Go to ground.news/WAI to stay fully informed and get global perspectives. Subscribe through my link for 50% off unlimited access or try it out for less than $1/month! Starship launch before the end of February? What do you think?
Your example of media bias with ground news was on point. It also frustrates me as the launches each had a vehicle failure and loss, but only one is ever talked about. Blue Origin lost the booster, while SpaceX lost their ship. Both were partially successful and also had a failure, but you wouldn’t know that by listening to the media.
10:41 What is a STASRHIP ??? Maybe a Top Secret ploy by WAI and SpaceX to confuse the other Space Competitors ??? Could be a new T-shirt on the way with the secret code STASRHIP ???
@@christopherlee3871 That’s why no one at NASA criticises SpaceX and Elon’s completely fake and unrealistic timeolan because they know they will be fired then.
Considering the amount of LOX they will need, it doesn't make sense to have it delivered by trucks. An air separation plant is the only thing that makes sense. They will be able to produce all of their LOX and LN2 on site at much lower cost. Are they getting their methane from a pipeline or trucked in?
A Hundreds of trucks, with Methane !!! What surprises me is that I once years ago, read in an operating license for the Stargate that fuel production on site was expressly prohibited... hmm strange
As far as I can tell methane will still be trucked in, however increasing the number of methane trucks is much easier when they aren’t “competing” with LOX and Nitrogen trucks.
I thought their giant secret is bigger payload door or, in better case (only for the near future), - expendable 2nd or even 3d stage.. With such an advantage (rapid reusability of the first stage) it is unreasonable to wait for full completion of the lunar/marsian versions of the spaceship, i mean in this decade we can live without complete reusability and there are a lot of payloads besides Starlink constellation..
Towers need big water deluge system mounted on the tower to cover itself and the launch mount for landing. Need more water storage and gas tanks to deploy it.
I think that Spacex will need to determine what was leaking and fix that issue in addition to a bigger vent and fire suppression system, since a fuel leak is a major issue. I don't think that Spacex has designed the starship with a large amount of excess fuel it can just give away to the atmosphere and still be able to complete it's landing objectives.
I'm probably not going to subscribe to ground news because I'm poor, but I must say, that was a very good Ad, Felix. It went through a real life example of why the service was useful and really demonstrated value you'd get in return for utilizing the service. It also didn't 'feel' like an Ad because you related it to the content you cover seamlessly. If ground news is anything like your Ad for it, I'll consider subscribing to it if I manage to get into the financial situation that affords it. Thanks!
Anyone else think it would be more efficient to have 1 tower optimized for launches and the other tower optimized for catches? Launch from one, catch from the other.
@@schtormmBetter not be true; FAA/AST has a true legally-required public safety job to do. We just had the first airplane collision in 16 years after they got rid of hundreds of FAA personnel- & no FAA Administrator due to Elon . - Dave Huntsman
I've been watching your videos since the beginning. Got my grandson watching couple months ago. I think you've made the big time my friend. According to my grandson-----> YOUR THE GOAT 😅 truthfully not sure what that means but I think you've impressed him.❤
Would have been interested to know what state the Tesla Roadster was in considering many mentioned that it would deteriorate very quickly in the environment of Space. Don’t know if that was discernible when it was dictated probably not I presume.
Felix at 11:32 in this video shows a static fire. When the engines start there appear several "lines" of what appears to be frost venting? At first I thought it was just ice shaken from the ship as the shock of engine ignition shook the ship. Then I thought maybe transpirational cooling tiles? But it seems to be coming from the un shielded side. Any ideas? Am I seeing things?
Waiting to see SpaceX to do a series of tests on a flown booster. That will be a signal that they may be getting close to reusing a flown booster for the first time.
@@imaginary_friend7300 Cryo tests and wet dress rehearsal. When they treat it like a new booster they are really checking it to make sure it's all still functioning as it should.
