How can you do a list like this and not include Opabinia regalis? The thing had 5 eyes, a backwards facing mouth, a trunk with a "mouth" on the end of it to grab stuff, and was so bizarre that scientists laughed and thought it was a joke when it was first presented in a meeting.
@@williek08472 Hehe, at least for those two we, more or less, know what they are and where they fit into the animal kingdom. But what about Tullimonstrum? Even to this day, paleontologists don't agree on what it is and the speculations range from weird0 cephalopod with just one tentacle and the mouth placed at the end of it (WTF???), to really strange basal chordate (so something like a hagfish or lamprey, but very, very different, because its mouth is at the end of a trunk-like apendage and also has a sort of pincer-claw acting as a jaw, instead of no jaw at all, it has eyes on stocks and doesn't have the typical worm-shaped body plan that these creatures have) or even actual vertebrate (jawed fish)...somehow.
At least Opabinia doesn't actually have the mouth at the end of the trunk-like apendage, which is not something that can be said about Tullimonstrum, which evolved the same kind of structure, but in its case, the pincer-like grappling claw seems to actually have acted like a jaw and the trunk contained its esophagus... Oh, yeah, and its eyes were placed at the ends of of pretty long stocks facing to the sides... P.S. Forgot to mention: it lived in the Carboniferous, not the Cambrian, and, also unlike Opabinia (which was established to be some kind of stem-arthoropod, at least) it has not, to this day, been definitively placed anywhere in the animal kingdom, because paleontologists don't seem to have the slightest clue on what the eff it was and only have speculations (cause its features are not compatible to any phylum of animal we know of).
Videogame makers should take more advantage of real life fauna and flora, present and past. There is no need to struggle to come up with fantastic designs when nature already did it!
Honestly when I saw that model of anomalacaris, I immediately thought of the Pokemon Anorith, but you are right it looks like something you can easily make in Spore.
TheFilthyCasual Actually, come to think of it, some of these show up in Ark: Survival Evolved. Not all of them, but I believe Quetzacoatlus, Glyptodon, and Megatherium are all present and, I think, tamable. It's been awhile since I played mind, so I could be mis-remembering things a bit.
Don't be silly, you'd be completely comfortable about it because it would be the norm, but you'd probably fear it just as you would any other large carnivorous animal or insect. Now, if it just "appeared" today, then yes people would be terrified.
Its cool how through billions of years of evolution, and even though the giants of the world are all thought to have lived long ago, the largest animal ever still lives on earth today.
About #10: The most exciting discovery about anomalocariids in recent times is the discovery of a fossil from a German lagerstatte (a place with lots of really good fossils) that shows an Anomalocariid...in Devonian rock. So they lived for a hundred million years after we thought they went extinct.
BabaKoto brings back a memory of a very inaccurate reconstruction of a brachiosaurus where it was feathered and has a toucan beak lol it was so inaccurate and hilarious
you guys didn't even mention that anomalocaris had a mouth they think opened and closed like a camera shutter...when the whole larger than microscopic life thing was new anything went I guess
I would have liked to see more different pictures of each creature!!! I want to get a good look at the different features being described, and I found myself having to Google search a good number of these babies!!! with that said I LOVED this video, and I appreciate everything that ya'll do!
In the future could you show the pictures of the critters a bit longer? You show it so fast and lose it and just talk about it, when you could leave it up as you describe and explain it so the image sticks a bit better. I kept having to pause and go back and even google extra images to get a good idea of what they really looked like. Either way, good video as always. I love SciShow.
According to current knowledge, they are. But there aren't many people redrawing every extinct animal as our understanding changes. Not to mention quality of such pictures - I am not surprised they used nice looking vs "still-not-outdated" sketch. It's popular science thing, like thinking our genom changes only by mutations.
Okay, first of all, they're shrinkwrapped. That basically means that the artist decided to give no discretion to what the soft tissues might have looked like. In a real animal, the skeleton is not as pronounced and obvious. This is especially obvious in the Quetzalcoatlus pictures, and to a lesser extent in the Therizinosaurus picture. Also, we can tell from phylogenetic bracketing that it would have had pycnofibres (or feathers, depending on where you put the origin of feathers) which would have looked like a protofuzz. Here is a picture of what they would actually look like (this is coming from not only a skilled artist, but also a palaeontologist): 4.bp.blogspot.com/-OHUhOSWhvIE/Vzdmod7tj2I/AAAAAAAACIQ/V1us1HAbBwkOzle-yon82hgqdYx3DXnmwCK4B/s1600/Quetz%2Bsp.%2BWitton%2B2016%2Blow%2Bres.jpg The Therizinosaurus has less problems. First, the smallest problem is the feathering. It looks like it just had feathers pasted onto the featherless body, which makes no sense. You could make the argument that it would overheat the creature, but its feathers would be advanced enough in order to bypass that problem. The biggest problem are the arms. First of all, the arms are clearly not bulky enough to hold up those claws. Second of all, the hands shouldn't look like that. We can now tell that the muscles in the arms would make it impossible to hold their hands like that. They would keep their hands perpetually in a way that would make them look like they were clapping. Finally, the wings need to be bigger and extend to the second finger. Here's a good picture of a Therizinosaurus ( The theropod in the picture isn't accurate, but the Therizinosaurus is): pre13.deviantart.net/5527/th/pre/f/2012/258/5/d/canada_therizinosaurus_by_stygimolochspinifer-d5eswfo.png While we're here, I guess I'll critique all of the animals in this video. The first picture of Stegosaurus is good. The Dimetrodon could use some updating. The top of the spines would probably be exposed, leading to a half-sail look. The stance is kind of outdated. They would have probably walked more like this:img14.deviantart.net/c40a/i/2015/178/5/5/the_walking_dimetrodon_season_1_to_3_by_traheripteryx-d8yzkma.png Also, more mammalian features are certainly possible. Here's a good (but speculative) picture of a Dimetrodon: orig07.deviantart.net/ba0d/f/2015/205/c/5/dimetrodon_giganhomogenes_by_traheripteryx-d92mixx.png Also, this picture is a little outdated, because now we know that the half-sail look was more like a 75%sail look. The exposed vertebrae would be very small. The Microraptor looks very good. The second picture is bad. First of all, it has way too little feathering. Second of all, the color is wrong. In very well-preserved fossils, we can see melanosomes which tell us the color of the animal. This is very, very rare. Though, we found it for Microraptor, which tells us that it had black, crow-like