- quality decision, good over bad ones, - ethics: branch of philo that asks the practical “What should we do?” Which leads to the study of value, principles, beliefs, norms. These SHAPE our choices Answering the necessary questions to get clear on WHAT MATTERS: Our values and principles Values - things we hold to be good and care about most deeply (ex. Justice Knowledge Family Equality) In some cases, you may value two attributes from opposing sides, which pull you in different directions
I can help Lee without breaking his trust. Like telling our other friends to be patient, to be compassionate and delve deeper why he did those actions. And if they won't listen, then maybe Lee is not in the correct inner circle because true friends will accept who you are and will try to understand you. p.s. if you are experiencing depression, anxiety, YOU ARE WORTH IT, YOU ARE VALUABLE EVEN MORE THAN THOSE PRECIOUS GEMS. You have a place in this world and it will never be the same without you. What you feel is valid and you, we, deserve all the good things in life.
Or why couldn't you also go back to Lee and say that people aren't psychic and misinterpret Lee's flakiness for not caring about his friendships when it isn't them at all; and that if you share these issues with friends they are likely to be more understanding and empathetic and if not then Lee can't be in those circles.
It could be that it is an act sublimation. Lee has made a conscious decision to share the problem of his depression with another person, which is a sign of a cry for help, and if explaining the basics of the issue to friends and alerting them to be sensitive with him helps, then it is potentially for the ultimate good of Lee. Andreas Lubitz, the Pilot of the German Wings plane, which he deliberately crashed into a mountain, had a mental health problem that his doctor kept confidential and did not inform the airline: result, 144 dead passengers and crew. If they could speak from the grave I wonder what their opinion on the subject of confidentiality would be.
Why not go back to Lee and explain what the other friend had said and encourage Lee to reach out or talk about the possibility of you speaking on lees behalf of the topic arises again. This dilemma occurs mainly because you feel you can’t go back and explain the situation to Lee? In saying that, the comment above saying about “mentioning how lee might be going through something and to ease off” is a good way of preserving both also.
I agree. There was more than the 2 choices presented. There was also the option that, while not solving the dilemma, made the correct decision easier to identify (assuming there actually was a decision that needed to be made by you). The clear next step was simply to talk to Lee about your dilemma, and listen to what Lee had to say. Maybe Lee could have given you the answer in relation to which choice was the better one in terms of both values and principles. The key is that every person has their own values and principles. So, why not just ask Lee, to find out this person's values and principles? They matter too. In fact, in this case, Lee's position on the question is more relevant than yours because it is about Lee and Lee's welfare. It's still not the answer to the dilemma, but a necessary step to take before acting only on your own values and principles, in my opinion. You need to collect all relevant information before you can every begin to make a "right" choice.
@@CatMcMAC agreed, ask Lee if he believes that by opening up will it help solve his dilemma. Discuss with him as he has opened up tp you, meaning trust is there. If not then we not only break his trust, but it may force him to further isolate himself. In the end, making a decision, an ethical one, involves others. If not everyone would do their own thing. Only when Lee is contemplating self-harm then we would step in as at that point
@@wrathfirex Thanks for your reply! :) I think what's missing from many discussions about ethics and ethical choices people must make is the importance of the very first step. Before making a decision, gather all the information that is or may be relevant. This step must be taken before a choice is made, or even can be made, if framed in the context of any of all of an individual's core values. I'm not sure whether this step was just assumed would had been done in the hypothetical situation put to us. Even it it was, I think this should have been added to the hypothetical. Why? Because if real life, in the real world, major decisions which impact millions of human lives are being made by people who have not availed themselves of all of the relevant information. Either they haven't researched and taken advice on both the things that influence their decisions and the consequences of their decisions, or they are aware but their decisions are based on an ideological concept. In these cases, the decisions are simply not ethical decisions. In our own lives, it's likely that the decisions made by you, I, and every Lee in our communities don't directly impact millions of lives. The point is the same. Information gathering in order to make even a rudimentary ethical cost/benefit analysis, is crucial. The reality is different though. We make most daily decisions automatically because most choices are small inconsequential matters in our day to day lives. As we make so many choices every day, our brains are in the habit of making quick choices. Habits are ingrained behaviour patterns. Put simply, more of us should stop before we make a decision that will impact another person and get the all of the facts available to us first. Easier said than done! :) Any thoughts, Azlin?
