Avocet AV24 Airplane Can Be Built in 2 Weeks

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • Have any questions about the aircraft or interested in buying one? Contact myplane@mojogrip.net
    There’s a new 2-seater experimental aircraft design being built. It’s called the Avocet AV24 and I just found out about it.
    The Avocet AV24 is the newest experimental airplane to soon hit the GA market. I got a chance to speak with the aircraft Designers Steve Situm and Ian Burnham. Both Gentlemen have over 4 decades in aircraft design and kit builds combined.They are claiming to have designed an aircraft that’s harder to stall and much easier to build; build to taxi within a month.
    Here are the expected performance stats for the AV24
    Engine: Lycoming IO 360
    Speed: 230 - 250 mph
    Capacity: 2 people
    Useful load: 730 lbs
    Baggage Capacity: 100 lbs
    KIT Price: $68,000 (Includes 1 week build assist)
    Become A Commercial Pilot In 9 Months www.slingpilot...
    Use the referral code: "MOJOGRIP" to get $1000 OFF
    Manage your aircraft with coflyt.com
    Use the referral code: "MOJOGRIP" to get 90 days free.
    Music:
    bensound.com
    hooksounds.com
    youtube.com

Комментарии • 148

  • @flycow69
    @flycow69 4 года назад +5

    I actually spoke to Steve yesterday for over 40 minutes what a smart man with great personality and down to heart management process. Thanks Steve to being generous with your valuable time. I am hoping to be one of your first aircraft builder and flyer. Talk to you soon and hopefully I will see you at the factory/workshop soon.

  • @GeneralSirDouglasMcA
    @GeneralSirDouglasMcA 3 года назад +4

    I like that it’s fixed-gear. Maintenance and insurance will be substantially lower than if it were RG.

  • @StudioRV8
    @StudioRV8 4 года назад +15

    Seems like a pipe dream now, but because of dreamers we have some really good kits. My hats off to them and I wish them the best. Drive on!

  • @foesfly3047
    @foesfly3047 4 года назад +7

    This is an awesome video format! Nothing but the facts as presented by the people directly involved. Thank you MojoGrip!

  • @doranjaffas9645
    @doranjaffas9645 4 года назад +10

    You did really good on this one. Of all the composite birds out there this one really has my interest. Probably still out of my budget but much more realistic for the masses.
    You had me at 0-360😊
    Doran Jaffas
    N625MS
    Wittman Tailwind W8

  • @DarkAeroInc
    @DarkAeroInc 4 года назад +6

    Nice video Mike! Glad to see new experimental aircraft coming to the market!!!

  • @brent1041
    @brent1041 4 года назад +48

    Looks cool hopefully they sell a bunch of planes so I can buy a used one someday. Haha

  • @garrygballard8914
    @garrygballard8914 4 года назад +12

    Sounds like an excellent program.

  • @h20bearboy65
    @h20bearboy65 4 года назад +20

    If this were true, and available, I would be there tommorrow with my 70K in hand. unfortunately I suspect it's 5 years to market, and the price will have doubled!

    • @waltermajor779
      @waltermajor779 3 года назад

      i realize it's kinda off topic but do anyone know a good place to watch newly released series online?

    • @thisismagacountry1318
      @thisismagacountry1318 2 года назад

      @@waltermajor779 No

  • @pano-rific8838
    @pano-rific8838 4 года назад +5

    Nice looking airplane Mike. I'll have to look in to these guy. 2 weeks to taxi is my idea of a build plan. I'll have to look these guys up. Hope your Sling project is going well. Bet your not getting much sleep with all the excitement to get it finished. I wish you my best. ~ your neighbor

  • @Crispy_Mofo_
    @Crispy_Mofo_ 4 года назад +10

    I will have to keep my on that one.

  • @flaviomarcio8789
    @flaviomarcio8789 3 года назад +2

    Wow !!!.........Very beautiful airplane !!!!!

