Mahabharat is the leela of lord krishna which he created so that we can learn what mistakes a person should not commit, how a person should behave and teaches many lessons which stands true till today. he wanted to give us the knowledge of divine "Bhagavat Geeta" through the Mahabharata.
video title was about descendants of pandavas and also thumbnail was ... but the entire video is about how mahabharat started , dude what is this wer is the answer who are the descendants ?
While some of us are arguing about not to question Mahabharat or the epic, I believe it's still a part of history along with our beliefs. And we should be so proud that scriptures, epics are being very well studied enriching our heritage. Being a student myself studying the literature and history it is every single time enthralling to delve deep and have new findings. Reading and researching doesn't mean reshaping history or distorting believes, we should embrace it proudly.❤
Dont be blinded by faith. And he never assumed something, its just a theory of his, because its the truth, the winners always write the history, and they write it the way they want to.
@@tanushhj1071 Well not that easy, since the choices you make is a reflection of the way you think..... Duryadhana wasn't profound enough to see through Krishna's wit and he had a grudge on Krishna as well for several reasons.... It's evident he wouldn't have ever chosen Krishna, even if Krishna didn't offer his Narayansena
we want a series on the complete story of mahabharata....because in various books, various versons are written. this will help us understand our own culture and its history more better
mahabharat ni pta? ved vyas ka likha hua ek he mahabharat h or vo version padho. ye log bhi youtube m vhi se padh kr btane wale h na? na ki ved vyas se khud milkar batayenge!!!!!
Please make a whole series on Mahabharat and Ramayana with your visuals. And more videos on "Samudra Manthan", "9999999 gods who were curse", " More stories on Shiv-Vishnu and their different Avatara's purposes and story behind it", and dark side of sadhanas and mantras. Hope you'll consider this and act accordingly. Thankyou
2:58 no it's not right if we try to think like that, then King shantanu (Devrat's father)was the reason who wanted to marry again after went Ganga left him and also having a extraordinary son Devarat... Or even Satyawati's father who had this demand that her daughter kids would rule... I'm trying to say this because then people eventually blame women the cause of destruction... This time it's totally wrong cuz Satyavati's father demanded this not her, and it was the king who wanted to marry her
My grandfather is from meerut, uttar pradesh , however he lived his whole life in jammu kashmir where i was born. when we trace our lineage, it goes back to parikshit, we are believed to be the descendants of arjun and subhadra!
@@nandinijain643 we are living proofs my grandma used to teach vedas, upanishads in Kashmir before genocide 🙄 and have some shame before calling it a propaganda and defending it.
I'm a christian, but I am very much interested in Hindu history.. I love to listening to different history of the hindus.. My father is a pastor but he would educate us about hindus when we were a kid up until now.. my father never said bad things about the hindus..
Hello, brother, I liked what you said, and the teachings your father gave you are also quite meaningful and rooted in values. First, let me clarify that when I mention *Dharma*, I don’t mean what is referred to as 'religion' in today’s terms. The concept of *Dharma* is distinct from what is commonly called religion today. *Dharma* refers to actions that are morally and ethically correct, cause no harm to the environment, do not damage relationships, living beings, someone’s character, or the dignity of a mother. Any action that fulfills these criteria is aligned with *Dharma*. The person who follows these principles in their actions is truly *dharmic*. If you are genuinely interested in learning about these concepts, that’s great-you should pursue that knowledge. However, don't rely on RUclips, TV serials, or movies as your primary sources. Instead, you can explore the original writings. If that’s not possible for you, at least try to read the works of knowledgeable gurus, many of whom have published books. You’ll likely find translations of older texts too, which are available today. Alternatively, choose a publication house known for its authenticity and long-standing reputation. In my opinion, everyone in the world has the freedom to read Hindu scriptures, and there is no compulsion to change one’s belief system after reading them. In fact, many religions offer some degree of freedom, but Hindu traditions provide the most. Studying Hindu teachings will open one’s perspective rather than narrow it. As for *Sanatan Dharma*, it doesn’t belong exclusively to Hindus. *Sanatan Dharma* means the eternal way of life. You probably already understand that 'eternal' refers to something that has always existed and will continue to exist forever. *Sanatan Dharma* represents the principles followed long before today’s religions were established. In ancient times, when modern religions did not exist, humans likely worshipped nature and followed its laws as divine rules. They realized that these principles existed even before humans came into being and would remain valid even after humans are gone. Whether for humans or animals, following these laws led to positive outcomes. That’s why scholars later named it *Sanatan Dharma*.
Since childhood, we have read and learnt about Jesus Christ-his entire story, his life, his character, and his compassionate nature. I have been deeply influenced by his nature behaviour and love for everyone around. It was our parents who taught us to listen to these stories. We were never taught that other religions are inferior. Instead, we were always taught that it is essential to have respect for people of all religions if we want a clean and peaceful society. Comparing whether one religion is better or worse than another is not wise. Just as no person is 100% perfect, no system is 100% efficient or flawless. Religion is also a kind of system that aims to keep society connected and united.
Totally misleading.. so you mean to say if pandavas lost the battle then draupadi cheer haran was right and krishna saved her from that trouble was wrong..? Truth is Krishna was never in the side of pandavas nor kauravas he was in the side of dharma
I agree that Krishna was on Dharma's side but think twice you will see the lack in him as well. Krishna had always given priority to the Pandavas. The whole Mahabharata has not done justice with the Kauravas. What about their part of the story, it is not well narrated. The Kauravas just wanted their legal rights on the throne of Hastinapur that too when Duryodhana was the legitimate crown prince, was it not injustice on Krishna's part to support a side which is into grabbing someone else's property. I recommend you the AJAYA SERIES BOOK by ANAND NEELAKANTAN. You will get to acknowledge an untold story of the Kauravas. This book depicts Mahabharata but from the perspective of Duryodhana. Hope you will like it. It's literally the best mythological fiction I've ever read.
@@kpopsywe182 He didn't just want the legitimate right but he tried to destroy his competition from the area . Do you realise that it wouldn't have even began if Duryodhan didn't do the Lakhya griha thing and then if he had just gave them some small part of the kingdom to rule and stay there same as he gave the kingdom of Anga to Karna ?! (As to Krishna's demand ) It's all about perspective reshaping by authors with different mindsets . If you go to Lanka and read about Ravan he would be recognised as the hero too .
If Kauravas would have won then Krushna not Krishna saving Draupadi part and Draupadi bastraharan part would have vanished from the epic and the same with Lakshya griha , giving poison Laddoo to Vim , Aswathama killing the 5 kids secretly , and Ashwathama using his Brahmastra towards the child would all have been erased from the epic . No matter who wrote it it matters what people get to hear or read in the next generation. Especially a generation who has lost it's identity under foreign rulers it's very natural to go with the available scriptures and we don't even know what's right or wrong at this point .
@@subhakantrout8346 same goes with the Pandavas side. Even on a general basis one has taken over another(competitor) to win. It's fair on Duryodhana's part to think to take over Pandavas.
@@subhakantrout8346 the thing is it should be fairly written. I must recommend the book AJAYA because it has revealed all the untold stories. You must read it once.