I watch every one of your videos. I have watched them all for over a year. I actively DONT subscribe because of the repeated annoying statements telling me too in every video. It gets tiring. Please remove this and I'm sure you will start to actually increase the percent who do! People subscribe because of good content and dont like being told what to do, trust the process!
Mommy mommy. I’m mad because I don’t like something so I’m not gonna say if dinner was good but I will continue to eat your cooking. Honestly really friend? What is annoying to you friend? These guys do an excellent job. If you have feedback be constructively specific so they can actually do something “what about it”
I don't religiously watch. So not subscribed as a result. But I agree it is very repetitive and long. Luckily I have Sponsor block which skips it a lot of the time.
@Starship is a prototype doing test flights. Like Scott Manley said: "you know what was in the right place it was Starship which about 8 minutes later successfully made it to orbit becoming I believe the largest spacecraft ever launched into orbit now technically okay it's not exactly in orbit it was slightly suborbital but it had so close to orbital energy that anybody that tries to split those hairs is just you know some weird SpaceX hater. SpaceX deliberately chose for this flight to not quite go to orbit for safety reasons and it could easily have got there."
So tiring having to wait for news I am looking for. Is SpaceX certain it knows why Ship 7 exploded? Has the flaw been corrected? Will FAA allow next flight? When is flight 8?
Your answers are Yes, Yes, Yes and Soon. Typically there is no public announcement of details until the official investigation is closed and spacex tends to summarise the details when they post the info for the next flight. The FAA will allow a flight once the problem has been solved, spacex needs the problem to be solved to get to Mars so they have done that as they don't want to waste hardware repeating the same mistake twice.
Return landing on the launch tower is unnecessary, dangerous and costly. The best thing SX can do right now is to create a landing platform featuring two landing towers; landing the Starship between the two. Easy to build, far less costly and eliminates unnecessary use of the launch tower itself. It would benefit rather than hurt quick turn around times.
Yet the reason they want to do it is because it has the potential to save both turn around time and dry mass. That's why it's better to leave engineering to actual engineers.
I don't think so. Very different scales. BO about 4 million pounds of thrust at launch, SX just shy of 17 million pounds at lauch. So the BO pad etc needs to endure fast less abuse.
New Glenn has only flown once, and it's way less powerful than Starship. Falcon Heavy also doesn't damage it's launch pad and its a lot more powerful NG = 1,750 tons of thrust, Starship (v3) = 10,000 t Falcon Heavy = 2450 t
New Glenn pad is a refurbished SaturnV ones, so wouldn't have any problem in dealing with a rocket half of that (but Starship is twice bigger than the SaturnV, so even on 39A could cause some damages), about disconnect junction, New Glenn uses a erectors that tilt before launch, that could expose the base of the erector to the engines exhaust, but the fuel lines are much higher and move faster and further away than in the case of Starship, so probably aren't affected at all.
starship uses lots of engines so that when one doesn't work they have enough to compensate. Booster 14 returned to the tower with an engine out on the boostback burn.
You would need to build a new space shuttle for starters. And that would be more expensive and would take easily a decade. Than on top of that the boosters would need to be changed for the different load. Going from falcon 9 to falcon heavy took them much more time and money than they had anticipated. And all that while the starship is basically a new space shuttle with more space inside?
Does anyone wanna take a guess which block version will be the first complete lunch system to go into operational commercial use for a non spaceX/ govt customer?
My guess is block 3 for both ship and booster, and for bonus points I suspect a raptor v4 will be the engine that powers the first customer payload to orbit.
Why would an awful lot of people in Europe wish Musk harm? How has Musk harmed Europeans? Is expressing your opinions freely evil and harmful? People are truly suffering form Stockholm syndrome, instead of rebelling against their authoritarian oppressors they strike out against people pointing out how subdued they are.
@@admarsandbeyond This is exactly it. Stockholm Syndrome, but it goes so much deeper. Non-commercial drivers licenses are a perfect example. Tell people they should be abolished as they have no bearing on road safety and are purely a means of tracking and control.
