This NEW Shooter claims it will evolve the genre - Off the Grid
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- LIKE and SUBSCRIBE with NOTIFICATIONS ON if you enjoyed the video! 👍
💪BECOME A MEMBER OF THE CHANNEL - ruclips.net/user/Bi...
💰 DONATE: streamlabs.com...
👕 PICK UP A T-SHIRT & MOUSEPAD: ttkapparel.com
🖥️ Off the Grid Website: playoffthegrid...
▶️ GET CONNECTED:
🎥 MoreBigfry: / morebigfry
🖥️ Website | bigfry.tv
🎮 Game Store | www.nexus.gg/B...
👉 Discord | / discord
🐦 Twitter | / bigfrytv
📷 Instagram | / bigfrytv
📱 TikTok | tiktok.com/Big...
Outro Cover Done by: / @zulegmat 
Игры
LIKE and SUBSCRIBE with NOTIFICATIONS ON if you enjoyed the video! 👍
💪BECOME A MEMBER OF THE CHANNEL - ruclips.net/user/BigfryTVjoin
👕 PICK UP A T-SHIRT & MOUSEPAD: ttkapparel.com
🖥 Off the Grid Website: playoffthegrid.com
Games are easy to make , but every one is about money, so games become bad , but they are very easy to make
Anyway I seen people make some of the best games ever, but the gaming community is more about drama then gaming, and not many people understand computers all that will , but time can fix that ,if it doesn't run out first :D well see how far we all get
BigfryTV- "mic drop"
I wish someone would mention how "play2earn" is just another really great way to attract cheaters...
Yea tht sound like bullshit, all those big brands behind this shit are trying to pull a quicky, next thing you know it's be in all games, I'll never support this shit
Honestly, I don’t want a game to revolutionize FPS’s.
I just want a good FPS to play.
Don’t we all
If your not playing hell let loose then your the reason why all games are shit
This…
try csgo
Honestly, no matter how good you make a traditional multiplayer FPS, it's going to become stale pretty fast. This genre needs a new gameplay loop to keep itself fresh
if i'd have a penny every time someone says their new indie shooter will revolutionize the fps genre, id have about 50$
even blue drake says his game will be revolutionary.
@@usonlyus7148 The only thing that bluedrake's game is doing that's interesting is being free and having mod support, literally nothing else.
You would probably have more than that
@@usonlyus7148 Ahh bluedrake...the man that'll swear a fridge is so revolutionary that it will take man to the moon before an actual space vessel!
The day before part 2
Reason why this might fail
Factor 1: Games that prioritizes monetization before the game are most likely to fail
Factor 2: The line "Revolutionize a Genre" seems to cause the game to disappoint
Factor 3: All hype without a product
Factor 4: Not transparent with it's clients
Factor 5: All Promises
We can create a side by side comparison with the 2015 Green light, Early Access, Indiegogo, Kickstarter shit fest with what's happening currently
and NFT factor 6
Factor 6: NFT bullsh
Factor 7: NFT shibull
Well the phrase attracts attention and generates hype, for better or for worse. Most of the time the later too.
Might? No, this game WILL fail.
Me hearing about the first part of the game: "This sounds interesting, wonder how it will turn out."
Me hearing about it being NFT based:"This sounds most certainly like a scam."
@@EV-99x Ergo, NFT-based... If a games primary unit of currency is "coins", then in the context of OP's comment, it's coin-based. Likewise, if a games primary unit of currency is NFT's, then it is NFT-based. Pretty simple, really. Don't know why you're blindly defending this random ass project to begin with, what stake do you hold in it's success?
yea i had the same idea.. and if it has nft in it, im not touching it. might as well play escape from tarkov
I see nft I stay away 😁👍
@@EV-99x he was talking about $GUNZ token and there is a secondary token as well, it is Blockchain game bro
@@EV-99x You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? 😅
Dev: "We're revolutionizing the fps genre!"
Me: "uh, huh."
Dev: "It's a battle Royale with 150 players!"
Me: "Daring today, aren't we?"
You forgot "open world"
@@ssvensic Because BRs are totally never "open world".
