Let's remember, the architect of this insanity was a flawed man a profound hypocrite. Had a PhD in philosophy and could not get an academic job because of his bizarre theories. He was so lazy that two of his five children died of malnutrition related illnesses because he refused to get a job. He hated the bourgeoisie, but his wife was a burgeose. He hated Capitalism, but allowed Engel, the son of an industrialist, to support him and his family. Also, lived in the UK, a Capitalist country. From then on his malevolence, flawed character, terrible economist, and his profoundly naive psychology have cost over 100 million deaths, and still counting. Still want to be a useful idiot?
Most philosophers across history had extremely distasteful aspects about them - to say people can't learn from the works of people who personally had distastefulness is to reject almost every philosopher to exist
First of all thanks Gowtham ji for commenting on my video 🙏 I'm just a new RUclipsr who trying to get a little bit recognition from this but yes "That's a great point. It's essential to recognize the complexity of historical figures and appreciate their contributions while acknowledging their flaws. Learning from their ideas doesn't mean condoning their personal shortcomings."
Less competent should refrain from judging those who are more competent. The effectiveness of judgment would greatly improve if biases were eliminated. It's important to recognize that every person faces varying opinions in this world, and no one is perfect. Moreover, three days is too short a period to judge the great figures of an era who have significantly impacted the lives of workers. Always strive to focus on the positive aspects, and I appreciate your effort in doing so.
When karl wrote that book that time capitalist induced famines killed millions in Ireland (similar to bengal famines ).He and Adam smith are actually very similar when it comes to Businessman.They both say that they must be controlled and kept away from politics and decision making . Also, its true the bathing was rich people business in Europe because it needed hot water which poor people cant afford .Its similar to mr.gandhi not wearing clothes to show solidarity with poor .Similarly , Yogi adityanath didn't attend his parents last rites due to ideology(monk) . Its not wrong in anyways ,he did what he said . Karl marx is right about all the problems of capitalism ,his solution however are not correct . And even if he was wrong and was a terrible man then also its fine because Almost all great people are terrible man ,including einstien ,hawking. He forced free education ,free food , free healthcare ,ensured labor rights etc.on whole world that counts as positive in my book. He has lot of other problems though please bring that to light, please study and then make videos on his real problems
I recommend you a recently released movie - 'Bastar The Naxal Story' it's a must watched thriller movie based on real-life incident of Naxals in Chattisgarh. The movie is about the Naxalite-Maoist insurgency in the Bastar district of Chhattisgarh, which began in 1910.
Debunking your absurd and unfounded claims: "Bathing is bourgeoisie" - There is no credible evidence that Karl Marx ever said this. It's a blatant fabrication. "He let his father down by not becoming a lawyer" - If parents push their children into careers they have no passion for, it's their fault, not the child's. "He didn't attend his father's funeral" - As you mentioned at the start, Karl Marx did not strictly adhere to communist principles. His absence at his father's funeral was likely due to ideological differences, given his father's bourgeois background. It's also important to note that attending a funeral does not inherently define a person's character. "Karl Marx had an illegitimate child with his maid who was unpaid" - This claim is a conspiracy theory without credible sources, as confirmed by information available on reputable platforms like Wikipedia. By spreading misinformation and fabricating facts about acclaimed philosophers like Karl Marx, whose works inspire millions to envision a society free from the divisions of capitalism, class, and religion, you not only undermine Marx's intellectual legacy but also disparage the profound influence he had on revolutionaries such as Rosa Luxemburg, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, and Vladimir Lenin. These individuals, motivated by Marx's ideas, sought to challenge and transform oppressive systems worldwide.
Yes Moses Mordecai Levy, also known as Mordecai Manuel Noah (1785-1851), was an American playwright, diplomat, and journalist. He is notable for his advocacy for Jewish rights and his efforts to establish a Jewish homeland in the United States during the early 19th century. Noah envisioned a refuge for Jews fleeing persecution, proposing an autonomous Jewish state on Grand Island in the Niagara River. His efforts, however, did not come to fruition, but he remains a significant figure in Jewish American history.
Mere pitaji ek "jews" thein. Quite shows your comprehension skills. Btw Marx is the reason why world shifted from 2000 years of feudalism coupled with monarchy to democracy in last 200 years. Rise of capitalism (liberal market) is offset of democratic system. The capitalism he rejected was feudalism.