Kleine Berichtigung die Chopsticks wurden nur vom Gelben LR11000 Installiert. Marv stand nur daneben und Schaute zu. :-D Small correction, the chopsticks were only installed with the yellow LR11000. Marv just stood there and watched. :-D
Related to the negative headlines for spaceX compared to the ones for Blue Origen, let's be honest, Elon has not been making himself very popular lately with all his politics meddling all over the world.
While the FAA is fumbling over spacex's anomaly's airport infrastructure and safety hit an all time low ! The FAA has alot of explaining to do ! sad ! 😢prayers sent to all who died a few days ago at reagen int airport !
18:31 that isn’t actually Musks car. It was agreed in writing that that car was to be given to Martin Eberhard. Musk then decided to take it anyways and gave Eberhard a crashed one instead. The full story is online as it resulted in a lawsuit. Edit: for those who don’t know, Martin Eberhard was one of the actual, original founders of Tesla.
I dont see the point in even bringing starships back to earth anytime soon. Just leave them in space ready to be refueled. They dont need heat tiles for Lunar entry and landing.
@@tehice23 Yes, that was the one aspect he didn't think of. He is right that there is no need to bring a ship back right away. Potentially one can loiter in orbit if there are any issues (schedule or technical) at a tower.
Go to ground.news/WAI to stay fully informed and get global perspectives. Subscribe through my link for 50% off unlimited access or try it out for less than $1/month!
Starship launch before the end of February? What do you think?
Methalox rocks!
Your example of media bias with ground news was on point. It also frustrates me as the launches each had a vehicle failure and loss, but only one is ever talked about. Blue Origin lost the booster, while SpaceX lost their ship. Both were partially successful and also had a failure, but you wouldn’t know that by listening to the media.
10:41 What is a STASRHIP ??? Maybe a Top Secret ploy by WAI and SpaceX to confuse the other Space Competitors ??? Could be a new T-shirt on the way with the secret code STASRHIP ???
For anyone wondering starship flight 8 is expected to launch no later than Feb 24th.
thats the start of the fcc license, the flight 7 launch happened a month after the start of its fcc license so dont except 8 to go before march
Thanks, now I know when to avoid taking a flight to the carribbean.
@@SterlingArchimedes Don't play into that Agenda 2050 crap. That's how they want you to feel.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@SterlingArchimedes all those ATC recordings of terrified pilots was really something, huh?
Starship is fully reusable it just takes some time to collect all debris and rebuild it.
😂😂😂😂😂🎉
And to force the resignation of the head of the FAA who was going to delay the next launch.
@@christopherlee3871 Good, delays don't get us into space faster.
@@christopherlee3871 That’s why no one at NASA criticises SpaceX and Elon’s completely fake and unrealistic timeolan because they know they will be fired then.
Yeah... Recycling stainless steel is a fussy process.
Considering the amount of LOX they will need, it doesn't make sense to have it delivered by trucks. An air separation plant is the only thing that makes sense. They will be able to produce all of their LOX and LN2 on site at much lower cost.
Are they getting their methane from a pipeline or trucked in?
A Hundreds of trucks, with Methane !!! What surprises me is that I once years ago, read in an operating license for the Stargate that fuel production on site was expressly prohibited... hmm strange
As far as I can tell methane will still be trucked in, however increasing the number of methane trucks is much easier when they aren’t “competing” with LOX and Nitrogen trucks.
I never thought about it but you're right, the media does seem to favor Blue Origin. Awesome video/great work!
Great to see these short snaps from films , plans or documents. Its really good fun with so condensated but clear informations
I thought their giant secret is bigger payload door or, in better case (only for the near future), - expendable 2nd or even 3d stage.. With such an advantage (rapid reusability of the first stage) it is unreasonable to wait for full completion of the lunar/marsian versions of the spaceship, i mean in this decade we can live without complete reusability and there are a lot of payloads besides Starlink constellation..
We'll see about that. As long as the FAA isn't finished with flight 7, this booster isn't going anywhere. I'm not getting spaceXcited yet.
