we are looking the Sun 8 minutes and 30 seconds in the past? If this is true, then everything we are seeing is in the past right? Even if it is 0.001 seconds?
@@pinkpanther1139 Yes, the light that comes from the sun was emitted over 8 minutes ago. The distance from the Earth to the Sun is not constant so the delay changes a bit over a year. Most of the things are close enough to your eyes that the time delay due speed of light is not meaningful compared to your senses and brain performance.
Great work!
no
@@diamante8864 ??
@@diamante8864 ??
@@diamante8864 ??
@@diamante8864 ??
"Active people live longer."
**Me, laying in bed for the past 3 hours*:*
deD
deD
deD
deD
deD
That last bit made me think about that feeling of vertigo you get in dreams; you know, when you try to run forward, but the thing in front of you goes away. And then I start thinking about how in a dream, years can pass within the six hours of a night's sleep. Kinda sounds like time dilation to me. What if people already subconsciously know how time dilation and the speed of light work
Nah, it's more because our brain doesn't actually know how much time passes, the "life" you live there is hella shortened, you won't have those 18 years of school and 60 of work where everyday you wake up and all that shit, it "feel" like a lifetime, kinda how playing for 4 hours could feel like 2 and studying for half an hour could feel like 3 hours
Dreams are just false memories, though. So don't think of it as a representation of reality, think of it as a representation of memory recall.
@@entiretotalityofwhateverexists yea, its not like it happens exactly the way time would dilate. its rather random
@@gandalf8216 Actually, dreams are modifying the algorithm in your brain and doing probability checks like a neural net.
@@gandalf8216 dreams are not false memories. They are simulated realities that help consolidate real memories and create real memories of these simulated experiences too. They can become more "false" in the process of dream memory recollection after waking up, but that's another thing.
9:40 me a gamer:
there is no lengthening going on here, his fov is just increasing as he moves
holy shit i leave this for 4 months forget that the video even exists and then get a notification and there are like 500 likes wtf
BHAHAHAHHA
12:24
Also me, a gamer: oh no, anyway *continues gaming *
Just like minecraft
Lmao I was about to say the same thing because that's what it looks like when you have your fov to the max setting.
I was thinking of Minecraft as I was watching the videos more towards the end
This game alternative title: LSD simulator
i actually played this game the second time i dropped acid
@Jon Do btw, there is a game called LSD simulator I'm pretty sure, it's on playstation 1
What if LSD's real effect is to actually speed you up to near light speed?
Aise Are you on LSD lmao
@@AiseStyle i think other people would notice lol
So that’s why when I rush in Minecraft, my FOV increases.
ItsMoses I thought about the same thing😆 so maybe?....
My boi steven is pretty fast then🤣
It’s kinda to give you a feeling of speed but yeah, that makes a bit of sense. But it’s mostly for the feeling of speed
pretty reasonable
I knew it reminded me of something
Do you imagine a complete videogame with this mechanics? With enemies, puzzles, bosses...
That would be so innovative ✅
I think it would be a good fit for a racing game. Race spaceships around a course out in space at relativistic speeds.
@@Roxor128 Problem is that it would be impossible to agree on who crossed the finish line first :D
Man if the flash was epileptic
Hes gonna have a bad time
*[Megalovania intensifies]*
@@gillesfou er e er er ee ee ee ee er
Flash had DownSyndrome.
You feel ur vibrations crawling up ur back...
He WOULD* have a bad time.
But good joke...
This game is more difficult to understand than the actual principle in physics.
Not unless you paid attention in school
Latency is the key word here.
@@Jay-cq5qr I didn't pay attention, but I somehow got it.
@@rizwan6387 Explain, please.
@@Jay-cq5qr I didnt i payed attention here tho
The problem of being faster than light, is that you can only live in darkness
Not true, if you run into light then you can see it
@@themanofiron785 But eventually, you'll absorb all the photons in front and around you. Without new ones being produced, you'll live in darkness.
@@comradepeter87 If the universe is not infinite, if it's infinite than there's always more photos coming your way.