  • @DeRose05
    @DeRose05 4 года назад +2

    I hope you follow up with these guys when they get a bit further down the road. Interesting ideas here.

  • @waytooslow
    @waytooslow 4 года назад +6

    Nice looking plane

  • @johnbybee5276
    @johnbybee5276 2 года назад

    Hey Mike it was great getting to meet you at Osh! Great context great videos keep it up man!

  • @hermandierks6702
    @hermandierks6702 4 года назад +8

    All vaporware at this point (nothing built or flown) . Reduced parts count? Every designer has tried for that forever. Their website shows no stringers in fuselage. Bad idea. See giles G202 that had tail ripped off doing acro. This may not be aerobatic but at these speeds it can get same issues with any loss of control etc Lets follow and see how it does once flying and a few hundred built and flying. Good choice in the engine

  • @zutrue
    @zutrue 4 года назад +4

    I'm a fan of your content, but as a filmmaker I have got to tell you something: GET A WINDSCREEN FOR YOUR MICs!!!

  • @patricj951
    @patricj951 4 года назад +3

    Beautiful little airplane!

  • @costisrouchotas
    @costisrouchotas 4 года назад +6

    Too good to be true!

  • @sandman1347
    @sandman1347 4 года назад +8

    Very cool. These guys are speaking my language. A quick build and a reasonable price!

  • @Progneto
    @Progneto 4 года назад +5

    I think you guys will do well!

  • @robertphillips3078
    @robertphillips3078 2 года назад

    Very sound business plan with a built in commonsense approach. Xcellent Guys.

  • @rickh4310
    @rickh4310 4 года назад +4

    Looks pretty cool. Take my money if it comes to fruition!

  • @Michael-4
    @Michael-4 Год назад

    These guys seem really genuine.

  • @wasatchm
    @wasatchm 4 года назад +1

    this plane reminds me of the team tango. that company prides itself on true QUICK build kits.

    • @GeneralSirDouglasMcA
      @GeneralSirDouglasMcA Год назад

      Yes, the Revolution RAI Tango 2. I don’t know why it isn’t more popular than what it is. I saw them at EAA last year & this year.

  • @thomasaltruda
    @thomasaltruda 4 года назад +1

    Looks promising.. what type of construction? I would love to see RV style flush solid rivets (426ad), not blind pull rivets, and a tailwheel option. With an advertised VNE of 250 knots, this could be a RV-7 killer! But needs a tailwheel option...

  • @jamesworld3734
    @jamesworld3734 4 года назад +5

    Wow, nice looking airplane. Can you put an Aeromomentum engine in it, if you can I want one!

    • @avocetaircraft4416
      @avocetaircraft4416 4 года назад +1

      Hi James,
      Based on the CAD model, the Aeromomentum low-profile engines will fit within our cowling for the IO-360. After completing the first article, we will flight test multiple engines and publish the data so everyone will be able to see what the performance differences are.
      Thank you for your interest in Avocet.
      Steve

  • @atihery
    @atihery 4 года назад +3

    I would like to buy one of these aircrafts!

  • @stevegodwin6416
    @stevegodwin6416 2 года назад +1

    Posted two and a half years ago, but there doesn't appear to be any other news about this airplane since then. It's very interesting, but that's true of a lot of designs that never materialize. Too bad.

    • @2Phast4Rocket
      @2Phast4Rocket 2 года назад

      It is another experimental vapor ware. This video was in 2019 and the covid was in 2020 kept the business closed. But you think they have a prototype airplane instead of the CAD drawing. The performance number looks like the RV7 with higher aspect ratio wings. Glasair and Lancair both had similar programs but the composite kit construction is inherently labor intensive. Both are no longer in business because they priced themselves out of the experimental business. So the aluminum Vans RV7 is in the performance sweet spot and no other kit company has yet to create a plane that can match the "value" of the RV7 class of airplane.

