It was considered. My unseemly for a young woman to live with a man whose wife had died. So the dead woman's sister married her brother in law. Not incest not strange. My great great grandmother.
The British Parliament struggled with this issue for years. There's a line in Iolanthe by Gilbert and Sullivan--"He shall prick that annual blister/Marriage with deceased wife's sister" Finally the passed a law allowing it, the Deceased Wife's Sister Act in 1907.
This whole thing is stupid. Before people knew better first cousins married all the time. The Royal families of Europe were all related. That's why so many were crazy or had hemophilia. None of this is scandal. Of course I didn't get past King Tut because I could not listen anymore.
Marriage between first cousins was and is widespread, and generally not considered nor perceived as incestuous. The idea that it is was mostly born in the USA whence it spread to other anglo-saxon countries. And besides he didn't really know the issues with inbreeding as genetics were yet to be invented. It was known that inbreeding could cause issues, if only from observing domesticated animals, but the risk when marrying a first cousin is in fact very low, contrarily to what most people believe. It's similar to having a child when one of the parents is above 40, to give an example. And nobody call people who have children after 40 irresponsible. For inbreeding to really cause problems it needs either to be incest between much closer relatives (siblings, for instance) or to be repeated generation after generation, resulting in first cousins who are much more closely related genetically than first cousins normally are. This latter situation mostly happens in two cases : very small and isolated communities and some historical royal families. The video in fact mentions that there had been several first cousin marriages in Darwin's family. So, that could be the problem. On the other hand, two or three children dying in the 19th century is absolutely unsurprising, so it can't be taken as an evidence that there was a genetic issue at play. Besides, there's no mention of what genetic issue the children would have had. Having parents who are close relative doesn't make you weaker, or sickly, or prone to disease. It only gives you a higher risk of receiving from both parents the same defective gene they might have both inherited from their common grandparent (for first cousins). So, it will manifest itself in a specific way, like the hemophilia also mentioned in this video.Or the jaw issue of the Habsbourg. Not in dying young from various reasons.
@@olivierdastein2604 When I heard the narrator say that 3 of the 10 kids died, I figured that was pretty much par for the course in those times. (which would have been close to 200 years ago) Just out of curiosity, I looked up which states is 1st cousin marriage legal. It turns out 18 states, mostly located in the eastern part of the country. It makes me wonder about the other 32 & what are the reasons that those specific 18 are legal ? It would be interesting to know the history behind that.
You forgot to mention that family in Austria where the father built a living quarter under his house where he raped his own daughter for years and had 5 children by him. Josef Fritzl
YES!! And how he set it up a time or 2 to make it look like his daughter had these babies and dropped them on her parents doorstep, and mom just never questioned a thing 🤦♀️
Joseph Fritzl kept his dfaughter entrapped in his sprcial built basement for more than 20 years and had 7 children with her. Three he took upstairs to be raised by his wife and three had to grow up in the basement with their mother
My mom married brothers. The first one died in Korea. As result, my sister and I are half sisters as well as half cousins. I just consider her my sister. I don't see the problem. She had never met him prior to his brother's funeral.
You would do well to research your cases properly. Haemophilia does not require both parents to have a faulty gene nor is it prevalent because of incestuous relationships. Also, the tale of Fred and Rosemary West was grossly exaggerated. Admittedly they were a pair of sadistic and perverted individuals but they did not 'terrorize' England.
It’s possible these are film students in training. Learning through their mistakes. If it is I understand. It is a good learning tool, but if this is just some joker who is just plain bad at film making.
Report it. it's made with AI. That's why you see the ripping off of a few seconds of other people videos with their own audio that's not relevant to what's being said.
Because it's AI. it's spliced wth other people's content and clips of other people's videos. They aren't identifiynig themselves as AI and they make a fortune on ad revenue. Report and block them.
Oh dear oh dear, TRY to match up the pictures with the narrative. Its so confusing and irritating to have a full ashtray pop up, for example, when recounting how someone one was “smoked to death “ in mid 16thC. There were no cigarettes in that era, and that’s NOT how you were smoked to death. That’s ONE error. I WANT to like this channel, I really do. I can’t because you make bad editing “choices” - which are just lazy, sloppy editing. Come on, you can do better! You obviously have access to sources. Use them.
It's an AI channel. They make tons of money stealing moderately related video and pictures of others and AI writes a loosely relevant script. It's probably AI reading it too. Report them
Adding to the growing list of inaccuracies, mistakes, and just plain poor research, Rasputin was not mythical he was a mystic. But he did actually exist.
It's an AI channel, in case you didn't notice the blatant ripping off of videos with actual footage. Block and report these channels and eventually there might be less of them.
@@kruszer Well, I believed that was the case, but in case the channel was set up or being monitored by a Nigerian prince I wanted to give it the benefit of the doubt.
16:45 Tut's autopsy did not show he had front lobal epilepsy. His father, Akhenaten, probably did. It manifests with religious hallucinations. Tut was a cripple with a club foot and died from an infection when he broke his leg. I doubt he broke his leg in battle. More likely he fell down.
A lot of these visuals have nothing to do with the subject matter. Marrying his sister in law is not incest. Good grief, malaria is not caused by inbreeding.
And, Christ made it clear if a man died his brother should take her as his wife and raise.his brother's children as his own. The goal, of course was charitable care of the widow and her children.
