After sujatha, no one is good enough when it comes to screenwriting , that's the fact ... Both the filmmakers mani and shankar are struggling to cope it up ...
Completely agree . 2.0 with a great script would have been bigger than bahubali . Even now babubali has so many repeat views in Netflix because the script . Visual appeal can go only so much and has a short span .Good script and the emotional connect has longitivtiy .
I agree with emotional connection missing..But so is the case with many marvel and big budgeted hollywood scifi movies.Hopefully Indian 2 will bring back the old shankar.
@@parthibanarivalagan3119 Marvel rides on emotional arcs of it's characters 😂 although it's the same template over and over again.. the only reason it's still working at the box office is because the audience are emotionally invested in the characters.. there are many Hollywood movies which flopped in the past 2 years.. Mostly reboots.. cuz they didn't have a proper emotional arc binding the characters.. The difference between Enthiran and 2.0 is that Enthiran took time in setting up the characters which made us genuinely interested in them..unlike 2.0 which was just exposition-setpiece-exposition.. Enthiran was a theme centric film which required an emotional arc whereas 2.0 missing it made it an action-centric film even though it had a good plotpoint.
At first time, i felt the film was a bit slow in it's first half. But going to the movie for the second time, was really good , as the film takes on its own time. Its pace is steadily building up and kicks off in the second half .
@@thisisDway no doubt visuals r superb and outstanding but the story was not working der thats y i didn't connect to the movie i was just watching the movie i was not into the movie, , i was expecting something out lager experience which was not der, the movie was picked up at entry of 2.0 at climax,but unfortunately that was there only for sometime thats makes me disappointed..
DAY'Z TV pity it don’t work for u..am satisfied enough, Shankar delivered visual extravaganza and he delivered , tat was enough...perspective matters too
This film is same as "Indian" and "Anniyan", where we have a character who has a back story of losing someone beloved, like Indian Thaatha losing his daughter because of corruption and Ambi losing his sister because of authorities failing to do their job. Now that character will start killing everyone who does the same crime. This is the story of 2.0, you can match the characters. But Shankar use different environments to set this story.
The problem in 2.0 is in the emotional connect with audience - it's missing , rather take Indian or Anniyan where the emotional scenes are magnetic , it was not there in 2.0 & there's no scene or even a dialogue where chitti was supporting humans , say when pakshi was giving his opinion on the negative aspects of humans , there should be atleast an opposing dialogue from chitti where he should've narrated a good stand for humans , like putting out the positive aspects of humans where humans have saved the earth , that's the place where the screenwriting went weak , that couldn't hype up the clash that's gonna happen between the two .
I agree with him. Shankar wasted this golden opportunity. People won't come again to see VFX or technical aspects of the film, it must have a story, emotions. Hope he has good story for Indian 2, if he doesn't have it, he must better not ruin the classic film.
I generally agree with you but this seems quite a delibrate attempt to malign the movie or simply that you were too thick to understand what happens. You talk about why "pakshi raja" the villain does not speak to the public. Did you not watch the bit in the movie where he, the old man, stood at street corners and outside mobile shops educating people? When he was a common man, people did not listen. That's exactly why he turned villain. Now you want him to repeat the speech again? And no emotional connect? You have to be made of lead, if you didn't feel for the birds and the message conveyed in the movie.
Well, he clearly mentioned addressing the people like Indian thatha and anniyan in stadium. I mean, when they are in the peak of what they did because people didn't listen to them earlier. Then how come, addressing them before becoming the pakshi raja soul matter ? Secondly, the emotional connect with characters is what he mentioned as missing. Not the birds dieing and all ?
@@410chandu Then he should watch anniyan. Melodrama was avoided in this movie and it has to be appreciated. In the middle of the fight the villain should break out and give a speech? LOL. This guy is only fit to review the crap that Mani churns out. The emotional connect with Chitti was already established. There was no need to redo the whole thing.
I am so surprised to see this genius go all out and support Sarkar which was one of the biggest disasters in 2018. But u will be called a genius only when u ridicule an iconic movie like 2.0 which has the whole world watching.
Rangan is like chitti gone rouge now a days.. just hated the same person whom i used to admire .. Rangan showing the dilemma of a once successful but now failing reviewer at 2.0 & CCV.. coz people loved it...
