Before acting story will be shared. Pavitra had agreed to the storyline but later on didn't want act. She was already with Darshan by that time. Maybe she felt comfortable with Darshan's company than acting. Maybe she was smitten by Darshan and his generosity. If anyone wants to act in movies they have to shed inhibitions. That's the reality. No place for emotions, it should be under control. Director is sharing hardship she faced with Pavitra. That's it.
@@sumanahebbar1528 Ok, she may have realised it afterwards. It is not a SIN or CRIME. Why the director is expressing it now or why it is being related to her character? Listening to story line is one thing and doing it practically is another thing. Why should someone else go that much deeper into her personal life on the professional platforn. If she was comfortable with Mr.Darshan or some other, it does not matter. The director has all the right to claim the monetary loss if there are any agreement signed. That is all. ಹೀಗೆ ಅವರ ಬಗೆಗೆ ಎಲ್ಲವನ್ನೂ ಹೆಕ್ಕಿ, ಹೆಕ್ಕಿ ತಪ್ಪು ಹುಡುಕುತ್ತಾ ಹೋದರೆ ಕನ್ನಡದ ಗಾದೆ, " " ಕೈಗೆ ಎಟುಕದ ದ್ರಾಕ್ಷಿ ಹುಳಿ" ಎಂದ ಹಾಗೆ ಆಗುತ್ತದೆ.
@@nagaveninv When someone does something wrong - some support, some criticise, some ignore etc. What you have to understand is " the accused past will be srutinized, dissected inch by inch" whether you like it or not. Director alone is not to be blamed, media is also gross.
@@sumanahebbar1528 Yes, let it be done legally. I am not criticizing the director. She is expressing her experience with someone. As she has been interviewed she has shared her experience. My objection is the tone, the assessment, negative assessment, finding fault with whatever she was or did, relating everything with the present case, an attempt to "JUDGE"an attempt to "BRAND" is not acceptable. Was it wrong to be born in a middle/ poor class family, was it wrong to love a person and get married, was it wrong to be divorced when something went wrong? Was it wrong for a woman to make an attempt become financially independent? Was it wrong for a woman to choose or change her profession and have her own priorities? What can be called wrong is her interference in the life of a married person and the sequential problems, which is purely personal and both are answerable. My objection to those whoever is making an attempt to abuse someone who has no concern in their lives.
Why should somebody share about their personal life when they are there for the job? Persons age, current salary, personal life details are irrelevant for any kind of job. You are trying to get mileage out of current situation those individuals are facing.
She doesn't need to prove. Pavithra gowda herself showing herself what type of woman she is. Being with married man & expecting him to leave his son& wife for her
@@sunilkumarj2499 ನಾಚಿಕೆ ಆಗಲ್ವಾ, ಅವಳು ಅಲ್ಲಿ ಮುಟ್ಟಿಸಿ ಕೊಳ್ಳಲಿಲ್ಲ, ತೊಡೆ ಮೇಲೆ ಕೈ ಹಾಕಿಸಿ ಕೊಳ್ಳಲಿಲ್ಲ, ಬಟ್ಟೆ ನಾವು ಹೇಳಿದ ಕಡೆ cgange ಮಾಡಲಿಲ್ಲ, attitude ಜಾಸ್ತಿ, ಇತ್ಯಾದಿ, ಇತ್ಯಾದಿ ಹೇಳ್ತಾ ಇದ್ರೆ ಅದನ್ನು ಕೇಳಿಸಿಕೊಂಡು, ಇನ್ನೂ, ಇನ್ನೂ ಕೆದಕಿ ಕೆದಕಿ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ ಕೇಳ್ತಾ ಇರೋದು ಯಾವ ರೀತಿಯ ವರದಿ? ಹೆಣ್ಣು ಮಕ್ಕಳ ಬಗೆಗೆ ಈ ರೀತಿಯ ತೇಜೋವಧೆ ವರದಿ ಮಾಡಲು ನಿಮಗೆಲ್ಲ ಅನುಮತಿ ನೀಡಿದವರು ಯಾರು? ಯಾರೋ ಯಾರನ್ನೋ ಇಟ್ಕೊಂಡರೆ, ಕಟ್ಕೊಂಡರೆ ನನಗೆ, ನಿನಗೆ ಏನಾಗ ಬೇಕು? ನಿನ್ ಮನೆ ವಿಷಯಕ್ಕೆ ತಲೆ ಕೆಡಿಸಿಕೊ. ಬೇರೆಯವರ ಹೆಣ್ಣು ಮಕ್ಕಳ ಬಗೆಗೆ ತೇಜೋವಧೆ ಮಾಡಿದರೆ ನಾಳೆ ಮಾಡಿದವರಿಗೂ ವಾಪಸ್ ಬರುತ್ತೆ.. "ಕರ್ಮ returns"!! ಇಟ್ಕೊಂಡವರಿಗೆ ಕಟ್ಕೊಂಡವರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ನೆನಪಿರಲಿಲ್ಲವಾ!! ಪಾಪ!!
