So happy to have worked together on this, Zevi. I really appreciate your content and approach and it's so lovely to be able to share this digital space with you!
Thank you Justin. That’s very kind of you to say. I’m a sold fanboy of your content and style as well. Looking forward to more good times together. Shabbat Shalom 😘
Curious to find you two teachers on the web. 🤘I’m Jason Jaramillo, MD. I work in central Brooklyn (Boro Park, Midwood) many of my colleagues and patients are Orthodox Jews. I finished my medical training at a hospital called Maimonides Medical Center 😅 I wish I could ingratiate myself with a reformed community just to help me up to date on certain cultural norms… happy Purim ps my dog is named Spinoza
Thank you for your excellent podcast, giving us an overview of the importance of Spinoza's philosophy. As a student of Spinoza's philosophy, I have studied Spinoza's Ethics extensively, and I believe to really understand Spinoza, you must live his ideas. I have more than a theoretical concept. After 40 years of work, I now teach, mentor, and coach those who want to live, understand, and love as Spinoza did.
Better and more fun than any of the graduate seminars I took a hundred years ago. Now 100 years older and anxious and depressed your videos make me look forward to starting my day each morning. Many thanks!
In these times, I can't of a more worthwhile endeavor than to bring to anyone that desires a clear unprejudiced account of history's great thinkers. Thanks much!
Zevi, your love and enthusiasm for the life and thought of Spinoza is both impressive and contagious. The quality of the video and your clear and precise verbal style greatly aid the subject matter. I've been reading and thinking about Spinoza's philosophy since the early 1960s. He has impressed me like no other thinker, neither ancient nor modern.
With stunning efficiency, you have stitch together, my rudimentary, understanding of decartes, quantum physics, the upanishads and Spinoza. Superb job. Thanks so much.
Thank you so much watching. Subscribe, Like and Share so we can make more 🙏 Check out Justin's collab vid here: Spinoza, Rationalist Atheist or Mystical Pantheist? ruclips.net/video/6Tg03chJpZ4/видео.html
I've had an interest in learning more about Spinoza for some time, but hadn't gotten around to it and maybe was a bit intimidated. This was a really awesome, well made and easy to follow introduction and honestly, from your explanation Spinoza's metaphysical ideas seem shockingly intuitive and familiar. Also, more broadly I enjoy how you connect and teach about Kabbalah with your content. In part because I don't come from a Jewish culture and haven't had much exposure to it I've felt slightly hesistant to dive deeper. But your channel has really piqued my interest in it. So glad I saw your collabs with Dr. Sledge and sought out your channel.
Was so confused when reading Ethics, this cleared everything up perfectly. You did an outstanding job at making his content easily digestible. Super interesting video and I'm looking forward to watching more!
I could not get through the Ethics without Jarrett's Spinoza, A Guide for the Perplexed (ha ha). I tried Aquinas years ago and found the same difficulties. But Spinoza did not put my teeth on edge.His philosophy comes from personal experience to abstraction to integration, psychological to or mystical (what can be be the difference?).
What an excellent and helpful introduction to Spinoza's metaphysical foundation! I'm slowly making my way through the Ethics, and this helps bring much clarity to understanding Spinoza's thought. Thank you!
An example of infinite modes which Spinoza gave to his fans at the time in a letter when asked, he stated an example for the extension attribute is "motion and rest" for example, and "the face/phase of the whole universe" as an example of the thought attribute
I liked the comparison to matter and energy. I haven't heard that before. Spinoza's incredible psychological insights were a tremendous eye-opener for me. 'No hope unmingled with fear, and no fear unmingled with hope'. I have always taken his thought-extension parallelism to be somewhat similar. 'No body without thought, and no thought without body'. It's quite logical to conclude that it's impossible for a body to live without a thought, or for a thought to live without a body.
Wow, Zevi. I am floored by how excellent and beautiful this video is. You did a great job breaking down the core concepts in Book one of the Ethics. But I also liked the first part where you described Spinoza's life and works. You love Spinoza, and it shows. I love Spinoza too, and like you, I am impressed with the sagely life that he lived. In regards to the one part: I don't think Spinoza's metaphysics is "more fit for consumption by machines than humans." Though, I guess I see where people who advance this criticism are coming from. I would say in response to this that Spinoza is profoundly concerned with the human condition... our bondage to certain emotions. As Spinoza sees it, understanding his philosophy has the potential to free us from this bondage. So in that sense, it is made precisely for human consumption. Can't wait for more of this.