"I was casually scrolling and randomly clicked on this video. Oh my god, the sound effects and editing are just amazing! The way they elaborate on the stories and dialogue is so impressive. I haven't come across any other channel like theirs. It's truly awesome!" 🙌🏻.... Please continue this 🙏🏼🫠
Haa maine Dekha Mahabharat Bhishma Pitamah ne Pratigya lithi ki Hastinapur ke singhasan per main nahi bethunga or nahi mera Koi Vansh hoga......... Or Mere Paas Mahabharat Ki Story Book bhi hai Class 7th ki...... 😄 Thanks for Comment Reading Sahi hai toh *PIN* kardna ❤
According to the historians, the Tanwar/ Tomar/ Tuar Clans of Rajputs are descendants of Veer Abhimanyu, The son of Arjun . We from our childhood itself are taught about our family history and we are proud to learn about our great ancestors..!!!
You cleared my doubts because I am from from somavanshi kshatriya clan and we are the descendants of kartiviya arjuna also known as shasra arjuna who was a king who fought with lord parashurama. The influencer mistakened arjuna and shasra arjuna. He should reaserch properly and I am quite honoured to see fellow kshatriya.
@@ankitSinghsayzz._ Bundela clan is a branch of Gaharwar Rajput clan of Vidhyachal region or who are belong to Kashi(benaras), Mirzapur, Prayagraj, etc. Gaharwar is one of the oldest kshatriya clan till existing today. They were the old and real rulers of Kashi(varanasi). Some reports says that after the destruction of Shri Kashi Vishwanath temple by 'Padshah Aurangzeb' Gaharwars lost all control over that area and there state got divided into many parts. After the Aurangzeb invasion to Kashi, many Gaharwars got converted into islam, some of them were migrated to Bihar-Jharkhand... some of them take help from rewa(m.p.) state Baghela king, Chandela kings, and fight back against the invaders and save their territories!! And those states were "Kantit-Vijaypur"(Mirzapur) and Manda(Prayagraj) existed till the Independence of India... The families belongs to these states are the real Gaharwars (They're the descendants of Maharaja Jaychand's younger brother Manikchand of Kannauj). Maharaja Jaychand's descendants got migrated to Rajputana(rajasthan) from Awadh and established their kingdoms. Today we know them as Rathore kshatriya clan!! Yes, Gaharwars and Rathores are brothers, there gotra,ved,ishtdevta,etc are almost same!! They trace their ancestry from Lord Rama's younger son luv. Hence, they belongs to Suryavanshi kshatriya gotra. Historically, they migrated from south(karnataka-maharashtra) region. There recent ancestors were from the Rashtrakutas empire!! There history and legacy is very big, old and glorious!! Many things to share but, not possible here to discuss all the things. Atlast, I'd say if Bundela rajputs are descendants of Gaharwar rajputs then they also belongs to Suryavanshi kshatriya gotra! They can also call themselves as the descendants of lord Rama. Some historians categorized them into Chandravanshi kshatriya because of there later origin! But, I think it's there choice to call themselves Suryavanshi or Chandravanshi... Bundela is amongst one of the newest rajput originated clans!! But, by the fact they're(bundelas) Suryavanshi's for sure!! Gaharwars-Rathores-Bundelas are brothers by ancestral origin!! Thank you!! Hope you like it!!
actually he has done a mistake by calling them somawamshi family becuase I myself am Somawamshi but I am the desendent of kartivya arjuna also known as shasra arjuna. Somawamshi is not family its a clan
4:44 No worries seems google gave me my answer.... should i ttrust google though "Vīrya (Sanskrit वीर्य) literally means "state of a strong man" or "manliness." In Hindu Vedic literature, the term is often associated with heroism and virility. In Brahmacharya in Hinduism, Virya also refers to semen in a male and it is considered to be the 'vital fluid'."
matsya were mermaids who can create healthy beings from humans which has many stories in many cultures around world, even today many sea explorers have experienced their pressence but their proofs are hidden.
Bhai logic ki baat kis se kar raha hai.. 😂😂 Ye pura channel hi pseudo science aur jhoot failane k liya banagya hai.. Also remember no extremely religious person can be logical...
@@Samir12357 bro at that time there was something that we don't have right now so everything can't be logical and he is only narrating what is written in the texts
the book "THE FISHER QUEEN'S DYNASTY" by 'KAVITA KANE' is all about maschyakanya and her journey of becoming the queen of Hastinapur. and I totally agree with this video's perspective. very few knows about her story and suffering she had in her life.
History may be written by winners, but over time we are getting to know about the real History, Indian History as well. But Ithihasa are written by dharma, by dharmics, the fundamental foundation of this mere excistence. Anyone who tries to search the perceptions would only end up in getting wrong understanding or vipareeth gyan..
He is narrating some story. We Asians are all descendents of the rishis and all the avatars of Vishnu. In Bangalore a festival is celebrated for Mother Draupadi by the Vahnikula Kshatriya community, they too have a history and blood of Pandavas.
The descendants of Pandavas are present in the name of Som (Rajput) caste in Meerut district of Uttar Pradesh and also in Rajasthan. 24 village in Uttar Pradesh and 80 village in Rajasthan.
Bada hokar Amir banne ke baad garib ki madad karne vala tha n To pahle amir toh ban tu bol raha hai ki bada hone ke baad pata chala wo garib tu hi hai toh barabr hai n tu garib tha hi pr tune bola pahle amir banunga fir madad karunga. Aur abhi tu bol raha ki mujhe pata chala wo garib mai hi hu kuch sense banta hai iss baat ka?
@@ShreyashPatil1811 हम बचपन में जो ख्वाब देखते थे वो अब बड़ा होकर पता चलता है की कितनी ज्यादा मुश्किल है मैं ये नही कह रहा की मैं वो नही करुगा जो मैं बचपन में सोचता था मैं बस अभी के अपने हालात बयान कर रहा हु बात की गहराई से समझो तब समझ में आयेगी 🙏🏼
Hello, the Kauravs are still in existence, and our complete lineage has been documented for approximately 700 or 800 years. Additionally, until the past decade, most of our marriages were within the Kaurav community but in different lineages.
You didn’t mention one important- Mahabharat and Ramayan all happened due to the greed of Rajya, Fame and Glory for sons of Satyavati and Kakaiii. This is deep and best conclusion and learning I got to know from Our main religious books.
Sab Swarg gaye ....Ashwathama next Ved Vyas Ji banengey unka pachsyatap purn kar .....Ye ek vidhi rachit kaal avdhi samapan ka marg raha ...sab Dev putr ban apna roleplay kiye ...🎉 Mahabharat se seekh le saktey hain ...kya karna aur kaisey karna hai.....ke apna aur samaaj ka marg saral aur satya pe ho.... Vishleshan swayam ke jeevan aur Mahabharat ke kaunsey role se khudh ko deakhtey ho aur kaisey mukt rehtey ho karm bandhan se ye bhi kiya ja sakta hai.... Thank you for reading comment. Am a learner and welcome your response to improve myself🙏🌹🌹
I believe it started much earlier, 4 gens before, when Shakuntala cursed her son Bharat, for not giving the throne to his own sons, but to his adopted son Vitatha, which he favored above his own sons. Every successor from here on, thus including Shantanu and his descendants, are not of the true royal bloodline, but of an outsider... This my opinion...
