I wouldn't call her a demon rat, but I think when you are applying for such high level of office you should take your job seriously and come prepared, especially for a high stakes interview like that one.
@CJ P. Nope rewatch her hearing, you can see that she didnt answer many questions and she def didnt get that question correct. If thats fake news the whole hearing is fake
@UCbHLaDtV7PycPu8hNe0CBdQ 1st off, im not even a math major and I can recite the quadratic formula. My little siblings can tell you the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment as well.. 2nd, if you truly watched the hearing she basically answered nothing.... I gave one example of why she should have notes, you want more examples?
@@davidwong1091 Grow up dude. If you think this woman finished #1 in her class at an Elite Law School, without knowing her stuff, then you may want to reconsider who you're calling dumb. That question, is like asking a Field's Medal candidate to recite the Quadratic Formula. You'll notice everyone in the room laughed about it, including the Dems who were in the midst of spending 3 consecutive days trying to trip her up. If this woman is deemed to be unfit to serve as a Supreme Court Justice, I assure you, her ability recite the Bill of Rights from memory, will have nothing to do with it. This woman's Academic Credentials are unimpeachable.
@@nietz009 No it is not. Its like asking a kindergarten math teacher to recite the quadratic formula, which btw even I can do as a non math major. You have to remember she graduated in a time where things were easier, i would like to see her do that now. Yeah everyone laughed bc they all know she isnt qualified. If you're so grown up why do you still use the term ganster like that? Oh i guess you arent.
@@davidwong1091 Amy landed 4 out of 5 freedoms, which is good. Ironic that she missed protest because the protests these days looking more like looting and riots.
@@evelyngreen529 Protest from both sides tbh. If anything looters go to protest just to loot and the riots I have seen seems to have started with police confrontation or other side confronting the other, such a mess.
@@rawn4203Yeah and then you watch all her videos and you realize she’s forgotten more than you’ll ever know about the United States Constitution, federalism and federal law.
She needed no notes cause she wasn't planning on answering many questions and frankly didn't need to. Just give the runaround on how she can't have a prior opinion on any matters. We all know the agenda so this was just a waste of everyone's time!
@@EbutEm right, why write notes on how much of a partisan, unqualified shill she is. she knows how much this is a disastrous circus and she will be seen as a tool placed there by a bunch of unpatriotic idiots
I want this woman in the SCOTUS! That move right there just boosted her credibility AND her character to such a genuine level. Not to mention witty! 😊 AHH she's just what we need!!!!
That is priceless. What she is saying is, the only written reminder she needs is that she is sitting in a hearing conducted by the U.S. Senate. I think that message flew right over the heads of most of them, lol! That look on her face tells me he didn't get it either. This woman is a hell of a lot sharper than most of these "senators" realize, or even are, themselves, and that answer, alone, should earn her the position!
@M M what she held up was their monogrammed notepad, which they apparently needed the reminder for themselves......and she pointed that out. Everything she needs is in her head, which she also made painfully clear to them.
This is exactly who you want in a judge, regardless of where you stand on the political aisle. Poised, respectful, and stands by the constitution! We'd be lucky to have her on the court!
Political views should not be heavily factored into the decision of a supreme court justice. A justice is supposed to have a nonpartisan stance, which is important for a fair trial. Amy Coney Barrett is not impartial; although, she fakes it right now by saying "I cannot answer that question", it will become very apparent on November 3rd that she was not a good choice.
@@Cliff2024 Somehow, I’m not surprised that you don’t understand. You asked me, so I told you: She’s a highly-accredited academic, legal scholar, United States federal judge, and a lawyer with stellar professional credentials and reputation.
8hrs of questions on law answered everyone with ease, remembered who, why, what the case was and if a detail the democrats tried to mischaracterize she knew the context and where they got it wrong, they looked down at notes and did not correct her.... 100000+ Level BOSS
@ Just saying this shows her arrogance and people don't bring up the fact that she didnt really answer anything and incorrectly answer quite a few things? Just looks to me you and a bunch of people didnt even wait it.
3 года назад
@@davidwong1091 oh, alright. Ginsberg rule only applies when it's convenient. Got it. 👌🏽
@ Nope you're assuming. Like how everyone likes to assume if you disagree with a republican then you must be a democrat pffft.