The fun element throughout the movie wss missing... In robot there's a part where the chitti talks with mosquito...that scene was so illogical but we never felt that way instead we enjoyed that part and gone with the movie
I agree , though the scene was irrelevant it established a sense of humour for the audience , it's missing in 2.0 for chitti , but it was there when "2.0" red chip rajini was activated 😅
please listen to Jeyamohan interviews regarding the Aura - he says it not a SCI-FI film...this Science thriller film ...both are distinict...don't mess up
Looking at Enthiran, there was alot of reasoning to be questioned, but compared to that movie... This movie seemed more of a Sci-Fi than Enthiran can ever be.
according to south indians this movie is better then all the marvel movies, avengers movie, heck even the upcoming avengers 4... the pride this fools have
04:56 i m glad this point abt song has arisen...see every movie can have song..bt the thing is does it need to ..i m glad bharadwaj has raised this point..because the time where we as audience start to question...whether we need song or two in a movie for us to feel motivated to go watch it in theatres....and teh answer is we don't need to...it has now bn 5 to 7 yrs since Hollywood films started to make a splash and yes these films dont have songs... songs in case of essential Genre like musical, romantic is a different thing but in an action,adventure,,realistic ,suspense,cop drama,horror,gangster film..it shd necessarily be dispensed with rightfully... plus we dont have musicians like rammoothy or naushad or d. burman ..who can create magic when it comes to composing or film makerrs like satyajit ray, raj kapoor, k balchandran ,mani ratman who understand music and its cruciality to a narrative... hight time this move takes place across all 5 0r 6 major film industries in india
A difference between a great sci-fi movie & could've been better movie , is based upon the connectivity that we get from the characters in the movie , for instance in ' inception ' the story line was simple a dad wants to get back to her daughter , the moment when he got stuck in the time loop , it made us feel for that character & this was not there in 2.0 it was all about a good vs evil concept it stayed artificial because none of the characters gave that 'emotion' , but in endhiran the love for chitti worked out when we wanted chitti to stay with us as a human when chitti is being dismantled , that's where endhiran won as a great movie . But considering the vision of Shankar sir that he had on this film it was all about the "Experience" with a good script . Anyway we must take this as Step one in 3D film making & we must appreciate screen writers & directors to do such great films so that we can celebrate our Indian cinema :)
2pointO was perfect. even sounds vfx story are perfect for the script.. they showed the message in short time as like hollywood films.. there is no disappointments regarding the movie .. they could length the 2.O chitti scns
After watching this video I understand that you don't see it as a bad film. But you should mention the positive aspects of a film in your reviews as well.
Mokka movie eduthittu marana excuse panraanga😂 people who support this crap are saying this is Indian attempt etc but failed to accept the failure of Micromax lava carbon and Indian brands and people chose xiaomi OPPO vivo why? Quality. All others who are not fan boys could only be amused out of disbelief of witnessing such a horrible big budget film.
I'm no critic or writer..but we didn't have enough scenes to engage you emotionally later in movie...trying to hold you through technical aspects...that's what he means I guess...
I felt that there was definitely a special touch missing. The visuals were definitely amazing, however, the, screenplay could have been way better, it was too straight forward and bland. Some jokes fell flat. However, this is just a stepping stone. I'm sure there will be way better movies in the future.
This gentleman is giving justification... what’s the necessity... it’s clear that the director couldn’t deliver the best as he used to be ... vfx/ vulgarity etc doesn’t make sense until there is human connect.... and Shankar failed to deliver it... his intentions were to overcome BB-2 box office feat... so he got disturbed and lead to disaster... it’s the naked truth... accept or not... 👍🏻
Do you know that the duration of the movie was above 3 hours and was edited to make it appealing to pan Indian audience and if possible to Non Indians. Coming to vulgarity , was there any vulgarity in the movie ? Did he actually say he wanted to overcome BB2? Who are you to judge man?
@@ekminreviews.8054 vulgarity being the opening scene with one of the students making obscene comments at robot Nila & post the arrival of Chitti 2.0, Chitti unzips Nila's back.
I actually thought movie should have ended where Vaseegaran was felicitated by govt and since it's titled 2.0 there was climax right and everything. Climax was actually tiresome.
The fact that this is a new attempt in Tamil cinema is all the more reason to criticize the film’s plot (mostly the elements like reincarnation). If they know that they’re going to spend a lot of time and money on technicalities, what’s keeping them from having a more compelling storyline?
