GrapheneOS review | DE-GOOGLE your Android!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 373

  • @9to5Google
    @9to5Google  7 месяцев назад +104

    For those concerned: The number some have spotted at 9:47 is a spam caller. We don't like spam - and I'm sure you hate it too :)

  • @DenisKudlik
    @DenisKudlik 7 месяцев назад +229

    oh wow, google really hasn't touched the default AOSP apps since 2016

    • @shivanshsingh979
      @shivanshsingh979 7 месяцев назад +7

      Doesn't matter, lol

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +190

      GrapheneOS will be replacing all of those apps but our priority has always been improving the privacy, security and compatibility of the base OS rather than focusing on apps when there are so many good options available. We've already replaced the Camera app since only the system camera app can provide the external media capture feature for other apps and will be replacing the others too. We recently shipped a new very modern Setup Wizard.

    • @heiebdbfn
      @heiebdbfn 7 месяцев назад +1

      I personally love it, that's such a fun nostalgic era of android

    • @heiebdbfn
      @heiebdbfn 7 месяцев назад +3

      everything looks so simple :)

    • @WildMidwest1
      @WildMidwest1 7 месяцев назад +22

      @@GrapheneOSThe setup wizard my not be needed by people who have been in this community a long time, but for users like me (switching from iOS this week and no prior Android experience) it’s undoubtedly a plus. There’s so much to learn all at once - from custom keyboards, to open cloud services, to email, to music players, to camera apps, to YT replacements Newpipe vs ReVanced, etc. The average iOs switcher is going to feel overwhelmed without some hand holding.
      I am equally excited about GrapheneOS as I am about prying Apple’s gnarly fingers off my throat. Thank you! 🎉

  • @thecastiel69
    @thecastiel69 7 месяцев назад +100

    There is a phone number visible on 9:47, which you might want to censor as this is a privacy focused video

    • @knerduno5942
      @knerduno5942 7 месяцев назад +14

      Is this was really privacy focus, the video would be posted on the likes of Rumble Odysee, or PeerTube

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +78

      ​@@knerduno5942 Posting privacy related videos across platforms makes sense.

    • @thecastiel69
      @thecastiel69 7 месяцев назад

      @@knerduno5942 People using Odysee or PeerTube know all this shit, people using platforms like RUclips or Tiktok needs this knowledge

    • @notafbihoneypot8487
      @notafbihoneypot8487 7 месяцев назад +4

      Probs a fake number bro, chill lol

    • @ExperiencersInternational
      @ExperiencersInternational 7 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@notafbihoneypot8487 I highly doubt it, wouldn't be surprised if that's an active O2 number or something

  • @cyberxspeed
    @cyberxspeed 3 месяца назад +26

    Moving over to GrapheneOS from google stock android has been the best decision I've made when it came to phones. I can't stand most google apps and services.

    • @sunilbanhal3788
      @sunilbanhal3788 10 дней назад

      how's the battery backup compared to stock rom

  • @burhanbudak6041
    @burhanbudak6041 6 месяцев назад +39

    For VPN, GOS allows the Wireguard kernel version, completly protecting the phone on thr kernel version.

    • @mokisan
      @mokisan 3 месяца назад +2

      How so you do it ?

    • @iam_muni_baa
      @iam_muni_baa 3 дня назад

      Explain or any link to reference

  • @KHROME246
    @KHROME246 7 месяцев назад +12

    You may want to revise the contacts app restricted to only importing a file.

  • @speedytruck
    @speedytruck 7 месяцев назад +25

    That was very well researched video! I've been using GrapheneOS for a very long time and probably couldn't have made a better video lol. Btw, I think the reason why GrapheneOS supports only pixels, besides relocking with user keys, is because it uses pixel's secure element (forgot what it's called) that doesn't have a comparable alternative in other phones.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +36

      We use Pixels because they're the most secure Android devices and proper uniquely first class alternate OS support. We have a list of the official security and other requirements in the future devices section of our FAQ. We'd love to support a few other devices beyond Pixels but cannot currently do that due to them not meeting our security requirements yet. Most Android devices have awful security due to not providing proper patches, which is not at all addressed by using an alternate OS still depending on the same firmware and driver patches. Similarly, most are missing a lot of firmware/hardware security features. Samsung Galaxy devices meet most of our requirements, but ruin it by crippling security if you use an alternate OS. They also void the warranty if you use another OS, unlike Pixels, which is a major issue since a lot of devices end up having hardware failures regardless of brand. It doesn't happen to most people, but even only 2/100 devices needing to be replaced would be a major issue for our community if the warranty wasn't intact.

  • @eliwinderickx
    @eliwinderickx 7 месяцев назад +17

    I really love Graphene OS. The project works really well! But you'll need to put some time in it...

    • @LukeBranson8
      @LukeBranson8 7 месяцев назад +7

      And nobody in 2024 will sacrifice an ounce of convenience unfortunately

    • @panzerfaust7672
      @panzerfaust7672 7 месяцев назад +10

      Honestly it's not even that hard, I switched from an iPhone to a 8 pro and wouldn't want to switch back. Took a bit of time to change from Gmail to Proton but thats it.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад

      People can use sandboxed Google Play in the main user account to start, and they'll still be getting the privacy and security benefits of GrapheneOS. Moving to a different app ecosystem, moving sandboxed Google Play to a secondary profile or avoiding it entirely is not at all required to get the privacy and security benefits of GrapheneOS. In fact, for someone using a whole bunch of mainstream apps and services, they're benefiting even more from privacy features like Storage Scopes, Contact Scopes, Sensors toggle and many other features.

    • @LiamOLuachra
      @LiamOLuachra 6 месяцев назад +4

      I spend less time troubleshooting Graphene than stock. Stock Android has to much crap to slow down the system. Graphene is clean and quiet.

  • @Jindraxx20
    @Jindraxx20 7 месяцев назад +19

    Hey there !!! Thank you for the content that you provided us !
    I have 1 question that is often regarding GrapheneOS.
    How do you handle banking apps since they are part of play store ??!

    • @Sithhy
      @Sithhy 7 месяцев назад +8

      Aurora Store I guess

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +33

      One of the features provided by GrapheneOS is the option to use sandboxed Google Play. The vast majority of apps on the Play Store are compatible. Banking apps are a special case where certain banks forbid using an alternate OS by checking for a Google certified OS on the device, but most banking apps do work.

    • @Jindraxx20
      @Jindraxx20 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@GrapheneOS Thank you very much for the reply to my question !!

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +19

      @@Jindraxx20 Unfortunately a lot of our replies to other questions and comments are being filtered out. It seems their spam filtering dislikes us linking to the appropriate sections in our FAQ, features page, etc. We tried to participate here a lot more than it seems but it largely got filtered out by RUclips.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 6 месяцев назад

      @@LiamOLuachra The standard permissions toggles don't need to be enabled for sandboxed Google Play. It functions fine without granting that access. Granting sandboxed Play Store the ability to install apps only gives it the ability to request to install apps.
      It's a misconception that these are the only permissions it has on the stock OS. Privileged permissions give far more access than the standard permissions and are not shown in the UI. On the stock OS, it's a core component of the OS with dozens of privileged permissions, special SELinux policy instead of running in the standard app sandbox, a bunch of whitelisted access and it's also used as the backend for the OS for various things. Privileged permissions are what give it the ability to install, update and remove apps without user consent on the stock OS which is the tip of the iceberg for what's permitted.
      The whole point of our sandboxed Google Play feature is that they run as regular sandboxed apps with zero access beyond the standard access. Our usage guide covers this feature, but we can't post links on RUclips without comments being filtered.

