It was considered. My unseemly for a young woman to live with a man whose wife had died. So the dead woman's sister married her brother in law. Not incest not strange. My great great grandmother.
The British Parliament struggled with this issue for years. There's a line in Iolanthe by Gilbert and Sullivan--"He shall prick that annual blister/Marriage with deceased wife's sister" Finally the passed a law allowing it, the Deceased Wife's Sister Act in 1907.
Marriage between first cousins was and is widespread, and generally not considered nor perceived as incestuous. The idea that it is was mostly born in the USA whence it spread to other anglo-saxon countries. And besides he didn't really know the issues with inbreeding as genetics were yet to be invented. It was known that inbreeding could cause issues, if only from observing domesticated animals, but the risk when marrying a first cousin is in fact very low, contrarily to what most people believe. It's similar to having a child when one of the parents is above 40, to give an example. And nobody call people who have children after 40 irresponsible. For inbreeding to really cause problems it needs either to be incest between much closer relatives (siblings, for instance) or to be repeated generation after generation, resulting in first cousins who are much more closely related genetically than first cousins normally are. This latter situation mostly happens in two cases : very small and isolated communities and some historical royal families. The video in fact mentions that there had been several first cousin marriages in Darwin's family. So, that could be the problem. On the other hand, two or three children dying in the 19th century is absolutely unsurprising, so it can't be taken as an evidence that there was a genetic issue at play. Besides, there's no mention of what genetic issue the children would have had. Having parents who are close relative doesn't make you weaker, or sickly, or prone to disease. It only gives you a higher risk of receiving from both parents the same defective gene they might have both inherited from their common grandparent (for first cousins). So, it will manifest itself in a specific way, like the hemophilia also mentioned in this video.Or the jaw issue of the Habsbourg. Not in dying young from various reasons.
@@olivierdastein2604 When I heard the narrator say that 3 of the 10 kids died, I figured that was pretty much par for the course in those times. (which would have been close to 200 years ago) Just out of curiosity, I looked up which states is 1st cousin marriage legal. It turns out 18 states, mostly located in the eastern part of the country. It makes me wonder about the other 32 & what are the reasons that those specific 18 are legal ? It would be interesting to know the history behind that.
This whole thing is stupid. Before people knew better first cousins married all the time. The Royal families of Europe were all related. That's why so many were crazy or had hemophilia. None of this is scandal. Of course I didn't get past King Tut because I could not listen anymore.
You forgot to mention that family in Austria where the father built a living quarter under his house where he raped his own daughter for years and had 5 children by him. Josef Fritzl
YES!! And how he set it up a time or 2 to make it look like his daughter had these babies and dropped them on her parents doorstep, and mom just never questioned a thing 🤦♀️
Oh dear oh dear, TRY to match up the pictures with the narrative. Its so confusing and irritating to have a full ashtray pop up, for example, when recounting how someone one was “smoked to death “ in mid 16thC. There were no cigarettes in that era, and that’s NOT how you were smoked to death. That’s ONE error. I WANT to like this channel, I really do. I can’t because you make bad editing “choices” - which are just lazy, sloppy editing. Come on, you can do better! You obviously have access to sources. Use them.
It’s possible these are film students in training. Learning through their mistakes. If it is I understand. It is a good learning tool, but if this is just some joker who is just plain bad at film making.
You would do well to research your cases properly. Haemophilia does not require both parents to have a faulty gene nor is it prevalent because of incestuous relationships. Also, the tale of Fred and Rosemary West was grossly exaggerated. Admittedly they were a pair of sadistic and perverted individuals but they did not 'terrorize' England.
No. Habsburg. Unless some English idiot decided that they would change the correct spelling, as has often been the case with immigrants. My great-great grandparents had their surnames changed by an illiterate from, respectively, Treitz to Trites and Lutz to Lutes. Both stupid outcomes.
Adding to the growing list of inaccuracies, mistakes, and just plain poor research, Rasputin was not mythical he was a mystic. But he did actually exist.
My mom married brothers. The first one died in Korea. As result, my sister and I are half sisters as well as half cousins. I just consider her my sister. I don't see the problem. She had never met him prior to his brother's funeral.
