Collin has pretty solid attacks. The reason for Collin attacking more or less in a game is due to him AND BEN making a gameplan that they play around. If Collin is not attacking much in a specific match, you can guarantee Ben agrees with it and was in on the decision.
Ppa production team.. The side view camera angle is fine for certain replays... But it should never be used for the main coverage angle. Especially if the camera operator insists on zooming in so far that viewers have no clue whether balls near the baseline are in or out. There are a lot of nuances to pickleball that distinguish it from tennis. But as a spectator sport, it should be filmed just like tennis is. A static camera behind the baseline, then assorted cameras at different angles to use for replays and between points. And please please don't just upload a recording of a live streamed video. There are pros and cons to watching a live stream. The main pro is that you are getting the information as quickly as possible so the match can't get spoiled. The main con is that it's difficult to manage a live stream with lots of camera angles and on screen graphics etc and sometimes the internet clogs up or packets get lost, so production problems and or audio/video quality issues are to be expected. But since these pro pickleball videos aren't live, they shouldn't still have the same problems as the live feed. Record the input to the live stream instead of recording the output of the live stream. (To be fair this is a general critique of this RUclips channel in the last year that I've been watching. This particular video had the fewest audio/visual problems I've seen yet. Perhaps being indoors was friendlier to all of the co-mingling electronic components and their wireless connections?) This could be a great and very popular spectator sport. But the production value has to be taken seriously or it's often painful to watch.
Ehh the side view shows you way more about the actual skill in play. From above you have no depth perception and you cant really see the angles and paddle movement. A little farther back side is probably best but you cant beat seeing flat instead of down. Like you dont need coverage of the rest of the court lol although slightly annoying that serve return isnt really important...
Not sure if you're just a discerning fan or a production expert. Either way, I largely agree -- and I'm both a fan and a director (though not of live sports). But I do know that a sports broadcast should put you in the best position on the court for as many shots as possible. The wide side angle is not the 50-yard-line seats they seem to think it is. It's so wide that that it's difficult to appreciate the action, especially when viewed on anything smaller than a desktop monitor. The coverage needs more court-level perspectives to be more exciting and see the extraordinary skills and speed of these players. The coverage has largely improved (with some hiccups here and there), but I do miss having more of the court-level hands-battle shots. (On a small side note, I think they need to rethink where the match referees stand, as their current position might just be a prime spot for a camera to cover the kitchen from a court-level perspective.) Another thing that I would add is that the PPA team needs to level up their replay game. SO many times, they replay the last few seconds of the action without actually showing the best part of the point. I'm sure they're working on this, because it's got to be frustrating for commentators to not have the ability to focus in on highlights. The NFL and many other sports have mastered this -- extracting the perfect highlight moment within seconds of it being live. But the NFL has about $20+ billion in annual revenue and a game that has more pauses. Still, I think the PPA could do much better in focusing in on the highlight of a replay. This tech is out there and more affordable than ever. But they need a dedicated replay team -- if not for the live streams, then at least for broadcasts and posts. I think one huge challenge is production budget, which limits the equipment, set-up time, and technology they have. I'd mention team expertise, too, but I do generally admire what they're doing with what I imagine are very limited resources. They keep trying new things. They're generally improving. And I think they're also dealing with widely different crews in each locale, and the person in charge of production is just not quite experienced enough to understand how much camera placement and proper live-event direction can change the viewer experience of a match. (Or they are experienced enough and they're as frustrated as you are!). Their budgets are obviously much lower because they are nowhere near the sponsorship and viewership levels of tennis. I sincerely hope they'll get the sponsors and personnel necessary to improve their coverage and content.
the indoor is so clean and nice, all skill wins the game
some places I get glare from the lights and loose the ball but I love inside
Who's here for the James Ignatowich foot shuffle ASMR? Lol just kidding
Happy feet
This is a deadly combo...Might be unbeatable, same with ALW and Ben. Ben need to ditch Collin for someone who's better at attacking.
Ben and klinger would be insane
Wtf are you smoking. Ben not ditching Collin for sht
Collin has pretty solid attacks. The reason for Collin attacking more or less in a game is due to him AND BEN making a gameplan that they play around. If Collin is not attacking much in a specific match, you can guarantee Ben agrees with it and was in on the decision.
Definitely agree. Collin can play well but he has not been consistent this year.
@@soccerrfutbolwhat makes you so confident?
Ppa production team..
The side view camera angle is fine for certain replays... But it should never be used for the main coverage angle. Especially if the camera operator insists on zooming in so far that viewers have no clue whether balls near the baseline are in or out.