One dominoes up “ In the Mahabharata, Ganga married King Shantanu and agreed to be the mother of eight Vasus, celestial beings cursed to be born as mortals. As part of an agreement with Shantanu, she drowned seven of the children in the river to free them from the curse, causing her to appear as if she was washing them away. When Shantanu questioned her actions upon the birth of the eighth child, Bhishma, Ganga left him but later returned Bhishma after educating him.
This world is full of Illusions, there is lot of history about Truth... But humans and other's species will never able, to find out the truth, in their whole 7th births... World is full of thing's that Human can't even believe it... Thanks and loved your content as always...more power to your team 👍
Very true we can’t ask proof for everything there is more unseen and unproven stuff on this world . Scientists still can’t give a reasonable explanation to certain mysteries on our world 🙏
कोटि कोटि धन्यवाद जो आपने अपनी जान जोखिम मे डालकर इतनी महत्वपूर्ण सुचना हमें दी। ये अद्भुत समाचार सुनकर तीनों लोको मे बहुत प्रसन्नता हैं । समस्त नर , नारी , सुर , असुर , देवता , मुनि , गंधर्व प्रसन्न हुए । आपके समाचार को सुनकर पुरें ब्रह्माण्ड मे प्रसन्नता हैं पुरा संसार प्रकाशमान हो गया हैं। आपका यह समाचार प्रशंसनीय एवं अविस्मरणीय हैं मानो चारों ओर एक दिव्य ज्योति प्रजवल्लित हुई हो। आगे भी सृष्टि के कल्याण हेतू ऐसे समाचार देते रहे। तीनो लोक आपके ऋणी रहेंगे । इतनी ज़रूरी ओर मानव जाति हेतु कल्याणकारी खबर देने के लिए आप का बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद । अगर ये खबर भारत के लोगो को ना मिलती तो भारत की समस्त मानव और जीव जाती अपने समूचे जीवन अज्ञान के घोर अंधकार में डूबी रहती। आपने अपने दिव्य खबर के प्रकाश से उस अंधकार को समाप्त कर दिया है: भारत की समस्त जनता आप की सदा ऋणी रहेगी ।
This is a good “What if” but again it is Absolutely absurd comparing Sri Krishna and Shakuni. Mahabharata is a Dharma Yudh and Sri Krishna is Dharma. Shakuni is being glamorised for no reason.
Impressive.... The way explaining.... Intresting too.... Please upload more video on it... I want to know more...i have many questions regarding mahabharat want to clear it...Subscribed you .. Please go for it
Also want to add that Pandavas cannot have Ved Vyas genes because they were not Pandu's sons. The were DEMI gods, half gods( Indra, Vayu, Ashwin the twins, Progeny). If devas are aliens then Pandavas were half aliens. So by that logic there are aliens walking amongst us, right now. Pandavas basically had no claim to the throne, simply because they were not their father's son.
Next video राजा उपरिचरहा pe banaye.. It will lead you guys towards the birth of Vishwamitra's & Menka's born child Shakuntala & her Son "चक्रवर्ती महाराज भरत् " Jispe hamara desh ka naam pada..
Hence, it is proven that it is not necessary to have good information or content for RUclips videos.... You can just use a religious thumbnail and caption along with good communication skills, editing, and AI for pictures...The only thing that I like about this video is its disclaimer
Pehle hoti thi aise. Jaise Hanuman ji ke paseene ki ek boond ko ek machli ne nigal liya tha usse fir vo machli garbhvati hui thi. Jisne aage chalke Makardhwaj ko janm diya jo ki ekdum Hanuman ji ke jaise dikhta tha or vo pataal lok me rehta tha. Pehle ke logo ko siddhi prapt thi is wajah se vo aise kar paate the.
Ese hi nahi bolte tumko andhbhakt😂pehle ho jata tha machli se insan peda abhi kese nahi hota ,mukh se ,nabhi se ,sare jagah se peda ho gaye the ,hadd he Bhai pakhand ka bhi limit nahi he , science ka maa behen kar rahe he gobar bhakt😂tu ek kaam kar ,tu machli me ,aur dusre jib jantu me birya khila apna phir dekh ke wanha se insan peda hota ke nahi he 🤣baad me aake gobar gyan Dena ....ok@@silent_rider_12
@@new_updates23 Abe chomu kabhi Jal pari ka naam suna hai? Jal pari pehle Treta yug me or dwapar yug me bohot hoti thi. Ab bhi hai lekin ab bohot kam hai. To vo jal pari ne consume kar liya tha raja ka virya jisse do judwa baccche hue the. Jakar poori story dekh.
@@silent_rider_12 tere baton se pata chal ta he tu he to gawar aur upar se andhbhakt ,pehli baat jalpari to he nahi wo bhi kalpanik hai , aj tak koi nahi dekha dusri baat jalpari consumer kar liya matlab kya muh se nigal ne se bacha peda ho jata he kya , sale tum andhbhakt aur kuch pakhand baba ke wajah se aj santan ka mazak ban ta he .
can you make a video about if karna was in pandavas side shree krisna challenegd shakuni for game f dice all that make what if series for mahbharat and ramayan
Lovely Also i would like to share that my Family is also one of the descendants of Pandavs we come from the Tomar Rajvansh of Gwalior but we live in Rajasthan.
It is about "dekhane ka najariya" it's all about right and wrong...you can't compare lord Krishna with Shakuni. Shakuni apnea behen ki andh Dritrashta ke saath hui shaadi ke Bradley ke bhaav se samasta hastinapur ke kul ka Nash karne ke hetu se ladhaai ladi thi woh na kauravo ke saath tha na paandav ke saath tha, but lord krishna fought against adharma not against mankind.
I love listening to podcast while cooking and one fine day i found a podcast on mahabarata i got so dwelled into it. Originally mahabarata was written from a male perspective. Surprisingly i found this book the palace of illusion by chitra banarjee which tells the story of mahabarata from draupati’s perspective. Before reading and listening to podcast i know the basics of it. Mahabarata is caused due to draupati. But i kept questioning agar usney yeah nehi kiya hota to mahabarat ho kya, is it really draupati which lead the great battle about righteousness. At some point i blame beeshma.
ভাই, আপনি যুক্তি-তর্কের সহিত একদম ঠিকই বলেছেন, এই video তে বর্ণিত বিষয় গুলি আমি অন্য source থেকেও জেনেছি, মহাভারতের প্রতি পদক্ষেপেই অবৈধ সংগমের কথা জানা যায়, যাহা সাধারণ পাঠ্য মহাভারতে পাওয়া যায় না
Lakshya’s lakshya is to sell his book, Mahabharata was just a pretext. No mentions of which Mahabharata editions he went through. And best of all, only a one-line mention in the passing of the descendants of Arjun. Deplorable motive, regurgitative stories.
Maine bhi Mahabharat par kafi research ki thi or jab mujhe ye stories pata chali to mai bhi kafi hairan ho gya tha 😅 Aaj wahi stories yha dikh rhi h 🙌🏻
Rani Lakshmi bai lost her war... history don't see her as bad person... History sees her as a hero... Just because some one losses a fight don't mean that they are on the side of adharma... History remembers by karma of dharma... not other wise
Actually my ancestors are also from Pratapgarh UP & we have direct blood relation with Arjun.😊 We are also Som vanshi Rajput. Our gautra was Baiaghrapad same as Bhishma Pitamah😊
Mate 😂😂 if you really want to meet the real descents of pandavs and kuroves, then visit Uttarakhand. We have plenty of them. We have their temples to, even for kuroves and they them self's live with us and help us in many ways.
