Except for the fact that there's no NATO airpower, which has kind of been their signature for, ahh, the entire time they have existed.. I don't hate Russia, either, it's just not an accurate assessment.. Nato vs Russia would be a wicked fight for a while, but I don't think they could manage a multi-front, world war against all of NATO..
Thank you for providing us unbiased Media coverage. I still admire the coverage you gave to genocider war Tigray. You were genuinely voice of the voiceless. Thank you my friend.
The Comedian treachery of the Minsk Accords doesn't warrant him peace on his terms. He gambled his nation and prople's lives, and he lost. He has lost the world's sympathy for his cause and should accept his fate. When you vote a comedian as your president your country 100% will become a laughingstock for the rest of the world Ethnic Russians who were oppressed have the right to self-determination. New reality: Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts have held referendums. The citizens in these regions voted to join Russia. Any future peace negotiations will take into account the "new realities". High time for media to stop using the word " annexed" and start using the word " LIBERATED" which represent the truth. Ukraine should surrender unconditionally and reveal the truth on NATO after all they were used. Zelensky and the rest of them are monsters for forcing this war on Ukrainians that never had any chance to win or any real need to fight at all. After 700,000 people, mainly soldiers that lost their lives Zelensky wants territories back. It's like a comedian with two black eyes is claiming to have won the war. Give us a break Zelensky and go do something useful, you could have avoided all this
I feel for the Ukraine president because just like the rest of NATO he was presented with the details of the sanction package to be imposed by the west on Russia in April. It was in theory to cripple Russia in 60 days and force Russia to withdraw from Ukraine and seek peace within 90 days. He was promise the world in the way of weapons to get through this period little knowing there were major flaws in the sanction package and it would be an extended war.
as davidanon1568 stated, 3000 KG. One KG is 2.2 lbs. So, that's one massive glide bomb with huge destructive potential. And you can bet the Russians will make lots of them.
Most Japanese cities before and during WWII were built out of wood. During spring summer the US has bombed Japan into oblivion with mass destruction and mass casualties. The effect was much greater than what nuclear bombing later did. I think the narrative that the use of nuclear weapons helped to avoid ground invasion of Japan is completely false. The US has been using this argument for decades. What's the real reason? We might never know. Perhaps, they just wanted to use Japan as a live nuclear test site to see what happens.
One motive might habe been to show the strongman of Russia how strong America was. This idea might seem to be a bit speculative and shaky on the first glance, but appears more likely after looking at the calendar of the time. During the Potsdam Conference in Germany in summer 1945 President Truman asked Stalin to declare war on Japan and invade Chinese territory occupied by Japan three months after the German surrender, which had occured on 08 May 1945. Stalin agreed and on August 8 the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and Soviet forces invaded a certain part of China, which at the time was ocupied by Japan. In the meantime, some doubts may have emerged in Washington concerning the idea to persuade Moscow to invade. Two days before the Red Army was sent against Japan, the first atomic bomb had been dropped, and two days later - exactly on August 08 - the second one. Due to the official narrative these events are not somehow linked, - of course they are not, how could they ?
"See what happens" I draw your attention to the ABCC. Atomic blast causality centre that was set up after in Hiroshima attack. They offered no help to the survivors no medicine and no cash rather they observed for more than 20yrs particularly young girls that were subjected to the most intrusive medical experiments for many yrs. The Americans were very interested in their reproductive organs. If the American people knew what has been done in their name !
The real reason is the Soviet invasion of Manuchuria and later Korea. These two Japanese colonies provided vital raw materials and food. By the time Japan agreed to surrender in August 1945 they were on the verge of mass starvation that would have made any attempt to contest a US invasion futile.
I find the comparison between the use of strategic nuclear weapons against the Empire of Japan at the end of World War II and the hypothetical use of tactical nukes by the Russian Federation a bit far fetched. The actual war scenario points to an outcome in favour of Russia being achieved by conventional warfare exclusively. If tactical nukes are used at all, they will rather be launchd by the side which concludes that it cannot win the war with conventional means. That's Ukraine, not Russia. But even such a scenario is unlikely to occur since the western military masters of Ukraine are fully aware that if this box of Pandora once being opened the conflict will spiral down fastly and in an uncontrollable manner toward a full scale nuclear conflict, since every side - the U.S.A. and Russia - will immediatly feel the need to hurry up in order to avoid the destruction of its own nuclear arsenal before it can be employed. Furthermore, a first use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia could trigger exactly what Russia wants to avoid, i.e. a direct conflict between NATO and the Russian Federation. In order to avoid such an outcome, Moscow would rather swallow the bitter pill of huge losses on the battlefield. However, if said comparison is meant as kind of a wake up call to make people understand the dangerous nature of this conflict it is usefull and adequate.