There are a lot of nuances to pickleball that distinguish it from tennis. But as a spectator sport, it should be filmed just like tennis is. A static camera behind the baseline, then assorted cameras at different angles to use for replays and between points.
And please please don't just upload a recording of a live streamed video. There are pros and cons to watching a live stream. The main pro is that you are getting the information as quickly as possible so the match can't get spoiled. The main con is that it's difficult to manage a live stream with lots of camera angles and on screen graphics etc and sometimes the internet clogs up or packets get lost, so production problems and or audio/video quality issues are to be expected.
But since these pro pickleball videos aren't live, they shouldn't still have the same problems as the live feed. Record the input to the live stream instead of recording the output of the live stream. (To be fair this is a general critique of this RUclips channel in the last year that I've been watching. This particular video had the fewest audio/visual problems I've seen yet. Perhaps being indoors was friendlier to all of the co-mingling electronic components and their wireless connections?)
This could be a great and very popular spectator sport. But the production value has to be taken seriously or it's often painful to watch.
Ehh the side view shows you way more about the actual skill in play. From above you have no depth perception and you cant really see the angles and paddle movement. A little farther back side is probably best but you cant beat seeing flat instead of down. Like you dont need coverage of the rest of the court lol although slightly annoying that serve return isnt really important...
Not sure if you're just a discerning fan or a production expert. Either way, I largely agree -- and I'm both a fan and a director (though not of live sports). But I do know that a sports broadcast should put you in the best position on the court for as many shots as possible. The wide side angle is not the 50-yard-line seats they seem to think it is. It's so wide that that it's difficult to appreciate the action, especially when viewed on anything smaller than a desktop monitor. The coverage needs more court-level perspectives to be more exciting and see the extraordinary skills and speed of these players. The coverage has largely improved (with some hiccups here and there), but I do miss having more of the court-level hands-battle shots. (On a small side note, I think they need to rethink where the match referees stand, as their current position might just be a prime spot for a camera to cover the kitchen from a court-level perspective.)
Another thing that I would add is that the PPA team needs to level up their replay game. SO many times, they replay the last few seconds of the action without actually showing the best part of the point. I'm sure they're working on this, because it's got to be frustrating for commentators to not have the ability to focus in on highlights. The NFL and many other sports have mastered this -- extracting the perfect highlight moment within seconds of it being live. But the NFL has about $20+ billion in annual revenue and a game that has more pauses. Still, I think the PPA could do much better in focusing in on the highlight of a replay. This tech is out there and more affordable than ever. But they need a dedicated replay team -- if not for the live streams, then at least for broadcasts and posts.
I think one huge challenge is production budget, which limits the equipment, set-up time, and technology they have. I'd mention team expertise, too, but I do generally admire what they're doing with what I imagine are very limited resources. They keep trying new things. They're generally improving. And I think they're also dealing with widely different crews in each locale, and the person in charge of production is just not quite experienced enough to understand how much camera placement and proper live-event direction can change the viewer experience of a match. (Or they are experienced enough and they're as frustrated as you are!). Their budgets are obviously much lower because they are nowhere near the sponsorship and viewership levels of tennis. I sincerely hope they'll get the sponsors and personnel necessary to improve their coverage and content.
How did Ignatowich fumble Anna Bright?
Why did you cut out the end of the first game??? WTH??
I'm not gonna watch the rest of it if they're gonna do that! Bye!
4:10
They're definitely here for klinger
🤣
Really tough to watch Ignatowich with his bouncing around…
that bunny hoping gets on my nerves...I can't imagine having in front as a opponent.
Yup. Tough to watch the anti-charismatic tardio & fed as well. I ffw'd thru all but a few minutes
@@Cacheoladafuq? “Anti-charismatic.” 😂 I bet you’re a real go getter yourself!
Please stop criticizing him. He can not help it. It’s a medical condition.
@@jinzhang3062 the hopping?
Terrible camera angle. please never do this again
Ignatowich shuffle is funny now but will lead to neurological problems later like Parkinson’s disease
Every time I see ignatowich he’s just losing to the top pros
Ignatotwitch legs is the cause of his losses. adhd legs
why is the video quality SO BAD!
This was a hard watch, quick but still hard. (Pun intended lol)
?
@@drail15 He's talking about sex
Klinger will be the best doubles player in Pickleball, very soon, if not already.
Negative
Lol how?
Did Ben ditch Colin ?
No. This is not Ben Johns
Minecraft quality pickleball
Bad camera angle. Can’t watch it
They are awful championship games ever seen. Very easy games for champions. No challenges. James didn’t what he supposed to do.