I have a PhD in Theoretical physics and I enjoy your videos. Not sure what you are doing or planning on doing with your career but you have a great way of explaining things. I will be following for sure.
It's all around the tourus, as is "the outside", then you also can't do anything to change it to the other shapes, because the line will go around the insides of the tourus and come out to the same place it was before.
There is something deeply beautiful in topology, where the shapes defining feature is not as much the area shaping the hole, or any such property that can be expressed as positively being and thus causing the hole to appear. That all can be abstracted away, morphed and scaled, but the hole itself and crucially only the hole survives as defining feature that gives raise to unique characteristics. A negative being, lack of being, is what defines the object or objects that fall under the category. The fact that we humans feel often so keen and connected to something we project as being and notice the lack off, or absence, and that it makes deep and complex sense mathematically, is to me beautiful. After all that is required to even notice a hole: you project something that is not there, and give particular meaning to the lack of it. Else it would be a tunnel; maybe set of low ceiling, walls and floor. There is no definite need to notify the absence or mark it with meaning: all things lack almost everything. Yet we gravitate towards negations and not only give them meaning but define and assign meaning to whole things based on what negations they include.
I just realised why odd dimensional shapes have Euler characteristic 2 and even dimensional shapes have Euler characteristic 0. Because each shape also has 1 of itself and 1 null set (negative 1 dimensional thing). This makes all Euler characteristics 0 (without holes).
"...and VIOLA!" It is "VOILA!", actually. what is funny is the part where I have been typing it as "VIOLA!" for ages, awaiting someone anywhere to speak it this way. Thank You! PS. Thanks for this with YOULER! I was let go as an Apprentice at a recording studio here in Seattle, the one by the Neptune theatre in the 'U' district, where Heart recorded their first release, for speaking it as NEWMAN for the NOYMAN microphones. 🍕
Just sen this channel. That was excellent. That was by miles the best explanation of a very difficult topic that I have ever seen. Excellent delivery too. I don’t understand the maths involved in topology but now I at least understand what the Poincaré conjecture was all about. Brilliant thanks.
That's the first time I've been told, why he rejected the price. Up until now I liked to believe that he valued math so much higher than anything else that he could simply not see the necessity of having a million dollars...
In 2010 Gregory Perelman proved that we live in 4-D Universe ( X^2+Y^2+Z^2+t^2=1). Now he is working on the problem of " Holes ". Possibly, will prove how this Universe was born.
By far the BEST exposition I've yet seen on The P.C., Topology & Ricci Flow! I've 2 Math Degrees & was able to follow quite easily & enjoyably...LOL U deserve more views & subscribers my young, versatle friend! Keep up the excellent work indeed...
Let me echo what others have said. This video is so very excellent for explaining and making accessible a complex and difficult and abstract topic. The creator and host of this video is a gifted teacher and orator. So glad I found this video. Adding it to my playlist for future reference!
Excellent job buddy. I love the way you explained. The no. of views on your videos shows that very few viewers are interested in such specialized topics. I wish more people get motivated to take up advanced mathematics.
I disagree with your conclusion. The number of viewers is primarily determined by the algorithmic shuffling of these videos, not the number who would enjoy if such videos were presented in their intray, as happened to me. Just saying.
Awesome video, but little bit more info on Perelman solution would have been great 🙏 One of the finest and apt explanation on the problem statement BTW.
The other way is all around the tourus in a horizontal line. The first shape is a square, right? The second is a "ring" that circles the tourus like a ring circles a finger in a sort of vertical way and it can move around horizontally. The third is a straight line going all around the tourus, in a sort of horizontal way, and connecting it around it. You can then go around vertically, reaching the inside of the tourus. You can never make that line become the other two shapes.
Hey, i love the content of your videos! You deserve much more attention. Only thing that makes it sometimes hard to unterstand and fallow is your accent. I know that is hard to change. I am from Germany so my accent isnt perfect neither. You can use an app called Elsa Speak to exercise your accent, it uses AI and is very good. I know this may sound stupid to you because you are probably a native speaker but it could help grow your channel a lot.
Thanks for the tips! This is not my normal accent, it's one that I'm putting on by popular demand. Hopefully as I get more used to speaking in a more Americanized accent (I'm also getting a new mic, so the entirety of the audio will eventually improve) the issue gets sorted. Meanwhile I've put subtitles on the video.
I am a student in this subject and my research interest is in low dimension topology. You made it good but one thing I want to say that if you were bit slow it would be better..
I have a PhD in Theoretical physics and I enjoy your videos. Not sure what you are doing or planning on doing with your career but you have a great way of explaining things. I will be following for sure.