Maybe they'll even have a scoreboard
@@Lenariet where do we draw the line between "big map" & "open world"? Because I wouldn't call Warzone open world.
@@Darek_B52 Not a bad question, maybe I'll think some more about it. Maybe "open world" is a term that has been and will get further washed down in time similar to how every online-only game these days loves to either itself slap the tag "MMO" on it or sees its community do that.
Maybe the line is single- vs. multiplayer? I don't think I have ever seen online games get labelled as "open world", not even very large ones. At best or worst they then get called "MMO".
Loading times being nonexistent was I think one of the main definition points of open world back in its earlier days. But loading times have become less of a thing over time in gaming, thanks to streaming and procedural generation and level of detail and all that.
no product, empty promises and NFT's. Sounds like a great game.
What ? There is a product and it will be delivered.
You think that pcgamer, ign etc would just publish all these articles if there was no substance?
How dumb can you be?
Trailers are coming with actual in-game footage wait for it.
Also sounds like CIG shenanigans. Lol wasn't surprised to hear they're involved
Just remember BF2042 was supposed to "revolutionize" the FPS genre...it did, and not for the better.
"The next generation of Frist Person Shooters"
nfts and battle royal, two of the worst parts of gaming to bring together
Its nothing wrong with the BR genre, it just got oversaturated with a lot of weak products. There is a reason why modern warfare, pubg, fortnite is doing and did so good. Dont be that guy who thinks his opinion is the ultimate fact cuz it’s not.
@@riisky2411 BR games are boring end of discussion
u still stuck in 2018 mate the market is oversaturated
@@riisky2411 Lol no wonder ur favorite br is actually
the worst which is PUBG yea that game is a cheaters heaven
"Evolving the gaming genre" doesn't mean anything if you're making a game in an oversaturated market known as "battle Royales"
Maybe this game won't end up like The Day Before 😂
@@riisky2411 3 battle Royale games huh? You got Fortnite, PUBG, Apex, Warzone, Super People, Realm Royale and about 300 other BR games that are on steam right now.
And yeah, 6v6 is oversaturated too but did I mention it in my comment? No. Did I say "mAkE iT 6v6"? No.
Nice comment tho, you tried for sure.
@@riisky2411 but that's not what you said
@@riisky2411 you're absolutely fuckin delusional mate if you think that the battle royale genre isn't oversaturated. I'm just letting you know that. Who cares if "a bunch of shitty game devs make BRs blah blah blah" it still adds to the market no? And the whole 6v6 game mode has been around for AT LEAST 25 years. A lot of shooters utilize it because it's for competitive playing.
@@riisky2411 Battle Royales are overrated and nobody gives a fuck. I haven't touched one in 5 years. Only BR I might try again is Warzone only because it's a fast-paced COD-like. Turns out Star Citizen is a better FPS than these shitty ass games.
Gaming is not a genre. Battle royale is a gaming genre. So they are trying to evolve the battle royale genre, what is wrong in that ?
Most people like battle royale, you are just a sad minority crying
Don't aim to evolve the genre, just make a good game with some unique ideas, I'm still waiting for iron harvest with foxhole or titanfall gameplay
I want MechWarrior and Titanfall to have a baby
@@SneccTheSnake I just started to see what mech warrior is since yesterday and saw that hired steel animation looked dope
@@elgringofeo9348 I know right?!
I'm a bit on the old side so I grew up with classic mech warrior on Xbox original. It used to have split screen couch co-op, sad that it's gone but the recent games look way better so I'm sure it would be much harder on a single console for couch co-op.
Also massive recommendation for mech-warrior 5: mercenaries
Ah yes hitting all the buzzwords! UE5 the GOD ENGINE that turns poop into gold. NFT AND CRYPTO HOLY SHIT! CYBERPUNK HOLY SHIT! VISIONARY DIRECTOR THAT CREATED A GOOD MOVIE 10 YEARS AGO HOLY SHIT. This is going to be the most basic project and it's going revolutionize nothing.