  • @tiagoreis5390
    @tiagoreis5390 6 месяцев назад +15

    Another apps recomendation i use with graphene OS:
    Magic Earth
    QUIK (sms)
    Signal
    Simplex
    Syncthing
    Ultrasonic
    Obtainium
    RHVoice
    Musekit
    CalyxVPN
    Binary eye
    LBRY
    Disroot App
    Futo Voice input
    Nunti
    Geddit
    Etar (calendar)
    Kontalk
    Local monero
    Privacyblur
    Fake contacts
    Fake traveler
    and this is just a few :)

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад +2

      I love that list, saw a few new ones on there.

    • @vlad165
      @vlad165 6 месяцев назад

      I would certainly exclude Signal

    • @tiagoreis5390
      @tiagoreis5390 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@vlad165 why?

    • @Nittigrader
      @Nittigrader 14 часов назад

      @@vlad165yes why? 😂

  • @mmmiguelestrada
    @mmmiguelestrada 25 дней назад +1

    I’m considering going from an iPhone to a Pixel with Graphene. I am want privacy, but also a way to block porn websites. Apple has parental controls, but that’s easy to override. Does Graphene offer website blocking?

  • @idcrafter-cgi
    @idcrafter-cgi 7 месяцев назад +14

    A CalyxOS review would also be great due to it making use of microG that makes Google services work via foss software which is microG.

    • @starkle
      @starkle 6 месяцев назад +8

      Well microG isn't really close to as good as GrapheneOS's Sandboxed Google Play.
      - On CalyxOS it runs with special system privileges, instead of the normal untrusted app sandbox.
      - It downloads and executes proprietary Google code for SafetyNet anyway.
      - It fundamentally serves apps that are running proprietary Google libraries anyway.
      - It requires signature spoofing, which is a massive security risk (although CalyxOS restricts this to just microG spoofing the play services).
      - Compatibility will always be spottier than just using the actual Play Services.

  • @jeisson42
    @jeisson42 5 месяцев назад +3

    I tried it before and it was a pain. The gps never worked properly, location was always like a hundred meters away.
    A dictionary app didn´t read the words because something that comes with the google pack apps were missing. Eventually I came back to the stock android version.

    • @gullible119
      @gullible119 4 месяца назад +5

      When did u try it? Nothing what u are complaining about have happened to me.

    • @jeisson42
      @jeisson42 4 месяца назад

      @@gullible119 2022 with a pixel 6 pro. It didn't last long because I need the gps very often and for that I had to use a different phone because the location was always very inaccurate on the pixel.
      I tried many different apps, even google maps on the browser, it never worked properly, I also searched help in the telegram community and no one knew the reason.
      Once I went back to Android everything was normal, so it was not the phone

    • @BoimlerBrad
      @BoimlerBrad 2 месяца назад +5

      Yeah running rock solid for over a year none of these issues actually more stable than Google's Android.

  • @tobi1751
    @tobi1751 7 месяцев назад +11

    Hey, is there a way to backup the stock OS data and then import it to Graphene OS/CalyxOS?
    Been thinking about changing the Rom on my Pixel 7a for a while now.
    Would look forward to an answer 🙂

    • @OfficialChaumin
      @OfficialChaumin 7 месяцев назад +10

      There is a method for transferring from one Graphene device to another Graphene device. As far as stock to Graphene goes, or vice versa, it's best to manually backup your files to a cloud service or external drive. Also make a list of installed apps or take a screenshot and then manually install them after switching the OS. That's the route I took. Time consuming, but worth it in the end.

    • @vio_official__
      @vio_official__ 7 месяцев назад +4

      Titanium Backup is the closest you can get

    • @yodasgodfather1957
      @yodasgodfather1957 7 месяцев назад +2

      Maybe swift backup?

    • @WildMidwest1
      @WildMidwest1 7 месяцев назад

      ⁠@@vio_official__I read that Titanium Backup has been EOL a few years and compatibility has not kept up since Android 4. Is that wrong? Swift Backup reportedly encrypts via a Google account, with all the pros/cons that implies. (This info was per a 2021 Reddit thread, so correct anything that’s outdated or wrong.)
      Has anybody used Migrate?

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +11

      You can manually back up and restore your home directory, contacts and apps supporting their own backups. You need to be on GrapheneOS to do a proper backup and restore to GrapheneOS.
      GrapheneOS and CalyxOS are very different. GrapheneOS is a hardened OS with substantial privacy/security improvements.
      CalyxOS is not a hardened OS. It greatly reduces security vs. AOSP via added attack surface, rolled back security and slow patches.
      Compatibility with Android apps is also much different. GrapheneOS provides our sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer.
      Can run the vast majority of Play Store apps on GrapheneOS, but not CalyxOS with the much more limited microG approach.

  • @any4003
    @any4003 6 месяцев назад +7

    Great review it seem OS systems like these need more support and more fine tuning etc. There js a LOT they could do to improve this OS qnd still remain private.

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад +5

      What would you propose they do? It supports mostly everything out of the box.
      Being Android you can just install another launcher to make it look how you want. The only feature missing is Google's Tap to Pay. You don't have to use their native apps, you can install Sandboxed Google Play Services & use the regular GCam, GBoard, Google Messages, Google Maps, etc. It'll still be more private as well. I personally use GCam with network permissions disabled so I can benifit from the phones hardware while also staying private.
      I hope this comment provides more context around the lack of limitations for GrapheneOS, most people think its "locked down" in some way but that isn't really the case. You can use all the services you love while still benefiting from the enhancements GrapheneOS provides.

    • @gullible119
      @gullible119 4 месяца назад +4

      U mention literally nothing that could help them improve the os, very strange. Phone support is justified because of Google’s Titan SEC chip.

  • @Nimrod77
    @Nimrod77 7 месяцев назад +5

    I have a Samsung device but would love the security and privacy features of Graphine. Is there an alternative for Samsung?

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад

      You could get DNS ad blocking to try & fix some of the problems, but Samsung devices suck for privacy & have sub-par security for Android's standards. Though I do believe Samsung devices are nicer & also smaller as well. Google Pixels' are too big, luckily it looks like the Pixel 9 will be slightly smaller, every little bit helps.

    • @ighorhenrique9593
      @ighorhenrique9593 3 месяца назад

      Hey friend. Do you have any sources so I can read about Samsung phones having worse privacy and being less secure?​@@Zaptosis

    • @Nomadmandude
      @Nomadmandude 3 месяца назад

      DNSSEC.

  • @incrediblez394
    @incrediblez394 2 месяца назад +1

    Does anyone here have any issues with 5g signals being too low on Graphene. I use sim card on another phone and i get good 5G signal but when swapping out and using it on graphene it doesn't matter where i go its either 1 bar or no signal. Might have to re install but not sure.

  • @dudi2200
    @dudi2200 6 месяцев назад +9

    Is there any analysis available of the os code? Has anyone checked the source code to see that there are no suspicious things? How can i make sure the web installer install the same source code and not something else? How can i take the code and install the os myself without the installer? I know i sound paranoid but i just wanna make sure it's safe

    • @lukejay
      @lukejay 6 месяцев назад +1

      Good points. I had the same thoughts.

