I refuse to buy things with logos on them. Why PAY to advertise for a company? Hey if they give the merch with a logo away, I’ll consider it!
2 года назад+7
Agree, and I always add: If they want me to be a living advertisement, they should pay me, instead of me paying for a garment with a logo. I don't like to be used as an advertisement, much less pay for it. I don't even like to walk around with the bag of a shop with the logo in it, I see it as free advertisement too.
Your laptop doesn't have a logo? Your phone? Your mouse? Your keyboard? Your monitor? Your athletic shoes?
2 года назад+3
@@MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou Of course, but in the case of my phone and keyboard, you don't see the logo at all, and about my sport shoes, I try to buy the ones that have a less visible logo, but in this case it's quite hard to buy sth that nobody recognizes, for the rest, I buy things without logos. Anyway, I'm not going around with my computer or my monitor! So, I'm not making an advertisement for it. And I own a camera too, I just put a black sticku tape on the logo and changed the strap (which also has the logo in it) for a neutral one... I also unstitch the labels on my clothes and any small label that could be somewhere on the outside part. I take this very seriously! :D
@ Fair enough. I tend to wear clothes I like, and so I don't mind if the companies that made them get credit for it-if anyone actually cares to notice (which no one does).
My sister taught me this decades ago not to buy something with a logo and here is her reason. Her reason is that company does not pay you to advertise for them so why should I.
Something that really amazed me when I first came to the US from Latin America was the fact that people were really interested in getting a free t-shirt even if it had the logo of a company in it, not a clothing brand - It’s like they were happy to advertise any company for free, as long as they’d get one more piece of clothing. One of my first jobs here was recruiting blood donors, and we would either give two free movie tickets or a t-shirt with the company logo printed in it, in exchange for a blood donation. The majority of people preferred the t-shirt and would wear it out in public, so I was very puzzled by that. “Maybe they don’t have enough clothes?” was my first thought, but they did. Then, I also started seeing people walking around with the red, Coca-Cola t-shirt or a Starbucks logo. Later, I switched jobs to another company and I got “company swag” as a holiday gift. Why is my holiday gift as an employee, the chance to advertise you for free with what I wear? And why are my coworkers so excited about the “swag”? By the way, my cousin (from my country) also wanted one of the free t-shirts from my old job, but she wanted it to sleep in it, never to wear it out in public! Marketing and advertising can also become part of a culture, if we let it.
@@MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou It’s disrespectful. Pay us more, or give us a holiday bonus, and I’ll be able to buy a pack of plain, black t-shirts or something I actually need. Back in the day in my home country, companies used to give out baskets with food, for holidays. Not anymore.
@@MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou It’s meant to be a holiday gift, but it comes with an advertisement intent more than the intent of adding value to the employee’s life.
It bothers me if the logo is looking, like it is the center of the item. If it is just a small logo on the sleeve or so, it does not really bother me, but i buy the things i need for their functionality and not because they are from manufacturer xy.
I am trying to ween myself of logos as part of my journey with minimalism. I have a few core brands which I wear, and have been loyal to for over 20 years (Carhartt WIP, Dickies, Vans, North Face) my issue is that these brands do tend to make incredibly durable and long lasting clothes, most of the time - and when I try to find unbranded. basic alternatives, the quality is not the same in a lot of other brands "basics". I live in London in the UK, so i have access to just about every option imaginable, but a lot of basics are just thin (low GSM fabrics) and not good quality construction. Eg, I have a handful of Carhartt branded hoodies which are over 5 years old and still as thick and cosy and in the same condition as when I purchased them. Likewise on their T-Shirts 240gsm tshirts that don't lose their shape or colour like cheaper JCREW or Uniqlo shirt. But as I get closer to 40, the idea of being a billboard for any brand is a bit weird to me, and overly branded clothes does tend to look slightly "young" which i guess is cool when you are 21, nor as much when you are 35+
I like the Dickies t-shirts because they last a long time and I don't mind the logo. The horseshoe logo actually gives the shirts character despite giving the company free advertising.
