The mainstream Carnivores media- biased against the Chasmosaurus- what a surprise! Claiming to disregard personal opinion while lambasting the Chasmosaurus. You, sir, are fake news! Sad!
Typical Ceratopsian. All roar, no digging, sounds good, doesn't work, never gonna happen. Our game is suffering because Ceratopsians like Chasmosaurus have such bad design, in terms of appearance, in terms of Burian's design, now look- we have the worst revival of a game franchise since Command & Conquer, and believe me, we're in a bubble right now. And the only thing that looks good is the Triceratops, but if you raise interest from the community even a little bit that's gonna come crashing down. We're in a big, fat, Chasmosaurus-shaped bubble.
I have just been informed- by some sources- that the Crooked Triceratops will undergo NO federal investigation. Like I have said, the system is totally rigged!
In the wake of these rising Chasmosaurus rates - the worst we've ever seen, I might add - we're gonna build a Dinosaur Wall around Fort Ciskin, and we're gonna make The Ancients pay for it, and it'll be the best Dinosaur Wall ever built, you believe me.
I made a little headcanon to cover up this nonsense; Chasmosaurus is actually a subspecies of Triceratops native to the C2 sector. Triceratops is a larger, slower herbivore because the only real threat it has to face is the T.Rex, plus the islands are small, so it doesn't have to travel much. Meanwhile, Chasmosaurus has to put up a fight not only with the numerous T.rexes, but with Ceratosaurus as well. So in order to survive it relies on speed outrunning whatever it can't outgun, explaining it's lighter build. As for the name, DinoHunt Corp. didn't want to cause confusion so gave it a cool name.
While I prefer Triceratops personally, Chasmo has done a lot more for the community. So many well crafted models have come from its base, and it has a much more skin friendly UV map imo.
I like the _Triceratops_ better in all ways but the call. I still have a lot of nostalgia for _Chasmosaurus_ though, the mobile port, Carnivores: Dinosaur Hunter, was on my iPad when I was young, so I kind of grew up with it.
The age old debate continues, but which dinosaur you guys think is better: Triceratops or Chasmosaurus? Be sure to let me know! Tomorrow, Primal Prey strikes back with vicious force and Sunday I take on a challenge that almost broke me...
I have a theory. Maybe during the development of Carnivores 2, the developers were going to design the Chasmosaurus after Burian’s artwork and give it it’s own animations, but perhaps due to time or budget they decided the best method would be to copy and paste the Triceratops model, give it some tweaks, and give it new sounds
Indeed. I played C2 when it came out but after a few hours in I returned to C1 due to 2 feeling like little more than a traditional FPS under the faux veil of a hunting game.
Personally, I find myself being neutral to both the Triceratops, and the maligned Chasmosaurus. With the classic Triceratops, I automatically get reminded of the times that the Triceratops and the Tyrant Lizard King may have engaged in combat with each other. With the Chasmosaurus, I don't have that much positive things to say about it. It's essentially the same thing as the Carnivores 1 Triceratops, and it's one of those pointable animals that I don't find to be worth hunting. So, if I had to pick, I'd go with the classic Triceratops.
I grew up with my first Carnivores game being Carnivores 2. I remember seeing a Chasmosaurus for the first time at Delphaeus Hills. I wasn't surprised or amazed, just simply was like "oh cool a new dino i've never heard of". Although I did get to see the Triceratops later, I wasn't really amazed at it either. You could probably see that i'm very neutral in this debate, seeing that i'm ok with either the Triceratops or the Chasmosaurus. In conclusion, I just wanna hunt dinosaurs.
I have a feeling that the _Chasmosaurus_ doesn't really look like a _Chasmosaurus_ because the square frill wouldn't look good on _Triceratops_ rig, which is designed for a rounder frill.