  • @brandonhamaguchi
    @brandonhamaguchi 7 месяцев назад +19

    How do they sustain the project?

    • @Makes_me_wonder
      @Makes_me_wonder 6 месяцев назад +19

      It's a hobby project. They will develop the OS as long as they enjoy doing that. And because it has an open source copyleft license, it's not really feasible to develop it in exchange for money.
      And what if a normal person who doesn't have tech skills becomes reliant on the OS and then, the hobbyist loses interest in developing it? Don't expect the foss community to answer that question. They don't have an answer.

    • @JohnDoe-qj7uq
      @JohnDoe-qj7uq 6 месяцев назад +17

      @@Makes_me_wonder The lead developer receives roughly 60k in donations a year

    • @JohnDoe-qj7uq
      @JohnDoe-qj7uq 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@Makes_me_wonder Also it is under a permissive license

    • @gelatinousribbon
      @gelatinousribbon 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@Makes_me_wonder GrapheneOS developers are hired, working for the GrapheneOS Foundation, with full pay. There are some contributions from outside but in practice most development work is done by employed developers.

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад +9

      Donations & grants to the Graphene Foundation. Also developers contributing to the project for free.

  • @Liqweed1337
    @Liqweed1337 14 дней назад

    60fps video recording is not available on graphene os. Idk why but it sucks

  • @aires69uk
    @aires69uk 2 месяца назад +1

    Can you use banking apps with GrapheneOS? I'm with Santander and it won't run on LineageOS.

    • @gazehound
      @gazehound 2 месяца назад +1

      Yes, using the google play services sandboxing most banking apps should work

  • @Jaymac0929
    @Jaymac0929 7 месяцев назад +8

    GrapheneOs is Amazing 🔥

  • @TechthroughToni
    @TechthroughToni 7 месяцев назад +7

    Try iodeOS & e-OS

    • @9to5Google
      @9to5Google  7 месяцев назад +3

      Thanks for the suggestion!

    • @WildMidwest1
      @WildMidwest1 7 месяцев назад

      @@9to5GoogleiodeOS reportedly has parental controls as a core feature. This specific focus may appeal to parents who otherwise cannot see the point of installing custom ROMs.
      Disclaimer: my knowledge about iodeOS is almost zero, as I no longer have young children. I am just thinking as someone who faced children’s privacy dilemmas not too many years ago.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +1

      These are much different than GrapheneOS and don't provide comparable privacy or security. They greatly reduce security rather than improving it. They use different third party services instead of Google services with their own privacy issues. They don't provide similar privacy or security features to GrapheneOS. microG also doesn't provide comparable app compatibility to sandboxed Google Play and we avoided that approach because it doesn't meet our privacy/security requirements.

  • @defranken
    @defranken Месяц назад +1

    I've used Graphene for years and never going back

  • @ulas-2023
    @ulas-2023 6 месяцев назад +3

    If you install it on a pixel phone, will you still be able to use its camera and a.i. features?

    • @wombatpandaa9774
      @wombatpandaa9774 6 месяцев назад +3

      In short, no. Pixel phones have okay camera hardware and spectacular camera software, which is not bundled into Android by default. If you got a good alternative camera app it's possible some features may be available, but they definitely won't be in the default GrapheneOS experience. Same with AI - that's software, not hardware, so it won't be in GrapheneOS unless you somehow find a way to make it work.

    • @ulas-2023
      @ulas-2023 6 месяцев назад

      @@wombatpandaa9774 its ashame, so its not really useful to buy a new model Pixel 8 or 9 soon, if you want to use GrapheneOS, since you can not use a lot of the software features which is why Pixel 9 will be so expensive I guess. So it only makes sense to use GrapheneOS with an older cheaper Pixel, as I dont see any benefits in buying an expensive Pixel while not using its features execpt paying for it.

    • @starkle
      @starkle 6 месяцев назад +2

      The Pixel camera 100% works in GrapheneOS. I'm not familiar with their other AI features but they should work too. You just need to install them; they don't come preinstalled.

    • @vaultboy1419
      @vaultboy1419 2 месяца назад

      @@wombatpandaa9774 GCam ports brother. Most AI is just an app, and most of them can be installed even on Graphene.

  • @kierenkd
    @kierenkd 7 месяцев назад +2

    Samsung apps help me de-google quite a bit but Im yet to find a decent alternative to google maps or google waze. It would be good if Microsoft / Garmin / OS would step up. I dont rate OsmAnd

    • @fort6564
      @fort6564 7 месяцев назад

      Yeah ive been using GOS for about 6 months and that is one google app I cannot live without, especially since I have been travelling a lot the past couple of months.

    • @AyukaAmameth
      @AyukaAmameth 7 месяцев назад +2

      True theres no good alternative for maps or waze

    • @एड्वर्डकॅस्ट्रो
      @एड्वर्डकॅस्ट्रो 7 месяцев назад +1

      The closest would be HERE WeGo, but it's still missing a lot.

    • @WildMidwest1
      @WildMidwest1 7 месяцев назад +2

      I cannot think of two companies LESS likely to produce something decent or privacy focused than Garmin or MS.
      For all its flaws, Apple Maps is easiest on my eyes when I am driving in traffic. Waze is second best but it still has too much distracting clutter.
      Google Maps is great when I am stationary with my reading glasses on, say parked at a rest stop, but not in heavy traffic.

    • @Mexicomank2
      @Mexicomank2 3 месяца назад

      Organic maps might work for you but tbh google maps is currently best option unless apple bring apple maps to android as they actually are better with privacy when it comes to map apps so I hope one day they bring the competition

  • @CrashUK28
    @CrashUK28 2 месяца назад

    whats the battery life like. androld eats battery when your not doing any thing.

  • @EyesOfByes
    @EyesOfByes 7 месяцев назад +9

    Graphene OS on the Snapdragon X Elite would be something you reviewers could test. I guess you'd need an external touchscreen for that ;)

    • @papakeks
      @papakeks 7 месяцев назад +8

      How can GrapheneOS be tested on a Snapdragon Elite device when the only supported smartphone with Snapdragon SoC is the Google Pixel 5a?

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +6

      Please see the future devices section in our FAQ where you can see a list of requirements. RUclips unfortunately won't allow us to link our features page or FAQ without it removing the comments as potential spam, but you can quickly get there with a search.

    • @netnomad47
      @netnomad47 6 месяцев назад

      Graphene os is android based not Windows based lol. Snapdragon X elite is for Windows.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 6 месяцев назад +2

      @@netnomad47 It's not specifically for Windows but the devices using it will mostly be Windows devices and won't meet our requirements.

  • @anthonycampos7417
    @anthonycampos7417 3 месяца назад

    Wait does it work just across all android phones or just specific models?
    Because I was debating on getting a Unihertz Tank 3 and flashing a new rom because unsecured phone directly from China.
    And I was wondering if this would work for it in particular without losing any of its features?

    • @Mexicomank2
      @Mexicomank2 3 месяца назад +3

      Pixel phones only currently are officially supported . They state there are phone requirements reasons why . The website does a better job explaining then me but its pixels officially only is the short of it

    • @anthonycampos7417
      @anthonycampos7417 3 месяца назад

      @@Mexicomank2 ahhh ok. Ty

  • @MicrochipMD
    @MicrochipMD Месяц назад

    Can this build be tracked when phone is “off”?

