What is this? A New York Post of literature? It's so heartbreaking to see humanity discuss complicated literature with such sensationalized and overly dramatized rhetoric. If the literature does not present enough drama for you, perhaps dig a little deeper with those critical thinking skills. This is truly horrendous. Your negativity and shallow presentation of thought opens up my own negative perspective. You are spreading ego fevers and tabloid information, comrade. Let's try to focus on the sentences he wrote, the intricate criss-cross of symbols, the heart-engine of the work, and not what he poo-pooed. This might as well be Lolita meets Joe Rogan. Controversy computes to views, views, views. Not even a mention of the complex ideas he presented with his use of an unreliable narrator in this work. More time reading and connecting and analyzing, less time producing bot-voiced RUclips videos might do your brain well -- not a direction, simply a suggestion.
The voice is AI-generated because it sounds better than my microphone and my voice, but you're right, it doesn't pronounce the names well 🤧. I'm working to improve for future videos.
What a good review of this very interesting man. Living near Cambridge Massachusetts, I've seen his Blue series of butterfly at the Harvard Museum of Natural History. When visiting Telluride Colorado I think I figured out where he was hunting butterflies atop a ridge when he wrote of the children playing that he mentioned at the end of Lolita. Thanks for this.
This narrator repeatedly calls Nabokov, Nobakov.
Editing errors. We are working to improve in future videos.
One of the great mysteries of this life is the utter failure of even Nabokov’s closest fans to pronounce his (very simple) name.
Why does the narrator speed up?
Editing errors. We are working to improve in future videos.
What is this? A New York Post of literature? It's so heartbreaking to see humanity discuss complicated literature with such sensationalized and overly dramatized rhetoric. If the literature does not present enough drama for you, perhaps dig a little deeper with those critical thinking skills. This is truly horrendous. Your negativity and shallow presentation of thought opens up my own negative perspective. You are spreading ego fevers and tabloid information, comrade. Let's try to focus on the sentences he wrote, the intricate criss-cross of symbols, the heart-engine of the work, and not what he poo-pooed. This might as well be Lolita meets Joe Rogan. Controversy computes to views, views, views. Not even a mention of the complex ideas he presented with his use of an unreliable narrator in this work. More time reading and connecting and analyzing, less time producing bot-voiced RUclips videos might do your brain well -- not a direction, simply a suggestion.
Whenever I hear the narrator mispronounce a well known name I know I am watching AI generated click-bait. Despues, bambino.
The voice is AI-generated because it sounds better than my microphone and my voice, but you're right, it doesn't pronounce the names well 🤧. I'm working to improve for future videos.
What a good review of this very interesting man. Living near Cambridge Massachusetts, I've seen his Blue series of butterfly at the Harvard Museum of Natural History. When visiting Telluride Colorado I think I figured out where he was hunting butterflies atop a ridge when he wrote of the children playing that he mentioned at the end of Lolita. Thanks for this.