3 года назад+1
@@davidwong1091 Please show me were I assumed you were a Democrat. Seems like projection to me, as you've obviously assumed that and also that I'm a Republican. Me pointing out a rule that both sides of the aisle agreed on has no basis in me assuming you're of any party. Any good and normal person would agree that we should follow the rules that have been set forth. Why should the rules change for ACB? You have some real digging to do, you have a bias that you're ignoring and until you want to be honest with yourself it is impossible for us to have a honest conversation with each other.. darling.
i am tired seeing the useless senators trashing each other for nothing. I wish they all go to the farm plant some trees with judge Berrett, at the end of the day she will be approved (not matter what these democrats trying) and we got some trees for the future.
I think most of us are just tired of repeating the same thing to conservatives like yourself who will disregard any valid argument we make and will rebut it by only saying "Trump 2020".
That is really impress everybody ! She is library herself of Law ! So no one of Democrat can hurt her !!! We American people can understand and see what she has been through from the day 1 .... God bless you Amy and your family ! God bless us America !
I remember when Justice Roberts was exactly in this situation, he was the smartest dude in the room, he knew the what, when, where and who in all of his cases, democrats couldnt put a dent on him... too bad roberts turned liberal on us, many say the corrupt FBI and oboma have some dirt on him... I believe it.
You know what amazes me? All comments here, from people who actually watched her and listened to her, are not bad comments. I mean, people who actually took their time and listened to what she has to say. All the hate comes from the very fact that she was nominated by Donald Trump. I am sure if more people heard her they would definitely change their mind God bless her heart
@@matta8569 lmao if a broom was in the election against Trump I’d vote for the broom. People are tired of a narcissist nut case running our country. The biggest pos joke to this country.
@@skylinez4793 Leave the brooms alone you perv lol He gets done what we want him to get done, and he's sooo good at trolling & triggering you pricks.. that alone buy's him my vote. Don't worry you'll get your first woman prez in 2024 when Ivanka takes over ;)
God, she so effing cool!!! In all seriousness, she's a good fit. She may not exactly have that much experience, however she's shown that she has the intelligence to be an excellent supreme court justice.
"If you tell the truth, you don't have remember anything." --Mark Twain
@Anthony Lopez Ahhh always good to hear from the compassionate left! 😂
I wouldn't call her a demon rat, but I think when you are applying for such high level of office you should take your job seriously and come prepared, especially for a high stakes interview like that one.
@Cameron True...the Clintons have mastered the art of effective lying lol
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment...
@CJ P. Nope rewatch her hearing, you can see that she didnt answer many questions and she def didnt get that question correct. If thats fake news the whole hearing is fake
She could very well be the smartest person in the room.
It's the Senate, most of them are 70+ and half asleep lol she's definitely the smartest person in the room.
Smartest person in the room believes men can rise from the dead
@@kevinpurnell9465 - which is confirmation
I think she IS the smartest person in the Room!!
@@kevinpurnell9465 In the medical field its happened numerous times.
That was a pretty gangster move right there.
It sure was..somebody needs to make a "Thug Life" meme for that..she IS awesome 😁
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment... If that means gangsta to be dumb
@UCbHLaDtV7PycPu8hNe0CBdQ 1st off, im not even a math major and I can recite the quadratic formula. My little siblings can tell you the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment as well.. 2nd, if you truly watched the hearing she basically answered nothing.... I gave one example of why she should have notes, you want more examples?
@@davidwong1091 Grow up dude. If you think this woman finished #1 in her class at an Elite Law School, without knowing her stuff, then you may want to reconsider who you're calling dumb. That question, is like asking a Field's Medal candidate to recite the Quadratic Formula. You'll notice everyone in the room laughed about it, including the Dems who were in the midst of spending 3 consecutive days trying to trip her up.
If this woman is deemed to be unfit to serve as a Supreme Court Justice, I assure you, her ability recite the Bill of Rights from memory, will have nothing to do with it. This woman's Academic Credentials are unimpeachable.
@@nietz009 No it is not. Its like asking a kindergarten math teacher to recite the quadratic formula, which btw even I can do as a non math major. You have to remember she graduated in a time where things were easier, i would like to see her do that now. Yeah everyone laughed bc they all know she isnt qualified. If you're so grown up why do you still use the term ganster like that? Oh i guess you arent.