Wait, I actually haven't seen MeTaVeRsE yet. Damn, they gotta step up their game... The FuTuRe is all about the mEtAVeRsE.
Very interesting to see Neill Blomkamp’s involvement. He’s my favorite movie director so I’ll keep an eye on this one but the whole NFT Battle Royale thing just sounds lame to me :(
Oh look, a dude from outside the gaming industry to stumble into it, claiming the boldest of things while having NFTs/blockchain involvement in that backpack of his... Like, that's TOTALLY unheard of...
Perhaps a movie director should stick with his area of expertise and not pretend to know a thing about an entirely different industry, let alone being able to revolutionize it... because that kind of massive overestimation of one's own abilities being hardly short of arrogance is a pattern of red flags that keeps repeating with quite some frequency as far as these shitty NFT/mEtaVeRsE projects are concerned.
I’ll watch vids but I’m not keeping any body part on a bullshit nft game
@@Lenariet shut up
wait he is your favorite director? Why? Dude made all of 2 good movies. I mean District 9 was a good movie. Elysium was.. So so. Chappie was a retelling of short circuit. I dunno. Dude is no Paul Verhoeven.
same
If this is where the game industry is going, man, I'm not coming. Though, I know there's always going to be studios or devs who put work in without gimmicks, just good games. Best believe they'll be getting my support.
Battle Royale? - Check.
NFTs? - Check.
buyable digital "property" in the game? - Check.
At this point I am rooting for their failure.
I love that Breakpoint “shut down” a month after announcing NFTs. I’m hyped for this to fail.
Prolly another shitty "this will be the next game" type bullshit? CHECK
This one made me chuckle
Honestly, how to go from "oh, that sounds interesting" to "Hanz, get ze flammenwerfer!" in about 10 minutes...
Doesn't sound like a Battle Royal though, there's no urgency mechanic. It's more like DayZ by the sounds of it - the world is persistent with players able to drop in and survive by starting with nothing, building themselves up, and then fighting other players or together against AI.
If someone aims to ”revolutionize a genre” it needs to be more than just a new take on battle royale. It literally needs to be a new thing similar to what BR was.
When a game starts off talking about how they can monetize it and not the actual gameplay, then you know what to expect already.
Neill Blomkamp's Elysium was a big inspiration for COD Advanced Warfare. Without Elysium, Advanced Warfare probably didn't existed in the first place. I was wondering when Neill would set foot in the gaming industry. The world of Elysium could be an amazing setting for a hardcore survival shooter in the same vain as Escape From Tarkov, Hunt: Showdown and Marauders.
damn, we live in age when games devs don't want to create a game.
The gaming industry really need to go back in time and make a game like they where before ! I play retro gaming sometimes and there is a lot, really a lot of ideas, mechanics etc... that's not in in any modern games nowdays, some companies really need to start looking at their first games and check what made thoses games succesful !
This is not by making something HUGE and infinite like Star Citizen that you will revolutionize the gaming industry, even sometimes open world games completly failed and more closed games or more simple games work, because a game is not just trying to replicate real life, today everything is focus on graphics, realism etc.. but not on the main stuff that make a game successful !
90% of the time, I have more fun on "simple" games (Non Open world, acceptable graphics, etc...), inde games or retro games instead of a top of the notch latest RTX, DLSS Ultra Graphics games !
Whew, that's a big name team. This is gonna be interesting to see. Sounds like a blockchain game though going by the in-game market/economy thing you said.
Edit: Yep. Okay, this got a lot more interesting, and I don't really mean that in a positive way.
Yeah Ngl the idea of a cyberpunk battle royal with a storyline that exists within a match sounds sick… but uh… *yikes*
@@reneebear3641 Hahaha, a (good) story in a match-based only-multiplayer game... Yeah, right, and I'm the flying spaghetti unicorn.
@@Lenariet
Yeah fair
@@reneebear3641 playing with a friend would be weird because they could have progressed a different storyline and that may make the story less impactful because they'll be skipping a whole lot in your play through and getting spoilers early For a Story playthrough they haven't started. Yikes indeed.
