Thank you for watching! Please subscribe for more and don’t forget to hit the bell icon so you don’t miss our new videos. www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfiles?sub_confirmation=1 Watch our videos advert free and listen to audio only episodes on our website. www.peopleprofiles.com/join/ You can also watch marathon videos on People Profiles Extra www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfilesExtra Or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles
Poor Anne. I can't imagine what it must have been like for her. Father in exile, hating her. Baby coffins piling up and her helpless to save her babies or stop conceiving more. Losing everyone who supported her. Tragedy after tragedy.
I have a huge amount of respect for Queen Anne, to suffer so much personal tragedy then over see so many changes in the period of her reign was remarkable. Thank you for this.
I knew a little about Queen Anne but not nearly enough. Thank you for rectifying that. Outstanding research, amazing narration and fantastic production. Thanks guys. You never disappoint.
Probably one of the most underrated Monarchs in English/British history. She let Godophin run the Government and Churchill run thr military. She understood her personal limitations, but unlike William III, this was her strength. The United Kingdom and Scotland owe her a good deal of gratitude.
Unfortunately there is no mention of Ashby V White (1703) in this documentary Queen Ann I believe had quite a significant input of this constitutional issue of a subjects right to vote
So much was achieved during Queen Anne’s reign yet we hear more of her sad natal journey than all she achieved. I admire this queen more than Victoria.
We cannot diss Queen Victoria, she saw the poverty and the worst impacted being women and children and started the supports women have in this day and age, like pain relief in child birth, and child protection and even some movement towards the beginning of women's rights....
@@lynettefinnigan9540 Of course no mother had the instinct to protect her child before Victoria 🙄 Now the gov remove babies from poor families and give them to same gender relationships
@@lynettefinnigan9540 Of course no mother had the instinct to protect her baby before Victoria.. Now the gov removes babies from impoverished families and gives them to same genda partners in the name of child protection 🙄
Hi. That was so interesting but very tragic to hear about the troubles Queen Anne suffered. Although none of her issues were her own fault, I'm not really at all surprised that she mourned the untimely loss of all of her large family of 17 children and her husband. It's very clear that she had a hard, troubled, and unhealthy life. It's so terribly sad that she lost all of her children, mostly to the fatal disease - smallpox. It's a mystery as to how it just left devastated mothers, fathers, husbands, and wives all over the entire country. If it hadn't been for the disease, I'd think it's a possibility that some of her children possibly would have survived longer. She was just a sad and unlucky royal breeding machine. Even though she was never very well, strong, and healthy, I don't think her many tiring and exhausting pregnancies also took a toll on her health as well. Didn't it? I also get the feeling that the fatal stroke she suffered on the 30th July 1714, the 14th anniversary of her longest lived child, Price William's death, was probably brought on by the stress of his death 6 days after his 11th birthday just 14 years earlier. But 310 long years after her death, I bet some historians still wonder what all of the illnesses are that she had the misfortune of suffering all of her 49-year life. At least she can now talk to them in peace in Westminster. I don't think she had a very good and happy 20th birthday, as her uncle, King Charles II (29.5.1630 - 6.2.1685), died. Surely, she was devastated by his passing late that morning, aged 54. I suppose the only thing she can count herself lucky about was the fact that she survived to adulthood along with her sister Mary, who was 22 months older. It's obvious that Anne loved and adored her son Prince William (24.7.1689 - 30.7.1700) and was very sad and heartbroken at his death. As he lived longer than his many other siblings, I expect she did all sorts of things with him to keep occupied and happy. She wasn't a bad and nasty mother at all, Anne just didn't have much luck with raising her 17 children all the way to adulthood. One death after another must have hit her very hard indeed. There's no doubt that her husband, Prince George, also felt the same as her - sad and disappointed. I so would have thought it was very hard for them both to get over their losses together as a devoted and loving couple. The main for them was that they both had each other's comfort and company. I hope the next story, which will be of King George I, isn't too far and long away. It'll be the start of the Hanoverian period. It will be interesting to see what is and has to be said about him & his unpopularity as a husband and father. I believe he was also a distant cousin of Queen Anne as well. As Anne's life was terribly sad, hard, and unpleasant for her, I am also not surprised that she objected to her once childhood friend Sarah Churchill doing something which was totally unnecessary that just upset Anne a lot more, and that was by removing all of the pictures of her late husband, Prince George of Denmark. That so wouldn't have helped Anne get over his passing at all, but Mrs Churchill didn't show any friend like behaviour by having or showing any respect and comfort towards her very upset and unwell friend Anne. She surely must have mourned for him for quite a long while. Hope to hear from you shortly. Robert 2.6.24
To answer the question at the end, I think Queen Anne was one of the the greatest monarchs England, Scotland and Ireland, later, Great Britain and Ireland ever had, and are more than often conviently forgotten 😢.
