The fact that you admitted that it wasn't a no ball in your opinion, even as an Indian, makes me proud to be your subscriber. Love from Pak and Happy Diwali to you!
Look whatever he said can be his opinion but I strong diagree with it . It was a clear no ball . I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it . Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
@ satyendr, jab hum Kameenapan me competition karte hai to dusron se bhi badtar ho jatte hai. Gautam Buddha, mahavirswami, guru nanak, Kabir, gorakh, paramhans pagal nahin the jinhone humanity, forgiveness ko sabse upar rakha. Jab manne nafrat hoti hai to khudke dil me bhi shanti nahin rahti hai.
Bro you wins my heart with your honesty.even as an indian you clearly admitted the truth knowing that many of indian fans will criticise your opinion .. Love you bro❤
His opinion is totally wrong . Fact is it was clear no ball as per rules .Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it . Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
@@shailendrakumar-tf3rl bro I am talking about that no ball ok😇🇵🇰 Kindly stop misbehaving Everyone knows that it was a wrong decision made by umpire..... thanks🙏
Brother I strong disagree with him . As per rules ,it was a clear no ball . Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it . Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
I also think, we are lucky as far no ball is concern. I also believe it wasn't no ball. But what a match. In chasing no one is better than kohli in India. Pakistan's bowling was on fire. Thank both teams for giving us this spectacular match. All the best to both teams.
Strongly disagree with your opinion . Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Bro, kohli played best but he lost respect he had in our hearts! And it was clear he was pressuring the umpire, but whatever both teams played well!! WE ARE PROUD OF OUR PAKISTANI PLAYERS!! 🇵🇰💚
Dear, any one would do this, even kamran akmal has said that he would have demanded no ball same way. But yes I also think it wasn't no ball and umpire should taken third opinion on this.
@@nakul_patel ig you can't review a waist height no ball with third umpire ..aur shi tha bhai decision umpires ka ...aur Kohli king h 👑..aur baki apne ko kya India match Jeet gyi 🌝
@Akatsuki , purpose of above waist height rule of no ball is to save batter from threatening delivery. I think that delivery was not threatening, in fact it was juicy fooltass, which any batter would loved it. For me sports is bigger than nationalism. Which ever team is playing better on its day deserve to win. Frankly our team is superior against Pakistan on paper but our team has made many mistake. Our fielding and bowling in death over was pathetic. With much less resources than us, Pakistan team has played some amazing cricket, which we should appreciate.
@@nakul_patel In this way many rules can be morphed according to one's advantage.. on the line wide is still given as wide ..on the line no ball is still given as no ball ..whereas by the same logic we can say that a cm here and there won't make much difference or give undue advantage to bowlers ... nationalism comes before sports for me 🌚.. and the same Pak ppl who were against the umpire decision would be supporting it if the teams were interchanged ...and then Raj would've made a video stating that he also thinks that it was a no ball 🥱
We were very unlucky congratulations to India btw🇵🇰🇮🇳❤ and kohli hats off those sixes to rauf were some serious shots🙌🏼 but hoping our boys will bounce back in next matches💪🏽
I am pakistani obviously I am hearted💔 but it's a game Kisi Aik ny to harna hi tha.. congratulations Indian's. I am proud my green boy's very very well played 👏❤ and mn Aik hi baat "wo no baal nhi thi yaarrrrrrrrrrrrr💔💔
Exactly. Ive admired kohli for a long time and his innings was one of the best ive seen in a crucial t20wc match, but winning in this manner wasn't very sportsman like.
