Big data and dangerous ideas | Daniel Hulme | TEDxUCL
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 янв 2015
- This talk was given at a local TEDx event, produced independently of the TED Conferences. This is an illumining and animated talk about how Data and Artificial Intelligence effect our every day lives. It provides a framework for anyone to understand data driven decision making process, and raises critical moral, ethical and legal questions that society needs to address to ensure that our rights are kept safe and that we safeguard our very own existence.
Daniel is the Founder and CEO of Satalia (NPComplete Ltd), a spin-out of UCL that provides a unique algorithmic technology and professional services to solve industries data-driven decision problems. He is passionate about emerging technology and regularly speaks at events with interests in Algorithms, Optimisation, Analytics, Big Data and the Future Internet. Daniel has been awarded a Masters in Computer Science with Machine Learning and Doctorate in Computational Complexity from UCL. He is the Director of UCL Business Analytics MSc, and has Senior Researcher and Lecturing positions in Computer Science and Management Science at UCL and Pearson College. He is a Visiting Fellow of the Big Innovation Centre, and has advisory and executive positions across world-wide companies in the area of Education, Analytics, Big Data, Data-driven Decision Making and Open-Innovation. He holds an international Kauffman Global Entrepreneur Scholarship and actively promotes entrepreneurship and technology innovation across the globe.
About TEDx, x = independently organized event In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)
Fascinating. Thanks so much!
If you reread various companies Terms of Use and privacy policy you can plainly see a disturbing trend.
Amazing Speech
Thanks a bunch
Big Data to build & refreshing humane mindsets.
Logical questions....:)
Hi it’s Stephen
Whether we only exist in a temporary life (as it appears we do) or whether we exist with an actual eternal consciousness somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence throughout future eternity:
Conscious entities have basic choices:
Help, Neutral, Hurt, and to whom to Help, Neutral, Hurt.
Our collective choices, plus whatever nature can do to and/or for us is the life we will exist in for as long as we exist for, with all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of all of our choices. But then nature apparently indicates that we will all die one day from something, we will forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and then be forgotten into future eternity. Life itself is just an illusion from our human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Our true destiny is to cease to exist and be forgotten. Or so it currently appears.
"The Suckiness of Life"
Life sucks and then we die and/or life does not suck and then we still die. Then we either have a life after this life, which would probably suck and/or not suck, or we won't, and all suckiness for us will end for eternity. But while we exist, (whether only a temporary existence or an actual eternal existence), if life sucks, try to make it better and then it might not suck so bad. (But then again, better for whom?) Choices, we have choices, individually and as a society of individuals. How exactly do we want to exist, individually and as a society of individuals, while we do exist? Hence, democracy should rule the day.
What is "good" for an Individual may or may not be "good" for society. And what is "good" for society may or may not be "good" for an Individual. But we have to exist somehow, someway while we do exist.
I propose the following:
"Doing what is best for universal entities as a whole, while respecting the individual, while respecting the universe that we all depend upon, with a view of sustainability of universal entities, the individual, and the universe, universal entities can live at peace with one another as we share the universe and the very living body of "God"."
But then still, it appears that the Earth will be destroyed when the Sun becomes a red giant as it switches from burning hydrogen to burning helium, then our solar system might be pulled into our galactic center's black hole, then our expanding universe with energy that cannot supposedly be created nor destroyed that would continue to get less and less dense most probably on it's way to a "big freeze" ending, and of course the forces of nature could "evolve" at any moment in time and wipe out the universe and all in it, (with or without "God"). And why exactly haven't the forces of nature "evolved" by now since: a) The conditions acting upon them are not acting upon them like they originally were; b) Billions of years have supposedly elapsed; c) In a supposedly expanding universe whereby energy that supposedly cannot be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense. And what happens to the universe and all in it probably when, not if, that day occurs?
What exactly matters into eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
"God" alone? and/or "Me" too? and/or "Some other entity or entities"?
OR
"To no eternally consciously existent entity at all"?
Answer these questions and then you might see how to best exist today, or if our existence and whatever we do and/or not do even ultimately and eternally matters at all in the first place. We might have choices but it appears nature has its own path.
Excellent...the thing about existential discussions like this is that you're never going to arrive at a definitive answer. Like, I could argue, why should we as individuals work towards sustaining (by "doing best for" I assume you wish to preserve its existence in the future) a universal entity indefinitely if the universe and nature has repeatedly demonstrated that nothing lasts forever (even if they do last billions of years, still not forever)? Wouldn't that be going against a universal law?
I could get more existential but meh, it'll just make you depressed and you'll realize you're even more clueless then before. Then you have to deal with the "real" world and you're just like, "Do you people even realize that nothing...you know what nevermind"
Charles Brightman human beings should not exist today
True. I hope we have the tech to override the stuff we are tired of going thru over and over again..
@@rebeccaerb9935 Well, consider the following:
a. The post above was wrote 7 years ago as of this post. Some things have changed in my analysis.
b. God does not actually exist except for as a concept alone, the singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons, the universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning, and the 'gem' photon is most probably the eternally existent energy unit of this existence that makes up everything in this existence. (The 'gem' photon idea currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test). Galaxies and life just come and go in this eternally existent universe.
c. Outer space travel is not only dangerous, but deadly. Harmful cosmic radiation, not having proper gravity conditions, and many more items depending upon the species.
d. All life and and from this Earth is most probably going to die and go extinct. Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away.
e. The one singular ultimate answer to ALL questions in existence, including questions never even asked is: "It Does Not Ultimately Matter", or in today's vernacular "IDNUM". (OSICA)
@@daniellowe4269 "...the thing about existential discussions like this is that you're never going to arrive at a definitive answer."
The one singular ultimate answer to ALL questions in existence, including questions never even asked is: "It Does Not Ultimately Matter", or in today's vernacular "IDNUM". (OSICA)
Big Data
And dangerous ideas
I'd love to date-a him... :)
gangstabambi you both will make a great couple.
2:32 It's the wrong question to ask whether we should tell Jane. The right question is whether we should ask Jane whether she wants to know. The answer is of course yes, she should decide whether she wants to know and gets to know. Pretty shocking to see an "expert" ignoring the question of consent here.
Jaane made a HUGE MISTAKE
Cancer is not disease. Let her know of deficiency b17 vitamins
🤔that is interesting. When I take B vitamins I get super connected.
So I try to let that vitamin be a naturally gotten vitamin. I don't have cancer but I am in the belief that we are able to heal it or cure it.
"racist algorithms"... ouch.
Felis Extraterrestris That's actually a thing.
Too edgy for me to use in the Data Analytics Class I teach - lost me with "rape." Couple of other triggery type phrases. Not that they should be left off the table, but triggery.
BrightGarden Entrepreneurial Foundations
I’m the next 1-2 years the world be have a facelift
Did they follow Jane around or did they follow someone else? Could it be possible that Jane wanted to make quick money and used someone else that was living at her house to be Jane? If they had facial recognition,an e signature, a technological guru, and fingerprints?? And these people followed another unknowing person around and Jane is the one who got paid???? Possible??? Idk. Ask your machine!