  • @People_Scare_Me
    @People_Scare_Me 2 месяца назад

    I would like full privacy but this seems like such a hassel just to live how I already am just with my phone being slightly more annoying to use I'm just turning off personalised ads and any privacy settings that I can

    • @Nittigrader
      @Nittigrader 14 часов назад

      Doing that does not help as they still create extensive folders on your behavioral data based on "everything" they track that you do on your phone.

  • @berryxd8293
    @berryxd8293 7 месяцев назад +3

    Whats the phone being used in the video?

    • @DanteRatto
      @DanteRatto 7 месяцев назад +2

      I think it's a Pixel 7

    • @berryxd8293
      @berryxd8293 7 месяцев назад +2

      Thanks. I thought so too, but wanted to make sure.

    • @berryxd8293
      @berryxd8293 7 месяцев назад +2

      Hold on. Isn't it the 7a?? The bezels

    • @DanteRatto
      @DanteRatto 7 месяцев назад

      @@berryxd8293 Yeah, that makes sense.

    • @cavon_08
      @cavon_08 7 месяцев назад +3

      It's the 7a. You can tell by the antenna lines at the top. The Pixel 7 has one and the 7a has two

  • @brandonhamaguchi
    @brandonhamaguchi 7 месяцев назад +1

    But the limitations on payment apps can be avoided just using the browser and websites of those different services right? Or also the web versions don't work?

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад

      Google Pay actually works just fine, you can make in app purchases & all that. The only part which doesn't work is Google's Tap to Pay through Google Wallet.
      However you can still use NFC if your bank's app has touchless payment functionality built in. You can also just put your credit card behind your phone case or get a credit card case (not a bulky wallet case) & tap your phone like that.
      But payments on the device work just fine.

    • @BoimlerBrad
      @BoimlerBrad 5 месяцев назад +1

      So Google Pay on sites and in apps still work if you want tap to pay get a pixel watch it will still allow NFC payments.

    • @francoislachance7901
      @francoislachance7901 4 месяца назад +2

      I mean, if you are truly worried about privacy and security then you should make cash payments instead of using Google Pay.

  • @JoeDirt-qw7kk
    @JoeDirt-qw7kk 5 месяцев назад

    Does Graphene do beta 15 too? I'm running 15 on my 7 pro, which is why I ask.
    Also, I just ordered a new screen with the finger sensor, which means I have to get off beta most likely, which means deleting it to recalibrate it. If I break my screen again, is Graphene capable of calibrating the finger sensor?

    • @1albumamonth
      @1albumamonth 4 месяца назад +1

      GrapheneOS does not release beta updates to upcoming OS versions, so currently on 14. As for the calibration question, I would imagine the pixel calibration tool *should* work, but it's a good question.

  • @cryptohog2303
    @cryptohog2303 3 месяца назад

    is it worth to install graphene on Google pixel 9 pro, or we would lose so much from it's AI features and image capabilities?

    • @TTKChristo
      @TTKChristo 2 месяца назад +7

      Yes, install it right away so you don't even have time to get used to the shitty invasive features in the stock OS.

  • @id104335409
    @id104335409 2 месяца назад +4

    Please start with the fact it only works on Google Pixel phones!

  • @sandrogvenetadze4511
    @sandrogvenetadze4511 6 месяцев назад +1

    Can i reset the device after i installed grapheneos ? Like to the normal android/google services

    • @Haunting_Shadow
      @Haunting_Shadow 5 месяцев назад

      If you mean that you want to go back to the Stock opersting system, yes you can go back lol

  • @Jozuentor
    @Jozuentor 7 месяцев назад +1

    I like this OS but I can never get location to work reliably it's important for me I have accurate location because I use it to clock in and out of work from a app 💯

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +1

      This is a configuration choice you're making, and you can have it work the same as it does on the stock OS if you choose. GrapheneOS provides the same satellite-based location detection as the stock OS with identical results compared to the stock OS with network-based location enabled. It sounds like you're trying to get location indoors where you don't have satellite reception. You can have that on GrapheneOS by setting up network-based location detection. We tried linking you to our guide on this, but RUclips removes it as spam. If you use sandboxed Google Play, you can use their network location service. You can disable location request rerouting in Settings > Apps > Sandboxed Google Play to stop redirecting apps requesting location from the OS to requesting it from sandboxed Google Play along with granting Nearby Devices and always allowed Location access to sandboxed Play services and enabling their network location toggle. That will provide the same network location functionality as the stock OS, it's just very explicitly opt-in instead of opt-out. You can also enable the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth scanning toggles which are normally enabled by default in the stock OS to have it able to scan for those when they're otherwise disabled as long as it has the Nearby Devices and Location permissions.

    • @starkle
      @starkle 6 месяцев назад

      This can be done. Just install Google Play Services, then disable the location request redirect in the Sandboxed Google Play settings. It's disabled by default because it basically tells Google where you are at all times, but it's how other phones get such quick and precise location.

  • @beickus
    @beickus 4 месяца назад

    i have a question - i can install graphene in an old phone (A5 '16) - what if i don't like it, can i put android back?

    • @linuxramblingproductions8554
      @linuxramblingproductions8554 3 месяца назад

      Its pixel only because its the only one with long enough hardware support and good enough security

  • @DARKKNIGHT-no4fz
    @DARKKNIGHT-no4fz 3 месяца назад +1

    I just realised the subscribe button light up when he mention it

  • @nigelnyakudya2262
    @nigelnyakudya2262 3 месяца назад

    Will i be able to use root or apps that require root access?

  • @MQZ17
    @MQZ17 7 месяцев назад +4

    Not for me, but it's cool that there are alternatives on android

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад

      GrapheneOS has support for sandboxed Google Play so it's possible to use it with the Play Store and a bunch of mainstream apps. Sandboxed Google Play doesn't have any special access beyond a regular app. The major app privacy features it offers such as Contact Scopes, Storage Scopes, Sensors toggle, etc. are most valuable for people who use a bunch of mainstream apps. It's not only for a niche audience. It's simply an option to use it without mainstream apps.

  • @yagoa
    @yagoa 6 месяцев назад

    a couple of abbreviations could have been skipped and it would have been intelligible to all techy people

  • @raid3n1117
    @raid3n1117 7 месяцев назад +3

    Does GrapheneOS improve battery performance?

    • @lovro_ribic
      @lovro_ribic 6 месяцев назад +1

      Its possible because there are less things running but it depends on how well optimized the os is.

    • @netnomad47
      @netnomad47 6 месяцев назад +2

      Yes it does

    • @mydevices768
      @mydevices768 6 месяцев назад

      Yesss!

    • @lassebodilsen
      @lassebodilsen 3 месяца назад +1

      Late answer.
      I have found that onscreen usage is about the same, but standby time is greatly improved.

  • @imeverywhereandnowhere56
    @imeverywhereandnowhere56 15 дней назад

    What if you can't get access to the bootloader?

    • @mungox1
      @mungox1 2 дня назад

      You must use a Pixel

  • @BulbaReider77
    @BulbaReider77 7 месяцев назад +3

    For me, Graphene OS is good at everything except customization, it's really not enough, especially changing the design of the clock on the lock screen, and so it's a great firmware.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +8

      GrapheneOS provides essentially the same customization as the stock Pixel OS, with a whole bunch of additional privacy and security features. Lock screen clock customization is planned but they didn't include the stock Pixel OS clocks in AOSP.