Do you really think that because of karl Marx the world shifted from monarchy to democracy really???? Nd btw you have to understand that feudalism was a complex system that served societal needs at the time it existed, providing stability and organization in a decentralized manner..........and YES uske pitaji ek jews the thats why he didn't visit hes father's funeral
@@khushalanipuneet revolution under Lenin did had an impact in changing the world order just like French revolution. While French revolution occured without banner of Marxism, Russian revolution didn't. Nationalism was a force post 1900. I know feudalism and it's complexity. Indeed barter system was a need of a particular time, but society did change from barter system. What's the point with "feudalism was a need". When did I deny that? Point is we progressed away from it. Marx had its role. World was divided into first, second and third world countries in the name of Marx and how much Marxist principal they imbibed in their policy. Even first world country today provides free education and healthcare (confluence of Marxism with liberal market is socialist policy) . regarding other two group of countries, impact is much more.
@@khushalanipuneet ek "Jews" nhi hota bhai. Angrezi seekh le, padai karle. Ek "jew" hota hai. Khair, not the comprehension I was intending to focus upon.
@@himesh5869 one thing I'm completely sure about you you're from Kerala a failed communist state a typical bad mouthed wannabe cool American , 2nd Jew and Jews are commonly used to describe individuals or groups who follow Judaism 3rd the most important, english bolne se aap cool to hojaoge lekin civilized aur educated nahi
@@khushalanipuneet again guessed like an intellectual. I'm from UP, living in Gurgaon and running a tech startup. Secondly, check out how many labour go to Kerala and check out HDI indicator and you can see where other states stand infront of Kerala. Do your own research and we talk. Thirdly, jew is singular. Jews is plural, denotes a group. English pe toh I wasnt even pressing the point but wanted you to reiterate on the points I presented. You clearly don't have idea on world order and influence of Marx in socio economic and political scenario.
Are bhai most of the developed countries and democratic countries follow this theory only mix of capitalism and socialism. Communsim is the last stage of marxism and no country could even communsit countries like russia couldnt get to the third stage. Duniya mein to type ke socialism hote hai democratic socialism and marxist socialist. Democratic socialism is found in countries like usa , uk, india , marxist socialism mein to dusre stage aneke baad the countries instead of entering the third stage that is communism, gets diverted to become dictatorship.
I am no left follower but knowing you are new to youtube lemme help so that you could improve and establish yourself here. 1st thing, this video does not have a constructive criticism. Koi admi jo apne personal space me gandagi se rahta hai ussey tum kaise uske works ke merit kojudge kar sakte ho. Gandhi ji ki autobiography padhna tab pata lagega ki vo bi bahut gande admi the, lekin unhone kitna bada kaam kiya, vaise swami Vivekananda ne bi bahut galat kam kiye hai, lekin vo phir bi mahaan hai, aise bahut se examole hai. Koi prostitute agar sex work karti hai to iska mtlb ye nahi ki uske andar swabiman ya mahanta nahi ho sakti hai. Tumhare andar abi rationality ki aur logical reasoning ki thodi Kami hai lekin try karte raho you will improve. I would suggest you to please follow acharya Prashant.
Bourgeois is poonjipati? Dude first learn the meaning of the term. Bourgeois is a term used for the middle class, the new class emergent in a new world order. Poonjipati capitalist hote hai bourgeois nahi. Actually came to see what your argument is but this immediately put me off and I am no Marx fan or anything.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Mamushi (Remix) [feat. TWICE] [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5c0_u9PsrsQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Let's remember, the architect of this insanity was a flawed man a profound hypocrite. Had a PhD in philosophy and could not get an academic job because of his bizarre theories. He was so lazy that two of his five children died of malnutrition related illnesses because he refused to get a job. He hated the bourgeoisie, but his wife was a burgeose. He hated Capitalism, but allowed Engel, the son of an industrialist, to support him and his family. Also, lived in the UK, a Capitalist country. From then on his malevolence, flawed character, terrible economist, and his profoundly naive psychology have cost over 100 million deaths, and still counting. Still want to be a useful idiot?
World me 2 types of people h ek Jo Karl Mark ko follow karte and ek Jo nhi karte .
And tum dusra wala ho.
That's it.
If you think you are a intellectual guy then don't study or else appne aaukat mein rahakar
@@insideamovie9912 nahi to kya karlega ??
@@khushalanipuneet that shows how intelligent you are & that will be all my lord. Thanks!