Thank you so much Hal ☺️ That’s very kind. I love Spinoza and I’m glad it show. I agree with your reading %100 and i hope to bring out more of that as his mini-series goes on 🙏🏼
Hello and thanks for your efforts! I wanted to say that many of his ideas were already established by Mullah Sadra some 150 years back. Seek out primacy of existence, unity of being, and "Existential motion". Cheers.
I can see why Charles Hartshorne said that Spinoza was a pure Pantheist when people suggested that he was a Panentheist but a bit of a grey area as the single reality seems to have generated itself very similar to the One of Plotinus.therefore at some point,as much as words are meaningful to describe no thing, something must have been outside of reality but a thing with no frame of reference.modern Pantheists generally tend to see the universe as oscillating whereas modern Panentheists tend to see the universe having a begining but the thing that caused the beginning is without space and time.loved your rather lyrical waves in the ocean analogy and I suspect that is where the answer lies to such debates as to what happens upon death.
I have started to look into Spinoza's works! Very interesting. I believe that religions serve an important role of preventing flattening out reality into a too simplistic monism view, but that monism is the correct fundamental view of reality. Maybe similar to the Word in the Bible (John 1), Ein Sof in the Kabbalah, Brahman in Hinduism and dependent origination in Buddhism. It's all one interconnected wholeness! A unity.
Wow, super happy I found this channel! So, if I’m understanding correctly: Substance = That Which Is; Attributes = That Which Perceive of That Which Is; and Modes = The Result of The Perception of That Which Is. Did I get that right? Seems like Spinoza’s ideas have stood the test of time reasonably well. I’d like to see an exposition about the interplay between his ideas and Planck’s notion that consciousness is a fundamental force of nature. PLMK if you know of such a review!
Thank you for this video! Spinoza is fascinating! My only complaint about his philosophy is that he says that everything happens by necessity but necessity for the purpose of what? Since there’s no ultimate goal of life or nature in Spinozism why must everything necessarily happen as it does?
You’re most welcome Ethan. Thank you for joining us. Spinoza, as far as i understand him, does not mean it happens for a teleological necessity, an end or ultimate purpose, rather that the machine must run the way it does because there’s just no other option. With everything in place they must unfold a certain way. Kinda like what the Stoics thought. Think of his determinism as past oriented, not future oriented, namely, things must be the way they are because of what proceeded them, all the way back, not because of where they’re heading. Hope that helps 🙏🏼
The theory of emanations in Kabbalah, as represented through the Tree of Life and the Sephirots, aligns in some ways with pantheistic ideas, and it is possible that Kabbalistic thought could have influenced or found inspiration in pantheistic concepts.
Have you read Bruno’s Cause, Principle and Unity? It’s a very similar vision as Spinoza’s, in a readable and FUNNY dialogue of similar quality as Plato’s.
Thank you Gali. Thank you for joining the Seekers project, we’re having so much fun exploring these epic themes and glad to have you join the ride. Welcome 🙏🏼
Supposedly, when asked if he believed in god, Einstein answered, “I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of all that exists, but not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.”
I don’t know them well enough. But I think the mystical (i.e. unitive) minded philosophers might take umbrage with his belief in the complete inaccessible of the Noumenon, the Ding an sich. Take Schopenhauer for example who posits that whatever the Noumenous is, (in his case it’s “the Will”) must, by definition also be “within” in each of us, and we can therefore know the Noumenous in knowing ourselves, for it is what we are. Not that much unlike mystically minded theologians who will posit that the core of being “God,” “Braman” etc. is “within” us too, called soul, atman, etc. and therefore we can know true being, for we are truly true being.
pardon the extreme reductionism, kabbalah appears to me to be a neural network to train ones mind to balance left right brain traits and the relationships between emotions and actions to achieve the keter like pre-sociology psychiatry. By identification of the modes probable relations are found similar to Stephen wolframs theory (of everyting) which I guess a Spinozaesque mind body duality of kabbalah wolfram.