You make a lot of good points. I shared that initial ''where's the Triceratops?" moment for sure. It defenitely does read a lot more like a Triceratops than a Chasmosaurus, with the shorter frill and large browhorns. I do like the Chasmosaurus though. A lot of the things like the shared animations with trike personally are not a bad thing for me. Makes them feel like closely related animals. Similar, but different species, like bison and cows. That greyish and pale orange is a real hit for me personally. Plus mostly the Herbivores are based on Burian's artwork, the carnivores are more inspired by Jurassic park and other dinosaur renaissance art. The Chasmo sort of works as a transition between the artstyles in my opinion.
i never liked the triceratops from C1 i liked Chasmo more because of the updated model i think that even Burian would be disappointed in the model, it looks so awkward i wish the brought it back with a more accurate depiction of Burian's artwork
I like both. But the Chasmosaurus has a awesome roar and I grew up watching Carnivore videos (mainly Carnivores 2) and playing the mobile Carnivores games so I could only hunt the Chasmosaurus.
Since I played Carnivores 2 first, I didn't really mind that much, or really noticed at that age lol, that they had Chasmosaurus instead,however when I eventually played Carnivores 1, I realized the Trike was the original and was unfairly replaced in the sequel. I also remember thinking that the Chasmosaurus didn't even look like a chasmosaurus whatsoever even for being on a dinosaur planet with inaccurate dinosaurs, it was TOO inaccurate XD
I'm not going to lie, I still kind of prefer the Chasmosaurus design, even with knowing the original inspirations and whatnot. While I would have prefered a design closer to a more realistic Chasmosaurus, I just find the colors and frill more original and intimidating. The only thing I can say for the Triceratops is that it certainly looks beefier, especially with how close the back is to the frill, I like that aspect of its design. I don't really have a preference, I just accept the two for what they are and enjoy them. I can almost guarantee that if Triceratops is not added to the IOS versions soon, that it will be one of the first mods in the Steam release to be made.
Ahh! You heathen! Shun! We must shun the nonbeliever!!! Haha Hey, fair enough! Nice to see someone standing up for the Chasmosaurus. And yes, the Trike definitely has beefiness on its side. xD
At least I admit to the positives of both sides! It also doesn't help that I didn't get to hunt a trike until I downloaded Carnivores Reloaded last year. Maybe the lankyness of the Chasmosaurus helps to differentiate it for me.
Honestly I grew up hunting the Chasmosaurus but playing Carnivores Reloaded I realize that the Triceratops feels more challenging to hunt than the Chasmosaurus (I never played Carnivores 1 but I did play alot of Carnivores 2). But when it comes down to it I still prefer to hunt the Chasmosaurus because its alot more aggressive than the Triceratops and it at least attacks more often than the Trike has. (Seriously I tried like six times already to be killed by a Triceratops but no dice)
Well the first time I ever play Carnivores was on a moble game from a tablet and I saw Chasmosaurus and I thought they accidentally use the wrong name for it then i saw the first ever Carnivores hunting game I was shocked I was wrong there were a triceratops in older game
I remember this video has a part which is on twitter of Dinosaur Destroy where Tatem games send him a message and reveal his full name and the name is redacted. I think its in a different video or its my mind with mandela effect.
1:20 Wait, eight? Parasaurolophus, Pachycephalosaurus, Stegosaurus, Allosaurus, Triceratops, Velociraptor, T-Rex… what’s the eighth? On the topic of this debate, as a kid, I never had any side in this debate - as a kid, I was disappointed the Triceratops didn’t look like the one from Jurassic Park-but, at the time, I didn’t understand the theme or know about Burian’s art style. Nowadays, though, I have to say I’m firmly in camp Triceratops. Once I heard you break down the theme of ‘these are alien animals that resemble dinosaurs, and coincidentally evolved such that they resembled classic era paleo artwork”, that was it for me. Realizing that really cemented my appreciation for it. I do Carnivores 1 themed hunts on the mobile game often, and whenever I’m selecting dinosaurs, the triceratops is sorely missed. If anyone still pays attention to the mobile game, I hope it gets added in at some point.
I like triceratops the most because of its design it’s so bulky the modern-day ones are just skinny I mean you can just see their bones through there skin
I remember when I was a kid, I saw the Carnivores app in the Android App Store, I remember playing it till night and specifically disappointed for the Chasmosaurus because I was bias of Triceratops was my favorite. At that time, I remember thinking to myself, “Chasmosaurus looks like this? Can’t they just rename or recolour it?”