To me this gives Queen Anne justice. That movie (the favourite) ruined her reputation and made her seem like a pointless monarch. This is a fitting tribute.
That disgusting film-The Favourite-could have, like this documentary, told the fascinating story and indeed tragedy of Queen Anne. Instead it tried to focus its attention on the titillations of her relationship with Sarah Churchill and paint her as a rabid lesbian. I’m gay and find this appalling. Her life was deeply tragic and they could have explored the devastating consequences these events had on her but that would not have suited Hollywoods depraved narratives-and Olivia Coleman was awful as Anne just as she is in most roles. This was a much more interesting, thoughtful and detailed delve into the life of a very tragic but very important Queen.
There is something which does, but is more obscure. The 70s miniseries ‘The First Churchills’ focuses on Sarah and John Churchill, but covers Anne in great detail to a more reasonably historically accurate degree
@@blahblahblahblah729 Now you are showing your ignorance. Anne was betrayed as an imbecile which she was not. There is no evidence to show that she was a lesbian-many women have very close female friends-that does not make them lesbians. Olivia was also dreadful as HM Queen Elizabeth in the crown-she does not have the gravitas to play those roles. Helen Mirren on the other hand played The Queen wonderfully and she's a republican(as in anti monarchist as opposed to the political party).
@@blahblahblahblah729 You may think Olivia Coleman is great but just because others don't doesn't mean they are 'hating'. I mean, how old are you? Many people see Olivia Coleman as a formulaic actor who's only real ability is to look like the goddess of resting bitch face with added snot. maybe you are just swayed by popular opinion. She has a bit of talent but her dour on screen presence is a turn off, like those who don't allow people to have preferences and opinions.
People Profiles, Anne, Queen of Great Britain, is my favourite royal and monarch of all time. I have long been asking for you guys to create her a documentary, that one; will be a documentary about her and two; a documentary that could do her justice like only People Profiles can. I was so happy when you announced and published the Queen Mary II of England documentary, (mainly because there is so little information about her and I knew this will give a better insight into this often forgotten monarch) and wondered how my favourite monarch and royal will overtake that. I didn't even really know how to react on the community post, which I eventually thought the Queen Mary II of England, will remain the more favourable one. After watching this documentary I can say with certainty, it ousted the Queen Mary II of England one. I said it before, and I'm going to say it again; People Profiles, you have outdone yourselves!!! Thank you for providing us with this fantastic throughly researched documentary of Anne, Queen of Great Britain. I enjoyed it it immensely and never have I felt like crying in a documentary, but you even got the sadness of the emotion of loosing so much children onto me. To end off with, all I can say is, People Profiles thank you, thank you, thank you. Thank you so much, you created much joy for a supporter ❤️💙❤️💙❤️💙.
Queen Anne is probably the British monarch I know the least about. You'd probably have to go back to some obscure Anglo-Saxon king to find a "British" monarch I know less about. I'm hoping I'll learn enough about Queen Anne that I can at least begin to even have an actual opinion about her. For those who already watched the video, what did you think?
FYI: all her pregnancies preceded her reign as queen. As it was, the death of her only remaining child in 1700, prior to her accession, was what led Parliament the following year to pass the Act of Settlement. For although Anne had been heiress apparent to the throne since the death in 1694 of her older sister and guaranteed to succeed (as long as she survived her cousin and brother-in-law, William of Orange), she also seemed likely to die without surviving issue. The purpose of the 1701 Act, then, was to ensure that the crown remain in the hands of Protestants, and not to any Catholic descendant of the Stuarts. As it was, the nearest Protestant relative who was of unquestionably legitimate and royal birth was the Electress Sophia of Hanover.