It’s a shame more unknown brands don’t make more attractive lines I only wear Nike trainers because I like the shape/profile of them not because they’re are Nike. Same for Levi’s only because of it fits well and they last, apart from that the top half of what I wear is always non logo clothes like from next or primark in the UK.
Tons of other great options besides Nike. You need to do a little more research and try other brands. I’m sure you can find good looking, good fitting clothes and shoes that are not made by the sweat shop, otherwise known as Nike.
@@FaithWolper Nike uses the same sweat shop labor as everybody else. They're just more known for it because they're more known. Unless you're buying clothes made in a developed country with high labor protection, you're not doing any better by simply avoiding Nike in favor of some less-popular brand with the same practices but less media scrutiny.
You can find high quality shirts out of organic cotton and sustainably produced from Organic Basics. No logos at all. 💙 Quality is amazing. Highly recommend!
@@PresbianTier Actually they have only one retail store in Copenhagen, Denmark. But maybe they work together with other stores. You could check on their website for a store finder and otherwise maybe use their size charts.
I'll wear clothing with a logo because anything I wear is fairly practical (Dickies, Carhartt, etc.), so if it helps other people find something practical for themselves, then it'll help them. I can't tell you the number of times I found something that I use regularly because the manufacturer's logo or info was on it. The only thing I wear now and again that has any "swag" value is a Blue Note T-shirt but I really dig Blue Note albums and nowadays, most people don't know what it is.
I saw this show about the rich kids of Dubai. One kid had a Louis Vuitton logod Bentley. It’s just bizarre. He could have bought whole houses for a homeless people with that cash.
I decided to buy an analogue watch To stop myself being distracted by my phone checking the time. I found a nice looking Diesel watch. The thing that surprised me was the amount of people who told me my watch is trying to be a Rolex.
I choose to just keep wearing what I have at this moment... I believe this isn't a manifesto to tell people just give up things in their closet now for the clothes without logo.
I currently wear one item of clothing with an obvious logo. I don't like obvious logos, but I wanted this particular article of clothing for the quality and comfort and lack of choice at the time I needed it. I say I wear them despite the logo.
I wear ALL black to work. Nothing else. I stick to basics. Nothing fancy. No logos. But still professional. Easier to get dressed in the morning. Casual days is a black tank from Walmart and jeans.
I stopped liking most shirts because I saved up for some clothes and went out and got some shirts. Well. Almost everytime I wore them someone else wore same. A few times even to the point of being in same area where me and two others all seen each other wearing same. It became clear then that it's all a stupid game.
Logos on clothing used to signify a seal of quality and people tried to buy the best they can afford. Clothing with Logos now (largely, there are a few exceptions) mean very little in terms of excellent quality (unless you are buying Couture) and are just pricer clothes with a picture or word on it. If it makes you happy and you can afford it, buy and wear what you like! The idea of an Auditorium full of "minimalists" gunning for a guy for wearing a logo HORRIFIES me! Xx
What about Batman? His logo is a symbol, something larger than himself, something enduring. Perhaps a logo can be good if, when people see it, they are inspired to do good. Like the Red Cross logo - oh I should donate blood. Not all brands are a symbol for status. Life is Good clothing is a symbol for optimism.
I just thought about this recently, I only wear blank hats and have for the better part of 20 years. Initially it was an anti-consumerist thing, but now it's just 'my brand' 🤣
apart from not wearing anything with logos myself, I have to agree with the likes of Steve Jobs and or Zuckerberg in the sense that taking 20 minutes to choose the "perfect" attire for the day is mentally consuming, and I totally get that thinking inherently. my time is so valuable that I cannot fathom wearing then re-wearing something else cause it doesn't match my mood for that day! When it come to clothing, simplicity is best but still with some style is for me all the way.