Russia wants to avoid losing more soldiers if the West keeps sending an endless stream of weapons to Ukraine. So at some point Russia will eliminate the Ukraine destinations to send weapons to. ( these would be military, industrial, and command destinations ) Russian generals have already talked about doing this with conventional weapons.
The US also wanted to test nuclear weapons on Japan to see the effects. Their use wasn't really to prevent US casualties from an invasion of Japan, because there didn't have to be one. There could have been a negotiated peace but the US wouldn't accept such a peace.
The Soviets also got to witness the effects of a super-weapon that they didn't have, changing the the dynamic between the US and Soviets significantly.
@@ajazvo Yes it may well have been intended as a warning to the Soviets. All it did in that regard though was ensure that the Soviets would develop their own bomb as soon as possible (though they would have done that anyway).
Just watched Willy OAMs channel and he's a pro-Ukraine guy but his last video talks about how Ukrainian troops are retreating from their positions. Things are not looking good for Kiev.
Russia has a doctrine for using their nuclear weapons. Russia has never threatened with nuclear weapons they just repeat their doctrine. It's the West that keeps on bringing up the use of nuclear weapons. And that means you're in that ballpark. You should tell the 75 families in oregon, that Japan did not cause them to lose any of their heritage.
It's Russia started the nuclear threats. Doctrine or not. The West have said nothing about it other than in response to Russia's irresponsible sabre rattling.
So You telling that the US have used Nuclear on Japan which killed hundreds of thousands civilians for 75 American citizens. Civilians should never be attacked no matter what the circumstances. PERIOD.
Hello Mr. Voice of Reason just a idea when you cover global news and conflicts maybe you cold start doing updates on the Isreali hamas conflict most recently a major airstrike by Israel on the iranian terroist embassy but yeah, would love to see your throughts on the middle east conflict
It's 3000KG, so that's actually 3 metric tons, not three English tons. So the FAB 3000 is 6612 lbs not 6000 lbs. The difference is like throwing in more than a whole extra FAB 300.
@@tarstarkusz It was let out 79 years ago for dubious reasons. Russian generals have recently been saying that the war is taking too long, and that Russia should just flatten all military / industrial / government buildings in Ukraine, which can be done with large conventional bombs like the FAB 3000. Military comments that the FAB 3000 explosion looks similar to a small tactical nuke, but it's just a conventional bomb. ( Russia still has FAB 5000 and FAB 9000 in reserve )
@@SewTubular No, because the US was the only country that had them at the time. So pandora's box was closed again. A large yield conventional one is not out of the question and would not create the problems for Russia that a nuclear one would create.
@@tarstarkusz How was it closed again. The US knew how to make the bomb from that point on, and Russia caught up 4 years later. If you follow Oliver Stone he has a 10 part history series called "The Untold History of the United States". In the episode that covers WW2, he mentions that the US military was discussing destroying all of China using "the bomb", to eliminate China as a possible future peer competitor. ( the same could be done to Russia back then if Russia didn't have their own bomb ) I think people get crazy ideas when they have that much power in their hands.
Yes! So did parts of California, with incendiary Balloons floated across the Pacific ocean’s prevailing winds, from Japan. Also, the USA was invaded in WW2 by the Japanese Army. Alaska; eg Unalaska Island, an Island off the coast of mainland Alaska State.
Dispite the glide bombs of Russia (which are a problem for Ukraine), dispite the manpower shortage of Ukraine, dispite the lack of air support/defense in Ukraine, dispite the lack of ammunition in Ukraine, I still do not see the front lines moving.
The Americans used the atomic bomb against Japan to demonstrate to Russia that it had a weapon that it would use against it ,if Russia didn't toe the line. Stop peddling that crap about increased American casualties. America lost only 400,000 odd in the entire war. Russia lost over 30 millions.