  • @linebacker79
    @linebacker79 2 года назад

    Love the color scheme, Ian.

  • @jonmontelongo4304
    @jonmontelongo4304 4 года назад +4

    Hey Mojo
    Any more literature for the av24 online that we can see? Or a pdf?

    • @retiree1033
      @retiree1033 4 года назад +3

      The guy at the end of the video gave you a website to go to.

  • @Hickeroar
    @Hickeroar 4 года назад +12

    Love the look of this, and at less than 70k, it's a real contender.

    • @neomatrix3612
      @neomatrix3612 4 года назад +6

      Excluding the engine..

    • @TodayIFoundOut
      @TodayIFoundOut 4 года назад +4

      @@neomatrix3612 Even still not bad. And put something like one of Aeromomentum's in it and it would still be under $100K.

    • @neomatrix3612
      @neomatrix3612 4 года назад +1

      @@TodayIFoundOut Oh ye, I agree, lovely little plane. Just the engine is a very big cost to consider. It's actually really cool that they put a Lycoming on and not a Rotax. I would love one of these planes. Saying that though, we never even saw a pic of a real one so does it even exist? :)

  • @alexandrenazario7857
    @alexandrenazario7857 4 года назад +3

    Nice Mike.....

  • @MegaBob222222
    @MegaBob222222 2 года назад

    I would like to see some thought given to electric motor with generator to power the motor instead of battery. Please do the calc and you will see this is a WIN WIN.

  • @philipritson8821
    @philipritson8821 6 месяцев назад

    What are the chances of a taildragger version?

  • @blaster-zy7xx
    @blaster-zy7xx 4 года назад +4

    There have been a hundred guys that get to this stage. The real hard part is making it reality.

  • @williamprice2677
    @williamprice2677 4 года назад +4

    Great looking plane! Two seats too. Waiting for more info...

  • @romanhmelevsky900
    @romanhmelevsky900 4 года назад +1

    Looks similar to Van's RV-14, about 200 lbs (so, a bit) lighter than RV-14, with the same engine. BUT RV-14 available just now and many of it already built with great and helpful community around. Where is the point?

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 месяца назад

      The RV-14 flies behind an (I)O-390 ordinarily.
      This strikes me as a cross between a souped up RV-9A and a RV-7A.

  • @JoeCnNd
    @JoeCnNd Год назад

    Looks like a sport pilot could fly it now.

  • @paulbrunner1818
    @paulbrunner1818 4 года назад +3

    Good find! Best part, is that they are in Petaluma, California. Plan on meeting these guys this week 👍

  • @genedifiore7193
    @genedifiore7193 3 года назад

    Hi Mike, do you know if this project is dead? No info on their website. Thanks.

  • @Iseejas
    @Iseejas 4 года назад +2

    I'm thinking this plane will have a range of a thousand miles.

  • @wileecohagen
    @wileecohagen 4 года назад +1

    It also has to be cost effective. Most people simply can’t afford the high cost of an aircraft. Kit cars are no more complicated and they are still expensive. Avionics and powerplants are always going to be pricey, but if the airframe made up for that it would revolutionize the sport pilot world! Suddenly, people on tight budgets could realize their dreams. And if the basic aircraft was affordable it could be made so that it’s upgradable and the pilot could grow with experience and his aircraft could grow with him. If the instrument panel was modular in design a builder could set things up with basic instruments, then change out a panel down the road for a partial glass cockpit, then to a full glass cockpit and so on. If the radio panel was modular they could swap that panel to allow for better radios, then sell his original pane for a beginning pilot. The same thing for the instrument panels on either side of the cockpit. The more modular the design, the more improvements can be made and the builder can pick and choose the upgrades they want or don’t want.

  • @eaboatnuts76
    @eaboatnuts76 3 года назад

    What's the sale price for complete kit?

  • @StudioRV8
    @StudioRV8 4 года назад +2

    Oh yeah, make it in a tail wheel!