No pakshi Rajan could not talk to people directly because there was a lot of politics being played to finish the negative energy off. The moment pakshi Rajan got to speak was when he took vasigaran's possession and in that moment you know how wild he was and at that time he became the villain for the world
I think the mix was not great for this film, the ghost aura thing was bollocks, and Endhira Logathu should have been played in between the movie. The characters should have been more fleshed out emotionally and perhaps the camera should have been slicker even when there was no action going on! I felt that the cinematography was like watching every other Tamil film. Only in brief moments did I feel like I was watching a blockbuster.
Entertainment is very subjective. 2.0 may not worked for you, but it worked so well for many. U don't have to keep on spread your dissapoinment on every video. Or maybe u just want to make some cash by giving controversial opinion..
Why can't you take his negative review if it worked for you? Why shouldn't he say how much he disliked a movie, just like he says how much he likes a movie?
@@GuruPrasanna I don't mind if he keep on talking about his hate till the end of time. But to keep on saying his dissapoinment in every video, which is obviously to get more views and squeeze out some cash out of it, I'm my opinion it's a bit unethical. that's all Guru, u don't have to get tense for it, chill..
Some guys were chanting on emotional connect is missing ...fun is missing..?? R u people drunk...?? Even b4 the rls did the state abt there is fun factor in the film??? Its just full in the super new concept with jaw dropping visuals...thats all what they said..and it has a super story too...!!! Why u ppl bringing unnecessary stuffs into the script?
U r a reviewer , actually everyone can do that , u too know that, don't think u know everything about filmmaking , if u do , make a film Bharadwaj sir ,😊,
If Shankar sir would have called this whole thing a bluff in the end, it's nothing but a plot created by the mastermind vasi along with pakshi for the double motive (Vasi to bring back Chitti and Pakshi to save birds). Justify that this big scale bluff was required to bring the mobile industry scam to light. BR and other critics would have probably called it smart script/writing just like they did for CCV
The Maniratnam lobby always degrades Shankar's movies and finds the lamest faults.And any to which lobby Mr.BR belongs to. BR is the Torch Bearer of Maniratnam lobby
2.O - in simple words it’s a COMIC without LOGIC... whereas BB-2 is a EPIC . The producers rather would have marketed /projected 2.O , a movie for children...👍🏻
Sridhar Kumar yes jumping from mountain to mountain , carrying a huge lingam in shoulder , flying from palm trees like birds , pulling a huge statue single handedly are all very logical and epic 😏
in fact, I also believe the same thing. BGM completely killed Sound mixing and they also wasted raajali song at the end. what I observed from the movie after observing BGM and Sound mixing is that they just killed the movie. Now it's like watching anime.
It’s high time that BR should stop spreading negativity around 2.0. It looks as if he is being paid from other side ( Tollywood industry ). If the movie is good, u cannot stop it from breaking BB’s all times collection record
The problem is with you and not with many of us. Please don’t put your negative thoughts into our system. You are influencing us and not reviewing. Stop.....Stop......Stop......
@@MMaheshThakur so if I wish to criticize kohli for playing wrong shot I should have played for national team right? Very good so to criticize politician we need to be atleast a mla 😂 you fan boys of shankar are acting as genius. Go watch train to busan or flu not Hollywood just Asian films see how budget is spent with brain
The background explains the level of VFX in india !
Shankar should hire a good writer asap or all his efforts, grandeur and vision might go vain.
After sujatha, no one is good enough when it comes to screenwriting , that's the fact ... Both the filmmakers mani and shankar are struggling to cope it up ...
@@amazinghumans3039 sujatha was only dialogue writter in shankar movies the stories where written by shankar itself.
@@amazinghumans3039 But still there are talented writers out there in the industry
Completely agree . 2.0 with a great script would have been bigger than bahubali . Even now babubali has so many repeat views in Netflix because the script . Visual appeal can go only so much and has a short span .Good script and the emotional connect has longitivtiy .
Hahaha he should do something about his ego. After I movie producer aascar Ravichandran is gone forever. Since Lyca has tons of cash they will survive
I agree with emotional connection missing..But so is the case with many marvel and big budgeted hollywood scifi movies.Hopefully Indian 2 will bring back the old shankar.
