Thank you very much for your very enriching video. I calculated the weights of all my features ( soil, slope, altitude, rainfall...) based on the analytical hierarchy process. These features weights are used in the calculation equation in ArcGIS. I have to calculate the wights of all the subfeatures by the same process. These subfeatures weights will be the values of reclassification in ArcGIS?
I have a question: Why in the normalized pair-wise comparison of the price (in sheet 1) in each column you have the same value of the concrete row (for example in whole iPad mini row you have 0.44)? Is it all ok with that? In the sheet which is titled "Multi-level AHP", in the normalized pair-wise comparison of different alternatives, they have different values in each column (for example in the row of alternative A they have different values: 0.74, 0.70, 0.77) Why I am asking, is because in every example of AHP application they have different values in each column, and when I am trying to applicate which AHP to my case values in each column of the concrete row are always the same and I do not understand why.
Sorry, it's been so long since I've done this that I don't remember. It looks like, from the excel file I just attached, that I did. drive.google.com/file/d/10mmxIvpJS4sFcbGOj7BEYFBTDLEKMuKS/view?usp=sharing
this is the best and shortest video explaining AHP i have been watched!
thank you very much!
You're welcome!
Great one. Highly appreciate this video.. In my case a lifesaver
I'm glad it was helpful!
Thank you very much for your very enriching video.
I calculated the weights of all my features ( soil, slope, altitude, rainfall...) based on the analytical hierarchy process. These features weights are used in the calculation equation in ArcGIS.
I have to calculate the wights of all the subfeatures by the same process. These subfeatures weights will be the values of reclassification in ArcGIS?
yes
What if the result was inconsistent? What we should do, bro??
can i have access to the exce sheet please ?
Yah its really good nd helpful 4 me
Thank you so much for your video.
You're welcome!
I have a question:
Why in the normalized pair-wise comparison of the price (in sheet 1) in each column you have the same value of the concrete row (for example in whole iPad mini row you have 0.44)? Is it all ok with that?
In the sheet which is titled "Multi-level AHP", in the normalized pair-wise comparison of different alternatives, they have different values in each column (for example in the row of alternative A they have different values: 0.74, 0.70, 0.77)
Why I am asking, is because in every example of AHP application they have different values in each column, and when I am trying to applicate which AHP to my case values in each column of the concrete row are always the same and I do not understand why.
Hi. Firstly, thank you very much for the video. I have a question. Should we calculate consistency for each sub-criteria?
Sorry, it's been so long since I've done this that I don't remember. It looks like, from the excel file I just attached, that I did. drive.google.com/file/d/10mmxIvpJS4sFcbGOj7BEYFBTDLEKMuKS/view?usp=sharing
can this method use to calculate the consistency of a Basketball player?
can i get your file excel guys...to learn more
Sorry for the late reply. I've added a link to the excel file in the description.
IF CR IS NEGATIVE ???ITS SATISFY THE AHP
Good job
Thank you
You're welcome!