This is the crappiest illustrations of a story that I have ever seen. I mean really it is SO BAD it's shocking! Geez, spend a little time on finding appropriate pictures to illustrate with instead of just whatever whatever that doesn't even make sense with the story that you are trying to tell.
Incest is nowadays mostly defined by blood relationship, but historically it often included relatives by marriage. What is defined and perceived as incest is essentially cultural (with some exception like parents/children and siblings, that's pretty universal). Maybe people at the time were just thinking that it was going against the laws of god, but they might very well have been genuinely shocked because having been raised up to think this way, they saw a sister in law as a family member and envisioning having sex with her unthinkable and disgusting. Look nowadays : marriage with a first cousin is perceived in some countries not just as a bad idea, or just defined arbitrarily as incest : people there do feel that it's incest and have reactions of disgust at the thought. While the rest of the world sees it as perfectly normal and not the slightest bit disturbing. The difference is culture. Basically people feel about issues the way they've been raised to feel. So, it's perfectly possible that when marrying your sister in law was classified as incest, people were genuinely shocked by it and perceived little difference with marrying an actual blood relative. Note that at the contrary, ancient Jews made *mandatory* to marry your sister in law if her husband (your brother) had died without having children. Your duty was, sort of, to give him a descendance.
I don't think they deliberately intended to make some of the incongruous images we saw - like seeing Ferdinand the Bull when talking about Ferdinand a Spanish royal but having the cartoon show up was hilarious! There were just SO MANY ERRORS both by text and visual in particular! The quality of this video was terribly abysmal. Was someone putting this together at 3am when they should have been asleep?
A lot of these visuals have nothing to do with the subject matter. Marrying his sister in law is not incest. Good grief, malaria is not caused by inbreeding.
16:45 Tut's autopsy did not show he had front lobal epilepsy. His father, Akhenaten, probably did. It manifests with religious hallucinations. Tut was a cripple with a club foot and died from an infection when he broke his leg. I doubt he broke his leg in battle. More likely he fell down.
In many cultures years ago, including Jewish, a man married his sister in law to "look after her". He was taking his brothers place and ensuring his brothers family did not go hungry. If he had a family with his wife/sister in law, the child took on his wife's first husbands name. Native Americans also marry their brothers widow.
1st story: at that time, the church was in charge of things matrimonial. Nils needed to get a dispensation from the church, he skipped that step, hence the furor. Marrying Lucy's sister made her his siter, in the eyes of Christians at the time. Henry VIII had to get a dispensationfrom the Pope for his first and second wives. Katherine because she been married to his late brother [although she and her ladies said it was not consummated], Anne because he'd already slept with her sister. The consummation made Anne in the same category as Katherine per the church.
People who believe that marrying your wife's sister isn't direct incest forget that it was EXTREMELY frowned upon and illegal at the time, and WAS considered incest. That's literally what Hamlet is about to an extent, because he's upset that his father committed incest after his mother died. It was historically considered incest, even if it isn't the modern definition of what incest means today.
Marrying the next of kin to a dead marriage mate was a requirement of the Mosiac law. It seems that the Catholic Church in the middle ages didn't know the Bible. They should have known about the story of Ruth. The Church also failed to point out this example to Henry VIII.
Inaccuracy of information, a criminal offence in my book! Strange mish mash of images, some having no relevance at all. Constant mispronunciation which is confusing to the listener and annoying in equal measure. Is this really the best you can do, with all the resources you have at your disposal? Just a quick btw....Henry V111th married his dead brothers wife Catherine of Aragon, you could hardly hold this up as the most successful marriage in history, but it certainly was not incest!
It's obvious that Queen Victoria is related to George iii because she has inherited her distinctive features her big protruding eyes, her receding chin, and her her fair skin from her father's side.
It’s not incest to marry your dead wife’s sister. That’s was the law but, a good lawyer could’ve fought that. He didn’t even have any children from his first wife?