Robert , Have you ever heard of Phase Field theory?
I’m getting my PhD in theoretical physics and I agree with this. There’s a desperate need for those who can explain concepts well
Phd = Pure Heart Divided ymonkeys ;)
"I'll leave that one for you to figure out for yourself"
You have wildly over-estimated me, sir!
Video version of "left as an exercise for the reader".
It's all around the tourus, as is "the outside", then you also can't do anything to change it to the other shapes, because the line will go around the insides of the tourus and come out to the same place it was before.
@@Lufernaal thank you!
@@Lufernaal couldn't the same be said if you put it "inside" the hole?
@@roman111117 they're both equivalent, I think
This channel deserves so many more views and subscribers! Great content!
Glad you think so!
I am currently a high school senior taking taking AP Calc BC. I plan on being a math major and it’s videos like yours that motivate me every day
To shut yourself away and focus on something until you solve it, that's dedication.
There is something deeply beautiful in topology, where the shapes defining feature is not as much the area shaping the hole, or any such property that can be expressed as positively being and thus causing the hole to appear. That all can be abstracted away, morphed and scaled, but the hole itself and crucially only the hole survives as defining feature that gives raise to unique characteristics. A negative being, lack of being, is what defines the object or objects that fall under the category.
The fact that we humans feel often so keen and connected to something we project as being and notice the lack off, or absence, and that it makes deep and complex sense mathematically, is to me beautiful. After all that is required to even notice a hole: you project something that is not there, and give particular meaning to the lack of it. Else it would be a tunnel; maybe set of low ceiling, walls and floor. There is no definite need to notify the absence or mark it with meaning: all things lack almost everything. Yet we gravitate towards negations and not only give them meaning but define and assign meaning to whole things based on what negations they include.
What a beautiful comment
You make me sick
Where do you hide your red sashes Ringo
Detestable thuggie strawdog pontoon
I just realised why odd dimensional shapes have Euler characteristic 2 and even dimensional shapes have Euler characteristic 0. Because each shape also has 1 of itself and 1 null set (negative 1 dimensional thing). This makes all Euler characteristics 0 (without holes).
"...and VIOLA!"
It is "VOILA!", actually.
what is funny is the part where I have been typing it as "VIOLA!" for ages, awaiting someone anywhere to speak it this way.
Thank You!
PS. Thanks for this with YOULER!
I was let go as an Apprentice at a recording studio here in Seattle, the one by the Neptune theatre in the 'U' district, where Heart recorded their first release, for speaking it as NEWMAN for the NOYMAN microphones.
🍕
Just sen this channel. That was excellent. That was by miles the best explanation of a very difficult topic that I have ever seen. Excellent delivery too. I don’t understand the maths involved in topology but now I at least understand what the Poincaré conjecture was all about. Brilliant thanks.
One of the best, clearest videos on any topic, let alone maths or topology. So nice I watched it twice!
That's the first time I've been told, why he rejected the price. Up until now I liked to believe that he valued math so much higher than anything else that he could simply not see the necessity of having a million dollars...
The quality of your videos are amazing man!
I appreciate that!
Excellent vid!
Beautifully well done explanations and top-notch quality!
This is great! Thank you for giving me at least an intuitive notion of what Ricci flow is!
In 2010 Gregory Perelman proved that we live in 4-D Universe ( X^2+Y^2+Z^2+t^2=1). Now he is working on the problem of " Holes ". Possibly, will prove how this Universe was born.
He quit math
well i am a biology student and came here just out of curiosity and i was awestruck by the way you explained it .. SUBSCRIBED
This channel is so underrated ❤
By far the BEST exposition I've yet seen on The P.C., Topology & Ricci Flow!
I've 2 Math Degrees & was able to follow quite easily & enjoyably...LOL
U deserve more views & subscribers my young, versatle friend!
Keep up the excellent work indeed...
Can I request a video on P vs Np particularly if P = NP with a fairly practical algorithm to solve NP problem in practical times?
I never made it past high school Trig, and I am able to follow along with you. You are an excellent communicator.
I am surprised this doesn't have more views. Great video!
3:00 what's the tune name, btw liked the video 👍, make one on yang miller's and reimann too
The best video I’ve seen on this abstruse proof, well done. You are talented at this!
Let me echo what others have said. This video is so very excellent for explaining and making accessible a complex and difficult and abstract topic. The creator and host of this video is a gifted teacher and orator. So glad I found this video. Adding it to my playlist for future reference!
Excellent job buddy. I love the way you explained. The no. of views on your videos shows that very few viewers are interested in such specialized topics. I wish more people get motivated to take up advanced mathematics.