Yeah cyberpunk devs were saying it's going to be like the second coming too, and it was a dumpster fire. Don't trust any game company, especially in 2022
"Don't trust any game company, especially in 2022" remove 'game' from your sentence XD
@@K3rhos Well yeah. But we're talking about games.
Great video, and definitely agree with your take on crypto and nfts in games and how companies are increasingly implementing bullshit strategies to get us to spend more and more money.
"Blockchain NFTs in BR"
I facepalmed, and then proceeded to lose all interest.
Idk man for me as soon as I hear “NFT or Crypto” when it comes to games (or really anything else I like) I’m done.
I want a great video game, not a (possible) opportunity to try to make money from in-game items in a video game. And so far literally almost every crypto/nft game so far is either a scam or it’s a total crap game.
Idk maybe someone will do it right one day or actually make a good game with nft/crypto involved in it. But until the day happens I’m immediately out when I hear those words because what it means is this project is mainly for either the company or the players to make money off of you and not to make a good game. And that’s really ALL I care about in a game!
What he said ^^
Amen.
The ONLY reason DeFi could have a place in gaming is censorship resistance and market broadening because if your game has a DeFi component running on an EVM chain then your game token has liquidity pairings on an EVM chain.
But, censorship resistance for a video game which is running on centralized servers with devs that have God mode doesn't make any sense lol.
I verbally yelled out, "eww!" when they wrote that the game was going to be another Battle Royale.
I'm pretty much done with those type of games at the moment- such a saturated genre.
The fact that it's going to have NFTs integrated is going to kill it.
That “real life” part at the end hit harder than I thought it would 😂 I can’t stand where the gaming industry is heading and I’ve been gaming since the 90s. Absolute shame. I don’t see this game succeeding if that’s their platform. BRs need to die.
@@riisky2411, no, BRs used to be awesome and then they all became virtually identical. It’s nothing but a rinse and repeat every match. If you’re into that, cool. It doesn’t need to be in every game though.
@@riisky2411, except that’s what the vast majority of players want 🙃
The way the gaming industry is heading is not NFT or Cryptos fault.
NFTs and crypto might even change the path for a better one.
You have no clue since there are no big games with this kind of system yet and you are all crying over it.
Like a bunch of conservatives, it is always the older crying too, maybe just maybe you grew out of playing games?
They know if they put it on their website they will get torn up by us gamers! Thanks Fry for sharing never heard of this project before.
I am so proud to be following this channel. At first I was thinking “wait he’s a bit easy on them” but by the end I was like “this is the down to earth REAL journalism i want to see”
The irony of a game set in a cyberpunk setting intended to nickle and dime you out of every penny and keep you hooked on the game so you can make more money through digital assets is amazing
I just want more games with the divisions dark zone system, where there’s an open pve map and then open pvpve areas I’m surprised they didn’t catch on more tbh
You are right, but Division 1 DZ was broken and Division 2 DZ is lame so..
@@MolkoKillStyle yeah, I liked the location of Division 1s much better and yeah the second one had like no risk it felt so much easier than the first
Every time I see an NFT/crypto related game project I just go “how many times do I have to teach you this lesson old man?”
Omg, one red flag after another:
(1) Promising meaningful story choices and a compelling narrative in a MULTIPLAYER game (in most cases story and narrative DIE the moment you add MP and especially when it's mandatory and forces people to interact with other players.)
(2) Random list of no-names. None of those names are familiar to me. Doesn't really matter where they worked before, for all I know they could have been volunteers making coffee for their colleagues. And it would be new to me that a movie director equals good game. Not to mention that some people will probably chuckle at the involvement of former CIG employees, because Star Citizen hasn't been able to completely silence those who have regarded it to be a scam since its earliest days.
(3) Blockchain/cypto/NFT/mEtAvErSe/wE bRiNg YoU tHe FuTuRe nonsense.
And I haven't even finished the video yet. Someone help me with my blood pressure here!
