Is reality itself.. impenetrable? - Afterthoughts on SCI-Arc's Slavoj Žižek / Graham Harman Debate
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- A SCI-Arc Channel Clip Joint: SCI-Arc invites you to take a closer look at a debate between two philosophers with a particular influence on art and culture. What about this event should interest an artist, student, or architect? Gathering commentary on the debate from SCI-Arc faculty and guests after the fact, the video revives the oral tradition in a contemporary format as a bonafide mode for disseminating and evolving theory.
Watch the full discussion: • Slavoj Žižek and Graha...
Featuring:
Jeffrey Kipnis (Professor, Ohio State University, SCI-Arc distinguished faculty)
Tom Wiscombe (Tom Wiscombe Design, SCI-Arc B.Arch Program Chair)
Hernan Diaz Alonso (Xefirotarch, SCI-Arc Director/CEO)
Anna Neimark (First Office, SCI-Arc faculty)
Slavoj Zizek (International Director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities, Global Distinguished Professor of German at NYU)
Graham Harman (Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at SCI-Arc, on leave from the American University in Cairo)
Crew Credits:
Production:
Creator and Executive Producer - Hernan Diaz Alonso
Producer - Ryan Scavnicky
Director - Reza Monahan
Director of Photography - Sean Morris
Camera A - Alex Zarth
Camera B - Jamie Ginesky
Sound Engineer - Scotty Tipton
Lighting Tech - Ruben Diaz
Makeup - Katrina Bell
Production Assistant - Robert Moreno
Post-Production:
Story Producer - Ryan Scavnicky
VFX/Editor - Alexey Marfin/Reza Monahan
Clip - Monty Python's Life of Brian
1979 Python (Monty) Pictures Limited.
Film Still - Psycho
Copyright 1960 Shamley Productions, Inc. Renewed 1988 by Universal City Studios, Inc.
©2017 SCI-Arc Channel
![FNAF vs TF2 - Episode 2 [SFM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z5b3V2-VLb0/mqdefault.jpg)
These are not just after thoughts, these are the so called vainglorious 'intellectuals' with their extremely condescending and patronizing attitude, trying to advocate the discourse of OOO and their hero Graham harman, by calling one of the most important contemporary philosophers, Slavoj Zizek, and then putting him down.
All opinions indirectly imply or say something like: "Zizek says A, but on the other hand Graham says B which makes so much more sense." Much of their interpretations are highly incorrect, misinformed and skewed with respect to Zizek's arguments. These architects and proponents of a very traditional cerebral and superficial notion of Formalism, with their craving for autonomy (in a pretentious artistic sense and not in a political or social sense) to architecture, are completely delusional. The video is very smartly edited such that it ends perfectly, where it seems like Zizek is giving up and handing the task over to Graham. This is not how a discourse is produced. This is pure strategic marketing move of a very smart institution like SciArc.
the way they speak to sound more intelligent and their inclination towards ooo philosopher is itself enough to determine their failure to comprehend the conversation. these afterthoughts are just trying 'forget what about what happened and keep following OOO'
I had Jeff Kipnis as a studio professor, when I decided to challenge his ideas (if there are any) during class he completely flipped and called me full of shit, what a lame wanna be theorist who cant defend his ideas and will throw ad hominem slurs at students who don't absorb his claptrap
dialogue or a mutlilogue! That's how far I got
Why do they all have rings on their fingers?
maybe nothing exists, not even for a moment, it is always becoming something else, things do, not are
I meant objects...did I say things? we can't have things
@@bradmodd7856 Bro reinvented Heraclitus
Things/Objects do ? Really ?
When looking at a flag waving, which moves first ? The wind or the flag ?
you have pineapples and mountain rangers hahahah
Talks about talks are somehow eerie 😨
Stop it 🧐
Pointless pretentious comments made by people who want to sound smart.