Mention to your mutual friend that maybe Lee is going through something and needs some space at the moment. Trust remains,friend backs off,problem solved. We all do at times.
The only thing is depending on the friend, they may still view that as a breach of confidentiality and respond in anger as them going through something makes them vulnerable and they are scared of being percieved as weak by others. It's a hard situation. I thought what if you asked lee if you could tell them they are going through something, but they may then view your frustrated friend as being aggressive and then respond to them in a negative way therefore creating conflict.
Jade Noble-Day also a good point. The conflict however is not of your doing. It is unfair of Lee, after you have stayed true to your promise to then pick a side or sit be involved in the conflict. Some issues have multiple paths of resolution, while some seem to narrow down towards a conflict that needs to be resolved or that will resolve a situation. I don’t believe in heading straight toward conflict as an option but if all paths have been closed then it is a healthy way to get a situation sorted out?
The purpose of friendship - if one can state such simply - is surely more than to 'share someone's life with them - highs and lows'... It is also to look out for them; support them through crises; defend them within social groups. Hence talking to Lee again and explaining how others might view what Lee does is a good act for a friend. Breaking confidence by saying anything about Lee to the criticising friend is generally the wrong move. The Samaritans (help-liine in UK/Ireland) have good guidelines on confidentiality. For example, if you form the view that Lee is incapable of making a decision then your obligation to protect them overrides your commitment to confidentiality.
For me ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that "involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior".
Yes, think about values and purpose, and realize how these concepts represent your own personal bias drawn from the personal biases of other people that you may think know better than you do. Think about how safe and superior it makes you feel to "know" you have done the right thing. Now look deeper.
Personal opinion is talk to Lee about the situation with the other friend and urge Lee to maybe address the circle of friends with what is going on. At that point you've both kept your trust with him but also been a good friend and attempted to remedy the situation.
Great video! I like the ending and how it ties into the rest of the information. Great job! We all need to take a little more time to consider the impact we can make-
Helen, Lee really appreciated being asked out. I personally love invitations even if I can't come. It's so kind of you to think of her, and it takes no effort for us on group chat. There may be a good reason why Lee can't come atm. So instead, let's try not to be so disappointed when she doesn't come along. Lee, would you like people to continue inviting you to things? I think it is in your best interests to go sometimes, even if you don't feel like it. It may surprise you how much people care about you and how much having you around is lovely, even if you are just chilling in the corner. How did I do?
If you believe in group PILE-ONS, just because something goes against your personal belief has nothing to do with what's right around for you, then you're just another bully
This strikes a fine balance of acting in the interests of a person, but preserving their right to make their own decisions, and deserving their confidence. It's about the best response to the question I've seen in this comments section.
That person who complained is not a real friend and Lee would probably be much better off without him/her. Also, be careful not to make hasty judgments/ draw conclusions too soon. What if Lee’s depression is self- diagnosed and he/she feels like he/she does because he/she works two unfulfilling jobs to care for his/her two kids, sleeps poorly, and the complaining friend had said or done to him/her something that contributed to him/ her feeling like that? My point is- do not assume anything. And keep your mouth shut- at least until you understand what is going on.
Here's a recap of what the video said. Nobody has a clue what ethics is. Nobody knows what is right or wrong, it's just up to you to decide what is right and wrong for you. Just like Socrates, the only thing I know is that I know nothing, because all of these guidelines are different from people to people, these "guidelines" maybe identical, maybe overlapping, but they're independent from one another.
The overlap is the issue. Ethics are not infinitely flexible, within one ethical system or across ethical systems. There are emergent patterns and that is what ethics concerns itself with: the nature and uses of those patterns.
@@argybarg Overlapping patterns doesn't mean it being special. The majority of something is just the majority of something. The majority of the people on this Earth are simpletons, doesn't mean it's a special thing.
@@khoile9807 With all due respect, what you are expressing is a very rudimentary skepticism of the kind that philosophy students usually get past within the first six weeks of their first classes. No matter how much ethics vary across cultures, there are emergent patterns and continuities just as there are with grammar and language, and just as there are with living forms under evolution. “No one agrees, therefore there is no meaning” - it’s a little too basic and you should grant yourself the nerve to go further.