[Chimes in very late to this argument] Personally, I feel the Triceratops is better //for what Carnivores was//. When the first Carnivores was released, dinosaurs weren't widely known (by the general public), so there was this still idea that dinosaurs were these huge, lumbering titans, these perceptions further enhanced by the Jurassic Park films. The Triceratops very much reflected what the public wanted and expected from dinosaurs at the time, and I loved how huge and beefy it was. While I don't believe it should have been removed in Carnivores 2, I kinda wouldn't have had a problem if it was just 'updated' for Carnivores 2, along with the other dinosaurs. I was disappointed that a lot of dinosaurs made a comeback for Carnivores 2, even the T-rex. I mean, I'd hunted it before so yeah... not really that special to kill it again. An update / revamp / replacement for every dinosaur was in order, and it's a shame that only a select few dinosaurs got that treatment. This is why I feel the Chasmosaurus is a good dinosaur for the mobile release, as Ceratopsians are no longer perceived as those lumbering bus-sized behemoths, some are well known and accepted to be smaller and quicker, yet to make up for its smaller size the Chasmosaurus does boast a lovely array of horns. That being said though, I still see no reason for it to have been renamed. Their Ankylosaurus could have very easily been rehashed as a Euoplocephalus, and yet only the Trike got this treatment... weird. So yeah, to conclude, perceptions change and change isn't bad, but the Triceraptops lifespan was unreasonably cut short. Replacing it wouldn't have been a problem if //every// dinosaur was replaced AND both it and the Chasmo were included in the mobile port, just like the Pachycephalosaurus and Ankylosaurus were both included, despite the former being replaced by the latter.
No worries, there's never a "late to this argument" here! I still get chewed out in the comments of videos I made a year ago. xD Very good points! I totally agree on the redundancy of returning dinosaurs (it just makes Carnivores 2 feel even more like an expansion pack), but I never even considered that the Chasmosaurus fit the mobile port as a representation of the public's newer perception of dinosaurs (specifically ceratopsians). Great thoughts!
Hey I have an idea! Maybe Tatem can use the Triceratops in the survival hunts. That would be very good as we could see the Triceratops in another game adaptation, though as a minor cameo.
I’m all for authenticity, the chasmosaurus depicted in the sequel doesn’t look like the illustrations of Burian. BUT that doesn’t make them any worse than the Triceratops for merely deviating.
I have to say that The Triceratops is 100% the better animal but... the time i spent playing Carnivores 2 (it was one of the first games i ever played, and i have over 300 hours on it) makes me love the Chasmpsaurus even tho is flawed and uninspired 😅
oh, it's either A, Triceratops and the other Trike or B, Chasmosaurus. I got it, I got it, it's C, the answer is C, The triceratops and the chasmosaurus. I think they will rename the ceratopsian from Chasmosaurus to the accurate Triceratops.
Whoa, the Dimorphodon and Archaeopteryx look just like Zdenek Burian's art. For the ceratopsian debate, Triceratops is a more iconic and larger and advanced dinosaur. But of course it is nice to see other species be brought to the series, including some of the previous ancestors like Chasmosaurus. The primary thing I am disappointed with Triceratops is it's inaccurate design.
Poharex meh I don't like the design either though more because I just don't like the proportions looks like a dang pig basically if the artwork dinosaur gained weight.
Honestly, I liked the body build, call, and color scheme of Chasmosaurus(basically re-creating a "more realistic Triceratops"), but I also prefer the idea of a well-known dinosaur in the game, so I'm tied
saurian target can u do a mod showcase of carnivores modern age the one with today animals please all your vids are so great your. my favorite youtuber by far I didnt get the point of carnivores dinosaur hunter until I started watching your channel plus I was the 997 sub
when I was 6 i entered carn. 2 and saw chasmo and thought : hey trike is cool then used binoculars and saw chasmo, i was dissapointed cause I knew what a chasmo was and that wasnt a chasmo and I am only 13
Saurain target you are a gamingbever fan I know you are or someone faked you but you are a great youtuber and you make carnivores videos my favorite game you one of the best I personly beleive you should have 999999999999999999999999999 subs and do more carnivors 1 things and maybe do livestreams
I want triceratops is going into mobile and the model for the casmasaurs model that pohorex made is so awesome I really wish that is going to be the model for th 2 game and mobile your mod skins and everything look great to great job for 2 k subs and great job for pohorex for the "real"casmasaurus model=) great job for 2k I am glad to see the community grow to the more subs the more vids
The mainstream Carnivores media- biased against the Chasmosaurus- what a surprise! Claiming to disregard personal opinion while lambasting the Chasmosaurus. You, sir, are fake news! Sad!