James V Of Scotland Queen Anne's ancestor was right about the Stuart Dynasty when he lay dying. He said: "it came with a lass and will end with a lass" he was thinking about his daughter Mary with that in mind, but in reality the Dynasty really did end with a girl: Anne Stuart in 1714 when she died without legitimate issue and the throne passed to the house of hanover with the accession of Geroge Louis Prince Elector Of Hanover.
My great great grandmother had 13 pregnancies, but only four of the children survived to adulthood. I can't even begin to imagine such pain. She and Anne sadly appear to have had this in common.
I've stumbled on them on my family tree , via my Scottish ties to the Campbell's , the Duncan's and the McLaughlin and Kennedy clans , who intertwined with royalty . I'm intrigued . Binge watching to try to see how it links up... but I'm very much recognizing our family nose and lip dimple . 😊
I don't know how you cope with losing 16 of 17 children before the age of 2 and the 17th at the age of 11. That's too much torture for one person surely. You wouldn't blame someone if they never smiled or interacted with the world again.
It's crazy to me that the protestant nobles in England would rather have a continental protestant who didn't even speak English in George I, instead of home grown royal Stuarts with all the prestige and history that came with the family. Religion is nuts. In Scotland, at least, there was still loyalty to the Stuarts. Catholics and Protestants stood behind the dynasty, choosing dynastic loyalty over religion.
You know, The People Profiles, as much as I enjoy these documents of historical monarchs, I have begun to question the term "illegitimate children". As far as I know, legally speaking, all children of their parent are not only allowed to exist but also equally rightful heirs. Whether a child's parents are married or not is not relevant; that person is in any case entitled to an inheritance of his or her father, provided that the paternity is confirmed before the father's death. So the idea that none of Charles II's sons could not become his successor as the king because they were somehow "illegitimate" is ludicrous.
I wouldn't be surprised if James the second had people caring for the children destroy her line. He had serious motive. So did a few others. It's interesting though - it looks like Scotland was starting to develope a democracy at this point! Especially with the Whig party, the Scottish Rite, the Scottish influence in America. And in France - it's like France helped us with the American Revolution and that seriously inspired the French Revolution in Marie Antoinettes time. Queen Anne made a serious impact in politics in spite of her familial losses.
I listen to this guy at nite when I can't sleep better than ASMR .... this channel will get more views if you had some that actually doesn't put you to sleep
One day in my house in Spain can heard a big love than a man call name Margarete. Who went Margaret in England. Please. The love never death. God put in deep air.
@@pedanticradiator1491 That is why there is an Edit function. To correct errors. You can correct yours too To say Elizabeth II was only 12.5% Scottish.
Evidently you forgot about King James VI of Scotland and I of England. As well as Richard Stewart, 1st Earl of Orkney, son of King James V and Euphemia Elphinstone.
That princess was neither a legitimate queen nor was she the last of the Stuarts. There are legitimate Stuart descendants to this day, their chief representative being the legitimate de jure King.
@@pedanticradiator1491 Crazy, isn't it? When the protestants 'ran out' of Stuarts the English brought in a German (descended from the Stuarts, oddly enough). And now going round the other way, the usurped Stuarts' top dog is another German. Poor old England, just can't get away from them.
Thank you for watching! Please subscribe for more and don’t forget to hit the bell icon so you don’t miss our new videos. www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfiles?sub_confirmation=1
Watch our videos advert free and listen to audio only episodes on our website. www.peopleprofiles.com/join/
You can also watch marathon videos on People Profiles Extra www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfilesExtra
Or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles
Poor dear, I couldn't imagine the pain she and her husband went through losing all those children.
She wasn’t poor, in fact she was very rich.
Heartbreaking
@@michaelturner5050 wow. You're a knob.
@michaelturner5050 do you think rich people don't feel the loss of a child?
@@johnmclachlan1023 what?
Poor Anne. I can't imagine what it must have been like for her. Father in exile, hating her. Baby coffins piling up and her helpless to save her babies or stop conceiving more. Losing everyone who supported her. Tragedy after tragedy.