I disagree with your conclusion. The number of viewers is primarily determined by the algorithmic shuffling of these videos, not the number who would enjoy if such videos were presented in their intray, as happened to me. Just saying.
Bhai bhai!
People like you make indians proud!
Great to see more videos, keep it up!
The third path on the torus is where you draw it on top and encircling the hole, right?
inb4 10k subs for the people who are coming from 1 mil! This channel is going places fs
Awesome video, but little bit more info on Perelman solution would have been great 🙏
One of the finest and apt explanation on the problem statement BTW.
Noted. Thanks!
The other way is all around the tourus in a horizontal line. The first shape is a square, right? The second is a "ring" that circles the tourus like a ring circles a finger in a sort of vertical way and it can move around horizontally. The third is a straight line going all around the tourus, in a sort of horizontal way, and connecting it around it. You can then go around vertically, reaching the inside of the tourus. You can never make that line become the other two shapes.
Brilliant content with smooth explanation ! Please keep it up.
Thanks a lot!
Brilliant mann just keep going RUclips takes some time to reach you to the people who actually loves it... Don't stop keep going ❤️
Your animations are so beautiful ! What softwares do you use to make them ?
Normally Adobe After Effects, but there's a couple of 3D effects in this video which I used C4D to make.
You are a very gifted teacher indeed
Rad! Best explanation on RUclips bar-none.
Wonderful visuals. What a superb video.
Math truly has no limits
Great piece of work, nice job
This was really well done! Kudos to you man!
Your videos are amazing 👍👍
Glad you like them!
Great video
Great explanation
Very nice job my friend...
Glad you liked it!
my guess for the 3rd unique type of loop on the surfuse of a turso is a circle around the girth of the shape.
Smale came *before* Stallings, not after - but their work was independent of each other.
11:18 - Is it a spiralling looping line across the torus? Turns it into a slinky
Hey, i love the content of your videos! You deserve much more attention. Only thing that makes it sometimes hard to unterstand and fallow is your accent. I know that is hard to change. I am from Germany so my accent isnt perfect neither. You can use an app called Elsa Speak to exercise your accent, it uses AI and is very good. I know this may sound stupid to you because you are probably a native speaker but it could help grow your channel a lot.
Thanks for the tips! This is not my normal accent, it's one that I'm putting on by popular demand. Hopefully as I get more used to speaking in a more Americanized accent (I'm also getting a new mic, so the entirety of the audio will eventually improve) the issue gets sorted. Meanwhile I've put subtitles on the video.
great analogy
I really like your videos, keep it up
Oh my god you explained it so well, thank you!
I am a student in this subject and my research interest is in low dimension topology. You made it good but one thing I want to say that if you were bit slow it would be better..
What’s the third way to draw the line around the thing???? I’m going insane I can’t figure it out
Great content .. What are u doing brother ???
great work....
You are so genius💖
Is a manifold the set of points
(x,y) €R^n*R such that y=f(x) with f being differentiable and with a non zero jacobian?
Great job btw, keep it up!
Good stuff...
The million dollar price has been used to finance the Poincaré Chair for young, promising mathematicians.
Wonderful!
Glad you think so!
I still did not get why the man rejected the prize? What was his reason?
Best EXPLAINed
man
Thank you
Really good
My one year old can make a spherical shape out of a doughnut shape. No problem.
Waooo keep it going 🙌
cool channel
I see you were interested in the poincaré conjecture
And here I thought topology was the same as topography
Please bhaiya, make a playlist on topology and string theory... Please please please accept my request 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Where do you go to college
Still waiting on a video to explain this properly...let's see how yours fares....it's really not that complex, just needs to be explained visually
Second video, aaand subbed.
Did you make a massive error? [look at the frames between 1:39 and 1:50]
CUT CUT CUT CUT CUT
13:50 - So they did what most mathematicians do when they do when they can't solve something: Make a prize for someone else to do it.
👍
Great content, but mediocre minds will never catch it .That's why few subscribers and less views.
cool
"Vanilla circle"
Fetish language. Interesting.
бля я извиняюсь, но меня прорвало, как же сложно объяснить кому то , что 3d сфера это двумерный объект... это походу просто за гранью интеллекта
Your explanation is very good but background music is very distracting
You are doing anything original or just cut copy and paste
Hamilton lost!, Perelann won! Why cannot Hamilton relise his loss?
A PERFECT WOMAN.
Speak s l o w e r , t h a n k s
dont call me homo😡
Ohhhhh, so Trump was just doing topology! 8:23