Don’t worry guys he was just making a sonic meme
@@themanofiron785 he said when you move closer to the speed of light, the time slow down. So that mean when you have same speed to the speed of light, that mean all time completely stopped, even the foton or the light stopped.
its so cool how the length contraction looks exactly like what a dolly-zoom/vertigo effect looks like in movies
So is no one going to talk about how eerie this game is
It’s like an lsd trip or something
Bro u right
No
Nah its just bad textures and weird light
Really not that spooky... Tons of games that infinitely scarier, or "eerie" as you put it
Length contraction caution label: Warning; objects MUCH closer than they appear.
colorful objects RAPIDLY APPROACHING
Me: doesn't understand anything
Also me: watches it till the end
Same 😅 He explained it pretty well but I was still like - I dont get it 👁👄👁
Well, I think this kind of topics (advanced for me) need to be chewed and digested properly so that it can be understood.
Yeah I had to watch some parts 3-4 times to understand properly
Same
Right
I love his videos I'm not going to lie lol reason I love watching them as soon as they drop is it might be something else I can learn more from. I've learned so much just by seeing his videos. Thank you very much for educating someone like myself!!! Please never stop making content!! 👍👍👍✌️
Light speed
Expectation: ultra fast movement
Reality: dolly zoom
This feels like giving yourself hyper speed in Minecraft
YES
Maybe they knew done about this and decided to add a real physics aspect to the game.
This just shows how weird our universe could act
Has mushrooms
Length contraction occurs only along the line of travel - only in one dimension of space - while the other two dimensions are unaffected. That is why it looks like a wide angle lens/fisheye[stretched](looking forward) and telephoto/zoom[collapsed](looking backward). Imagine approaching the speed of light in all 3 spatial dimensions - an expanding sphere... The surface of which is C^2. The thickness of the spherical shell is a given mass. As the sphere expands the shell becomes thinner & thinner as mc^2 is constant. In other words you are expanded at c^2 & converted into pure energy - pure light! I've always wondered what is happening to the radius of said expanding sphere. Is the rate at which the radius is expanding reducing over time? Does the rate of the size of the radius converge on a limit? Is that gravity? The integral of the surface area of a sphere is 8*Pi*r (from 4*Pi*r^2) - so over time 8*Pi*g*T... (where r is replaced by g) Unreferenced general relativity[sketchy in my memory].
Objects are rotated 90deg because Time and light are oriented 90deg from the other 3 spatial dimensions(which are each themselves 90deg to each other). As V approaches C then the angle moves from 0 to 90 ...sqrt[1-(V/C)^2]... a simplified portion of the Lorentz transform that acts like a tangent to the angle... and is 0 for length contraction & undefined (1/0) for time dilation when v=c. I see it as the escape velocity of the 4d space-time. It fits well on the surface of a sphere...
At v=c the tangent at 90deg then escapes the boundaries of 4d space-time - one spatial dimension(direction of travel) becomes 0 while time reaches eternity. I analogize it to a disc of whole space[in 2d] at all time - infinite - appearing like a vinyl record or CD/DVD. To 'play' reality in 4d is the stylus in the record groove or laser reading the DVD back. One can see the whole of eternity on a disc but can only experience 4d space-time at vc creates a 4d space-time inversion(singularity at v=c then inverse expansion to [4d]' or inverse space-time [space-time]').
Is there an inversion velocity that makes v=0 look like v=c? That is, is there a velocity v where |v|
In the near future:
"Hello everyone, today I'm going to pour an ocean into the sun to see if it goes out"
GrayStillPlays: "Write that down, write that down!"
@@omegaotaku1342 noice i also watch graystillplays
@@PoggersFloppa noice i also watch graystillplays
@@parzingtheasian ok nice. you watch lets game it out? its pretty much same as graystillplays
@@PoggersFloppa noice I also watch let's game it out
So that is why stars look like lines in Star Wars through hyperspace 😯
Exactly
And also in Doraemon 😅
It's a lie in star wars. If you could move near at the speed of light in space, stars would not look like lines, because they are too far from you. But when you get closer to a star like we are relatively close to Sun, maybe you would feel this effect I think.