The jig is up! I'm quitting RUclips and moving on to CNN!
"Chasmosaurus Naysayer Network"
Typical Ceratopsian. All roar, no digging, sounds good, doesn't work, never gonna happen. Our game is suffering because Ceratopsians like Chasmosaurus have such bad design, in terms of appearance, in terms of Burian's design, now look- we have the worst revival of a game franchise since Command & Conquer, and believe me, we're in a bubble right now. And the only thing that looks good is the Triceratops, but if you raise interest from the community even a little bit that's gonna come crashing down. We're in a big, fat, Chasmosaurus-shaped bubble.
I have just been informed- by some sources- that the Crooked Triceratops will undergo NO federal investigation. Like I have said, the system is totally rigged!
In the wake of these rising Chasmosaurus rates - the worst we've ever seen, I might add - we're gonna build a Dinosaur Wall around Fort Ciskin, and we're gonna make The Ancients pay for it, and it'll be the best Dinosaur Wall ever built, you believe me.
I made a little headcanon to cover up this nonsense; Chasmosaurus is actually a subspecies of Triceratops native to the C2 sector. Triceratops is a larger, slower herbivore because the only real threat it has to face is the T.Rex, plus the islands are small, so it doesn't have to travel much. Meanwhile, Chasmosaurus has to put up a fight not only with the numerous T.rexes, but with Ceratosaurus as well. So in order to survive it relies on speed outrunning whatever it can't outgun, explaining it's lighter build. As for the name, DinoHunt Corp. didn't want to cause confusion so gave it a cool name.
I really like that. Honestly, I've been going with something similar to that personally just to make sense of the whole scenario.
While I prefer Triceratops personally, Chasmo has done a lot more for the community. So many well crafted models have come from its base, and it has a much more skin friendly UV map imo.
Good call. Many excellent new ceratopsians exist thanks to the Chasmosaurus.
I just see chasmasaurus in the title and i said to myself: ooooh my, Saurian is going to be on fire XD
You know me so well. xD
I like the _Triceratops_ better in all ways but the call. I still have a lot of nostalgia for _Chasmosaurus_ though, the mobile port, Carnivores: Dinosaur Hunter, was on my iPad when I was young, so I kind of grew up with it.
I also did my dude :)
Same. Gotta love that call.
I like the Triceratops call. It doesn't sound dangerous at all and makes you regret underestimating it when it charges you and kills you.
Agathaumas is better than both.
Totally not biased.
Oh, totally. No bias at all.
Poharex of course agathmus may just be a triceratops.
Agathaumas is a hodgepodge of different Ceratopsian parts, including Styracosaurus and Triceratops. On FMM-UV32, however, it is its own thing.
Poharex oh I didnt know you made an agathmus I thought you were talking about the earth agathmus.
Poharex styraciosaurus?
The age old debate continues, but which dinosaur you guys think is better: Triceratops or Chasmosaurus? Be sure to let me know!
Tomorrow, Primal Prey strikes back with vicious force and Sunday I take on a challenge that almost broke me...
Triceratops is better by a mile. At least it looks remotely accurate.
Saurian Target 2nd comment lol
Saurian Target definitely triceratops
Brontoteriy.
I like Triceratops more. And I only like Chasmosaurus for its call
It's hard to decide because the chasmosaurus just looks like a more accurate triceratops.
Ashton The prehistoric man except for the quils
kickbro smasher you right buddy
kickbro smasher ceratopsians likely did not have quills.