@@argybarg No, pal. This is an observation of a scientist who can "see" the total nonsense within the definition that you and countless others foolishly delude yourself into believing. What is this "meaning"? Who decides it? You find it common therefore it is a meaning? Variants exists, does that meaning just abandon them and throw them to hell? People who were raised to be criminals, people who raised to become terrorist, and that's what they have become, where this " absolute meaning" to these people. Hey dummy, the world is made of matter, how a human aka a bunch of matters arranged in a certain way reacts to the natural world is just interaction between matters.There's nothing special about it. We're an insignificant life form within an insignificant star system within an insignificant galaxy within an infinite universe. Don't confuse common pattern of neurological system with a "special and superior" neurological system. This is not philosophy, this is not "belief", this is observation. What is your conclusion based on? Make belief?
I should add that if a student in your class contracts covid and gets sick he or she has the right to sue you and your university (since they have the deep pockets). As a teacher you have an obligation to keep your students safe. Perhaps this is the point where your freedom of action and conscience collides with the rights of your students and your higher obligation is to them, Perhaps your best solution is to take a leave of absence or a sabbatical and write that book you've been meaning to write.
you have no idea whether her getting a vaccine will protect her students or give them covid from taking the shot and the shot does not give any promises that they will not get covid so your argument is irrelevant.
Good and bad, right and wrong are subjective terms. You have to decide for yourself which is what. People can't even agree that life is worth living. For many, it's worth losing.
Good and bad, right and wrong are subjective to a point. This is technically true, but pragmatically it would be counter intuitive and just cause more problems with this line of thinking. The last two sentences seems like depression. I'm not mocking you for this because I have depression too. Depression effects something called thought patterns, or put simply, the way your brain is thinking over a period of time and how it makes you act. You are espousing nihilism here, which is technically true, there is no inherent meaning in the universe, but practically speaking if everyone thought this way we would be tearing ourselves apart. I would respond and say look into some existentialist philosophy. I'm not a psychologist or anything, but I've had that same line of reasoning and it really messes with how you live.
Using Kant's formulations, discern the correct answer to this scenario: -Person A and Person B have been best friends for 6 years. -Person A has been dating Person C for 3 years. -Person A and Person C stop dating - 1 year later Person C and Person B start dating. Person A is upset about this. -Person A and Person B argue over whether or not Person B is allowed to date Person C because Person C is th Person A's ex. Question: What is the problem in this situation?
Values, beliefs, principles, norms. Ethical dilemmas are conflicts between values. The choice as too which Value to choose is ambiguous. It is dependent on which value you value the most in each individual situation and context. 🤔
Very, very good presentation. One point of confusion--In the beginning we see that values, principles, beliefs and norms comprise ethics. But by the end, we've applied values and principles, and when in need of more, then we rely on purpose. That seems right, but couldn't beliefs and norms reasonably be set aside as hopelessly transient or contingent, I'd suggest, for use in ethical dilemmas?
Ok might be a wierd suggestion but do shorts , i know keeping this quality into a short could be difficult but it would be great content and very informative i reckon it's a niche u guys should attempt
The primary reason we have Ethics is for establishing Social Norms and rules so we can live together. If we got rid of them then people would always do what is better for them and not others. Wonder why we are treating the Earth so bad then? We would rather drive our cars than save the Earth.
00:08 Ethics influences our daily decisions. 00:42 Ethics is about defining good choices and viable options. 01:19 Ethics requires empathy and responsible sharing of information 02:29 Ethics involves trustworthiness and compassion 03:00 Ethics is about adapting and applying values and principles in decision making 03:36 Ethical principles are crucial in guiding behavior. 04:15 Making choices that impact the world
There is another way of dealing with that third friend, you could say "I think Lee is going through a tough time at the moment, please have patience and try again"
What if Lee's other friend also expressed their concern in confidence? There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to ethics or contemporary moral issues. Just a lot of opinions.
I would like to mention that life isn't always black and white. You can honour your word and still do what is other's best interest. You could not tell anyone about Lee's depression, but you could share that Lee has a lot on his plate at the moment. Ethics usually forget there is a grey area.
My answer to the thing about the depressed friend: it's unfortunate to make promises you can't keep. There is always a solution that doesn't need to depend on dishonesty.
Inopiquez, Reah Mae E BSCRIM 2 CAA20 1.Why are there rules? What do you think would happen to society if there were no rules? ----There are rules in order to maintain organize, peace, secured, and equal. That would help avoid chaos and misunderstanding. If there's no rules, we don't have also the foundation for a functional and successful society. In other words, we must have rules to guide our actions and facilitate the smooth working of society. 2. Personally, why do you think you should study ethics? ---- Personally I should study ethics since it helps me to know who really I am, right hat things I really need and even deepens my reflection on the Ultimate questions of life and brings me in viewing my life critically and taught me to evaluate my actions and thoughts.