Not, he couldn't have fought that, as it was unambiguously the law. And incest is whatever is defined as incest by your society and you have learned to perceive in this way. You live in the USA? Sex with your first cousin is definitely incest, and marrying her obviously forbidden. But it's neither forbidden by law nor perceived as incest by people in most of the rest of the world; including for instance in most of western Europe. So, is sex/marriage with your cousin incest or not? And if it's forbidden in your state, can a good lawyer fight it? How? By pointing to the fact that it's not forbidden in most of the rest of the world? Not a chance that it will work. Similarly in this case, even if you were totally convinced that it's not incest, that wouldn't prevail in court. Besides, you wouldn't think that because you would have been raised in that society and so for you incest would obviously include in-laws. Everybody would know that, and probably everybody, including you, would be totally shocked by such an inappropriate relationship
The poor guy that married his dead wife's sister was done wrong, for sure. There was nothing immoral about what he did and there was no "inbreeding" since he had no genetic connection to his second wife. it sounds to me like this was a simple matter of some kind of religious fervor that sought to meet out the most heinous punishment on someone. What a horrible thing!!
Marrying the sister of a deceased wife was common practice in the settling of America. There would probably be children with no mother to care for them and a single aunt would be familiar. Dad's needed to work.
Watch the Consequences of Marrying your cousin. It is on RUclips.( I think it was a Channel 4 documentary) It is about Indian/Pakistani couples who have had disabled children. Bradford has a high Pakistani community and it has a very high incidence of disabled children.
I question how these people hide out( as in the Sexton case)and the length of time passed before discovery? These children and young adults that have survived would have such great psychological problems. How very maddening these predators exist. I feel for any and all victims.
My siblings and I grew up in that kind of household. My 2 eldest sisters had a baby each by our father. Come to find out years later, they weren’t his biological daughters, but still, he raised them as such. Our mother participated in it. She would come get them and take them to him as well as participate in the act. Our parents took the babies and our mother raised them as hers. They were each in their teens when they found out my mother was not their mother. There’s a whole lot more to the story, but I tried my best to summarize. How our parents got away with it all is because, we always lived out in the country. The oldest of the 2, was killed by our mother and our dad buried her out in the barn. My other sister, was scared she was pregnant again and ran away, I also left home at 16, got a job and took care of myself. All my brothers ran away by the age of 14, they would get in trouble with the law and get sent back or get thrown in jail. We all told people that we should’ve been able to trust and help us, but no one did.
@ I’m so sorry your life and family were so bad. I have a close friend who is an incest survivor and I’ve seen her go through very traumatic times during her life due to this. She, like you, left home at 16 and fended for herself.I hope you have had counselling and have been able to look forward not backward. Sad to say but you are not alone. 😔
Inbreeding in thoroughbred racehorses can often be very positive. Many champions have been produced who are inbred to an illustrious, often more than one ancestor that is duplicated if not triplicated or more in its pedigree... So it's not always a disadvantage to be 'inbred'...
Incest is pretty shocking! But, in some isolated communities, like,not to generalize, it can and does happen, even in the U.S.A. like the Ozarks or someplace. Whether it is close incest or generations of cousins in a closed community doing it, it is both psychologically for the participants and bad for whatever children are produced by it. There should be laws against and help rendered to the victims.
@@marciaturkiewicz7255 No. Habsburg. Unless some English idiot decided that they would change the correct spelling, as has often been the case with immigrants. My great-great grandparents had their surnames changed by an illiterate from, respectively, Treitz to Trites and Lutz to Lutes.
Here comes Queen Victoria. I won't be at all surprised to see a pic of Josephine Baker in this one. (Baker's genes would have been the best in that batch!)
If you know what Satanism is, like I do, you know that Eddie Lee Saxton was not one. He was Satan worshipper which is completely different than Satanism. I wish people knwe this. Satanism has strict tenents, that condemns violence and wrong-doing.
Satan is the ruler of this wicked system we are living in, so nothing like this should surprise us. His time is coming to an end, we are now living in the "Last Days" of Satan's rule.
I know the bible fairly well from my childhood and I don't recall any references to incest. I do know there's no forbidding of child sexual abuse or rape in the 10 commandments: wonder which gender wrote them?
Hey, if you want to make videos you need to do them right. You forgot to throw in the Colloseum, a picture of Marilyn Monroe, a recipe for bear meat and a link to the death of Sid Viscous. Why be lazy?
Just a word, pls use visual pictures that are as close to what the story you're tell your subs. I mean, really?! I get your 'low slanted go' at Prime Minister Bejamin Netanyahu and find it in very poor taste. Future wise why not try to find the visual elements you truly need, and they aren't of a personal or political nature. We're all different in what we hold in value and belief. It not one soap box fits all.