Imagine if there was a slight miscalculation in the jet’s system and they crash into a planet at the speed of light
Yess thts what i m thinking watching the whole video
For some reason..this is actually scary to experience..
Length contraction is something happening in coordinate frames. But if we look at something, the speed of light and the distances come into the game. Let's say two events happen at the same time at different distances. Coordinates (t,x,y,z) will tell that these two happened simultaneously, but not our eyes. Further will be seen later than the closer one. Nice video!
0:03 "if we slow down the speed of the universe"
**Enrico Pucci has joined the conversation**
and just like that i have been spoiled
@@someguyinjeans5273
No
@@someguyinjeans5273 No
more like the opposite
@@someguyinjeans5273 no
"In normal life we dont see this at all"
Yea, tell that to every acid trip ever lol
LMFAO 😂🤣
We've seen The magenta fábric off reality
Haha 😁
Alternative title: SUPER COLD Time moves only when you are not moving
I'm glad that I wasn't the only one that thought of this.
Slightly chilly
super hot moment
Astronaut: ,,Finally, my 10 year trip near the speed of light is over!"
Someone on Earth: *it's been 84 years*
What parents think we watch: fun silly videos
What we actually watch:
Oh really
@@sabitamahela Yes mommy
@@mypowerlevelisover9000 I am son
English is not my main language .. so imagine listening at this while trying to understand English.. my brain just fucked up in 10 minutes 😂😂
Ahhhhh
Ehhhhh
Ohhhhh
Ihhhhh
hhhhh
For understanding the Doppler effect in real life, I use sound - for example, when riding on a train and going past crossing bells at speed, or if a vehicle with sirens goes past, et cetera. The pitch audibly changes between coming towards you and going away.
You can also use it in smaller examples: for instance, if you want to test a dog wistle, all it takes is for you to ride a bike away from it and you will start hearing it. It's also when an ambulanse is near you, you hear it loud and high-pitched, but as it passes you sound gets quieter and lower.
Your videos are excellent. And you explain difficult concepts in a way that makes it easier to understand. You are the best!
Would love to see different perspective with stationary observer looking at you while doing this simulation.
3rd person view of the 4th dimension travel. Gonna make a big steppy or normal steps stretched out and really fast. Lol this is a fun thought you've started.
I was waiting to see that too. Like a side by side split screen or something
Another example of the Doppler effect is when you are by a race track, the cars driving really fast as they go towards you, you can hear the engines at a higher pitch. Then, when they drive past you, the sound gets lower. Because the racecar is closer to the speed of sound, the same applies to light
Oh shit you're right!
It's because the sound waves get shorter as the car approaches so it sounds higher (the sound is the same length from the car's perspective but from yours it gets higher because more sound waves keep hitting you so it appears to be higher) and they get longer as it moves away so it sounds lower
I wonder if it's possible to have a "photonic boom" similar to a sonic boom but with an object going at the speed of light instead of sound
@@jbh759 i wonder how we'd ever observe something like that, since anything that travels at c must be massless.
You don't need to be going very fast to hear a Doppler shift--can be done biking past a church bell.
me, going at the speed of light
my view : *_quake pro_*
Quake pro plus swiftness 2
69 likes nice
@@ixb14priyanshuraj75 next : 420 likes
At first, I thought your videos were clicked but on getting into more of your content, it is truly high-quality stuff, kudos mate
this explains why when they use the warp drive in star wars the stars suddenly zoom out.
This explains why when you drink a speed potion or sprint in Minecraft your screen zooms out.
Lol that’s the first thing I thought too
The Flash: "My name is Barry Allen, and I'm the fastest man al- *what the hell am I looking at?* "
Funny how every episode starts with that line, yet virtually every episode of The Flash features some OTHER person who's faster than Barry, completely debunking the headline claim of being the "fastest man alive"..