Indian 2 is dropped :(
@@parthibanarivalagan3119 wtf? It's still in shooting no
@@CS2K23 Yeah , initially it was said to be drooped 😅
Again dir shankar reconfirmed the shoot ✌️
@@parthibanarivalagan3119 Marvel rides on emotional arcs of it's characters 😂 although it's the same template over and over again.. the only reason it's still working at the box office is because the audience are emotionally invested in the characters.. there are many Hollywood movies which flopped in the past 2 years.. Mostly reboots.. cuz they didn't have a proper emotional arc binding the characters.. The difference between Enthiran and 2.0 is that Enthiran took time in setting up the characters which made us genuinely interested in them..unlike 2.0 which was just exposition-setpiece-exposition.. Enthiran was a theme centric film which required an emotional arc whereas 2.0 missing it made it an action-centric film even though it had a good plotpoint.
@@RR-ie8ph i agree with that , at the end we need a good movie .
No songs or comedy track
Just a straight story telling
I even liked this movie a lot
It’s a path breaking movie
comedy track? there were so many forced bad jokes in the film
that grin at 4:16 when talking about songs in Shankar movies shows the genuineness in ur opinions.
At first time, i felt the film was a bit slow in it's first half.
But going to the movie for the second time, was really good , as the film takes on its own time. Its pace is steadily building up and kicks off in the second half .
Nandha Balamurugan second half was bore first half was interesting
Ryt emotional connection was not der in 2.0...!
DAY'Z TV it’s not an award film to have connection , rendering and all, this film mainly concentrates on visual experience
@@thisisDway no doubt visuals r superb and outstanding but the story was not working der thats y i didn't connect to the movie i was just watching the movie i was not into the movie, , i was expecting something out lager experience which was not der, the movie was picked up at entry of 2.0 at climax,but unfortunately that was there only for sometime thats makes me disappointed..
DAY'Z TV pity it don’t work for u..am satisfied enough, Shankar delivered visual extravaganza and he delivered , tat was enough...perspective matters too
@@thisisDway Aacha now ur feeling pity on me ,🤣 ok
DAY'Z TV ofcourse 😂😂
Blockbuster film 2.0
A tremendous effort by the makers and world class visuals. It needs huge support and encouragement from all.
Agreed. But the writing was juvenile. A movie of this caliber deserved a better screen play.
Just watch 2.0 in 3D- amazing Hollywood Level
Normally I don't like critics because 99 % people don't have knowledge about filmaking or writing
BR is India's best critic
Sujatha sir presence badly missed in I and 2.0 😶😶
Same ppl said when I was released now again and again. Shankar is lost in his ego
@@uhtijmai -ego how?
I would rather say the screen magic was missing , i feel like the magic elements in Shankar sir film was missing from ' I ' till 2.0
@@uhtijmai what ego ?? Sujatha is no more ...so Shankar couldn't afford ! What's there for ego around over here
Good movie. Family entertainer. Must watch in 3D.
This film is same as "Indian" and "Anniyan", where we have a character who has a back story of losing someone beloved, like Indian Thaatha losing his daughter because of corruption and Ambi losing his sister because of authorities failing to do their job. Now that character will start killing everyone who does the same crime. This is the story of 2.0, you can match the characters. But Shankar use different environments to set this story.
The problem in 2.0 is in the emotional connect with audience - it's missing , rather take Indian or Anniyan where the emotional scenes are magnetic , it was not there in 2.0 & there's no scene or even a dialogue where chitti was supporting humans , say when pakshi was giving his opinion on the negative aspects of humans , there should be atleast an opposing dialogue from chitti where he should've narrated a good stand for humans , like putting out the positive aspects of humans where humans have saved the earth , that's the place where the screenwriting went weak , that couldn't hype up the clash that's gonna happen between the two .
I agree with you... There is no emotional connect in recent sankar movies..
I agree with him. Shankar wasted this golden opportunity. People won't come again to see VFX or technical aspects of the film, it must have a story, emotions. Hope he has good story for Indian 2, if he doesn't have it, he must better not ruin the classic film.
Now that the 2d version is out... How do you think the movie plays out. I am guilty of missing out on the 3d version. #askbr
I generally agree with you but this seems quite a delibrate attempt to malign the movie or simply that you were too thick to understand what happens. You talk about why "pakshi raja" the villain does not speak to the public. Did you not watch the bit in the movie where he, the old man, stood at street corners and outside mobile shops educating people? When he was a common man, people did not listen. That's exactly why he turned villain. Now you want him to repeat the speech again?