I’m looking for someone who gave me a reply of a list of things wrong with the nativity scene this he meant story. I found it interesting but can’t find it anymore. If it’s you or you know who that is please send me that reply again
💙 Don’t miss out! Subscribe for quick video summaries! - vintage-tv.beehiiv.com/
I agree. That happens sometimes , but they are not blood related
Exactly! It makes no sense that they would call it "incest"! After all, he wasn't marrying HIS SISTER!!! 🙄🙄🙄
@@tobascoheat6582 but it's still NASTY 🤣🤣😎
That one woman looks like Michelle obama
@christineweaver3090 put your glasses on Please. 🤣🤣🤣
It may have been a law, but marrying your deceased wife’s sister is not incest.
Its still kinda outthere...
@@spiritthingwagreed 😩
Totally agree. My friend had had two sons to brothers?
True
Yiyi. King Charles II , was autopsy with a tiny atrophied testicle. Not really breeding material
Marrying your dead ife's sister isn't incest. It's bad taste, at the very least.
It was considered. My unseemly for a young woman to live with a man whose wife had died. So the dead woman's sister married her brother in law. Not incest not strange. My great great grandmother.
The British Parliament struggled with this issue for years. There's a line in Iolanthe by Gilbert and Sullivan--"He shall prick that annual blister/Marriage with deceased wife's sister" Finally the passed a law allowing it, the Deceased Wife's Sister Act in 1907.
Tradition in some cultures.
I have 2 uncles married the same lady then one went and married her again lol
Reminds me of bidens son having a fling with his dad's brother bo's wife.
The mispronunciation of the narrative and the juxtaposition of unrelated clips made this one an editorial FAIL
Thank you.
Thanks I'm 24 seconds in. I won't watch
Thank you.
and the subtitles? OMG
Yeah, I was shocked when The picture of BB Netanyahu popped out for no rhyme or reason.
What always amazed me was Darwin, he knew the issues with inbreeding then marries his cousin
Marriage between first cousins was and is widespread, and generally not considered nor perceived as incestuous. The idea that it is was mostly born in the USA whence it spread to other anglo-saxon countries. And besides he didn't really know the issues with inbreeding as genetics were yet to be invented. It was known that inbreeding could cause issues, if only from observing domesticated animals, but the risk when marrying a first cousin is in fact very low, contrarily to what most people believe. It's similar to having a child when one of the parents is above 40, to give an example. And nobody call people who have children after 40 irresponsible.
For inbreeding to really cause problems it needs either to be incest between much closer relatives (siblings, for instance) or to be repeated generation after generation, resulting in first cousins who are much more closely related genetically than first cousins normally are. This latter situation mostly happens in two cases : very small and isolated communities and some historical royal families. The video in fact mentions that there had been several first cousin marriages in Darwin's family. So, that could be the problem. On the other hand, two or three children dying in the 19th century is absolutely unsurprising, so it can't be taken as an evidence that there was a genetic issue at play. Besides, there's no mention of what genetic issue the children would have had. Having parents who are close relative doesn't make you weaker, or sickly, or prone to disease. It only gives you a higher risk of receiving from both parents the same defective gene they might have both inherited from their common grandparent (for first cousins). So, it will manifest itself in a specific way, like the hemophilia also mentioned in this video.Or the jaw issue of the Habsbourg. Not in dying young from various reasons.
@@olivierdastein2604 When I heard the narrator say that 3 of the 10 kids died, I figured that was pretty much par for the course in those times. (which would have been close to 200 years ago) Just out of curiosity, I looked up which states is 1st cousin marriage legal. It turns out 18 states, mostly located in the eastern part of the country. It makes me wonder about the other 32 & what are the reasons that those specific 18 are legal ? It would be interesting to know the history behind that.
@@peggypeggy4137It's legal to marry one's cousin in 26 States of the USA.
⁰
Not to be funny but ppl do still marry their first cousins today.
Marry a wife's sister not incest if not linked geneticly.
This whole thing is stupid. Before people knew better first cousins married all the time. The Royal families of Europe were all related. That's why so many were crazy or had hemophilia. None of this is scandal. Of course I didn't get past King Tut because I could not listen anymore.