You really think the Football Federation Australia is interested in spaceships ??
The FAA will give them the clearance I’m sure the debris was within the allotted field I hope they get a quick clearance
@@berndbuchholz Just got to kick it REAL hard! 😂
@@Johnny5CDsomeone’s car got impaled. That’s not supposed to happen.
he'll probably send the FAA his heart .......
Great episode Felix. Thanks for you amazing research.
Towers need big water deluge system mounted on the tower to cover itself and the launch mount for landing. Need more water storage and gas tanks to deploy it.
Pad B for launch, Pad A for catching, looking like that's the plan
I think that Spacex will need to determine what was leaking and fix that issue in addition to a bigger vent and fire suppression system, since a fuel leak is a major issue. I don't think that Spacex has designed the starship with a large amount of excess fuel it can just give away to the atmosphere and still be able to complete it's landing objectives.
SpaceX refers to it as the West Pad. Why does everybody else call it Pad B?
I'm probably not going to subscribe to ground news because I'm poor, but I must say, that was a very good Ad, Felix. It went through a real life example of why the service was useful and really demonstrated value you'd get in return for utilizing the service. It also didn't 'feel' like an Ad because you related it to the content you cover seamlessly.
If ground news is anything like your Ad for it, I'll consider subscribing to it if I manage to get into the financial situation that affords it.
Thanks!
Thanks you , nice WAI and Spacex .. 😊👍🏼🚀
Anyone else think it would be more efficient to have 1 tower optimized for launches and the other tower optimized for catches? Launch from one, catch from the other.
Thanks again. It's amazing how much happened since the last video. The pace is astounding compared to how things used to be.
Nice video, like every time 😊
10:38 "STASRHIP 34" XD
I love your enthusiasm my dear friend Felix keep up the good work I enjoy your videos so much
"Less than a month away...."
You say that Felix while the FAA is still investigating flight 7.
The head of the Department of Government Efficiency is watching them closely
The FAA basically listens to Musk at this point, no way they'll investigate that much LOL
@@schtormmBetter not be true; FAA/AST has a true legally-required public safety job to do. We just had the first airplane collision in 16 years after they got rid of hundreds of FAA personnel- & no FAA Administrator due to Elon . - Dave Huntsman
Musk doesn’t want to detonate any more Starships either.
@@dphuntsman thats bad pr man, hope there will be no more major hickups in the near future or elon can pack up his things in the government
Again my weekly waited video is here 😊😊
I switched videos to watch this.
Yeah, shadow zone uploaded at the same time.
Me too
Me too
👏👏
❤❤❤
Can't wait for Starship to come to Florida. I will be there.
Thank you, WAI
Great Video, as always! The humor and enthusiasm are always great. In addition to all the very good information.
good update thank you🤠🤠
I'm pretty sure that flight 9 would be the first chance at a ship catch.
Please make a visual comparison of the gigabay with an Egyptian pyramid.
Or a baseball stadium
Yes, you're right, that's great news.
I've been watching your videos since the beginning. Got my grandson watching couple months ago. I think you've made the big time my friend. According to my grandson-----> YOUR THE GOAT 😅
truthfully not sure what that means but I think you've impressed him.❤
We're not even close to a man rated Starship . They have to quit blowing stuff up 1st !
Thanks!
Thanks, for exciting news❤😂, we can watch the launch of Starships 8 in a month .
🎵"Fly me TOO the moon"🎵 ??? (17:00) ...correction: to
Okay... so what comes after the Gigabay? Terabay? And then Petabay?
kilobay
Wait for the exabay - from the EUA to England! Never a paved ocean was so pretty... :P
Garbage bay, they can put all the scraps of this failed program in it.
Next size up is the MichaelBay.
I'm stoked so exited
Funny how so many people know these "secrets" isnt it?
Is it possible to launch straight out of the chopsticks?