    • @avocetaircraft4416
      @avocetaircraft4416 4 года назад +4

      The AV24 will also be available in a tail dragger version 😊

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@avocetaircraft4416Great

  • @amanzain5516
    @amanzain5516 2 года назад

    Indonesia also can doing project plane

  • @issyvarsano5622
    @issyvarsano5622 4 года назад +1

    call us when you start production , delivery and first upgrade. MaDe in UsA , for planes... is not so secure for some time...Dream shit , max shit...

  • @viacheslavorlov6247
    @viacheslavorlov6247 3 года назад

    Just one question, how much?

  • @dangreving1094
    @dangreving1094 4 года назад +4

    Ok wow the price was lower than i thought.

    • @justingregoris3164
      @justingregoris3164 4 года назад

      how much is this aircraft in american or canadian currency? where do i buy it? i am from ontario canada...?

  • @MultiGrumman
    @MultiGrumman 4 года назад +3

    Новоиспечённый, с пылу с жару!

  • @neverclevernorwitty7821
    @neverclevernorwitty7821 2 года назад

    Nice, I hope this is successful.

  • @wannewan4318
    @wannewan4318 4 года назад +4

    Nice plane

  • @ricknelson3607
    @ricknelson3607 4 года назад

    Is this price without engine?

  • @flexairz
    @flexairz 4 года назад +2

    Here's the URL to the website: avocetaircraft.com/

  • @DanFrederiksen
    @DanFrederiksen 4 года назад

    Isn't a lycoming IO360 a 60k$ engine? for 200 horses.

  • @psychiatry-is-eugenics
    @psychiatry-is-eugenics 4 года назад +1

    Flying is safer than driving

  • @zsoltpapp3363
    @zsoltpapp3363 4 года назад

    70k is only for the airframe, or engine and avionics are included?

    • @avocetaircraft4416
      @avocetaircraft4416 4 года назад +2

      The only set price at this time is for the airframe kit under the launch program: avocetaircraft.com/launch-program/

  • @ejright2921
    @ejright2921 4 года назад

    Will this plane have an optional brs parachute system?

  • @MrWATCHthisWAY
    @MrWATCHthisWAY 4 года назад +2

    Your not changing your mind are you Mojo?? The aircraft looks amazing but the didn’t speak about performance and range.. I still like the Rotax low cost fuel burn. I think you made the right choice!!

    • @mojogrip
      @mojogrip  4 года назад

      Oh no. I'm sticking with the Sling TSi.

    • @MrWATCHthisWAY
      @MrWATCHthisWAY 4 года назад

      Excellent choice!! Bravo! Love it!! That’s why we follow you!

  • @MrZrryan2
    @MrZrryan2 4 года назад +5

    every new "designer" ever ---> we gonna build it super fast, super cheap, stronger, lighter, blah blah blah... then, it never happens. Mostly because those "designers" are quacks. The odd one with real Aeronautical Engineering education never venture to make such stupid promises in the first place (because they know better).

    • @berniemccann8935
      @berniemccann8935 4 года назад +3

      Are you aware that these guys are aeronautical engineers ... or are you just spouting ?

    • @MrZrryan2
      @MrZrryan2 4 года назад

      @@berniemccann8935 You think they are? I doubt it... or they would have mentioned their experience in this field. Since there was no mention of other successful projects that they were part of, it is safe to assume they are either highly unqualified, or, they have very little experience.

    • @randallsemrau7845
      @randallsemrau7845 4 года назад +3

      @@MrZrryan2 Don't be so lazy. avocetaircraft.com/about/

    • @coffeeshangarworkshop8051
      @coffeeshangarworkshop8051 4 года назад

      Situm's "Aeronatical" background is in radio control sailplanes and composite molding tech.. He has as much an aeronautical designer / engineer background as the German dude in the movie Flight of the Phoenix.