And no emotional connect? You have to be made of lead, if you didn't feel for the birds and the message conveyed in the movie.
Well, he clearly mentioned addressing the people like Indian thatha and anniyan in stadium. I mean, when they are in the peak of what they did because people didn't listen to them earlier. Then how come, addressing them before becoming the pakshi raja soul matter ?
Secondly, the emotional connect with characters is what he mentioned as missing. Not the birds dieing and all ?
@@410chandu Then he should watch anniyan. Melodrama was avoided in this movie and it has to be appreciated. In the middle of the fight the villain should break out and give a speech? LOL. This guy is only fit to review the crap that Mani churns out. The emotional connect with Chitti was already established. There was no need to redo the whole thing.
I am so surprised to see this genius go all out and support Sarkar which was one of the biggest disasters in 2018. But u will be called a genius only when u ridicule an iconic movie like 2.0 which has the whole world watching.
I too agree with u, BR is too biased.
Rangan is like chitti gone rouge now a days.. just hated the same person whom i used to admire .. Rangan showing the dilemma of a once successful but now failing reviewer at 2.0 & CCV.. coz people loved it...
The fun element throughout the movie wss missing...
In robot there's a part where the chitti talks with mosquito...that scene was so illogical but we never felt that way instead we enjoyed that part and gone with the movie
I agree , though the scene was irrelevant it established a sense of humour for the audience , it's missing in 2.0 for chitti , but it was there when "2.0" red chip rajini was activated 😅
please listen to Jeyamohan interviews regarding the Aura - he says it not a SCI-FI film...this Science thriller film ...both are distinict...don't mess up
Movie s so good....
Technical good movie
Looking at Enthiran, there was alot of reasoning to be questioned, but compared to that movie... This movie seemed more of a Sci-Fi than Enthiran can ever be.
Can we will get Sci fi thriller like inception interstellar looper someday from Indian directors?
It will never happen in india.our audience don't have that maturity
Directors have the potential , unfortunately our Tamil audience couldn't get them
A sci fi movie like 24 was not well received. Forget inception, looper or interstellar
@@adithyasaikrishnan lets say they made a movie targeting scifi audience and they see a romcom and song sequences with flawed script
according to south indians this movie is better then all the marvel movies, avengers movie, heck even the upcoming avengers 4... the pride this fools have
animecool999 don't include all states of south india..every south indian other than tamil hates tamils..u can ask ur kanada telugu or mallus
04:56 i m glad this point abt song has arisen...see every movie can have song..bt the thing is does it need to ..i m glad bharadwaj has raised this point..because the time where we as audience start to question...whether we need song or two in a movie for us to feel motivated to go watch it in theatres....and teh answer is we don't need to...it has now bn 5 to 7 yrs since Hollywood films started to make a splash and yes these films dont have songs... songs in case of essential Genre like musical, romantic is a different thing but in an action,adventure,,realistic ,suspense,cop drama,horror,gangster film..it shd necessarily be dispensed with rightfully... plus we dont have musicians like rammoothy or naushad or d. burman ..who can create magic when it comes to composing or film makerrs like satyajit ray, raj kapoor, k balchandran ,mani ratman who understand music and its cruciality to a narrative... hight time this move takes place across all 5 0r 6 major film industries in india
A difference between a great sci-fi movie & could've been better movie , is based upon the connectivity that we get from the characters in the movie , for instance in ' inception ' the story line was simple a dad wants to get back to her daughter , the moment when he got stuck in the time loop , it made us feel for that character & this was not there in 2.0 it was all about a good vs evil concept it stayed artificial because none of the characters gave that 'emotion' , but in endhiran the love for chitti worked out when we wanted chitti to stay with us as a human when chitti is being dismantled , that's where endhiran won as a great movie . But considering the vision of Shankar sir that he had on this film it was all about the "Experience" with a good script . Anyway we must take this as Step one in 3D film making & we must appreciate screen writers & directors to do such great films so that we can celebrate our Indian cinema :)
2pointO was perfect. even sounds vfx story are perfect for the script.. they showed the message in short time as like hollywood films..
there is no disappointments regarding the movie ..
they could length the 2.O chitti scns
After watching this video I understand that you don't see it as a bad film. But you should mention the positive aspects of a film in your reviews as well.