But that’s not the point of carnivores...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chasmosaurus
I have a theory. Maybe during the development of Carnivores 2, the developers were going to design the Chasmosaurus after Burian’s artwork and give it it’s own animations, but perhaps due to time or budget they decided the best method would be to copy and paste the Triceratops model, give it some tweaks, and give it new sounds
I always liked the first game better due to having hit sweet spots not just spraying down a Dinosaur with a pistol
Same. Weak zones > blind firing
Indeed. I played C2 when it came out but after a few hours in I returned to C1 due to 2 feeling like little more than a traditional FPS under the faux veil of a hunting game.
They should add the Triceratops in Carnivores Dinosaur Hunter.
This guy knows what's up.
@@SaurianTargetye he does
Take a shot every time a dinosaur headbobs!
You'd be out REAL quick. xD
As soon as I saw the notification I clicked it as fast as I killed a t Rex with a sniper rifle in the dark
:) SENPAISAURUS NOTICED ME!
I'm pretty sure the answer is obvious.
Trike?
Personally, I find myself being neutral to both the Triceratops, and the maligned Chasmosaurus. With the classic Triceratops, I automatically get reminded of the times that the Triceratops and the Tyrant Lizard King may have engaged in combat with each other. With the Chasmosaurus, I don't have that much positive things to say about it. It's essentially the same thing as the Carnivores 1 Triceratops, and it's one of those pointable animals that I don't find to be worth hunting. So, if I had to pick, I'd go with the classic Triceratops.
It would’ve been funny if this video was 1 second long and it was just Saurian saying “triceratops.”
I grew up with my first Carnivores game being Carnivores 2. I remember seeing a Chasmosaurus for the first time at Delphaeus Hills. I wasn't surprised or amazed, just simply was like "oh cool a new dino i've never heard of".
Although I did get to see the Triceratops later, I wasn't really amazed at it either. You could probably see that i'm very neutral in this debate, seeing that i'm ok with either the Triceratops or the Chasmosaurus.
In conclusion, I just wanna hunt dinosaurs.
I have a feeling that the _Chasmosaurus_ doesn't really look like a _Chasmosaurus_ because the square frill wouldn't look good on _Triceratops_ rig, which is designed for a rounder frill.
You make a lot of good points. I shared that initial ''where's the Triceratops?" moment for sure. It defenitely does read a lot more like a Triceratops than a Chasmosaurus, with the shorter frill and large browhorns. I do like the Chasmosaurus though. A lot of the things like the shared animations with trike personally are not a bad thing for me. Makes them feel like closely related animals. Similar, but different species, like bison and cows. That greyish and pale orange is a real hit for me personally. Plus mostly the Herbivores are based on Burian's artwork, the carnivores are more inspired by Jurassic park and other dinosaur renaissance art. The Chasmo sort of works as a transition between the artstyles in my opinion.
i never liked the triceratops from C1
i liked Chasmo more because of the updated model
i think that even Burian would be disappointed in the model, it looks so awkward
i wish the brought it back with a more accurate depiction of Burian's artwork
I like both. But the Chasmosaurus has a awesome roar and I grew up watching Carnivore videos (mainly Carnivores 2) and playing the mobile Carnivores games so I could only hunt the Chasmosaurus.
Since I played Carnivores 2 first, I didn't really mind that much, or really noticed at that age lol, that they had Chasmosaurus instead,however when I eventually played Carnivores 1, I realized the Trike was the original and was unfairly replaced in the sequel. I also remember thinking that the Chasmosaurus didn't even look like a chasmosaurus whatsoever even for being on a dinosaur planet with inaccurate dinosaurs, it was TOO inaccurate XD
There's a fine line to draw with inaccurate dinosaur designs and the Chasmo crossed it. xD
I honestly prefer the chasmosaurus for nostalgic reasons but I do wish that the triceratops got some more respect
I'm not going to lie, I still kind of prefer the Chasmosaurus design, even with knowing the original inspirations and whatnot. While I would have prefered a design closer to a more realistic Chasmosaurus, I just find the colors and frill more original and intimidating. The only thing I can say for the Triceratops is that it certainly looks beefier, especially with how close the back is to the frill, I like that aspect of its design. I don't really have a preference, I just accept the two for what they are and enjoy them. I can almost guarantee that if Triceratops is not added to the IOS versions soon, that it will be one of the first mods in the Steam release to be made.