See what decision suits better the situation and consider it. But, before acting, show and explain to lee the reason you will act this way so he can know beforehand. Dialoguing this way you'll be faithful to him anyway. And if you think you should tell someone, at least he would know your motivation (to help him).
I've recently self-published a novel that might be of interest to people who are fascinated by ethical dilemmas :) It's called The Decision by Nathan McGregor. It's available in Kindle and paperback format.
Whoa that question was Good because both of actions have 1 Good and 1bad outcome independant to eachother and its really looks like %50 %50 of decision making
Thank You for Sharing this Video. Im Glad Im here. Nice one enjoy lang po❤️ Hoping to watch more videos from you ☺️ Have a Great Day. Greetings from our Family Kapiso Mo Vlog.. Stay safe and Godbless You Always😇❤️ 4:55
what makes this a matter of ethics? what is you own ethical judgement on this case? what is you reason for the judgement? pahelp Po sa assignment ko.thank you
You gotta hit the mutual friend with a sneaky lie like "bro fuck I don't know but I saw homie just sitting on a bench looking soooooooo fucked up in his sad bag idk man you should maybe check up on him see whats good, might be goin' thru it but Im not sure so I'd ask him If i were you." so the mutual friend is at least aware of the situation. After that you go talk to Lee and be like "yo homie thinks you're flaking on him OD and shit I think you should tell him whats good if he tries to ask you" and then boom everyones on board.
@euthyphrodungeonsdragons8064 Christian Ethics class? How is this even possible when the bible itself advocates slavery, genocide, violence, misogyny and incest?
Perceiving this, as well as the fact that there were no more of the awful "bangs" to come from the revolvers, the Gargoyles advanced in a swarm as thick as bees, so that the air was filled with them.
pov: Autistic adult who did terribly in school (and gave up) but later found themselves drawn to understanding ethics, morals and seeing if they could use what knowledge exists out there in the universe to see if stuff makes sense.
- quality decision, good over bad ones,
- ethics: branch of philo that asks the practical “What should we do?”
Which leads to the study of value, principles, beliefs, norms. These SHAPE our choices
Answering the necessary questions to get clear on WHAT MATTERS: Our values and principles
Values - things we hold to be good and care about most deeply (ex. Justice Knowledge Family Equality)
In some cases, you may value two attributes from opposing sides, which pull you in different directions
Thanks for summarizing the video ✨✨
pov: your watching this for school
nel perro
You are or you’re. Your is as different from you’re as ethics are to morals. Not the same meaning at all.
yep
Nah
We're writing a reflection paper about whether we need ethics or not.
I can help Lee without breaking his trust. Like telling our other friends to be patient, to be compassionate and delve deeper why he did those actions. And if they won't listen, then maybe Lee is not in the correct inner circle because true friends will accept who you are and will try to understand you.
p.s. if you are experiencing depression, anxiety, YOU ARE WORTH IT, YOU ARE VALUABLE EVEN MORE THAN THOSE PRECIOUS GEMS. You have a place in this world and it will never be the same without you. What you feel is valid and you, we, deserve all the good things in life.
Or why couldn't you also go back to Lee and say that people aren't psychic and misinterpret Lee's flakiness for not caring about his friendships when it isn't them at all; and that if you share these issues with friends they are likely to be more understanding and empathetic and if not then Lee can't be in those circles.
when you got to watch for school
Yep
BBBBAGPLAYS what was your answer to what type of values
@@shylawattley1390 i think, ethics
It could be that it is an act sublimation. Lee has made a conscious decision to share the problem of his depression with another person, which is a sign of a cry for help, and if explaining the basics of the issue to friends and alerting them to be sensitive with him helps, then it is potentially for the ultimate good of Lee. Andreas Lubitz, the Pilot of the German Wings plane, which he deliberately crashed into a mountain, had a mental health problem that his doctor kept confidential and did not inform the airline: result, 144 dead passengers and crew.
If they could speak from the grave I wonder what their opinion on the subject of confidentiality would be.
It was totally illegal for the doctor to keep that secret, for obvious reasons. He should have lost his license to practice and faced lawsuits.