feathers, and it had an iridescence, similar to modern crows. Also, the picture looks way more like a "lizard with bird wings" than "weird, four winged crow". Here's a better picture: emilywilloughby.com/gallery-data/images/full/microraptor-takeoff.jpg I don't know a lot about Glyptodons, and there weren't any pictures shown, anyway. The Macrauchenia looks good. Platybelodon looks good. No pictures were shown of Megatherium. I actually really like the Anomalocaris picture. Considering that little else had eyes at the time, it would make sense for them to have bright colors since camouflage wouldn't be a problem. All of the info is good. Though, I'm a bit dissapointed that Deinocheirus (img08.deviantart.net/71c9/i/2014/320/0/4/don_t_mess_with_deinocheirus_by_durbed-d84x94w.jpg) and Yi Qi (upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Yi_qi_restoration.jpg) weren't mentioned! Also, there is a lot of good art of accurate dinosaurs. You just need to know where to find them. John Conway, Emily Willoughby, C.M. Koseman, R.J. Palmer, Mark Witton, and more are all good artists who make accurate dinosaurs. P.S. Phylogenetic bracketing is basically taking what you know about a certain animal and applying it to other ones which are closely related. This won't always be right (in the case of Spinosaurus), but it can certainly help us figure out what prehistoric animals look like. Most animals have very fragmentary fossils and not a lot of fossils, so the only way to create what they looked like is to look at other animals. For example, we only know Dakotaraptor from one fossil found very recently, which doesn't have a lot of bones, but we can tell from those bones that it was a raptor, so we depict the rest of the body like a raptor. The top right part of this picture shows the bones we have found: www.krank.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Dakotaraptor-steini-skeletal-size-reconstruction.png The bottom left picture is what we can infer and this is what we can infer the animal looked like with soft tissue: saurian.maxmediacorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/rjpalmer_dakotaraptor_conceptart_001_by_arvalis-d9ev6iw.jpg Okay, is that enough info?
Thank you sooo much for names of reliable artists. It is a lot easier to find good quality if you know what you re looking for. And, side note, I just realized it has ben few long years sice dinosaurs feather update. Wonder how long till it replace current image, hope not 2 generations.
What would happen if you put a mating pair of arthropods in an oxygen rich tank and waited for a few generations? Would they grow huge? Someone test this, please, now I have to know.
unlike people and most animals insects are kinda like trees in that they will grow as big as their environment lets them, so they should increase in size within the first generation. This is not evolution at play. I have read about this and test have been done. I will try to find a link to something official but you can do a quick google search.
+Port Kapul _"unlike people and most animals insects are kinda like trees in that they will grow as big as their environment lets them"_ This is wrong. Most insects will only grow as large as their genes allow them to, first and foremost. Only then does environment play any sort of role. That being said, the extreme vast majority of insects will not continue to grow in size simply because of high oxygen availability because none of them have any genes left over from the millions upon millions of years of selective pressures in the absence of such high oxygen levels.
I know I am vastly simplifying things but I can't explain everything, especially on a topic I am not an expert. I was searching for something to quote and this will do "Dragonflies responded to the high oxygen levels, swelling to 15 percent larger than those reared in normal oxygen levels" research.asu.edu/stories/big-insects-provide-big-answers-about-oxygen While this study does show that not all insects increase in size with higher oxygen levels it does support my statement that insects will increase in size if environmental conditions allow.
SciShow, you keep showing the image first, for just a second and then give the explanation afterward. It would be more pleasant if you showing the image every once and a while when you explaining its features. And more images will be great
Insert a 0.5 or 1 second pause between segments. It feels too rushed. Sometimes he was talking about the next creature but there was no audible clue. No pauses to group segments/ideas makes it harder to follow.
ummmm they discovered that some prehistoric bacteria/microbe creates some kind of chemical substance while it metabolizes that can cure cancer, aids etc but the microbe cannot exist for too long in a test-tube so it needs its original host(s) which are the weird dinosaurs in this video, word got out of the project and sadly it was a project too ambitious and threatening for major pharmacy companies that thrive on the profit of expensive ineffective treatment that needs constant installments Using their money/influenece/corruption these pharmacy leaders got the president involved so as to shut down the operation and threatened their life if they did not cooperate, with their passion still in check they agreed with nods but in their hearts they had other plans. they decided to use all their life savings and got aid from others who believed in the potential of the project(in secret of course) the plan was to continue operation in a place where little or no humans trod(like some amazon or something) eventually a destination was set, it was on the island "ukygraewhiearewi"(i cant think of an exact place lol) they "moved in" deep deep into the lands with their heavy equipment etc and they successfully set up thanks to an escort called Roceth who stared them away from the grounds where the "uncontacted" tribe ujuk trod, after months/years they successfully recreated the habitat for the dinosaurs and started to work on the cure(s) but something went wrong and the dinosaurs went on a rampage destroying equipment etc, running for their life they crossed path with the savage meat loving ujuk tribe, being the savages they are the ujuk tribe took down the rampaging dinosaurs that were attacking the scientist. but the scientist were next to be attacked.. but thankfully Roceth was around and spoke their language, the tribe master trusted him and offered them refuge motivated to learn to defend themselves like the ujuk, the scientists adapted to their lifestyles etc some became comfortable and almost forgot about their old lives but this kindness backfired on the ujuk tribe as they fell ill and some even died from the common cold that the scientists brought to them , so the scientist now with new "tribe skills" made a plan to go back to the research grounds fighting dinosaurs on the way to provide the tribe with treatment and eventually leave the island and give up on their dream to sure the world the end :D
As someone who was a dino kid, I already knew about 90% of these (though I did learn some stuff because my memory is a bit fuzzy, and obviously scientists have learned more)
Important correction: actually many arthropods DO have circulatory systems. This includes chelicerates and crustaceans, for example (remember horseshoe crab blood?). Insects and myryapods (mostly) lack hemoglobin and hemocyanin, so those guys do rely on diffusion via their tracheae.