    • @MrZrryan2
      @MrZrryan2 4 года назад +1

      Fortunately, they have a couple of really experienced P.Eng's on retainer... there is a dude from Lancer (not Nubauer, the other guy), and someone else... so, MAYBE this will become a reality. Which is good, because the main designer (CEO) is primarily a project engineer that works on fine-tuning the characteristics of existing aircraft.

  • @sleeplezznightz
    @sleeplezznightz 4 года назад +1

    How do you even find this stuff?

    • @mojogrip
      @mojogrip  4 года назад +1

      Lol they find me 😄

    • @Iseejas
      @Iseejas 4 года назад

      @@mojogrip Do they pay you to post content? I would consider charging or atleast setting up a commission based affiliate link. You've prolly sold or influenced in millions of dollars of plane sales, only fair you get a small slice.

    • @berniemccann8935
      @berniemccann8935 4 года назад

      @@mojogrip -- Before charging for the Website, could you do something with the page tabs.

  • @justingregoris3164
    @justingregoris3164 4 года назад

    i am from ontario canada. can i fly this with an advanced ultra light pilot license? where do i buy this fully built airplane or airplane kit from?

    • @avocetaircraft4416
      @avocetaircraft4416 4 года назад +3

      In Canada, at the time of this reply, advanced ultra-light aircraft
      have a maximum take-off weight of 1232 lbs. The AV24 isn't designed for this category. Regarding the second question, the AV24 is currently sold only as a kit. The purchaser of the kit completes at least 51% of the building under the FAA "Major Portion Rule," which is usually referred to as the "51% rule."

    • @Austinmediainc
      @Austinmediainc 2 года назад

      @@avocetaircraft4416 hurry up and start selling it already!!! Lol Some of us are looking for something other than Vans with the same as or better performance!

  • @JLFerguson
    @JLFerguson 4 года назад

    No updates???

  • @joem5110
    @joem5110 4 года назад +1

    $68K? That's why I'm bulding a Sonerai II LTS. About $17K

    • @christianjforbes
      @christianjforbes 4 года назад +2

      VW powered and super simple vfr instruments. Having been a part in 2 Sonerai 2L ... it can totally be done at that price.
      I don’t know what Agent J is basing his comments on...maybe he’s thinking of a glass panel or certified engine costs. Now, if you pay someone to finish weld the fuselage and do the covering, that’ll add of course. Do it all yourself, yup can be done.

    • @christianjforbes
      @christianjforbes 4 года назад +1

      @Agent J have you ever built an experimental? Not an ultralight, but a proper FAA certified experimental.
      No more dangerous than a Cub.
      Sonerai actually has its own race class at Reno

    • @christianjforbes
      @christianjforbes 4 года назад +2

      @Agent J define safe? This Multi CFII is curious
      I'll trust a welded 4130 fuselage over just about any spam can. But I like those too. I just wouldn't pull any G in them.

    • @christianjforbes
      @christianjforbes 4 года назад +1

      @Agent J I don't think you really understand experimental aircraft at all.
      Performance, speed, utility, efficiency are nearly always greater in experimental.

  • @screaminlordbyron7767
    @screaminlordbyron7767 4 года назад

    70 grand and you still have to build it. With transport cost from the facility. This is more like a 100k plane. Still ok value if you don't count your own labor cost.

  • @homertalk
    @homertalk 4 года назад +2

    They need to make financing a plane more like financing a car.

    • @1compaqedr8
      @1compaqedr8 4 года назад

      I’m new to aviation. What different about financing a plane? I know insurance is a major factor.

    • @homertalk
      @homertalk 4 года назад

      @@1compaqedr8 They will not use the plane as an asset to secure the loan.

    • @1compaqedr8
      @1compaqedr8 4 года назад

      homertalk yikes so you need something else of equal value as collateral like a home? Planes can be hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    • @homertalk
      @homertalk 4 года назад

      @@1compaqedr8 Yes, usually, plus they won't deal with loans under 50k

    • @paulseale8409
      @paulseale8409 4 года назад

      I agree. Aviation should be more available.