Why not go back to Lee and explain what the other friend had said and encourage Lee to reach out or talk about the possibility of you speaking on lees behalf of the topic arises again. This dilemma occurs mainly because you feel you can’t go back and explain the situation to Lee? In saying that, the comment above saying about “mentioning how lee might be going through something and to ease off” is a good way of preserving both also.
I agree. There was more than the 2 choices presented. There was also the option that, while not solving the dilemma, made the correct decision easier to identify (assuming there actually was a decision that needed to be made by you).
The clear next step was simply to talk to Lee about your dilemma, and listen to what Lee had to say. Maybe Lee could have given you the answer in relation to which choice was the better one in terms of both values and principles.
The key is that every person has their own values and principles. So, why not just ask Lee, to find out this person's values and principles? They matter too. In fact, in this case, Lee's position on the question is more relevant than yours because it is about Lee and Lee's welfare.
It's still not the answer to the dilemma, but a necessary step to take before acting only on your own values and principles, in my opinion. You need to collect all relevant information before you can every begin to make a "right" choice.
point
@@CatMcMAC agreed, ask Lee if he believes that by opening up will it help solve his dilemma. Discuss with him as he has opened up tp you, meaning trust is there. If not then we not only break his trust, but it may force him to further isolate himself. In the end, making a decision, an ethical one, involves others. If not everyone would do their own thing. Only when Lee is contemplating self-harm then we would step in as at that point
@@wrathfirex Thanks for your reply! :)
I think what's missing from many discussions about ethics and ethical choices people must make is the importance of the very first step. Before making a decision, gather all the information that is or may be relevant. This step must be taken before a choice is made, or even can be made, if framed in the context of any of all of an individual's core values.
I'm not sure whether this step was just assumed would had been done in the hypothetical situation put to us. Even it it was, I think this should have been added to the hypothetical. Why? Because if real life, in the real world, major decisions which impact millions of human lives are being made by people who have not availed themselves of all of the relevant information. Either they haven't researched and taken advice on both the things that influence their decisions and the consequences of their decisions, or they are aware but their decisions are based on an ideological concept. In these cases, the decisions are simply not ethical decisions.
In our own lives, it's likely that the decisions made by you, I, and every Lee in our communities don't directly impact millions of lives. The point is the same. Information gathering in order to make even a rudimentary ethical cost/benefit analysis, is crucial. The reality is different though. We make most daily decisions automatically because most choices are small inconsequential matters in our day to day lives.
As we make so many choices every day, our brains are in the habit of making quick choices. Habits are ingrained behaviour patterns. Put simply, more of us should stop before we make a decision that will impact another person and get the all of the facts available to us first. Easier said than done! :)
Any thoughts, Azlin?
Who is here because of online class?
Me 🤦🏼😂
Me 😂😂
I am, but why do you ask? I'm interested to know this.
Me lol
meee 🥱
Getting my students to watch this! A real conversation starter, great editing on the video.
I always love cheerful teachers in youtube comment sections
Mention to your mutual friend that maybe Lee is going through something and needs some space at the moment. Trust remains,friend backs off,problem solved. We all do at times.
The only thing is depending on the friend, they may still view that as a breach of confidentiality and respond in anger as them going through something makes them vulnerable and they are scared of being percieved as weak by others. It's a hard situation. I thought what if you asked lee if you could tell them they are going through something, but they may then view your frustrated friend as being aggressive and then respond to them in a negative way therefore creating conflict.
Jade Noble-Day also a good point. The conflict however is not of your doing. It is unfair of Lee, after you have stayed true to your promise to then pick a side or sit be involved in the conflict. Some issues have multiple paths of resolution, while some seem to narrow down towards a conflict that needs to be resolved or that will resolve a situation. I don’t believe in heading straight toward conflict as an option but if all paths have been closed then it is a healthy way to get a situation sorted out?
Maybe he’s a liberal and liberals are always unhappy and depressed
The purpose of friendship - if one can state such simply - is surely more than to 'share someone's life with them - highs and lows'... It is also to look out for them; support them through crises; defend them within social groups. Hence talking to Lee again and explaining how others might view what Lee does is a good act for a friend. Breaking confidence by saying anything about Lee to the criticising friend is generally the wrong move. The Samaritans (help-liine in UK/Ireland) have good guidelines on confidentiality. For example, if you form the view that Lee is incapable of making a decision then your obligation to protect them overrides your commitment to confidentiality.
yes, that resolution at the end was too simplistic.