This is the crappiest illustrations of a story that I have ever seen. I mean really it is SO BAD it's shocking! Geez, spend a little time on finding appropriate pictures to illustrate with instead of just whatever whatever that doesn't even make sense with the story that you are trying to tell.
No. Habsburg. Unless some English idiot decided that they would change the correct spelling, as has often been the case with immigrants. My great-great grandparents had their surnames changed by an illiterate from, respectively, Treitz to Trites and Lutz to Lutes. Both stupid outcomes.
In many cultures years ago, including Jewish, a man married his sister in law to "look after her". He was taking his brothers place and ensuring his brothers family did not go hungry. If he had a family with his wife/sister in law, the child took on his wife's first husbands name. Native Americans also marry their brothers widow.
I don't think they deliberately intended to make some of the incongruous images we saw - like seeing Ferdinand the Bull when talking about Ferdinand a Spanish royal but having the cartoon show up was hilarious! There were just SO MANY ERRORS both by text and visual in particular! The quality of this video was terribly abysmal. Was someone putting this together at 3am when they should have been asleep?
Inaccuracy of information, a criminal offence in my book! Strange mish mash of images, some having no relevance at all. Constant mispronunciation which is confusing to the listener and annoying in equal measure. Is this really the best you can do, with all the resources you have at your disposal? Just a quick btw....Henry V111th married his dead brothers wife Catherine of Aragon, you could hardly hold this up as the most successful marriage in history, but it certainly was not incest!
People who believe that marrying your wife's sister isn't direct incest forget that it was EXTREMELY frowned upon and illegal at the time, and WAS considered incest. That's literally what Hamlet is about to an extent, because he's upset that his father committed incest after his mother died. It was historically considered incest, even if it isn't the modern definition of what incest means today.
Incest is nowadays mostly defined by blood relationship, but historically it often included relatives by marriage. What is defined and perceived as incest is essentially cultural (with some exception like parents/children and siblings, that's pretty universal). Maybe people at the time were just thinking that it was going against the laws of god, but they might very well have been genuinely shocked because having been raised up to think this way, they saw a sister in law as a family member and envisioning having sex with her unthinkable and disgusting. Look nowadays : marriage with a first cousin is perceived in some countries not just as a bad idea, or just defined arbitrarily as incest : people there do feel that it's incest and have reactions of disgust at the thought. While the rest of the world sees it as perfectly normal and not the slightest bit disturbing. The difference is culture. Basically people feel about issues the way they've been raised to feel. So, it's perfectly possible that when marrying your sister in law was classified as incest, people were genuinely shocked by it and perceived little difference with marrying an actual blood relative. Note that at the contrary, ancient Jews made *mandatory* to marry your sister in law if her husband (your brother) had died without having children. Your duty was, sort of, to give him a descendance.
"...back then witches practiced their dark arts in secret," says the narrator. Feminist translation: "Back then, men persecuted women publicly, calling them witches." Unacceptable narration. "Wiches" were not Halloween cutouts; they bore the mark of being female, alone.
The part about hemophilia is inaccurate. It is a x-chomosome linked genetic mutation which occurs spontaneously. It almost never affects females as it is masked by their second x-chromosome, but who can still pass down the gene to their descendants. It is only expressed in males where there is no second x-chromosome. Until recently, boys born with hemophilia almost never survived into adulthood so chances of breeding, let alone inbreeding, were exceedingly low
The poor guy that married his dead wife's sister was done wrong, for sure. There was nothing immoral about what he did and there was no "inbreeding" since he had no genetic connection to his second wife. it sounds to me like this was a simple matter of some kind of religious fervor that sought to meet out the most heinous punishment on someone. What a horrible thing!!
It is a common practice to marry one's deceased spouse's sibling, and it it ridiculous to call this "incest." Your opinion is that his death sentence "matched the intensity of his crime"?? What planet are you on???????????
Who in the world chose the pictures for the stories? Some of them are close, some are WAY out there. And don't try adding the captions. They're obviously written by someone (AI?) who has no knowledge of the English language. Shame on you for putting out pure crap.
Poor taste??? Depending on the circumstances, it may be both caring and civilized. The first marriage would be honorable. As time passes, the surviving spouse is free to marry. A sibling to the deceased spouse may be an appropriate and loving choice.
1st story: at that time, the church was in charge of things matrimonial. Nils needed to get a dispensation from the church, he skipped that step, hence the furor. Marrying Lucy's sister made her his siter, in the eyes of Christians at the time. Henry VIII had to get a dispensationfrom the Pope for his first and second wives. Katherine because she been married to his late brother [although she and her ladies said it was not consummated], Anne because he'd already slept with her sister. The consummation made Anne in the same category as Katherine per the church.
Marrying the next of kin to a dead marriage mate was a requirement of the Mosiac law. It seems that the Catholic Church in the middle ages didn't know the Bible. They should have known about the story of Ruth. The Church also failed to point out this example to Henry VIII.
It’s not incest to marry your dead wife’s sister. That’s was the law but, a good lawyer could’ve fought that. He didn’t even have any children from his first wife?