Edila vishaya beka,nimge pavitra gowda darshan vishaya dodda news agide,director gu yenu kelsa ella
ಗೌಡರು ಮಾತ್ರ ಇವರಿಗೆ interview ಮಾಡಿ
Edella vishyna
Thappenu? Nimgyaak bejaaru?
Alla ivru innond channel nalli bere helidare illi bere heltha idare
ನಿಮಗೆ ಎಷ್ಟು ನಷ್ಟ ಮಾಡಿ ಹೊಗಿದ್ದಾರೆ ಹೇಳಿ ಪವಿತ್ರ ಗೌಡ ಗೆ ಕರೆದು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಇಬ್ಬರನ್ನೂ ಕೇಳೋಣ 5:30
Dear news channel why so much build up for Pavitra Gowda...
You want the actresses to perform freely, withou objections for any kind of touch, exposure, etc., and if they dislike it they are not good!
Before acting story will be shared. Pavitra had agreed to the storyline but later on didn't want act. She was already with Darshan by that time. Maybe she felt comfortable with Darshan's company than acting. Maybe she was smitten by Darshan and his generosity.
If anyone wants to act in movies they have to shed inhibitions. That's the reality. No place for emotions, it should be under control.
Director is sharing hardship she faced with Pavitra. That's it.
@@sumanahebbar1528 Ok, she may have realised it afterwards. It is not a SIN or CRIME.
Why the director is expressing it now or why it is being related to her character?
Listening to story line is one thing and doing it practically is another thing.
Why should someone else go that much deeper into her personal life on the professional platforn. If she was comfortable with Mr.Darshan or some other, it does not matter.
The director has all the right to claim the monetary loss if there are any agreement signed. That is all.
ಹೀಗೆ ಅವರ ಬಗೆಗೆ ಎಲ್ಲವನ್ನೂ ಹೆಕ್ಕಿ, ಹೆಕ್ಕಿ ತಪ್ಪು ಹುಡುಕುತ್ತಾ ಹೋದರೆ ಕನ್ನಡದ ಗಾದೆ, " " ಕೈಗೆ ಎಟುಕದ ದ್ರಾಕ್ಷಿ ಹುಳಿ" ಎಂದ ಹಾಗೆ ಆಗುತ್ತದೆ.
@@nagaveninv When someone does something wrong - some support, some criticise, some ignore etc.
What you have to understand is " the accused past will be srutinized, dissected inch by inch" whether you like it or not.
Director alone is not to be blamed, media is also gross.
@@sumanahebbar1528 Yes, let it be done legally.
I am not criticizing the director. She is expressing her experience with someone. As she has been interviewed she has shared her experience.
My objection is the tone, the assessment, negative assessment, finding fault with whatever she was or did, relating everything with the present case, an attempt to "JUDGE"an attempt to "BRAND" is not acceptable.