@@RookieYT. Indian ho? tum hi jeetay ho india hi jeeta ha no ball dedi koi baat nahi lekin sawal yeh banta hamaray ghatiya cptn babar awam ne last over spinner ko q diya jo pehlay hi 40 runs khakar betha tha kasam se bilkul bekar lagta ha mujhay babar azam or woh kbhi bhi virat kohli jesa player nahi ban sakhta q k woh apnay liyen khelta ha babar or virat kohli team k liyen khelta ha jesay kal virat kohli chalta ha to match win karwakay jata ha or agar hamara abhi babar hota virat ki jaga to 60 balls par 70 karta or asay maukar par out hojata
@@RookieYT. mai to chah raha hun is baar ham group mai jitni bhi teamen hai us se harjaye takay babar azam ko cptncy se hata den q k woh cptn nahi ha woh srf team mai parchiya or apnay frnd ko khila raha ha asay log bht buray lagtay hai hamen guroor agaya ha usmai apnay ap ko pata nahi kiya samajhnay laga ha babar azam ham usay acha samjhtay thay lekin woh ghatiya insaan ha or khelta ha to srf apni 50 k liyen 45 balls par agar david warner 45 balls khelay to 100 karta ha woh
Agr no ball ka decision thek dia jata to next ball p Kohli out e tha na k 3 runs bnty...just one wrong decision changed the whole game...that's okay.well played boys🇵🇰
Mai bht Indian ko janti hn or support bhi krti hn pr mainy raj jesa insan apni life m nhi dekha ❤I wish hum sb Indian Pakistani raj ki tarha soch rakhy such a amazing guy 💓💓💓💓💓💓
As per rules It was a clear no ball .Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it . Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
Before starting video i had made my mind to unfollow you if you'll give unfair and biased remarks bcz i was so tired of arguing and getting trolled by Indian friends and fans on social media.. But !! Really happy to know your unbiased opinion and your acceptance of truth👏🏻👏🏻 i know now you'll get the same trolling and abuse from your people but i really Appreciate your honesty 💗
According to any rule of cricket its not a no ball Umpire took this decision under pressure from Virat Kohli Because Virat Kohli had appealed for no ball on the previous ball as well. Shame on you Virat Kohli You are a senior player of cricket and you don't know cricket rules ... And it is regrettable that our ICC has also been sold in front of BCCI.
There is no issue about trajectory or dip. Ball is Consider to be no ball if height of ball ( while contacting to bat) is high, but at the same time batsman should be in the crease. In this case, height of the ball is enough to be no ball but Virat is out of the crease as you can see his foot is on line, and on the line is considered as out of the crease. Please correct if I m wrong.
I am Indian but as a fan of cricket and my men in bule army I think pakistan will not panic after this loss... And their do and die game is against SA is way ahead... Before that they will back on track against Zimbabwe and Netherland... If they lose at any of this 1 then they don't deserve to be semifinals.... Bcoz now there is no margin for error to pakistan.. Green boys you have to pull it back .. all the best....
Bro yar no one is saying India cheated hell Virat played his absolute best and honestly congrats India on winning. Hum bas umpire sae upset hain k what was he even thinking..? 😕
His opinion is wrong . As per rules It was a clear no ball .Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it . Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
At the end It's just a luck game and as a pakistani I admit that virat kohli is very lucky for team India... But one unfair decision change the whole game but don't worry pakistanio ALLAH saw everything and he will fair to us INSHAALLAH 💚🇵🇰
Hi brother try to think logically not emotionally . It was a clear no ball as per rules . I strong disagree with his opinion . Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it . Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
Bro as a indian AP ny maan liya wo no ball Ni thi hamary liye itna he bht hai respect ap k liye bht Sy Indian Jo baray cricket k expert hai wo bol rhy hai no ball thi love from Pakistan ❤️🇵🇰
Champions trophy mn isi no ball ny india ki band bajai thi... or ab isi no ball ny t20 mn Pakistan ki band bajaa di... well very awesome match... Pakistani team played like a fighter... but bad luck also.. never give up Pakistan team.. pora world cup parha hy... you are one man army in world cup IN SHAA ALLAH... we believe in you..