You want a woman to be president? Vote for a chick like this... not Hilary and not Harris.
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
But they don't run just weirdos
@@davidwong1091 shit dude maybe you should have been picked for scotus
@@davidwong1091 Amy landed 4 out of 5 freedoms, which is good. Ironic that she missed protest because the protests these days looking more like looting and riots.
@@evelyngreen529 Protest from both sides tbh. If anything looters go to protest just to loot and the riots I have seen seems to have started with police confrontation or other side confronting the other, such a mess.
Let's just make that woman President.
Yeah let's not. She's too corrupt
After trump of course.
@@fildfsx lol what
@@fildfsx lol how is she corrupt?
@@fildfsx too much soy?
Meanwhile, Biden can’t say his name without a teleprompter
Yosemite
'I'm Joe Biden, and I forgot this message.' -Joe Biden
He still thinks he's running for Senate.. he literally said that AGAIN at his last 'drive-in rally'... aka 3 cars and dementia patient.
Fake news
@@Bob.in.cognito nah, just a joke. Not far off though lmao
"That's impr-that's impressive."
Most honest take I think I've heard in a deposition.
Very very appropriate candidate for our highest court!!!
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
@@davidwong1091 Smells like corona in here..is that CHYNA???
@@nerino_chan So funny! Make more of that joke at your workplace.
Call him Mr small wong
@@VidWiz Hmmm guess the republican party is the most racist party.
This goes in top 5 thug life political moments
Nothing will EVER beat you'd be in jail
I am inclined to agree with that one
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment...
@Turnabout Turnip Looks like he stfu. xD
Nikki haleys un speech is definitely another of them XD
I would be afraid to be her child. Mom remembers EVERYTHING.
Amy Coney Barret doesn't need notes: The notes need Amy Coney Barret
No she needed the notes
Sounds like a chuck norris joke
Guess you never saw the clip where couldnt name all 5 freedoms proctected under the first amendment.
@@popoffpepparclearly she didn’t, slugger.
@@rawn4203Yeah and then you watch all her videos and you realize she’s forgotten more than you’ll ever know about the United States Constitution, federalism and federal law.
When you’re telling the truth, no notes needed!!!!
She needed no notes cause she wasn't planning on answering many questions and frankly didn't need to. Just give the runaround on how she can't have a prior opinion on any matters. We all know the agenda so this was just a waste of everyone's time!
@@EbutEm right, why write notes on how much of a partisan, unqualified shill she is. she knows how much this is a disastrous circus and she will be seen as a tool placed there by a bunch of unpatriotic idiots
I see the trolls are out , guess they're mad cause they can't push the nominee is a rapist angle
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
I want this woman in the SCOTUS! That move right there just boosted her credibility AND her character to such a genuine level. Not to mention witty! 😊 AHH she's just what we need!!!!
Got her!
No one needed a homophobe
@@popoffpeppar When you Leftists can't come up with legit criticism, you accuse someone of some "phobia".
multiple notebooks, books, what do you have? nothing, I actually know what I'm talking about.
provinylmusic ,yes, the only one in this assembly.
That is priceless. What she is saying is, the only written reminder she needs is that she is sitting in a hearing conducted by the U.S. Senate. I think that message flew right over the heads of most of them, lol! That look on her face tells me he didn't get it either. This woman is a hell of a lot sharper than most of these "senators" realize, or even are, themselves, and that answer, alone, should earn her the position!
She's playing 4-D Chess and these dem's are struggling with checkers
@M M No more than I need a reminder that I am responding to someone trolling my comment on YT. You figure it out
@M M what she held up was their monogrammed notepad, which they apparently needed the reminder for themselves......and she pointed that out.
Everything she needs is in her head, which she also made painfully clear to them.
The best part to me, is that she's actually a little embarrassed to show that she doesn't need notes.
This is exactly who you want in a judge, regardless of where you stand on the political aisle. Poised, respectful, and stands by the constitution! We'd be lucky to have her on the court!
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
Political views should not be heavily factored into the decision of a supreme court justice. A justice is supposed to have a nonpartisan stance, which is important for a fair trial. Amy Coney Barrett is not impartial; although, she fakes it right now by saying "I cannot answer that question", it will become very apparent on November 3rd that she was not a good choice.