  • @gabrielgallardo505
    @gabrielgallardo505 4 года назад +1

    Looks like an RV

  • @sloth6765
    @sloth6765 4 года назад +1

    IO-360, so 6-9 GPH = $40-50 to operate?

  • @rohancaulvin
    @rohancaulvin 4 года назад

    How to design n aircraft? I believe you won't respond but still giving a shot.

  • @Iseejas
    @Iseejas 4 года назад +1

    How legit is this company? Not much content on them.

    • @Iseejas
      @Iseejas 4 года назад

      @Agent J are you saying insurance companies are currently working with them?

    • @Iseejas
      @Iseejas 4 года назад

      @Agent J more so interested in the early bird discount and concerned about the initial 19k advance payment

  • @johnelliott4521
    @johnelliott4521 4 года назад

    Need true 4 seat 160 knot plane with 900 mile range.

  • @gersonpriante4031
    @gersonpriante4031 4 года назад

    Onde e Fabricado ?. Valor....

  • @emmanuelmercado4018
    @emmanuelmercado4018 4 года назад

    what is float? (ca. 01:47)

    • @avocetaircraft4416
      @avocetaircraft4416 4 года назад +4

      Float describes a landing where the aircraft flies near the surface for a long time before touching down. Several articles and videos covering the subject can be found by searching "wing ground effect boldmethod." The video entitled "Ground Effect: Boldmethod Live" does an excellent job of covering the subject.

    • @swiftadventurer
      @swiftadventurer 4 года назад +3

      Emmanuel Benjamin Mercado Rodriguez ...in landing phase the aircraft is flared just above the runway and enters ground effect; it floats along using up too much runway without touching down.

  • @bosatsu76
    @bosatsu76 4 года назад

    Max speed (cruise?)at 230... Economy at "???' Fuel burn for both please...

  • @mrscreamer379
    @mrscreamer379 4 года назад +1

    Why would you design a new aircraft with such an old and frankly obsolete engine? No one wants high fuel bills. No one wants to be using lead filled avgas. Surely you either go with a turbo diesel option like Diamond do, or you go petrol like Rotax. If I want a loud fuel drinking beast for under $70,000 I could instead pick up a yak-52 and get the full aerobatic experience with it. I just don't see what the USP of this aircraft is. A done to death planform with an archaic powerplant. ???
    If I'm going to build a kit aircraft, its because I can't get anything like it. I don't care that it might take me 2000 hours to build a long ez 61 ... the ramp appeal, uniqueness, its a special aircraft. This is so ordinary they should have offered a beige option.
    Finally, at 2 weeks build all you are doing is shoving the 51% liability on me. If you weren't scared of being sued, you'd just sell me the completed aircraft for the same money. No one who wants the pride of building their own aircraft thinks about a 2 week project.

  • @sarah-nm6dt
    @sarah-nm6dt 4 года назад +3

    Honda v6 turbo and you got a deal!

    • @rosebarnes9625
      @rosebarnes9625 4 года назад +1

      Who is it? Viking? Out of FL sells Honda turbo 4s out of Civics... should be awesome other than the Honda 4 is tall & narrow vs the Lycoming flat 4 is low and wide...

  • @stevebroomfield4000
    @stevebroomfield4000 4 года назад +1

    Is it just me? I didn’t get if this is an LSA.

    • @rjbishop12
      @rjbishop12 4 года назад +5

      Clearly not- Lycoming IO-360, 1825 lb Gross, 230mph.

    • @scottstolnitz8918
      @scottstolnitz8918 4 года назад +3

      Technically, it's an E-AB. Allows for constant speed prop, more HP and IFR capability if you want. As well, it's beefier. Manufacture says most of the plane is carbon fiber and the wings are fiberglass (want a little flex). It has no rivets and is rated to take 9G's!