Har jagah bss Jaipur ki royal family, unki hi photo lagate jao, shree ram ke vanshaj bhi wahi, pandavo ke vanshaj bhi wahi aur koi hoge to unke bhi vanshaj bana lo unko. Hadd hai
Let me tell you another thing, Satyavati was not some random King's Daughter. She was Rishi Parashar's Daughter, about whom he wasn't aware. Call it whatever you will, Parashar was Satyavati's father and the father of Ved Vyas too. The Veerya story is true, only it was Rishi Parashar's , and not a king's.
Jiske saath svayam Shri krishn ho wo toh avashya hi jeetenge or wo kabhi bhi adhram ka saath de hi nii sakte hai. It's your perception of seeing things which I respect but Krishn will never be on the wrong side. 🚩🕉️
A lot of hindu fanatics can't stand the fact that if pandavs lost the war then krishna would suffer shakuni's fate but that is how it should be looked at objectively.... look at any wars and you'd know that history is written by the victors
Im giving you forewarning to remove this line 00:57 "if kaurav win the the whole scenario will be different ITs about the worng and write and you can not compare shree krishna with shakuni
I dont agree with your opening statement. You said history was written bcoz pandav won. But history was written by maharishi ved vyas ji, who was neutral to both sides and he was grandfather of both kauravas and pandavas.
Absolutely. How disturbing thoughts like Shakuni Krishna ban jata 😂..bhai ne kuch alag krne ke chakkar me Mahabharat ka saar hi bdl dala.. No body can or will be like Krishna.
@@RahulKumar-xe9ceif I'm wrong plasee correct me krishna was just coach master in this epic tournament supporting his fellows in time to time what these people thought that he was a just a coach but didn't know that the coach itself is the god
Bhai sahab Bhimasen too had descendants through Jalandhara (Valandhara) and Hidimbaa Yudhishthir had a daughter through Draupadi who married one of the sons of Lord Krishna Other brothers also had descendants The point is that Parikshit's progeny were not just only descendants
There's no comparison Shakuni was evil, with evil deeds and intentions. Sri Krishna Bhagwan is the Lord himself he is not good or nor evil. He decended on earth to teach us about right and wrong. Dharma or adharam and karma yog. He gifted us Sri mad Bhagvat Gita.
Are bhai, wo to galat bol hi rha hai. Pehle yeh batao, kya koi machli manushya ko paida kar sakti hai? 😅 Aur ye bhaisab, Arjun k vanshajo se milkar aye hai.
If Pandavas were defeated, then Krishna himself would have ended the war. There were many attempts from Krishna's side, and others to stop the war from happening; however, Dhuriyodana was persistent, and this left Kirshna with no choice.
What logic is this if satyawati being born is the first domino then why can't shantanu being born be the first domino? Even after draupadi vastraharan and vanvas when pandavas returned they had peacefully asked for their kingdom back. If someone could have convinced duryodhan to give it back then , then also mahabharat could have been avoided. you can't give an initial domino in this case as any prior point can be called an initial domino. If king hastin hadnt created hastinapur then there wouldn't have been an hastinapur and therefore no mahabharat. there can be a definite last nail in the coffin which was the rejection of peace offer brought by Krishna
Mahabharat was not written by Pandavas, it was narrated by Ved Vyas and written by Lord Ganesh
It was narrated by Ganesh ji and written by ved Vyas
Likhne mai thori gadbad ho gyi😂
@@sohamboyee2973no brother it was narrated by vedvyas and written by bhagwan ganesh
@@subinshrestha7441true
@@sohamboyee2973 ur wrong
@@subinshrestha7441 yes true lord ganesha wrote it nonstop and vedvyas narrated it non stop
Mahabharat is the leela of lord krishna which he created so that we can learn what mistakes a person should not commit, how a person should behave and teaches many lessons which stands true till today.
he wanted to give us the knowledge of divine "Bhagavat Geeta" through the Mahabharata.
Yes ya he log samaj nahi pate agar lo appna nazaria sa soch na lag gai to Satya aur asatya ka astitva he mit jayega jai shree ram 🚩
exactly this is true essence of Mahabharata
video title was about descendants of pandavas and also thumbnail was ... but the entire video is about how mahabharat started , dude what is this wer is the answer who are the descendants ?
These people do thos often these days, use Clickbait thumbnails and go to see the video is abt something else!!!
i am a kourav myself so yeah i am a descendant
wer is sperm
i think he indirectly said i gave you intro now if you wanna know about descendants go and read the book
We saw a picture of Pandavas descendants in the thumbnail and what the f*** am I watching
😂😂😂😂😂😂
While some of us are arguing about not to question Mahabharat or the epic, I believe it's still a part of history along with our beliefs. And we should be so proud that scriptures, epics are being very well studied enriching our heritage. Being a student myself studying the literature and history it is every single time enthralling to delve deep and have new findings. Reading and researching doesn't mean reshaping history or distorting believes, we should embrace it proudly.❤
Don't add your perceptions of what would have been right or wrong here. Here Lord Krishna was involved himself and he would never support wrong.
Then if Duryodhana would have chosen Sri Krishna instead of Narayani Sena, Krishna then would've supported Duryodhana? Wouldn't that become wrong?
Dont be blinded by faith. And he never assumed something, its just a theory of his, because its the truth, the winners always write the history, and they write it the way they want to.
@@Grimsyreaper You said it correctly bro!
@@tanushhj1071 Well not that easy, since the choices you make is a reflection of the way you think..... Duryadhana wasn't profound enough to see through Krishna's wit and he had a grudge on Krishna as well for several reasons.... It's evident he wouldn't have ever chosen Krishna, even if Krishna didn't offer his Narayansena
Not at all
He would have refused@@tanushhj1071
we want a series on the complete story of mahabharata....because in various books, various versons are written. this will help us understand our own culture and its history more better
Agreed
Bhai Gitapress se pdh lo. Ye log b bht glt glt batate h so better khud hi pdhlo.
mahabharat ni pta? ved vyas ka likha hua ek he mahabharat h or vo version padho. ye log bhi youtube m vhi se padh kr btane wale h na? na ki ved vyas se khud milkar batayenge!!!!!
@@iamtrishaasingh thanks
@@setuk29 asli ramayan mahavharat puran eshob pobitro dharmagrantha mujhe kaha mile ga. Mein parna chahti hu main bangali hu
Please make a whole series on Mahabharat and Ramayana with your visuals.
And more videos on "Samudra Manthan", "9999999 gods who were curse", " More stories on Shiv-Vishnu and their different Avatara's purposes and story behind it", and dark side of sadhanas and mantras.
Hope you'll consider this and act accordingly. Thankyou
2:58 no it's not right if we try to think like that, then King shantanu (Devrat's father)was the reason who wanted to marry again after went Ganga left him and also having a extraordinary son Devarat...
Or even Satyawati's father who had this demand that her daughter kids would rule...
I'm trying to say this because then people eventually blame women the cause of destruction...
This time it's totally wrong cuz Satyavati's father demanded this not her, and it was the king who wanted to marry her
i think the main reason was stayavati's biological father i means what kind of letter or present he wanted to send his wife
My grandfather is from meerut,
uttar pradesh , however he lived his whole life in jammu kashmir where i was born. when we trace our lineage, it goes back to parikshit, we are believed to be the descendants of arjun and subhadra!
