No. relative to the amount of energy released it is the most efficient form of clean energy we have. Heat is radiation, so anyone who complains about radiation as "unclean" in this context is being disingenuous or a moron as it's not the same in any way given what we are facing.
We are at 1.73 Centigrade above 1750 baseline. We are in the sixth mass extinction .Arctic ice meltdown tipping point reached in 1984 .2 degrees Centigrade is a false tipping point made by an economist not a climate scientist.Also,let's not forget the aerosol masking effect which shields us from a certain amount of solar radiation.
I wasn't that high 3 years ago. We are at about 1.55 or 1.6 right now compared to ~1750. The 1750 baseline is generally agreed to have been about 0.2 degrees cooler, but there's some debate due to lack of good/accurate measurements. Regardless, we're pretty screwed.
Nuclear is very carbon intensive because of all the steel flasks made to store the waste.
No. relative to the amount of energy released it is the most efficient form of clean energy we have. Heat is radiation, so anyone who complains about radiation as "unclean" in this context is being disingenuous or a moron as it's not the same in any way given what we are facing.
We are at 1.73 Centigrade above 1750 baseline. We are in the sixth mass extinction .Arctic ice meltdown tipping point reached in 1984 .2 degrees Centigrade is a false tipping point made by an economist not a climate scientist.Also,let's not forget the aerosol masking effect which shields us from a certain amount of solar radiation.
I wasn't that high 3 years ago. We are at about 1.55 or 1.6 right now compared to ~1750. The 1750 baseline is generally agreed to have been about 0.2 degrees cooler, but there's some debate due to lack of good/accurate measurements. Regardless, we're pretty screwed.
Thanos was right