Ukraine isn't fighting against Russia,, actually Ukrainian military is suppling the manpower in the fight of NATO against Russia.
Based on a recent video I saw, it looks like Ukraine is now supplying child power, instead of man power.
No, Ukraine isn't fighting against Russia,, actually Ukrainian military is suppling the manpower in the fight of -NATO- *"America"* against Russia!
So... fighting against russia
Except for the fact that there's no NATO airpower, which has kind of been their signature for, ahh, the entire time they have existed.. I don't hate Russia, either, it's just not an accurate assessment.. Nato vs Russia would be a wicked fight for a while, but I don't think they could manage a multi-front, world war against all of NATO..
@@mikemulligan5731 Nato is a complete joke
This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it.
I hope not
Ukies show despair. They feel every SLAP and coming defeat...
Russia will not negotiate with kiev now unless they hand over those wanted by russia
Kyiv wasn't asking for a negotiation. Negotiating with Russia is a fallacy anyway.
@@bg1616 yea I was incorrect kiev is irrelevant. Negotiations with Washington is what I meant
@jonathon5411 Washington and its fifth column is not even in charge of itself at the moment so good luck with that.
@@bg1616 well no negotiations then russia will just keep moving forward
@@jonathon5411 The Polish border is not that far away.
Zelensky has no choice either he completely agree with Russia or pack his bags escape to NATO county
Bravo Ruussiiaa 🇷🇺 🐣 🇷🇺
UUURRRAA 🙏
Thank you for providing us unbiased Media coverage. I still admire the coverage you gave to genocider war Tigray. You were genuinely voice of the voiceless. Thank you my friend.
The Comedian treachery of the Minsk Accords doesn't warrant him peace on his terms. He gambled his nation and prople's lives, and he lost. He has lost the world's sympathy for his cause and should accept his fate.
When you vote a comedian as your president your country 100% will become a laughingstock for the rest of the world
Ethnic Russians who were oppressed have the right to self-determination. New reality: Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts have held referendums.
The citizens in these regions voted to join Russia. Any future peace negotiations will take into account the "new realities".
High time for media to stop using the word " annexed" and start using the word " LIBERATED" which represent the truth.
Ukraine should surrender unconditionally and reveal the truth on NATO after all they were used.
Zelensky and the rest of them are monsters for forcing this war on Ukrainians that never had any chance to win or any real need to fight at all.
After 700,000 people, mainly soldiers that lost their lives Zelensky wants territories back. It's like a comedian with two black eyes is claiming to have won the war. Give us a break Zelensky and go do something useful, you could have avoided all this
zelensky is completely controlled by the US deep state.
Well stated.
I feel for the Ukraine president because just like the rest of NATO he was presented with the details of the sanction package to be imposed by the west on Russia in April. It was in theory to cripple Russia in 60 days and force Russia to withdraw from Ukraine and seek peace within 90 days. He was promise the world in the way of weapons to get through this period little knowing there were major flaws in the sanction package and it would be an extended war.
In my opinion the use of nukes was also a display of power to enforce American dominants after the war.
as davidanon1568 stated, 3000 KG. One KG is 2.2 lbs. So, that's one massive glide bomb with huge destructive potential. And you can bet the Russians will make lots of them.
They already have a HUGE stockpile of them from the Soviet times....
Most Japanese cities before and during WWII were built out of wood. During spring summer the US has bombed Japan into oblivion with mass destruction and mass casualties. The effect was much greater than what nuclear bombing later did. I think the narrative that the use of nuclear weapons helped to avoid ground invasion of Japan is completely false. The US has been using this argument for decades. What's the real reason? We might never know. Perhaps, they just wanted to use Japan as a live nuclear test site to see what happens.
One motive might habe been to show the strongman of Russia how strong America was. This idea might seem to be a bit speculative and shaky on the first glance, but appears more likely after looking at the calendar of the time. During the Potsdam Conference in Germany in summer 1945 President Truman asked Stalin to declare war on Japan and invade Chinese territory occupied by Japan three months after the German surrender, which had occured on 08 May 1945. Stalin agreed and on August 8 the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and Soviet forces invaded a certain part of China, which at the time was ocupied by Japan. In the meantime, some doubts may have emerged in Washington concerning the idea to persuade Moscow to invade. Two days before the Red Army was sent against Japan, the first atomic bomb had been dropped, and two days later - exactly on August 08 - the second one. Due to the official narrative these events are not somehow linked, - of course they are not, how could they ?