Nevermind, he answered that
Make it burn dem sticks😂
I think pad B is for catching Starship only...of course I'm not a rocket scientist but I did stay at a Holliday Inn Express last night...lol
Then why the giant flame deflector?
@@countmorbid3187 excellent point
@@bryansweazy9850 You should send those people at the Holiday Inn a sternly worded letter!
Would have been interested to know what state the Tesla Roadster was in considering many mentioned that it would deteriorate very quickly in the environment of Space. Don’t know if that was discernible when it was dictated probably not I presume.
Felix at 11:32 in this video shows a static fire. When the engines start there appear several "lines" of what appears to be frost venting?
At first I thought it was just ice shaken from the ship as the shock of engine ignition shook the ship. Then I thought maybe transpirational cooling tiles? But it seems to be coming from the un shielded side. Any ideas? Am I seeing things?
Thanks for the news Felix, when do you think pad b Will be operational?
When it's rdy
Operational hopefully this year. Production at the Cape will likely spoil up in 26!
Waiting to see SpaceX to do a series of tests on a flown booster. That will be a signal that they may be getting close to reusing a flown booster for the first time.
What tests did they do on the first f9 they reflew?
@@imaginary_friend7300 Cryo tests and wet dress rehearsal. When they treat it like a new booster they are really checking it to make sure it's all still functioning as it should.
@@roycsinclair I remember watching Grasshopper explode. Can you believe it's been 14 years? I still remember it like it was yesterday.
I watch every one of your videos. I have watched them all for over a year. I actively DONT subscribe because of the repeated annoying statements telling me too in every video. It gets tiring. Please remove this and I'm sure you will start to actually increase the percent who do!
People subscribe because of good content and dont like being told what to do, trust the process!
@@jonnybreeze honest question: what annoying statements are you referring to
@@desertrat7634 telling everyone they aren't subscribed 👍
he is just making those statements because there are people out there who genuinely forget to subscribe
Mommy mommy. I’m mad because I don’t like something so I’m not gonna say if dinner was good but I will continue to eat your cooking. Honestly really friend? What is annoying to you friend? These guys do an excellent job. If you have feedback be constructively specific so they can actually do something “what about it”
I don't religiously watch. So not subscribed as a result. But I agree it is very repetitive and long. Luckily I have Sponsor block which skips it a lot of the time.
Keep telling people to like and subscribe, your videos are great and worth the small request that they subscribe.
Will Gigabay be "clear span" or will it have internal columns? Has to withstand hurricanes.
Patiently waiting for weight testing on Cape Canaveral towers. What is the status of that location?
The space online community is growing fast.
7:05 I like both, blue origin will mean we will be able to amazon stuff to mars and the moon, spacex will bring humans to mars and the moon
Blue Origin doesn't have anything that can send big payloads (and affordably) to Mars or the Moon.
@@admarsandbeyondneither does starship 😂
@ Starship could send way more payload right now, and a lot cheaper than NG with an expendable S2
@ lol starship cant even reach orbit 😂 the heaviest load it carried was a 🍌 🤣
@Starship is a prototype doing test flights. Like Scott Manley said: "you know what was in the right place it was Starship which about 8 minutes later successfully made it to orbit becoming I believe the largest spacecraft ever launched into orbit now technically okay it's not exactly in orbit it was slightly suborbital but it had so close to orbital energy that anybody that tries to split those hairs is just you know some weird SpaceX hater. SpaceX deliberately chose for this flight to not quite go to orbit for safety reasons and it could easily have got there."
When are we going to see a Raptor 3 on a booster?
How long until the Terabay 😁
Isn't february 24 too optimistic? Will there not be an investigation on the failure of Starship 7, burning up?
So tiring having to wait for news I am looking for. Is SpaceX certain it knows why Ship 7 exploded? Has the flaw been corrected? Will FAA allow next flight? When is flight 8?
Get a Starship in Space and operating already instead of spreading its debris over the Caribbean, Atlantic, Africa, and the Indian Ocean.
