Yea true Ig I was also wondering what was up with his voice, as he was a navy admiral general so I thought his voice would've been extremely stern and manly.
controversial is the islamic cleric or the fire and brim preacher ,these people here werent just controversial figures my friend,these were some of the last survivors of what many people regard as evil personified on this earth,they were allowed to finish because everytime they spoke more was learned of there thinking,actions and ultimatley crimes. for comparrison when the Israelis captured eichman they interview him for 9 months, 3500 pages of transcripts and still didnt get everything out of him. every little snippet was sought becuase people want to understand what made them do it
Actually, interrupting someone and pressing him with the absurdity of their lies can sometimes be the only way to stop someone from spreading propaganda. I'm not saying it's ideal, I'm not saying it's pleasant, but sometimes it's the only way left to go. Take a guy like Vladimir Putin, if you just listen to him and don't question what he says, he appears to be a very well intended individual whose right about pretty much everything. However, a significant number of his actions are completely opposed to what he preaches. Unfortunately, the guy is a fascist and doesn't mind killing journalists, so you very rarely have admitting to the terrible actions he committed and still commits. So, while I hate how people always talk over each other nowadays, I also have to say that I hate being served bullshit. The thing is, a guy like Putin, as cruel as he is, is not an idiot. The man has horrible values, but he's bright and that's a problem.
@@Toro_Da_Corsa Not just him, many other Nazi officials. Wernher von Braun, an SS officer who frequently used Jewish slave labor, also weasled himself out of punishment by changing his allegiance. Many Jews never saw justice and their oppressors were let go.
He was the only high ranked Nazi that acknowledged the Holocaust and the Nazi scheme and showed regret. He was a valuable witness against people with more influence and responsibility. Speer was an architect (for buildings) and also in charge of logistical concerns late war, if I'm not mistaken. He wasn't a big fish in the scheme of the responsibility. Or, at least, as big a fish as the people he would be testifying against.
Yea he played the game very well, if I didn't know enything about him I would of said he was a gentleman, very level headed I have to say but a complete hypocrite
What surprises me is not Speer, Speer is as calculated as you'd expect. Dönitz surprised me. Because he answered in the way an admiral would - utilitarian and almost distanced, but with a sort of surpressed regret. Fascinating to watch.
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
Didnt hear a single bit of regret from Doenitz. He evaded all questions and came up with dumb excuses during the whole interview. Afterall a nazi with no regrets whatsoever
@@mace11880 that’s the impression I got as well. Still blinded by the ideology even into his old age, which is surprising because Hitler turned down his offer numerous times for more U Boats early in the war
There's a funny story in Doenitz's memoirs about when he first got appointed as Hitler's successor. Himmler came to see him with some SS guys and Doenitz said he hid a pistol on his desk under some papers because he wasn't sure what was going to happen.
Joshua Dausch ---- I recall reading somewhere that about that time, German civil and military groups were vying with each other for prominence and there were quite a number of secret bump-offs.
Speer says in his memoir that there were attempts by Himmler to bump him off and hints that some other senior figures in the hierarchy such as Todt were assassinated via such methods as mysterious plane crashes (he said that the planes had self destruct device that was likely activated) or in his case giving him the wrong medical treatment
Funny, or chilling? Such pervasive fear may have been why so many top leaders who may have otherwise spoke out against the extermination camps, instead kept quiet.
@@sdsd2e2321 Sorry, better now: ... and both, Hess and Speer, were Hitler's homosexual secret lovers, who did guide his politics from the background. ... but this is my theory... Hoever, fact is, that an uneducated lazy man who does not understand anything can make plans for the development of a big modern country. Hitler was pampered by many: Getting army training as propagandist, anti-semitist, anti-bolshevist etc., getting lifestyle advise from USA-adviser, Hanfstengl, getting speaker training, propaganda photographers, filmmakers, a huge government staff,
Regardless of what we think about these men, and what they did or didn't know, you can't deny that it's absolutely fascinating to watch these interviews, and some remarkable journalism.
Since you find it fascinating and engaging may i humbly suggest you read Speer's Spandau The Secret Diaries and his 2nd book Inside The Third Reich. I promise you you will be utterly engaged and unable to put them down until you finish them. I just read Spandau again . Its 450 pages did not bore me for one minute . Speer has a very fluid engaging way of writing combined with some dry wit .
@@robertmanfredthurrigl9424 Agreed! I am reading it now. When I was taking care of my father's affairs this January after he passed away I found it in his his house, picked it up and started reading it. My dad was a WWII buff which we had in common. The book is very engaging.
Admirals Raeder and Donitz did not receive death sentences because Admiral Chester Nimitz USN offered a letter acknowledging the Pacific Fleet was ordered to conduct unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan. So that as a war crime was off the table.
Not really, they convicted him for unrestricted submarine warfare. Why he spent 20 years in Spandau prison. The USN was never punished for its role in unrestricted submarine warfare, however.
Part 2 These trials are without example in modern history, except may be Stalins trials against his old communist friends and most generals. Poor justice but mostly a revenge against enemies. THAT'S WHY UP TO OUR DAYS THE US DON'T ACCEPT AN INTERNATIONAL COURT pursuing violations of international law. For not being misunderstood: I accept a lot of death penalties against Nazi leaders. But what, s about Hiroshima and Dresden, allied atrocities against civilians of enemy nations which anyway were short before total defeat and surrender?
I think it's important to note that Speer was generally lauded by Hitler for his designs earlier on in the war as an achitect (before he worked with arms). Speer headed multi-million dollar projects, and Hitler effectively gave him a blank check to create new landmarks for a new world power, in his mind. As an achitect, this mustve been massively addictive for speers, being able to really have a free mind creatively in his designs- not limited in finance at all. How many people would willingly walk away from their dream job like that?
So true. I notice there are very few likes on this statement, but, by God, does the knowledge of Chinese slave labor used by Apple put a dent in iPhone sales in 2022? Speer just put that misery out of his mind, as many, many "enlightened" folks today would do if it meant advancing their careers -- and fattening their paychecks.
Honestly people tend to forget that the jewish slave labour wasnt too far from the life of the average steel or factory worker in europe, especially considering it was war time. He had much less restraint in that regard to use a workforce already available. Although horribly wrong, while his wrongness was blatant, it wasnt so far as we might think from the life of any other factory worker under war time
Speer was a very good Bullshit artist. That's what saved his life. He kept it up for the rest of his life. He would have gone far in politics in the United states.
Lol, Ikr? I could literally imagine the Speed Presidency, not some American Nazi State, but Speer as a typical President yet someone who knows rather well how to play the game.
i‘m not sure about speer....he sounds honest. and in stating his own guilt i think there‘s some true remorse. and as he‘s stated he indeed has got guilt just for being with them and doing this notorious speech. but honestly there are some real sadists like some of the ss-commandants of concentration camps or ss-officers doing hunts after families including the little ones to send them to the extermination camps who never got caught like alois brunner or others who are directly responsible and to an extensive part through their own hands for thousands of murders. alois brunner for instance has done an interview in syria in the eighties and showed absolutely no remorse. instead he said to the interviewer that he should be thankful to him that he cleansed some big cities in europe of the jews. many of the real huge monsters got never caught because they could flee. if you research for such people and recognise what they were able to do to the people face to face then sometimes i get sick and disgusted. speer is really one of the kindest and small fries regarding that issue. there were doctors in the camps like mengele or ari heim who, when inmates came to them to look for some spot on their skin, told them they would remove it, fixed them on a bed, but afterwards disemboweled them in reality while they were alive. one of them also murdered disabled or weak people, cut their head off and would hang them on some pole within the camp to warn the inmates off. they sent babies and little children to the gas chambers. lately i‘ve watched some really hard stuff with survivors as the interviewed with all their emotions and tears in their eyes and i had to stop recently for my own sake.
by the way, listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
I've read Speer's memoir and a good way to look at him is like a Talleyrand - effectively a flexible opportunist who would thrive in any regime. No doubt he was a hard worker, but was also very sharp at understanding people around him (i.e. quick at sensing people's opinions and moods), very diplomatic (i.e. polite, deferential when necessary, didn't bully his staff), so that most people who met him really liked him and thought him a relatively pleasant guy. Doenitz strikes me as a soldier who refused to countenance any criticism of his government, and would likely have seen otherwise as being 'dishonourable' no matter the circumstances, something highly valued by Hitler. We know he was less of a political animal thanks to the memories of Erich Raeder, who was more astute in many ways but couldn't help criticising the regime when it was clearly going batshit crazy in many areas of operations during the war. Hence Raeder being pushed out and Doenitz being named as the Reich's successor president. It's good we can do this analysis when the powers that be let all information be opened up, and not held back to 'protect' us :)
Not if the Democrats have anything to say about it… They’ve managed to drum up such a fuss over even children’s books through institutional control of media, news outlets, and education, that six Dr. Seuss books were able to be canceled via public pressure on their publisher.
I don't think they are saying even the slightest truth. hitler had said about concentration camps. he explains it one of his speeches that ' concentration camps where by britsh to kill thousands of boer woman and children, yes we use it as well for different purpose. hitler's words
Good interviews! Speer has always interested me because of all the Nazis, he was the only one who really understood what was going to happen to any official left alive after Germany surrendered. At Nuremberg, he accepted partial responsibility as collective guilt-some say to avoid being prosecuted for his involvement in the use of slave labor, deftly throwing Fritz Sauckel under the bus by declaring he merely declared his manpower needs and assumed Sauckel would have seen to the welfare of these laborers as it was his responsibility. It was said you could hear Sauckel gasp as he realized Speer had just condemned him for the deaths of all the laborers involved. There was no way Speer could not have known about the condition and treatment of labor because it had to be factored into all of his production estimates. Sauckel was hanged, Speer did 20 years and although he represented himself as one that was being a martyr for the German people, he had no doubt hoped for a lighter sentence. He was lucky- the Soviets wanted him hung. An architect that wanted to design and build. If he had not come to the attention of Hitler we would have never heard of him. His downfall was, by his own admission, the thrill of the power chase. I think he came to enjoy the struggles with other high ranking Nazis over power and prestige. Doenitz strikes me as the typical Military Politician. And in Nazi Germany, you had to be well versed in political maneuvering to keep any sort of favor with Hitler and the High Command. He made use of whatever he could get, as his real mission was to prosecute naval warfare by any means at any time. He used the system and seems surprised when it turned on him. As for his anti-jewish sentiments, he could have simply said that is was the 'party line' and he thought nothing of it then and apologized for it. But having given his oath to Hitler he still has a hard time breaking it, even though he knows he is expected to denounce Hitler and all the 'bad' Nazis while attempting to rationalize his own actions and statements. He seems puzzled at his treatment and subsequent imprisonment. If he had been in the American or British Navy they would have named a new aircraft carrier after him. Or imagine the Doenitz class submarine! But any competent or even slightly successful officer would have been villainized and held responsible regardless of his conduct of the war in 1946. Not only was he convicted of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, and as proof of his complicity, it was argued he had over 100 meetings with Hitler about the navy. Doenitz said, "How in heaven's name could a commander-in-chief of a service responsible directly to the Head of the State, have fulfilled his duties in any other way?" He wasn't the only one to advocate unrestricted submarine warfare.