    • @BulbaReider77
      @BulbaReider77 7 месяцев назад

      @@GrapheneOS okay, thanks for the answer, I hope in the future there will really be customization of the lock screen.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +6

      @@BulbaReider77 You can set lock screen shortcuts and similar features already. The infrastructure for configuring lock screen clocks is included but there are no alternate clocks to choose included so it's not available. Taking the ones from the stock Pixel OS would be possible but we currently aren't doing that.

    • @m.2383
      @m.2383 7 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@GrapheneOSit would be nice if that was available. Specifically that vertical text on the left clock was visually really nice (especially if using Chinese or Japanese as the display language)

  • @bes12000
    @bes12000 3 месяца назад

    Aww, I have a Samsung Galaxy, this OS looks good too bad I can't use it on it.

  • @victortoweet
    @victortoweet 7 месяцев назад +1

    What are your thoughts on Pixel experience and Project Elixir custom roms?

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +11

      The purpose of GrapheneOS is providing substantial privacy and security enhancements combined with broad app compatibility and high usability without sacrificing those. It's much different than non-hardened operating systems which roll back security rather than improving it.

    • @LiamOLuachra
      @LiamOLuachra 6 месяцев назад

      Pixel experience isn't a thing as of a few days ago

  • @jscreationscircus
    @jscreationscircus Месяц назад

    What is a comparable version for IPhone

    • @malamutekid8871
      @malamutekid8871 18 дней назад

      you cant use custom operating systems on apple phone as far as i know

    • @bl4z3pupz
      @bl4z3pupz 18 дней назад

      Buying an android phone

  • @bharath2508
    @bharath2508 6 месяцев назад

    I can't use this version of android.

  • @eduardolopes7338
    @eduardolopes7338 7 месяцев назад +2

    always good to know it.

  • @YxngBillyBob
    @YxngBillyBob 2 месяца назад

    Can i use tap snd go and bsnking apps on pxl 8 xl

    • @tsunamijune
      @tsunamijune 2 месяца назад

      Tap no, Banking apps are a mixed bag, but technically yes.

  • @raxcentalruthenta1456
    @raxcentalruthenta1456 4 месяца назад +2

    The limited device support scope will never make these a viable solution. Until they can expand the amount of devices they support, then it's not even worth looking at.

    • @g1y3
      @g1y3 4 месяца назад +1

      It's costly & time consuming to port to any device.

    • @meroinheroin
      @meroinheroin 4 месяца назад +1

      ​​@@g1y3 Yeah, there's third party ports to other devices. But they can't guarantee stability across multiple devices. Some play store apps only support pixels or flagship Samsung's because of fragmentation. It's easier to optimize for one or two models.

    • @cptbaker
      @cptbaker 4 месяца назад +3

      But this project isn't geared toward the general public, it's geared towards individuals that are looking for other means outside of Android and iOS, that are more privacy oriented. I'd also argue quite the opposite, as the more people switch to these os's, the more support they gain, the more people sign on to contribute to the open source project.
      At the end of the day, it comes down to how much your privacy is worth to you. Would you prefer to sacrifice your privacy and allow iOS or Android to collect as much telemetry as they want?
      If any user doesn't feel that the switch is worth it for them, then privacy isn't worth as much to them, as somebody who prefers privacy over everything, who wouldn't mind troubleshooting issues that come with installing the OS, if it meant a major corporation could no longer collect telemetry from you.
      That doesn't mean that the privacy from one individual is more valuable than the other, it just means they have their priorities in different orders. 🤷 Either way, I think as many people as possible should check it out and just learn something new, especially if it means taking power away from major tech corporations.

    • @BoimlerBrad
      @BoimlerBrad 2 месяца назад

      Its because only Google Pixel Phones meet the hardware security requirements complain to the company's actully making the devices

  • @dekdoi4207
    @dekdoi4207 6 месяцев назад +2

    De google on google phone what??!

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад +1

      ik crazy, but Google lets you relock the bootloader & has the best hardware security so their the only choice.

  • @HiddenPalm
    @HiddenPalm 7 месяцев назад +2

    This is really only for Pixel phone users.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +9

      GrapheneOS only supports Pixel devices because they're the most secure Android devices. Other Android devices are mostly extremely lacking in security and the few options with decent security don't provide proper alternate OS support. Our FAQ page has a section on future devices with a list of our official requirements, but RUclips won't allow us to link it here. Please check that out.

  • @parthsethia4223
    @parthsethia4223 7 месяцев назад +4

    Only works on pixel

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +9

      GrapheneOS only supports Pixel devices because they're the most secure Android devices. Other Android devices are mostly extremely lacking in security and the few options with decent security don't provide proper alternate OS support. Our FAQ page has a section on future devices with a list of our official requirements, but RUclips won't allow us to link it here. Please check that out.

  • @DeanteMason
    @DeanteMason 2 месяца назад +1

    Don't !! They just released an update that caused my phone to stop woeking.; I can't even make phone calls, text, or listen to RUclips. In going back to Google!!

  • @maverick7wi
    @maverick7wi 6 месяцев назад

    Anyone have input on Android Auto and how it works on Graphene? (If it does at all)

    • @xi6ei
      @xi6ei 6 месяцев назад

      Yes, Android Auto works on GrapheneOS, support for it was introduced recently as a matter of fact. You can read more about it under the features section on their website.

    • @chestnut.mp4656
      @chestnut.mp4656 6 месяцев назад

      Not currently available but the developers are working on it last I checked

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад

      @@chestnut.mp4656 They added it a while back but I've not tested it. Maybe I'll do a video trying it out.

    • @starkle
      @starkle 6 месяцев назад +1

      Android Auto totally works now, you just have to opt in to some sensitive permissions. Still less than on stock.

  • @zodSALFOO
    @zodSALFOO 7 месяцев назад

    Pixel Experience Rom Is End 🥺

  • @johncuvox
    @johncuvox 6 месяцев назад

    Which system is better to use in Russia to ensure security and privacy from the current regime terror: Android OS or GrapheneOS? Handsome, please tell me and advise! Thanks a lot in advance.

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад +2

      GrapheneOS is Android with security & privacy enhancements. So the answer would be GrapheneOS.

    • @johncuvox
      @johncuvox 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@Zaptosis Thank you very much, friend, for your advice and guidance.

    • @johncuvox
      @johncuvox 6 месяцев назад

      @@Zaptosis Tell me please. And if you compare iOS or GrapheneOS?

  • @Accountinutile-ub9fj
    @Accountinutile-ub9fj Месяц назад

    To install a de-Googled phone, I have to pay Google 900 € for a Google Pixel phone.
    I don't simply want to sponsor these people with 900€ to have my freedom, risking a hardware with a procedure I never tried before, suggest another method installable anywhere

  • @sahitkarale
    @sahitkarale 7 месяцев назад

    What about google feature drop updates ?

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +12

      Those are the quarterly Android updates which are fully provided by GrapheneOS. It always uses the latest Android release. It moved to Android 14 within days of release in October 2023, moved to Android 14 QPR1 within days of release in December and Android 14 QPR2 within days of release in March. Most of the feature drop updates are really part of apps like Pixel Camera which can largely be used on GrapheneOS.

    • @m.2383
      @m.2383 7 месяцев назад +2

      Note that you do miss some Google Pixel features. The music recognition for example. Also Assistant vice typing in gboard. Except for Google camera, which does work just as on Google's version of Android, the rest of the OS feels like a non-Pixel Android phone.

  • @CosmosProvider
    @CosmosProvider 3 месяца назад

    The video should be titled "De-Google your Pixel phone!"