James II died a year before Anne became Queen.
I have a huge amount of respect for Queen Anne, to suffer so much personal tragedy then over see so many changes in the period of her reign was remarkable. Thank you for this.
I love listening to these podcasts on my headphones while going for long country walks. Thank you The People Profiles.
Wow!
Thats a brilliant idea😀
Where do you go for country walks?😊I would love to be able to do that. Sounds wonderful!!
I knew a little about Queen Anne but not nearly enough. Thank you for rectifying that. Outstanding research, amazing narration and fantastic production. Thanks guys. You never disappoint.
I always felt very sorry for poor old Anne, she got the short straw. But she was cleverer than many made her out to be
Probably one of the most underrated Monarchs in English/British history. She let Godophin run the Government and Churchill run thr military. She understood her personal limitations, but unlike William III, this was her strength. The United Kingdom and Scotland owe her a good deal of gratitude.
Scotland is in the UK
Unfortunately there is no mention of Ashby V White (1703) in this documentary
Queen Ann I believe had quite a significant input of this constitutional issue of a subjects right to vote
So much was achieved during Queen Anne’s reign yet we hear more of her sad natal journey than all she achieved. I admire this queen more than Victoria.
We cannot diss Queen Victoria, she saw the poverty and the worst impacted being women and children and started the supports women have in this day and age, like pain relief in child birth, and child protection and even some movement towards the beginning of women's rights....
What was achieved❓By Anne
@@lynettefinnigan9540
Of course no mother had the instinct to protect her child before Victoria 🙄
Now the gov remove babies from poor families and give them to same gender relationships
@@lynettefinnigan9540
Of course no mother had the instinct to protect her baby before Victoria..
Now the gov removes babies from impoverished families and gives them to same genda
partners in the name of child protection 🙄
Nobody was dissing Queen Vi, all they said was that they respected Anne more, which i honestly cant disagree with. @@lynettefinnigan9540
She may have had lupus. Without today’s diagnosis and treatment, she must have had a very difficult, painful life.
It's not lupus it's never lupus
I will say this, all the deaths miscarriages she had , some would have gone insane .she was a very different kind of monarch
Hi. That was so interesting but very tragic to hear about the troubles Queen Anne suffered. Although none of her issues were her own fault, I'm not really at all surprised that she mourned the untimely loss of all of her large family of 17 children and her husband. It's very clear that she had a hard, troubled, and unhealthy life.
It's so terribly sad that she lost all of her children, mostly to the fatal disease - smallpox. It's a mystery as to how it just left devastated mothers, fathers, husbands, and wives all over the entire country. If it hadn't been for the disease, I'd think it's a possibility that some of her children possibly would have survived longer. She was just a sad and unlucky royal breeding machine. Even though she was never very well, strong, and healthy, I don't think her many tiring and exhausting pregnancies also took a toll on her health as well. Didn't it?
I also get the feeling that the fatal stroke she suffered on the 30th July 1714, the 14th anniversary of her longest lived child, Price William's death, was probably brought on by the stress of his death 6 days after his 11th birthday just 14 years earlier. But 310 long years after her death, I bet some historians still wonder what all of the illnesses are that she had the misfortune of suffering all of her 49-year life. At least she can now talk to them in peace in Westminster.
I don't think she had a very good and happy 20th birthday, as her uncle, King Charles II (29.5.1630 - 6.2.1685), died. Surely, she was devastated by his passing late that morning, aged 54. I suppose the only thing she can count herself lucky about was the fact that she survived to adulthood along with her sister Mary, who was 22 months older.
It's obvious that Anne loved and adored her son Prince William (24.7.1689 - 30.7.1700) and was very sad and heartbroken at his death. As he lived longer than his many other siblings, I expect she did all sorts of things with him to keep occupied and happy. She wasn't a bad and nasty mother at all, Anne just didn't have much luck with raising her 17 children all the way to adulthood. One death after another must have hit her very hard indeed. There's no doubt that her husband, Prince George, also felt the same as her - sad and disappointed. I so would have thought it was very hard for them both to get over their losses together as a devoted and loving couple. The main for them was that they both had each other's comfort and company.