One wrong decision stole our peace n sleep otherwise pak🇵🇰was a winner btw I respect you as an Indian you support the Truth thats a big thing for us congrats team India for winning with cheating 😏
Pakistan team lost the match but won our hearts❤️ Everyone knows that wasn't no ball but yeah wrong decision by umpires what to say now🙂 Because of that ball India won the match💯
THAT WAS OUT OR NOT OUT BUT KOHLI PLAYED FANTASTIC ININGS AS CRICKET FAN WE SHOULD SUPPORT BOTH TEAM BECAUSE BOTH TEAM PLAYED VERY WELL CONGRATS INDIA LOVE FROM PAK 🇵🇰
Nai we want to listen to your opinion also as it makes clear for us k as an india a kitna unbiased review dete hein totally honest and we love that. Who else agree with me guyz..
Strongly disagree with your opinion . Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
New rule of icc if a bow is above vest height at the time when it come in cantact with bat .if basemen is behind the crease then it will be declared as no ball it doesn't matter it was a spin bowler or fast bowler ..or it was dipping or not ...
Absolutely Right ! I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it . Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
bohat acha laga k ap ne dosre indians ki tarha ise no ball nahi kaha bal k admit kiya k ye no ball nahi thi arsalan bhai ne bhi bata diya k wo no ball kahin se nahi thi
His opinion is wrong . As per rules It was a clear no ball .Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match. 👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball. So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman. The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease. Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled. If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled. 👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it . Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
The fact that you admitted that it wasn't a no ball in your opinion, even as an Indian, makes me proud to be your subscriber. Love from Pak and Happy Diwali to you!
Same
Happy Diwali..
It was 50/50
Look whatever he said can be his opinion but I strong diagree with it . It was a clear no ball .
I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
@@xyz-x5dj1nw9j Itna lamba comment parne ki auqat Nahi meri😅😂
Raj, Kash hum Sare indian aapki tarah humble aur down to earth hote.
You are better than most of them ke tumne isko critisize nahi kia
Really appreciate this pov, thank you! Love from Pak💚
Sirf indian hi kyu bhai baaki duniya kameena pan kare aur inko humble ban na h bhai humble ke saath humble raho kamine ke saath kamina
@ satyendr, jab hum Kameenapan me competition karte hai to dusron se bhi badtar ho jatte hai. Gautam Buddha, mahavirswami, guru nanak, Kabir, gorakh, paramhans pagal nahin the jinhone humanity, forgiveness ko sabse upar rakha. Jab manne nafrat hoti hai to khudke dil me bhi shanti nahin rahti hai.
@@nakul_patel banta re humble jinki tu baate kar raha na to woh jamana h abhi na vaise log
Bro you wins my heart with your honesty.even as an indian you clearly admitted the truth knowing that many of indian fans will criticise your opinion ..
Love you bro❤
His opinion is totally wrong . Fact is it was clear no ball as per rules .Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
Bro you are so honest ...being an Indian you are not supporting the umpire's decision...really appreciated 👍
Rules dekho phle fir kch bolo ar support karo
Ase kse third umpire ko forward kre ,out huwa tha kya uss ball par bina out hue kse uppr bheje umpire
@@shailendrakumar-tf3rl bro I am talking about that no ball ok😇🇵🇰
Kindly stop misbehaving
Everyone knows that it was a wrong decision made by umpire..... thanks🙏
Brother I strong disagree with him . As per rules ,it was a clear no ball . Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
I also think, we are lucky as far no ball is concern. I also believe it wasn't no ball. But what a match. In chasing no one is better than kohli in India. Pakistan's bowling was on fire. Thank both teams for giving us this spectacular match. All the best to both teams.
the country is running because of kind peoples like you
Happy to see such positivity 💗
Much respect for you...such a kind reaction
Love you bro 😘.
Strongly disagree with your opinion . Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Bro, kohli played best but he lost respect he had in our hearts! And it was clear he was pressuring the umpire, but whatever both teams played well!! WE ARE PROUD OF OUR PAKISTANI PLAYERS!! 🇵🇰💚
Dear, any one would do this, even kamran akmal has said that he would have demanded no ball same way. But yes I also think it wasn't no ball and umpire should taken third opinion on this.