Your answers are Yes, Yes, Yes and Soon. Typically there is no public announcement of details until the official investigation is closed and spacex tends to summarise the details when they post the info for the next flight. The FAA will allow a flight once the problem has been solved, spacex needs the problem to be solved to get to Mars so they have done that as they don't want to waste hardware repeating the same mistake twice.
Thanks Felix! The bags stretch the cables and pretension helps spool up tightly.
I just want to get to Roberts road churning out rockets and SpaceX hopefully not smashing into the moon.. where's the fast forward button 😂
I thought the drawbridge was rated for 2000 tons+ load capability ?
I'm genuinely surprised that car hasn't been bleached white by UV radiation
imagine getting hit by a car in space going at 121,000 km/h💀
Return landing on the launch tower is unnecessary, dangerous and costly. The best thing SX can do right now is to create a landing platform featuring two landing towers; landing the Starship between the two. Easy to build, far less costly and eliminates unnecessary use of the launch tower itself. It would benefit rather than hurt quick turn around times.
Yet the reason they want to do it is because it has the potential to save both turn around time and dry mass. That's why it's better to leave engineering to actual engineers.
the reason for landing on the tower is so it can refuel and launch in hours and not have to be transported back to the tower.
I think you mean that as the cost DEcreases...😊 I'm just being nitpicky.
What was the secret?
Felix when is the next episode of raptor flight?
When are the raptor 3's going to fly?
You can fit a bit over 1% of humanity in the Florida mega bay.
Does Blue Origin have the same pad & quick disconnect issues as Space X and if not why?
I don't think so. Very different scales. BO about 4 million pounds of thrust at launch, SX just shy of 17 million pounds at lauch. So the BO pad etc needs to endure fast less abuse.
New Glenn has only flown once, and it's way less powerful than Starship. Falcon Heavy also doesn't damage it's launch pad and its a lot more powerful
NG = 1,750 tons of thrust,
Starship (v3) = 10,000 t
Falcon Heavy = 2450 t
@@admarsandbeyond Thanks guys
New Glenn pad is a refurbished SaturnV ones, so wouldn't have any problem in dealing with a rocket half of that (but Starship is twice bigger than the SaturnV, so even on 39A could cause some damages), about disconnect junction, New Glenn uses a erectors that tilt before launch, that could expose the base of the erector to the engines exhaust, but the fuel lines are much higher and move faster and further away than in the case of Starship, so probably aren't affected at all.
@@theOrionsarms Thanks
Lets gooo! Love the videos!
Will flight 8 takeoff from tower 2?
Very likely not.
@@Whataboutit Thnaks for the reply, what flight number should we expect tower 2/B to be oprativ?
When they have a block 2 booster ready to fly is the most likely answer.
They need to make a tower flame diverter witch is mobile for the catch it will help the return inferno........
I have no idea what you mean with that lol.
Can someone explain to me why star ship doesn't use air spikes it would cut down on engines (therefore weight )
Aerospikes seem nice in paper but in practice they are not worth the money and effort.
starship uses lots of engines so that when one doesn't work they have enough to compensate. Booster 14 returned to the tower with an engine out on the boostback burn.
Maybe SpaceX should make a bid for NASA VAB now that SLS is probably going to get cancelled.
I don't think that building would suit their needs very well tbh.
@@MorganaThot It'll need to be entirely gutted and redone, but it's big and close to LC39B that will also have no purpose.
I believe they were in discussions but decided against using it.
2:15 anyone wanna comment😑?
What if we build a new space shuttle with more space inside tied to 2 Space X retrievable boosters?
You would need to build a new space shuttle for starters. And that would be more expensive and would take easily a decade. Than on top of that the boosters would need to be changed for the different load. Going from falcon 9 to falcon heavy took them much more time and money than they had anticipated. And all that while the starship is basically a new space shuttle with more space inside?
Hey Elon, you can't park there.
Thank you Sir...
Too many commercials, Felix
Google is greedy.
Adblock, sponsor block, don't use mobile.