Not, he couldn't have fought that, as it was unambiguously the law. And incest is whatever is defined as incest by your society and you have learned to perceive in this way. You live in the USA? Sex with your first cousin is definitely incest, and marrying her obviously forbidden. But it's neither forbidden by law nor perceived as incest by people in most of the rest of the world; including for instance in most of western Europe. So, is sex/marriage with your cousin incest or not? And if it's forbidden in your state, can a good lawyer fight it? How? By pointing to the fact that it's not forbidden in most of the rest of the world? Not a chance that it will work. Similarly in this case, even if you were totally convinced that it's not incest, that wouldn't prevail in court. Besides, you wouldn't think that because you would have been raised in that society and so for you incest would obviously include in-laws. Everybody would know that, and probably everybody, including you, would be totally shocked by such an inappropriate relationship
18:30 Aww man, my heart goes out to her 💔. My father m0lested me, but my mother refused to believe me...idk how I'd feel if she had & actually helped him keep it a secret 😢
Siblings can choose to have DNA testing, PGD (prenatal genetic diagnosis) and IVF (in vitro fertilization), and their offspring may be genetically healthier than they are if the embryos are selected based on genetic testing, including dominant and recessive alleles. Let's look at how this works in a more detailed context: 1. Initial situation: Suppose that a sibling is both heterozygous carriers of a recessive gene (Aa), meaning that they each carry one dominant allele A and one recessive allele a. For example, if this is a gene that causes a genetic disorder in a recessive form (such as cystic fibrosis or phenylketonuria), then both parents will not exhibit the disorder, but can pass it on to their children if the child inherits two recessive alleles aa. These parents have a 75% chance that their child will be healthy (genotype AA or Aa) and a 25% chance that the child will inherit a disease (genotype aa). 2. The Genetic Testing and PGD Process: When a brother and sister decide to undergo IVF with PGD, they can: Undergo genetic testing for recessive disease carriers. This will show that they both have the Aa genotype. As part of the IVF procedure, several embryos will be created and each of them will be tested for recessive diseases (performed by PGD). 3. How does PGD work?: PGD can select healthy embryos (i.e. those with the AA or Aa genotypes) and also exclude embryos with the aa genotype, which could inherit a recessive disease. If we take into account that both parents have the Aa genotype, then the possible genotypes of their embryos are as follows: AA - two dominant alleles (will not be a carrier of the disease). Aa or aA - a carrier of the disease, but does not manifest it (since the dominant allele A suppresses the recessive a). aa - two recessive alleles, and the embryo will have a disease associated with this recessive gene. 4. A child with the AA genotype is “healthier” than the parents: PGD allows us to select embryos with the AA genotype - that is, with two dominant alleles, which makes them “genetically healthier” than the parents with the Aa genotype. Such embryos will not be carriers of recessive diseases and will not be susceptible to diseases associated with the recessive gene. A child with the AA genotype will not only be healthy, but will also not be a carrier of recessive diseases, making them "genetically more robust" than their parents. For example, if this child were to start a family in the future, they would not be able to pass on a recessive disease to their children, since they do not have the recessive allele in their genotype. 5. Why might offspring be healthier than their parents?: The parents (brother and sister) are both carriers of a recessive gene (genotype Aa), which means that they can pass on this recessive gene to their children, and if both parents receive the recessive allele, the child will receive the genotype aa and will develop the disease. However, PGD can select embryos with the AA or Aa genotype, but not with the aa genotype. Embryos with the AA genotype will be healthy, will not be carriers, and will not pass on the disease to the next generation. Embryos with the Aa genotype will be carriers like their parents, but will not exhibit the disease. So a child with the AA genotype selected by PGD will be genetically healthier than their parents, as they will not be a carrier of the recessive disease that the parents could pass on. 6. What are the chances of a "healthy" child? Without PGD, children of parents with the Aa genotype have a 25% chance of inheriting the aa genotype and having the disease. With PGD, the chances of a healthy child become almost 100%, as embryos with the aa genotype will be screened out and only embryos with the AA or Aa genotypes will be implanted in the uterus. Conclusion: With DNA testing, PGD, and IVF, siblings can conceive offspring that are genetically more stable and healthy than themselves. This is possible because PGD can select embryos with the AA genotype that will not be carriers of the recessive disease and will not be susceptible to it, unlike parents with the Aa genotype. The chances of a "healthy child" for a brother and sister after using PGD are almost 100%.
@@marciaturkiewicz7255 No. Habsburg. Unless some English idiot decided that they would change the correct spelling, as has often been the case with immigrants. My great-great grandparents had their surnames changed by an illiterate from, respectively, Treitz to Trites and Lutz to Lutes.
Satan is the ruler of this wicked system we are living in, so nothing like this should surprise us. His time is coming to an end, we are now living in the "Last Days" of Satan's rule.
I question how these people hide out( as in the Sexton case)and the length of time passed before discovery? These children and young adults that have survived would have such great psychological problems. How very maddening these predators exist. I feel for any and all victims.
My siblings and I grew up in that kind of household. My 2 eldest sisters had a baby each by our father. Come to find out years later, they weren’t his biological daughters, but still, he raised them as such. Our mother participated in it. She would come get them and take them to him as well as participate in the act. Our parents took the babies and our mother raised them as hers. They were each in their teens when they found out my mother was not their mother. There’s a whole lot more to the story, but I tried my best to summarize. How our parents got away with it all is because, we always lived out in the country. The oldest of the 2, was killed by our mother and our dad buried her out in the barn. My other sister, was scared she was pregnant again and ran away, I also left home at 16, got a job and took care of myself. All my brothers ran away by the age of 14, they would get in trouble with the law and get sent back or get thrown in jail. We all told people that we should’ve been able to trust and help us, but no one did.