  • @briangriffin5529
    @briangriffin5529 6 месяцев назад

    Is there any alternative like this ROM for Samsung s23?

  • @NeedChocyMilk
    @NeedChocyMilk 5 месяцев назад +5

    This is why pixel is king

    • @DanSmith-qg7ou
      @DanSmith-qg7ou 2 месяца назад

      How is Pixel king when it’s the flagship spying phone of google?

    • @NeedChocyMilk
      @NeedChocyMilk 2 месяца назад

      It's super tweakable compared to most phones​@@DanSmith-qg7ou

  • @DanielMargineanPutiii
    @DanielMargineanPutiii 7 месяцев назад +1

    Hei, i installed on my pixel and i have problem with the battery

    • @FlintYeastwood
      @FlintYeastwood 7 месяцев назад

      Of course. Your phone was not built to run a 3rd party OS. It was built to run the OS of the company that designed it. 99.9 percent of smartphones are made and optimized to run either Android or iOS.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +8

      @@FlintYeastwood The devices we support run the OS perfectly and are optimized to do it. They have first class alternate OS support.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад

      This is caused by your choice of apps and services. It's likely you're using an app like Signal with their own inefficient push notification implementation instead of Firebase Cloud Messaging. Use the Signal fork Molly instead of Signal itself for much better battery life. It's fully compatible with it.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +9

      This is caused by the apps you've installed. For example, Signal drains a lot of battery with their own push implementation if you installed it without having sandboxed Google Play installed before it. For Signal, you can use the Molly fork of Signal instead of Signal itself. Molly is much more battery efficient when not using Google Play's Firebase Cloud Messaging. The same thing applies to some other apps.
      GrapheneOS starts out with much better battery life than the stock Pixel OS. It's still slightly better with sandboxed Google Play installed in a single profile. It depends on your app setup. It's easy to make it much worse than the stock OS if you install sandboxed Google Play in multiple profiles you keep active at the same time or use apps with inefficient non-Google-based push such as Signal in a profile without sandboxed Google Play.

    • @mydevices768
      @mydevices768 6 месяцев назад

      @@FlintYeastwood That's incorrect

  • @JavedKhanJDK
    @JavedKhanJDK 6 месяцев назад +1

    What's the point for even considering this os if it doesn't even work on other phones. I was hoping to get it installed on my Redmi note 10 pro which has reached its EOL but is still a very capable device for everyday tasks even today. What's the next best alternative you could recommend please?

    • @paulw7404
      @paulw7404 5 месяцев назад +1

      If EOL - Just purchase a pixel, one generation behind the latest version at a discounted price - WHAT I DID. MOST major phone manufactures PREVENT rooting of phones as they cannot mine your data and on sell it. Remember YOU are the product - not your phone. Stay away from Samsung, ASUS, etc. (If you are watching this you are definitely not an Apple minion 😀) See my other comment about my experience with GOS.

    • @JavedKhanJDK
      @JavedKhanJDK 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@paulw7404 if only it were that easy. Since 2019, our telecom regulator has slapped us with exorbitant taxes on phones that are imported from outside there country and even those coming from abroad have only 120 days to register and pay those taxes before the phones are completely blocked from utilizing the cellular networks in the country. I had been eyeing the pixel A series and nothing A series for a while, but thanks to the outrageous taxes they're prices 3-4 times more than what they're available at these days.

  • @aaronallen2774
    @aaronallen2774 4 месяца назад

    Doesn’t support 8a :(

  • @drawalex
    @drawalex 4 месяца назад +1

    Does it pass the strong integrity test?

    • @gamechannel1271
      @gamechannel1271 Месяц назад

      No. You'd need to root.

    • @drawalex
      @drawalex 25 дней назад

      @@gamechannel1271 Is it because it is not certified? Because the bootloader can be blocked.

  • @5koKirilov
    @5koKirilov 7 месяцев назад +2

    Damian, how tall are you?

  • @Elmojomo
    @Elmojomo 3 месяца назад

    "Doesn't work on Samsung phones".
    You mean, the most popular Android phones in the world? Skip.

  • @afrokorean
    @afrokorean 6 месяцев назад +1

    Are you able to us Google Wallet with this ROM?.

    • @kevinw8513
      @kevinw8513 5 месяцев назад

      Lol no. That would defeat the purpose of using Graphene. Just use any Android then

    • @FoxNewsLiveHDUltrahdfox
      @FoxNewsLiveHDUltrahdfox 4 месяца назад

      No google wallet no banks apps

    • @BoimlerBrad
      @BoimlerBrad 2 месяца назад

      ​@@FoxNewsLiveHDUltrahdfoxsome bank apps won't work yes but 90% of them do.

  • @dgattenb
    @dgattenb 7 месяцев назад +1

    restricting google is ok .. how about whats app etc etc etc

    • @nietaki
      @nietaki 7 месяцев назад +2

      It's mentioned, around the 12 minute mark, the apps can be sandboxed

    • @9to5Google
      @9to5Google  7 месяцев назад +2

      WhatsApp will work fine if sideloaded - or using the Sandboxed Google Play Store. It's all catered for with GrapheneOS !

    • @dgattenb
      @dgattenb 7 месяцев назад

      the issue is that whats app sends all your chats etc off to wherever... you cant sandbox that , as it defeats the whole object @@9to5Google

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +7

      Every user installed Android app is sandboxed and GrapheneOS greatly improves the privacy and security provided by the app sandbox. That includes features like Storage Scopes instead of granting media/storage permissions, Contact Scopes instead of granting full contacts access, Sensors toggle and much more. The purpose of our sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer feature is running Google Play as regular sandboxed apps. It's not a special sandbox for Google Play but rather a compatibility layer which allows using it in the regular app sandbox used for everything else already.

  • @sahitkarale
    @sahitkarale 7 месяцев назад +1

    Does google pay work with this OS?

    • @adityachaurasia0109
      @adityachaurasia0109 7 месяцев назад

      No

    • @m.2383
      @m.2383 7 месяцев назад

      Technically yes, but you're probably asking about NFC payments specifically, not the app itself. That does not work. Google blocks it because it's not a certified OS. You can use loyalty cards etc. though. The Huawei App gallery version of "Curve" used to work for NFC Payments, but hasn't last time I checked (like, a year ago).

    • @m.2383
      @m.2383 7 месяцев назад +2

      It's really annoying, but you get used to it eventually. If you use a single card, just get a spare card and put it between your phone & your phone's case

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +9

      You can use it via a Pixel or Galaxy Watch. Google Pay unfortunately doesn't allow using a non-Google-certified OS. It would work if they allowed it to be used. Banking apps implementing tap-to-pay in Europe, etc. work unless they check for Google certification too.

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад

      Yes but tap to pay does not. Some banks offer tap to pay functionality in their native apps through so thats an alternative.

  • @JustAnotherYou2ber
    @JustAnotherYou2ber Месяц назад

    "DeGoogle your Android device"
    But you need to have Google Pixel hardware

    • @mungox1
      @mungox1 2 дня назад

      amazingly enough, the phone has great security

  • @ulas-2023
    @ulas-2023 6 месяцев назад

    Will it also be compatible with Pixel 9 ?

  • @imeverywhereandnowhere56
    @imeverywhereandnowhere56 15 дней назад

    Only for pixel phones. Pass.

  • @leonhardheiliger2605
    @leonhardheiliger2605 2 месяца назад

    Correct, degoogle your Google Pixel.

