Some people are interested in learning about the strengths and limitations of our monitoring technology. If all you want to know is that it was a glitch, why are you looking for more information?
Their 5.9 or 6.0 estimate is clearly wrong, their nearest instrument failed and many of the others “clipped”, so this geologist you all interviewed doesn’t know what he’s talking about, I don’t care how many degrees he has.
@@brandonhill2183 basic understanding of statistics. Their model predicted a 90% chance of a >3.0 magnitude earthquake happening in the next 24 hours from the time the largest earthquake occurred. This assumed the earthquake was a 6.0. There have already been nearly 30 additional 3.0s in just a couple of hours. Clearly the probability of this was closer to 100% than it was to 90%. They’ve revised their probability distribution and I expect they will upwardly revise the magnitude estimate as well once they get a seismologist in front of the data who can actually do math.
@@brandonhill2183 go look at the USGS map and tell me what you see. I see exactly one seismometer that actually worked anywhere close to the earthquake. Because of the intensity of the shaking and the fact that seismometer is analog as well as at least 40-50 years old, it “clipped” making the data meaningless. Don’t believe me? Read the disclaimer. When it comes to earthquakes in the Eastern Sierra, USGS seismology is about as real as a palm reader.
@@dobees8183 It's annoying AF! I'm no expert in geology but I'm certainly not a RUclips "researcher" espousing perceived expert knowledge where none exists.
we're on a 5-7 day earthquake watch.....IT can still potentially be a foreshock
I’m south of Lake Tahoe, the quakes and aftershocks were pretty annoying
I'm in Carson City and felt a strong shaking!
What a long explanation for "glitch" in the system.
Some people are interested in learning about the strengths and limitations of our monitoring technology.
If all you want to know is that it was a glitch, why are you looking for more information?
Felt it in Stockton
We haven’t seen real dangerous geology yet. North American Plate pushing back.
Their 5.9 or 6.0 estimate is clearly wrong, their nearest instrument failed and many of the others “clipped”, so this geologist you all interviewed doesn’t know what he’s talking about, I don’t care how many degrees he has.
So, what makes you an expert
@@brandonhill2183 basic understanding of statistics. Their model predicted a 90% chance of a >3.0 magnitude earthquake happening in the next 24 hours from the time the largest earthquake occurred. This assumed the earthquake was a 6.0. There have already been nearly 30 additional 3.0s in just a couple of hours. Clearly the probability of this was closer to 100% than it was to 90%. They’ve revised their probability distribution and I expect they will upwardly revise the magnitude estimate as well once they get a seismologist in front of the data who can actually do math.
@@chrisw.3077 yeah, because the premier seismology lab in the country doesn't have anyone competent working for them. So, what makes you the expert
@@brandonhill2183 go look at the USGS map and tell me what you see. I see exactly one seismometer that actually worked anywhere close to the earthquake. Because of the intensity of the shaking and the fact that seismometer is analog as well as at least 40-50 years old, it “clipped” making the data meaningless. Don’t believe me? Read the disclaimer. When it comes to earthquakes in the Eastern Sierra, USGS seismology is about as real as a palm reader.
@@brandonhill2183 USGS complete BS! Go to Ron at emergency management associate.
WHY DONT YOU PUT A DATE ON YOUR VIDEO ?
So it was a sympathy quake reading, essentially.
Want information on an earthquake, and all the comments are either bible verses or journalistic criticisms. lol
All these RUclips University expert graduates and wacky Christians with their never ending end of the world predictions are so annoying!
That part!
@@dobees8183 It's annoying AF! I'm no expert in geology but I'm certainly not a RUclips "researcher" espousing perceived expert knowledge where none exists.
Next watch for Bishop, California
Still no quake here in Bishop! 😂
BS!
Yeah, just like global warming. Programing