If i could add some information to a few of these 2. All Pterosaurs could walk on all their limbs, it was necessary for them to take off since they have strong arms for flight, they also used those arms for taking off, which is one of the many reasons they are allowed to get much larger than birds. Skim Feeding in water is impossible for any known Pterosaur, it would break the jaws with such force, Dip feeding is a much more likely candidate for any pterosaur that fed on fish. 5. A recent study shows that Glyptodons are infact armadillos ( www.bbc.com/news/35630712 and phys.org/news/2016-02-extinct-glyptodonts-gigantic-armadillos-ancient.html ) though DNA evidence. 8. I'm surprised you didn't mention the bones embedded in the skin that would act like chainmail.
This is the most offensive title I have ever seen. Why can't ALL animals be beautiful? When will this bias against prehistoric animals end?! #PrehistoricsAreBeautiful #YoureOnTheWrongSideOfHistorySpecificallyTwoHundredThousandYears
Millions of years from now it'll happen to us. When all the climate changes and asteroid strikes have changed earth and the dominant species, the platypus, does archeology, they'll laugh at the bill-less tail-less bipedal creatures they unearth.
This is incorrect. If the platypus/platypi/platypeople/platyWTF developed intelligence, they would look in the mirror, and just think "WTF is wrong with us?!?!?" and then kill themselves.
Caprikel I disagree. I've seen a guy on TV whose hair is ridiculous yet he never did the sensible thing and raze it down to the scalp and salt it so nothing else would grow. Clearly good taste is not evolutionarily necessary.
yay this video correctly called them "Saber Toothed-Cats". Thank you for getting science right. One thing that isn't right is suggesting that they used their teeth to puncture skulls. Their teeth were thin and very brittle, as evident from the numerous times broken sabers have been found.
I'm impressed--most videos on RUclips get evolution so horribly mangled it's hard to figure out where to start correcting them. This is a very well-researched video; thank you! I will say that your explanation for why these creatures no longer exist is at odds with the standard explanation in paleontology. It's not that these creatures were adapted for environments that no longer exist (though that was true of the Ediacaran/Vendian faunas--so weird we still have no idea what to do with them when we're being honest with ourselves!). Rather, it's that the organisms--for a myriad of reasons--that had these body plans died out. Unfortunately, we can't say precisely why; most likely there's no one reason. There's no reason to think that any of these body plans (outside the giant arthropods, anyway) wouldn't be viable today, if they had survived. This may sound trivial, but with the discovery of stromatolites on Mars (yeah, I know, it's tentative--but I'm willing to say I'm convinced if only to see how it's proven wrong!) and evidence of life on Titan (not STRONG evidence, but enough to make alien life there a very real possibility folks at NASA are looking into) it's important to remember that chance plays a HUGE role in life history. What we see now is only normal because it's what we see; other plants need not follow our evolutionary pathway, and even similar planets may hold life that is nearly incomprehensible to us.
+Marie Belfond Stop lying. You know damn well that evolution has been scientifically proven repeatedly. your statement makes you look foolish, stupid,or a religious nut case.
They can't literally fly for their whole lives; so all of them would have had to walk at some point; they may not all have been very good at it, or very fast; but they still had to walk sometimes!
Nothing personal, but especially since this video is titled _10 Strange-Looking Prehistoric Animals_, it would have been nice to show more of the prehistoric animals and less of the modern human.
TheLinnux1 what about it? An incredibly old myth first described in the epic of Gilgamesh and stolen for the book of genesis, an incredibly inaccurate, metaphor filled creation myth of a herding society?
hello, I bare no ill will, this was great and informative ! I learned a lot ! but, if I may suggest, it would have been nicer to see more pictures of the animals
a note on Pterosaurs, the current thought is that most walked on their forelimbs while on the ground, this would be less awkward for walking and would let them put their much more developed a arm muscles to use so they could minmax away the muscles on their rear legs. if so this would explain why they could get so much bigger than birds who have to be more balanced because even if birds don't spend a lot of time on the ground, they are still built to use their legs to take off.
You could make an episode about the mouth of Anomalocharis. I saw it in a documentary once like 20 years ago and I still have nightmares about it sometimes.
ok so, i love this channel. i want to see the pictures for longer than half a second please. i love the presenters, very nice, but also, pictures. please
I love these videos and the families of videos like them. I've noticed that they tend to lack good visuals though. You'll see the same artist renderings pop up over and over again - or one picture and then nothing. A large part of the wonderment is to imagine these creatures visually. It must be difficult to draw them from only a handful of bones, and might even be more misleading than realistic, but I wish we could see more variety there. It's probably time-consuming and expensive to have an artist take time to draw them though. So maybe if I could offer just one helpful tip, that won't add much complexity or cost and that I've seen used before on these shows. Take that one drawing and show the scale of the animal compared to a human, other dinosaurs, modern animals, etc. Show it in scale to what it eats. Give the animal more context than just the surface details. Also, any pictures of bones and the actual fossil evidence is very interesting as well, but that's also probably difficult to get. Anyways, love, love this content. Please keep it up!!