  • @EdnovStormbrewer
    @EdnovStormbrewer 5 месяцев назад +2

    Louis Rossmann's previous experience automatically debunks this video

    • @jamesjonsy
      @jamesjonsy 4 месяца назад +3

      that was just a bunch of ego crap. no need to judge the whole project because of it.

    • @robertwright8844
      @robertwright8844 3 месяца назад +5

      Daniel Micay resigned from the project over a year ago (which is good)

    • @EdnovStormbrewer
      @EdnovStormbrewer 3 месяца назад

      @@robertwright8844 That's awesome! Hopefully without him that the project continues to thrive and improves

    • @EdnovStormbrewer
      @EdnovStormbrewer 3 месяца назад

      @@robertwright8844 That's awesome! Maybe then, without that goofy guy, the project will continue to thrive on. I hope for the best of the community

  • @AviKien-i2q
    @AviKien-i2q 5 месяцев назад

    Thanks bro

  • @albert939
    @albert939 7 месяцев назад +2

    Please make a video about CalyxOS next. It's also very private friendly and easier to set up.

    • @WildMidwest1
      @WildMidwest1 7 месяцев назад +1

      Now that GrapheneOS has a setup wizard, is Calyx still any easier?

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@WildMidwest1 GrapheneOS always had a setup wizard and has had much broader app compatibility than CalyxOS since sandboxed Google Play was added in 2021. CalyxOS rolls back security a lot rather than improving it and doesn't improve privacy in the same way as GrapheneOS. You should look into it more. CalyxOS is not a hardened OS and shares much more in common with LineageOS than GrapheneOS, which makes sense since it's largely developed by LineageOS developers using LineageOS code.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +5

      GrapheneOS is much easier to install thanks to our web installer and it provides much broader app compatibility due to sandboxed Google Play. It's easier, not harder.
      GrapheneOS and CalyxOS are very different. GrapheneOS is a hardened OS with substantial privacy/security improvements.
      CalyxOS is not a hardened OS. It greatly reduces security vs. AOSP via added attack surface, rolled back security and slow patches.
      Compatibility with Android apps is also much different. GrapheneOS provides our sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer.
      Can run the vast majority of Play Store apps on GrapheneOS, but not CalyxOS with the much more limited microG approach.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@WildMidwest1 GrapheneOS has always had a setup wizard, and since January 2021 has provided a much easier install process via our web installer, where you can even install from another Android device with nothing more than the included web browser. No special software is needed, just a web browser. Since July 2021, we've also had our sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer as a replacement for the microG approach used elsewhere which didn't meet our privacy/security standards. Sandboxed Google Play provides much broader app compatibility.

  • @VicenteFlorencio
    @VicenteFlorencio Месяц назад

    astrolab

  • @darren537
    @darren537 7 месяцев назад

    Battery life

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад +1

      Better

    • @mydevices768
      @mydevices768 6 месяцев назад

      Up to 2 days battery with my light usage and system tweaks

  • @PongiPlaysGames
    @PongiPlaysGames 6 месяцев назад +1

    Honestly, with the unnecessary jab at LineageOS and the disregard of GrapheneOS dev's toxic treatment of other OSS projects such as CalyxOS, this video comes off as surface level at best and disingenuous at worst.
    I'mma stick to supporting LOS and CalyxOS for now. I'll sleep better knowing that people behind these projects aren't complete knobs.

    • @BoimlerBrad
      @BoimlerBrad 2 месяца назад +2

      That dev causing the issues is no longer with the project.

  • @geneimprov-uc9pr
    @geneimprov-uc9pr Месяц назад

    I wonder what he is saying. Maybe a dumb phone is more secure.

  • @inversebrah
    @inversebrah 3 месяца назад

    cool

  • @lee99bay
    @lee99bay 7 месяцев назад +7

    Or install custom rom without gapps 😊

    • @ThomasTheTankEngine22
      @ThomasTheTankEngine22 7 месяцев назад +4

      So... The same thing

    • @kvbk
      @kvbk 7 месяцев назад +24

      @@ThomasTheTankEngine22 No. It is completely different. Flashing rom without gapps is just the AOSP with little additions. But graphene os is completely build differently. It just dont take AOSP and add some things, devs of graphene os modifies and sometimes completly rewrites the security code. They include so many restrictions before giving the access.

    • @kvbk
      @kvbk 7 месяцев назад +4

      no

    • @erriezzanslounge1380
      @erriezzanslounge1380 7 месяцев назад

      its like lineage os with microg?​@@kvbk

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +4

      GrapheneOS is a hardened operating system providing substantially better privacy and security through adding important privacy and security features. Not having Google apps and services is a tiny part of what it provides, and the sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer is available to use those while preserving privacy in the same way as other apps and services by using the same greatly improved standard app sandbox for them.

  • @ajshapiro1269
    @ajshapiro1269 2 месяца назад

    There is no such thing as privacy on a smartphone. Don't be fooled. Google wouldn't let you install custom roms without voiding your warranty if they couldn't track you. Everything you install, any custom rom will run on Goigle hardware. 😂

  • @MrRiley-Is-Not-Amused
    @MrRiley-Is-Not-Amused 3 месяца назад

    The fact that it only supports Pixel's makes this a nothing burger for me. No desire to own a crappy Google phone. Their hardware is junk from top to bottom.

  • @sammydepresso
    @sammydepresso 6 месяцев назад +2

    I still don’t like the community that surrounds grapheneos they are toxic as hell. Especially the Devs.

    • @PongiPlaysGames
      @PongiPlaysGames 6 месяцев назад +1

      Exactly!

    • @BoimlerBrad
      @BoimlerBrad 2 месяца назад

      The dev that caused the issue left the project

  • @priyanshusharma1812
    @priyanshusharma1812 7 месяцев назад +2

    Make the title "de google your pixel", grapheneos project is just pixel circlejerk who exclusively only support pixels and wont support any other phone even if its possible.

    • @ggorg0
      @ggorg0 7 месяцев назад +4

      That's because only pixels are so easy to flash firmware to, they get almost AOSP android out of the box, and have increased hardware security

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +7

      @@ggorg0 It's based on the security features they provide combined with first class alternate OS support rather than ease of supporting them. They an alternate OS to us all the hardware security features which are the best available on any mobile devices and as a bonus don't void the standard warranty for using an alternate OS.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +5

      We use Pixels because they're the most secure Android devices and proper uniquely first class alternate OS support. We have a list of the official security and other requirements in the future devices section of our FAQ. We'd love to support a few other devices beyond Pixels but cannot currently do that due to them not meeting our security requirements yet. Most Android devices have awful security due to not providing proper patches, which is not at all addressed by using an alternate OS still depending on the same firmware and driver patches. Similarly, most are missing a lot of firmware/hardware security features. Samsung Galaxy devices meet most of our requirements, but ruin it by crippling security if you use an alternate OS. They also void the warranty if you use another OS, unlike Pixels, which is a major issue since a lot of devices end up having hardware failures regardless of brand. It doesn't happen to most people, but even only 2/100 devices needing to be replaced would be a major issue for our community if the warranty wasn't intact.

  • @karmaspcs
    @karmaspcs 6 месяцев назад +2

    Clickbait and false information. This OS only works for google phone

  • @shadowfallenable
    @shadowfallenable 20 дней назад

    Or just buy chinese phones. Most of them are google free. 😂

  • @karanjatav8437
    @karanjatav8437 6 месяцев назад

    Lets talk when it can installed in every android phone till then its garbage.