Small but significant correction: Dönitz was charged with crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity but was convicted only of crimes against peace and war crimes.
Interesting points Claud, although its worth adding the perspective that Fritz Sauckel was member 1395 in the Nazi Party, having joined in 1923. He was there for the whole ride. That's not excusing Speer, of course, who joined them in 1931.
All I can say is that these interviews once again proof that Speer is a very clever and intelligent man. And intellect can be a very dangerous thing when it is applied to the wrong side of humanitarian ethics.
The British prosecutors had planned to charge Karl Doenitz with regards to his contravening a 1936 international treaty relating to the use of U-boats during war. But these charges were not put forward on the request of the US prosecutors. It was later confirmed that the US had contravened the same protocols, and thought that Doenitz's defence may have raised this point and embarrass them..
Was looking for this comment Indeed, the US figured they were as guilty of unrestricted submarine warfare as the Germans and Japanese It's one of the few cases in which the allies 'looked at their own' This might have worked (on a certain level) for Goering's defense as well, when it came to indiscriminate bombings of non-strategic targets, if of course, he hadn't committed suicide
If Speer were a NAZI Rocketeer like Wehner vonBraun and the other Reich scientists the USA deemed valuable , Speer would have been living in Houston and been heroized for beating the USSR to the moon. However , it seems that Speer and Donetz were beneficiaries of the Allied mission to present the Nuremburg Kangaroo Show Time Court as unbiased and evenhanded; by granting mitigated leniency to SOME of the fallen German government's operatives.
Also,the USA partnered with fascist governments as a foil to the greater threat at that time, which was the very RED USSR. Hitler and General Franco , who won USA support during the Spanish Civil War , were tacit partners of the USA and Free Market Europe, in their quest to defend free market capitalism against the Communist Red Tide.
I could see Doenitz as having the least knowledge of any of the inner circle about the camps. It's strangely comical that he was left holding the bag for it all.
Hhhhmmmm. Looks like those poor people are without food and medical supplies thanks to the indiscriminate and illegal bombing/strafing of German supply lines. And, just possibly, may have contracted typhus (the war disease.) I also love the hostile interrogation from the interviewer. Just don't ask about Dresden.
@@huntmatthewd two points about this: 1. Conditions had always been terrible in the camps and even worse in the extermination camps 2. Germany started the bombing of civilians, the allies reacted with bombardments of their own
Dönitz (in his favour) was only interested in being a soldier not a politician...you can see that when he talks...is like he is thinking 💭 "Let me go back to command line instead of this rubbish and boring 💤 😃 interview"... 😊
At least here, Speer comes across as being the most truthful and thoughtful in his truthfulness. Those in positions of authority enjoy this quality because they are constantly lied to and in my life I have found this to be the way of getting out of trouble. Lying to people with a mountain of evidence in front of them will only harden their resolve against you.
Steve Chernoski , you mean 'inside the third Reich '?.... i feel Speer may well have 'cheated the hangman' but his knowledge & availability for interview made him an ideal person to explain 'the realities' of a totalitarian system & how 'logical decent educated people' could become part of an illogical murderous regime
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
@@theenglishalpinist5031 I agree too. I don't believe him innocent, but neither totally guilty. Like most wars and the people in it, its an ugly shade of gray.
When you separate art from artist (with some exceptions) you will enjoy things alot more, for example the M35 helmet design is AWESOME, but its past makes it politically unfeasible to be used most places. And even though I know the kind of horrors that they may have been used in I can't help but love my Japanese rifle collection.
@takethisyousob ich habe dieses video schon gesehen,und jemand spricht darüber sie wollten nach dem krieg deutschland zerstören ,aber das haben sie nicht geschaft weil die deutschen großartige Leute sind. Lang lebe Deutschland
@@bougrineyuba3253 don't hold it against the European Americans of today. Plenty of us recognize the crimes of our government. We'll all make it right soon.
Speer was an opportunistic liar in my opinion, while Doenitz comes across as an honourable serviceman. He was in charge f the navy, what else is he going to do when ordered to attack? He’d have done the same Job regardless of who was in power. Under him U boats attempted to rescue survivors until the allies attacked them while they were doing so.
still the things that he did or didn’t do about the holocaust are horrible - however he said it in this video and I’ve heard it from one of my grandpa’s friends who was drawn into the marine he really didn’t judge jews and punished people who acted oddly towards people of jewish origin. Speer can burn in hell tho - tries to save himself in his older statements and push everything he did onto Hitler even tho he was one of the worst war criminals of all time
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
I do not like the cut that they did at 3:30. Doenitz seems to start that part by saying that detaining people is not against the laws of war, and making detained people work is also not against the laws of war, and I feel like he is building up to says, but mass execution was a war crime, but then they cut it off there and transition to someone else.
@@warwolf715 Well assuming a precise story was told, a dealbreaker in an interview like that, why would they cut it out? It would just make an interview more interesting. I'd say it's unlikely
thilgu ... And to throw a perhaps wholly different log or twig or some in-between combustible on the fire, what are we to make of Michael Cohen? Different time different place different almost everything. Yet historic events maybe do in reality exist in some kind of 3-D space, with certain events and actors and actions closer together, more comparable, culpable, in one space or quadrant, and others, significantly farther apart. Also with very different degrees of intensity, both in terms of quantity and quality, of infliction of harm and suffering ... as well as to whom, by whom, and for what reason. History, human action, rationalization, all present the possibility of these many different judgements or discernments. And as well, of course, by force of mind, culture, or happenstance, the appearance sometimes of hardly any judgements, discernment, or consequences at all. If this seems hard - not always easy to make distinctions - I think it is. Hard to make judgments. Hard to conduct oneself in life, in competition, and most gravely in politics and war. Yet, must we not strive to understand, to properly navigate, to engineer, to lead our lives. Must we not continue to wrestle with, to struggle, with questions of responsibility and repentance? To continue somehow to try and safeguard life and truth and at least some evolving sense of human justice and decency when we can? There is not one easy answer, but like obscenity, perhaps if we open our hearts, we may find, in the varied circumstances of our lives, and at some deep level of instruction and conscience we find ourselves immersed in, what seems right, and what wrong. What actions we humans should or should not do, or even be a party to, and why? This drama continues as we work out our own new sets of challenging issues in this rivalrous, nuclear-tipped, slow-burn climate-change threatened, current pandemic-racked world.
@@dodibenabba1378 Well it's definitely not nonsense nor meaningless, but certainly not the easiest to read. Sometimes you need a lot of words to really put forth an idea properly, or otherwise with fewer words it would be too open to interpretation. And of course, this reads like discourse, taking the reader on a journey through his thought instead of plainly stating it.
There is a wrong translation at 8:18 where Speer said "Lagebesprechung" which translates to something like "situation meeting". His words seem to be misheard as "Lager-Besprechungen" which would be translated as "camp discussions". It suggests there were discussions about camps, but he talks about something else. Edit: Ah! I see @nPianoRun already pointed it out.
@Olivia Dove Of course, no one ever mishears or mistranslates a member of the Master Race, except deliberately , to cover up the fact that they never committed a crime.
@Dean Keepers Even if the source is sketchy i just did a quick search to prove how easy is to find allied war crimes, there are a lot more results and sources.
@@saltycrotchwhiff3946 You never learned about the German Nazi's at school? It's not like Dønitz and Speers opinion or story is worthy to be teached at school either😂
@@mayaburak93 You should read the most recent biography on Speer. In the sixties he was allowed to re-write his nazi past and erase a lot of the dark manner in which he managed to reach the highest echolons of the nazi party....
Thanks so much for sharing this! I've been to countless museums and seen hours of documentaries on TV for twenty years and yet never have I seen such long uninterrupted interviews with Speer and Dönitz. I found it very interesting to hear Speer's reflections on how ambition in your job can make you forget the bigger picture. He seemed to genuinely want people to learn from his mistake of being too absorbed in being a good employee. This was the same points that Hanna Arendt made about Adolf Eichmann and I think it shows us some fundamental psychological traits of human nature that we don't necessarily approve of, but is just there in our genetic code. Being aware of it and fighting it whenever it comes to the surface is what we should learn from these war criminals I think.
They wanted to hand Doenitz for the unlimited submarine warfare, but the US Navy intervened to advocate a prison sentence for him because US naval officials were rather uncomfortable at the idea of executing someone for practicing unlimited submarine warfare as the US had also done against the Japanese.
@@williammerkel1410 Yes.. The business at Versailles where everything was blamed on the Germans as if the French or British never fired a shell that did any damage to anything during the war. The first thing a social worker will do when there is a severe domestic problem is to try and establish the idea that fights always involve the roles of two people. The wife that is constantly beaten persists in contributing to the problem by either not shooting the jerk she married or leaving him, etc. Did the allies have the god given right to kill Germans while Germans could only commit serious war crimes? It seemed so to the Germans. It was like a couple of three year olds arguing over a toy.
@@williamyoung9401 Not really, he probably laughed inwards when he thought about the fact that the West would sooner or later become what we see today.
My respect for Admiral Doenitz has only gone up after watching this. He seems to be an honorable and straightforward man. The Allies may have won the Naval war, but it came at a devastating price.
I can't agree tbh. Doenitz is evading all the questions asked by the interviewer. He knew about everything and is making up excuses during the whole interview. Nothing straightforward about that in my opinion.
@@mace11880 Yes true he may have had his compulsions just like anybody else serving their country for the right or wrong reasons. The British, French, Dutch committed a lot of atrocities during their colonial rule, some even worse than what the Nazis did. Nobody seems to have a problem with that. WW2 basically gave the Allies a taste of their own medicine.