U said na apni aukat mein reh to mein reh Raha hu apni aukat mein
3 din ka research😂😂😂😂... Seriously bro
Dude it's 2024 aur upar se chatgpt ne kaam aur asaan kar diya
Ha kuchh bhi video bna do kuchh bhi bol do, bewkuf lag rhe ho..
Most philosophers across history had extremely distasteful aspects about them - to say people can't learn from the works of people who personally had distastefulness is to reject almost every philosopher to exist
First of all thanks Gowtham ji for commenting on my video 🙏 I'm just a new RUclipsr who trying to get a little bit recognition from this
but yes "That's a great point. It's essential to recognize the complexity of historical figures and appreciate their contributions while acknowledging their flaws. Learning from their ideas doesn't mean condoning their personal shortcomings."
Good article, please share the source...
😂😂
😂 no limits to stupidity 😂
Kanhaiya Kumar bhi aisa hi h...dhruv rathi bas nahata h to isliye wo different h ..but thoda sa
Bhai mughe lagta hai wo dono nahi nahate 😆😂
Bhai free market ke favour mai ke log bhi Karl Marx ka naam aur kaaam respect se lete hai
Current affairs? It was 200 years ago.
It's just for referring so the video goes to the more curiosity minds for growing the channel
you have no idea what you are talking about
Then please enlighten me,
the comment section is all yours
this man embodies the tragedy of internet
Less competent should refrain from judging those who are more competent. The effectiveness of judgment would greatly improve if biases were eliminated. It's important to recognize that every person faces varying opinions in this world, and no one is perfect. Moreover, three days is too short a period to judge the great figures of an era who have significantly impacted the lives of workers. Always strive to focus on the positive aspects, and I appreciate your effort in doing so.
He was a hypocrite.
Yes he was........ very
Great video! Love from Australia
Thanks a lot sir 🙏
When karl wrote that book that time capitalist induced famines killed millions in Ireland (similar to bengal famines ).He and Adam smith are actually very similar when it comes to Businessman.They both say that they must be controlled and kept away from politics and decision making .
Also, its true the bathing was rich people business in Europe because it needed hot water which poor people cant afford .Its similar to mr.gandhi not wearing clothes to show solidarity with poor .Similarly , Yogi adityanath didn't attend his parents last rites due to ideology(monk) .
Its not wrong in anyways ,he did what he said .
Karl marx is right about all the problems of capitalism ,his solution however are not correct .
And even if he was wrong and was a terrible man then also its fine because Almost all great people are terrible man ,including einstien ,hawking.
He forced free education ,free food , free healthcare ,ensured labor rights etc.on whole world that counts as positive in my book.
He has lot of other problems though please bring that to light, please study and then make videos on his real problems
I recommend you a recently released movie - 'Bastar The Naxal Story' it's a must watched thriller movie based on real-life incident of Naxals in Chattisgarh. The movie is about the Naxalite-Maoist insurgency in the Bastar district of Chhattisgarh, which began in 1910.
Debunking your absurd and unfounded claims:
"Bathing is bourgeoisie" - There is no credible evidence that Karl Marx ever said this. It's a blatant fabrication.
"He let his father down by not becoming a lawyer" - If parents push their children into careers they have no passion for, it's their fault, not the child's.
"He didn't attend his father's funeral" - As you mentioned at the start, Karl Marx did not strictly adhere to communist principles. His absence at his father's funeral was likely due to ideological differences, given his father's bourgeois background. It's also important to note that attending a funeral does not inherently define a person's character.
"Karl Marx had an illegitimate child with his maid who was unpaid" - This claim is a conspiracy theory without credible sources, as confirmed by information available on reputable platforms like Wikipedia.
By spreading misinformation and fabricating facts about acclaimed philosophers like Karl Marx, whose works inspire millions to envision a society free from the divisions of capitalism, class, and religion, you not only undermine Marx's intellectual legacy but also disparage the profound influence he had on revolutionaries such as Rosa Luxemburg, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, and Vladimir Lenin. These individuals, motivated by Marx's ideas, sought to challenge and transform oppressive systems worldwide.
thanks a lot for clarification
99 missed calls from dhruv rathi
@@khushalanipuneet 109 missed call from abhi and neooo
Instead of fiing though google , but books and read like das capital
Being a philosopher is useless! Logic died!
Still trying to find the hypocrisy in the video
When u talk about carl marx u should keep in mind that he was talking about that era and living standards of people.
His real name was Moses Mordechai Levy.