    • @mungox1
      @mungox1 Месяц назад

      the bootloader has to be unlocked first & many phones will never support that
      using privacy software can be a lifestyle change

  • @legofanlovessayori
    @legofanlovessayori 7 месяцев назад +7

    Would go with CalyxOS if i would go privacy first, Graphene just looks boring as hell to me. Especially with that fully monochrome design.

    • @user02350
      @user02350 7 месяцев назад +16

      It’s not “fully” monochromatic. You can change that.

    • @OfficialChaumin
      @OfficialChaumin 7 месяцев назад +10

      Easy enough to install third-party launchers to make things look more modern. There are plenty of FOSS launchers, although I use Nova Launcher as my primary.

    • @vio_official__
      @vio_official__ 7 месяцев назад +12

      It's just a launcher problem, you can change the look of it with third party launcher of your choice, but Graphene OS gives you better privacy down to the system kernel level, which you can't change in CalyxOS

    • @RarelyCorrect
      @RarelyCorrect 7 месяцев назад +1

      Only the few default apps have monochrome icons. I'd bet that makes up less than 10% of the average person's total app count. On top of that, you can of course change your wallpaper and customize the OS colours with material you. So I don't see how the lack of colour is an issue.

    • @Ryan-yh9ii
      @Ryan-yh9ii 7 месяцев назад +3

      If privacy is your primary concern, not sure why you'd even consider Calyx. It's a drastically inferior project on a technical level, with worse privacy/security.

  • @MH3200
    @MH3200 7 месяцев назад +2

    If i want a de-googled device I'll just buy a Huawei handset

    • @fort6564
      @fort6564 7 месяцев назад

      why?

    • @m.2383
      @m.2383 7 месяцев назад +8

      💀 I'd rather deal with Google software or even an iPhone. Huawei, while the hardware is nice, I wouldn't trust their software at all. Hell, I'd rather get a fairphone or something than trust my data to Huawei's "it's totally not android, trust me bro" android fork

    • @MH3200
      @MH3200 7 месяцев назад

      @@m.2383 but google is way worst at collecting data and re-using it in different ways, huawei on the other hand is a "de-googlized" device that totally frees you from being motorized by a company that charges you to every service

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +1

      The purpose of GrapheneOS is not specifically avoiding Google but rather providing a very high level of privacy and security. GrapheneOS makes major privacy and security improvements to the OS. One of the major features offered by GrapheneOS is the sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer to run Google Play and other Google apps in the standard app sandbox. Our substantial app sandbox and permission model improvements such as Storage Scopes, Contact Scopes, Sensors toggle and much more apply to sandboxed Google Play too. Our project is not specifically about avoiding Google.
      GrapheneOS only supports Pixel devices because they're the most secure Android devices. Other Android devices are mostly extremely lacking in security and the few options with decent security don't provide proper alternate OS support. Our FAQ page has a section on future devices with a list of our official requirements, but RUclips won't allow us to link it here. Please check that out.

    • @BruhKhokhols
      @BruhKhokhols 7 месяцев назад

      bruh... same bullshit, but even worsen

  • @mogenvonbogel7342
    @mogenvonbogel7342 6 месяцев назад

    Android looks so ugly

  • @markhunter3936
    @markhunter3936 7 месяцев назад +3

    Or buy an iphone 😂😂😂

    • @bolm-us6yb
      @bolm-us6yb 7 месяцев назад +22

      GrapheneOS undoubtably has way better privacy and a somewhat equal level of security. Maybe it's better but maybe it's worse, we will never truly know because security vulnerabilities have to be found but GrapheneOS certainly has more settings regarding security that iPhones do not have.

    • @RarelyCorrect
      @RarelyCorrect 7 месяцев назад +20

      iPhones aren't private, Apple is just good at marketing (and they have the benefit of being compared to Google, which is definitely worse).

    • @priyanshusharma1812
      @priyanshusharma1812 7 месяцев назад +11

      Lmao privacy and iphone in same sentence

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +13

      @@bolm-us6yb GrapheneOS provides better security than an iPhone particularly on the Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro with hardware memory tagging. GrapheneOS is heavily focused on both privacy and security. Security from remote attacks, security from apps and protecting data against physical attackers are all major focuses of the project.

    • @mydevices768
      @mydevices768 6 месяцев назад +1

      I dropped iOS because of their multiple privacy issues and incredibly big lack of respect and honesty with their customers.

  • @serious6647
    @serious6647 7 месяцев назад

    Why do you guys care about privacy? Not like any of you guys or drug dealers or part of a mafia

    • @RarelyCorrect
      @RarelyCorrect 7 месяцев назад

      People in the Middle East are currently being drone striked using location data from their phones. People in the US are being caught looking for illegal abortions through their text message history. People in various countries are being losing their savings to scammers who give just enough personal info to seem "official". Germany just banned various forms of political speech, including showing certain people on livestreams. So you don't need to be doing anything wrong to need privacy - it has been a basic expectation for regular people for centuries, and letting go of it is a mistake.
      Information is power, and you never know how it could be used against you. Something you do or say today could come back and bite you 30 years from now, when circumstances are different from anything you could have predicted, because digital info is very easy to keep forever.

    • @alessandrolira4035
      @alessandrolira4035 7 месяцев назад +12

      Yes let's continue to give companies an increasingly unbridled access to our information because... We aren't drug dealers, we should feel so incredibly privileged to give Google our data then to show the world that no, we do not in fact peddle hardcore methamphetamines to middle schoolers....

    • @WildMidwest1
      @WildMidwest1 7 месяцев назад +4

      People who never fully experienced liberty don’t know what they are missing. It’s harder to explain than the experience of seeing-and-hearing a field of wildflowers in a gentle breeze to someone who was born deaf and blind… no disrespect to Helen Keller.

    • @Zaptosis
      @Zaptosis 6 месяцев назад

      Cause screw the government & mega corps spying on us thats why. Information is power, the pen is stronger then the sword & I want the power to remain in the hands of the people.

  • @bigGGyou
    @bigGGyou 7 месяцев назад +1

    Is Google wallet usable?

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад

      Google Pay NFC payments have an artificial requirement for a Google certified OS. They check for this with the Play Integrity API. It would work on GrapheneOS but they don't allow it.

    • @ggorg0
      @ggorg0 7 месяцев назад

      No, it was mentioned in the video

    • @LiamOLuachra
      @LiamOLuachra 7 месяцев назад

      No google wallet however I can still use google wallet app on graphene to set up my card on my wear os watch. Also my banks built in tap and go feature works on graphene. If your bank has it's own solution, there's a chance it may work.

    • @GrapheneOS
      @GrapheneOS 7 месяцев назад +5

      The non-tap-to-pay features work, but tap-to-pay checks for a Google certified OS. You can use Google Pay's tap-to-pay via a Pixel or Galaxy Watch. Google Pay unfortunately doesn't allow using a non-Google-certified OS. It would work if they allowed it to be used. Banking apps implementing tap-to-pay in Europe, etc. work unless they check for Google certification too.

    • @deuswulf6193
      @deuswulf6193 6 месяцев назад

      @@GrapheneOS Do you know how much data Google or Samsung would collect if pairing one of those watches with Graphene OS? Would hate to defeat the point of the OS if using a wearable. Trying to plan out an upgrade path that doesn't involve Google breathing down my neck.