@@SeekersofUnity entirely the opposite. Instant spark connecting possible expressions and blurred for all to critique. I hold little value in these but intriguing thoughts to ponder on and I like blurring them to see what other people say and possibly see how search algorithms are impacted. Great content I look forward to more
I almost didn't watch this, taking "metaphysics" too literally, when this is broader than I feared. The terrible YuckTub interface cuts off the title too soon after that word, on the Smart TV.
.... I will be happy to discuss this online with you guys. I'm not hating on Spinoza or anyone, but I take as a matter of fact that his philosophy was a disaster. Trying to find the root cause.
Substance is by definition a composition of smaller substances. How something relates to itself is called essence. Not all substances are an essence. Also, where is consideration for Time? Again seems like basic axiom is that the world is Kadmon not Mechudash. I think I get it now. Substance Plunosium is maybe substance of Yuli, Spinoza should have known better. Wonder if he did it on purpose?
הגעתי אליך במקרה כשחיפשתי סרטונים על ג'ורדנו ברונו .. ממשיך כאן .. ומכאן .. אוסף נפלא של הרצאות .. תודה רבה לך .. נ.ב. האם תספר גם על הרמב"ם .. או שפיספסתי משהו?
Thanks for coming by. Glad you're enjoying it. We've touched on Rambam briefly in our classes on Jewish Pantheism but we hope to come back and dedicate more time just to him. Welcome to the channel.
Just as religions typically divide existence into God and non-God, they also split man into body and soul. They often say Soul is of God and body is not. I look at body as dense substance and mind as subtle substance. They are both the same substance but of different densities. They might be several layers to a humans of different densities but he is a single being, one substance of different densities. Even the universe is of one substance and of different densities, and all God.
Do you ever feel like a plastic bag Drifting through the wind, wanting to start again? Do you ever feel, feel so paper thin Like a house of cards, one blow from cavin' in? Do you ever feel already buried deep? Six feet under screams, but no one seems to hear a thing Do you know that there's still a chance for you? 'Cause there's a spark in you You just gotta ignite the light And let it shine Just own the night Like the Fourth of July 'Cause baby, you're a firework Come on, show 'em what you're worth Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh" As you shoot across the sky Baby, you're a firework Come on, let your colors burst Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh" You're gonna leave 'em all in awe, awe, awe You don't have to feel like a waste of space You're original, cannot be replaced If you only knew what the future holds After a hurricane comes a rainbow Maybe a reason why all the doors are closed So you could open one that leads you to the perfect road Like a lightning bolt, your heart will glow And when it's time, you'll know You just gotta ignite the light And let it shine Just own the night Like the Fourth of July 'Cause baby, you're a firework Come on, show 'em what you're worth Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh" As you shoot across the sky Baby, you're a firework Come on, let your colors burst Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh" You're gonna leave 'em all in awe, awe, awe Boom, boom, boom Even brighter than the moon, moon, moon It's always been inside of you, you, you And now it's time to let it through 'Cause baby, you're a firework Come on, show 'em what you're worth Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh" As you shoot across the sky Baby, you're a firework Come on, let your colors burst Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh" You're gonna leave 'em all in awe, awe, awe Boom, boom, boom Even brighter than the moon, moon, moon Boom, boom, boom Even brighter than the moon, moon, moon
Take it as a compliment that I feel compelled to correct your misuse of the plural, phenomena, when you are indicating a singular, ergo phenomenon. Your overall discourse is performed well enough that this repeated error stands out.
Sorry to say that But this bideo not only explain Spinoz But it even makes it more complicated Instead of bambarding the listeners with abstract words with a rather high pace, without any pauze and pictorial explanation I would rather take my time and try to find correct words to concisely explain what i mean. As a reference I would like to mention Dr. Leonard Peikhof. He explains philosophy the best way
Very much enjoying the presentation. Must take issue, however, with the assertion ~20:30 that we can't take Spinoza's approach to attributes seriously, because he was relating his philosophy to 17th C math and physics. Poppycock. There's absolutely nothing the laureates at CERN have accomplished with their billion$ upon billion$ of public funding except gaze deeper and deeper into their collective navels. Spinoza correctly anticipated quantum theory, despite the relative idiocy of his contemporaries. Just as the Tao demonstrates that ultimately everything is One and all yin/yang apparent polarities are simply illusory, dichotomies, so too does quantum theory dictate that the need for a distinction and definitive definition for what is a particle and what is a wave (mind/matter, matter/energy, body/soul, life/death, etc) is a function not of the thing itself ("Ding an sich") but rather a function of human consciousness, curiosity, and need for categorization. After all, consciousness appears to cause collapse of the wave function. Explain *that* with your infinitesimal "G0d particle," logical positivists.