I'm here because of The Good Place.
LMAOOO ME TOOO
Lmao same
Same 💀
No school
HAHAHAH SAME
I am becoming like Chidi. I am absolutely paralyzed by decision making, and it is destroying my life!
For me ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that "involves systematizing, defending and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior".
ruclips.net/video/GTy8xBFM4PI/видео.html
Try this ethics video
❤
Yes, think about values and purpose, and realize how these concepts represent your own personal bias drawn from the personal biases of other people that you may think know better than you do. Think about how safe and superior it makes you feel to "know" you have done the right thing. Now look deeper.
Personal opinion is talk to Lee about the situation with the other friend and urge Lee to maybe address the circle of friends with what is going on. At that point you've both kept your trust with him but also been a good friend and attempted to remedy the situation.
Great video! I like the ending and how it ties into the rest of the information. Great job! We all need to take a little more time to consider the impact we can make-
your comment is really good
Helen, Lee really appreciated being asked out. I personally love invitations even if I can't come. It's so kind of you to think of her, and it takes no effort for us on group chat. There may be a good reason why Lee can't come atm. So instead, let's try not to be so disappointed when she doesn't come along.
Lee, would you like people to continue inviting you to things? I think it is in your best interests to go sometimes, even if you don't feel like it. It may surprise you how much people care about you and how much having you around is lovely, even if you are just chilling in the corner.
How did I do?
ruclips.net/video/YvmAXl9xlWA/видео.html
If you believe in group PILE-ONS, just because something goes against your personal belief has nothing to do with what's right around for you, then you're just another bully
This strikes a fine balance of acting in the interests of a person, but preserving their right to make their own decisions, and deserving their confidence. It's about the best response to the question I've seen in this comments section.
That person who complained is not a real friend and Lee would probably be much better off without him/her.
Also, be careful not to make hasty judgments/ draw conclusions too soon. What if Lee’s depression is self- diagnosed and he/she feels like he/she does because he/she works two unfulfilling jobs to care for his/her two kids, sleeps poorly, and the complaining friend had said or done to him/her something that contributed to him/ her feeling like that?
My point is- do not assume anything. And keep your mouth shut- at least until you understand what is going on.
Here's a recap of what the video said. Nobody has a clue what ethics is. Nobody knows what is right or wrong, it's just up to you to decide what is right and wrong for you.
Just like Socrates, the only thing I know is that I know nothing, because all of these guidelines are different from people to people, these "guidelines" maybe identical, maybe overlapping, but they're independent from one another.
The overlap is the issue. Ethics are not infinitely flexible, within one ethical system or across ethical systems. There are emergent patterns and that is what ethics concerns itself with: the nature and uses of those patterns.
@@argybarg Overlapping patterns doesn't mean it being special.
The majority of something is just the majority of something. The majority of the people on this Earth are simpletons, doesn't mean it's a special thing.
@@khoile9807 With all due respect, what you are expressing is a very rudimentary skepticism of the kind that philosophy students usually get past within the first six weeks of their first classes. No matter how much ethics vary across cultures, there are emergent patterns and continuities just as there are with grammar and language, and just as there are with living forms under evolution. “No one agrees, therefore there is no meaning” - it’s a little too basic and you should grant yourself the nerve to go further.
Also, in no way is what you initially stated “a recap of what the video said.”
@@argybarg No, pal. This is an observation of a scientist who can "see" the total nonsense within the definition that you and countless others foolishly delude yourself into believing.
What is this "meaning"? Who decides it? You find it common therefore it is a meaning? Variants exists, does that meaning just abandon them and throw them to hell?
People who were raised to be criminals, people who raised to become terrorist, and that's what they have become, where this " absolute meaning" to these people.
Hey dummy, the world is made of matter, how a human aka a bunch of matters arranged in a certain way reacts to the natural world is just interaction between matters.There's nothing special about it.
We're an insignificant life form within an insignificant star system within an insignificant galaxy within an infinite universe.
Don't confuse common pattern of neurological system with a "special and superior" neurological system.
This is not philosophy, this is not "belief", this is observation.
What is your conclusion based on? Make belief?
a code of conduct, a moral compass, an ability to know right from wrong, good from bad.
You are watching it for school, and your kid yells beside: "This is Matt from Short and Curly?!"