I try to avoid logos/brands on clothing, but sometimes find it's difficult to find without them. I have worn inexpensive Timex watches for years, and refuse to purchase a designer watch, partially because if something happens to my Timex, it doesn't cost much to replace.
I agree with some of these points, and personally don’t care for logos because I don’t want to be a walking billboard for a company. But I do think there’s something to be said about the community aspect to logos. When a Yankees fan sees a guy in a Yankees hat, they may start a conversation about baseball and make a connection. That doesn’t seem like a bad thing to me.
Interesting conversation Guys! Funny, on one hand I like Fashion and always look at fashion shows to see new design and concepts but the last decade many of the "high end" brands or labels all they offer is everything with their label one it. I have wonder if there are rich customers who shop these brands and are offered pieces without any of the Logos on it. Also makes me wonder if the rich may stay away from these brands completely. Keep up the good conversation going!
Its a bit of a moot point because not wearing a logo (or maybe wearing a very small logo) is as much a brand statement for minimalism than wearing a logo would for maybe a sports star or fashion icon. Most people use clothing to some extent to convey information to others about who they are what they do (or at least who they would like to be). Wearing a lot of logos would conflict with the minimalist ethos of not supporting consumerism. And I have noticed a lot of people choosing to do the same thing - to the point that logos are seen as uncool & behind the times. But then you get the people who are still happily into consumerism who still like wearing the logos because for them it does convey a positive message about who they are, how they want to feel and would like others to see them.
And then there are those of us who focus on the functionality and price points of items rather than going out of our way to buy or avoid items with logos.
@@username00009 Sure. But my point is - for these guys ‘the Minimalists’ wearing basic black or white and no or minimal logos is in reality as much of a brand statement for them - as wearing a Nike logo would be for a professional sports player. But there are some people who do see clothing in a purely functional way and are not bothered or concerned with the image or look of it.
I recently got some stickers from Natural grocers, and out one on top of the logo on the lid of my lap top. Traded one logo for another I suppose, but with a little humor, no one knows what kind of laptop I have. I've always disliked labels and logos.
🤣 This short piece cracked me up! 🤣 I'm about to go for a walk now, and I'll definitely have a smirk on my face when I see those "walking billboards" pass by me. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Not bothered if it has a logo or not. If it looks good at the right price then I'm happy.All my trainers are Nike and Adidas because they last me four to five years .
The only logos I will wear is if they're on a pair of sneakers. Even then, whatever logo it is will happen to be on the shoe with the style and comfort I'm after.
Isn’t the point behind the investment of blood, sweat and tears while building a brand, to reach a point where the logo, and brand built around it, tells / signifies the equity invested?
It's all false idolatry and it's fun. I like the Titleist logo on my golf clubs. Even if I play awful, I can be grateful for the logos and imagine I have the cool kid clubs. I appreciate all you guys do. Much of life is wasted on greedy self-centered delusions; it's a blackhole that won't ever be fed. Whatever, nevermind.
I didn't mind before whether my shirt has a logo or not. Eventually, I started to appreciate plain shirts more. At most, I'm okay with minimal design but never logos that try to be The Rock's chest tattoos. Although when we go to fancy places, I take advantage of what the logo can do by wearing my one Lacoste polo shirt.
What about those people who wear the massive ‘Polo Ralph Lauren’ logo on their shirts etc.? Talk about ‘desperate to be noticed and admired?! (by posers!) What happened to humility, and understatement? Some people are so nauseating. They make me sick! Fortunately we can do our own thing, and protest about this deliberate ostentation. Be a logo/ostentation rebel!
![Quando Rondo - Life Goes On [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eIf3fhMXAow/mqdefault.jpg)
I refuse to buy things with logos on them. Why PAY to advertise for a company? Hey if they give the merch with a logo away, I’ll consider it!