Thank you for your work, but it seems your delivery seems to focus on, what we call “talking like the ancients” bring your methods of communication up to date please. Thank you
![Kumamoto Masters Japan 2024 | Gregoria Mariska Tunjung (INA) [5] vs. Akane Yamaguchi (JPN) [2] | F](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EIjZybhsWqA/mqdefault.jpg)
So happy to have worked together on this, Zevi. I really appreciate your content and approach and it's so lovely to be able to share this digital space with you!
Thank you Justin. That’s very kind of you to say. I’m a sold fanboy of your content and style as well. Looking forward to more good times together. Shabbat Shalom 😘
Esoterica, nice use of the "tzak" glyph 😉
Uvva uvva
Curious to find you two teachers on the web. 🤘I’m Jason Jaramillo, MD. I work in central Brooklyn (Boro Park, Midwood) many of my colleagues and patients are Orthodox Jews. I finished my medical training at a hospital called Maimonides Medical Center 😅
I wish I could ingratiate myself with a reformed community just to help me up to date on certain cultural norms… happy Purim
ps my dog is named Spinoza
“I do not know how to teach philosophy without becoming a disturber of the peace.”
Spinoza
Thank you for your excellent podcast, giving us an overview of the importance of Spinoza's philosophy. As a student of Spinoza's philosophy, I have studied Spinoza's Ethics extensively, and I believe to really understand Spinoza, you must live his ideas. I have more than a theoretical concept. After 40 years of work, I now teach, mentor, and coach those who want to live, understand, and love as Spinoza did.
Better and more fun than any of the graduate seminars I took a hundred years ago. Now 100 years older and anxious and depressed your videos make me look forward to starting my day each morning. Many thanks!
Aw Esther, I’m so glad to hear that. Thank you for the kind feedback. We’re in this together with you.
Love,
Zevi
In these times, I can't of a more worthwhile endeavor than to bring to anyone that desires a clear unprejudiced account of history's great thinkers. Thanks much!
Indeed. Thank you Robert. It's an honour.
Great presentation. Thank you.
You’re most welcome.
Zevi, your love and enthusiasm for the life and thought of Spinoza is both impressive and contagious. The quality of the video and your clear and precise verbal style greatly aid the subject matter. I've been reading and thinking about Spinoza's philosophy since the early 1960s. He has impressed me like no other thinker, neither ancient nor modern.
Thank you Tony. I’m so glad it comes across and honored to be able to share this great human.
This is one of the best explanation of Spinozas Ethics, I've read the ethics 1 time and I am in my second lecture and this helped a lot.
You’re most welcome. I’m glad it was helpful 🙏🏼
Keep them coming...enlighten all of us. Where the madman sinks and drowns, the mystic floats and swims. - AO -
Well said Asterox.
I admit I tried to watch this at 1.25x, but even that was too bold. Such richness! Thank you very much!
Haha thank you so much brother. I’m so glad you liked it.
Caramba, o criador do Estranha História!!!
Spinoza and Bruno have so much they could still teach the world.
With stunning efficiency, you have stitch together, my rudimentary, understanding of decartes, quantum physics, the upanishads and Spinoza. Superb job. Thanks so much.
You’re most welcome. Thank you for joining us.
Our boy really just pulled a “it’s the friends we made along the way” ❤
This channel seems excellent: highly inspired and expert content👍!
I love ur video. When I watched this video, I really interested Spinoza's Philosophy.
Thank you so much watching. Subscribe, Like and Share so we can make more 🙏 Check out Justin's collab vid here: Spinoza, Rationalist Atheist or Mystical Pantheist? ruclips.net/video/6Tg03chJpZ4/видео.html
I've had an interest in learning more about Spinoza for some time, but hadn't gotten around to it and maybe was a bit intimidated. This was a really awesome, well made and easy to follow introduction and honestly, from your explanation Spinoza's metaphysical ideas seem shockingly intuitive and familiar. Also, more broadly I enjoy how you connect and teach about Kabbalah with your content. In part because I don't come from a Jewish culture and haven't had much exposure to it I've felt slightly hesistant to dive deeper. But your channel has really piqued my interest in it. So glad I saw your collabs with Dr. Sledge and sought out your channel.