@@nakul_patel Bro, We truly respect and admire your players. But this was something we had to say. 🌚
@@nakul_patel ig you can't review a waist height no ball with third umpire ..aur shi tha bhai decision umpires ka ...aur Kohli king h 👑..aur baki apne ko kya India match Jeet gyi 🌝
@Akatsuki , purpose of above waist height rule of no ball is to save batter from threatening delivery. I think that delivery was not threatening, in fact it was juicy fooltass, which any batter would loved it. For me sports is bigger than nationalism. Which ever team is playing better on its day deserve to win. Frankly our team is superior against Pakistan on paper but our team has made many mistake. Our fielding and bowling in death over was pathetic. With much less resources than us, Pakistan team has played some amazing cricket, which we should appreciate.
@@nakul_patel In this way many rules can be morphed according to one's advantage.. on the line wide is still given as wide ..on the line no ball is still given as no ball ..whereas by the same logic we can say that a cm here and there won't make much difference or give undue advantage to bowlers ... nationalism comes before sports for me 🌚.. and the same Pak ppl who were against the umpire decision would be supporting it if the teams were interchanged ...and then Raj would've made a video stating that he also thinks that it was a no ball 🥱
Raj Aisy hi nahi Raj, he is gem as a person, lots of respect for you bro
Honesty is the best power bro....I am Pakistani and however we still love our neighbors ❤️
We were very unlucky congratulations to India btw🇵🇰🇮🇳❤ and kohli hats off those sixes to rauf were some serious shots🙌🏼 but hoping our boys will bounce back in next matches💪🏽
I am pakistani obviously I am hearted💔 but it's a game Kisi Aik ny to harna hi tha.. congratulations Indian's. I am proud my green boy's very very well played 👏❤ and mn Aik hi baat "wo no baal nhi thi yaarrrrrrrrrrrrr💔💔
A lot of respect from Pak ... May Allah bless you with great success
you are so honest bro rest of indians are just happy with this decision even if it is right or wrong.....
You don't need to stay quiet, we love listening to your opinions and you don't waste our time. 💕💕
Your unbaised opinion makes me love you even more, not in a romantic way though! 😂 But my respect for you has increased. ♥️
I really admire your honesty!
-with Respect,
A dedicated Pakistani fan (and your subscriber)
That one ball costed us 10 runs.
7 on no ball and 3 on free hit.
Exactly. Ive admired kohli for a long time and his innings was one of the best ive seen in a crucial t20wc match, but winning in this manner wasn't very sportsman like.
Truth : Pak won by 10 runs :)
@@xelate2249 hehe we win yayyyy😂😂
@@RookieYT. Indian ho? tum hi jeetay ho india hi jeeta ha no ball dedi koi baat nahi lekin sawal yeh banta hamaray ghatiya cptn babar awam ne last over spinner ko q diya jo pehlay hi 40 runs khakar betha tha kasam se bilkul bekar lagta ha mujhay babar azam or woh kbhi bhi virat kohli jesa player nahi ban sakhta q k woh apnay liyen khelta ha babar or virat kohli team k liyen khelta ha jesay kal virat kohli chalta ha to match win karwakay jata ha or agar hamara abhi babar hota virat ki jaga to 60 balls par 70 karta or asay maukar par out hojata
@@RookieYT. mai to chah raha hun is baar ham group mai jitni bhi teamen hai us se harjaye takay babar azam ko cptncy se hata den q k woh cptn nahi ha woh srf team mai parchiya or apnay frnd ko khila raha ha asay log bht buray lagtay hai hamen guroor agaya ha usmai apnay ap ko pata nahi kiya samajhnay laga ha babar azam ham usay acha samjhtay thay lekin woh ghatiya insaan ha or khelta ha to srf apni 50 k liyen 45 balls par agar david warner 45 balls khelay to 100 karta ha woh
Congratulations India❤️🎉🥳
This person is so honest even being an Indian he is with truth your new subscriber so honest man yr😍
Agr no ball ka decision thek dia jata to next ball p Kohli out e tha na k 3 runs bnty...just one wrong decision changed the whole game...that's okay.well played boys🇵🇰
Empire ki Galti ki wajah se Pakistan match Har gya 😢
qismat yaaar😥 koi nae abhi worldcup hai poora
@@Bakewithme28 🥺🥺
🥺🥺
Mai bht Indian ko janti hn or support bhi krti hn pr mainy raj jesa insan apni life m nhi dekha ❤I wish hum sb Indian Pakistani raj ki tarha soch rakhy such a amazing guy 💓💓💓💓💓💓
Well said man
You win our hearts with your honesty
You and Arsalan are absolutely same... from your beards to your smile and you both are genuinely kind and honest..