"See what happens"
I draw your attention to the ABCC. Atomic blast causality centre that was set up after in Hiroshima attack. They offered no help to the survivors no medicine and no cash rather they observed for more than 20yrs particularly young girls that were subjected to the most intrusive medical experiments for many yrs. The Americans were very interested in their reproductive organs. If the American people knew what has been done in their name !
The Manhattan Project was the single most expensive program the US has ever done. Probably bigger than Apollo. That's the real reason.
The real reason is the Soviet invasion of Manuchuria and later Korea.
These two Japanese colonies provided vital raw materials and food.
By the time Japan agreed to surrender in August 1945 they were on the verge of mass starvation that would have made any attempt to contest a US invasion futile.
You say its false then you say will never know the real reason😂😂
I find the comparison between the use of strategic nuclear weapons against the Empire of Japan at the end of World War II and the hypothetical use of tactical nukes by the Russian Federation a bit far fetched. The actual war scenario points to an outcome in favour of Russia being achieved by conventional warfare exclusively.
If tactical nukes are used at all, they will rather be launchd by the side which concludes that it cannot win the war with conventional means. That's Ukraine, not Russia.
But even such a scenario is unlikely to occur since the western military masters of Ukraine are fully aware that if this box of Pandora once being opened the conflict will spiral down fastly and in an uncontrollable manner toward a full scale nuclear conflict, since every side - the U.S.A. and Russia - will immediatly feel the need to hurry up in order to avoid the destruction of its own nuclear arsenal before it can be employed.
Furthermore, a first use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia could trigger exactly what Russia wants to avoid, i.e. a direct conflict between NATO and the Russian Federation. In order to avoid such an outcome, Moscow would rather swallow the bitter pill of huge losses on the battlefield.
However, if said comparison is meant as kind of a wake up call to make people understand the dangerous nature of this conflict it is usefull and adequate.
Russia wants to avoid losing more soldiers if the West keeps sending an endless stream of weapons to Ukraine. So at some point Russia will eliminate the Ukraine destinations to send weapons to. ( these would be military, industrial, and command destinations ) Russian generals have already talked about doing this with conventional weapons.
The US also wanted to test nuclear weapons on Japan to see the effects. Their use wasn't really to prevent US casualties from an invasion of Japan, because there didn't have to be one. There could have been a negotiated peace but the US wouldn't accept such a peace.
Dresden was the same, a horrific experiment!
The Soviets also got to witness the effects of a super-weapon that they didn't have, changing the the dynamic between the US and Soviets significantly.
@@ajazvo Yes it may well have been intended as a warning to the Soviets. All it did in that regard though was ensure that the Soviets would develop their own bomb as soon as possible (though they would have done that anyway).
True
There could not be a negotiated peace with imperial Japan. China for one, would never have agreed to that.
Just watched Willy OAMs channel and he's a pro-Ukraine guy but his last video talks about how Ukrainian troops are retreating from their positions. Things are not looking good for Kiev.
Brilliant analysis on the use of nuclear weapons, brilliant comparison.
Very interesting insight.
Subscribed.
I have been talking about this for over a year. Why should Russia tolerate losses of troops and civilians when they have nukes?
Because 70% of ukrainian population is actually russians. After all they need to live together.
Thank you brother!
Yes VoR ,You are quite right.
Nonsense. Russia has never threatened to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine.
Thanks as always great summary 👍
Russia has a doctrine for using their nuclear weapons.
Russia has never threatened with nuclear weapons they just repeat their doctrine.
It's the West that keeps on bringing up the use of nuclear weapons. And that means you're in that ballpark.
You should tell the 75 families in oregon, that Japan did not cause them to lose any of their heritage.
It's Russia started the nuclear threats. Doctrine or not. The West have said nothing about it other than in response to Russia's irresponsible sabre rattling.
Please explain that last paragraph?
@@TheJaxsonjack à
You stated that Japan never attacked the continental United States.