Ahh! You heathen! Shun! We must shun the nonbeliever!!! Haha
Hey, fair enough! Nice to see someone standing up for the Chasmosaurus. And yes, the Trike definitely has beefiness on its side. xD
At least I admit to the positives of both sides! It also doesn't help that I didn't get to hunt a trike until I downloaded Carnivores Reloaded last year. Maybe the lankyness of the Chasmosaurus helps to differentiate it for me.
The Chasmosaurus was the only dinosaur in the game that I had no knowledge of, prior to playing the game.
@Virtue Waiting
I keep forgetting the Pachycephalosaurus is in the game cause I never even notice it on the menu, I’m too distracted by the carnivores
ngl chasmosaurus is a scardy dino but i like its character design
I have nostalgic for the Chasmosaurus since i used to play the mobile version on my tablet in my childhood but I can see why some people don't like it
Honestly I grew up hunting the Chasmosaurus but playing Carnivores Reloaded I realize that the Triceratops feels more challenging to hunt than the Chasmosaurus (I never played Carnivores 1 but I did play alot of Carnivores 2). But when it comes down to it I still prefer to hunt the Chasmosaurus because its alot more aggressive than the Triceratops and it at least attacks more often than the Trike has. (Seriously I tried like six times already to be killed by a Triceratops but no dice)
I love carnivores and I love this channel. Keep up the excellent work my dude.
Well the first time I ever play Carnivores was on a moble game from a tablet and I saw Chasmosaurus and I thought they accidentally use the wrong name for it then i saw the first ever Carnivores hunting game I was shocked I was wrong there were a triceratops in older game
Did Mr po ho rex release that new chasmosaurus? It is so well done
In real life my favorite ceratopsian is the Chasmosaurus.
That's awesome! It's a very cool dinosaur.
AMAZING SAURIAN ! GG for 2K, TRIKE TEAM !!!
I remember this video has a part which is on twitter of Dinosaur Destroy where Tatem games send him a message and reveal his full name and the name is redacted. I think its in a different video or its my mind with mandela effect.
1:20 Wait, eight? Parasaurolophus, Pachycephalosaurus, Stegosaurus, Allosaurus, Triceratops, Velociraptor, T-Rex… what’s the eighth?
On the topic of this debate, as a kid, I never had any side in this debate - as a kid, I was disappointed the Triceratops didn’t look like the one from Jurassic Park-but, at the time, I didn’t understand the theme or know about Burian’s art style.
Nowadays, though, I have to say I’m firmly in camp Triceratops. Once I heard you break down the theme of ‘these are alien animals that resemble dinosaurs, and coincidentally evolved such that they resembled classic era paleo artwork”, that was it for me. Realizing that really cemented my appreciation for it. I do Carnivores 1 themed hunts on the mobile game often, and whenever I’m selecting dinosaurs, the triceratops is sorely missed. If anyone still pays attention to the mobile game, I hope it gets added in at some point.
Saurian, I have a very unique idea of renaming this chasmosaurus as protriceratops (first three horned face)
I like triceratops the most because of its design it’s so bulky the modern-day ones are just skinny I mean you can just see their bones through
there skin
Saurian Target, what's your favorite dinosaur of all time? Mine are the Raptor species and the Yutyranus
Allosaurus is my favorite dinosaur. :)
I remember when I was a kid, I saw the Carnivores app in the Android App Store, I remember playing it till night and specifically disappointed for the Chasmosaurus because I was bias of Triceratops was my favorite. At that time, I remember thinking to myself, “Chasmosaurus looks like this? Can’t they just rename or recolour it?”
[Chimes in very late to this argument] Personally, I feel the Triceratops is better //for what Carnivores was//. When the first Carnivores was released, dinosaurs weren't widely known (by the general public), so there was this still idea that dinosaurs were these huge, lumbering titans, these perceptions further enhanced by the Jurassic Park films. The Triceratops very much reflected what the public wanted and expected from dinosaurs at the time, and I loved how huge and beefy it was.