Love from Pakistan
Exactly that was not a no ball, even after that, I still want to say congrats to All Indians 😒😊😊😊😍
Such a honest person you are ..!! Proud to be your subscriber..
As per rules It was a clear no ball .Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
Before starting video i had made my mind to unfollow you if you'll give unfair and biased remarks bcz i was so tired of arguing and getting trolled by Indian friends and fans on social media.. But !! Really happy to know your unbiased opinion and your acceptance of truth👏🏻👏🏻 i know now you'll get the same trolling and abuse from your people but i really Appreciate your honesty 💗
This man deserves respect❤
Raj being honest won my ❤️ 😀
App Jnab ko bhi matches ma Interest h. BHAI WAH
Umpire nay galt umpiring ki🥺
According to any rule of cricket its not a no ball Umpire took this decision under pressure from Virat Kohli Because Virat Kohli had appealed for no ball on the previous ball as well. Shame on you Virat Kohli You are a senior player of cricket and you don't know cricket rules ...
And it is regrettable that our ICC has also been sold in front of BCCI.
There is no issue about trajectory or dip.
Ball is Consider to be no ball if height of ball ( while contacting to bat) is high, but at the same time batsman should be in the crease.
In this case, height of the ball is enough to be no ball but Virat is out of the crease as you can see his foot is on line, and on the line is considered as out of the crease.
Please correct if I m wrong.
U r the first indian who admits that no ball was actually not a no ball so happy😃💚
Khair InshAllah aagy matches hyn.... But our team played very well hmary liay wohi winner hyn
Good reaction raj bhai
I love to watch your reaction
You're actually first Indian I like😅😅😅😅🥰
Your opinion makes me happy ❤ thats why i love brain chow reactions only
I am Indian but as a fan of cricket and my men in bule army I think pakistan will not panic after this loss... And their do and die game is against SA is way ahead... Before that they will back on track against Zimbabwe and Netherland... If they lose at any of this 1 then they don't deserve to be semifinals.... Bcoz now there is no margin for error to pakistan.. Green boys you have to pull it back .. all the best....
Theee onlyyyyy honest indian youtube channel😭❤️ i swearrrrr!!!
Bro yar no one is saying India cheated hell Virat played his absolute best and honestly congrats India on winning. Hum bas umpire sae upset hain k what was he even thinking..? 😕
I think India deserved that victory. Cause they played really really well especially Virat Kohli. 🇵🇰 ❤️ 🇮🇳
Happy Diwali 🎆
Only kohli played from there and the entire Pakistani team played thou.
Your reactions are amazing just like your personality 😂❤
Yess its right 😅
His opinion is wrong . As per rules It was a clear no ball .Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
I respect the fact that you agree with arsalaan bhai. Respect bro
Happy Diwali Raj it's good to hear your opinion as well lots of love and respect to you ❤️🪔
Ap ak achy or sachy insaan ho
I always respect every video of urz as ur heart is so clean for Pakistan.