Was so confused when reading Ethics, this cleared everything up perfectly. You did an outstanding job at making his content easily digestible. Super interesting video and I'm looking forward to watching more!
You’re most welcome friend. Glad I could be of assistance. Welcome to the channel 🙏🏼
I could not get through the Ethics without Jarrett's Spinoza, A Guide for the Perplexed (ha ha). I tried Aquinas years ago and found the same difficulties. But Spinoza did not put my teeth on edge.His philosophy comes from personal experience to abstraction to integration, psychological to or mystical (what can be be the difference?).
Hey, don't mock us old guys with tweed jackets and tortoise be shell glasses. Ageism, dude!
What an excellent and helpful introduction to Spinoza's metaphysical foundation! I'm slowly making my way through the Ethics, and this helps bring much clarity to understanding Spinoza's thought. Thank you!
You’re most welcome. Glad we could be of assistance 🙏🏼
you're going to be the saviour I needed for my exam! thanks :)
Really well put together. I look up to you and your clear way of speaking!👍👍👍
Thank you. I appreciate that. Thank you for joining us.
I really enjoyed this video,,God bless your week ahead.
Excellent, thank you! 🙏
An example of infinite modes which Spinoza gave to his fans at the time in a letter when asked, he stated an example for the extension attribute is "motion and rest" for example, and "the face/phase of the whole universe" as an example of the thought attribute
Your water wave analogy for substance and mode is fully justified because Spinoza used that comparison in the Ethics. 😊
This is a great piece. 🖖
Thank you
@@SeekersofUnity thank YOU - subscribed. ✌️
Welcome 🙏🏼
Thank you for presenting. Spinoza could be very valuable to society. He had a good understanding of peace.
Great presentation with enjoyable humor. I laughed out loud several times. :)
WOW !!! Thank you very much for a very nice, comfortable, interesting lecture!!!
Stellar presentation. I'm so glad I discovered this channel!
Thank you Mark. Glad you found us ;)
I liked the comparison to matter and energy. I haven't heard that before. Spinoza's incredible psychological insights were a tremendous eye-opener for me. 'No hope unmingled with fear, and no fear unmingled with hope'. I have always taken his thought-extension parallelism to be somewhat similar. 'No body without thought, and no thought without body'. It's quite logical to conclude that it's impossible for a body to live without a thought, or for a thought to live without a body.
Thank you. Truly incredible stuff. Thank you for adding that 🙏🏼
We talked about Spinoza with our secular scientist pal recently... cracking up about more synchronicity with your content brother
That’s too good. I’ll have to see that convo. Who was it with?
Always thankful for your content 🙏.
You’re most welcome. Thank you 🙏🏼
There is no philosopher which caused me as much joy as he did
Great video. Spinoza is always enjoyable to hear about.
SO happy I accidently came across him. Learning so much about him.
You might just be related to him 😏
Another great Spinozian video, thanks again.
You’re most welcome. Thank you
Wow, Zevi. I am floored by how excellent and beautiful this video is. You did a great job breaking down the core concepts in Book one of the Ethics. But I also liked the first part where you described Spinoza's life and works. You love Spinoza, and it shows. I love Spinoza too, and like you, I am impressed with the sagely life that he lived.
In regards to the one part: I don't think Spinoza's metaphysics is "more fit for consumption by machines than humans." Though, I guess I see where people who advance this criticism are coming from. I would say in response to this that Spinoza is profoundly concerned with the human condition... our bondage to certain emotions. As Spinoza sees it, understanding his philosophy has the potential to free us from this bondage. So in that sense, it is made precisely for human consumption.
Can't wait for more of this.
Thank you so much Hal ☺️ That’s very kind. I love Spinoza and I’m glad it show. I agree with your reading %100 and i hope to bring out more of that as his mini-series goes on 🙏🏼
8
"I do not know much my friend ,
but totally enjoyed your metaphysics teaching of Spinoza .......
.THANK YOU
You’re most welcome Andrew. Glad you enjoyed it.