When Speer speaks so easily and candidly after he had served his time, it is clear that the Nuremburg trial was a relief to him, allowing him to express his true feelings. He wasn't the only person "Inside the Third Reich."
It's been said that luckily Albert Speer was spared on part that he was a good looking man. My conclusion is that he was a vary smart and well spoken man, Karl Doenitz was as well.
No, he was not a genius. HIs world view was too limited, and he had no vision. What one calls a genius is someone like Einstein, who ironically, and no doubt would have been to Hitler's displeasure, was a Jew.
Gitta Sereny's book on Speer is the best analysis of him I have seen. She spent many weeks with him and his family while researching her book. Impossible to summarise in a few words, but basically she concluded he was in self-denial about his guilt. His is a classic case of the dangers of being flattered by someone with power, i.e. Hitler. Speer's flattered ego led him to take the path he did, and having gone down such a path, and been successful, even with the knowledge of what was happening (despite his denials) there was no turning back. In other circumstances, he would probably simply have been a moderately successful architect and family man.
A newly discovered letter by Adolf Hitler's architect and armaments minister Albert Speer offers proof that he knew about the plans to exterminate the Jews, despite his repeated claims to the contrary. Writing in 1971 to Hélène Jeanty, the widow of a Belgian resistance leader, Speer admitted that he had been at a conference where Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS and Gestapo, had unveiled plans to exterminate the Jews in what is known as the Posen speech. Speer's insistence that he had left before the end of the meeting, and had therefore known nothing about the Holocaust, probably spared him from execution after the Nuremberg trials at the end of the second world war. It helped earn him the name of "the good Nazi" and the image of a genius architect who had misguidedly slipped into Nazi circles to further his career. Instead of facing death as many top Nazis did, Speer served 20 years in prison, mainly for using slave labour.
@@st0ox of course I was sarcastic with my comment. There was no chance for that and you can make a strong case that apart from gas chambers USSR was no different than Third Reich when it comes to conquered nations (just ask Poles, Ukrainians and so on).
@@Schyderap I think there was one mayor difference though. The Germans were very organized in systematically killing people with a specific background (Not just talking about the elephant in the room here, for example also Roma or disabled persons). They also had an ideology that was wrong on so many levels, but kinda justified their mass murder. The USSR on the other hand was much more chaotic and random in the killing. Of course they had probably the most successful intelligence organisation in the world* and were effective in killing so called enemies of they state, but they also killed so much more people purely random. * Stalingrad and the Bomb...you cannot top that. Maybe Alan Turing can top that if he had more time in his life and another mayor war to crack another enigma like thing or build an army of androids or something.
@@Schyderap I am Pole, sorry but, comparing 30 000 executed millitary men and a couple hundred dead in 40 years of Polish communist rule to 3 million murdered thanks to the Nazi is pretty stupid and offending, this kind of symetrism doesn't make you seem smart. One side wanted 90% of Polish population death, rest as slaves, the other wanted to establish communism even if it mean killing innocents or critics of the system
@@st0ox It wasn't random, enemies of power were profiled in the perseccussions. Your opinion reminds me of this satiric video ruclips.net/video/0wnkGUk_KHE/видео.html
Savchenkov1 I know it sounds bad but it’s kind of shocking just how smart he was. The Americans were stunned at the level of detail he was able to recall after the war. Good or bad he had an exceptionally interesting existence.
@@jeremyheintz1479 but morally speaking from objective of the allied powers, shouldn't they all be hung or in prison? So the killing of jews only matters to make a point, but behind the scenes its business as usual
Yes, or as Heinrich Heine put it: 'thoughts preceed action, as lightning precedes the thunder." Had his cautions to his fellow Germans in the 1820s been listened to, none of this would ever have happened. He was right about book-burning, and he was right about the inherent, Germanic love of militarism being tempered only by a thin veneer of christianity. He predicted a scene in Germany far worse than the mindless savagery of the French Revolution.
This is a gem. To understand history we need interviews like this of the key high ranking Nazi officials to understand their mindsets. Dönitz seems to be distancing himself from his Nazi past. I wonder why? Lol
Speer was lucky to avoid the death penalty, he was heavily involved in slave labour, and yes he did try to improve the conditions for some slaves, it was only in the name of efficiency. So many people died under slave labour, he must avoided the rope because he cooperated.
He survived cos he blamed Sauckel, who wrongly hung. Speer was pure evil, like Hitler and Himmler. Above probably all of them bar Goering, at the main Nuremburg trial he deserved hanging.
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
To be completely honest, I was genuinely starting to believe in the beginning that Speer, even though I already knew of his crimes, was actually an alright person. Of course I broke out of it, because I realized that's stupid, but it's honestly no wonder that that man escaped the noose he well deserved
@@rlm2933 what you mean good? do you know what that means?! Theodr Hertz the imposter is not even Joz they stole somebody land over a big fat lie these people are not joz who established Israel and ruling over palestine and jewish agency controling the world they ain't Jews
He obviously liked the media attention and he was smart enough to understand the importance of the media and how he could use it for his own purpose ie to project a more positive image and distinguish himself from the other nazis in order to preserve his legacy. He worked hard to regain some respectability and he, undoubtedly, was served by his elegant, well-spoken, poised public persona.
I've always regarded Doenitz as a military officer and of no blame. I have read a lot about Speer and concluded that he was not an evil person but was very ambitious. Speer only thought about Speer and nothing else. I do blame him a bit because about the time of his illness he knew full well what was happening with the Jews, I know he didn't like it, but he was given a chance to resign because of his health and he didn't take it. Because of his ambition he still wanted to stay near the top of that evil regime .I blame him for that.
@@user-xq4st9ie7r That Number is from a Book by a female jewish Author. And it is 6 Millions, not Billions in there. Wikipedia quotes her as the Source of the 6 Millions. The Red Cross at the Time had stated something like 2 Millions which is much more believable. This is in the same Line as in the 80s it was said WW2 had cost 50 to 55 Million Lives and today they inflated the Number to 76 Million Lives. The Reason behind this is to make the Crime looking bigger than it was to make todays Crimes looking smaller.
brilliant, such a massive contrast between both gentlemen. thank you as we should never forget the people behind the history no matter the horror of it.
I must say that's the most beautifully spoken German I have ever listen to. Even with my rusty language skills it's crystal clear. If only they all sounded like that.
Speer was an opportunistic chameleon, always willing to change based on the way the wind blew. That last statement with the little chuckle at the end is evil that chills to the bone.
Saying you're glad you didn't get executed is evil? I'll admit the phrasing came off weird but wouldn't anyone be thinking that? The difference is that Speer said it. If he's an opportunist, he's not very good at it since he seems to be openly admitting it. And a 100% opportunist will never let people think they're an opportunist.
@@saltycrotchwhiff3946 Exactly! Very much a German type of humor. ..and the editor's decision to end the video right at that moment was a technique to illicit a certain reaction from the viewer.
7/2024: Good Day From The Future. I did just subscribe. I have seen Speer several times in videos, but never Admiral Karl Doenitz. WoW. Living History. (a thought comes to mind; "Operation Paperclip"... ) This is excellent. Very Educational and Interesting Thank You & Best Regards.
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
Revealing when Speer talking during his private movies says something to the extent that all the top families hung out together in a way I would imagine the Mafia families would . Insightful !
It's terribly worrying that many viewers who commented here say that they see Doenitz as a stand up honest military man, after having heard him state that he didn't know "what had gone on before" and that if he had, "he'd have said the opposite". This, after a decade of hundreds of thousands of people in Germany and in the territories occupied by the German invasions had been daily marched out of their neighborhoods and homes, and over time, placed on trains and shipped away en masse, and after his own severely antisemitic speech making. The claim "I never permitted the slightest injustice against any person of Jewish origin" as commander of the Navy is not believable nor even possible given the laws he was carrying out, (and those being broken), in acts of violence against all the peoples of Europe, and given the speeches and meetings of the leadership he attended and worked in. I see eagerness to believe the claims of Nazi true believers who rose to the highest level of power in the Nazi regime to oversee war and murder against every population the military were able to reach. This willingness to believe their claims was not acceptable only a very few short years ago. We can take this as a piece of evidence of resurgent Fascism.
I always think about 4-5 Bengalis starved to death by Churchill. Thats Bengal alone. When i think of 6-7 Million Ukranians slaughtered and starved to death by Stalin in 1932, it gives me the shivers. Thats Ukraine alone. Poland went full-blown Nationalistic, aggressing every bordering Nation, trying to create a pure white blonde blue eyed slawic polish race.. on neighbouring territory. Was it a better world when half of Europe was stuck in Gulags and Communist/Bolschewik Dictatorship? And since when is Colonialism, the most racist cancer in the world, a good thing? Ever notice that the Germans bever fought against Africans, Asians, Arabs and Hindus? Why did Germany only fight against the Supre,e-White-Colonial-Power and Communism?
@@germaniatv1870 the Bengal Famine wasn't intentional. It was the result of food from the region being shipped away for use by soldiers and blockades from Japan which made resupplying the region difficult. I don't know what you're yapping about with Poland "trying to create a pure white blonde blue eyed slawic polish race." Yes, Eastern Europe under the Soviet Union was awful, but saying that it's worse than what the Nazis would've done is outright moronic. Germans did fight against Africans. They colonized Tanganyika, Togo, Rwanda, Burundi, and Namibia. "And since when is Colonialism, the most racist cancer in the world, a good thing?" That's literally what WWII was about. The Nazis in their own words said that the Volga River would be their Mississippi river, where Germans would flock towards to start farms. I sincerely hope you're just a troll, because there's no way an actual human being could possibly be this dumb.
I am thankful that those survived and were able to tell their stories, whether they are believable or not. Thats much more useful to us younger generations than any german high command staff that was executed as punishment after the war.
15:28 "Long before the Jews were murdered, it had all been expressed in my buildings". Amazing that Speer was so forthcoming. That can't have been easy to say.
Well, unfortunately for him there is one ultimate justice that nobody escapes. Not all sins always go unpunished in this life, but they certainly don't go unpunished after this one.
@@darthroden Oh shut the fuck up, stop talking about an eventual afterlife like if know something, you ain't know shit about it, nobody ever came back from "there" to tell anything to anybody !
@@victorscaramanga7329 Ah and there is the inevitable atheist fascist response whenever someone mentioned the idea of an afterlife. Almost like clockwork. LOL!