How can you do a list like this and not include Opabinia regalis? The thing had 5 eyes, a backwards facing mouth, a trunk with a "mouth" on the end of it to grab stuff, and was so bizarre that scientists laughed and thought it was a joke when it was first presented in a meeting.
Don’t forget Hallucigenia, a spiny worm from the same era so named because paleontologists thought they were hallucinating when they saw it.
He is just using popular animals for views
@@PLANET_ODREDS I'm sorry,but what?
@@williek08472 Hehe, at least for those two we, more or less, know what they are and where they fit into the animal kingdom. But what about Tullimonstrum? Even to this day, paleontologists don't agree on what it is and the speculations range from weird0 cephalopod with just one tentacle and the mouth placed at the end of it (WTF???), to really strange basal chordate (so something like a hagfish or lamprey, but very, very different, because its mouth is at the end of a trunk-like apendage and also has a sort of pincer-claw acting as a jaw, instead of no jaw at all, it has eyes on stocks and doesn't have the typical worm-shaped body plan that these creatures have) or even actual vertebrate (jawed fish)...somehow.
At least Opabinia doesn't actually have the mouth at the end of the trunk-like apendage, which is not something that can be said about Tullimonstrum, which evolved the same kind of structure, but in its case, the pincer-like grappling claw seems to actually have acted like a jaw and the trunk contained its esophagus... Oh, yeah, and its eyes were placed at the ends of of pretty long stocks facing to the sides...
P.S. Forgot to mention: it lived in the Carboniferous, not the Cambrian, and, also unlike Opabinia (which was established to be some kind of stem-arthoropod, at least) it has not, to this day, been definitively placed anywhere in the animal kingdom, because paleontologists don't seem to have the slightest clue on what the eff it was and only have speculations (cause its features are not compatible to any phylum of animal we know of).
"A platypus' mom probably thinks it's handsome." That's somehow really uplifting.
Wow these new pokemon looks pretty cool
Yeah i know. You know what they say gonna catch them all
#10 isn't a new pokemon, its an anorith.
I read this a day after some new Pokémon were unveiled. I was confused for a bit.
but those animals could work as new fossil poke in next gens, or just fans use those as bases for new ones.
These are way cooler than 99% of all the new pokemon released over theast decade
Videogame makers should take more advantage of real life fauna and flora, present and past.
There is no need to struggle to come up with fantastic designs when nature already did it!
The anomalacaris looks like something out of Spore as-is...
mistformsquirrel
Lol, I knew they reminded me of something!
Honestly when I saw that model of anomalacaris, I immediately thought of the Pokemon Anorith, but you are right it looks like something you can easily make in Spore.
TheFilthyCasual Actually, come to think of it, some of these show up in Ark: Survival Evolved. Not all of them, but I believe Quetzacoatlus, Glyptodon, and Megatherium are all present and, I think, tamable.
It's been awhile since I played mind, so I could be mis-remembering things a bit.
+mistformsquirrel yep and fairly accurate based on this video. Some assumptions made like the quetzal in the game does fly. But that's to be expected.
"YOU MIGHT THINK A PLATYPUS LOOKS WEIRD, BUT ITS MOM PROBABLY THINKS IT'S VERY HANDSOME."
that was the most important part of this video!
@@pingwingwi lol
Perry the platypus
I am now imagining a mother platypus adjusting her babies' clothes in preparation for a a professional family portrait.
I'm working at the Los Angeles Natural History Museum and we're having a pterosaur exhibit! So excited to teach people about Quetzalcoatlus!
Now say it's name 10 times on a row very quickly
Hatzegopteryx better💀
If that giant millipede were still around today, I'd gtfo & head to Mars or something
We'd have to nuke Earth from orbit. Its the only way to be sure.
what about the giant cockroaches on mars that are threatening humanity?
Don't be silly, you'd be completely comfortable about it because it would be the norm, but you'd probably fear it just as you would any other large carnivorous animal or insect.
Now, if it just "appeared" today, then yes people would be terrified.
Heck no, place a comfy chair on its back, hold a carrot in front of it, bam, awesome Millipede transportation xD
have you seen Terraformers? there are giant humanoid genocide-loving nazi cockroaches on mars.
Megatherium sounds like a good metal band name.
How about Theotherium?
... is it wrong that I want them to play slow grindy doom metal? It just fits the whole sloth thing.
Too much like Megadeth
I agree \m/
there's a metal song called To Mega Therion
Its cool how through billions of years of evolution, and even though the giants of the world are all thought to have lived long ago, the largest animal ever still lives on earth today.
And to think we almost killed it for oil
Well at least that we've discovered.
And we nearly wiped them out. We still don't know much about them. Strange how the world largest animal can be so elusive?
martinshoosterman
That we know of, for all we know there have been larger.
Wait, what are u referring to? Blue Whales maybe? There’s no clue as to what you’re talking about either in your comment or in the video!
The Glyptodon could also fart fire, and teleport two inches in any direction.
True Facts About the Armadildo. Whoops, that's a typo.
+Wing0Alchemist Whatever happened to Zefrank1?
Martin Rosenmuller
Dunno man. Wish he'd start uploading again, though. Guy's got a serious talent for comedy.
Sack_Tree
well thats a waste of talent.
I'd love more episodes on dinosaurs - they are so completely fascinating!
About #10: The most exciting discovery about anomalocariids in recent times is the discovery of a fossil from a German lagerstatte (a place with lots of really good fossils) that shows an Anomalocariid...in Devonian rock. So they lived for a hundred million years after we thought they went extinct.