@@SteveFrenchWoodNStuff he says man, not frikin anti matter or other dimensionly beings
I’m only slightly familiar with The Flash vicariously. How fast does he move? And do the comics or show ever depict it?
@@tenwholebees the show very occasionally gives a value like "mach 5" and then two episodes later he runs across a desert in half a second or something stupid.
In the first episode he dodges *lightning.* never expect consistency out of comic book characters. Or any form of logic at all for that matter.
@@alansmithee419 Obviously consistency in long-running comic book characters is a difficult thing to expect especially for characters with such a long run (pun unintended) in their series. It depends on which iteration of the Flash, which flash (Barry, Wally, etc...) and which media did they come from (TV Show, Animation, Movie, comics, written literature and etc...)
However, depending on which Flash we are talking about, they do make an effort to have consistency in their work.
Light: I am the fastest
One who comments 'FIRST': HOLD MY BEER
FIRST to comment on your comment
LOL 😂
First lmao 😂
summer vacation: hold my beer
@@yakoubdehbi3147 corona: *sounds delicious* 😈
@@researchers7998 First to reply to your comment 😂
I have had this question ever since I realized the stars we are looking at are actually light waves finally reaching our eyes from however many m(b)illion years ago. Obvious theoretical question: If you look directly at the surface of a planet (looking at trees, water, lava, some weird fish frog, etc.) in a distant galaxy, and you travel directly to it, without ever breaking direct visible contact, would you being seeing time as "sped up"? The light reflected off the planet, and into whatever advanced machine that could ever bring in that amount of light and allow this to be possible, is essentially just a timeline in which you would be travelling through.
How much would the speeds of which we are travelling effect what is being observed? How fast would you need to go to see things as sped up? If you could travel faster than the speed of light, what would happen if you went the opposite direction? Could you perceive time on that planet as reversed?
That is actually mind blowing. Amazing how you can perceive a distant object at different states of time, but the object itself is in the "present".
To answer the first set of questions, you would absolutely perceive the events occurring on that planet as though they were sped up. This would pronounced at any relativistic speeds, so anywhere in that .7c-.9999c range. We could do the calculations to determine just how fast those events would unfold before your eyes, but to simplify, imagine you are travelling towards some planet a lightyear away at 99.99% the speed of light. To an outside observer, you will reach that planet in approximately a year and some change; however, to you, that trip takes only about five days. Yet in those five days, a year's worth of events occurs on the planet towards which you are travelling.
As for the second set of questions, it's difficult to say how one might perceive the universe when travelling past the speed of light, our mathematical models fall apart at that point. That said, if you were to move away from that same planet from earlier at near the speed of light, you would still counterintuitively perceive that it was sped up, because time dilation doesn't care about about direction. That said, where when travelling towards that planet it would appear brighter and bluer, moving away it would appear redder and dimmer.
Interestingly, and where this all becomes rather confusing, is that the light itself, those photons with the information we're looking at, will always be perceived as moving at the speed of light, regardless of how fast or in what direction we are moving. As an example, let's say that in the very first second of your trip, when you are going 99.99% the speed of light towards the hypothetical planet, if you were to broadcast a radio signal to that planet to tell them of your arrival, they would receive that broadcast three and half days before you arrive and not a second sooner. Although that broadcast was sent from your ship going near the speed of light, it would never gain any additional velocity, and both you and those who received that message would agree about exactly how fast it travelled even though you would disagree about the amount of time it took or the distance it travelled
Edit: I was incorrect about the moving backwards hypothetical
@@eclatdeepurer5894 Socrates hit on this a long time ago. Sight requires three things. The thing to be seen, a thing that sees, and a mediator between the two.
This is the only channel, i have seen in whole youtube.which talks and illustrates about these interesting things . Seriously !!!
Light goes
BRRRRRRR
RRRRRRR
RRRRRR
RRRRR
RRRR
RRR
RR
R
I want to see a passerby’s perspective
YESOMG
@@whi2gan It will probably look like flash but literally destroying the surroundings wherever he goes
Imagine slowing down the speed of light so much that you can see gamma rays with your bare eyes.