Kashmir pandit?
@sujanagadi6301 No
What proof do you have?
@@nandinijain643 we are living proofs my grandma used to teach vedas, upanishads in Kashmir before genocide 🙄 and have some shame before calling it a propaganda and defending it.
@nandinijain643 how do u trace your lineage?
I'm a christian, but I am very much interested in Hindu history.. I love to listening to different history of the hindus.. My father is a pastor but he would educate us about hindus when we were a kid up until now.. my father never said bad things about the hindus..
The truth is one but the paths to it are many your father understand it
Ghar wapsi
Good..better convert to Hinduism first and then start propogate in your country
Hello, brother, I liked what you said, and the teachings your father gave you are also quite meaningful and rooted in values. First, let me clarify that when I mention *Dharma*, I don’t mean what is referred to as 'religion' in today’s terms. The concept of *Dharma* is distinct from what is commonly called religion today. *Dharma* refers to actions that are morally and ethically correct, cause no harm to the environment, do not damage relationships, living beings, someone’s character, or the dignity of a mother. Any action that fulfills these criteria is aligned with *Dharma*. The person who follows these principles in their actions is truly *dharmic*.
If you are genuinely interested in learning about these concepts, that’s great-you should pursue that knowledge. However, don't rely on RUclips, TV serials, or movies as your primary sources. Instead, you can explore the original writings. If that’s not possible for you, at least try to read the works of knowledgeable gurus, many of whom have published books. You’ll likely find translations of older texts too, which are available today. Alternatively, choose a publication house known for its authenticity and long-standing reputation.
In my opinion, everyone in the world has the freedom to read Hindu scriptures, and there is no compulsion to change one’s belief system after reading them. In fact, many religions offer some degree of freedom, but Hindu traditions provide the most. Studying Hindu teachings will open one’s perspective rather than narrow it.
As for *Sanatan Dharma*, it doesn’t belong exclusively to Hindus. *Sanatan Dharma* means the eternal way of life. You probably already understand that 'eternal' refers to something that has always existed and will continue to exist forever. *Sanatan Dharma* represents the principles followed long before today’s religions were established. In ancient times, when modern religions did not exist, humans likely worshipped nature and followed its laws as divine rules. They realized that these principles existed even before humans came into being and would remain valid even after humans are gone. Whether for humans or animals, following these laws led to positive outcomes. That’s why scholars later named it *Sanatan Dharma*.
Since childhood, we have read and learnt about Jesus Christ-his entire story, his life, his character, and his compassionate nature. I have been deeply influenced by his nature behaviour and love for everyone around. It was our parents who taught us to listen to these stories. We were never taught that other religions are inferior. Instead, we were always taught that it is essential to have respect for people of all religions if we want a clean and peaceful society. Comparing whether one religion is better or worse than another is not wise. Just as no person is 100% perfect, no system is 100% efficient or flawless. Religion is also a kind of system that aims to keep society connected and united.
Totally misleading.. so you mean to say if pandavas lost the battle then draupadi cheer haran was right and krishna saved her from that trouble was wrong..? Truth is Krishna was never in the side of pandavas nor kauravas he was in the side of dharma
I agree that Krishna was on Dharma's side but think twice you will see the lack in him as well. Krishna had always given priority to the Pandavas. The whole Mahabharata has not done justice with the Kauravas. What about their part of the story, it is not well narrated. The Kauravas just wanted their legal rights on the throne of Hastinapur that too when Duryodhana was the legitimate crown prince, was it not injustice on Krishna's part to support a side which is into grabbing someone else's property. I recommend you the AJAYA SERIES BOOK by ANAND NEELAKANTAN. You will get to acknowledge an untold story of the Kauravas. This book depicts Mahabharata but from the perspective of Duryodhana. Hope you will like it. It's literally the best mythological fiction I've ever read.
@@kpopsywe182 He didn't just want the legitimate right but he tried to destroy his competition from the area .
Do you realise that it wouldn't have even began if Duryodhan didn't do the Lakhya griha thing and then if he had just gave them some small part of the kingdom to rule and stay there same as he gave the kingdom of Anga to Karna ?!
(As to Krishna's demand )
It's all about perspective reshaping by authors with different mindsets .
If you go to Lanka and read about Ravan he would be recognised as the hero too .
If Kauravas would have won then Krushna not Krishna saving Draupadi part and Draupadi bastraharan part would have vanished from the epic and the same with Lakshya griha , giving poison Laddoo to Vim , Aswathama killing the 5 kids secretly , and Ashwathama using his Brahmastra towards the child would all have been erased from the epic .
No matter who wrote it it matters what people get to hear or read in the next generation.
Especially a generation who has lost it's identity under foreign rulers it's very natural to go with the available scriptures and we don't even know what's right or wrong at this point .
@@subhakantrout8346 same goes with the Pandavas side. Even on a general basis one has taken over another(competitor) to win. It's fair on Duryodhana's part to think to take over Pandavas.
@@subhakantrout8346 the thing is it should be fairly written. I must recommend the book AJAYA because it has revealed all the untold stories. You must read it once.
This was a nice “WHAT IF?” kinda video resembled a lot like Marvel’s WHAT IF series. 😅
"I was casually scrolling and randomly clicked on this video. Oh my god, the sound effects and editing are just amazing! The way they elaborate on the stories and dialogue is so impressive. I haven't come across any other channel like theirs. It's truly awesome!" 🙌🏻.... Please continue this 🙏🏼🫠
0:13 change your word it's not story it's realty
Haa maine Dekha Mahabharat Bhishma Pitamah ne Pratigya lithi ki Hastinapur ke singhasan per main nahi bethunga or nahi mera Koi Vansh hoga......... Or Mere Paas Mahabharat Ki Story Book bhi hai Class 7th ki...... 😄 Thanks for Comment Reading Sahi hai toh *PIN* kardna ❤
But dekha jaye kuruvansh ke asli vansaj to kewal bhisma the
Wo kaise ?@@poojachandrakantsingh8723
According to the historians, the Tanwar/ Tomar/ Tuar Clans of Rajputs are descendants of Veer Abhimanyu, The son of Arjun . We from our childhood itself are taught about our family history and we are proud to learn about our great ancestors..!!!
Yes, that's true! Tomar clan of Rajputs are the descendants of Pandavas! They're top of the Chandravanshi Kshatriya clans.
You cleared my doubts because I am from from somavanshi kshatriya clan and we are the descendants of kartiviya arjuna also known as shasra arjuna who was a king who fought with lord parashurama. The influencer mistakened arjuna and shasra arjuna. He should reaserch properly and I am quite honoured to see fellow kshatriya.
@@AyushSingh-ch2eiWhat about Bundela Rajputs??
