As a kid I used to have the same way of thinking that I needed to eradicate where I believed that for the sideckicked ball it will "take longer" to hit the ground, because it has a longer distance to cover and it "naturally" has to take longer. The thing is - this ball does not act up, instead it is BEING ACTED UPON. So it doesn't make any effort (in layman's terms). Plus, when it hits the ground, it keeps on rolling forward because v0 is still in effect, until friction reduces it down to 0.
A projectile trajectory is never a parabole, and it is not possible to separate x and z equations. If you are a soldier you risk to kill a lot of innocent people and may-be friends if you assume a parabolic trajectory.
![Solving Projectile Motion Problems in Physics - [1-4-7]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/oKIaH2TftpA/mqdefault.jpg)
![Solving Projectile Motion Problems in Physics - [1-4-7]](/img/tr.png)
Nice 👍
Love you sir from Pakistan! 🇵🇰❤️
Love you so much, this is a lot of help
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
Great tutorial...!!!
please keep making videos, i wish everyone can see these videos and give it some attention cuz its soooooo easy to understand and thank you
wow great vidoe
Thank you so much sir
❤❤
As a kid I used to have the same way of thinking that I needed to eradicate where I believed that for the sideckicked ball it will "take longer" to hit the ground, because it has a longer distance to cover and it "naturally" has to take longer. The thing is - this ball does not act up, instead it is BEING ACTED UPON. So it doesn't make any effort (in layman's terms). Plus, when it hits the ground, it keeps on rolling forward because v0 is still in effect, until friction reduces it down to 0.
Sir thank you
A projectile trajectory is never a parabole, and it is not possible to separate x and z equations. If you are a soldier you risk to kill a lot of innocent people and may-be friends if you assume a parabolic trajectory.
.lp
.lp