I might dive deeper into this, but latency depends on your system. For me it is negligible, whereas for worse computers it might make all the difference.
@PlantiProductions This is not really related to the PC, but rather to how some DAVs handle it. As far as I know, ducking starts to fail in some when a large latency accumulates.
@PlantiProductions Thanks! But of course this doesn't change how useful Pro Q4 is. I would use both plugins. Trackspacer on groups for ducking, and Pro Q4 for working with the spectrum.
trackspacer has a faster 2 click workflow, q4 takes more clicks than soothe to get it as required. q4 also requires a lot more latency per instance than trackspacer or soothe, however it uses less cpu
What about latency? 69 ms in Pro Q4 at low quality (116 ms at medium) vs 0 ms in Trackspacer.
I might dive deeper into this, but latency depends on your system. For me it is negligible, whereas for worse computers it might make all the difference.
@PlantiProductions This is not really related to the PC, but rather to how some DAVs handle it. As far as I know, ducking starts to fail in some when a large latency accumulates.
@@young_neal5947 I just checked, and you're right! Your comment gets a pin for that ;)
@PlantiProductions Thanks! But of course this doesn't change how useful Pro Q4 is. I would use both plugins. Trackspacer on groups for ducking, and Pro Q4 for working with the spectrum.
Q4 is the GOAT, no joke.
trackspacer has a faster 2 click workflow, q4 takes more clicks than soothe to get it as required. q4 also requires a lot more latency per instance than trackspacer or soothe, however it uses less cpu
Thanks!
Yup, or if you have Neutron, use the Unmask feature. It's awesome.
gooood!!!
thanks ;)
Can u make video making ambatukam music
Lmfaooo
You made me look that up... 🥲
does this work with pq3
no