While I don't believe it should have been removed in Carnivores 2, I kinda wouldn't have had a problem if it was just 'updated' for Carnivores 2, along with the other dinosaurs. I was disappointed that a lot of dinosaurs made a comeback for Carnivores 2, even the T-rex. I mean, I'd hunted it before so yeah... not really that special to kill it again. An update / revamp / replacement for every dinosaur was in order, and it's a shame that only a select few dinosaurs got that treatment.
This is why I feel the Chasmosaurus is a good dinosaur for the mobile release, as Ceratopsians are no longer perceived as those lumbering bus-sized behemoths, some are well known and accepted to be smaller and quicker, yet to make up for its smaller size the Chasmosaurus does boast a lovely array of horns. That being said though, I still see no reason for it to have been renamed. Their Ankylosaurus could have very easily been rehashed as a Euoplocephalus, and yet only the Trike got this treatment... weird.
So yeah, to conclude, perceptions change and change isn't bad, but the Triceraptops lifespan was unreasonably cut short. Replacing it wouldn't have been a problem if //every// dinosaur was replaced AND both it and the Chasmo were included in the mobile port, just like the Pachycephalosaurus and Ankylosaurus were both included, despite the former being replaced by the latter.
No worries, there's never a "late to this argument" here! I still get chewed out in the comments of videos I made a year ago. xD
Very good points! I totally agree on the redundancy of returning dinosaurs (it just makes Carnivores 2 feel even more like an expansion pack), but I never even considered that the Chasmosaurus fit the mobile port as a representation of the public's newer perception of dinosaurs (specifically ceratopsians). Great thoughts!
when there's an update of Carnivores Dinosaur Hunter Tatem will add Triceratops so we can hunt both Triceratops and Chasmosaurus
I like triceratops more
1:44 looks like a friend appeared
Chasmosaurus looks like a more realistic triceratops
Hey I have an idea! Maybe Tatem can use the Triceratops in the survival hunts. That would be very good as we could see the Triceratops in another game adaptation, though as a minor cameo.
Hey is my profile pic a Utahtaptor or a hamster thing?
You know sense the creature At 7:39 that looks like chasmosaurus but mojoceratops I'm the chamosaurus a juvenile triceratops
maybe they didnt like the idea of re-releasing a potato with horns
I’m all for authenticity, the chasmosaurus depicted in the sequel doesn’t look like the illustrations of Burian. BUT that doesn’t make them any worse than the Triceratops for merely deviating.
I have to say that The Triceratops is 100% the better animal but... the time i spent playing Carnivores 2 (it was one of the first games i ever played, and i have over 300 hours on it) makes me love the Chasmpsaurus even tho is flawed and uninspired 😅
wait ankylosaurus is dangerous? cause in carnivores dinosaur hunter it says its not
dangerous
1,00000,0000% biased on this. I love both of them soo much!
Thay should update the chasmasaur to have a unique animaition and look and when is the DARN DILO GONNA BE ADDED!
Probably never, I'm afraid...
I Say To You In All Honesty...
CHASPASAURUS!!! that was a pun by the way
At first I thought Chasmosaur was a Triceratops but updated
oh, it's either A, Triceratops and the other Trike or B, Chasmosaurus. I got it, I got it, it's C, the answer is C, The triceratops and the chasmosaurus. I think they will rename the ceratopsian from Chasmosaurus to the accurate Triceratops.
Carnivores really did have some top of the line AI for its time, all of the ceratopsin debate aside.
Do a TRex vs the yeti plz.
I would vote for the triceratops
10:47 Did the triceratops just eat rocks...? 0-0
Oh wait, nvm that's dirt. Sorry for mistaking the dirt for rocks =(
Whoa, the Dimorphodon and Archaeopteryx look just like Zdenek Burian's art. For the ceratopsian debate, Triceratops is a more iconic and larger and advanced dinosaur. But of course it is nice to see other species be brought to the series, including some of the previous ancestors like Chasmosaurus. The primary thing I am disappointed with Triceratops is it's inaccurate design.
The Triceratops is accurate to Mr. Burian's paleoart. Since this is what the game set out to do in the first place, that's good enough for me.