Oh this video............??? It's impossible to watch anymore of this video. Way too many mistakes.
YEAH. A TOTALLY AMATEUR PRODUCTION.
That's not a mistake!
Right. I wanted to see a depiction of Ferdinand but now I don’t know who is pictured. Disgusting material.
Why are you showing drawings of British India while talking about Connecticut?
A I .
The whole thing is a laughable mess
@@andreabenfell5580stupid ! A.I. Stupid !
Who in the world spliced/edited this video ? ITS CRAZY !....🤷..🥴
Why, what's wrong with it? It's meant too be older, hence the effects.
@@spiritthingw your an uneducated comentator
It’s A.I.
@@spiritthingwEdward Cullen? Lol!
At least it’s consistent by being inconsistent!
You forgot to mention that family in Austria where the father built a living quarter under his house where he raped his own daughter for years and had 5 children by him. Josef Fritzl
I was just wondering why they didn’t mention that as well!
YES!! And how he set it up a time or 2 to make it look like his daughter had these babies and dropped them on her parents doorstep, and mom just never questioned a thing 🤦♀️
Yes, that case really creeps me out. The poor daughter, and her poor kids living in that sm underground room.
SHE HAD 7 KIDS WITH HER FATHER, 1 BABY BOY DIED AND HE BURNED HIM IN THE FURNACE...
Oh dear oh dear, TRY to match up the pictures with the narrative. Its so confusing and irritating to have a full ashtray pop up, for example, when recounting how someone one was “smoked to death “ in mid 16thC. There were no cigarettes in that era, and that’s NOT how you were smoked to death. That’s ONE error. I WANT to like this channel, I really do. I can’t because you make bad editing “choices” - which are just lazy, sloppy editing. Come on, you can do better! You obviously have access to sources. Use them.
Had to stop watching because of the poor editing and inaccuracy of information. Terrible video
It’s possible these are film students in training. Learning through their mistakes. If it is I understand. It is a good learning tool, but if this is just some joker who is just plain bad at film making.
Love you too❤
Oops sorry , this is the wrong site . That was for my granddaughter😊
@@cherihardesty9333I'll take it! Love you too.
You would do well to research your cases properly. Haemophilia does not require both parents to have a faulty gene nor is it prevalent because of incestuous relationships. Also, the tale of Fred and Rosemary West was grossly exaggerated. Admittedly they were a pair of sadistic and perverted individuals but they did not 'terrorize' England.
Historical tidbit: Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln were born on the same day in 1809. In small towns it is hard to not marry your cousin.
A lot of these visuals have nothing to do with the subject matter.
Hapsburg, not Hamsburg!
No. Habsburg. Unless some English idiot decided that they would change the correct spelling, as has often been the case with immigrants. My great-great grandparents had their surnames changed by an illiterate from, respectively, Treitz to Trites and Lutz to Lutes. Both stupid outcomes.
Exited at 1:17; AI narration and crawl were rubbish.
Tutaka Moon, Tuton Common, Took in Common, Tooton Common. Made me laugh so much, I couldnt watch anymore😂
The whole thing was hilarious, I'm afraid.
Adding to the growing list of inaccuracies, mistakes, and just plain poor research, Rasputin was not mythical he was a mystic. But he did actually exist.
The Bible says if your brother dies and you’re not married you should marry his widow and raise his children as his own, to honor your brother. 😊
When your sibling snuffs it, it's perfectly okay to marry the widow/widower. Not in the best of taste, but certainly not incest.
To myself that could be interpreted as a responsible kindness.
My mom married brothers. The first one died in Korea. As result, my sister and I are half sisters as well as half cousins. I just consider her my sister. I don't see the problem. She had never met him prior to his brother's funeral.
The Whitakers
This is the crappiest illustrations of a story that I have ever seen. I mean really it is SO BAD it's shocking! Geez, spend a little time on finding appropriate pictures to illustrate with instead of just whatever whatever that doesn't even make sense with the story that you are trying to tell.
It's another world these people live in, a very disturbing one.
How is it incest when a man who falls in love with his sister in law?
And back then, more often than not, they didn’t marry for love, a lot of times, it was out of necessity.