@ I’m so sorry your life and family were so bad. I have a close friend who is an incest survivor and I’ve seen her go through very traumatic times during her life due to this. She, like you, left home at 16 and fended for herself.I hope you have had counselling and have been able to look forward not backward. Sad to say but you are not alone. 😔
Watch the Consequences of Marrying your cousin. It is on RUclips.( I think it was a Channel 4 documentary) It is about Indian/Pakistani couples who have had disabled children. Bradford has a high Pakistani community and it has a very high incidence of disabled children.
You would think the Royals would stop with the inbreeding. The Scots were very careful about inbreeding. The Royals would typically choose a wife in another country for that very reason.
Marrying the sister of a deceased wife was common practice in the settling of America. There would probably be children with no mother to care for them and a single aunt would be familiar. Dad's needed to work.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
💙 Don’t miss out! Subscribe for quick video summaries! - vintage-tv.beehiiv.com/
I agree. That happens sometimes , but they are not blood related
Exactly! It makes no sense that they would call it "incest"! After all, he wasn't marrying HIS SISTER!!! 🙄🙄🙄
@@tobascoheat6582 but it's still NASTY 🤣🤣😎
That one woman looks like Michelle obama
@christineweaver3090 put your glasses on Please. 🤣🤣🤣
It may have been a law, but marrying your deceased wife’s sister is not incest.
Its still kinda outthere...
@@spiritthingwagreed 😩
Totally agree. My friend had had two sons to brothers?
True
Yiyi. King Charles II , was autopsy with a tiny atrophied testicle. Not really breeding material
Marrying your dead ife's sister isn't incest. It's bad taste, at the very least.
It was considered. My unseemly for a young woman to live with a man whose wife had died. So the dead woman's sister married her brother in law. Not incest not strange. My great great grandmother.
The British Parliament struggled with this issue for years. There's a line in Iolanthe by Gilbert and Sullivan--"He shall prick that annual blister/Marriage with deceased wife's sister" Finally the passed a law allowing it, the Deceased Wife's Sister Act in 1907.
Tradition in some cultures.
I have 2 uncles married the same lady then one went and married her again lol
Reminds me of bidens son having a fling with his dad's brother bo's wife.
The mispronunciation of the narrative and the juxtaposition of unrelated clips made this one an editorial FAIL
Thank you.
Thanks I'm 24 seconds in. I won't watch
Thank you.
and the subtitles? OMG
Yeah, I was shocked when The picture of BB Netanyahu popped out for no rhyme or reason.
AI
Marry a wife's sister not incest if not linked geneticly.
This whole thing is stupid. Before people knew better first cousins married all the time. The Royal families of Europe were all related. That's why so many were crazy or had hemophilia. None of this is scandal. Of course I didn't get past King Tut because I could not listen anymore.
What always amazed me was Darwin, he knew the issues with inbreeding then marries his cousin
Marriage between first cousins was and is widespread, and generally not considered nor perceived as incestuous. The idea that it is was mostly born in the USA whence it spread to other anglo-saxon countries. And besides he didn't really know the issues with inbreeding as genetics were yet to be invented. It was known that inbreeding could cause issues, if only from observing domesticated animals, but the risk when marrying a first cousin is in fact very low, contrarily to what most people believe. It's similar to having a child when one of the parents is above 40, to give an example. And nobody call people who have children after 40 irresponsible.
For inbreeding to really cause problems it needs either to be incest between much closer relatives (siblings, for instance) or to be repeated generation after generation, resulting in first cousins who are much more closely related genetically than first cousins normally are. This latter situation mostly happens in two cases : very small and isolated communities and some historical royal families. The video in fact mentions that there had been several first cousin marriages in Darwin's family. So, that could be the problem. On the other hand, two or three children dying in the 19th century is absolutely unsurprising, so it can't be taken as an evidence that there was a genetic issue at play. Besides, there's no mention of what genetic issue the children would have had. Having parents who are close relative doesn't make you weaker, or sickly, or prone to disease. It only gives you a higher risk of receiving from both parents the same defective gene they might have both inherited from their common grandparent (for first cousins). So, it will manifest itself in a specific way, like the hemophilia also mentioned in this video.Or the jaw issue of the Habsbourg. Not in dying young from various reasons.
@@olivierdastein2604 When I heard the narrator say that 3 of the 10 kids died, I figured that was pretty much par for the course in those times. (which would have been close to 200 years ago) Just out of curiosity, I looked up which states is 1st cousin marriage legal. It turns out 18 states, mostly located in the eastern part of the country. It makes me wonder about the other 32 & what are the reasons that those specific 18 are legal ? It would be interesting to know the history behind that.
@@peggypeggy4137It's legal to marry one's cousin in 26 States of the USA.
⁰
Not to be funny but ppl do still marry their first cousins today.
You forgot to mention that family in Austria where the father built a living quarter under his house where he raped his own daughter for years and had 5 children by him. Josef Fritzl
I was just wondering why they didn’t mention that as well!
YES!! And how he set it up a time or 2 to make it look like his daughter had these babies and dropped them on her parents doorstep, and mom just never questioned a thing 🤦♀️
Yes, that case really creeps me out. The poor daughter, and her poor kids living in that sm underground room.
SHE HAD 7 KIDS WITH HER FATHER, 1 BABY BOY DIED AND HE BURNED HIM IN THE FURNACE...