Cool info about these weird creatures, and an entertaining presentation. Keep up the great work, Sci Show!
0:17 even though they found a living specimen, the discoverer of the platypus still thought it was a joke for a long time.
This was a fun video. I knew about most of these creatures, but never thought they were as strange as you described them to be.
I think that the Tullimonstrum (Tully Monster) is weirder looking than Anomalocaris
You guys need more images in videos like these. :) Excellent presentation regardless, love this show!
At one time in his life, Zoidberg looks like any of them.
Zoidberg is best dinosaur. I dont care if he's more of a Arthropod/Decopod, he's still best dinosaur.
Glyptodon also had a super reliable mid-size engine with really loud push rod valves.
"Imagine a dinosaur covered in feathers" so......a dinosaur?
Mossears133 lol
so most therapods* most sauropods aren't proven to have feathers.
[Walks in holding an unplucked chicken] BEHOLD! A DINOSAUR!
and so it was
BabaKoto brings back a memory of a very inaccurate reconstruction of a brachiosaurus where it was feathered and has a toucan beak lol it was so inaccurate and hilarious
Although there’s evidence to suggest most, if not all non-avian dinosaurs had some form of feathers, we’re still not 100% sure.
Meter long shrimp? We need to start a breeding program.
They were carnivores. Imagine a swarm of those things attacking you in the open sea.
Joachim Schoder I'll chance it as long as I kind find enough butter and garlic.
Jim Fortune
You might at the very least get a nice Darwin Award out of it!
***** Go ahead, crush my dreams!
+Joachim Schoder aren't Darwin awards awarded to people who stupidly died?
you guys didn't even mention that anomalocaris had a mouth they think opened and closed like a camera shutter...when the whole larger than microscopic life thing was new anything went I guess
I would have liked to see more different pictures of each creature!!! I want to get a good look at the different features being described, and I found myself having to Google search a good number of these babies!!!
with that said I LOVED this video, and I appreciate everything that ya'll do!
A lot of these I recognize from Ice Age 😂😂
These are some of my favorite scishow videos. Prehistoric animals, and especially the ones to do with early humans!
I knew like 9 out of 10 of those things so I feel proud of myself!
i knew all 10 someone help me
+Chupacabra Gaming
I still don't know any of them. I spent the entire video reading comments. 8^)
Hillary For Prison 2016
Go IntoTheCalm yea
I knew all 10 of them.
And then you cry alone in your sleep surrounded by useless trivia about dinosaurs. It's okay, buddy. I know a bunch of useless trivia too.
In the future could you show the pictures of the critters a bit longer? You show it so fast and lose it and just talk about it, when you could leave it up as you describe and explain it so the image sticks a bit better. I kept having to pause and go back and even google extra images to get a good idea of what they really looked like.
Either way, good video as always. I love SciShow.
Those Quetzalcoatlus and Therizinosaurus pictures are terribly inaccurate. Normally, I wouldn't get mad, but this is a science channel.
Reference more accurate pictures then?
According to current knowledge, they are. But there aren't many people redrawing every extinct animal as our understanding changes. Not to mention quality of such pictures - I am not surprised they used nice looking vs "still-not-outdated" sketch. It's popular science thing, like thinking our genom changes only by mutations.
Okay, first of all, they're shrinkwrapped. That basically means that the artist decided to give no discretion to what the soft tissues might have looked like. In a real animal, the skeleton is not as pronounced and obvious. This is especially obvious in the Quetzalcoatlus pictures, and to a lesser extent in the Therizinosaurus picture. Also, we can tell from phylogenetic bracketing that it would have had pycnofibres (or feathers, depending on where you put the origin of feathers) which would have looked like a protofuzz. Here is a picture of what they would actually look like (this is coming from not only a skilled artist, but also a palaeontologist): 4.bp.blogspot.com/-OHUhOSWhvIE/Vzdmod7tj2I/AAAAAAAACIQ/V1us1HAbBwkOzle-yon82hgqdYx3DXnmwCK4B/s1600/Quetz%2Bsp.%2BWitton%2B2016%2Blow%2Bres.jpg
The Therizinosaurus has less problems. First, the smallest problem is the feathering. It looks like it just had feathers pasted onto the featherless body, which makes no sense. You could make the argument that it would overheat the creature, but its feathers would be advanced enough in order to bypass that problem. The biggest problem are the arms. First of all, the arms are clearly not bulky enough to hold up those claws. Second of all, the hands shouldn't look like that. We can now tell that the muscles in the arms would make it impossible to hold their hands like that. They would keep their hands perpetually in a way that would make them look like they were clapping. Finally, the wings need to be bigger and extend to the second finger. Here's a good picture of a Therizinosaurus ( The theropod in the picture isn't accurate, but the Therizinosaurus is): pre13.deviantart.net/5527/th/pre/f/2012/258/5/d/canada_therizinosaurus_by_stygimolochspinifer-d5eswfo.png
While we're here, I guess I'll critique all of the animals in this video.
The first picture of Stegosaurus is good. The Dimetrodon could use some updating. The top of the spines would probably be exposed, leading to a half-sail look. The stance is kind of outdated. They would have probably walked more like this:img14.deviantart.net/c40a/i/2015/178/5/5/the_walking_dimetrodon_season_1_to_3_by_traheripteryx-d8yzkma.png
Also, more mammalian features are certainly possible. Here's a good (but speculative) picture of a Dimetrodon: orig07.deviantart.net/ba0d/f/2015/205/c/5/dimetrodon_giganhomogenes_by_traheripteryx-d92mixx.png
Also, this picture is a little outdated, because now we know that the half-sail look was more like a 75%sail look. The exposed vertebrae would be very small.
The Microraptor looks very good.