I teach voice-over and narration and have always wondered how Karl Donitz's voice sounded in conversation, having never heard it. I had guessed a voice sort of high and somewhat thin, with a certain lack of tonality. I was correct. Whereas Speer was a high baritone to low alto, Donitz was a mid soprano.
The final part.... He was much more attractive, inteligent and appealing, which gave the jury the benefit of the doubt... "Well, if that's what gave me the advantage for the 20 years prison sentence then i am happy that i made this positive impression" What a sentence....
With subdued flair and energy at the right time, he took over the world with intelligence, charm... you don't want to hurt that man and he knew he came across that way
@@3345-p9g If you call it truncheon or blackjack, you realize it didn't just have a ceremonial function. Having seen with my own eyes the American MPs at work between 1945 and 1954 (and the Italian police even after), I can assure you that it is very effective in "maintaining order".
@@sergiogregorat1830 Yes but unlikley they were glong to kick off and fight there way out of the building😂 I know they can be good enforcers Im frok Plymouth the Royal Navys reguators(police) are nicknamed crushers because of when they are required to maintain order in pubs clubs and bars that sailors swarm to and start fights...
Doenitz was an honourable man. "Like firing on lifeboats." "Exactly, that was out of the question for us." Same goes to Rommel, when he disobeyed the commando code from Hitler. Even admired the SAS, and Commando regiments for their accomplishments.
Royal navy submariners machine gunned shipwrecked german crews on Mediterranian on two occasions, captain Miers was given a reprimand, nothing more. Still the allies had got the nerve to accuse Dönitz of their own kind of foul play. The full coverege of these incident was written on the log book of HMS Torbay., the RN submarine. Miers should have been accused at Nuremberg.
Maybe the admiral didn't know what was actually happening in the camps. We interned thousands of Japanese Americans during ww2 in camps and a lot of Americans didn't or still don't know they existed.
There is a significant difference between an admiral and a common soldier. I cant prove that Dönitz knew of what was going on in the Deathcaps, but I dont believe him when he denies to know anything. A common soldier, like my great grandfather, I could believe that they didnt know what happened and they should still be damned for voting for Hitler, not standing up when they rounded up the jews, participated in looting jewish buildings and fighting in this war.
@@CBeatty59 We will never forget what you did to our german soldiers after the war. "Your not prisoners but merley not weaponized enemies". This a fucking joke,with your hole "clean" and "liberator" bullshit piss off
@@noranqey Not sure if german or not, but: Junge, du solltest dich erstmal um den eigenen Dreck am Stecken kümmern bevor du irgendwem vorwirfst etwas nie vergeben zu können. In general (also to @Claudette Branchard): It is without debate, that the US-Army commited warcrimes against german soldiers and never proseucuted the perpetrators, but the victims of those (confirmable) acts rank in the low hundreds. If you are using these cases to distract from nazi war crimes, we should really question what your motives are @noranqe
This is a very interresting interview. A Trial is a Show, and Speer understood that from the very beginning, and he got 20 years. But Dönitz didnt. He got ten years. Dönizts played his cards in a lousy way. There is one more thing and that is, if Göring not being so arrogant, mabye they wouldnt hang him. The way I see it, the only man who played his cards well were Albert Speer. I do beleive that Göring could have got away with 20-30 years, or mabye life, but his arrogance destroyed it for him. This Trial is a very interresting part of history.
A bit of a unfortunate mistranslation at 8:18. Lage=situation instead of Lager=camp.
That would mean the daily situation conferences at Führer Headquarters then?
@@michaeldorosh5047 Presumably
makes more sense
Or... Lager = Beer ;)
Thank you
I'm pretty sure Donitz and his interviewer are yelling because Donitz was losing his hearing
Huh?
@C.S.Allen we talk like that lol
Yea true Ig I was also wondering what was up with his voice, as he was a navy admiral general so I thought his voice would've been extremely stern and manly.
@C.S.Allen Lol
@C.S.Allen I am not too sure though, that the interviewer actually was german. He had some strange accent.
Interviewing controversial figures and letting them finish their sentences? A different time.
controversial is the islamic cleric or the fire and brim preacher ,these people here werent just controversial figures my friend,these were some of the last survivors of what many people regard as evil personified on this earth,they were allowed to finish because everytime they spoke more was learned of there thinking,actions and ultimatley crimes. for comparrison when the Israelis captured eichman they interview him for 9 months, 3500 pages of transcripts and still didnt get everything out of him. every little snippet was sought becuase people want to understand what made them do it
Well, We Let "President" Trump Talk His $#%& Everyday... ;-)
@@dougauzene8389 yeah to teach the next generation what happens when you put a moron in charge of something important!
Only fascists do not let people finish their sentences.
Actually, interrupting someone and pressing him with the absurdity of their lies can sometimes be the only way to stop someone from spreading propaganda. I'm not saying it's ideal, I'm not saying it's pleasant, but sometimes it's the only way left to go. Take a guy like Vladimir Putin, if you just listen to him and don't question what he says, he appears to be a very well intended individual whose right about pretty much everything. However, a significant number of his actions are completely opposed to what he preaches. Unfortunately, the guy is a fascist and doesn't mind killing journalists, so you very rarely have admitting to the terrible actions he committed and still commits. So, while I hate how people always talk over each other nowadays, I also have to say that I hate being served bullshit. The thing is, a guy like Putin, as cruel as he is, is not an idiot. The man has horrible values, but he's bright and that's a problem.
This is perfect to understand why and how Speer got off. He knew how to sell his "not good but not that bad either guy " act
he played his part for the media circus show trials.
exactly. The perfect sales job. The guy is a snake
@@Toro_Da_Corsa Not just him, many other Nazi officials. Wernher von Braun, an SS officer who frequently used Jewish slave labor, also weasled himself out of punishment by changing his allegiance. Many Jews never saw justice and their oppressors were let go.
He was the only high ranked Nazi that acknowledged the Holocaust and the Nazi scheme and showed regret. He was a valuable witness against people with more influence and responsibility. Speer was an architect (for buildings) and also in charge of logistical concerns late war, if I'm not mistaken. He wasn't a big fish in the scheme of the responsibility. Or, at least, as big a fish as the people he would be testifying against.
Yea he played the game very well, if I didn't know enything about him I would of said he was a gentleman, very level headed I have to say but a complete hypocrite
What surprises me is not Speer, Speer is as calculated as you'd expect. Dönitz surprised me. Because he answered in the way an admiral would - utilitarian and almost distanced, but with a sort of surpressed regret. Fascinating to watch.
People of the sea have their own way
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
He sounded far more in denial than anything.
Didnt hear a single bit of regret from Doenitz. He evaded all questions and came up with dumb excuses during the whole interview. Afterall a nazi with no regrets whatsoever
@@mace11880 that’s the impression I got as well. Still blinded by the ideology even into his old age, which is surprising because Hitler turned down his offer numerous times for more U Boats early in the war
There's a funny story in Doenitz's memoirs about when he first got appointed as Hitler's successor. Himmler came to see him with some SS guys and Doenitz said he hid a pistol on his desk under some papers because he wasn't sure what was going to happen.
Joshua Dausch LOL!
Joshua Dausch ---- I recall reading somewhere that about that time, German civil and military groups were vying with each other for prominence and there were quite a number of secret bump-offs.
Speer says in his memoir that there were attempts by Himmler to bump him off and hints that some other senior figures in the hierarchy such as Todt were assassinated via such methods as mysterious plane crashes (he said that the planes had self destruct device that was likely activated) or in his case giving him the wrong medical treatment
Funny, or chilling? Such pervasive fear may have been why so many top leaders who may have otherwise spoke out against the extermination camps, instead kept quiet.
from various readings from that period, I gleaned that murderism was not confined to the enemy
Just checking the comment section to see what the historians have to say.
cool story bro
and now I can't wait to know what you will eat tomorrow at dinner!
@@fullenergika No, in actuality we're all dying to know what's for dinner for you!
haha..good one.
Yami
You had to edit that comment to get it out correctly? :))
God forbid that ordinary people express opinions about history.
Speer was part of Rudolf Hess's eyebrow gang
yawn
... and both, Hess and Speer, were Hitler's homosexual desire, who did guide his politics from the background.
LOL
@@VeraMaier makes no sense
@@sdsd2e2321 Sorry, better now: ... and both, Hess and Speer, were Hitler's homosexual secret lovers, who did guide his politics from the background. ... but this is my theory... Hoever, fact is, that an uneducated lazy man who does not understand anything can make plans for the development of a big modern country. Hitler was pampered by many: Getting army training as propagandist, anti-semitist, anti-bolshevist etc., getting lifestyle advise from USA-adviser, Hanfstengl, getting speaker training, propaganda photographers, filmmakers, a huge government staff,
Regardless of what we think about these men, and what they did or didn't know, you can't deny that it's absolutely fascinating to watch these interviews, and some remarkable journalism.
Since you find it fascinating and engaging may i humbly suggest you read Speer's Spandau The Secret Diaries and his 2nd book Inside The Third Reich. I promise you you will be utterly engaged and unable to put them down until you finish them. I just read Spandau again . Its 450 pages did not bore me for one minute . Speer has a very fluid engaging way of writing combined with some dry wit .
@@robertmanfredthurrigl9424 Agreed! I am reading it now. When I was taking care of my father's affairs this January after he passed away I found it in his his house, picked it up and started reading it. My dad was a WWII buff which we had in common. The book is very engaging.
Admirals Raeder and Donitz did not receive death sentences because Admiral Chester Nimitz USN offered a letter acknowledging the Pacific Fleet was ordered to conduct unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan. So that as a war crime was off the table.
Not really, they convicted him for unrestricted submarine warfare. Why he spent 20 years in Spandau prison. The USN was never punished for its role in unrestricted submarine warfare, however.
@@wokehumanist958 well he and raeder were pretty big nazis
Good to know this. The trials against Doenitz and other leading persons in the military, economy and administration
Part 2
These trials are without example in modern history, except may be Stalins trials against his old communist friends and most generals. Poor justice but mostly a revenge against enemies. THAT'S WHY UP TO OUR DAYS THE US DON'T ACCEPT AN INTERNATIONAL COURT pursuing violations of international law. For not being misunderstood: I accept a lot of death penalties against Nazi leaders. But what, s about Hiroshima and Dresden, allied atrocities against civilians of enemy nations which anyway were short before total defeat and surrender?
