⚖️ Burden of PROOF: Civil vs. Criminal Standards

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 мар 2024

Комментарии • 4

  • @advanceromance2656
    @advanceromance2656 24 дня назад +2

    Civil---- Burden of proof 51% to 49% ---Plaintiff prevails.

    • @Lawyer_Tips
      @Lawyer_Tips  24 дня назад +1

      Yes exactly! In civil cases, the burden of proof only needs to “tip the scales” in your favor - ie, it is more likely true than not.

  • @teufelhund3801
    @teufelhund3801 2 месяца назад

    If there was a presumption of innocence, then without strong evidence, there should be no bond...

    • @Lawyer_Tips
      @Lawyer_Tips  2 месяца назад

      The presumption of innocence and the requirement of posting bond are two separate legal concepts that serve different purposes in the criminal justice system.
      The presumption of innocence is a fundamental legal principle that requires the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It places the burden of proof entirely on the prosecution, and the defendant is not obligated to prove their innocence. This principle stems from constitutional due process rights and ensures that individuals are not punished unless their guilt is established through a fair trial.
      On the other hand, the bond requirement is a mechanism used to ensure the defendant's appearance at future court proceedings. It does not bear on the evidence. Even when the evidence against a defendant is weak or lacking, the court may still require bond if there are concerns about the defendant's flight risk or potential threat to others.