Another great video. Thank you! I appreciate you 🙏
Thank you so much Francis. We appreciate you 🙏🏼
Hello and thanks for your efforts! I wanted to say that many of his ideas were already established by Mullah Sadra some 150 years back. Seek out primacy of existence, unity of being, and "Existential motion". Cheers.
Amazing video. Thanks for sharing.
You’re most welcome. Thank you.
Can't wait to get done with work and watch!
The chair part, by the way, really got me laughing. You are quite a character, mister! (In the best imaginable sense!)
Haha I’m glad. I wish i could understand Portuguese (?) to watch your content. You channel looks really great.
S.A.M. Substance, Attributes & Mode (modus operandi;) Uncle Sam came to mind and then you mentioned the Founding Fathers! ❤
Einstein's observations are very interesting and relevant, in my opinion.
I can see why Charles Hartshorne said that Spinoza was a pure Pantheist when people suggested that he was a Panentheist but a bit of a grey area as the single reality seems to have generated itself very similar to the One of Plotinus.therefore at some point,as much as words are meaningful to describe no thing, something must have been outside of reality but a thing with no frame of reference.modern Pantheists generally tend to see the universe as oscillating whereas modern Panentheists tend to see the universe having a begining but the thing that caused the beginning is without space and time.loved your rather lyrical waves in the ocean analogy and I suspect that is where the answer lies to such debates as to what happens upon death.
Great channel, good work here
Thank you James 🙏🏼
Aesthetics is in my opinion something missing in philosophy. I enjoyed your contribution and exposition with prose. Delightful…
Thank you Rob. Couldn’t agree with you more. Philosophy needs beauty and poetry no less than any other art. Yours…
I think I just fell in love! Not sure if I fell in love with Spinoza when I fell in love with Zevi or the other way round!
Baruch HaShem love both of theses channels
Thank you for helping me understand me
You’re most welcome.
love this so much.
Yay. Thank you :)
What i enjoy about this is the use of rhetoric to celebrate the lack if rheroric in Spinoza
;)
Great, thank you!
You’re welcome. Thank you Noah.
hi , thankyou , really interesting.
I have started to look into Spinoza's works! Very interesting. I believe that religions serve an important role of preventing flattening out reality into a too simplistic monism view, but that monism is the correct fundamental view of reality. Maybe similar to the Word in the Bible (John 1), Ein Sof in the Kabbalah, Brahman in Hinduism and dependent origination in Buddhism. It's all one interconnected wholeness! A unity.
Wow, super happy I found this channel! So, if I’m understanding correctly: Substance = That Which Is; Attributes = That Which Perceive of That Which Is; and Modes = The Result of The Perception of That Which Is. Did I get that right?
Seems like Spinoza’s ideas have stood the test of time reasonably well. I’d like to see an exposition about the interplay between his ideas and Planck’s notion that consciousness is a fundamental force of nature. PLMK if you know of such a review!
Glad you found us. Yes. I think that’s a tidy description you’ve put forth. Thank you. Welcome to the channel 🙏🏼
@@SeekersofUnity Great! Thanks for the reply.
Nice work I have just recently come across yourself and Justin and am thoroughly enjoying your work.
Thank you for this video! Spinoza is fascinating!
My only complaint about his philosophy is that he says that everything happens by necessity but necessity for the purpose of what? Since there’s no ultimate goal of life or nature in Spinozism why must everything necessarily happen as it does?
You’re most welcome Ethan. Thank you for joining us. Spinoza, as far as i understand him, does not mean it happens for a teleological necessity, an end or ultimate purpose, rather that the machine must run the way it does because there’s just no other option. With everything in place they must unfold a certain way. Kinda like what the Stoics thought. Think of his determinism as past oriented, not future oriented, namely, things must be the way they are because of what proceeded them, all the way back, not because of where they’re heading. Hope that helps 🙏🏼
@@SeekersofUnity Thank you! That does help!
"The experienced subjective sensation of Love expressed under the attribute of thought, wich... ive read, is a very beautiful experience" 😢
If you think this is cool, dive into the Mandukya Upanishad, and the Drg Drsya Viveka
Very good.
The theory of emanations in Kabbalah, as represented through the Tree of Life and the Sephirots, aligns in some ways with pantheistic ideas, and it is possible that Kabbalistic thought could have influenced or found inspiration in pantheistic concepts.