That sentence was in reference to your statement
@@AJdet-2 No no. I was just asking for an explanation. Not disputing what you stated.
What about those "75 families"?
So You telling that the US have used Nuclear on Japan which killed hundreds of thousands civilians for 75 American citizens.
Civilians should never be attacked no matter what the circumstances. PERIOD.
I heard the Russians came out with a land based rocket propelled glide bomb requiring no aircraft, A mini cruise missile
I hear Russians shoot their own planes down, drop bombs on their own territory, then call Zelensky the clown 🤡
They already have the FAB 5000 and FAB 9000 dumb bombs, so if a bomber jet could lift it, then these could be converted to glide-bombs.
Thanks brother for your insightful analysis
The bear finally breaking the antlers of the deer
Just...Good Morning M and F. J.
Hello Mr. Voice of Reason just a idea when you cover global news and conflicts maybe you cold start doing updates on the Isreali hamas conflict most recently a major airstrike by Israel on the iranian terroist embassy but yeah, would love to see your throughts on the middle east conflict
Do you just label every country that is against the Israeli Zionist regimd as "terrorists"? The word is starting to lose it's luster..
God help us
There's underground parking garages in Kharkov that were used to store tanks.
The vor, was hoping you could make update on battlefield promised land?
3:02 that's ma boy FABolous 3000
you did warn previously about Russian air power been a game changer, and so it's proving.also a British general warned last year of it.
It's 3000KG, so that's actually 3 metric tons, not three English tons. So the FAB 3000 is 6612 lbs not 6000 lbs. The difference is like throwing in more than a whole extra FAB 300.
300kg is more than 612lbs...
great commentary on the FABs
I wish you would do a daily video debunking denys davydov nightly propaganda videos
Lviv 🤫🤫🤫
can Russian Tu160s drop the 9000kg glides from the stratosphere, 20 miles up? wouldn't that be outside the range of AD?
The prevailing winds generally go East so.....
Modern Tactical Nuclear Weapons have reduced radiation
Happy April Fools
April fools people.....
Russia is going to lose support among its allies if it were to use them.
You think China, Iran, Africa, and North Korea are going to suddenly fall in love with the West ?
@@SewTubular All of them have big incentives not to let this particular pandora out of its box.
@@tarstarkusz It was let out 79 years ago for dubious reasons. Russian generals have recently been saying that the war is taking too long, and that Russia should just flatten all military / industrial / government buildings in Ukraine, which can be done with large conventional bombs like the FAB 3000. Military comments that the FAB 3000 explosion looks similar to a small tactical nuke, but it's just a conventional bomb. ( Russia still has FAB 5000 and FAB 9000 in reserve )
@@SewTubular No, because the US was the only country that had them at the time. So pandora's box was closed again. A large yield conventional one is not out of the question and would not create the problems for Russia that a nuclear one would create.
@@tarstarkusz How was it closed again. The US knew how to make the bomb from that point on, and Russia caught up 4 years later. If you follow Oliver Stone he has a 10 part history series called "The Untold History of the United States". In the episode that covers WW2, he mentions that the US military was discussing destroying all of China using "the bomb", to eliminate China as a possible future peer competitor. ( the same could be done to Russia back then if Russia didn't have their own bomb )
I think people get crazy ideas when they have that much power in their hands.
So all the pro ukr bots will be out a job soon?
This channel is bad for censorship
oregon was attacked in ww2
Yes! So did parts of California, with incendiary Balloons floated across the Pacific ocean’s prevailing winds, from Japan. Also, the USA was invaded in WW2 by the Japanese Army. Alaska; eg Unalaska Island, an Island off the coast of mainland Alaska State.
This is an April Fools video?
Dispite the glide bombs of Russia (which are a problem for Ukraine), dispite the manpower shortage of Ukraine, dispite the lack of air support/defense in Ukraine, dispite the lack of ammunition in Ukraine, I still do not see the front lines moving.
The Americans used the atomic bomb against Japan to demonstrate to Russia that it had a weapon that it would use against it ,if Russia didn't toe the line. Stop peddling that crap about increased American casualties. America lost only 400,000 odd in the entire war. Russia lost over 30 millions.
FAB GAME CHANGES.