Joseph Fritzl kept his dfaughter entrapped in his sprcial built basement for more than 20 years and had 7 children with her. Three he took upstairs to be raised by his wife and three had to grow up in the basement with their mother
My mom married brothers. The first one died in Korea. As result, my sister and I are half sisters as well as half cousins. I just consider her my sister. I don't see the problem. She had never met him prior to his brother's funeral.
Biblical law ordered men to marry their deceased brother's widow to protect the offspring.
Yada.
Not incest, but questionable.
You would do well to research your cases properly. Haemophilia does not require both parents to have a faulty gene nor is it prevalent because of incestuous relationships. Also, the tale of Fred and Rosemary West was grossly exaggerated. Admittedly they were a pair of sadistic and perverted individuals but they did not 'terrorize' England.
Had to stop watching because of the poor editing and inaccuracy of information. Terrible video
It’s possible these are film students in training. Learning through their mistakes. If it is I understand. It is a good learning tool, but if this is just some joker who is just plain bad at film making.
Love you too❤
Oops sorry , this is the wrong site . That was for my granddaughter😊
@@cherihardesty9333I'll take it! Love you too.
Oh this video............??? It's impossible to watch anymore of this video. Way too many mistakes.
YEAH. A TOTALLY AMATEUR PRODUCTION.
That's not a mistake!
Right. I wanted to see a depiction of Ferdinand but now I don’t know who is pictured. Disgusting material.
Report it. it's made with AI. That's why you see the ripping off of a few seconds of other people videos with their own audio that's not relevant to what's being said.
Why are you showing drawings of British India while talking about Connecticut?
A I .
The whole thing is a laughable mess
@@andreabenfell5580stupid ! A.I. Stupid !
British Royal Family are notorious through history for inbreeding
Because it's AI. it's spliced wth other people's content and clips of other people's videos. They aren't identifiynig themselves as AI and they make a fortune on ad revenue. Report and block them.
Oh dear oh dear, TRY to match up the pictures with the narrative. Its so confusing and irritating to have a full ashtray pop up, for example, when recounting how someone one was “smoked to death “ in mid 16thC. There were no cigarettes in that era, and that’s NOT how you were smoked to death. That’s ONE error. I WANT to like this channel, I really do. I can’t because you make bad editing “choices” - which are just lazy, sloppy editing. Come on, you can do better! You obviously have access to sources. Use them.
It's an AI channel. They make tons of money stealing moderately related video and pictures of others and AI writes a loosely relevant script. It's probably AI reading it too. Report them
Historical tidbit: Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln were born on the same day in 1809. In small towns it is hard to not marry your cousin.
Adding to the growing list of inaccuracies, mistakes, and just plain poor research, Rasputin was not mythical he was a mystic. But he did actually exist.
It's an AI channel, in case you didn't notice the blatant ripping off of videos with actual footage. Block and report these channels and eventually there might be less of them.
@@kruszer Well, I believed that was the case, but in case the channel was set up or being monitored by a Nigerian prince I wanted to give it the benefit of the doubt.
Who in the world spliced/edited this video ? ITS CRAZY !....🤷..🥴
Why, what's wrong with it? It's meant too be older, hence the effects.
@@spiritthingw your an uneducated comentator
It’s A.I.
@@spiritthingwEdward Cullen? Lol!
At least it’s consistent by being inconsistent!
A lot of these visuals have nothing to do with the subject matter.
It's AI garbage blatantly stealing from other people's videos. Block and report them
The closed captions are unintentionally hilarious.
Haha! I agree! It’s more fascinating than the video.
Tutaka Moon, Tuton Common, Took in Common, Tooton Common. Made me laugh so much, I couldnt watch anymore😂
The whole thing was hilarious, I'm afraid.
I must totally agree 😅
Marrying his sister in law is not incest.
16:45 Tut's autopsy did not show he had front lobal epilepsy. His father, Akhenaten, probably did. It manifests with religious hallucinations. Tut was a cripple with a club foot and died from an infection when he broke his leg. I doubt he broke his leg in battle. More likely he fell down.
A lot of these visuals have nothing to do with the subject matter. Marrying his sister in law is not incest. Good grief, malaria is not caused by inbreeding.
It was against church teachings to marry a deceased spouses sibling!
YES it is Incest Having sex with Any Inlaws or kin GOD said So Deuteronomy 30:15-20 Deuteronomy 28-30 chapters fully
Abortionist Drunks Druggies Whoredoms Homosexual Same sex Marriage Trans ALL DEVIL Sin Abomination Against GOD DISGRACE TO HUMAN RACE Genisis 19:24-25
Good grief, malaria is not caused by inbreeding.
Ikr 😅
The Bible says if your brother dies and you’re not married you should marry his widow and raise his children as his own, to honor your brother. 😊
Also your children will count as the children of the deseased brother and this is what Onan didn't want to happen
@@madhattie2952 So he spilled his seed, and he died for being rebellious and disobedient.
Exited at 1:17; AI narration and crawl were rubbish.
Can you show the pictures that are supposed to go with the commentary?
Or at least don’t mix old and modern photos. It’s aggravating!
The first example is neither incest nor inbreeding. Marrying a deceased spouses sibling doesn't even come close.
Uh hello, marrying your dead wife's sister is NOT incest!
And, Christ made it clear if a man died his brother should take her as his wife and raise.his brother's children as his own. The goal, of course was charitable care of the widow and her children.
Most of photos don't have anything to do with what your talking about.With that don't include them.