At the end It's just a luck game and as a pakistani I admit that virat kohli is very lucky for team India... But one unfair decision change the whole game but don't worry pakistanio ALLAH saw everything and he will fair to us INSHAALLAH 💚🇵🇰
Khushi is chiz ki hai k apne sahi baat ka sath diya. Unlike others😊
9:27 ye baat sun ka Malik or hafeez ki yad agyi🥺
Happy diwali raj sada khush raho ameen. ❤❤🌹🙌🇵🇰
Thnk you. ❤❤❤🙌
I love u because u give respect to each and everyone. Love from Pakistan ❤️
Raj bhai ap bout achy insan ho ap ne accept kiya k no ball nhi thi koi accept kr ly to dukh km hota h
اڑ بیٹھے کیا سمجھ کے بھلا طور پر کلیم
طاقت ہو دید کی تو تقاضا کرے کوئی❤️❤️❤️💕
We love our Pakistan cricket team 🇵🇰❤️
As an indian you too thought it was not a no ball thats make me proud to be your subscriber♥️ love from pak😘
Hi brother try to think logically not emotionally .
It was a clear no ball as per rules . I strong disagree with his opinion . Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
Kaafi saray nahinnnn 100 percent Pakistani ye hi sochtay hen k cheating hui ha. Also boht se international log bhi!
kohli pressured the umpires
Finally koi indian mila jo sensible baat krta hai
Respect++
Only a one indian jo pure hai jis k mou se bura nai lgta sunne ma kch bhi coz you always saying truth always love you raj you are love ever💕
Bro as a indian AP ny maan liya wo no ball Ni thi hamary liye itna he bht hai respect ap k liye bht Sy Indian Jo baray cricket k expert hai wo bol rhy hai no ball thi love from Pakistan ❤️🇵🇰
Yr koi koi bnda asa hota h jis ke opinions sunnay ka dil karta h us ki her bat achi lagti h... Honestly un me se ek ap bh ho💕🇵🇰
I love his videos so much the only unbiased reactor ♥️
Champions trophy mn isi no ball ny india ki band bajai thi... or ab isi no ball ny t20 mn Pakistan ki band bajaa di... well very awesome match... Pakistani team played like a fighter... but bad luck also.. never give up Pakistan team.. pora world cup parha hy... you are one man army in world cup IN SHAA ALLAH... we believe in you..
You are true human being love from Pakistan
Happy diwali and congratulations for the win 🤍
Thankyou for your positive vibes. So humble you are really. Warna match jb se haare itni indians Trolling horae.
Honesty is the best policy,❤️
Shukar hay Bhai kisi Indian ko bhi yeah no ball lagi ♥️
One wrong decision stole our peace n sleep otherwise pak🇵🇰was a winner btw I respect you as an Indian you support the Truth thats a big thing for us congrats team India for winning with cheating 😏
Pakistan team lost the match but won our hearts❤️
Everyone knows that wasn't no ball but yeah wrong decision by umpires what to say now🙂
Because of that ball India won the match💯
Everyone know that wasn’t no ball 😢
Yes
I want a rematch 😭😭
It was😢
@@maryamhamed49 me too 🥺
KOE ni Is Ma Bhi ALLAH pak Ki kuch bahtri ho gi
I saw 1st genuine indian ♥️♥️
THAT WAS OUT OR NOT OUT BUT KOHLI PLAYED FANTASTIC ININGS AS CRICKET FAN WE SHOULD SUPPORT BOTH TEAM BECAUSE BOTH TEAM PLAYED VERY WELL CONGRATS INDIA LOVE FROM PAK 🇵🇰
You are such honest person
WHO WANTS A REMATCH???????
Nai we want to listen to your opinion also as it makes clear for us k as an india a kitna unbiased review dete hein totally honest and we love that. Who else agree with me guyz..
Yes indian team is always do this type of blender also
Not cheating but controversial
This is the true analysis of good sports man
just an honesty needed for u guys thanks a lote
Please if u say something, pause the vdo, its good to listen to the vdo as well as your opinion simultaneously...
