Dean's Box 2.0 (DVD, Box, Props, Bag) by Dean Dill and Alan Wong

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 29

  • @mattikaki
    @mattikaki 5 лет назад +4

    And R.I.P. Pete Biro. He helped me a lot. Always kind and warm person.

  • @johnvdl
    @johnvdl 3 года назад +4

    This is an amazing piece of magic!

  • @magictwister76
    @magictwister76 11 лет назад +7

    One of the greatest effects of all time

  • @JasonJacobs
    @JasonJacobs 13 лет назад +3

    Dean Dill is so awesome. I hope to visit his shop one day. Beautiful prop and effect.

  • @magic4uni
    @magic4uni 4 года назад +2

    Just to a second look at this (after about 5 years) and I do believe I have a theory on the last phase. I'll just say the box is a "prop" used for mystery and obviously Mr. Dill has the skill to pull this off.....Like bugs bunny said, "bring in the double."

  • @SheylyMagicShow
    @SheylyMagicShow 2 года назад +1

    My next effect!!

    • @TAROTAI
      @TAROTAI 2 года назад

      . . . is to find some better way to spend your time?

  • @operasinger2126
    @operasinger2126 7 лет назад

    That was great.

  • @davidrodriguez3348
    @davidrodriguez3348 4 года назад +1

    How do I get one of those boxes?

  • @borstenpinsel
    @borstenpinsel 11 лет назад

    Are you talking about the examinable part or the cardboard part? Well, it doesn't really matter. All three phases are possible. The 3rd phase obviously needs slight alterations. The curtain would still be part of the "cardboard" version (even though it would be made from fabric). I was just highlighting that everything is examinable and in no way suggesting to perform this with an actual cardboard box.

  • @daveallan657
    @daveallan657 4 года назад +1

    One day, someone might even use this to create Magic.

  • @borstenpinsel
    @borstenpinsel 13 лет назад +1

    @mcjmagic Nope. The box is fully examinable. In fact you could do this with a cardboard box that anyone in the audience cut out and assembled with some tape.

    • @generic53
      @generic53 6 лет назад +1

      I don't believe you can do the ring part of the routine that way, though, right?

  • @russellsmith8444
    @russellsmith8444 4 года назад

    Oh, how I miss Dean Dill.

  • @magicj89
    @magicj89 13 лет назад

    That's sweet!

  • @robvh2
    @robvh2 11 лет назад +1

    The linking ropes part certainly. The ring on rope not quite so much. Also, the curtains keep the helpers from seeing things they shouldn't. Particularly for the final phase.

  • @magicelliotth
    @magicelliotth 9 лет назад +1

    RIP Dean.

  • @robvh2
    @robvh2 11 лет назад +1

    The quality of the craftsmanship and the thought that went into the routine is worth much more than $30. However, I would agree that $300 is overpriced. The secret has always been obvious to me which is why I was never interested. I can't help but wonder how many people would be truly fooled by it.

    • @modernillusionist5017
      @modernillusionist5017 8 лет назад +3

      That's one of the biggest mistakes Magicians make these days. I'm not saying you make this mistake. But many magicians try to perform magic that fools them or their Magician friends. I'm probably one of the best Magicians here in Florida. And it's all because of just a couple of theories I follow.

    • @presto709
      @presto709 5 лет назад +4

      @@modernillusionist5017 How can you and I both be the best magician in Florida?

  • @grichi1
    @grichi1 13 лет назад

    Of course that guys name is BOB. lol

  • @MrFloMagic
    @MrFloMagic 13 лет назад

    Thats nice, but why it`s called 2.0!? Looks the same as the original routine...!?
    F,M.

  • @ardentabacistx5360
    @ardentabacistx5360 11 лет назад +1

    How stupid!
    This is an OLD trick from KarlFulves "Sef Wiorking Table Magic" Page 52.from Dover Books.

    • @generic53
      @generic53 6 лет назад +2

      I don't believe the Fulves book reveals the ring part of the routine, just the ropes linking. Right?

    • @mrlazli
      @mrlazli 2 года назад

      @@generic53 you are right