I hope the next story, which will be of King George I, isn't too far and long away. It'll be the start of the Hanoverian period. It will be interesting to see what is and has to be said about him & his unpopularity as a husband and father. I believe he was also a distant cousin of Queen Anne as well. As Anne's life was terribly sad, hard, and unpleasant for her, I am also not surprised that she objected to her once childhood friend Sarah Churchill doing something which was totally unnecessary that just upset Anne a lot more, and that was by removing all of the pictures of her late husband, Prince George of Denmark. That so wouldn't have helped Anne get over his passing at all, but Mrs Churchill didn't show any friend like behaviour by having or showing any respect and comfort towards her very upset and unwell friend Anne. She surely must have mourned for him for quite a long while.
Hope to hear from you shortly.
Robert 2.6.24
The first Ruler of Great Britain! Thanks For this Guys! You're the Best ❤❤❤
She and her husband George deserved MUCH better in the children departmet😢😢😢😢😢
They did 😢.
Fascinating, thank you! A period of history I know little about. Crazy to think that Anne only lived to 49!
To answer the question at the end, I think Queen Anne was one of the the greatest monarchs England, Scotland and Ireland, later, Great Britain and Ireland ever had, and are more than often conviently forgotten 😢.
To me this gives Queen Anne justice. That movie (the favourite) ruined her reputation and made her seem like a pointless monarch. This is a fitting tribute.
That disgusting film-The Favourite-could have, like this documentary, told the fascinating story and indeed tragedy of Queen Anne.
Instead it tried to focus its attention on the titillations of her relationship with Sarah Churchill and paint her as a rabid lesbian. I’m gay and find this appalling. Her life was deeply tragic and they could have explored the devastating consequences these events had on her but that would not have suited Hollywoods depraved narratives-and Olivia Coleman was awful as Anne just as she is in most roles.
This was a much more interesting, thoughtful and detailed delve into the life of a very tragic but very important Queen.
There is something which does, but is more obscure. The 70s miniseries ‘The First Churchills’ focuses on Sarah and John Churchill, but covers Anne in great detail to a more reasonably historically accurate degree
@@jasonc9805CHEER'💤 LAD FORE🏌🏻♂️⛳The Reccomend 📺 !Ding😇
@@blahblahblahblah729 Now you are showing your ignorance. Anne was betrayed as an imbecile which she was not. There is no evidence to show that she was a lesbian-many women have very close female friends-that does not make them lesbians.
Olivia was also dreadful as HM Queen Elizabeth in the crown-she does not have the gravitas to play those roles. Helen Mirren on the other hand played The Queen wonderfully and she's a republican(as in anti monarchist as opposed to the political party).
@@blahblahblahblah729 You may think Olivia Coleman is great but just because others don't doesn't mean they are 'hating'. I mean, how old are you? Many people see Olivia Coleman as a formulaic actor who's only real ability is to look like the goddess of resting bitch face with added snot. maybe you are just swayed by popular opinion. She has a bit of talent but her dour on screen presence is a turn off, like those who don't allow people to have preferences and opinions.
People Profiles, Anne, Queen of Great Britain, is my favourite royal and monarch of all time. I have long been asking for you guys to create her a documentary, that one; will be a documentary about her and two; a documentary that could do her justice like only People Profiles can.
I was so happy when you announced and published the Queen Mary II of England documentary, (mainly because there is so little information about her and I knew this will give a better insight into this often forgotten monarch) and wondered how my favourite monarch and royal will overtake that. I didn't even really know how to react on the community post, which I eventually thought the Queen Mary II of England, will remain the more favourable one. After watching this documentary I can say with certainty, it ousted the Queen Mary II of England one. I said it before, and I'm going to say it again; People Profiles, you have outdone yourselves!!! Thank you for providing us with this fantastic throughly researched documentary of Anne, Queen of Great Britain. I enjoyed it it immensely and never have I felt like crying in a documentary, but you even got the sadness of the emotion of loosing so much children onto me. To end off with, all I can say is, People Profiles thank you, thank you, thank you. Thank you so much, you created much joy for a supporter ❤️💙❤️💙❤️💙.