Democrats: She’s obviously TOO qualified, TOO knowledgeable and TOO accomplished to be on the supreme court! She should be ashamed of herself.
Wonder what credentials she had to go through with Spanky for him to pick her??
@@Cliff2024 She’s a law professor.
@@whiskeytangofoxtrot2568 And I flew the space shuttle around the sun 3 times. What's your point?
@@Cliff2024 Somehow, I’m not surprised that you don’t understand. You asked me, so I told you: She’s a highly-accredited academic, legal scholar, United States federal judge, and a lawyer with stellar professional credentials and reputation.
@Anthony Lopez Thanks, Anthony, but no need to insult trolls by comparing them to this guy.
8hrs of questions on law answered everyone with ease, remembered who, why, what the case was and if a detail the democrats tried to mischaracterize she knew the context and where they got it wrong, they looked down at notes and did not correct her.... 100000+ Level BOSS
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment...
So she doesn't have a "book of lies"....
TheJagjr4450 You are so right!
I’m attracted to intelligent, strong women. And she is both intelligent, strong AND courageous.
Ok so she should be on the court because you're attracted to her? WTF. Doesn't mean she's the most qualified for the job.
Not to mention beautiful. 😍
@@mistym0rning typical lefty
@@mistym0rning Go back to Gender & Race Theory
@@mistym0rning i don’t think you realize how stupid this comment is
They are pissed that she is the smartest by far in the room..
It took Ruth Bader Ginsburg 1,000 years to become RBG.
Amy Coney Barrett is already ACB.
Is that supposed to be some kind of accomplishment?
lol.. recognition!
No notes just truth, straight from memory and conviction. P.s taking notes isn't bad, but she's badass
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
@ Just saying this shows her arrogance and people don't bring up the fact that she didnt really answer anything and incorrectly answer quite a few things? Just looks to me you and a bunch of people didnt even wait it.
@@davidwong1091 oh, alright. Ginsberg rule only applies when it's convenient. Got it. 👌🏽
@ Nope you're assuming. Like how everyone likes to assume if you disagree with a republican then you must be a democrat pffft.
@@davidwong1091 Please show me were I assumed you were a Democrat. Seems like projection to me, as you've obviously assumed that and also that I'm a Republican. Me pointing out a rule that both sides of the aisle agreed on has no basis in me assuming you're of any party. Any good and normal person would agree that we should follow the rules that have been set forth. Why should the rules change for ACB? You have some real digging to do, you have a bias that you're ignoring and until you want to be honest with yourself it is impossible for us to have a honest conversation with each other.. darling.
Boss!
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
Of the deplorable federalist society, yes.
savage
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
BAM!!! LOL
In order to take notes, something must be said that is noteworthy. It is the freaking senate, nothing said to her is worth jotting down Jesus.
Hahahahahaha, that’s so funny!
“ACA vs ACB”
Have a great day to y’all!
Everyone: We use notebooks
Biden: I use teleprompter
What an amazing, God fearing woman, God bless her!
Goes to show the need for younger representatives. We need more sharp tacks like her.
She is not a rep.
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
10 cent china comment huh?
@@mlkcookie8890 How you conclude that? Also China is for Amy Barrett
“That’s impressive.” Yes, the Honorable Amy Coney Barrett is exactly that.
She’s awesome!
LOL she's more qualified than both men running for President
@STEFAN' SINGHANATH Would Nancy Pelosi or Mitch McConnell be better than Trump
"When you tell the truth you don't need to have a good memory,"Jesse Ventura 2011
My brother was her Law Clerk. He learned so much under her. She’s an amazing person and woman
That was so fun to watch! Thank you for posting it.
Boss af!! 😂
hahahahahahahahaha she rocks
Intelligent women! Love it No Notes Needed.
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
What are the Vegas odds that Biden could pull that off for 5 minutes during this without doing pushups?
Wow. She has a wealth of knowledge.
WOOOT WOOOT JUDGE!
i am tired seeing the useless senators trashing each other for nothing. I wish they all go to the farm plant some trees with judge Berrett, at the end of the day she will be approved (not matter what these democrats trying) and we got some trees for the future.
Ducsieu Ma , ...the best suggestion and solution for clean energy.They need work to do, because they are painfully wasting our hard earned tax money.