@@rudolfkraffzick642 They were not short before unconditional surrender
I think it's important to note that Speer was generally lauded by Hitler for his designs earlier on in the war as an achitect (before he worked with arms). Speer headed multi-million dollar projects, and Hitler effectively gave him a blank check to create new landmarks for a new world power, in his mind. As an achitect, this mustve been massively addictive for speers, being able to really have a free mind creatively in his designs- not limited in finance at all. How many people would willingly walk away from their dream job like that?
So true. I notice there are very few likes on this statement, but, by God, does the knowledge of Chinese slave labor used by Apple put a dent in iPhone sales in 2022? Speer just put that misery out of his mind, as many, many "enlightened" folks today would do if it meant advancing their careers -- and fattening their paychecks.
Honestly people tend to forget that the jewish slave labour wasnt too far from the life of the average steel or factory worker in europe, especially considering it was war time. He had much less restraint in that regard to use a workforce already available. Although horribly wrong, while his wrongness was blatant, it wasnt so far as we might think from the life of any other factory worker under war time
Too true!
me. i would have fled as fast as i could
@@gabrielepasserini6860 stupid answer. Compare death rate beetwen jews in the concentration camps and the aryan steel workers in germany.
Speer was a very good Bullshit artist. That's what saved his life. He kept it up for the rest of his life. He would have gone far in politics in the United states.
Lol, Ikr? I could literally imagine the Speed Presidency, not some American Nazi State, but Speer as a typical President yet someone who knows rather well how to play the game.
Absolutely right. Speer would made a good CEO - firing tousands of workers and sell this as "regeneration".
and every other country.....
i‘m not sure about speer....he sounds honest. and in stating his own guilt i think there‘s some true remorse. and as he‘s stated he indeed has got guilt just for being with them and doing this notorious speech. but honestly there are some real sadists like some of the ss-commandants of concentration camps or ss-officers doing hunts after families including the little ones to send them to the extermination camps who never got caught like alois brunner or others who are directly responsible and to an extensive part through their own hands for thousands of murders. alois brunner for instance has done an interview in syria in the eighties and showed absolutely no remorse. instead he said to the interviewer that he should be thankful to him that he cleansed some big cities in europe of the jews. many of the real huge monsters got never caught because they could flee. if you research for such people and recognise what they were able to do to the people face to face then sometimes i get sick and disgusted. speer is really one of the kindest and small fries regarding that issue. there were doctors in the camps like mengele or ari heim who, when inmates came to them to look for some spot on their skin, told them they would remove it, fixed them on a bed, but afterwards disemboweled them in reality while they were alive. one of them also murdered disabled or weak people, cut their head off and would hang them on some pole within the camp to warn the inmates off. they sent babies and little children to the gas chambers. lately i‘ve watched some really hard stuff with survivors as the interviewed with all their emotions and tears in their eyes and i had to stop recently for my own sake.
by the way, listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
I've read Speer's memoir and a good way to look at him is like a Talleyrand - effectively a flexible opportunist who would thrive in any regime. No doubt he was a hard worker, but was also very sharp at understanding people around him (i.e. quick at sensing people's opinions and moods), very diplomatic (i.e. polite, deferential when necessary, didn't bully his staff), so that most people who met him really liked him and thought him a relatively pleasant guy.
Doenitz strikes me as a soldier who refused to countenance any criticism of his government, and would likely have seen otherwise as being 'dishonourable' no matter the circumstances, something highly valued by Hitler. We know he was less of a political animal thanks to the memories of Erich Raeder, who was more astute in many ways but couldn't help criticising the regime when it was clearly going batshit crazy in many areas of operations during the war. Hence Raeder being pushed out and Doenitz being named as the Reich's successor president.
It's good we can do this analysis when the powers that be let all information be opened up, and not held back to 'protect' us :)
so Speer arctually published memoirs and PROFITTED of his crimes? that's an crime in it of itself!!!
Not if the Democrats have anything to say about it…
They’ve managed to drum up such a fuss over even children’s books through institutional control of media, news outlets, and education, that six Dr. Seuss books were able to be canceled via public pressure on their publisher.
I don't think they are saying even the slightest truth. hitler had said about concentration camps. he explains it one of his speeches that ' concentration camps where by britsh to kill thousands of boer woman and children, yes we use it as well for different purpose. hitler's words
Great analysis, underrated comment!
Os dois eram nazistas convictos, para servir o regime onde faziam parte, faziam de tudo.
Good interviews! Speer has always interested me because of all the Nazis, he was the only one who really understood what was going to happen to any official left alive after Germany surrendered. At Nuremberg, he accepted partial responsibility as collective guilt-some say to avoid being prosecuted for his involvement in the use of slave labor, deftly throwing Fritz Sauckel under the bus by declaring he merely declared his manpower needs and assumed Sauckel would have seen to the welfare of these laborers as it was his responsibility. It was said you could hear Sauckel gasp as he realized Speer had just condemned him for the deaths of all the laborers involved. There was no way Speer could not have known about the condition and treatment of labor because it had to be factored into all of his production estimates. Sauckel was hanged, Speer did 20 years and although he represented himself as one that was being a martyr for the German people, he had no doubt hoped for a lighter sentence. He was lucky- the Soviets wanted him hung. An architect that wanted to design and build. If he had not come to the attention of Hitler we would have never heard of him. His downfall was, by his own admission, the thrill of the power chase. I think he came to enjoy the struggles with other high ranking Nazis over power and prestige.
Doenitz strikes me as the typical Military Politician. And in Nazi Germany, you had to be well versed in political maneuvering to keep any sort of favor with Hitler and the High Command. He made use of whatever he could get, as his real mission was to prosecute naval warfare by any means at any time. He used the system and seems surprised when it turned on him. As for his anti-jewish sentiments, he could have simply said that is was the 'party line' and he thought nothing of it then and apologized for it. But having given his oath to Hitler he still has a hard time breaking it, even though he knows he is expected to denounce Hitler and all the 'bad' Nazis while attempting to rationalize his own actions and statements. He seems puzzled at his treatment and subsequent imprisonment. If he had been in the American or British Navy they would have named a new aircraft carrier after him. Or imagine the Doenitz class submarine! But any competent or even slightly successful officer would have been villainized and held responsible regardless of his conduct of the war in 1946. Not only was he convicted of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, and as proof of his complicity, it was argued he had over 100 meetings with Hitler about the navy. Doenitz said, "How in heaven's name could a commander-in-chief of a service responsible directly to the Head of the State, have fulfilled his duties in any other way?" He wasn't the only one to advocate unrestricted submarine warfare.
Thank you for an very interesting and intelligent posting. We see very little of that in these forums.
Yours is perhaps the best comment in the section. Thanks.
Small but significant correction: Dönitz was charged with crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity but was convicted only of crimes against peace and war crimes.
Interesting points Claud, although its worth adding the perspective that Fritz Sauckel was member 1395 in the Nazi Party, having joined in 1923. He was there for the whole ride.
That's not excusing Speer, of course, who joined them in 1931.
.... wanted him hung? I wish you damn Yanks would learn English. It is HANGED, not hung!
All I can say is that these interviews once again proof that Speer is a very clever and intelligent man.
And intellect can be a very dangerous thing when it is applied to the wrong side of humanitarian ethics.
Oh yes and Dr. Goebbels and Dr. Merkel are not the only ones.
@S H I Ω I N G
If you think that then you are horse shit.
Dönitz lies and tries to get out the situation. Speer on the other hand is so smart, that you dont realise, he also lies to you
Speer's a good con man.
Random Person Nice!
The British prosecutors had planned to charge Karl Doenitz with regards to his contravening a 1936 international treaty relating to the use of U-boats during war. But these charges were not put forward on the request of the US prosecutors. It was later confirmed that the US had contravened the same protocols, and thought that Doenitz's defence may have raised this point and embarrass them..
Was looking for this comment
Indeed, the US figured they were as guilty of unrestricted submarine warfare as the Germans and Japanese
It's one of the few cases in which the allies 'looked at their own'
This might have worked (on a certain level) for Goering's defense as well, when it came to indiscriminate bombings of non-strategic targets, if of course, he hadn't committed suicide
@@Nightdare they all committed "suicide"
markmark63 ICH NICHT TOD!!!
If Speer were a NAZI Rocketeer like Wehner vonBraun and the other Reich scientists the USA deemed valuable , Speer would have been living in Houston and been heroized for beating the USSR to the moon. However , it seems that Speer and Donetz were beneficiaries of the Allied mission to present the Nuremburg Kangaroo Show Time Court as unbiased and evenhanded; by granting mitigated leniency to SOME of the fallen German government's operatives.
Also,the USA partnered with fascist governments as a foil to the greater threat at that time, which was the very RED USSR. Hitler and General Franco , who won USA support during the Spanish Civil War , were tacit partners of the USA and Free Market Europe, in their quest to defend free market capitalism against the Communist Red Tide.
That was fascinating , thank you for making it available .
I could see Doenitz as having the least knowledge of any of the inner circle about the camps. It's strangely comical that he was left holding the bag for it all.
Hhhhmmmm. Looks like those poor people are without food and medical supplies thanks to the indiscriminate and illegal bombing/strafing of German supply lines. And, just possibly, may have contracted typhus (the war disease.)
I also love the hostile interrogation from the interviewer.
Just don't ask about Dresden.
He got to keep his life, and that's more than he deserved.
Have you considered that Dönitz is probably just lieing?
@@huntmatthewd two points about this:
1. Conditions had always been terrible in the camps and even worse in the extermination camps
2. Germany started the bombing of civilians, the allies reacted with bombardments of their own
Dönitz (in his favour) was only interested in being a soldier not a politician...you can see that when he talks...is like he is thinking 💭 "Let me go back to command line instead of this rubbish and boring 💤 😃 interview"... 😊
17:57 to the end. Wow. I read Speer's book, but those lines and the end really made me think. Just be eloquent and judges will be forgiving.
At least here, Speer comes across as being the most truthful and thoughtful in his truthfulness. Those in positions of authority enjoy this quality because they are constantly lied to and in my life I have found this to be the way of getting out of trouble. Lying to people with a mountain of evidence in front of them will only harden their resolve against you.
I was pretty astonished at 15:37.