This is the crappiest illustrations of a story that I have ever seen. I mean really it is SO BAD it's shocking! Geez, spend a little time on finding appropriate pictures to illustrate with instead of just whatever whatever that doesn't even make sense with the story that you are trying to tell.
As usual, full of mistakes. Alexis was Victoria’s great grandson.His mother, Empress Alexandra was Victoria’s granddaughter.
Hapsburg, not Hamsburg!
No. Habsburg. Unless some English idiot decided that they would change the correct spelling, as has often been the case with immigrants. My great-great grandparents had their surnames changed by an illiterate from, respectively, Treitz to Trites and Lutz to Lutes. Both stupid outcomes.
Habsburg is the correct name.
@@cf8959 Habsburg in English, Hapsburg in Deutsch.
The Whitakers
In many cultures years ago, including Jewish, a man married his sister in law to "look after her". He was taking his brothers place and ensuring his brothers family did not go hungry. If he had a family with his wife/sister in law, the child took on his wife's first husbands name. Native Americans also marry their brothers widow.
I don't think they deliberately intended to make some of the incongruous images we saw - like seeing Ferdinand the Bull when talking about Ferdinand a Spanish royal but having the cartoon show up was hilarious! There were just SO MANY ERRORS both by text and visual in particular! The quality of this video was terribly abysmal. Was someone putting this together at 3am when they should have been asleep?
I rather think that whole video was generated by an AI on the basis of the text.
Inaccuracy of information, a criminal offence in my book! Strange mish mash of images, some having no relevance at all. Constant mispronunciation which is confusing to the listener and annoying in equal measure. Is this really the best you can do, with all the resources you have at your disposal? Just a quick btw....Henry V111th married his dead brothers wife Catherine of Aragon, you could hardly hold this up as the most successful marriage in history, but it certainly was not incest!
People who believe that marrying your wife's sister isn't direct incest forget that it was EXTREMELY frowned upon and illegal at the time, and WAS considered incest. That's literally what Hamlet is about to an extent, because he's upset that his father committed incest after his mother died. It was historically considered incest, even if it isn't the modern definition of what incest means today.
It's another world these people live in, a very disturbing one.
How is it incest when a man who falls in love with his sister in law?
And back then, more often than not, they didn’t marry for love, a lot of times, it was out of necessity.
Incest is nowadays mostly defined by blood relationship, but historically it often included relatives by marriage. What is defined and perceived as incest is essentially cultural (with some exception like parents/children and siblings, that's pretty universal). Maybe people at the time were just thinking that it was going against the laws of god, but they might very well have been genuinely shocked because having been raised up to think this way, they saw a sister in law as a family member and envisioning having sex with her unthinkable and disgusting. Look nowadays : marriage with a first cousin is perceived in some countries not just as a bad idea, or just defined arbitrarily as incest : people there do feel that it's incest and have reactions of disgust at the thought. While the rest of the world sees it as perfectly normal and not the slightest bit disturbing. The difference is culture. Basically people feel about issues the way they've been raised to feel. So, it's perfectly possible that when marrying your sister in law was classified as incest, people were genuinely shocked by it and perceived little difference with marrying an actual blood relative. Note that at the contrary, ancient Jews made *mandatory* to marry your sister in law if her husband (your brother) had died without having children. Your duty was, sort of, to give him a descendance.
17:40 Why would y'all incorporate the Jeffrey Dahmer victims innit? They have nothing to do with the incest/breeding topic..?
Not sure which I hate more, AI narration or idiotically incorrect AI captions! This video sucks!
🎶it's the end of the world as we know it...🎶 nothing will ever be the same thanks to tech.
But malaria is not genetic.
"...back then witches practiced their dark arts in secret," says the narrator. Feminist translation: "Back then, men persecuted women publicly, calling them witches." Unacceptable narration. "Wiches" were not Halloween cutouts; they bore the mark of being female, alone.
The part about hemophilia is inaccurate. It is a x-chomosome linked genetic mutation which occurs spontaneously. It almost never affects females as it is masked by their second x-chromosome, but who can still pass down the gene to their descendants. It is only expressed in males where there is no second x-chromosome. Until recently, boys born with hemophilia almost never survived into adulthood so chances of breeding, let alone inbreeding, were exceedingly low
Why is a photo line up of Jeff Dahmers victims being shown during the Wessen segment ????
I personally feel that Mackenzie Phillips has a habit of lying, so unsure if she's believable.
The other random pictures thrown into this video are distracting and confusing.
Hey. Using film photos of people absolutely not the narrative tells. Fie
You didn't mention Josef Fritzl
The poor guy that married his dead wife's sister was done wrong, for sure. There was nothing immoral about what he did and there was no "inbreeding" since he had no genetic connection to his second wife. it sounds to me like this was a simple matter of some kind of religious fervor that sought to meet out the most heinous punishment on someone. What a horrible thing!!
OOOMMMMGGGG!!. Victoria didn’t have haemophilia HERSELF for G’s sake!!!!
It is a common practice to marry one's deceased spouse's sibling, and it it ridiculous to call this "incest." Your opinion is that his death sentence "matched the intensity of his crime"?? What planet are you on???????????
Darwin’s an idiot. An evolutionist and marries his first cousin.
No shit! Smart man...uh, not...
Exactly
Well if it was good enough for the Royals .........