Lol exactly shes got this.
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
I fell in love with her intelligence right there! Go AMY!!!
When a Trump appointee can't have a single bad thing said about her from the left, you know they chose wisely!
I think most of us are just tired of repeating the same thing to conservatives like yourself who will disregard any valid argument we make and will rebut it by only saying "Trump 2020".
Well they called her a colonializing racist because she has adopted children who were originally from haiti... that guy was laughed at afterwards 🤣
That is really impress everybody ! She is library herself of Law ! So no one of Democrat can hurt her !!! We American people can understand and see what she has been through from the day 1 .... God bless you Amy and your family ! God bless us America !
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
I love it!
She’s way out of my league but I have such a crush on ACB
I remember when Justice Roberts was exactly in this situation, he was the smartest dude in the room, he knew the what, when, where and who in all of his cases, democrats couldnt put a dent on him...
too bad roberts turned liberal on us, many say the corrupt FBI and oboma have some dirt on him... I believe it.
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment?
You go girl 💪👍. Wishing you nothing but the best for you appointment. ❤️Jess
God I wish she was a SC judge in my country! 😪
Okay folks, this is epic.
To say that I died when she whipped that out is an absolute understatement
QUEEN! 👑
Badass
She don't need notes!! She has a brain!
is that why she couldn't remember the 5 freedoms of the 1st amendment? She shouldve had notes, smart people usually take notes. Example A: Eistein
You know what amazes me? All comments here, from people who actually watched her and listened to her, are not bad comments. I mean, people who actually took their time and listened to what she has to say. All the hate comes from the very fact that she was nominated by Donald Trump. I am sure if more people heard her they would definitely change their mind
God bless her heart
That was a gangster move right there, holding up that blank pad. 😎
Insert thug life, glasses, and Dre beat
Don't worry commies, it will be full of names by the end of the day!!!
sounds like you have CDS
Lmao you going to right your daddy Trumps name down as hes bff with communist Russia?
@@skylinez4793 go home to mommy, btw your mother is voting for Trump ;)
@@matta8569 lmao if a broom was in the election against Trump I’d vote for the broom. People are tired of a narcissist nut case running our country. The biggest pos joke to this country.
@@skylinez4793 Leave the brooms alone you perv lol He gets done what we want him to get done, and he's sooo good at trolling & triggering you pricks.. that alone buy's him my vote. Don't worry you'll get your first woman prez in 2024 when Ivanka takes over ;)
That was such a badness move lmao
Lmao!
*mic drop*
David Blaine's assistant lol. Can you show us that trick again?
Were you watching this Joe?!
Made him look like a dame fool!! Give her the seat!! Thank you Trump!! Give Trump 4 more years!!
You know John Cornyn is a Republican right? He is trying to make Barrett look good.
Cnn breaking news: she held a white note book so she's a white supermist.
Such a wonderful beautiful woman from the inside and outside
Let the memes fly 😂
A human memory can only go so far... also why is the questioner going in a round about way to ask something...
Wow
It’s all in my head turbo
She is amazing and will serve our country well. God Bless honorable Judge Barrett
She looks like Pam from the office
Reminds me of Laura Linney from the "Ozarks"
Catching feeling up here
I didn't know Amy Adams was trying to go on the SC
I am in awe of this brilliant and gracious Judge ACB!
No notes necessary to say nothing
Sotomayor did not bring and preparation materials to her confirmation either. You knuckle draggers are so easily impressed and manipulated.
The smug is strong with this one
I love this woman!
She came prepared with the truth.
I knew she was smart but damn! Impressive!
What a brilliant mind.
This is the most intimidating woman I’ve ever laid eyes on
Such a baller move! Loved it!
Savage moment!
Maybe if she brought her notes, she could anwers some questions.
Straight savage. 🤣🤣
God, she so effing cool!!! In all seriousness, she's a good fit. She may not exactly have that much experience, however she's shown that she has the intelligence to be an excellent supreme court justice.
first rule of every hearing: never ask a question, if you do not know the answer
to
EPIC FAIL!!!
Badass😂
Finally someone who isn’t a puppet who thinks for there self
Mix drop moment. All plebs the lot of them. This woman is a God send.
Woah such smart. Much impress
I already love this women
but she cudn't remember 1st A itums....
We need a thug life version STAT