You make me proud as your viewer and now *subscriber*
Rule padd 22 3rd impair koi v dede but decision impair ka hotaa haai
Love from Pakistan 🇵🇰❤️
that was not no ball😭
Hence Proved : Umpire saste nashe mai tha (peso ka nasha)😏
Jo sch ka sath dyga hmysha usky sath hein hm love you brother
no ball ki wja se Pakistan jeeta hoa match hr gya
u said right
Always subscribe ur channel... bcoz u are honest bro
Bhai kia kar sakty hai icc ka sadar India hai Jo chae Karwa dey
YAYAYAYA I LOVE YOUR REACTIONS FR JALDI JALDI VIDEOS DAALA KERO RAJ😂😭❤️
LOVE FROM PAKISTAN🇵🇰❤️
Strongly disagree with your opinion . Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Yar chahay Woh run Lana legal ha mager ya btao agr out Ker na ha to pahlay to wicket sehi Ker ni pray ge
I was waiting for ur video
New rule of icc if a bow is above vest height at the time when it come in cantact with bat .if basemen is behind the crease then it will be declared as no ball it doesn't matter it was a spin bowler or fast bowler ..or it was dipping or not ...
Absolutely Right ! I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
no pls give your opinion, u are one of the two youtubers I respect due to his open mindedness
bohat acha laga k ap ne dosre indians ki tarha ise no ball nahi kaha bal k admit kiya k ye no ball nahi thi arsalan bhai ne bhi bata diya k wo no ball kahin se nahi thi
Respect for you....that was our bad luck both team played well but it's India's luck
Yes bro yah no ball nhi thi but I am happy you know that☺
Yar I love watching your match analysis! Unbiased and true 👏
His opinion is wrong . As per rules It was a clear no ball .Look I am of the opinion and agree that it was a close no ball call and technology should have been used when it's available for such a decison . But Fact is it was a clear no ball and there was no doubt about it but it was a close one as I said and as per icc rules upgraded in 2017,a spinner delivery above waist high even a bit, then it is no ball but I agree the technology should have been used for making such a decison at such crucial time of match.
👉 Secondly RULE 41.7.1 :- Any delivery, which passes or would have passed, without pitching, above waist height of the striker standing upright, is unfair. Whenever such a delivery is bowled, the umpire shall call and signal NO Ball.
So as per this above rule ,It states that for a high full toss to be a no ball, it is necessary that the height of the ball should be higher than the batsman's waist at the first point of contact with the batsman.
The second condition is that the batsman is not playing the shot while charging beyond the crease.
Now At the time when the ball came in contact with Virat's bat, his height was more than Virat's waist. That is, the first condition for a no ball that is fulfilled.
If you see the picture available of Virat while playing that no ball , Virat is seen playing on the front foot. He was not trying to hit by stepping down. Just playing on the front foot. His back foot was still on the crease while playing the shot. That is, the second condition of the no ball for the height is also being fulfilled.
👉So Lastly It actually depends on the on field umpires. It doesn't depends on where the batsman is standing. What matters is the height of the ball. Suppose the batsman is standing just outside his crease and the ball is above waist height then it will be a no-ball as even if he would be standing a little back that wouldn't have made a big difference. The only chance where a high waist full toss can be considered as a legal ball is when the batsman charges down to hit the bowler because there is the highest chance that the ball could be a legal ball as I said ..and in kohli case kohli right foot was on popping crease too and he was playing on frontfoot ,So it was a clear no ball as he didn't charged down to hit a bowler like Karthik did 2 balls before which was rightly not called a no ball by umpire and kohli's one was rightly adjudged no ball. This is my view and observation . You are free to disagree with it .
Cheers🇮🇳🇵🇰👍
sab soch me hai no ball nh thi Cheating match india last me Empire India ki hi fever me gaya💔
You are always win our 💕