Have you read Bruno’s Cause, Principle and Unity? It’s a very similar vision as Spinoza’s, in a readable and FUNNY dialogue of similar quality as Plato’s.
Spinoza was a Monotheist but majority fail to understand Sufistic chants
We modern peripatetics may live in the wake of Nietzsche and Freud, but all of us walk in the shadow of Spinoza...
Cool video man. Dont worry about impostor syndrome, this was my first impression of you and I'm subbing as I type lol
Thank you Gali. Thank you for joining the Seekers project, we’re having so much fun exploring these epic themes and glad to have you join the ride. Welcome 🙏🏼
Supposedly, when asked if he believed in god, Einstein answered, “I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of all that exists, but not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.”
Who defines what constitutes the worthiness of a life one leads?
Love love love
😍
thank you
You’re most welcome 🙏🏼
On Harold Bloom...did you say / actually mean "notorious"? as in famous/infamous for negative reasons?
Do you like Imanuel Kant's metaphysics?
I don’t know them well enough. But I think the mystical (i.e. unitive) minded philosophers might take umbrage with his belief in the complete inaccessible of the Noumenon, the Ding an sich. Take Schopenhauer for example who posits that whatever the Noumenous is, (in his case it’s “the Will”) must, by definition also be “within” in each of us, and we can therefore know the Noumenous in knowing ourselves, for it is what we are. Not that much unlike mystically minded theologians who will posit that the core of being “God,” “Braman” etc. is “within” us too, called soul, atman, etc. and therefore we can know true being, for we are truly true being.
pardon the extreme reductionism, kabbalah appears to me to be a neural network to train ones mind to balance left right brain traits and the relationships between emotions and actions to achieve the keter like pre-sociology psychiatry. By identification of the modes probable relations are found similar to Stephen wolframs theory (of everyting) which I guess a Spinozaesque mind body duality of kabbalah wolfram.
That’s a fascinating hypothesis. I can see you’ve packed a lot of thought into that one small paragraph.
@@SeekersofUnity entirely the opposite. Instant spark connecting possible expressions and blurred for all to critique. I hold little value in these but intriguing thoughts to ponder on and I like blurring them to see what other people say and possibly see how search algorithms are impacted. Great content I look forward to more
Fascinating. Thank you 🙏🏼
Spinoza's metaphysics sounds remarkably similar to that of a contemporary thinker: Bernardo Kastrup.
but how does finite modes comes in existence. how can infinite produce finite
Thank you so much. Can you answer me a question?
How can we properly adapt studying lifes of some great people for ourselfs...?
Sorry for my english.
Sorry. I’m not sure i understand the question.
AMAZING.. Thank you..
You’re most welcome 🙏🏼
Recently saw Rav Kook call Spinoza a "spiritual catastrophe"
I almost didn't watch this, taking "metaphysics" too literally, when this is broader than I feared. The terrible YuckTub interface cuts off the title too soon after that word, on the Smart TV.
What about Titus Lucretius Carus? I am not a philosopher, but do think that monism is influenced by him.
.... I will be happy to discuss this online with you guys. I'm not hating on Spinoza or anyone, but I take as a matter of fact that his philosophy was a disaster. Trying to find the root cause.
Hi, Whats the best english translation of Spinoza?
Considering time and space are both being created ex-nihilu, geometry itself is a created entity, not an infinite boundary.
Substance is by definition a composition of smaller substances. How something relates to itself is called essence. Not all substances are an essence. Also, where is consideration for Time? Again seems like basic axiom is that the world is Kadmon not Mechudash. I think I get it now. Substance Plunosium is maybe substance of Yuli, Spinoza should have known better. Wonder if he did it on purpose?
My guess is the root cause of failure of this system are the axioms. Looking forward to learning what those are...
הגעתי אליך במקרה כשחיפשתי סרטונים על ג'ורדנו ברונו .. ממשיך כאן .. ומכאן .. אוסף נפלא של הרצאות .. תודה רבה לך .. נ.ב. האם תספר גם על הרמב"ם .. או שפיספסתי משהו?
Thanks for coming by. Glad you're enjoying it. We've touched on Rambam briefly in our classes on Jewish Pantheism but we hope to come back and dedicate more time just to him. Welcome to the channel.