The second picture is bad. First of all, it has way too little feathering. Second of all, the color is wrong. In very well-preserved fossils, we can see melanosomes which tell us the color of the animal. This is very, very rare. Though, we found it for Microraptor, which tells us that it had black, crow-like feathers, and it had an iridescence, similar to modern crows. Also, the picture looks way more like a "lizard with bird wings" than "weird, four winged crow". Here's a better picture: emilywilloughby.com/gallery-data/images/full/microraptor-takeoff.jpg
I don't know a lot about Glyptodons, and there weren't any pictures shown, anyway.
The Macrauchenia looks good.
Platybelodon looks good.
No pictures were shown of Megatherium.
I actually really like the Anomalocaris picture. Considering that little else had eyes at the time, it would make sense for them to have bright colors since camouflage wouldn't be a problem.
All of the info is good. Though, I'm a bit dissapointed that Deinocheirus (img08.deviantart.net/71c9/i/2014/320/0/4/don_t_mess_with_deinocheirus_by_durbed-d84x94w.jpg) and Yi Qi (upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Yi_qi_restoration.jpg) weren't mentioned!
Also, there is a lot of good art of accurate dinosaurs. You just need to know where to find them. John Conway, Emily Willoughby, C.M. Koseman, R.J. Palmer, Mark Witton, and more are all good artists who make accurate dinosaurs.
P.S. Phylogenetic bracketing is basically taking what you know about a certain animal and applying it to other ones which are closely related. This won't always be right (in the case of Spinosaurus), but it can certainly help us figure out what prehistoric animals look like. Most animals have very fragmentary fossils and not a lot of fossils, so the only way to create what they looked like is to look at other animals. For example, we only know Dakotaraptor from one fossil found very recently, which doesn't have a lot of bones, but we can tell from those bones that it was a raptor, so we depict the rest of the body like a raptor. The top right part of this picture shows the bones we have found: www.krank.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Dakotaraptor-steini-skeletal-size-reconstruction.png
The bottom left picture is what we can infer and this is what we can infer the animal looked like with soft tissue: saurian.maxmediacorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/rjpalmer_dakotaraptor_conceptart_001_by_arvalis-d9ev6iw.jpg
Okay, is that enough info?
Thank you sooo much for names of reliable artists. It is a lot easier to find good quality if you know what you re looking for. And, side note, I just realized it has ben few long years sice dinosaurs feather update. Wonder how long till it replace current image, hope not 2 generations.
+5raptorboy1 Ayyyyyy you're cool
What would happen if you put a mating pair of arthropods in an oxygen rich tank and waited for a few generations? Would they grow huge? Someone test this, please, now I have to know.
unlike people and most animals insects are kinda like trees in that they will grow as big as their environment lets them, so they should increase in size within the first generation. This is not evolution at play. I have read about this and test have been done. I will try to find a link to something official but you can do a quick google search.
Port Kapul
In the case you are correct this is reassuring
+Port Kapul _"unlike people and most animals insects are kinda like trees in that they will grow as big as their environment lets them"_
This is wrong. Most insects will only grow as large as their genes allow them to, first and foremost. Only then does environment play any sort of role. That being said, the extreme vast majority of insects will not continue to grow in size simply because of high oxygen availability because none of them have any genes left over from the millions upon millions of years of selective pressures in the absence of such high oxygen levels.
I know I am vastly simplifying things but I can't explain everything, especially on a topic I am not an expert. I was searching for something to quote and this will do "Dragonflies responded to the high oxygen levels, swelling to 15 percent larger than those reared in normal oxygen levels" research.asu.edu/stories/big-insects-provide-big-answers-about-oxygen
While this study does show that not all insects increase in size with higher oxygen levels it does support my statement that insects will increase in size if environmental conditions allow.
Evolution is based on chance and need, not need and want
SciShow, you keep showing the image first, for just a second and then give the explanation afterward. It would be more pleasant if you showing the image every once and a while when you explaining its features. And more images will be great
7788um I agree these things are interesting , I d like a better look too!
Insert a 0.5 or 1 second pause between segments. It feels too rushed. Sometimes he was talking about the next creature but there was no audible clue. No pauses to group segments/ideas makes it harder to follow.
Some animations showing how these adaptations worked would be very nice.
was number 10 the great ancestor of Dr. Zoidburg?
I want a Jurassic Park 5 with all these weird dinosaurs! I wonderwhat the storyline could be
ummmm they discovered that some prehistoric bacteria/microbe creates some kind of chemical substance while it metabolizes that can cure cancer, aids etc but the microbe cannot exist for too long in a test-tube so it needs its original host(s) which are the weird dinosaurs in this video, word got out of the project and sadly it was a project too ambitious and threatening for major pharmacy companies that thrive on the profit of expensive ineffective treatment that needs constant installments
Using their money/influenece/corruption these pharmacy leaders got the president involved so as to shut down the operation and threatened their life if they did not cooperate, with their passion still in check they agreed with nods but in their hearts they had other plans. they decided to use all their life savings and got aid from others who believed in the potential of the project(in secret of course) the plan was to continue operation in a place where little or no humans trod(like some amazon or something)
eventually a destination was set, it was on the island "ukygraewhiearewi"(i cant think of an exact place lol) they "moved in" deep deep into the lands with their heavy equipment etc and they successfully set up thanks to an escort called Roceth who stared them away from the grounds where the "uncontacted" tribe ujuk trod, after months/years they successfully recreated the habitat for the dinosaurs and started to work on the cure(s)
but something went wrong and the dinosaurs went on a rampage destroying equipment etc, running for their life they crossed path with the savage meat loving ujuk tribe, being the savages they are the ujuk tribe took down the rampaging dinosaurs that were attacking the scientist. but the scientist were next to be attacked.. but thankfully Roceth was around and spoke their language, the tribe master trusted him and offered them refuge
motivated to learn to defend themselves like the ujuk, the scientists adapted to their lifestyles etc some became comfortable and almost forgot about their old lives but this kindness backfired on the ujuk tribe as they fell ill and some even died from the common cold that the scientists brought to them , so the scientist now with new "tribe skills" made a plan to go back to the research grounds fighting dinosaurs on the way to provide the tribe with treatment and eventually leave the island and give up on their dream to sure the world the end :D
Or you could play ARK:Survival Evolved even if the dino facts are WRONG.