Incest is nowadays mostly defined by blood relationship, but historically it often included relatives by marriage. What is defined and perceived as incest is essentially cultural (with some exception like parents/children and siblings, that's pretty universal). Maybe people at the time were just thinking that it was going against the laws of god, but they might very well have been genuinely shocked because having been raised up to think this way, they saw a sister in law as a family member and envisioning having sex with her unthinkable and disgusting. Look nowadays : marriage with a first cousin is perceived in some countries not just as a bad idea, or just defined arbitrarily as incest : people there do feel that it's incest and have reactions of disgust at the thought. While the rest of the world sees it as perfectly normal and not the slightest bit disturbing. The difference is culture. Basically people feel about issues the way they've been raised to feel. So, it's perfectly possible that when marrying your sister in law was classified as incest, people were genuinely shocked by it and perceived little difference with marrying an actual blood relative. Note that at the contrary, ancient Jews made *mandatory* to marry your sister in law if her husband (your brother) had died without having children. Your duty was, sort of, to give him a descendance.
I don't think they deliberately intended to make some of the incongruous images we saw - like seeing Ferdinand the Bull when talking about Ferdinand a Spanish royal but having the cartoon show up was hilarious! There were just SO MANY ERRORS both by text and visual in particular! The quality of this video was terribly abysmal. Was someone putting this together at 3am when they should have been asleep?
I rather think that whole video was generated by an AI on the basis of the text.
Good grief, malaria is not caused by inbreeding.
Darwin’s an idiot. An evolutionist and marries his first cousin.
No shit! Smart man...uh, not...
Exactly
Well if it was good enough for the Royals .........
Yet to this day, so many people believe in his evolution theory 🤦♀️
Marrying your cousin is allowed
Marrying his sister in law is not incest.
A lot of these visuals have nothing to do with the subject matter. Marrying his sister in law is not incest. Good grief, malaria is not caused by inbreeding.
I liked info but pictures were insane 🤬🤬
A lot of the "info" is inaccurate and very poorly researched
Why are you including photos of other places and people that have other separate issues and crimes such as jeffery dahmers victims are cartoons ?
But malaria is not genetic.
The subtitles are randomly written. They need someone to correct them.
Uh hello, marrying your dead wife's sister is NOT incest!
Can you show the pictures that are supposed to go with the commentary?
Or at least don’t mix old and modern photos. It’s aggravating!
16:45 Tut's autopsy did not show he had front lobal epilepsy. His father, Akhenaten, probably did. It manifests with religious hallucinations. Tut was a cripple with a club foot and died from an infection when he broke his leg. I doubt he broke his leg in battle. More likely he fell down.
Shocking editing - I can’t finish this.
Not sure which I hate more, AI narration or idiotically incorrect AI captions! This video sucks!
🎶it's the end of the world as we know it...🎶 nothing will ever be the same thanks to tech.
I'm surprised you didn't mention Josef Fritzl.
Ever noticed how many killers are Germanic ? Dahmer , List , Fritzl and more …
@@alicesamuels3937yes, I thought the same thing 🤨
Apart from the audio being confusing AI? the video is worse 😞
Hey. Using film photos of people absolutely not the narrative tells. Fie
In many cultures years ago, including Jewish, a man married his sister in law to "look after her". He was taking his brothers place and ensuring his brothers family did not go hungry. If he had a family with his wife/sister in law, the child took on his wife's first husbands name. Native Americans also marry their brothers widow.
1st story: at that time, the church was in charge of things matrimonial. Nils needed to get a dispensation from the church, he skipped that step, hence the furor. Marrying Lucy's sister made her his siter, in the eyes of Christians at the time. Henry VIII had to get a dispensationfrom the Pope for his first and second wives. Katherine because she been married to his late brother [although she and her ladies said it was not consummated], Anne because he'd already slept with her sister. The consummation made Anne in the same category as Katherine per the church.
People who believe that marrying your wife's sister isn't direct incest forget that it was EXTREMELY frowned upon and illegal at the time, and WAS considered incest. That's literally what Hamlet is about to an extent, because he's upset that his father committed incest after his mother died. It was historically considered incest, even if it isn't the modern definition of what incest means today.
Showing Jeffrey Dahmer's victims! What!? That doesn't have a thing to do with this subject except it's evil.
When showing Wesson's victims they actually showed pictures of Jeffrey Dahmer's victims?? Sensationalism is getting ridiculous in these videos!