Agree, and I always add: If they want me to be a living advertisement, they should pay me, instead of me paying for a garment with a logo. I don't like to be used as an advertisement, much less pay for it. I don't even like to walk around with the bag of a shop with the logo in it, I see it as free advertisement too.
Your laptop doesn't have a logo? Your phone? Your mouse? Your keyboard? Your monitor? Your athletic shoes?
@@MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou Of course, but in the case of my phone and keyboard, you don't see the logo at all, and about my sport shoes, I try to buy the ones that have a less visible logo, but in this case it's quite hard to buy sth that nobody recognizes, for the rest, I buy things without logos. Anyway, I'm not going around with my computer or my monitor! So, I'm not making an advertisement for it. And I own a camera too, I just put a black sticku tape on the logo and changed the strap (which also has the logo in it) for a neutral one... I also unstitch the labels on my clothes and any small label that could be somewhere on the outside part. I take this very seriously! :D
@ Fair enough. I tend to wear clothes I like, and so I don't mind if the companies that made them get credit for it-if anyone actually cares to notice (which no one does).
@@MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou For laptop it is easy, find a nice sticker and stick it over it.
for a phone: phone case
My sister taught me this decades ago not to buy something with a logo and here is her reason. Her reason is that company does not pay you to advertise for them so why should I.
Something that really amazed me when I first came to the US from Latin America was the fact that people were really interested in getting a free t-shirt even if it had the logo of a company in it, not a clothing brand - It’s like they were happy to advertise any company for free, as long as they’d get one more piece of clothing. One of my first jobs here was recruiting blood donors, and we would either give two free movie tickets or a t-shirt with the company logo printed in it, in exchange for a blood donation. The majority of people preferred the t-shirt and would wear it out in public, so I was very puzzled by that. “Maybe they don’t have enough clothes?” was my first thought, but they did. Then, I also started seeing people walking around with the red, Coca-Cola t-shirt or a Starbucks logo. Later, I switched jobs to another company and I got “company swag” as a holiday gift. Why is my holiday gift as an employee, the chance to advertise you for free with what I wear? And why are my coworkers so excited about the “swag”?
By the way, my cousin (from my country) also wanted one of the free t-shirts from my old job, but she wanted it to sleep in it, never to wear it out in public!
Marketing and advertising can also become part of a culture, if we let it.
People love free stuff. They want the free T-shirts and swag in spite of the company logos, not because of them.
@@MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou It’s disrespectful. Pay us more, or give us a holiday bonus, and I’ll be able to buy a pack of plain, black t-shirts or something I actually need. Back in the day in my home country, companies used to give out baskets with food, for holidays. Not anymore.
@@virginiabyron
It's not meant to be substitute for anything.
@@MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou It’s meant to be a holiday gift, but it comes with an advertisement intent more than the intent of adding value to the employee’s life.
@@virginiabyron Companies exist to maximize long-term shareholder value. Seems like you have a problem with that.
I don't buy clothing specifically for a logo. I buy clothing that fits good & I feel good in.
It bothers me if the logo is looking, like it is the center of the item. If it is just a small logo on the sleeve or so, it does not really bother me, but i buy the things i need for their functionality and not because they are from manufacturer xy.
I honestly don't mind subtle logos especially if shirt itself is comfortable.
I am trying to ween myself of logos as part of my journey with minimalism. I have a few core brands which I wear, and have been loyal to for over 20 years (Carhartt WIP, Dickies, Vans, North Face) my issue is that these brands do tend to make incredibly durable and long lasting clothes, most of the time - and when I try to find unbranded. basic alternatives, the quality is not the same in a lot of other brands "basics". I live in London in the UK, so i have access to just about every option imaginable, but a lot of basics are just thin (low GSM fabrics) and not good quality construction. Eg, I have a handful of Carhartt branded hoodies which are over 5 years old and still as thick and cosy and in the same condition as when I purchased them. Likewise on their T-Shirts 240gsm tshirts that don't lose their shape or colour like cheaper JCREW or Uniqlo shirt. But as I get closer to 40, the idea of being a billboard for any brand is a bit weird to me, and overly branded clothes does tend to look slightly "young" which i guess is cool when you are 21, nor as much when you are 35+
I like the Dickies t-shirts because they last a long time and I don't mind the logo. The horseshoe logo actually gives the shirts character despite giving the company free advertising.