I should add that if a student in your class contracts covid and gets sick he or she has the right to sue you and your university (since they have the deep pockets). As a teacher you have an obligation to keep your students safe. Perhaps this is the point where your freedom of action and conscience collides with the rights of your students and your higher obligation is to them, Perhaps your best solution is to take a leave of absence or a sabbatical and write that book you've been meaning to write.
you have no idea whether her getting a vaccine will protect her students or give them covid from taking the shot and the shot does not give any promises that they will not get covid so your argument is irrelevant.
Good and bad, right and wrong are subjective terms. You have to decide for yourself which is what. People can't even agree that life is worth living. For many, it's worth losing.
Good and bad, right and wrong are subjective to a point. This is technically true, but pragmatically it would be counter intuitive and just cause more problems with this line of thinking. The last two sentences seems like depression. I'm not mocking you for this because I have depression too. Depression effects something called thought patterns, or put simply, the way your brain is thinking over a period of time and how it makes you act. You are espousing nihilism here, which is technically true, there is no inherent meaning in the universe, but practically speaking if everyone thought this way we would be tearing ourselves apart. I would respond and say look into some existentialist philosophy. I'm not a psychologist or anything, but I've had that same line of reasoning and it really messes with how you live.
who else is watching this or school
Ryannnnnnn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Using Kant's formulations, discern the correct answer to this scenario:
-Person A and Person B have been best friends for 6 years.
-Person A has been dating Person C for 3 years.
-Person A and Person C stop dating
- 1 year later Person C and Person B start dating. Person A is upset about this.
-Person A and Person B argue over whether or not Person B is allowed to date Person C because Person C is th Person A's ex.
Question: What is the problem in this situation?
The decision belongs uniquely to Person C.
Values, beliefs, principles, norms. Ethical dilemmas are conflicts between values. The choice as too which
Value to choose is ambiguous. It is dependent on which value you value the most in each individual situation and context. 🤔
Very, very good presentation.
One point of confusion--In the beginning we see that values, principles, beliefs and norms comprise ethics. But by the end, we've applied values and principles, and when in need of more, then we rely on purpose. That seems right, but couldn't beliefs and norms reasonably be set aside as hopelessly transient or contingent, I'd suggest, for use in ethical dilemmas?
Ok might be a wierd suggestion but do shorts , i know keeping this quality into a short could be difficult but it would be great content and very informative i reckon it's a niche u guys should attempt
The primary reason we have Ethics is for establishing Social Norms and rules so we can live together. If we got rid of them then people would always do what is better for them and not others. Wonder why we are treating the Earth so bad then? We would rather drive our cars than save the Earth.
00:08 Ethics influences our daily decisions.
00:42 Ethics is about defining good choices and viable options.
01:19 Ethics requires empathy and responsible sharing of information
02:29 Ethics involves trustworthiness and compassion
03:00 Ethics is about adapting and applying values and principles in decision making
03:36 Ethical principles are crucial in guiding behavior.
04:15 Making choices that impact the world
There is another way of dealing with that third friend, you could say "I think Lee is going through a tough time at the moment, please have patience and try again"
I would talk to Lee about the issue the 3rd guy is having. maybe try to convince Lee to come out and seek help.
What if Lee's other friend also expressed their concern in confidence? There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to ethics or contemporary moral issues. Just a lot of opinions.
I would like to mention that life isn't always black and white. You can honour your word and still do what is other's best interest. You could not tell anyone about Lee's depression, but you could share that Lee has a lot on his plate at the moment. Ethics usually forget there is a grey area.
I'm here cause it is very valuable in our daily life once we dealing with professional work and even with small project.
Ethics is all we got
Quantity of decisions matters a lot because quality of the decision making is directly related to choice fatigue.
My answer to the thing about the depressed friend: it's unfortunate to make promises you can't keep. There is always a solution that doesn't need to depend on dishonesty.
Inopiquez, Reah Mae E BSCRIM 2 CAA20
1.Why are there rules? What do you think would happen to society if there were no rules?
----There are rules in order to maintain organize, peace, secured, and equal. That would help avoid chaos and misunderstanding. If there's no rules, we don't have also the foundation for a functional and successful society. In other words, we must have rules to guide our actions and facilitate the smooth working of society.
2. Personally, why do you think you should study ethics?
---- Personally I should study ethics since it helps me to know who really I am, right hat things I really need and even deepens my reflection on the Ultimate questions of life and brings me in viewing my life critically and taught me to evaluate my actions and thoughts.
just used this on my 6th grade students. We thought it was amazing,and the edit helped alot of them understand.