Yet to this day, so many people believe in his evolution theory 🤦♀️
Marrying your cousin is allowed
Who in the world chose the pictures for the stories? Some of them are close, some are WAY out there. And don't try adding the captions. They're obviously written by someone (AI?) who has no knowledge of the English language. Shame on you for putting out pure crap.
Images should stick to the narrative
Czarina Romanov was Queen Victoria’s grand daughter, not her daughter.
Many inappropriate pictures for the narration. Incest between father & daughters shows pic of lovers kissing. Just awful.
Shocking editing - I can’t finish this.
Why are you including photos of other places and people that have other separate issues and crimes such as jeffery dahmers victims are cartoons ?
When your sibling snuffs it, it's perfectly okay to marry the widow/widower. Not in the best of taste, but certainly not incest.
To myself that could be interpreted as a responsible kindness.
Poor taste???
Depending on the circumstances, it may be both caring and civilized.
The first marriage would be honorable. As time passes, the surviving spouse is free to marry. A sibling to the deceased spouse may be an appropriate and loving choice.
1st story: at that time, the church was in charge of things matrimonial. Nils needed to get a dispensation from the church, he skipped that step, hence the furor. Marrying Lucy's sister made her his siter, in the eyes of Christians at the time. Henry VIII had to get a dispensationfrom the Pope for his first and second wives. Katherine because she been married to his late brother [although she and her ladies said it was not consummated], Anne because he'd already slept with her sister. The consummation made Anne in the same category as Katherine per the church.
The first 1 is not incest she was his dead wife's sister and no relation to him
Apart from the audio being confusing AI? the video is worse 😞
A kid in grade 4 could've produced a better quality article. Everything about this is just wrong mate 😵💫
What a waste of my precious time 😐
You showed Jeffrey Dahmer's victims in one story about Wesson
Marrying the next of kin to a dead marriage mate was a requirement of the Mosiac law. It seems that the Catholic Church in the middle ages didn't know the Bible. They should have known about the story of Ruth. The Church also failed to point out this example to Henry VIII.
Showing Jeffrey Dahmer's victims! What!? That doesn't have a thing to do with this subject except it's evil.
The subtitles are randomly written. They need someone to correct them.
I liked info but pictures were insane 🤬🤬
A lot of the "info" is inaccurate and very poorly researched
The correct term is Hapsburg jaw, not Hamsburg jaw.
There are other booboos and odd matchings of photos to text/narration.
who in the world are ALL THESE PPL in the excessive clips??
Leave that life
When showing Wesson's victims they actually showed pictures of Jeffrey Dahmer's victims?? Sensationalism is getting ridiculous in these videos!
I'm surprised you didn't mention Josef Fritzl.
Ever noticed how many killers are Germanic ? Dahmer , List , Fritzl and more …
@@alicesamuels3937yes, I thought the same thing 🤨
It’s not incest to marry your dead wife’s sister. That’s was the law but, a good lawyer could’ve fought that. He didn’t even have any children from his first wife?
Not, he couldn't have fought that, as it was unambiguously the law. And incest is whatever is defined as incest by your society and you have learned to perceive in this way. You live in the USA? Sex with your first cousin is definitely incest, and marrying her obviously forbidden. But it's neither forbidden by law nor perceived as incest by people in most of the rest of the world; including for instance in most of western Europe. So, is sex/marriage with your cousin incest or not? And if it's forbidden in your state, can a good lawyer fight it? How? By pointing to the fact that it's not forbidden in most of the rest of the world? Not a chance that it will work. Similarly in this case, even if you were totally convinced that it's not incest, that wouldn't prevail in court. Besides, you wouldn't think that because you would have been raised in that society and so for you incest would obviously include in-laws. Everybody would know that, and probably everybody, including you, would be totally shocked by such an inappropriate relationship
18:30 Aww man, my heart goes out to her 💔. My father m0lested me, but my mother refused to believe me...idk how I'd feel if she had & actually helped him keep it a secret 😢
Please edit your videos a bit better. I don't need my phone yelling at me out of nowhere.
Siblings can choose to have DNA testing, PGD (prenatal genetic diagnosis) and IVF (in vitro fertilization), and their offspring may be genetically healthier than they are if the embryos are selected based on genetic testing, including dominant and recessive alleles.
Let's look at how this works in a more detailed context:
1. Initial situation:
Suppose that a sibling is both heterozygous carriers of a recessive gene (Aa), meaning that they each carry one dominant allele A and one recessive allele a. For example, if this is a gene that causes a genetic disorder in a recessive form (such as cystic fibrosis or phenylketonuria), then both parents will not exhibit the disorder, but can pass it on to their children if the child inherits two recessive alleles aa.
These parents have a 75% chance that their child will be healthy (genotype AA or Aa) and a 25% chance that the child will inherit a disease (genotype aa).
2. The Genetic Testing and PGD Process:
When a brother and sister decide to undergo IVF with PGD, they can:
Undergo genetic testing for recessive disease carriers. This will show that they both have the Aa genotype.
As part of the IVF procedure, several embryos will be created and each of them will be tested for recessive diseases (performed by PGD).
3. How does PGD work?:
PGD can select healthy embryos (i.e. those with the AA or Aa genotypes) and also exclude embryos with the aa genotype, which could inherit a recessive disease.
If we take into account that both parents have the Aa genotype, then the possible genotypes of their embryos are as follows:
AA - two dominant alleles (will not be a carrier of the disease).
