A surprisingly good version, probably more so than the SNES one, although they did have the benefit of hindsight and no doubt far better developer tools at their disposal. (^_~)
@@CinderGamingChannel Indeed, though not half as rushed as the 16-bit computer versions. They may have looked the part, but god were they bloody awful to play. (T_T)
@@CinderGamingChannel Funny, but I watched a playthrough of it quite recently - it's a fairly serviceable version. In truth, when it comes to conversions, I only ever played Final Fight 2 & 3, and I was extremely disappointed with both of them at the time, particularly in comparison to say, Bare Knuckle II. (>_
@@sasamisa1806 Final Fight 2/3, when something doesn't get an arcade release, then you know there is trouble! I don't think there will ever come a time when I'm not a fan of belt scrollers. Have you played any good ones as of late on XBL/PSN?
A surprisingly good version, probably more so than the SNES one, although they did have the benefit of hindsight and no doubt far better developer tools at their disposal. (^_~)
I was surprised by it as well!
I think the SNES version was rushed too?
@@CinderGamingChannel Indeed, though not half as rushed as the 16-bit computer versions. They may have looked the part, but god were they bloody awful to play. (T_T)
Have you ever tried Final Fight Guy?
@@CinderGamingChannel Funny, but I watched a playthrough of it quite recently - it's a fairly serviceable version. In truth, when it comes to conversions, I only ever played Final Fight 2 & 3, and I was extremely disappointed with both of them at the time, particularly in comparison to say, Bare Knuckle II. (>_
@@sasamisa1806
Final Fight 2/3, when something doesn't get an arcade release, then you know there is trouble!
I don't think there will ever come a time when I'm not a fan of belt scrollers. Have you played any good ones as of late on XBL/PSN?