    • @rosebarnes9625
      @rosebarnes9625 4 года назад +1

      @@scottstolnitz8918 i saw +6 and -3Gs...

    • @scottstolnitz8918
      @scottstolnitz8918 4 года назад

      @@rosebarnes9625 Spoke with the designer yesterday. That's what he "said"....

    • @rosebarnes9625
      @rosebarnes9625 4 года назад +1

      @@scottstolnitz8918 I don't know what would be more trustworthy, what the designer said or what they put on their website, maybe the changed the design and have not updated the website yet, but I got the +6/-3 from avocetaircraft.com/
      I'm excited to get some real numbers of cruise speed and fuel burn at cruise!!

  • @DavidGilesColorado
    @DavidGilesColorado 4 года назад

    why are you building a plane that takes thousands of hours?

    • @mojogrip
      @mojogrip  4 года назад

      That is the million dollar question 😄

    • @DavidGilesColorado
      @DavidGilesColorado 4 года назад

      @@mojogrip HAHAHAHAH it is an awesome quest Mr Mojo you clearly have it going. I would want to build my own aircraft to make sure it is built right. I am now actually in the thinking stage because of your boldness. My wife does not like you :-)

    • @DavidGilesColorado
      @DavidGilesColorado 4 года назад

      @@mojogrip yu have inspired me to do the same. You ROCK!

  • @MarkSDCA
    @MarkSDCA 4 года назад

    $68k.... hope that includes everything, engine and avionics, FWF too.

    • @avocetaircraft4416
      @avocetaircraft4416 4 года назад +2

      The only set price at this time is for the airframe kit under the launch program; avocetaircraft.com/launch-program/

    • @Austinmediainc
      @Austinmediainc 2 года назад

      Hahahah you can't buy a Ford F150 for 68k but you expect a friggin state of the art airplane? PS an engine is almost 60k so good luck with you search!

  • @jpfloors1
    @jpfloors1 4 года назад +2

    Yawn...All I see are a bunch of renderings. Where’s the plane? And how about moving away from the Lycosaurus.

  • @Dionm01
    @Dionm01 4 года назад +1

    Aircraft looks nice, did a quick search to see if there is any vid's on it. Found nothing meaning full. Is there any flying ? . If there going to market this aircraft, need some completed and flying. Maybe its just too new I guess. Still Mike enjoy your videos, and Cheers to you sir. Dion Markgraf RUclips: Dionm01

  • @lisafike8904
    @lisafike8904 3 года назад

    Looks Cool, Looks Great, But this is a joke video.

  • @philipritson8821
    @philipritson8821 4 месяца назад

    Wrong aircraft at this time.
    Design an aircraft around a Rotax 915/916iS with the Titan IO-340 as an option.
    Make a taildragger version available.
    2 seats side-by-side.
    80-100 pounds of baggage.
    Max gross weight 1700-1800 pounds.
    Ensure it's MOSAIC compliant.
    You've got a winner.
    The only kit manufacturer with an aircraft like that available is Rans with the S-21.
    It's selling like hot cakes.

  • @AndysRV
    @AndysRV 4 года назад +6

    Blah blah show us the plane lol

  • @tropicthndr
    @tropicthndr 4 года назад +2

    Another one you can’t put any fold up bikes in, why do all these two seat planes have useless cargo space.

    • @berniemccann8935
      @berniemccann8935 4 года назад

      I guess that after their stated extensive research within the industry, it became obvious that few people with 2-seater sport planes, needed to carry bicycles.

    • @avocetaircraft4416
      @avocetaircraft4416 4 года назад +4

      Give us a call about the make, model, and frame size of the folding bike(s) you would like to transport. (707) 230-6647

    • @Austinmediainc
      @Austinmediainc 2 года назад

      Personally I buu an airplane for how it flies, not so I can complain about biking. .you wanna bike, store it in your garage and go biking.

  • @duelcard1391
    @duelcard1391 4 года назад

    First