They are big names a lot of these people unfortunately ..they're all very senior dev who's lead teams in their respective positions for 15 to 25 yrs of game production.of some of the biggest early franchises and games( Richard Morgan is the writer of altered carbon books among other stuff he writes. he helped with the series also and crisis 1 2 writer. ) Olivia henriot or however you spell it was in charge of watch dogs 1 story and direction along with assasin creed syndicate and unity. can't remember what he did for division 2 though jen may did the animation for prototype 2 the kill animation and the same for assasin creed black flag. Neil bloomkamp needs no intro being a movie director of district 9 and elysium
But yeah 😄 we definitely don't need nft blockchains microtransactions and battle royal games so i agree
@@amanchoosesaslaveobeys6510 The most impressive what you mention there are the killing animations in Black Flag. If there ever was something good in AC it was the killing animations, even if Ubisoft did some heavy copy & paste from a few installments over to the next. The Division was nice to explore and quite immersive and I liked co-op missions. But stories in Ubisoft games, those are either non-existent or pretty trashy. Syndicate was my last AC and it bored me to death in every possible way, I actually liked the hate child Unity better. Crysis I never played. I never played Watchdogs either, but since that one is Ubisoft too I will just assume the story in it isn't worth wetting oneself over either.
@@Lenariet watch dogs 1 story is pretty decent actually( 2 and 3 are terrible) as far as watchdog 1 gameplay goes it standard with a few minor tricks that make it a bit more fun but i enjoy the broody revenge tale and voice of Aiden
Honestly think gamers must be retarded when they say they hate the play 2 earn concept or NFTs in games. So happy to pay companies for DLCs and skins but so reluctant to be able to be paid for selling their own skins and in game items. It just screams low IQ. Say a proper in game economy was created why would you not want to be able to be paid for something you already do for free? Low IQ merchants
Every time I see something like "trade customization x" I think of APB and how great their customization was and how no other game has ever even tried to compete with it. I hope that with this new craze of "make a thing and sell it and give us money too" allows for the same kind of customization in the near future. If you're unfamiliar, APB had a system of creating decals and then applying them along with using different color vectors on basic items to make your own customized outfit, cars, clothes, tattoos, etc. They went in so deep on customization that they allowed you to make your own kill theme and songs that you can play in your car. If that level of intricacy made it into any of these start ups, with even a modicum of successful advertisement, the team who made it would make a killing.
That would cut into selling cosmetic micro transactions though.
APB was an amazing game such a shame it wasn't improved upon
Red Flag1: Claims it will revolutionize the [insert genre] genre
Red Flag2: "Freedom" buzzword
Red Flag3: Team of industry level developers, always a red flag
Red Flag4: NFT/Blockchain project, probably the biggest red flag here.
This game is already dead.
Been saying for a while that the next evolution of the FPS was to have a large number of players on an even larger map.
The map is designed to be played squad vs pve, but at times either cooperatively or adversarially the players can cross over.
Love the ending. 😂
Man you really are the greatest voice for us old time (ha old time im in my 60's lol) gamers. thank you for being out there Big Guy ;)
Me: This sounds really interesting.
BigfryTV: It's a block chain NFT game
Me: Oh well, I'm tired of BR games anyway.
You nailed it with the statement "If they make good games they make [expletive deleted] money" but it seems like Hollywood they are incapable of that and instead just want to milk the customers off a monetization model which they prioritize over mechanics and gameplay. Their loss.
Honestly what absolutely _sells_ this thing to me is the backwards baseball cap... You see that and you know wrist-blade dude is for real!
Also, is 'Vesting' the cooler version of 'Investing'?
Assassin's creed style blade.
Blockchain and NFT
alright, I'm out. Thanks for the news at least
Same soon as I heard NFT this game was immediatly added to do not play list.
I’m a dude in my 30s. I’m so fed up with all this crap that’s been dumped on us over the years. Now, when I hear “NFT” in any relation to a game, it’s an absolute, 100% “will not purchase” and I assume the makers of that product are idiots that don’t play games.
And man, rarely is that wrong.
Wow another battle royale just what we need. Not like we have enough of those
I miss when FPS games were like MoH Airborne, CoD WaW and CoD Classic. There was something about these classics that felt so good and I find myself replaying them over and over to this day! Maybe freely choosing objectives in order and doing it in your way?