The correct term is Hapsburg jaw, not Hamsburg jaw.
There are other booboos and odd matchings of photos to text/narration.
Marrying the next of kin to a dead marriage mate was a requirement of the Mosiac law. It seems that the Catholic Church in the middle ages didn't know the Bible. They should have known about the story of Ruth. The Church also failed to point out this example to Henry VIII.
Most of photos don't have anything to do with what your talking about.With that don't include them.
Inaccuracy of information, a criminal offence in my book! Strange mish mash of images, some having no relevance at all. Constant mispronunciation which is confusing to the listener and annoying in equal measure. Is this really the best you can do, with all the resources you have at your disposal? Just a quick btw....Henry V111th married his dead brothers wife Catherine of Aragon, you could hardly hold this up as the most successful marriage in history, but it certainly was not incest!
My Elementary school principal married her deceased sister’s husband and adopted her nieces and nephews.😊
@@oldwoman5942 😮 wow in this day it’s odd
It's obvious that Queen Victoria is related to George iii because she has inherited her distinctive features her big protruding eyes, her receding chin, and her her fair skin from her father's side.
It’s not incest to marry your dead wife’s sister. That’s was the law but, a good lawyer could’ve fought that. He didn’t even have any children from his first wife?
Not, he couldn't have fought that, as it was unambiguously the law. And incest is whatever is defined as incest by your society and you have learned to perceive in this way. You live in the USA? Sex with your first cousin is definitely incest, and marrying her obviously forbidden. But it's neither forbidden by law nor perceived as incest by people in most of the rest of the world; including for instance in most of western Europe. So, is sex/marriage with your cousin incest or not? And if it's forbidden in your state, can a good lawyer fight it? How? By pointing to the fact that it's not forbidden in most of the rest of the world? Not a chance that it will work. Similarly in this case, even if you were totally convinced that it's not incest, that wouldn't prevail in court. Besides, you wouldn't think that because you would have been raised in that society and so for you incest would obviously include in-laws. Everybody would know that, and probably everybody, including you, would be totally shocked by such an inappropriate relationship
The poor guy that married his dead wife's sister was done wrong, for sure. There was nothing immoral about what he did and there was no "inbreeding" since he had no genetic connection to his second wife. it sounds to me like this was a simple matter of some kind of religious fervor that sought to meet out the most heinous punishment on someone. What a horrible thing!!
Marrying the sister of a deceased wife was common practice in the settling of America. There would probably be children with no mother to care for them and a single aunt would be familiar. Dad's needed to work.
Watch the Consequences of Marrying your cousin. It is on RUclips.( I think it was a Channel 4 documentary) It is about Indian/Pakistani couples who have had disabled children. Bradford has a high Pakistani community and it has a very high incidence of disabled children.
I question how these people hide out( as in the Sexton case)and the length of time passed before discovery? These children and young adults that have survived would have such great psychological problems. How very maddening these predators exist. I feel for any and all victims.
My siblings and I grew up in that kind of household. My 2 eldest sisters had a baby each by our father. Come to find out years later, they weren’t his biological daughters, but still, he raised them as such. Our mother participated in it. She would come get them and take them to him as well as participate in the act.
Our parents took the babies and our mother raised them as hers. They were each in their teens when they found out my mother was not their mother. There’s a whole lot more to the story, but I tried my best to summarize. How our parents got away with it all is because, we always lived out in the country. The oldest of the 2, was killed by our mother and our dad buried her out in the barn. My other sister, was scared she was pregnant again and ran away, I also left home at 16, got a job and took care of myself. All my brothers ran away by the age of 14, they would get in trouble with the law and get sent back or get thrown in jail.
We all told people that we should’ve been able to trust and help us, but no one did.
@ I’m so sorry your life and family were so bad. I have a close friend who is an incest survivor and I’ve seen her go through very traumatic times during her life due to this. She, like you, left home at 16 and fended for herself.I hope you have had counselling and have been able to look forward not backward. Sad to say but you are not alone. 😔
I always thought that it's kinda ironic that Darwin the pioneer of The thought of evolution and natural selection was married to his 1st cousin 🤔 😂😂😂
Rasputin wasn’t “mythical.” I think you meant “mystical.”