Was it wrong to be born in a middle/ poor class family, was it wrong to love a person and get married, was it wrong to be divorced when something went wrong? Was it wrong for a woman to make an attempt become financially independent? Was it wrong for a woman to choose or change her profession and have her own priorities?
What can be called wrong is her interference in the life of a married person and the sequential problems, which is purely personal and both are answerable.
My objection to those whoever is making an attempt to abuse someone who has no concern in their lives.
Why should somebody share about their personal life when they are there for the job? Persons age, current salary, personal life details are irrelevant for any kind of job.
You are trying to get mileage out of current situation those individuals are facing.
Good job by Pavithra Gowda.
Are you crazy to speak on her? Is she worthy of it. Do some useful things.
E yamma ondevishya hidkondu adanne elitale e yamma
Magalidtu cinema ge bekalla glamour beauty avalalittu innenu
ಹುಡುಗಿ ಅಲ್ಲ,ಹೆಂಗಸು
Totally you want to prove Pavithra Gowda is a lady of bad character.
Nim husband jote bere yaaraadru girl relation ittkondru ide tara support madteera madam?
She doesn't need to prove. Pavithra gowda herself showing herself what type of woman she is. Being with married man & expecting him to leave his son& wife for her
Nin gandan nu etkolake hellu pavitra gae
@@sunilkumarj2499 ಕಳಿಸು, ನೋಡೋಣ. ಮೊದಲು ಕನ್ನಡ ಕಲಿ
@@sunilkumarj2499 ನಾಚಿಕೆ ಆಗಲ್ವಾ, ಅವಳು ಅಲ್ಲಿ ಮುಟ್ಟಿಸಿ ಕೊಳ್ಳಲಿಲ್ಲ, ತೊಡೆ ಮೇಲೆ ಕೈ ಹಾಕಿಸಿ ಕೊಳ್ಳಲಿಲ್ಲ, ಬಟ್ಟೆ ನಾವು ಹೇಳಿದ ಕಡೆ cgange ಮಾಡಲಿಲ್ಲ, attitude ಜಾಸ್ತಿ, ಇತ್ಯಾದಿ, ಇತ್ಯಾದಿ ಹೇಳ್ತಾ ಇದ್ರೆ ಅದನ್ನು ಕೇಳಿಸಿಕೊಂಡು, ಇನ್ನೂ, ಇನ್ನೂ ಕೆದಕಿ ಕೆದಕಿ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ ಕೇಳ್ತಾ ಇರೋದು ಯಾವ ರೀತಿಯ ವರದಿ? ಹೆಣ್ಣು ಮಕ್ಕಳ ಬಗೆಗೆ ಈ ರೀತಿಯ ತೇಜೋವಧೆ ವರದಿ ಮಾಡಲು ನಿಮಗೆಲ್ಲ ಅನುಮತಿ ನೀಡಿದವರು ಯಾರು?
ಯಾರೋ ಯಾರನ್ನೋ ಇಟ್ಕೊಂಡರೆ, ಕಟ್ಕೊಂಡರೆ ನನಗೆ, ನಿನಗೆ ಏನಾಗ ಬೇಕು? ನಿನ್ ಮನೆ ವಿಷಯಕ್ಕೆ ತಲೆ ಕೆಡಿಸಿಕೊ. ಬೇರೆಯವರ ಹೆಣ್ಣು ಮಕ್ಕಳ ಬಗೆಗೆ ತೇಜೋವಧೆ ಮಾಡಿದರೆ ನಾಳೆ ಮಾಡಿದವರಿಗೂ ವಾಪಸ್ ಬರುತ್ತೆ.. "ಕರ್ಮ returns"!!
ಇಟ್ಕೊಂಡವರಿಗೆ ಕಟ್ಕೊಂಡವರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ನೆನಪಿರಲಿಲ್ಲವಾ!! ಪಾಪ!!