+assefa hanson you lost me at ummmmm sorry to long to read
***** you cant make a script/storyline in 3 sentences lol, if he asked for a premise sentence then that could be 1 sentence
+assefa hanson oh
after working on this show for years, the amount of knowledge these guys n girls must have accumulated must be insane
As someone who was a dino kid, I already knew about 90% of these (though I did learn some stuff because my memory is a bit fuzzy, and obviously scientists have learned more)
Same
Same, I knew them all except for #5 and #7.
That's a pretty cool emu in your avatar
The only one I didn't know about was the elephant ancestor.
Well I was a human kid but, just like an actor I admire, I too liked dinosaurs and other ancient creatures. Thus I too knew about some of these.
10 strange-looking Prehistoric Animals? I LOVE strange-looking prehistoric animals! Great video as always.
12000-3mil years ago....a bit specific don't you think?
A lot of that time also includes how long the animal lasted from/until.
Nah
Important correction: actually many arthropods DO have circulatory systems. This includes chelicerates and crustaceans, for example (remember horseshoe crab blood?). Insects and myryapods (mostly) lack hemoglobin and hemocyanin, so those guys do rely on diffusion via their tracheae.
Dude, the number ten is obviously an Anorith; it's a Pokémon, duh.
Ermagherd a red Anorith! Wait...
What kind of stupid name for a pokemon is Armaldo? Sounds more like the name of a guy you'd buy food from in Bogota.
***** I know, but still.
Hey don't insult my country bruh! Also I think the name comes from the word Armor,which is something that it has.
There's no Pokémon called Anorith, though.
I knew about a lot of these. Thanks, Dinosaur Train!
(And a book called Over 1000 animal facts did most of it.)
If i could add some information to a few of these
2. All Pterosaurs could walk on all their limbs, it was necessary for them to take off since they have strong arms for flight, they also used those arms for taking off, which is one of the many reasons they are allowed to get much larger than birds. Skim Feeding in water is impossible for any known Pterosaur, it would break the jaws with such force, Dip feeding is a much more likely candidate for any pterosaur that fed on fish.
5. A recent study shows that Glyptodons are infact armadillos ( www.bbc.com/news/35630712 and phys.org/news/2016-02-extinct-glyptodonts-gigantic-armadillos-ancient.html ) though DNA evidence.
8. I'm surprised you didn't mention the bones embedded in the skin that would act like chainmail.
I couldn't help but listen to every time he took a breath.
once I noticed it, I couldn't unhear it.
#evolution
#creation
#trump
#chuthulu
trump is devolution
#HillaryForPrison
2: literally a Wyvern
10: literally that thing everyone made in stage 1 of spore
Why do I think "Pokémon" when I watch these beasts?
There needs to be a Therizinosaurus Pokemon eventually.
I think anorith is based on the last one, but i'm not sure ;w;
Definitely.
Helicopteron or whatever needs to be a thing. BUZZSAWROBOSHARK!
I was thinking Archeops was based on that microraptor.
I love Michael Aranda and I love weird dinosaurs. This was great.
This is the most offensive title I have ever seen. Why can't ALL animals be beautiful? When will this bias against prehistoric animals end?! #PrehistoricsAreBeautiful #YoureOnTheWrongSideOfHistorySpecificallyTwoHundredThousandYears
Millions of years from now it'll happen to us. When all the climate changes and asteroid strikes have changed earth and the dominant species, the platypus, does archeology, they'll laugh at the bill-less tail-less bipedal creatures they unearth.
This is incorrect. If the platypus/platypi/platypeople/platyWTF developed intelligence, they would look in the mirror, and just think "WTF is wrong with us?!?!?" and then kill themselves.
Caprikel I disagree. I've seen a guy on TV whose hair is ridiculous yet he never did the sensible thing and raze it down to the scalp and salt it so nothing else would grow. Clearly good taste is not evolutionarily necessary.
+Koopix Actually, I think you'll find it's one of the, "most dumb".
So many people don't get the joke/sarcasm...
THANK YOU the only video that actually talked about theriznosaurs
the host is a freaking baaaaaaabbbbeeeee ♡
yay this video correctly called them "Saber Toothed-Cats". Thank you for getting science right. One thing that isn't right is suggesting that they used their teeth to puncture skulls. Their teeth were thin and very brittle, as evident from the numerous times broken sabers have been found.
You think anomalocaris was weird? You should see opabimia.
Interesting vid, could have used more pic tho. Keep it up sci show :)
Maybe keep the picture up longer so we can see what he is talking about.
I love Edge, its always got the weird, strange and unusual on it. Very interesting to me. Thanx
This man's hair should've been number 10.
I'm impressed--most videos on RUclips get evolution so horribly mangled it's hard to figure out where to start correcting them. This is a very well-researched video; thank you!
I will say that your explanation for why these creatures no longer exist is at odds with the standard explanation in paleontology. It's not that these creatures were adapted for environments that no longer exist (though that was true of the Ediacaran/Vendian faunas--so weird we still have no idea what to do with them when we're being honest with ourselves!). Rather, it's that the organisms--for a myriad of reasons--that had these body plans died out. Unfortunately, we can't say precisely why; most likely there's no one reason. There's no reason to think that any of these body plans (outside the giant arthropods, anyway) wouldn't be viable today, if they had survived.
