Case 132: Manual of PCI - PCI through 2 TAVRs

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
  • A patient with two prior TAVR procedures (31 mm CoreValve implanted 6 years prior and 29 mm Sapien 3 implanted 2 years prior) presented with chest pain and inferior ischemia. Coronary angiography was challenging: a JR4 diagnostic catheter failed to engage but engagement was achieved with a 6 French multipurpose diagnostic catheter. The culprit lesion was a 90% mid RCA lesion. Engagement with a JR4 and a multipurpose guide catheter failed. We engaged the right coronary artery with a multipurpose diagnostic catheter and inserted a workhorse wire and a 300 cm long Grand Slam guidewire. We removed the diagnostic catheter leaving the Grand Slam guidewire in place and inserted a JR4 guide catheter over the Grand Slam wire. We then inserted a 6 French guide catheter extension that improved engagement of the right coronary artery. OCT suggested that the lesion was a calcified nodule. We performed several runs of orbital atherectomy followed by successful balloon expansion and DES implantation.

Комментарии • 9

  • @shangz0216
    @shangz0216 2 года назад

    Thanks for the educative case sharing.

  • @ramidudin1
    @ramidudin1 2 года назад

    Excellent job. I think The Aorta was dilated which make engagement difficult .

  • @micger
    @micger 2 года назад

    Good case! What is the pouch seen at the ostium?

  • @ronak456
    @ronak456 2 года назад

    In final result, was there a dissection near RCA ostia???? There is some contrast hanging seen...

    • @manosbrilakis
      @manosbrilakis  2 года назад +2

      I think this is the space between the coronary sinus and the TAVR valve.

    • @ronak456
      @ronak456 2 года назад

      @@manosbrilakis Yes sir... Agreed... Searched for this one on google scholar..

  • @farukakturk5388
    @farukakturk5388 2 года назад

    If there is not a supportive wire in the lab would you stent this via the diagnostic catheter?

    • @manosbrilakis
      @manosbrilakis  2 года назад +1

      Probably not - there is a significant risk of losing the stent

    • @farukakturk5388
      @farukakturk5388 2 года назад

      @@manosbrilakis Thank you sir