@@ankitSinghsayzz._ Bundela clan is a branch of Gaharwar Rajput clan of Vidhyachal region or who are belong to Kashi(benaras), Mirzapur, Prayagraj, etc. Gaharwar is one of the oldest kshatriya clan till existing today. They were the old and real rulers of Kashi(varanasi). Some reports says that after the destruction of Shri Kashi Vishwanath temple by 'Padshah Aurangzeb' Gaharwars lost all control over that area and there state got divided into many parts. After the Aurangzeb invasion to Kashi, many Gaharwars got converted into islam, some of them were migrated to Bihar-Jharkhand... some of them take help from rewa(m.p.) state Baghela king, Chandela kings, and fight back against the invaders and save their territories!! And those states were "Kantit-Vijaypur"(Mirzapur) and Manda(Prayagraj) existed till the Independence of India... The families belongs to these states are the real Gaharwars (They're the descendants of Maharaja Jaychand's younger brother Manikchand of Kannauj). Maharaja Jaychand's descendants got migrated to Rajputana(rajasthan) from Awadh and established their kingdoms. Today we know them as Rathore kshatriya clan!!
Yes, Gaharwars and Rathores are brothers, there gotra,ved,ishtdevta,etc are almost same!!
They trace their ancestry from Lord Rama's younger son luv. Hence, they belongs to Suryavanshi kshatriya gotra.
Historically, they migrated from south(karnataka-maharashtra) region. There recent ancestors were from the Rashtrakutas empire!! There history and legacy is very big, old and glorious!! Many things to share but, not possible here to discuss all the things.
Atlast, I'd say if Bundela rajputs are descendants of Gaharwar rajputs then they also belongs to Suryavanshi kshatriya gotra! They can also call themselves as the descendants of lord Rama. Some historians categorized them into Chandravanshi kshatriya because of there later origin! But, I think it's there choice to call themselves Suryavanshi or Chandravanshi... Bundela is amongst one of the newest rajput originated clans!!
But, by the fact they're(bundelas) Suryavanshi's for sure!! Gaharwars-Rathores-Bundelas are brothers by ancestral origin!!
Thank you!! Hope you like it!!
Unke descents ke baare me bilkul nhi bataya aur na hi unki photos dikhai 😠🤬😡
actually he has done a mistake by calling them somawamshi family becuase I myself am Somawamshi but I am the desendent of kartivya arjuna also known as shasra arjuna. Somawamshi is not family its a clan
@@neetfix1498 Prashar agar ved vyas ji ke descendants hai toh iss hisab se mai bhi hua fir
Mera gotr Prashar hai
@@amoghshidling1804 Yes you are right, l'm also soamwanshi and my relatives use Soam as their surname. We are basically from Meerut UP.
@@neetfix1498I am Chandravanshi Bundela Rajput aur mera bhi gotra Parashar hai Jai Shree Ram🚩🚩💪
sab ke sab ved vyas ke bloodine se ho brahman not somvanshi..
Om Nama Narayan 🙏 it's unbelievable how possible.😮
Hare krishna🙏❤Radhe Radhe🙏❤
4:44 No worries seems google gave me my answer.... should i ttrust google though "Vīrya (Sanskrit वीर्य) literally means "state of a strong man" or "manliness." In Hindu Vedic literature, the term is often associated with heroism and virility. In Brahmacharya in Hinduism, Virya also refers to semen in a male and it is considered to be the 'vital fluid'."
It simply means that the king masturbated fantasising about his wife.
matsya were mermaids who can create healthy beings from humans which has many stories in many cultures around world, even today many sea explorers have experienced their pressence but their proofs are hidden.
FISH GIVING BIRTH TO A HUMAN BEING IS JUST SOMETHING REALLY ILLOGICAL.
Bhai logic ki baat kis se kar raha hai.. 😂😂
Ye pura channel hi pseudo science aur jhoot failane k liya banagya hai..
Also remember no extremely religious person can be logical...
@@Samir12357 bro at that time there was something that we don't have right now so everything can't be logical and he is only narrating what is written in the texts
the book "THE FISHER QUEEN'S DYNASTY" by 'KAVITA KANE' is all about maschyakanya and her journey of becoming the queen of Hastinapur. and I totally agree with this video's perspective. very few knows about her story and suffering she had in her life.
Good analysis. Only ill say that nothing happens without any reason. Sab purwa nischet that. Niyati the. Krishna hamesha dharma ke sath he rahete🙏
History may be written by winners, but over time we are getting to know about the real History, Indian History as well. But Ithihasa are written by dharma, by dharmics, the fundamental foundation of this mere excistence. Anyone who tries to search the perceptions would only end up in getting wrong understanding or vipareeth gyan..
He is narrating some story. We Asians are all descendents of the rishis and all the avatars of Vishnu. In Bangalore a festival is celebrated for Mother Draupadi by the Vahnikula Kshatriya community, they too have a history and blood of Pandavas.
Hum kisi ek ko galat nhi keh skte, sb ne apne situation k hisab se respond kiya, chahta to hr koi Mahabharat rok skta, ruka nahi kyun ki honi h..
Exactly
The descendants of Pandavas are present in the name of Som (Rajput) caste in Meerut district of Uttar Pradesh and also in Rajasthan. 24 village in Uttar Pradesh and 80 village in Rajasthan.
Miss leading title.please don't use this trick.
Mahabharat is the most romantic epic ever written-- dealing with the leelas of Lord Krishna ❤❤❤❤
बचपन में मैं सोचता था बड़ा होकर बहुत अमीर बनूंगा और गरीबों की मदद किया करूंगा 😍
अब बड़ा होकर पता चला की वो गरीब मैं ही हूं 😢
😊
I feel for you, hope you feel for me too bro. Because I am also like you
Aisi soch rakhte ho toh tum gareeb nahi ameer ho....
Bada hokar Amir banne ke baad garib ki madad karne vala tha n
To pahle amir toh ban tu bol raha hai ki bada hone ke baad pata chala wo garib tu hi hai toh barabr hai n tu garib tha hi pr tune bola pahle amir banunga fir madad karunga. Aur abhi tu bol raha ki mujhe pata chala wo garib mai hi hu kuch sense banta hai iss baat ka?
@@ShreyashPatil1811 हम बचपन में जो ख्वाब देखते थे वो अब बड़ा होकर पता चलता है की कितनी ज्यादा मुश्किल है
मैं ये नही कह रहा की मैं वो नही करुगा जो मैं बचपन में सोचता था
मैं बस अभी के अपने हालात बयान कर रहा हु
बात की गहराई से समझो तब समझ में आयेगी
🙏🏼
@@ShivamPatel-uw8go सब अच्छा करेंगे श्री हरी 🙏🏼🤗
Hello, the Kauravs are still in existence, and our complete lineage has been documented for approximately 700 or 800 years. Additionally, until the past decade, most of our marriages were within the Kaurav community but in different lineages.
Our gotra is also..parasar..(origin of parasya Rishi.. father of vedvyas)
You didn’t mention one important- Mahabharat and Ramayan all happened due to the greed of Rajya, Fame and Glory for sons of Satyavati and Kakaiii.
This is deep and best conclusion and learning I got to know from Our main religious books.
Are we going to see an entire series of this video about Mahabharata?
Would you want to see a series on Mahabharat?
@@RAAAZofficialyes please
@RAAAZofficial Yes, please
Yes 👍🏻
Sab Swarg gaye ....Ashwathama next Ved Vyas Ji banengey unka pachsyatap purn kar .....Ye ek vidhi rachit kaal avdhi samapan ka marg raha ...sab Dev putr ban apna roleplay kiye ...🎉
Mahabharat se seekh le saktey hain ...kya karna aur kaisey karna hai.....ke apna aur samaaj ka marg saral aur satya pe ho....