I've found a small discrete logo is a good way to stay with your favourite brands but not be a billboard and still look well dressed
It’s a shame more unknown brands don’t make more attractive lines I only wear Nike trainers because I like the shape/profile of them not because they’re are Nike. Same for Levi’s only because of it fits well and they last, apart from that the top half of what I wear is always non logo clothes like from next or primark in the UK.
Thoroughly recommend Rapanui for tops in the UK.
I'm like that with vans shoes to skate in. Everything else is brandless.
Tons of other great options besides Nike. You need to do a little more research and try other brands. I’m sure you can find good looking, good fitting clothes and shoes that are not made by the sweat shop, otherwise known as Nike.
@@FaithWolper which companies would you recommend?
@@FaithWolper Nike uses the same sweat shop labor as everybody else. They're just more known for it because they're more known. Unless you're buying clothes made in a developed country with high labor protection, you're not doing any better by simply avoiding Nike in favor of some less-popular brand with the same practices but less media scrutiny.
You can find high quality shirts out of organic cotton and sustainably produced from Organic Basics. No logos at all. 💙 Quality is amazing. Highly recommend!
What brand?
@@isvancabrera9341 It's called Organic Basics. Designed in Denmark, Europe.
I've heard of them before. I wish I could find a retail store that lets me try on their items.
@@PresbianTier Actually they have only one retail store in Copenhagen, Denmark. But maybe they work together with other stores. You could check on their website for a store finder and otherwise maybe use their size charts.
I own Organic Basics T- shirts. My favorite!
I'll wear clothing with a logo because anything I wear is fairly practical (Dickies, Carhartt, etc.), so if it helps other people find something practical for themselves, then it'll help them. I can't tell you the number of times I found something that I use regularly because the manufacturer's logo or info was on it. The only thing I wear now and again that has any "swag" value is a Blue Note T-shirt but I really dig Blue Note albums and nowadays, most people don't know what it is.
I saw this show about the rich kids of Dubai. One kid had a Louis Vuitton logod Bentley. It’s just bizarre. He could have bought whole houses for a homeless people with that cash.
I decided to buy an analogue watch
To stop myself being distracted by my phone checking the time.
I found a nice looking Diesel watch.
The thing that surprised me was the amount of people who told me my watch is trying to be a Rolex.
the absence of a logo is a logo in itself 🧘♂️
It's not just the free advertising that I'm against but also the capitalist & consumerist culture.
I choose to just keep wearing what I have at this moment... I believe this isn't a manifesto to tell people just give up things in their closet now for the clothes without logo.
If I see one more LV purse my head might explode lol 😆
I currently wear one item of clothing with an obvious logo. I don't like obvious logos, but I wanted this particular article of clothing for the quality and comfort and lack of choice at the time I needed it. I say I wear them despite the logo.
I wear ALL black to work. Nothing else. I stick to basics. Nothing fancy. No logos. But still professional. Easier to get dressed in the morning. Casual days is a black tank from Walmart and jeans.
A lot of women's stuff has logos. I didn't like it before minimalism or after.
I stopped liking most shirts because I saved up for some clothes and went out and got some shirts. Well. Almost everytime I wore them someone else wore same. A few times even to the point of being in same area where me and two others all seen each other wearing same. It became clear then that it's all a stupid game.
Can't wait to see/hear the entirety of this podcast.