One of the nicest comments we've ever had. Thank you! 🥰
Queen Anne is probably the British monarch I know the least about.
You'd probably have to go back to some obscure Anglo-Saxon king to find a "British" monarch I know less about.
I'm hoping I'll learn enough about Queen Anne that I can at least begin to even have an actual opinion about her.
For those who already watched the video, what did you think?
Best RUclips channel, you have a calming voice ❤❤❤
I liked Queen Anne, she was a strong sensible woman. A shame they didnt have Heperin . If they had , she would have a pretty big family.
Omg, so many children that died. Poor lady. She spent half her life pregnant
THANK YOU!!!!!!
If RUclips channels could receive Oscar's, TPP would have a shelf full
Agreed. I think will have an awards show in the future.
Good God if she wasn’t the most unlucky queen of GB she’s near the top!
Wow!! 17 chidren?! She was not only Queen regnannt, but also Queen pregnant!
FYI: all her pregnancies preceded her reign as queen. As it was, the death of her only remaining child in 1700, prior to her accession, was what led Parliament the following year to pass the Act of Settlement. For although Anne had been heiress apparent to the throne since the death in 1694 of her older sister and guaranteed to succeed (as long as she survived her cousin and brother-in-law, William of Orange), she also seemed likely to die without surviving issue. The purpose of the 1701 Act, then, was to ensure that the crown remain in the hands of Protestants, and not to any Catholic descendant of the Stuarts. As it was, the nearest Protestant relative who was of unquestionably legitimate and royal birth was the Electress Sophia of Hanover.
James V Of Scotland Queen Anne's ancestor was right about the Stuart Dynasty when he lay dying. He said: "it came with a lass and will end with a lass" he was thinking about his daughter Mary with that in mind, but in reality the Dynasty really did end with a girl: Anne Stuart in 1714 when she died without legitimate issue and the throne passed to the house of hanover with the accession of Geroge Louis Prince Elector Of Hanover.
oh, thank you, so much.
any narrations couldn't unvalue a real queen, Queen Anne.
Glad to see you snuck in the tower of joy.
Queen Anna is one of our country’s grate queens of her time 🇬🇧🤍❤️💙🤍❤️🇬🇧
Oh my Lord! Such a tragedy full life…being royal didn’t even help her at all…so sad!
My great great grandmother had 13 pregnancies, but only four of the children survived to adulthood. I can't even begin to imagine such pain. She and Anne sadly appear to have had this in common.
She got pregnant many times, but unfortunately, none of her children survived childhood.
I was watching a documentary about Blackbeard and decided to learn about the monarch he named his ship after
I've stumbled on them on my family tree , via my Scottish ties to the Campbell's , the Duncan's and the McLaughlin and Kennedy clans , who intertwined with royalty . I'm intrigued . Binge watching to try to see how it links up... but I'm very much recognizing our family nose and lip dimple . 😊
Yall never disappoint
Anne was also the last monarch to veto an Act of Parliament by withholding the Royal Assent to the Scottish Militia Act in 1708.
The last Stuart was Henry Stuart the Cardinal King. His brother Charles had an illegitimate daughter.
Last monarch to veto a bill of parliament
What an extraordinary Queen. Such a sad life and much underrated.
I don't know how you cope with losing 16 of 17 children before the age of 2 and the 17th at the age of 11.
That's too much torture for one person surely. You wouldn't blame someone if they never smiled or interacted with the world again.
It's crazy to me that the protestant nobles in England would rather have a continental protestant who didn't even speak English in George I, instead of home grown royal Stuarts with all the prestige and history that came with the family. Religion is nuts. In Scotland, at least, there was still loyalty to the Stuarts. Catholics and Protestants stood behind the dynasty, choosing dynastic loyalty over religion.
You know, The People Profiles, as much as I enjoy these documents of historical monarchs, I have begun to question the term "illegitimate children". As far as I know, legally speaking, all children of their parent are not only allowed to exist but also equally rightful heirs. Whether a child's parents are married or not is not relevant; that person is in any case entitled to an inheritance of his or her father, provided that the paternity is confirmed before the father's death. So the idea that none of Charles II's sons could not become his successor as the king because they were somehow "illegitimate" is ludicrous.