Vishleshan swayam ke jeevan aur Mahabharat ke kaunsey role se khudh ko deakhtey ho aur kaisey mukt rehtey ho karm bandhan se ye bhi kiya ja sakta hai....
Thank you for reading comment. Am a learner and welcome your response to improve myself🙏🌹🌹
After soooooooo long.. ek sahi video dali hai.. keep going👏 literally bhot engaging and interesting video thi🫡🫡
I believe it started much earlier, 4 gens before, when Shakuntala cursed her son Bharat, for not giving the throne to his own sons, but to his adopted son Vitatha, which he favored above his own sons. Every successor from here on, thus including Shantanu and his descendants, are not of the true royal bloodline, but of an outsider... This my opinion...
3:55 PYAR ❌ Tharak ✅
One dominoes up “ In the Mahabharata, Ganga married King Shantanu and agreed to be the mother of eight Vasus, celestial beings cursed to be born as mortals. As part of an agreement with Shantanu, she drowned seven of the children in the river to free them from the curse, causing her to appear as if she was washing them away. When Shantanu questioned her actions upon the birth of the eighth child, Bhishma, Ganga left him but later returned Bhishma after educating him.
This world is full of Illusions, there is lot of history about Truth...
But humans and other's species will never able, to find out the truth, in their whole 7th births...
World is full of thing's that Human can't even believe it...
Thanks and loved your content as always...more power to your team 👍
Very true we can’t ask proof for everything there is more unseen and unproven stuff on this world . Scientists still can’t give a reasonable explanation to certain mysteries on our world 🙏
कोटि कोटि धन्यवाद जो आपने अपनी जान जोखिम मे डालकर इतनी महत्वपूर्ण सुचना हमें दी। ये अद्भुत समाचार सुनकर तीनों लोको मे बहुत प्रसन्नता हैं । समस्त नर , नारी , सुर , असुर , देवता , मुनि , गंधर्व प्रसन्न हुए । आपके समाचार को सुनकर पुरें ब्रह्माण्ड मे प्रसन्नता हैं पुरा संसार प्रकाशमान हो गया हैं। आपका यह समाचार प्रशंसनीय एवं अविस्मरणीय हैं मानो चारों ओर एक दिव्य ज्योति प्रजवल्लित हुई हो। आगे भी सृष्टि के कल्याण हेतू ऐसे समाचार देते रहे। तीनो लोक आपके ऋणी रहेंगे ।
इतनी ज़रूरी ओर मानव जाति हेतु कल्याणकारी खबर देने के लिए आप का बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद । अगर ये खबर भारत के लोगो को ना मिलती तो भारत की समस्त मानव और जीव जाती अपने समूचे जीवन अज्ञान के घोर अंधकार में डूबी रहती। आपने अपने दिव्य खबर के प्रकाश से उस अंधकार को समाप्त कर दिया है: भारत की समस्त जनता आप की सदा ऋणी रहेगी ।
aiyen?
yh sarcasm hai kya?
This is a good “What if” but again it is Absolutely absurd comparing Sri Krishna and Shakuni. Mahabharata is a Dharma Yudh and Sri Krishna is Dharma. Shakuni is being glamorised for no reason.
What a complicated story....!!😮😮
Impressive.... The way explaining.... Intresting too.... Please upload more video on it... I want to know more...i have many questions regarding mahabharat want to clear it...Subscribed you .. Please go for it
Also want to add that Pandavas cannot have Ved Vyas genes because they were not Pandu's sons. The were DEMI gods, half gods( Indra, Vayu, Ashwin the twins, Progeny). If devas are aliens then Pandavas were half aliens. So by that logic there are aliens walking amongst us, right now. Pandavas basically had no claim to the throne, simply because they were not their father's son.
Next video राजा उपरिचरहा pe banaye.. It will lead you guys towards the birth of Vishwamitra's & Menka's born child Shakuntala & her Son "चक्रवर्ती महाराज भरत् " Jispe hamara desh ka naam pada..
Hence, it is proven that it is not necessary to have good information or content for RUclips videos.... You can just use a religious thumbnail and caption along with good communication skills, editing, and AI for pictures...The only thing that I like about this video is its disclaimer
Raja je veerya se machli garbhvati hui 😂😂 I can’t believe this 😅😅
Pehle hoti thi aise. Jaise Hanuman ji ke paseene ki ek boond ko ek machli ne nigal liya tha usse fir vo machli garbhvati hui thi. Jisne aage chalke Makardhwaj ko janm diya jo ki ekdum Hanuman ji ke jaise dikhta tha or vo pataal lok me rehta tha. Pehle ke logo ko siddhi prapt thi is wajah se vo aise kar paate the.
Ese hi nahi bolte tumko andhbhakt😂pehle ho jata tha machli se insan peda abhi kese nahi hota ,mukh se ,nabhi se ,sare jagah se peda ho gaye the ,hadd he Bhai pakhand ka bhi limit nahi he , science ka maa behen kar rahe he gobar bhakt😂tu ek kaam kar ,tu machli me ,aur dusre jib jantu me birya khila apna phir dekh ke wanha se insan peda hota ke nahi he 🤣baad me aake gobar gyan Dena ....ok@@silent_rider_12
Admin bhi ese hi 😺, 🐕, 🐐, 🐟,kisi se peda hua hoga phir , isiliye wo gyan bant raha he 😂
@@new_updates23 Abe chomu kabhi Jal pari ka naam suna hai? Jal pari pehle Treta yug me or dwapar yug me bohot hoti thi. Ab bhi hai lekin ab bohot kam hai. To vo jal pari ne consume kar liya tha raja ka virya jisse do judwa baccche hue the. Jakar poori story dekh.
@@silent_rider_12 tere baton se pata chal ta he tu he to gawar aur upar se andhbhakt ,pehli baat jalpari to he nahi wo bhi kalpanik hai , aj tak koi nahi dekha dusri baat jalpari consumer kar liya matlab kya muh se nigal ne se bacha peda ho jata he kya , sale tum andhbhakt aur kuch pakhand baba ke wajah se aj santan ka mazak ban ta he .
Krishna is beyond winning and losing, the whole war was Krishna leela
😂 bhai blindly follow na karo har cheez ko
can you make a video about if karna was in pandavas side shree krisna challenegd shakuni for game f dice all that make what if series for mahbharat and ramayan
Lovely
Also i would like to share that my Family is also one of the descendants of Pandavs we come from the Tomar Rajvansh of Gwalior but we live in Rajasthan.
It is about "dekhane ka najariya" it's all about right and wrong...you can't compare lord Krishna with Shakuni. Shakuni apnea behen ki andh Dritrashta ke saath hui shaadi ke Bradley ke bhaav se samasta hastinapur ke kul ka Nash karne ke hetu se ladhaai ladi thi woh na kauravo ke saath tha na paandav ke saath tha, but lord krishna fought against adharma not against mankind.
I love listening to podcast while cooking and one fine day i found a podcast on mahabarata i got so dwelled into it. Originally mahabarata was written from a male perspective. Surprisingly i found this book the palace of illusion by chitra banarjee which tells the story of mahabarata from draupati’s perspective. Before reading and listening to podcast i know the basics of it. Mahabarata is caused due to draupati. But i kept questioning agar usney yeah nehi kiya hota to mahabarat ho kya, is it really draupati which lead the great battle about righteousness. At some point i blame beeshma.