Wait End for This. Felix Great Job
The 20:34 minutes video was released 6 minutes ago and it already has 233 upvotes.
Not anymore a secret as soon as it's discovered.
Does anyone wanna take a guess which block version will be the first complete lunch system to go into operational commercial use for a non spaceX/ govt customer?
My guess is block 3 for both ship and booster, and for bonus points I suspect a raptor v4 will be the engine that powers the first customer payload to orbit.
@@CyberSamurai4Life Starship isn't really aimed at the commercial launch market.
@@imaginary_friend7300 Are you high? That's literally it's entire purpose for existing.
Will president musk be on the next flight? I suspect an awful lot of people in Europe hope so?
Why would an awful lot of people in Europe wish Musk harm? How has Musk harmed Europeans? Is expressing your opinions freely evil and harmful? People are truly suffering form Stockholm syndrome, instead of rebelling against their authoritarian oppressors they strike out against people pointing out how subdued they are.
@@admarsandbeyond Yes. Opinions are to be censored unless approved. These people are not that bright.
@@admarsandbeyond This is exactly it. Stockholm Syndrome, but it goes so much deeper. Non-commercial drivers licenses are a perfect example. Tell people they should be abolished as they have no bearing on road safety and are purely a means of tracking and control.
STASRHIP 33!?
Felix - too many commercial interruptions!
Thanks Felix. ❤
Felix is my go-to for Starship updates. Let's dive right in.
Kleine Berichtigung die Chopsticks wurden nur vom Gelben LR11000 Installiert. Marv stand nur daneben und Schaute zu. :-D Small correction, the chopsticks were only installed with the yellow LR11000. Marv just stood there and watched. :-D
They used both cranes to connect the chopsticks to the carrage each lifting one stick and holding it in place for them to be connected together.
When is New Glenn launching its next rocket?
Why can’t you just look up specs for winch from offshore oil primary use?
Related to the negative headlines for spaceX compared to the ones for Blue Origen, let's be honest, Elon has not been making himself very popular lately with all his politics meddling all over the world.
Authoritarian regimes generally object to individuals having opinions and expressing them openly. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
"starship" is a failure and so is the raptor engine. they just can't admit it because in that case it is all over for spacex
Is this a real comment? Please respond with a racial slur to prove your not a bot.
0:02 but fligt 7 just happened...
11:16 STASRHIP 31! Amazing
While the FAA is fumbling over spacex's anomaly's airport infrastructure and safety hit an all time low ! The FAA has alot of explaining to do ! sad ! 😢prayers sent to all who died a few days ago at reagen int airport !
18:31 that isn’t actually Musks car.
It was agreed in writing that that car was to be given to Martin Eberhard. Musk then decided to take it anyways and gave Eberhard a crashed one instead. The full story is online as it resulted in a lawsuit.
Edit: for those who don’t know, Martin Eberhard was one of the actual, original founders of Tesla.
Musk, Eberhard, Tarpenning, Wright, and Straubel are all officially co-founders of Tesla.
"Stasrhip" Need a spell checker, dude.
SpaceX has promised NASA fuel transfer between two starships in 2025. Do u really think that will happen on 2025?
Yes. Very likely.
When is the next flight test sir?
Before March according to SpaceX.
If you copy/paste „Starship“ please make sure to spellcheck the source… 🤪🤣
I dont see the point in even bringing starships back to earth anytime soon. Just leave them in space ready to be refueled. They dont need heat tiles for Lunar entry and landing.
No littering
@shaya_g lol
So, you would send refuling SHIPS to refuel A SHIP and then leave those refuling SHIPS floating in space? Hmmmmmmm 🤔
@@tehice23 Yes, that was the one aspect he didn't think of. He is right that there is no need to bring a ship back right away. Potentially one can loiter in orbit if there are any issues (schedule or technical) at a tower.
@tehice23 Use those ships to build megastructures in orbit or structures on the moon. Design as dual purpose.
HI Felix!! Thanks for the news. YOU ROCK!