Logos on clothing used to signify a seal of quality and people tried to buy the best they can afford. Clothing with Logos now (largely, there are a few exceptions) mean very little in terms of excellent quality (unless you are buying Couture) and are just pricer clothes with a picture or word on it. If it makes you happy and you can afford it, buy and wear what you like! The idea of an Auditorium full of "minimalists" gunning for a guy for wearing a logo HORRIFIES me! Xx
What about Batman? His logo is a symbol, something larger than himself, something enduring. Perhaps a logo can be good if, when people see it, they are inspired to do good. Like the Red Cross logo - oh I should donate blood. Not all brands are a symbol for status. Life is Good clothing is a symbol for optimism.
Even No Name brand is a brand. lol
logomania is horrible, just bragging objects
Im so happy that I have no idea what Chucks are
Converse Chuck Taylor All Star - it's a famous sneaker.
I just thought about this recently, I only wear blank hats and have for the better part of 20 years. Initially it was an anti-consumerist thing, but now it's just 'my brand' 🤣
apart from not wearing anything with logos myself, I have to agree with the likes of Steve Jobs and or Zuckerberg in the sense that taking 20 minutes to choose the "perfect" attire for the day is mentally consuming, and I totally get that thinking inherently. my time is so valuable that I cannot fathom wearing then re-wearing something else cause it doesn't match my mood for that day! When it come to clothing, simplicity is best but still with some style is for me all the way.
I try to avoid logos/brands on clothing, but sometimes find it's difficult to find without them. I have worn inexpensive Timex watches for years, and refuse to purchase a designer watch, partially because if something happens to my Timex, it doesn't cost much to replace.
EVERYONE needs a friend like Ryan that mmmm's after making assertions....
Stop that grunting!
I agree with some of these points, and personally don’t care for logos because I don’t want to be a walking billboard for a company. But I do think there’s something to be said about the community aspect to logos. When a Yankees fan sees a guy in a Yankees hat, they may start a conversation about baseball and make a connection. That doesn’t seem like a bad thing to me.
I love this! This is the best explanation on this topic I have heard. Thank you for putting words to it!
Something here I don’t see very often…3 smart, non materialistic guys together! Love you all!❤️
OMG! Even team colors are worse than logos! Sports fanatics are CRAZY!!!
Uniqlo is no logo - simple…and affordable!
Interesting conversation Guys! Funny, on one hand I like Fashion and always look at fashion shows to see new design and concepts but the last decade many of the "high end" brands or labels all they offer is everything with their label one it. I have wonder if there are rich customers who shop these brands and are offered pieces without any of the Logos on it. Also makes me wonder if the rich may stay away from these brands completely. Keep up the good conversation going!
Its a bit of a moot point because not wearing a logo (or maybe wearing a very small logo) is as much a brand statement for minimalism than wearing a logo would for maybe a sports star or fashion icon. Most people use clothing to some extent to convey information to others about who they are what they do (or at least who they would like to be). Wearing a lot of logos would conflict with the minimalist ethos of not supporting consumerism. And I have noticed a lot of people choosing to do the same thing - to the point that logos are seen as uncool & behind the times. But then you get the people who are still happily into consumerism who still like wearing the logos because for them it does convey a positive message about who they are, how they want to feel and would like others to see them.
And then there are those of us who focus on the functionality and price points of items rather than going out of our way to buy or avoid items with logos.
@@username00009 Sure. But my point is - for these guys ‘the Minimalists’ wearing basic black or white and no or minimal logos is in reality as much of a brand statement for them - as wearing a Nike logo would be for a professional sports player. But there are some people who do see clothing in a purely functional way and are not bothered or concerned with the image or look of it.
I recently got some stickers from Natural grocers, and out one on top of the logo on the lid of my lap top. Traded one logo for another I suppose, but with a little humor, no one knows what kind of laptop I have. I've always disliked labels and logos.
I love the white space in the background
Funny; my high schoolers were not allowed to wear a plain colored shirt. It had to have something on it or get sent home. Thanks to gangs I guess.