This may sound trivial, but with the discovery of stromatolites on Mars (yeah, I know, it's tentative--but I'm willing to say I'm convinced if only to see how it's proven wrong!) and evidence of life on Titan (not STRONG evidence, but enough to make alien life there a very real possibility folks at NASA are looking into) it's important to remember that chance plays a HUGE role in life history. What we see now is only normal because it's what we see; other plants need not follow our evolutionary pathway, and even similar planets may hold life that is nearly incomprehensible to us.
"The teeth belonged in the jaw..."
Shark skin: Hold my beer.
I think Michael Aranda is one of my favs on Scishow!
Evolution is an odd thing
because it false
+Marie Belfond really. freaking stupid. im christian and beleive in evolution. it is real so ur straight dumb.
you're funny, Marie
+Marie Belfond Stop lying. You know damn well that evolution has been scientifically proven repeatedly. your statement makes you look foolish, stupid,or a religious nut case.
+Marie Belfond please...adults are talking
Thanks for delivering such interesting information with such sexiness Mr. Arranda 🤟
For #2, ALL pterosaurs walked like that!!!
not all pterasaurs walked though
They can't literally fly for their whole lives; so all of them would have had to walk at some point; they may not all have been very good at it, or very fast; but they still had to walk sometimes!
+Argolf Exactly, he/she/it gets it!
Ben Steinhart If you're referring to me; I'm a he!
+Argolf Sorry, HE.
#5 and #6 are in the second Ice Age movie and you just don't know how happy that makes me
A Haiku for Quetzalcoatlus:
Quetzalcoatlus
Not only a dinosaur
Grandpa of Big Bird
Jeremy J. Quetzalcoatlus is not a dinosaur. It is a pterosaur. Those two are not the same thing.
Not only a dinosaur?!?!? It wasn't a dinosaur, so it wasn't a bird o related to birds...
Awesome episode!
yeeet!! a shout out to idaho!!!
Microraptor Gui is my favorite dinosaur. I love its name and its look and I love teaching them to everyone I know~
A lot of these are in the game Ark Survival Evolved haha!
you dont say my mate *hohohoho*
And they r all wrong haha!
NecrosVideos You here?!? 😁😁
Ark makes me glad that micro Raptors are extinct..
@@ethanrichards2053 same as arthropluera, but that's just me... XD
love this. more please.
HERE CUME THE GIANT BEE MOVIE BUG'-' 🌟🌟best joke ever
B-Movie, as in a low budget and fairly rubbish film, not a film about bees.
Already exists, "The Swarm" and "The Bees" both 1978.
I really love this buzzfeed video.
Nothing personal, but especially since this video is titled _10 Strange-Looking Prehistoric Animals_, it would have been nice to show more of the prehistoric animals and less of the modern human.
Wow. A lot more dinos than I realized. And the blond lock is back!
Interesting video, BUT too much time showing the guy, and very short time of the species' images.!!!
Should be the other way around.!!!
One of my favorite weird prehistoric fauna is Meganeura, an eagle sized dragonfly.
Ark anybody?
TheLinnux1 what about it? An incredibly old myth first described in the epic of Gilgamesh and stolen for the book of genesis, an incredibly inaccurate, metaphor filled creation myth of a herding society?
Vikings488
Ark: Survival Evolved.
It's a game.
hello, I bare no ill will, this was great and informative ! I learned a lot ! but, if I may suggest, it would have been nicer to see more pictures of the animals
can you freaking keep pictures up longer and not so blurrred out
excellent episode
so much of these things are in Ark
FINALLY. Someone who gives there sources.
So almost all the animals here are in Ark
loved this subject!!!!
ARK
« Is weird but his mum probably finds him very handsome »... very true of the presenters of Scishow :)
a note on Pterosaurs, the current thought is that most walked on their forelimbs while on the ground, this would be less awkward for walking and would let them put their much more developed a arm muscles to use so they could minmax away the muscles on their rear legs. if so this would explain why they could get so much bigger than birds who have to be more balanced because even if birds don't spend a lot of time on the ground, they are still built to use their legs to take off.
You could make an episode about the mouth of Anomalocharis. I saw it in a documentary once like 20 years ago and I still have nightmares about it sometimes.
ok so, i love this channel. i want to see the pictures for longer than half a second please. i love the presenters, very nice, but also, pictures. please
Hey! The Glyptodon was in Ice Age. So that's what that turtle thing was.
I love these videos and the families of videos like them. I've noticed that they tend to lack good visuals though. You'll see the same artist renderings pop up over and over again - or one picture and then nothing. A large part of the wonderment is to imagine these creatures visually. It must be difficult to draw them from only a handful of bones, and might even be more misleading than realistic, but I wish we could see more variety there. It's probably time-consuming and expensive to have an artist take time to draw them though. So maybe if I could offer just one helpful tip, that won't add much complexity or cost and that I've seen used before on these shows. Take that one drawing and show the scale of the animal compared to a human, other dinosaurs, modern animals, etc. Show it in scale to what it eats. Give the animal more context than just the surface details. Also, any pictures of bones and the actual fossil evidence is very interesting as well, but that's also probably difficult to get.
Anyways, love, love this content. Please keep it up!!
This is the best top 10 channel and its not even a top 10 channel.
Platybelodon and Anomalocaris are two of my favorite prehistoric animals just because of how crazy they were.
Dinosaurs are amazing ! I love all Dino stuff =D
8:29
A wild Anorith appeared!
Love this video.
Interesting vid, could have used more pics tho. Keep it up sci show :).
Interesting stuff! They should keep the picture of the cool animal in a sidebar or something while he talks.
Good show! :-)
Anomalocaris looks so much like the Fossil Pokemon Anorith. I guess that's where it got its inspiration in appearance and name.