I've been hung up on that for about four hours. Among other things. I didn't watch the video or look at the comments, just referenced the 'Examples'. @3:14 :|
Hi, sifatuljannat sayore2day! OK, suppose you see two "moves" in one, e.g., an exercise in which you're asked, "What is the obverse of a contraposed A-proposition?". Think about a two-step inference. In the case of the example I just mention, you first contrapose an A-proposition. Then you obvert the result. Does that make sense? Now let's look at your question: 'What is the converse of an obverted proposition?' The first thing you want to do is obvert the proposition. Next, you'll convert the result. Does that make sense?
the last O meaning is the same as I part.i think it should be some S are non-p.
Hi, Dagim. Thanks! I thought I fixed that typo and re-uploaded the video. You are correct that the O-proposition is Some S are non-P.
I've been hung up on that for about four hours. Among other things. I didn't watch the video or look at the comments, just referenced the 'Examples'. @3:14
:|
I learn this in grade 9... It's hell
What is converted obversion?
Hi, sifatuljannat sayore2day! OK, suppose you see two "moves" in one, e.g., an exercise in which you're asked, "What is the obverse of a contraposed A-proposition?". Think about a two-step inference. In the case of the example I just mention, you first contrapose an A-proposition. Then you obvert the result. Does that make sense?
Now let's look at your question: 'What is the converse of an obverted proposition?' The first thing you want to do is obvert the proposition. Next, you'll convert the result. Does that make sense?
@@miawood8517 got it