At 1:13 I would also add to that conversation that you have to be careful of Compulsive Buying. Don't always act on an Impluse.
Great listening I wear plain shirts no logos
🤣 This short piece cracked me up! 🤣
I'm about to go for a walk now, and I'll definitely have a smirk on my face when I see those "walking billboards" pass by me. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
NOT wearing logos doesn’t make you a better human being, but that “smirk” definitely says something about you.
Not bothered if it has a logo or not.
If it looks good at the right price then I'm happy.All my trainers are Nike and Adidas because they last me four to five years .
This is all so common sense. It’s astonishing so many people need to hear this to know this. But hey, that’s the same with so many things these days.
You guys are awesome
I feel loke walking billboard and the company even dont pay me 😂
I wanna hug everyone here
I’ll rock a logo sometimes depending on how large it is, but I draw the line at names. I’m not wearing some rich person’s name.
I got my mom fake Lacoste shirts on eBay for Christmas. What momma don't know, what hurt her
I only buy a something with logo if it means it’s better quality and it’s going to last a long time, however in most cases that’s not the case
Wearing clothes that fit properly is far more important.
Apparently minimalists have really good hair.
2:23 you're an walking billboard then.
If you are paying to advertise that is obviously ok.
The only logos I will wear is if they're on a pair of sneakers. Even then, whatever logo it is will happen to be on the shoe with the style and comfort I'm after.
Does anyone know companies or apps where you can purchase non-logo clothes?
RW&CO may have what you're looking for, Joshua Becker.
Great video
I don't like to wear logos because "advertisements suck". Why would I want be the advertisement, and pay for it?
Isn’t the point behind the investment of blood, sweat and tears while building a brand, to reach a point where the logo, and brand built around it, tells / signifies the equity invested?
I really do hate logos.
Ministry of supply V necks has no Logo.
It's all false idolatry and it's fun. I like the Titleist logo on my golf clubs. Even if I play awful, I can be grateful for the logos and imagine I have the cool kid clubs. I appreciate all you guys do. Much of life is wasted on greedy self-centered delusions; it's a blackhole that won't ever be fed. Whatever, nevermind.
logo on clothing means 'this person is sponsored by...'
What about rock band t-shirts?!?!
If you like the shirt but not the logo, why not just remove the logo? Most of the time a seam ripper is all it takes.
Your mic logo makes me want candy that melts in your mouth, not in your hands. Wierd.
I only buy a logo that pays me to buy them.
I didn't mind before whether my shirt has a logo or not. Eventually, I started to appreciate plain shirts more. At most, I'm okay with minimal design but never logos that try to be The Rock's chest tattoos.
Although when we go to fancy places, I take advantage of what the logo can do by wearing my one Lacoste polo shirt.
So… this channel isn’t sponsored by M&Ms??? 😂 😆 😝
Advertising is how the rich beg.
Who else had to read the title again because they read Lego? 😂
Amazing first world problems
What about those people who wear the massive ‘Polo Ralph Lauren’ logo on their shirts etc.? Talk about ‘desperate to be noticed and admired?! (by posers!) What happened to humility, and understatement? Some people are so nauseating. They make me sick! Fortunately we can do our own thing, and protest about this deliberate ostentation. Be a logo/ostentation rebel!
I'm practicing minimalism and I have a couple of Polo Ralph Lauren tees with the Bear. I guess I'm a poser lol.
Yeah, I don't get that. Most of my polos are Ralph Lauren just because I like how they look and fit, and the small logo is just the right size.
Love From INDIA' (BHARAT)🇮🇳
KEEP IT UP
😡I wish you you would just say it’s a snippet and IT IS MEANT FOR YOUR PATREON! 😡
these guys are millionaires...
Too much information , could have got this down to 1 minute max 😜👍
i dont believe u that u were at a coffee shop, no way bro >< had to sry i love u guys though
: )