This is very useful for visual learning. I’ve always wanted to be able to experience lightspeed ever since I saw it in Star Wars. Really cool.
why you collecting 100 orbs to get that effect when you can just smoke 2 joints?
Couldn't understand a thing except you'll live longer if you're active
Lol
And not for the reason you thought
imagine being a kid in school, been put into groups and given this game. then told to study the effects and use your own research to explain the different effects at different speeds? 🤯🤯 what a way to learn!
Wouldn't it be absolutely awesome if someone made a puzzle-solving adventure game that involved manipulating this 'light-slowing' effect as a core game mechanic? Using it to see invisible colours, alter your relative speed, and see things at different angles or from different perspectives (like writing that was stretched out and illegible until you walked backwards to compress it). You could even have NPCs that get old and die as you use the ability more.
Im tripping already nt
IIRC there's a game called Velocity Raptor that kinda has this concept you should totally check it out
"Sir, do you know why I've stopped you?"
"I don't know officer, was I going too fast?"
"No, too slow. You were doing 2m/s in a 300,000km/s area."
I'd really love to see that happen!
when we get to the point of being able to move in hyperspace as easily as people do in Star Wars that could be possible
Autobahn practice, space edition ;D
When nearing the speed of light,
1. What you see is not real
2. what you hear is not real
3. what you feel is not real (electric impulse transfer rate in our body is also near to light speed)
4. The time your body experiences is not real.
What is real, is "you" at that moment.
When you think about it carefully, doesn't it sounds like limit to the processing power of a "simulation"?
Dark Shade the world is a matrix
Just go fast as fuck and you'll survive the game.
You nailed it!
No, everything is still as real as it can get, you're just not used to the way you perceive reality in that case
Also what you feel is just the same
The action lab explaining everything in 5 year: 3.98M subs
Beacon cream just playing minecraft in 5 year: 5M SUBS
Other people: *play this game for science*
Me: *plays it cuz I want dem colored melons*
I love this, it's amazing to get to see concrete visualisations of these very abstract concepts. But I was wondering how come we don't see any difference in the movement of the ghost-people, shouldn't they be stretched/squished/rotated/blueish/redish as they move when you're still?
i think it's just a filter and not an actual calculation
This video finally made both time dilation and relativity make sense. Thank you.
The notion of having a fixed speed through spacetime so increasing speed through space mandates decreased speed through time was just... I mean... Wow. I never thought of it that way before.
Still bogus.
Idk if you’ve ever heard of the game devil daggers but it’s mechanics are basically what you talk about in this video, I can’t explain it well enough atm but it would be awesome if you did a video on it
Most people: i wanna go as fast as the speed of light
Action lab: i want light to go as the speed of me 😂
🤣🤣🤣
That moment when someone didn't know that he/she was color blind but actually realized they are from this video explaining the speed of light.
Huh
Wait.. what. are you saying you just found out you're color blind?
How is that even possible. Nobody told you to take a red thing or a blue thing before ? Or is it more complex than this? How did you figure it out. What do you experience watching this video. Can you elaborate please? Its interresting
Colour blindness means they can't see some colours, but speed of light only shifts the existing colours in the visible spectrum. The colour blind people can also see colour shift in their colours.
I am color blind. :E but I could see the difference between red-shift and blue-shift. I don't think anyone is red-blue color blind
i imagine if this is what dio and jotaro sees in stopped time
Well you do see the doppler effect and everything get super stretched when dio says “Za warudo, Toki wo tomare” and when jotaro says “Star Platinum, Za warudo”
4:48 literally looks like a Virtual Boy game 😂
When I saw the stretching, the first thing I thought was: FOV increased. And the reason I thought was (I hope this makes sense):
When light hits a thing, it is reflected everywhere. If I stand still and look at something, I see the light it reflects directly towards to me. But if I move at nearly speed of light, that light goes way behind me and instead I see the light that was reflected more forwards. Therefore I see the object at my side when it is already behind me.