Aaj kuch Naya mila sikhne ko ❤
Love it 😊
ভাই, আপনি যুক্তি-তর্কের সহিত একদম ঠিকই বলেছেন, এই video তে বর্ণিত বিষয় গুলি আমি অন্য source থেকেও জেনেছি, মহাভারতের প্রতি পদক্ষেপেই অবৈধ সংগমের কথা জানা যায়, যাহা সাধারণ পাঠ্য মহাভারতে পাওয়া যায় না
Lakshya’s lakshya is to sell his book, Mahabharata was just a pretext. No mentions of which Mahabharata editions he went through. And best of all, only a one-line mention in the passing of the descendants of Arjun.
Deplorable motive, regurgitative stories.
Maine bhi Mahabharat par kafi research ki thi or jab mujhe ye stories pata chali to mai bhi kafi hairan ho gya tha 😅
Aaj wahi stories yha dikh rhi h 🙌🏻
The fact is there is no real proof of any of this but SPECULATION.
Rani Lakshmi bai lost her war... history don't see her as bad person...
History sees her as a hero...
Just because some one losses a fight don't mean that they are on the side of adharma...
History remembers by karma of dharma... not other wise
Hamara indian culture kitna khubsurat hai❤
In every video. They try to spread misinformation.
bhai views ke liye kuch bhi karenge yeh
बहुत बढ़िया अच्छा ज्ञान है और आगे भी बताइए🎉🎉🎉
The knowledge was incredibly ❤
Being A somvanshi kstariya from Pratapgarh Uttar pradesh, I know about these stories ❤
4:14 -- Koi sense hai is baat ki !
literally i thought the same,i thought he sent his sperms to his wife
Actually my ancestors are also from Pratapgarh UP & we have direct blood relation with Arjun.😊 We are also Som vanshi Rajput. Our gautra was Baiaghrapad same as Bhishma Pitamah😊
3:49 kaisa tharki Raja tha😂😂
And what about King Shantanu? As far as I know, they were Shantanu and Satyavati's children. And King Shantanu and Ma Ganga's child was Bhisma.
Mate 😂😂 if you really want to meet the real descents of pandavs and kuroves, then visit Uttarakhand.
We have plenty of them.
We have their temples to, even for kuroves and they them self's live with us and help us in many ways.
You are right,Soamwanshi are descendants of Pandavs(also called Sumal rajputs) and there were 64 villages of soams near Meerut in UP.
3:58 pyar nahi tharak kehte hai ussey
😂😂😂😂
Bro didn't even hesitate 😂
May Lord Krishna also bless all who don't believe and naive
Har jagah bss Jaipur ki royal family, unki hi photo lagate jao, shree ram ke vanshaj bhi wahi, pandavo ke vanshaj bhi wahi aur koi hoge to unke bhi vanshaj bana lo unko. Hadd hai
Let me tell you another thing, Satyavati was not some random King's Daughter. She was Rishi Parashar's Daughter, about whom he wasn't aware.
Call it whatever you will, Parashar was Satyavati's father and the father of Ved Vyas too. The Veerya story is true, only it was Rishi Parashar's , and not a king's.
At 1:33 sec see their ulta pro max pro ai pic
4:19 and this is why such stories are hard to process
It's not matshya Kanya, it's "matsya-gandha"
Jiske saath svayam Shri krishn ho wo toh avashya hi jeetenge or wo kabhi bhi adhram ka saath de hi nii sakte hai.
It's your perception of seeing things which I respect but Krishn will never be on the wrong side. 🚩🕉️
Esa kya hua ki jo parivaar hai unki shaktiya jagrit hui 2020 me aur kesi shaktiya ???🤨🤨
He said it is fiction
A lot of hindu fanatics can't stand the fact that if pandavs lost the war then krishna would suffer shakuni's fate but that is how it should be looked at objectively.... look at any wars and you'd know that history is written by the victors
Its a great information.
Muje mata sataya vati ki story nhi pata thi wow yrrr maaz aya video ma keep it up ap log raaz wala asa hi video banaya kro ❤❤❤❤😮
Im giving you forewarning to remove this line 00:57
"if kaurav win the the whole scenario will be different ITs about the worng and write and you can not compare shree krishna with shakuni
Learn to take other peoples perceptions from a different mindset. Nothing wrong in thinking in an alter way. Understand what he is trying to express.
The saint got next level of flirting skills..
Well king Parikshit was about to the Kaliyuga and the time.
I dont agree with your opening statement. You said history was written bcoz pandav won. But history was written by maharishi ved vyas ji, who was neutral to both sides and he was grandfather of both kauravas and pandavas.
Reporting for misinformation.
I liked this episode ❤...good job 👍🏻
Dumb arguments made in this episode. Disappointed!
Can u please elaborate?
Absolutely.
How disturbing thoughts like Shakuni Krishna ban jata 😂..bhai ne kuch alag krne ke chakkar me Mahabharat ka saar hi bdl dala..
No body can or will be like Krishna.
@@RahulKumar-xe9ceif I'm wrong plasee correct me krishna was just coach master in this epic tournament supporting his fellows in time to time what these people thought that he was a just a coach but didn't know that the coach itself is the god
@@RahulKumar-xe9cebhai vo sahi bol rahe hai Mahabharat me koi Krishna jitna soch skta tha toh vo sakuni hi tha
@@RahulKumar-xe9cetumhe pura gyan nhi hai abhi
Bhai sahab
Bhimasen too had descendants through Jalandhara (Valandhara) and Hidimbaa
Yudhishthir had a daughter through Draupadi who married one of the sons of Lord Krishna
Other brothers also had descendants
The point is that Parikshit's progeny were not just only descendants
Click bait 😑
There's no comparison Shakuni was evil, with evil deeds and intentions. Sri Krishna Bhagwan is the Lord himself he is not good or nor evil. He decended on earth to teach us about right and wrong. Dharma or adharam and karma yog. He gifted us Sri mad Bhagvat Gita.
Ye galat information spread kar raha hai. Ye toh swayam Krishna ko doshi thahara raha hai, question kar raha hai. Wah re manushya! 😮😮😮
Are bhai, wo to galat bol hi rha hai. Pehle yeh batao, kya koi machli manushya ko paida kar sakti hai? 😅 Aur ye bhaisab, Arjun k vanshajo se milkar aye hai.
If Pandavas were defeated, then Krishna himself would have ended the war. There were many attempts from Krishna's side, and others to stop the war from happening; however, Dhuriyodana was persistent, and this left Kirshna with no choice.
I know most people are delusional..... But yaar इतना भी मत feko 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lord Krsna wants to give a message for the kaliyug that why he did his leela and in that Mahabharat is included ...that was the 1st cause
what if series for mahabharat
THANKS A LOT
What logic is this if satyawati being born is the first domino then why can't shantanu being born be the first domino? Even after draupadi vastraharan and vanvas when pandavas returned they had peacefully asked for their kingdom back. If someone could have convinced duryodhan to give it back then , then also mahabharat could have been avoided. you can't give an initial domino in this case as any prior point can be called an initial domino. If king hastin hadnt created hastinapur then there wouldn't have been an hastinapur and therefore no mahabharat. there can be a definite last nail in the coffin which was the rejection of peace offer brought by Krishna
Matlab us raja ne wan me muthh mari....😂😂