Right. I was just referring to a more accurate version oh what it really was like, although back then no one really knew it's true built.
Poharex meh I don't like the design either though more because I just don't like the proportions looks like a dang pig basically if the artwork dinosaur gained weight.
I never would have knew about the casmasaurus if it wasn't for carnivores
I like casmasaurus being in the game because it bring attention to the species and also it's model even if not based off that's guys art is better
That's really cool! I'm glad to hear it brought awareness to the dinosaur.
The tissue part killed me. And I don't know why
the debate is real my friends
Duel of fates
What’s the difference? They’re both Ceratopsians, herbivorous dinosaurs, and they both lived in the Late Cretaceous period.
Hey saurian could you answer this theory
Why dinosaurs dont fight
In the game
When I was younger and playing carnivores I mistook the chasmosaurus for the triceratops.
this is truly and complicted relationship
they should have said the chasmos as subspecies of triceratops
They should give the chasmosaurus model the name triceratops
Honestly, I liked the body build, call, and color scheme of Chasmosaurus(basically re-creating a "more realistic Triceratops"), but I also prefer the idea of a well-known dinosaur in the game, so I'm tied
I agree
I like the Chasmosaurus, but I don’t get why they replaced the Triceratops with the Chasmosaurus.
saurian target can u do a mod showcase of carnivores modern age the one with today animals please all your vids are so great your. my favorite youtuber by far I didnt get the point of carnivores dinosaur hunter until I started watching your channel plus I was the 997 sub
I will after Carnivores Migration. :)
no offence but my opinion is like you woke up and chose violence, not giving any chance to the chasmosaurus
I did. I had an agenda and I made it known
can you make how to download carnivores 2 2018
Yes!
Think you
Triceratops is better by a landslide
A true American more like a pryloclastic flow slide which by the way can reach up to speeds of 1,000 miles an hour.
I wish we didn't have to choose. Who said we can only have one Ceratopsian?
No need to choose! Like ‘em both!
mojo jojo
Was waiting for that comment!
To download ice age its easy but i strugle with downloading The 2nd version Much problems: And Orginal Carnivores
when I was 6 i entered carn. 2 and saw chasmo and thought : hey trike is cool then used binoculars and saw chasmo, i was dissapointed cause I knew what a chasmo was and that wasnt a chasmo and I am only 13
Saurain target you are a gamingbever fan I know you are or someone faked you but you are a great youtuber and you make carnivores videos my favorite game you one of the best I personly beleive you should have 999999999999999999999999999 subs and do more carnivors 1 things and maybe do livestreams
I like to watch him every now and then. :)
I want triceratops is going into mobile and the model for the casmasaurs model that pohorex made is so awesome I really wish that is going to be the model for th 2 game and mobile your mod skins and everything look great to great job for 2 k subs and great job for pohorex for the "real"casmasaurus model=) great job for 2k I am glad to see the community grow to the more subs the more vids
Saurian target has a big beef with chasmosaurs its kinda annoying
I haven’t talked about the Chasmosaurus in years 😂
Tatem should add Triceratops on Carnivores Dinosaur Hunter
I herd chasmosaurs had a rectangular frill
Just rename the Chasmosaurus to Triceratops. That way, we have a modern Triceratops model, great dinosaur call, and the Triceratops still remains.
Triceratops wins because it has a tail wag in its walk animation.
I was sad when I saw that my baby boy the triceratops wasn't in this game
In my opinion both of them are great, but I like Triceratops more
In dinosaurs hunter ankylosaurs is not attacking
When I was a little kid I thought the chasmosaurus was a triceratops...
Tf Tatem Games. What was your deal back then. So disrespectful to his work. But in my opinion I love the Chasmosaurus calls too.
I would say triceratops but i grow with chasmo up and i love chasmo
I grew up with Carnivores_DH so chasmosaurus is my fav.
i like chasmo more JUST because it has more detail.
10:06 10:09 also a absent favorite, and a cowardly anky
im just dying waiting for saurian target new video
if it wasn't because the Trike looks like an obese 3 horned moschops... I would choose the Trike over the Chasmosaurus
Him says Imposter : Me : *AMOGUSJ