- THANKS MAN :)
See what decision suits better the situation and consider it. But, before acting, show and explain to lee the reason you will act this way so he can know beforehand. Dialoguing this way you'll be faithful to him anyway. And if you think you should tell someone, at least he would know your motivation (to help him).
Everyone needs this
Very interesting and informative..!😀🌟
Nice on, very informative
Watching this for school. Thankyou so helpful
Lee is unintentionally putting us "between a rock and a hard place".
Great video! This is so informative. Thank you.
I am very impressed with the editing work😀
Swear I am more confused now lol..
I've recently self-published a novel that might be of interest to people who are fascinated by ethical dilemmas :) It's called The Decision by Nathan McGregor. It's available in Kindle and paperback format.
I like the video. I will it in my class in ethics. Good job.
so what is ethics?
This is so informative. Thank you!
It will be nice if there is a group page for philosophy student around the world
you didn't answer what would you do on lee's situation what the hecc
That's the best part of ethics.....There is no 1 right answer.
Great video. Using this in class for my 1st year undergrads. Thank you very much for sharing
This is one well edited video.
nice uplifting video
Brilliant presentation on the subject.
Excellent video. the concept was indeed very clear looking forward to more with some more examples. Thankyou. Regards Mita.
" Orient of judgment " can someone explain it please
good explanation
This video looks good 🤩🌟
but how to diffrenciate modern ethics and traditional thinkers
Whoa that question was Good because both of actions have 1 Good and 1bad outcome independant to eachother and its really looks like %50 %50 of decision making
Recommended by Ravi Kapoor sir..
A word for subjective values.
Thank You for Sharing this Video. Im Glad Im here. Nice one enjoy lang po❤️ Hoping to watch more videos from you ☺️ Have a Great Day. Greetings from our Family Kapiso Mo Vlog.. Stay safe and Godbless You Always😇❤️ 4:55
Lee, you can come along any time you like even if you flake, i will still ask you again and again until you are ready 🎉❤
Thank you this great help me to get understand the about ethics
what makes this a matter of ethics?
what is you own ethical judgement on this case?
what is you reason for the judgement? pahelp Po sa assignment ko.thank you
Thank you
You gotta hit the mutual friend with a sneaky lie like "bro fuck I don't know but I saw homie just sitting on a bench looking soooooooo fucked up in his sad bag idk man you should maybe check up on him see whats good, might be goin' thru it but Im not sure so I'd ask him If i were you." so the mutual friend is at least aware of the situation. After that you go talk to Lee and be like "yo homie thinks you're flaking on him OD and shit I think you should tell him whats good if he tries to ask you" and then boom everyones on board.
We're here for Business. 🚂 #BoilerUp MT106
We need to clear it first with the individual, before we share sensitive information.
Really good video, thank you
Yeah video from my school teacher 🗿
Nice 👍👍🙂
The fact that I looked this up
I searched what is the most moral and ethical view of others.kind of like taking second look at the world in an objective
Way of life? Im right or wrong?
Watching here
So what course should I pursue if I love Ethics?
@euthyphrodungeonsdragons8064 Christian Ethics class? How is this even possible when the bible itself advocates slavery, genocide, violence, misogyny and incest?
Perceiving this, as well as the fact that there were no more of the awful "bangs" to come from the revolvers, the Gargoyles advanced in a swarm as thick as bees, so that the air was filled with them.
I love your accent. ❤️
Who said sorry at the final?
Iska transcript copy karke please send it here
Shout out sa teacher namin
Im here because this is my report
right is correct similar as 2+2=4.
awesome video
What is the difference between values, virtues, and principles?
would have talked to friend B about friend A mental health , in hoping he understand situation of friend A
This video has helped me to understand ethics, Thanks.
I agree
I agree
I agree
I agree
I agree
who gets do decide what is wrong and what's right?
Apparently, lawmakers. In my opinion, they are mostly wrong which means I'm wrong for doubting their perceived authority.
One word, WOW.
totally looks like rock lee in naruto
pov: Autistic adult who did terribly in school (and gave up) but later found themselves drawn to understanding ethics, morals and seeing if they could use what knowledge exists out there in the universe to see if stuff makes sense.
damn this is thing i have been trying to solve "who to believe how to act how to handle relationships .. thank you for the video
CCJE students na nanonood neto ! thumbs up di tayo babagsak
Great video!
What ARE ethics?