Aa or aA - a carrier of the disease, but does not manifest it (since the dominant allele A suppresses the recessive a).
aa - two recessive alleles, and the embryo will have a disease associated with this recessive gene.
4. A child with the AA genotype is “healthier” than the parents:
PGD allows us to select embryos with the AA genotype - that is, with two dominant alleles, which makes them “genetically healthier” than the parents with the Aa genotype. Such embryos will not be carriers of recessive diseases and will not be susceptible to diseases associated with the recessive gene.
A child with the AA genotype will not only be healthy, but will also not be a carrier of recessive diseases, making them "genetically more robust" than their parents. For example, if this child were to start a family in the future, they would not be able to pass on a recessive disease to their children, since they do not have the recessive allele in their genotype.
5. Why might offspring be healthier than their parents?:
The parents (brother and sister) are both carriers of a recessive gene (genotype Aa), which means that they can pass on this recessive gene to their children, and if both parents receive the recessive allele, the child will receive the genotype aa and will develop the disease.
However, PGD can select embryos with the AA or Aa genotype, but not with the aa genotype.
Embryos with the AA genotype will be healthy, will not be carriers, and will not pass on the disease to the next generation.
Embryos with the Aa genotype will be carriers like their parents, but will not exhibit the disease.
So a child with the AA genotype selected by PGD will be genetically healthier than their parents, as they will not be a carrier of the recessive disease that the parents could pass on.
6. What are the chances of a "healthy" child?
Without PGD, children of parents with the Aa genotype have a 25% chance of inheriting the aa genotype and having the disease.
With PGD, the chances of a healthy child become almost 100%, as embryos with the aa genotype will be screened out and only embryos with the AA or Aa genotypes will be implanted in the uterus.
Conclusion:
With DNA testing, PGD, and IVF, siblings can conceive offspring that are genetically more stable and healthy than themselves. This is possible because PGD can select embryos with the AA genotype that will not be carriers of the recessive disease and will not be susceptible to it, unlike parents with the Aa genotype. The chances of a "healthy child" for a brother and sister after using PGD are almost 100%.
❤ This. was a problem that has gone on through out history in our 🌎 world!
It's HABSBURG ... Not Hamsburg!
Hapsberg
@@marciaturkiewicz7255 No. Habsburg. Unless some English idiot decided that they would change the correct spelling, as has often been the case with immigrants. My great-great grandparents had their surnames changed by an illiterate from, respectively, Treitz to Trites and Lutz to Lutes.
this is a pitiful video in so many ways
Satan is the ruler of this wicked system we are living in, so nothing like this should surprise us. His time is coming to an end, we are now living in the "Last Days" of Satan's rule.
And he's angry
I always thought that it's kinda ironic that Darwin the pioneer of The thought of evolution and natural selection was married to his 1st cousin 🤔 😂😂😂
Even just adding the transcript can be less distracting than adding random images unrelated to the story
Rasputin wasn’t “mythical.” I think you meant “mystical.”
18:34 Tf Is this guy? I've never heard of it.
Never marry ur own sister or brother ...!! Even close cousins by blood...!!
Netanyahu was not a Hapsburg. I'm pretty sure of it. 🤣
Number one was the worst because marrying your deceased , or divorced ,wife's sister isn't incest .
Uhhh Tut, mmmm malaria has nothing to do with incest. Dont understand what that had to do with it unless you count the death issue for bugs.
know that outblood by reason or leave
What's with the "schizophrenic" editing and the sudden "cameo" appearances of unrelated bs....
Tooten Commons? I'm so done!!😂
Ikr😂
I question how these people hide out( as in the Sexton case)and the length of time passed before discovery? These children and young adults that have survived would have such great psychological problems. How very maddening these predators exist. I feel for any and all victims.
My siblings and I grew up in that kind of household. My 2 eldest sisters had a baby each by our father. Come to find out years later, they weren’t his biological daughters, but still, he raised them as such. Our mother participated in it. She would come get them and take them to him as well as participate in the act.
Our parents took the babies and our mother raised them as hers. They were each in their teens when they found out my mother was not their mother. There’s a whole lot more to the story, but I tried my best to summarize. How our parents got away with it all is because, we always lived out in the country. The oldest of the 2, was killed by our mother and our dad buried her out in the barn. My other sister, was scared she was pregnant again and ran away, I also left home at 16, got a job and took care of myself. All my brothers ran away by the age of 14, they would get in trouble with the law and get sent back or get thrown in jail.
We all told people that we should’ve been able to trust and help us, but no one did.
@ I’m so sorry your life and family were so bad. I have a close friend who is an incest survivor and I’ve seen her go through very traumatic times during her life due to this. She, like you, left home at 16 and fended for herself.I hope you have had counselling and have been able to look forward not backward. Sad to say but you are not alone. 😔
Watch the Consequences of Marrying your cousin. It is on RUclips.( I think it was a Channel 4 documentary) It is about Indian/Pakistani couples who have had disabled children. Bradford has a high Pakistani community and it has a very high incidence of disabled children.
8:31 what was that about?
The extra unrelated pictures do not do anything to up your channel, if anything the opposite.
1st cousin marriage is technically not incest and is completely legal
You would think the Royals would stop with the inbreeding. The Scots were very careful about inbreeding. The Royals would typically choose a wife in another country for that very reason.
Marrying the sister of a deceased wife was common practice in the settling of America. There would probably be children with no mother to care for them and a single aunt would be familiar. Dad's needed to work.