Steve Chernoski , you mean 'inside the third Reich '?.... i feel Speer may well have 'cheated the hangman' but his knowledge & availability for interview made him an ideal person to explain 'the realities' of a totalitarian system & how 'logical decent educated people' could become part of an illogical murderous regime
Respect, Honesty, Regret. Throw a bit of education (for articulation) and they will go a very, very long way in most courts.
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
Speer fascinates me to no end. Also... not gonna lie... loved his architecture.
Me too. I refuse to believe that guy was evil, at least not in any sense more than any one of us. As such, his commuted sentence was right.
@@theenglishalpinist5031 I agree too. I don't believe him innocent, but neither totally guilty. Like most wars and the people in it, its an ugly shade of gray.
When you separate art from artist (with some exceptions) you will enjoy things alot more, for example the M35 helmet design is AWESOME, but its past makes it politically unfeasible to be used most places. And even though I know the kind of horrors that they may have been used in I can't help but love my Japanese rifle collection.
@@theenglishalpinist5031 He wasn't evil but he was unethical.
@@ANProductionsOfficialChannel he was actively and knowingly using slave labor of people in camps. There's a photograph of him with camp prisoners.
Dönitz war Soldat, Speer ein Opportunist.
@takethisyousob stimmt , Die amerikanische Regierung ist dafür verantwortlich
@takethisyousob ich habe dieses video schon gesehen,und jemand spricht darüber
sie wollten nach dem krieg deutschland zerstören ,aber das haben sie nicht geschaft weil die deutschen großartige Leute sind. Lang lebe Deutschland
@takethisyousob UND...Merkel.
@@bougrineyuba3253 don't hold it against the European Americans of today. Plenty of us recognize the crimes of our government. We'll all make it right soon.
@@thomas1162 yes i know.i was talking about the us government not the americans
Speer was an opportunistic liar in my opinion, while Doenitz comes across as an honourable serviceman. He was in charge f the navy, what else is he going to do when ordered to attack? He’d have done the same Job regardless of who was in power. Under him U boats attempted to rescue survivors until the allies attacked them while they were doing so.
That's all true, but note how uncomfortable he gets once the questions about the Holocaust come up.
still the things that he did or didn’t do about the holocaust are horrible - however he said it in this video and I’ve heard it from one of my grandpa’s friends who was drawn into the marine he really didn’t judge jews and punished people who acted oddly towards people of jewish origin. Speer can burn in hell tho - tries to save himself in his older statements and push everything he did onto Hitler even tho he was one of the worst war criminals of all time
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
@@greenogre22 agreed!
That's all true. He was a damn talented architect and organiser though.
I do not like the cut that they did at 3:30. Doenitz seems to start that part by saying that detaining people is not against the laws of war, and making detained people work is also not against the laws of war, and I feel like he is building up to says, but mass execution was a war crime, but then they cut it off there and transition to someone else.
You don't really know that, he could say anything after that
@@Argi1000 And there in is the problem...
We don't know
@@warwolf715 Well assuming a precise story was told, a dealbreaker in an interview like that, why would they cut it out? It would just make an interview more interesting. I'd say it's unlikely
Doenitz was absolved of war crimes which makes sense to me.
The edits and video are biased; they want to make a point of view made... The fact that YT has not censored also tells you where the bias lies...
Speers laugh at the end is chilling , almost like he can't believe he didn't get executed for what he was involved with .
Cry more
From the way he says it in German it’s definitely not a malicious laugh
@@SupremeCKS Can confirm
He was definitely laughing at the irony of the interviewer's statement.
Deal with it
Doenitz was a naval leader, doing a job. Not a war criminal. Speer got off easy.
Navel?
Albert Speer threw his historical self, his party members and everything he believed in under the bus to clear himself.
Pretty much this, while Hess never backed down and paid for it.
thilgu ... And to throw a perhaps wholly different log or twig or some in-between combustible on the fire, what are we to make of Michael Cohen? Different time different place different almost everything. Yet historic events maybe do in reality exist in some kind of 3-D space, with certain events and actors and actions closer together, more comparable, culpable, in one space or quadrant, and others, significantly farther apart. Also with very different degrees of intensity, both in terms of quantity and quality, of infliction of harm and suffering ... as well as to whom, by whom, and for what reason. History, human action, rationalization, all present the possibility of these many different judgements or discernments. And as well, of course, by force of mind, culture, or happenstance, the appearance sometimes of hardly any judgements, discernment, or consequences at all. If this seems hard - not always easy to make distinctions - I think it is. Hard to make judgments. Hard to conduct oneself in life, in competition, and most gravely in politics and war. Yet, must we not strive to understand, to properly navigate, to engineer, to lead our lives. Must we not continue to wrestle with, to struggle, with questions of responsibility and repentance? To continue somehow to try and safeguard life and truth and at least some evolving sense of human justice and decency when we can? There is not one easy answer, but like obscenity, perhaps if we open our hearts, we may find, in the varied circumstances of our lives, and at some deep level of instruction and conscience we find ourselves immersed in, what seems right, and what wrong. What actions we humans should or should not do, or even be a party to, and why? This drama continues as we work out our own new sets of challenging issues in this rivalrous, nuclear-tipped, slow-burn climate-change threatened, current pandemic-racked world.
@@harlanglass Wow you must have a lot of time on your hands
@@sebastianelytron8450 he also says a lot without actually saying at all ..
@@dodibenabba1378 Well it's definitely not nonsense nor meaningless, but certainly not the easiest to read.
Sometimes you need a lot of words to really put forth an idea properly, or otherwise with fewer words it would be too open to interpretation. And of course, this reads like discourse, taking the reader on a journey through his thought instead of plainly stating it.
There is a wrong translation at 8:18 where Speer said "Lagebesprechung" which translates to something like "situation meeting". His words seem to be misheard as "Lager-Besprechungen" which would be translated as "camp discussions". It suggests there were discussions about camps, but he talks about something else.
Edit: Ah! I see @nPianoRun already pointed it out.
Oh fuck off.
@Olivia Dove not to talk about falsifying original tapes to put things into them that weren't there, could show some examples..
@@3goats1coat Such as?
@Olivia Dove Of course, no one ever mishears or mistranslates a member of the Master Race, except deliberately , to cover up the fact that they never committed a crime.
@@redbaron4908 you can mistranslate the word for it.
War crimes don't count when you win, said the allies.
Dean Keepers You truly believe the allies didn't commit war crimes?
Said Adolph in fact
@Dean Keepers Even if the source is sketchy i just did a quick search to prove how easy is to find allied war crimes, there are a lot more results and sources.
@Dean Keepers Your justifications and mental gymnastics are hilarious.
@Dean Keepers okay your iq is pretty low
Absolutely fascinating. I’ve come to believe I’ve seen all the good nazi interviews, like world at war etc. but I have never seen this one! Amazing!
I`m just started to watch these interviews. We never learned about this side in school. Only about the jews.
Remember, call them Good Germans, technically, there's no such thing as a Good Nazi.
@@saltycrotchwhiff3946 You never learned about the German Nazi's at school? It's not like Dønitz and Speers opinion or story is worthy to be teached at school either😂
@@mayaburak93 You should read the most recent biography on Speer. In the sixties he was allowed to re-write his nazi past and erase a lot of the dark manner in which he managed to reach the highest echolons of the nazi party....
any suggestions for good ones?
Pretty important interviews for history. Never seen such things or similar things as a german and I am pretty sure it is the same for 95% of Germans.
I named my bakery “Admiral Doughnuts “
SuperSlik50 Classic. Never would have thought of that. Beware of the PC police who will flip their lid thinking you are a crazy right wing nut.
"LuftWaffle" too is a good one
Carmel Apple Speers anyone?
"That's the fourth batch this morning sold out! Who would have thought that Gingerbread Fuhrers would be such a hit?"
Are they blitzfried
Thanks so much for sharing this! I've been to countless museums and seen hours of documentaries on TV for twenty years and yet never have I seen such long uninterrupted interviews with Speer and Dönitz.
I found it very interesting to hear Speer's reflections on how ambition in your job can make you forget the bigger picture. He seemed to genuinely want people to learn from his mistake of being too absorbed in being a good employee. This was the same points that Hanna Arendt made about Adolf Eichmann and I think it shows us some fundamental psychological traits of human nature that we don't necessarily approve of, but is just there in our genetic code. Being aware of it and fighting it whenever it comes to the surface is what we should learn from these war criminals I think.
speer had some crazy eye brows
Sharpie brows
....and with that, the mystery of Hitler's missing spare moustaches was solved
Just check out Rudolf Hess
I just noted thst to myself
. 😂
@@cremebrulee6459 lol
awesome quality! thanks for the upload!
They wanted to hand Doenitz for the unlimited submarine warfare, but the US Navy intervened to advocate a prison sentence for him because US naval officials were rather uncomfortable at the idea of executing someone for practicing unlimited submarine warfare as the US had also done against the Japanese.
That also goes to show the difference between the World Wars in terms of hypocrisy and double standards.
@@williammerkel1410 Yes.. The business at Versailles where everything was blamed on the Germans as if the French or British never fired a shell that did any damage to anything during the war. The first thing a social worker will do when there is a severe domestic problem is to try and establish the idea that fights always involve the roles of two people. The wife that is constantly beaten persists in contributing to the problem by either not shooting the jerk she married or leaving him, etc. Did the allies have the god given right to kill Germans while Germans could only commit serious war crimes? It seemed so to the Germans. It was like a couple of three year olds arguing over a toy.
Kranzbühler actually interviewed Nimitz about it for the trial. Nimitiz told it as it was. Case closed.
18:30 That smile. That damned smile.
hella creepy by just thinking what he did in his life. greetz from germany
yes, pretty disturbing.
Nazi son of a bitch...
@@mongo2022 stay mad haha
An eloquent man denouncing complicity.
Karl Doenitz, what a character!
Every time a question was being asked to him, his whole face quivered in fear.
No, he seems more confused by the suggestive questions than frightened 😅
@@williamyoung9401 Not really, he probably laughed inwards when he thought about the fact that the West would sooner or later become what we see today.
Yes a great character!!!
omg... what do you smoke?
This is utterly fascinating.
Man it felt like two philosophers are giving advice on life, crazy how time flys..
My respect for Admiral Doenitz has only gone up after watching this. He seems to be an honorable and straightforward man. The Allies may have won the Naval war, but it came at a devastating price.
Admiral Doenitz was a soldier through and through. Speer was a scumbag that conned his way out of the gallows.
Who do you think were building Donitz submarines? He knew . He should have gone to the scaffold.