Very well presented
It's a great video ❤🇬🇧
Good. Not “great”.
Anne, are you okay? So, Anne, are you okay? Are you okay, Anne?
In all seriousness Queen Anne had it rough
She might have had rhesus negative blood type..
Olivia Coleman played this role impeccably.
I wouldn't be surprised if James the second had people caring for the children destroy her line. He had serious motive. So did a few others. It's interesting though - it looks like Scotland was starting to develope a democracy at this point! Especially with the Whig party, the Scottish Rite, the Scottish influence in America. And in France - it's like France helped us with the American Revolution and that seriously inspired the French Revolution in Marie Antoinettes time. Queen Anne made a serious impact in politics in spite of her familial losses.
❤poor woman, what a very difficult life.
Is our Princess Anne named after her?
I think it was tragic, but much rather, it was a very brave reign! Who could have soldiered on with all these goings on? Very few!
She certainly had an eye for art
Who narrates this?
THANK YOU
Peace & Enlyghtenment Alwayz
A Micah Hill Dezert-Owl
Search Name
i like your channel
I love your episodes but why don't you have an episode on King George I, King George II.
Poor soul :-(
You need to do biographies of the Hanoverian kings George I and II.
The People Profiles Do King George I (1660-1727; 1714-27) and then George II (1683-1760; 1727-60) please.
I listen to this guy at nite when I can't sleep better than ASMR .... this channel will get more views if you had some that actually doesn't put you to sleep
I do the same sometimes 😂
That movie they made about her several years back blew my mind! lol
*@pentegarn1* Which movie?
*Reply to:* _"That movie they made about her several years back blew my mind! lol"_
@@miyojewoltsnasonth2159 A movie called "The Favorite".
@@pentegarn1 Many thanks! :)
*Reply to:* _"A movie called "The Favorite"."_
Caution: a comment above refers to how horrible this film was. @@miyojewoltsnasonth2159
Did you get it back?
Treaty of Utrecht!!!! I've been to Utrecht!!!
Obsessed.
One day in my house in Spain can heard a big love than a man call name Margarete.
Who went Margaret in England. Please. The love never death. God put in deep air.
Anyone else notice how they painted king Henry viii with a herpes lip?😂😂😂 did him dirty lol he’s got a outbreak in his painting 😂😂
This narrator is so posh I can't handle it. Comparing his accent to my broad, Aussie one is shameful 🤣
Can you do Bach. My parents are fans
Our last ethnically English Monarch.
@@pedanticradiator1491 Indeed yes.
But Anne had an English mother. Ann Hyde. And a half French father.
As did Mary II.
@@pedanticradiator1491 Anne and Mary were James II's daughters by Ann Hyde.
James II's mother was French.
@@pedanticradiator1491 Three English and one Scottish grandparent.
@@pedanticradiator1491 That is why there is an Edit function.
To correct errors.
You can correct yours too
To say Elizabeth II was only 12.5% Scottish.
The last ethnically English monarch was Harold Godwinson
Evidently you forgot about King James VI of Scotland and I of England. As well as Richard Stewart, 1st Earl of Orkney, son of King James V and Euphemia Elphinstone.
🖤 Bday Twin 🖤
I wish you guys would do some biblical figures
I wonder what their real hair looked like 😊
Politics was great at that time.
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰👌👏🙏
That princess was neither a legitimate queen nor was she the last of the Stuarts. There are legitimate Stuart descendants to this day, their chief representative being the legitimate de jure King.
@@pedanticradiator1491 Crazy, isn't it? When the protestants 'ran out' of Stuarts the English brought in a German (descended from the Stuarts, oddly enough). And now going round the other way, the usurped Stuarts' top dog is another German. Poor old England, just can't get away from them.
@@pedanticradiator1491 can't say i blame him.
😪😪😪😪😪
War. Whores. Heirs.
Years of trauma bonds.
Closer and closer to death Anne...
We bred it.
It was the war which cause the outbreaks.
The cause of ALL the years of blood shed.
18:27
All around "religion"