House Church Part. 2. Understanding the traditional (non House Church) structure.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 4

  • @colvinator1611
    @colvinator1611 6 месяцев назад +3

    Excellent video , Excellent TRUTH ! My King James Bible clearly says that Almighty God does not dwell in temples made with hands. Acts 6 , 7 , 17 , Hebrews 8 & 9.
    My Bible also tells me that temple worship / sacrifice and the priesthood were completely abolished by the Lord Jesus Christ at Calvary. In my view, the denominations are varieties of the catholic cult model.

  • @jaireidca
    @jaireidca 6 месяцев назад

    Churches in North America are non-profit by definition. I’ve never heard of a church charging people for access to a pastor. That said, they do have more costs than a house church model. The problem I see with the house church model is a) that the leadership is untrained and often gets off track and doesn’t challenge the group consistently or understand the dangers to the church b) groups don’t last very long - and when they dissolve many don’t end up finding a new one and are “lone rangers” c) they tend to be unbalanced - either they are formed around a particular purpose (and so don’t have the full purposes of the church in view) or they are formed around relationships and therefore they have no critical mass in order to do anything effectively (because only one person in the group is ever really passionate about a cause). d) this is assuming that the leadership is relatively healthy - some house churches also become cultish.

  • @OHHSJEP.ForGODsake
    @OHHSJEP.ForGODsake 6 месяцев назад +2

    Its church-ianity ❌️ when it should be Christ-ianity✅️

    • @hiltonchapman4844
      @hiltonchapman4844 6 месяцев назад

      Yes, but I wonder if these goofs can understand that.
      HC-JAIPUR (29/04/2024)
      .
      Just to be fair to you, I'm Roman Catholic.
      HC