From my viewpoint, light that was reflected parallel to the direction of my movement comes always at a slight angle, no matter my speed, because I move closer to the line those photons move along. The faster I move, the greater the effect. At speed of light I move as much as photons, so I see things directly at my side at 45 degree angle in front of me. And things at 45 degree angle behind me seem to be next to me. The faster I go, the further behind me I can see, but seeing full 360 degrees would never be possible.
I hope this makes sense but I am afraid it doesn't... As a finnish high school student, I am not sure if my english is good enough to explain my thoughts 😅
I like this
As time slows down, you're seeing more and more distant past, hence if you travelled in space you see objects as you saw them from increasingly previous point of your travel. hence the stretch which seems actually pretty straightforward.
It makes me wonder, too, if we see into the past but light takes x number of years to reach us, would we be seeing the past or catching up to the present?
No
RUclips algorithm still trying to educate me after i finished my finals, interesting
I appreciate the info about the Terrell effect - thanks! You just helped make a novel I'm working on more realistic :)
The Forever War has been my favourite sci-fi novel ever since I read it as a young kid in the early 90's. I've been continuously disappointed by almost all sci-fi disregarding relativity as inconvenient to the plot instead of incorporating the consequences as part of the story telling. Would you mind expanding on the premise of your novel as you've really piqued my interest?
@@beardedchimp Thanks for your interest! Unfortunately that novel is one of two that I was developing simultaneously, and I decided to put it on hold because the other one was more promising. However, I've not abandoned it so I might pick it up again afterwards. The scenario isn't fully accurate and was meant to be a description of a spectacle really. It's about how a star might look if you passed close by it while using a warp drive. I hadn't fully figured out the distortion and spectral effects but this video gave me some ideas for research avenues. For example, I described the star as having coloured bands like an Easter egg, and being "flattened" into an egg shape at one end - but after seeing this video I began to wonder if that was the opposite of what you might see. Of course, warp drive is speculative anyway so there is some "wriggle room". Anyway, the other book isn't done yet but I'm happy with how it's going so I'm guessing that if either of them gets published it will be the other one, and my "Easter egg" star idea will have to wait.
Moving in reverse was the only concept I came into this with. Makes sense that everything would be perceived as the same size and squished because that would be the last reference of light you get from the object at that distance.
Thank YOU! I couldn’t get that, now I see it’s a tracking thing.
9:30 anyone else tried to swipe that polygon off of their screen? :D
"what it would look like is that everything becomes spagettified out really long. The closer you get to the speed of light, the more stretched out everything gets infront of you and also the faster it seems you're getting to each place". Sooooo basically the hyperspace from star wars is actually very scientifically correct?
I was thinking the same exact thing.... the artists did get it right
Both yes and no:
+) Yes, this is how it would appear to you
-) they forgot about Doppler Effect, making everything appear violet
-) you don't need constant output of energy to sustain constant speed.
-) there is no possibility for any energy-based engine to exceed speed of light
-) even with 10x the speed of light, travelling through space would still take a long time. For example, if you used such warp drive to move from Earth to Proxima Centauri star (the closest one we know), it would take you just under 5 months.
@@Admiral45-10 They do travel in hyperspace for extended periods of time, though. You'll catch some episodes where all they're doing is traveling through hyperspace while some story plays out on the ship.
@Lookup VeraZhou it makes it look like it's all within several hours or so.
@@Admiral45-10 Nah, weeks ar a time.
The only man who can play with science and gravity 😵😵😵😳😳😳
"Created my MIT" OMG GORDON FREEMAN MADE IT
Its strange how similar it looks to the dolly zoom moving forward or backward.
9:15 oh I remember that chapter.
I think you made kind of a mistake, you see the speed limit c is not about speed of light, c is a constant of the universe and photons are few of the particles who can travel at that speed due to them having zero rest mass. So what you did(imagined to do) is bring the speed limit from the value of c to 2m/s.
he kinda looks like an AI talking and his head was photoshopped to a body
Imagine, that one day we will find out, that he IS...
That's so black-mirror-ish... o_0