Thank you so much for the support. I'll certainly be doing more reviews on G-shocks. Next up will be an overview/comparison between the 3 types of Mudmasters (excluding the non-solar version.) If you enjoyed the video, please do see ruclips.net/video/zonI9RU3mFs/видео.htmlsi=ESWMVpzDFjP90cUa
@HLi-eu5er I have always struggled more with the terrible negative display Casio had to offer personally. Great watch for the money, especially as it's solar also, but there are other alternatives out there.
@@Dubaiyak I have had a positive GXW-56, legibilty is way better. Personnally I'm more into squares with solar and multiband. Mud resistance is not a issue for me here in Europe.
You have all the g shock that I want.
But couldn't affort all. I have the gwg 2000.
Which one is your pick amongst all?
@mixmaxtube7305 very hard to choose to be honest!
Hi. I enjoyed the video thanks, although it displays on youtube rotate 90 degrees to the right. Please make more Casio/G-Shock videos.
Thank you so much for the support. I'll certainly be doing more reviews on G-shocks. Next up will be an overview/comparison between the 3 types of Mudmasters (excluding the non-solar version.) If you enjoyed the video, please do see ruclips.net/video/zonI9RU3mFs/видео.htmlsi=ESWMVpzDFjP90cUa
I don't get the GX-56. The display is even smaller than the GW-M5610. If you want mud resistent, you can also get a G-9000 or a GW-5510.
@HLi-eu5er I have always struggled more with the terrible negative display Casio had to offer personally. Great watch for the money, especially as it's solar also, but there are other alternatives out there.
@@Dubaiyak I have had a positive GXW-56, legibilty is way better. Personnally I'm more into squares with solar and multiband. Mud resistance is not a issue for me here in Europe.
@HLi-eu5er for my channel it helps me in the salt and sand for sure, but I think all G's are awesome and plenty tough
Looks good those g in the sand
@adebisi27 use it like you stole it I always say!
ky kyy