Did you forget to turn the dust and scratch filter off?
Indians and Pakistani marry their first cousins. And yes the kids can inherit sons illnesses from their parents
Inbreeding in thoroughbred racehorses can often be very positive. Many champions have been produced who are inbred to an illustrious, often more than one ancestor that is duplicated if not triplicated or more in its pedigree... So it's not always a disadvantage to be 'inbred'...
Incest is pretty shocking! But, in some isolated communities, like,not to generalize, it can and does happen, even in the U.S.A. like the Ozarks or someplace. Whether it is close incest or generations of cousins in a closed community doing it, it is both psychologically for the participants and bad for whatever children are produced by it.
There should be laws against and help rendered to the victims.
It's HABSBURG ... Not Hamsburg!
Hapsberg
@@marciaturkiewicz7255 No. Habsburg. Unless some English idiot decided that they would change the correct spelling, as has often been the case with immigrants. My great-great grandparents had their surnames changed by an illiterate from, respectively, Treitz to Trites and Lutz to Lutes.
Uhhh Tut, mmmm malaria has nothing to do with incest. Dont understand what that had to do with it unless you count the death issue for bugs.
As usual, full of mistakes. Alexis was Victoria’s great grandson.His mother, Empress Alexandra was Victoria’s granddaughter.
OOOMMMMGGGG!!. Victoria didn’t have haemophilia HERSELF for G’s sake!!!!
Here comes Queen Victoria. I won't be at all surprised to see a pic of Josephine Baker in this one. (Baker's genes would have been the best in that batch!)
If you know what Satanism is, like I do, you know that Eddie Lee Saxton was not one. He was Satan worshipper which is completely different than Satanism. I wish people knwe this. Satanism has strict tenents, that condemns violence and wrong-doing.
Why are witches portrayed as in league with the devil?
Um…. Why is Netanyahu on here ? Stop with the antisemitism . No im not Jewish , I’m Polish , in Canada , and I’m offended by idiocy .
Images should stick to the narrative
And all the royals up to this day.
I could tell those pics from the 1600s were authentic bc they were all scratched.
The egregious spelling mistakes on his name are awful.
You showed Jeffrey Dahmer's victims in one story about Wesson
OK, author, you have to seriously work on your editing. Those abrupt clips from other videos and random photos suck. 😅
This is one of the worst pod casts I hav e ever tried to watch.
The random photos tho 🙄
Satan is the ruler of this wicked system we are living in, so nothing like this should surprise us. His time is coming to an end, we are now living in the "Last Days" of Satan's rule.
Tooten Commons? I'm so done!!😂
Ancient texts from all religious forbid this it has dangerous genetic consequences.
I know the bible fairly well from my childhood and I don't recall any references to incest. I do know there's no forbidding of child sexual abuse or rape in the 10 commandments: wonder which gender wrote them?
Wow, you know all religions?
this is a pitiful video in so many ways
nbm
too bad alot of your photos do not match the people being profiled.
Hey, if you want to make videos you need to do them right. You forgot to throw in the Colloseum, a picture of Marilyn Monroe, a recipe for bear meat and a link to the death of Sid Viscous. Why be lazy?
Netanyahu was not a Hapsburg. I'm pretty sure of it. 🤣
ugh, the AI narrator and their terrible mispronunciations make me cringe
Please edit your videos a bit better. I don't need my phone yelling at me out of nowhere.
Actually marrying g your in-laws were fairly common
why do you keep making it louder suddenly. ridiculous!
Horrific
Most of these pictures don't match the stories. Try harder.
Believe it or not King Charles II of Spain was even more inbred than the average Trump voter today!
Annoying photos that don’t go with the story. Stopped watching after 2 minutes.
Just a word, pls use visual pictures that are as close to what the story you're tell your subs. I mean, really?! I get your 'low slanted go' at Prime Minister Bejamin Netanyahu and find it in very poor taste. Future wise why not try to find the visual elements you truly need, and they aren't of a personal or political nature. We're all different in what we hold in value and belief. It not one soap box fits all.
Smoked to death???😮
Very poor content with many historical and scientific errors.
I’m looking for someone who gave me a reply of a list of things wrong with the nativity scene this he meant story. I found it interesting but can’t find it anymore. If it’s you or you know who that is please send me that reply again