Yes Moses Mordecai Levy, also known as Mordecai Manuel Noah (1785-1851), was an American playwright, diplomat, and journalist. He is notable for his advocacy for Jewish rights and his efforts to establish a Jewish homeland in the United States during the early 19th century. Noah envisioned a refuge for Jews fleeing persecution, proposing an autonomous Jewish state on Grand Island in the Niagara River. His efforts, however, did not come to fruition, but he remains a significant figure in Jewish American history.
Mere pitaji ek "jews" thein.
Quite shows your comprehension skills.
Btw Marx is the reason why world shifted from 2000 years of feudalism coupled with monarchy to democracy in last 200 years. Rise of capitalism (liberal market) is offset of democratic system. The capitalism he rejected was feudalism.
Do you really think that because of karl Marx the world shifted from monarchy to democracy really???? Nd btw you have to understand that feudalism was a complex system that served societal needs at the time it existed, providing stability and organization in a decentralized manner..........and YES uske pitaji ek jews the thats why he didn't visit hes father's funeral
@@khushalanipuneet revolution under Lenin did had an impact in changing the world order just like French revolution. While French revolution occured without banner of Marxism, Russian revolution didn't. Nationalism was a force post 1900. I know feudalism and it's complexity. Indeed barter system was a need of a particular time, but society did change from barter system. What's the point with "feudalism was a need". When did I deny that? Point is we progressed away from it. Marx had its role. World was divided into first, second and third world countries in the name of Marx and how much Marxist principal they imbibed in their policy. Even first world country today provides free education and healthcare (confluence of Marxism with liberal market is socialist policy) . regarding other two group of countries, impact is much more.
@@khushalanipuneet ek "Jews" nhi hota bhai. Angrezi seekh le, padai karle. Ek "jew" hota hai. Khair, not the comprehension I was intending to focus upon.
@@himesh5869 one thing I'm completely sure about you you're from Kerala a failed communist state a typical bad mouthed wannabe cool American , 2nd Jew and Jews are commonly used to describe individuals or groups who follow Judaism
3rd the most important, english bolne se aap cool to hojaoge lekin civilized aur educated nahi
@@khushalanipuneet again guessed like an intellectual. I'm from UP, living in Gurgaon and running a tech startup. Secondly, check out how many labour go to Kerala and check out HDI indicator and you can see where other states stand infront of Kerala. Do your own research and we talk.
Thirdly, jew is singular. Jews is plural, denotes a group.
English pe toh I wasnt even pressing the point but wanted you to reiterate on the points I presented. You clearly don't have idea on world order and influence of Marx in socio economic and political scenario.
Super duper nonsense video
Are bhai most of the developed countries and democratic countries follow this theory only mix of capitalism and socialism. Communsim is the last stage of marxism and no country could even communsit countries like russia couldnt get to the third stage. Duniya mein to type ke socialism hote hai democratic socialism and marxist socialist. Democratic socialism is found in countries like usa , uk, india , marxist socialism mein to dusre stage aneke baad the countries instead of entering the third stage that is communism, gets diverted to become dictatorship.
I am no left follower but knowing you are new to youtube lemme help so that you could improve and establish yourself here.
1st thing, this video does not have a constructive criticism. Koi admi jo apne personal space me gandagi se rahta hai ussey tum kaise uske works ke merit kojudge kar sakte ho.
Gandhi ji ki autobiography padhna tab pata lagega ki vo bi bahut gande admi the, lekin unhone kitna bada kaam kiya, vaise swami Vivekananda ne bi bahut galat kam kiye hai, lekin vo phir bi mahaan hai, aise bahut se examole hai.
Koi prostitute agar sex work karti hai to iska mtlb ye nahi ki uske andar swabiman ya mahanta nahi ho sakti hai.
Tumhare andar abi rationality ki aur logical reasoning ki thodi Kami hai lekin try karte raho you will improve.
I would suggest you to please follow acharya Prashant.
💀
Bourgeois is poonjipati? Dude first learn the meaning of the term. Bourgeois is a term used for the middle class, the new class emergent in a new world order. Poonjipati capitalist hote hai bourgeois nahi. Actually came to see what your argument is but this immediately put me off and I am no Marx fan or anything.
Karl marks lazy tha matalab
Matlab kaamchor tha
Very weak arguments
🤣🤣🤣 what kinds of drugs are you taking man?? Mujhe drug do drug do 🤣? Karl Marx read books thats why he is kamchoor😂😂?? Tu vhi par liya kar😁