Why No questions from fb comment section addressed in this ..?
A lot of fanboys barking at Bharadwaj for pointing out the flaws of 2.0... Get a life, people
Mokka movie eduthittu marana excuse panraanga😂 people who support this crap are saying this is Indian attempt etc but failed to accept the failure of Micromax lava carbon and Indian brands and people chose xiaomi OPPO vivo why? Quality. All others who are not fan boys could only be amused out of disbelief of witnessing such a horrible big budget film.
Thanks for doing this in English. We in North learning about South Cinema Genius.
You are telling some problems in script...what is the problem.. everything is at correct shape only
I'm no critic or writer..but we didn't have enough scenes to engage you emotionally later in movie...trying to hold you through technical aspects...that's what he means I guess...
Ye taklu batayega ki kya hota h si fi film....
Pls mak size big on question showing in vdo
A good film technically but requires a stronger story. The emotional connect with the characters were missing
I felt that there was definitely a special touch missing. The visuals were definitely amazing, however, the, screenplay could have been way better, it was too straight forward and bland. Some jokes fell flat. However, this is just a stepping stone. I'm sure there will be way better movies in the future.
Why so much criticism for this film?
This film was the best cenematic experience I ever had in a film hall.it was just magical
You are giving poor reviews is because you want popularity.
This gentleman is giving justification... what’s the necessity... it’s clear that the director couldn’t deliver the best as he used to be ... vfx/ vulgarity etc doesn’t make sense until there is human connect.... and Shankar failed to deliver it... his intentions were to overcome BB-2 box office feat... so he got disturbed and lead to disaster... it’s the naked truth... accept or not... 👍🏻
Do you know that the duration of the movie was above 3 hours and was edited to make it appealing to pan Indian audience and if possible to Non Indians. Coming to vulgarity , was there any vulgarity in the movie ? Did he actually say he wanted to overcome BB2? Who are you to judge man?
@@ekminreviews.8054 vulgarity being the opening scene with one of the students making obscene comments at robot Nila & post the arrival of Chitti 2.0, Chitti unzips Nila's back.
@@KamenRidyaa So stripping thamanna off of her dress in Bahubali was not obscene to yoy? Dancing with three item girls was not obscene..
@@ekminreviews.8054 Baahubali2 was absent of all this. Baahubali1 you got that right, though I liked part 2 the best.
I actually thought movie should have ended where Vaseegaran was felicitated by govt and since it's titled 2.0 there was climax right and everything. Climax was actually tiresome.
The fact that this is a new attempt in Tamil cinema is all the more reason to criticize the film’s plot (mostly the elements like reincarnation). If they know that they’re going to spend a lot of time and money on technicalities, what’s keeping them from having a more compelling storyline?
ya i also felt like uuuu(now shankar scripts are not having good emotional connect)
The White background is too distracting
No pakshi Rajan could not talk to people directly because there was a lot of politics being played to finish the negative energy off. The moment pakshi Rajan got to speak was when he took vasigaran's possession and in that moment you know how wild he was and at that time he became the villain for the world
Mr.Rangan is 🍊 Mirindaaaaaaaaa Man
I like to see an interview with Writer Jeyamohan by BR
why didnt Baddy answer the second question at 0:32... that is by far the biggest issue with this kind of bilingual films!
Yup you gave good analysis
Was this a flop.. I mean not upto its potential financial gains expected? Asking since i haven't kept any track of it.
www.zeebiz.com/india/news-20-box-office-collection-total-rs-600-crore-day-6-robot-sequel-rajinikanth-starrer-super-hit-or-flop-worldwide-what-analyst-says-74409/amp
I think the mix was not great for this film, the ghost aura thing was bollocks, and Endhira Logathu should have been played in between the movie. The characters should have been more fleshed out emotionally and perhaps the camera should have been slicker even when there was no action going on! I felt that the cinematography was like watching every other Tamil film. Only in brief moments did I feel like I was watching a blockbuster.
Niceandveryverypowerfulmovie
Entertainment is very subjective. 2.0 may not worked for you, but it worked so well for many. U don't have to keep on spread your dissapoinment on every video. Or maybe u just want to make some cash by giving controversial opinion..