I don't know why I feel that this video is perfectly created 🧐
You've done your due diligence here BigFry. Good on you my dude!!
Once you said NFT I stopped caring about the game. I guarantee you this game comes out and it’s a Big scam.
Thank you BigFry for boiling it down. Monetization up. Quality Down. That's the fucking industry to a T and I'm just sick of it. I never do micro transactions, never have and never will.
As soon as I see that a game is associated with NFTs I've already moved on to other games. Let these game devs fail over this. It's their resume, not mine.
"*I* might go off the fucking grid" 😆
"but what everybody in the gaming space is failing to understand through no fault of their own is that this game is going to be a blockchain\NFT gaming project" water is wet, NFT games die on arrival or on production
This makes me think of the game Vigor. It’s a similar battle royale game based on the player going into town, killing players, gathering loot and extracting. It has a “hideout” type base the player stays at between games
Imagine calling yourself revolutionary and then putting out yet another battle royale
“Hey gaming journalists, do your fucking job!” 🤣👏🏼👏🏼 Statement of the decade 🤣🤣
Warframe did a great job of creating an economy, just have to grind 2,000 hours to finally get what you want. NFTs are going to implement pay to win factors instead of playing the game
Oh so you think cosmetics etc are pay 2 win?
I am 100% sure they will not implement pay 2 win that is suicidal and they are aware of that.
NFTs and Crypto is not the reason the gaming industry have turned into shit.
@@Skaro- Look at Apex Legends. Those “cosmetics” also allow for iron sight changes and aim down sight changes. Trust me, they will always find a way. Why do you think Call of Duty had a literal all black navy skin where you couldn’t see them in the corners of the map. They didn’t fix it for 6 months, everyone had that skin. These creators of skins aren’t thinking “Man how can I make sure these $20 skins don’t give any advantage but look cool” you’re mistaken. They want to blur the lines
@@Skaro- these NFTs will not help gaming because the gaming industry, like you said, is already shit. Why give nukes to a monkey is the same way of saying it
Excellent work, great video!
Hard agree with everything you said in the video dude. I thought the game looked kind of interesting until battle royale and crypto. Even the big names involved don't give me confidence when block chain is involved.
Why though ? What is it with blockchain technology that makes you look the other way?
Do you even know what you are talking about or are you just echoing what some big but dumb influencer once said about it?
One thing is certain, none of the big global companies look the other way and are all experimenting with it. Literally all industris are because they realize the potential. But I guess you know better 🤡
Ok I'm pretty sure there's something shady going on with the official teaser trailer on Gunzilla game channel. As of writing this, there's 7 mil views, 87k upvotes but only 1100 comments with top one having only 19 upvotes. And the comments are all like " wow the teaser looks so cool", " animations are great" or " wow nice animation, waiting for a sequel ". WTF is up with that? They all seem like bots to me.
7 million is a lot bro, it should be bots for sure
Really sad to see Neill Blomkamp backing this. He really is an amazing director, but this is just awful.
The number of devs with CIG (Cloud Imperium Games) on their resume is a warning sign to all.
NFTs are a miss for me, not interested.
The Stanley Parable is a perfect example of someone that really likes taking care of their game.
"third person battle Royale" and "revolutionize" don't go together first off, second I AINT SUPPORTING NO GOD DAMN NFT BULLSHIT
"I might go off the fucking grid."
💀🤣
Lol they lost me at battle Royale and running for the hills at NFT
The second cyberpunk battle Royale I knew who is gonna be worse or maybe slightly better version of Apex
Does he respond?
Yeeeeessss
Love the content Bigfry!
Here's a good rule of thumb for gaming. If crypto nfts are involved then find a different game.
Brilliant Video! Keep up the good work. The end of this video had me crying. Shit was hilarious.
If a game is good, I’ll play it. That’s like 99% decision making.
I wonder if “renting hideouts” is the ability to rent a hideout in the game that contains a literal hiding place and weapons and ammo. Like a little mini outpost. Would also be cool if the circle only closed when someone died. Would also be cool if the circle was PVE military bots and aerial units instead of just a circle.