I can't agree tbh. Doenitz is evading all the questions asked by the interviewer. He knew about everything and is making up excuses during the whole interview. Nothing straightforward about that in my opinion.
@@mace11880 Yes true he may have had his compulsions just like anybody else serving their country for the right or wrong reasons. The British, French, Dutch committed a lot of atrocities during their colonial rule, some even worse than what the Nazis did. Nobody seems to have a problem with that. WW2 basically gave the Allies a taste of their own medicine.
Funny people hate Doenitz but love Schindler. They did the same exact thing lol.
When Speer speaks so easily and candidly after he had served his time, it is clear that the Nuremburg trial was a relief to him, allowing him to express his true feelings. He wasn't the only person "Inside the Third Reich."
I doubt if the 20 years were any picnic. But if the alternative is being hung by the neck....
It's been said that luckily Albert Speer was spared on part that he was a good looking man. My conclusion is that he was a vary smart and well spoken man, Karl Doenitz was as well.
Even as an old man he was very good looking. He was intelligent and charming too. This is probably what saved his life.
The halo effect
Dönitz a look a like Honecker. Incredible, right?
A little bit. Yet he had way more integrity and honour than Honecker ever had.
Speer basically kept the Nazi War machine running far longer then it should have. The man is a genius
A very cunning one too. He fooled his way out of the noose, that's for sure
TRue. HE would be the CEO that any business owner wanted to have.
No, he was not a genius. HIs world view was too limited, and he had no vision. What one calls a genius is someone like Einstein, who ironically, and no doubt would have been to Hitler's displeasure, was a Jew.
@@ondinehd6889exactly
Gitta Sereny's book on Speer is the best analysis of him I have seen. She spent many weeks with him and his family while researching her book. Impossible to summarise in a few words, but basically she concluded he was in self-denial about his guilt. His is a classic case of the dangers of being flattered by someone with power, i.e. Hitler. Speer's flattered ego led him to take the path he did, and having gone down such a path, and been successful, even with the knowledge of what was happening (despite his denials) there was no turning back. In other circumstances, he would probably simply have been a moderately successful architect and family man.
She also stated that Ausc'hwitz was a terrible place but it was n o t an exterm'ination camp.
@@virginialopezmartinez1510 So she wasn't exactly a truth teller, either.
A newly discovered letter by Adolf Hitler's architect and armaments minister Albert Speer offers proof that he knew about the plans to exterminate the Jews, despite his repeated claims to the contrary.
Writing in 1971 to Hélène Jeanty, the widow of a Belgian resistance leader, Speer admitted that he had been at a conference where Heinrich Himmler, the head of the SS and Gestapo, had unveiled plans to exterminate the Jews in what is known as the Posen speech. Speer's insistence that he had left before the end of the meeting, and had therefore known nothing about the Holocaust, probably spared him from execution after the Nuremberg trials at the end of the second world war.
It helped earn him the name of "the good Nazi" and the image of a genius architect who had misguidedly slipped into Nazi circles to further his career. Instead of facing death as many top Nazis did, Speer served 20 years in prison, mainly for using slave labour.
@@virginialopezmartinez1510she was making a distiction between it and pure extermination camps like Treblinka. Auschwitz was also a labor camp.
Great clip...priceless footage of those who were there.
Only if we were able to get an interview of Rommel after the war. But that was obviously impossible.
Too bad they didn't made similar interviews with USSR officials.
there should be a geneva convention that every top-ranking general should do similar interviews after every war even if he was on the winning side.
@@st0ox of course I was sarcastic with my comment. There was no chance for that and you can make a strong case that apart from gas chambers USSR was no different than Third Reich when it comes to conquered nations (just ask Poles, Ukrainians and so on).
@@Schyderap I think there was one mayor difference though. The Germans were very organized in systematically killing people with a specific background (Not just talking about the elephant in the room here, for example also Roma or disabled persons). They also had an ideology that was wrong on so many levels, but kinda justified their mass murder.
The USSR on the other hand was much more chaotic and random in the killing. Of course they had probably the most successful intelligence organisation in the world* and were effective in killing so called enemies of they state, but they also killed so much more people purely random.
* Stalingrad and the Bomb...you cannot top that. Maybe Alan Turing can top that if he had more time in his life and another mayor war to crack another enigma like thing or build an army of androids or something.
@@Schyderap I am Pole, sorry but, comparing 30 000 executed millitary men and a couple hundred dead in 40 years of Polish communist rule to 3 million murdered thanks to the Nazi is pretty stupid and offending, this kind of symetrism doesn't make you seem smart. One side wanted 90% of Polish population death, rest as slaves, the other wanted to establish communism even if it mean killing innocents or critics of the system
@@st0ox It wasn't random, enemies of power were profiled in the perseccussions. Your opinion reminds me of this satiric video
ruclips.net/video/0wnkGUk_KHE/видео.html
Unlike the others he knew exactly how to play the game. As it turned out he was the game master. Played the Nazis’s. Played the allies. Genius!
Exactly, he played everyone. Post war selling architectural drawings with Hitler's signature to auction houses who asked no questions.
Savchenkov1 I know it sounds bad but it’s kind of shocking just how smart he was. The Americans were stunned at the level of detail he was able to recall after the war. Good or bad he had an exceptionally interesting existence.
Don't forget about the Nazis we brought over as guests to help us in our weapons and torture endeavors.
marlene g shhhhh you’re not allowed mention them
As opposed to letting the communists take them?
@@jeremyheintz1479 I'm sure they took some too.
@@marleneg7794 yes they did. It was a race to get as many as possible.
@@jeremyheintz1479 but morally speaking from objective of the allied powers, shouldn't they all be hung or in prison? So the killing of jews only matters to make a point, but behind the scenes its business as usual
I believe Dönitz and everything he says. Not every member of the regime was evil. Look at rommel for example.
I see Dönitz and Rommel as essentially honourable men.
Well inderectly they Supported nazi germany in their Action..
@@Nachbardesvertrauens yes, you are correct.
@@Nachbardesvertrauens many didnt alot did but some had other political beliefs but didnt voice them for fear of execution or imprisonment you plank
@@theexplrman2223 Mostly simple soldiers. Furthermore there lost their faith when they Realized the war cant be won anymore
"We are shaped by our thoughts; we become what we think."
Yes, or as Heinrich Heine put it: 'thoughts preceed action, as lightning precedes the thunder." Had his cautions to his fellow Germans in the 1820s been listened to, none of this would ever have happened. He was right about book-burning, and he was right about the inherent, Germanic love of militarism being tempered only by a thin veneer of christianity. He predicted a scene in Germany far worse than the mindless savagery of the French Revolution.
@@ssrmy1782 also if the allies had not been so tyrannical in their punishment of Germany after WW1 perhaps it wouldn't have happened....
"As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he."
If that's the explanation for my 20 - year sentence ...haltet euren Großvater im Herzen fest.
One of the craziest things you can ever do is to believe that "rules" will be followed during a war, especially when you're winning.
even more when you're loosing !
This is a gem. To understand history we need interviews like this of the key high ranking Nazi officials to understand their mindsets. Dönitz seems to be distancing himself from his Nazi past. I wonder why? Lol
Theres a thing called... Death
1:33 - actually that is the law of modern Germany. A soldier has the right to disobey if the order is immorral and against basics of freedom.
It is the right of any soldier in most Armies of the world. Especially the British.
It is a right, but do it and watch your career go down the toilet.
do you know a lot of German soldiers who disobeyed burning to the ground greek villages and killing even pregnant women and babies back then?
@@AbdulAllahAbuDaoud Then you are dishonorable and not a soldier.
Well you got to live to make it to Court! Who was going to make sure they were safe until then? Lol
Speer was lucky to avoid the death penalty, he was heavily involved in slave labour, and yes he did try to improve the conditions for some slaves, it was only in the name of efficiency. So many people died under slave labour, he must avoided the rope because he cooperated.
He survived cos he blamed Sauckel, who wrongly hung. Speer was pure evil, like Hitler and Himmler. Above probably all of them bar Goering, at the main Nuremburg trial he deserved hanging.
@@burnleyfan11965 how was Sauckel wrongly hanged? Are you saying the head of labour had no role in those conditions?
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
ja, das war er!
To be completely honest, I was genuinely starting to believe in the beginning that Speer, even though I already knew of his crimes, was actually an alright person. Of course I broke out of it, because I realized that's stupid, but it's honestly no wonder that that man escaped the noose he well deserved
Its because of his professionalism. Its like a carrot on a stick to make people give him a chance.
hrzl was anti semitic he HATED the joz he believed in the German race suprmacy
@@messianic_scam Good
@@rlm2933
what you mean good? do you know what that means?! Theodr Hertz the imposter is not even Joz they stole somebody land over a big fat lie these people are not joz who established Israel and ruling over palestine and jewish agency controling the world they ain't Jews
@@rlm2933
what you mean good do you know what that means these who established Israel are not even joz
He obviously liked the media attention and he was smart enough to understand the importance of the media and how he could use it for his own purpose ie to project a more positive image and distinguish himself from the other nazis in order to preserve his legacy. He worked hard to regain some respectability and he, undoubtedly, was served by his elegant, well-spoken, poised public persona.
WHAT AN ABSOLUTELY FASCINATING VIDEO 🎥🍿❣️
I've always regarded Doenitz as a military officer and of no blame.
I have read a lot about Speer and concluded that he was not an evil person but was very ambitious. Speer only thought about Speer and nothing else.
I do blame him a bit because about the time of his illness he knew full well what was happening with the Jews, I know he didn't like it, but he was given a chance to resign because of his health and he didn't take it. Because of his ambition he still wanted to stay near the top of that evil regime .I blame him for that.
I dont get those inquisitory questions about anti-semitism when half or more of the civilized world from west to east was anti-semite at that time...
It's a different world now.
@@psychotic.reaction I cry evertiem
And France was the worst of all.
@UCghn01VGa0NlxRcBiLax6lg Western democracies!!! Oh wait...
@@user-xq4st9ie7r That Number is from a Book by a female jewish Author. And it is 6 Millions, not Billions in there. Wikipedia quotes her as the Source of the 6 Millions. The Red Cross at the Time had stated something like 2 Millions which is much more believable. This is in the same Line as in the 80s it was said WW2 had cost 50 to 55 Million Lives and today they inflated the Number to 76 Million Lives. The Reason behind this is to make the Crime looking bigger than it was to make todays Crimes looking smaller.
brilliant, such a massive contrast between both gentlemen. thank you as we should never forget the people behind the history no matter the horror of it.