TheCoomar007 BR has run out of ideas these days, he just has the aim to pull down all these big films
Why can't you take his negative review if it worked for you? Why shouldn't he say how much he disliked a movie, just like he says how much he likes a movie?
@@GuruPrasanna I don't mind if he keep on talking about his hate till the end of time. But to keep on saying his dissapoinment in every video, which is obviously to get more views and squeeze out some cash out of it, I'm my opinion it's a bit unethical. that's all Guru, u don't have to get tense for it, chill..
Some guys were chanting on emotional connect is missing ...fun is missing..??
R u people drunk...??
Even b4 the rls did the state abt there is fun factor in the film???
Its just full in the super new concept with jaw dropping visuals...thats all what they said..and it has a super story too...!!!
Why u ppl bringing unnecessary stuffs into the script?
2D is good to watch
Was eagarly waiting for this... Thank you so much, and please continue like this in English don't switch to Tamil please
U r a reviewer , actually everyone can do that , u too know that, don't think u know everything about filmmaking , if u do , make a film Bharadwaj sir ,😊,
So if you want to criticize Mody you should be a chief minister atleast? Or mp?
@@uhtijmai nope
😂 who said not to criticize
Bollywood is too scared to take risks.
🌟🌟✨✨
Rasaali ah adhu acham enbadhu madamayada song da.....
shriram Hariharan idhulayum Rajali nu oru song iruku
ARR's bgm was irritating at many places, was really disappointed with the blaring bgm at sparrow's death scene that sunk Resul Pookutty's work.
If Shankar sir would have called this whole thing a bluff in the end, it's nothing but a plot created by the mastermind vasi along with pakshi for the double motive (Vasi to bring back Chitti and Pakshi to save birds). Justify that this big scale bluff was required to bring the mobile industry scam to light. BR and other critics would have probably called it smart script/writing just like they did for CCV
When Sujatha was no more he is offset
The Maniratnam lobby always degrades Shankar's movies and finds the lamest faults.And any to which lobby Mr.BR belongs to. BR is the Torch Bearer of Maniratnam lobby
This film is not a dedicated SI-FI.
(Just projected as Si-Fi because of futuristic approach and robots)
Do #AskBr on pithamagan
HON. AKSHAY KUMAR is great actor. I think he is 5 times better than so called SS RAJINI.
2.O - in simple words it’s a
COMIC without LOGIC... whereas BB-2 is a EPIC .
The producers rather would have marketed /projected 2.O , a movie for children...👍🏻
Sridhar Kumar yes jumping from mountain to mountain , carrying a huge lingam in shoulder , flying from palm trees like birds , pulling a huge statue single handedly are all very logical and epic 😏
Flying using palm trees - dumbest scene ever seen
Sachi Siva
Don’t get frustrated... the height of illogical is that matters...
Jesso John
Utilisation of the existing resources....
@@sachisiva489 BB series is promoted as Myth ,fantasy genre .
In fantasy logics are secondary.
....
But in Si-Fi ...logics are primary aspect.
Just watched today.. Absolutely rubbish.. No logic what's so ever.. Akki is wasted.. Bhardwaj talk some sense man
Hahaha me too lost some serious time and money and got too many hate from my friends for dragging them to this crap
what
in fact, I also believe the same thing. BGM completely killed Sound mixing and they also wasted raajali song at the end. what I observed from the movie after observing BGM and Sound mixing is that they just killed the movie. Now it's like watching anime.
2.0 is stupid immature movie And A R Rehman wouldn't taken this movie and U wouldn't taken this stupid movie for review....
It’s high time that BR should stop spreading negativity around 2.0. It looks as if he is being paid from other side ( Tollywood industry ). If the movie is good, u cannot stop it from breaking BB’s all times collection record
The problem is with you and not with many of us. Please don’t put your negative thoughts into our system. You are influencing us and not reviewing. Stop.....Stop......Stop......
What does many of us mean? I did have a lot of problems with the movie too just like what he says and so did most of my friends.
Why are you here? Stop watching and this is not for fan boys. This is for neutral movie lovers
@@MMaheshThakur so if I wish to criticize kohli for playing wrong shot I should have played for national team right? Very good so to criticize politician we need to be atleast a mla 😂 you fan boys of shankar are acting as genius. Go watch train to busan or flu not Hollywood just Asian films see how budget is spent with brain
Firstly you direct a movie then judge other movies.