I don’t have much hope for battle royal games but those are some things that i think would make it stand out,
Or like a zombie royal,
When a player dies, they become a slightly more powerful zombie than the AI, and the circle is just a wall of zombies flooding in, and the map is a bunch of districts surrounded by giant walls, kinda like in the movie “time” and all the walls are pressed against each other so the players have to make it through the giant doors before the doors close. That’s what’s holding the zombies (aka the circle) back. Idk something a lil different. I came up with this in about 10 minutes, if only I was a game director
This game gonna be a dumpster fire
This reminds me, weird concept. What if they made a Division style Shooter where the whole city is run over by monster and you essentially have a snow piercer style train on the perimeter of the city which constant keeps moving all over the map. In a circle, You spawn into it, and it's the main hub for your players interaction etc. you then get ready and find a station to get dropped off with your friends and it's sort of division in the part where you loot monsters/creatures you find and you go to harder parts of that city to find S class monsters LOL. plus also it's open world. Idk was smokin 😂 but it's better than what these devs think is "good"
Interesting
You lost me at "OTG is a third-person battle royale..."
Yeah, where's the good story-based FPS/TPS shooting experiences at? Why did that die? Everything is a fucking battle royale these days.
At first i was like :
"Okay, it's a battle royale. Kinda bored with it but sure"
Then it went :
"Okay, the teams looks nice, Chappie and District 9? Damn that's awesome"
But after a while :
"Blockchain game? NFTs? Nah.. Im out"
Just whyy?
Lost me at Battle Royale and then lost me straight in the Void at NFTs.
Forgot to add that I hope this game burns and fails and anyone in the dev team that actually believed it will work never gets any jobs again.
When i saw that weapon my interest went from 9 to 0 in a blink of an eye.
Rockstar Games is gonna take full advantage of that when GTA 6 is released.
As soon as I heard the words "NFT" and "Blockchain" I wasn't interested
I love your bluntness and disattached analysis, always enjoy your videos
After three decades of gaming, I basically want every single NFT project, including gaming, to fail.
"Off The Grid is a battle roya--" Aaaaaand there goes the interest.
I worked on this game last fall as a level designer. I was fired for screaming at the top of my lungs while drinking rubbing alcohol in the break room and eating other peoples food that was clearly marked.
i personally feel the only company that has always had my eyes when it came to trading items is Valve, tf2 and csgo trading back in the day was and still is the best thing ive experienced pertaining to per to per trading in a game.
I'm not much a fan of these Steam features myself, but they are certainly points I like to bring up whenever I want to give examples of how those presumably great many futuristic uses for NFTs have actually been a thing for many years now - entirely without blockchains and the term "NFT".
Bro I feel like I'm the only one that's excited for the future of gaming in a "play to earn" style with crypto
TY for mentioning the cycle. loved that game and it was over shadowed by other BRs. im excited for the cycle frontier.
sounds amazing basically like a hunger games type BR. Hope it lives up
I was interested for about 10secs then u said it's gonna be a battle royal. But kept watching cuz I still enjoy watching bigfrys content
Remember the OG Battefront games, those were good I liked those.
Can we have that again?
they already pointed to not other than NFT in the articles " Players will also be able to craft, customize, and trade in-game items with each other in a “unique way”. " , this is 100% NFTs haha
the last few minutes of the video is my favorite 🤣❤️❤️❤️
So, a cyberpunk battle royale where you play as a landlord??
NFT's aren't for gamers, they are for gamblers.
My real life mouse pad has been amazing. 🤘
As soon as NFT's were mentioned, I LOST ALL INTEREST IN THIS PROJECT
Enough with Battle Royales, Enough with the NFT's, Enough with the Micro-Transactions. Do developers not understand this? All we want is a quality game we can really enjoy. Hope this fails, sadly but honestly.
Big fry is really one of the few that are really bringing the good and the necessary to light. Appreciate you and this channel bro
Thanks for putting the time and effort into this video. Really appreciate your honesty and thoroughness.