@@SeekersofUnity
Thanks enjoining and learning
What book can I get to understand Reb Baruch from a chabad perspective
That’s a great question. I don’t know if such a book has been written.
Share: Did I see you fingers vibrate in your video? Listen to Talking Heads ‘Radiohead’. 🎉
Would Spinoza be referring to the Ether as the unifying substance?
Hmm i don’t think so. I think Substance is something more fundamental/basic/ontologically prior for him.
Just as religions typically divide existence into God and non-God, they also split man into body and soul. They often say Soul is of God and body is not. I look at body as dense substance and mind as subtle substance. They are both the same substance but of different densities. They might be several layers to a humans of different densities but he is a single being, one substance of different densities. Even the universe is of one substance and of different densities, and all God.
What does that actually mean?
Do you ever feel like a plastic bag
Drifting through the wind, wanting to start again?
Do you ever feel, feel so paper thin
Like a house of cards, one blow from cavin' in?
Do you ever feel already buried deep?
Six feet under screams, but no one seems to hear a thing
Do you know that there's still a chance for you?
'Cause there's a spark in you
You just gotta ignite the light
And let it shine
Just own the night
Like the Fourth of July
'Cause baby, you're a firework
Come on, show 'em what you're worth
Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh"
As you shoot across the sky
Baby, you're a firework
Come on, let your colors burst
Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh"
You're gonna leave 'em all in awe, awe, awe
You don't have to feel like a waste of space
You're original, cannot be replaced
If you only knew what the future holds
After a hurricane comes a rainbow
Maybe a reason why all the doors are closed
So you could open one that leads you to the perfect road
Like a lightning bolt, your heart will glow
And when it's time, you'll know
You just gotta ignite the light
And let it shine
Just own the night
Like the Fourth of July
'Cause baby, you're a firework
Come on, show 'em what you're worth
Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh"
As you shoot across the sky
Baby, you're a firework
Come on, let your colors burst
Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh"
You're gonna leave 'em all in awe, awe, awe
Boom, boom, boom
Even brighter than the moon, moon, moon
It's always been inside of you, you, you
And now it's time to let it through
'Cause baby, you're a firework
Come on, show 'em what you're worth
Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh"
As you shoot across the sky
Baby, you're a firework
Come on, let your colors burst
Make 'em go, "Oh, oh, oh"
You're gonna leave 'em all in awe, awe, awe
Boom, boom, boom
Even brighter than the moon, moon, moon
Boom, boom, boom
Even brighter than the moon, moon, moon
Take it as a compliment that I feel compelled to correct your misuse of the plural, phenomena, when you are indicating a singular, ergo phenomenon.
Your overall discourse is performed well enough that this repeated error stands out.
Sorry to say that
But this bideo not only explain Spinoz
But it even makes it more complicated
Instead of bambarding the listeners with abstract words with a rather high pace, without any pauze and pictorial explanation
I would rather take my time and try to find correct words to concisely explain what i mean.
As a reference I would like to mention Dr. Leonard Peikhof. He explains philosophy the best way
🙏🏼
Very much enjoying the presentation. Must take issue, however, with the assertion ~20:30 that we can't take Spinoza's approach to attributes seriously, because he was relating his philosophy to 17th C math and physics. Poppycock. There's absolutely nothing the laureates at CERN have accomplished with their billion$ upon billion$ of public funding except gaze deeper and deeper into their collective navels. Spinoza correctly anticipated quantum theory, despite the relative idiocy of his contemporaries.
Just as the Tao demonstrates that ultimately everything is One and all yin/yang apparent polarities are simply illusory, dichotomies, so too does quantum theory dictate that the need for a distinction and definitive definition for what is a particle and what is a wave (mind/matter, matter/energy, body/soul, life/death, etc) is a function not of the thing itself ("Ding an sich") but rather a function of human consciousness, curiosity, and need for categorization. After all, consciousness appears to cause collapse of the wave function. Explain *that* with your infinitesimal "G0d particle," logical positivists.
According to people who have NDEs, Spinoza got it right... almost. I can do without the Islamophobia.
I thought this video had millions of views…whyy
Give it a share and we’ll get it there ;)
Thank you for your work, but it seems your delivery seems to focus on, what we call “talking like the ancients” bring your methods of communication up to date please. Thank you
Thank you for the pointer 🙏🏼