I must say that's the most beautifully spoken German I have ever listen to. Even with my rusty language skills it's crystal clear. If only they all sounded like that.
Almost every german sounds Like that its just Dome Dialekts that sound rough
Speer was an opportunistic chameleon, always willing to change based on the way the wind blew. That last statement with the little chuckle at the end is evil that chills to the bone.
Saying you're glad you didn't get executed is evil?
I'll admit the phrasing came off weird but wouldn't anyone be thinking that? The difference is that Speer said it. If he's an opportunist, he's not very good at it since he seems to be openly admitting it. And a 100% opportunist will never let people think they're an opportunist.
That`s only your projection. That was a kind of German humour, really.
@@saltycrotchwhiff3946 Exactly! Very much a German type of humor. ..and the editor's decision to end the video right at that moment was a technique to illicit a certain reaction from the viewer.
The admiral really had to bite his lip when asked about the concentration camps. The price of freedom I guess.
Im glad i got to see this.
Thank you anon for uploading.
Still, within few years and little effort these people dominated the world.
„little effort“
like my Dad used to say "some people get flushed down the toilet but still come back up smelling of roses"
Never forget who actually started ww2 or why they started it or what they did to Germany and the Germans during the Weimar Republic,
7/2024: Good Day From The Future. I did just subscribe.
I have seen Speer several times in videos, but never Admiral Karl Doenitz. WoW. Living History.
(a thought comes to mind; "Operation Paperclip"... ) This is excellent. Very Educational and Interesting
Thank You & Best Regards.
One day the people will know.
Speer, smirking at the end..... thinking... "how nice to know I got away with my skin still attached"
listen to what the us-prosecuter at the nuremberg-trials had to say about speer. i guess that should be considered as the truest impression: ruclips.net/video/DUOeLS2QK38/видео.html
Doenitz liked frequent communication with his U boats on patrol. Those radio coded messages cost them plenty of losses.
Damn i thought my eye brows were thickkkkk lawddd
Revealing when Speer talking during his private movies says something to the extent that all the top families hung out together in a way I would imagine the Mafia families would . Insightful !
Yes, the Nazis were basically gangsters in control of a country.
It's terribly worrying that many viewers who commented here say that they see Doenitz as a stand up honest military man, after having heard him state that he didn't know "what had gone on before" and that if he had, "he'd have said the opposite". This, after a decade of hundreds of thousands of people in Germany and in the territories occupied by the German invasions had been daily marched out of their neighborhoods and homes, and over time, placed on trains and shipped away en masse, and after his own severely antisemitic speech making. The claim "I never permitted the slightest injustice against any person of Jewish origin" as commander of the Navy is not believable nor even possible given the laws he was carrying out, (and those being broken), in acts of violence against all the peoples of Europe, and given the speeches and meetings of the leadership he attended and worked in. I see eagerness to believe the claims of Nazi true believers who rose to the highest level of power in the Nazi regime to oversee war and murder against every population the military were able to reach. This willingness to believe their claims was not acceptable only a very few short years ago. We can take this as a piece of evidence of resurgent Fascism.
I always think about 4-5 Bengalis starved to death by Churchill. Thats Bengal alone.
When i think of 6-7 Million Ukranians slaughtered and starved to death by Stalin in 1932, it gives me the shivers. Thats Ukraine alone.
Poland went full-blown Nationalistic, aggressing every bordering Nation, trying to create a pure white blonde blue eyed slawic polish race.. on neighbouring territory.
Was it a better world when half of Europe was stuck in Gulags and Communist/Bolschewik Dictatorship?
And since when is Colonialism, the most racist cancer in the world, a good thing?
Ever notice that the Germans bever fought against Africans, Asians, Arabs and Hindus?
Why did Germany only fight against the Supre,e-White-Colonial-Power and Communism?
@@germaniatv1870 the Bengal Famine wasn't intentional. It was the result of food from the region being shipped away for use by soldiers and blockades from Japan which made resupplying the region difficult. I don't know what you're yapping about with Poland "trying to create a pure white blonde blue eyed slawic polish race." Yes, Eastern Europe under the Soviet Union was awful, but saying that it's worse than what the Nazis would've done is outright moronic. Germans did fight against Africans. They colonized Tanganyika, Togo, Rwanda, Burundi, and Namibia.
"And since when is Colonialism, the most racist cancer in the world, a good thing?" That's literally what WWII was about. The Nazis in their own words said that the Volga River would be their Mississippi river, where Germans would flock towards to start farms. I sincerely hope you're just a troll, because there's no way an actual human being could possibly be this dumb.
I am thankful that those survived and were able to tell their stories, whether they are believable or not. Thats much more useful to us younger generations than any german high command staff that was executed as punishment after the war.
15:28 "Long before the Jews were murdered, it had all been expressed in my buildings". Amazing that Speer was so forthcoming. That can't have been easy to say.
That last laugh has a bit of a sinister feel
Well, unfortunately for him there is one ultimate justice that nobody escapes. Not all sins always go unpunished in this life, but they certainly don't go unpunished after this one.
@@darthroden Oh shut the fuck up, stop talking about an eventual afterlife like if know something, you ain't know shit about it, nobody ever came back from "there" to tell anything to anybody !
@@victorscaramanga7329 Ah and there is the inevitable atheist fascist response whenever someone mentioned the idea of an afterlife. Almost like clockwork. LOL!
5:40 Speer looks like Hector Salamanca
haha
I teach voice-over and narration and have always wondered how Karl Donitz's voice sounded in conversation, having never heard it. I had guessed a voice sort of high and somewhat thin, with a certain lack of tonality. I was correct. Whereas Speer was a high baritone to low alto, Donitz was a mid soprano.
The final part....
He was much more attractive, inteligent and appealing, which gave the jury the benefit of the doubt...
"Well, if that's what gave me the advantage for the 20 years prison sentence then i am happy that i made this positive impression"
What a sentence....
Journalist and fairness tip:
Let the people finish their sentence.
Nop. This isn´t kosher.
Albert Speer, der Mannheimer. Das kann man so gut hören.
Aber nicht alle Mannheimer sind so schlechte Menschen........
@@tt-rs1457 Nää, Monnemer sinn die beschde Leit.
everyone is onboard when you think your team will win.... but then run and deny all of it when they lose
That is so true. Same with the last US President.
It's what anyone with a functioning brain would do in that situation.
@@septimiusseverus343 then you are not qualified to respond
With subdued flair and energy at the right time, he took over the world with intelligence, charm... you don't want to hurt that man and he knew he came across that way
We all have our days. They seem based af but have to be careful about what they say. I wish Doenitz was my grandfather.
0:35 were the MPs holding some kind of baton ? like if anyone got out of hand would they give them couple licks with it?
More ceremonial.. but yes in principle 😂
@@3345-p9g If you call it truncheon or blackjack, you realize it didn't just have a ceremonial function. Having seen with my own eyes the American MPs at work between 1945 and 1954 (and the Italian police even after), I can assure you that it is very effective in "maintaining order".
@@sergiogregorat1830 Yes but unlikley they were glong to kick off and fight there way out of the building😂 I know they can be good enforcers Im frok Plymouth the Royal Navys reguators(police) are nicknamed crushers because of when they are required to maintain order in pubs clubs and bars that sailors swarm to and start fights...
Doenitz was an honourable man. "Like firing on lifeboats." "Exactly, that was out of the question for us."
Same goes to Rommel, when he disobeyed the commando code from Hitler. Even admired the SAS, and Commando regiments for their accomplishments.
Royal navy submariners machine gunned shipwrecked german crews on Mediterranian on two occasions, captain Miers was given a reprimand, nothing more. Still the allies had got the nerve to accuse Dönitz of their own kind of foul play.
The full coverege of these incident was written on the log book of HMS Torbay., the RN submarine. Miers should have been accused at Nuremberg.
The Architecture from Speer was such a Great ! I very like his Buildings ! ⭐⭐⭐
pervers
Sutch a sweet, angelic voice saying.... Der Kriegsmarine unter mein befehl.... 0:21... Beautiful...
Maybe the admiral didn't know what was actually happening in the camps. We interned thousands of Japanese Americans during ww2 in camps and a lot of Americans didn't or still don't know they existed.
There is a significant difference between an admiral and a common soldier. I cant prove that Dönitz knew of what was going on in the Deathcaps, but I dont believe him when he denies to know anything. A common soldier, like my great grandfather, I could believe that they didnt know what happened and they should still be damned for voting for Hitler, not standing up when they rounded up the jews, participated in looting jewish buildings and fighting in this war.
Bad as the Japanese internment camps were, I don’t think they compare to Auschwitz and other death camps.
@@CBeatty59 We will never forget what you did to our german soldiers after the war. "Your not prisoners but merley not weaponized enemies". This a fucking joke,with your hole "clean" and "liberator" bullshit piss off
And the Japanese had Unit 731. Look it up
@@noranqey Not sure if german or not, but: Junge, du solltest dich erstmal um den eigenen Dreck am Stecken kümmern bevor du irgendwem vorwirfst etwas nie vergeben zu können.
In general (also to @Claudette Branchard): It is without debate, that the US-Army commited warcrimes against german soldiers and never proseucuted the perpetrators, but the victims of those (confirmable) acts rank in the low hundreds. If you are using these cases to distract from nazi war crimes, we should really question what your motives are @noranqe
Speer was the greatest wise guy and a twister in the whole Reich. For me, he was a completely fallen man, a business man, a careerist.
This is a very interresting interview. A Trial is a Show, and Speer understood that from the very beginning, and he got 20 years. But Dönitz didnt. He got ten years. Dönizts played his cards in a lousy way.
There is one more thing and that is, if Göring not being so arrogant, mabye they wouldnt hang him.
The way I see it, the only man who played his cards well were Albert Speer.
I do beleive that Göring could have got away with 20-30 years, or mabye life, but his arrogance destroyed it for him.
This Trial is a very interresting part of history.
This is one of those videos for which I adore RUclips.
Sadly, the subtitles are very inaccurate
that lugh of Speer on the end of intreviev...prety damn cinicle dont you think??
Yes
Ol doenitz what a man,he'd make a great grampa,the stories this old warrior knows,that he keeps to himself,Europa unite!!!!!!!...,