Joe Rogan's worst misinformation yet, with RFK Jr.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 июн 2023
- Patreon: / drwilsondebunks
I rarely read RUclips comments these days, so if you want me to see your comment, here is how you can contact me directly and I will be glad to respond to you when I can: Email: dr.wilson.debunk@gmail.com
Facebook (direct message): / docwilsondebunks
Rotavirus vaccine information: ourworldindata.org/rotavirus-...
Basics on checmical context: www.assda.asn.au/technical-in...
What the peer-reviewed scientific literature says about the safety oof Thimerosal: www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
publications.aap.org/pediatri...
www.ajog.org/article/S0002-93...
www.thelancet.com/journals/la...
publications.aap.org/pediatri...
www.chop.edu/centers-programs...
Thimerosal effects on cells in a dish: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Adjuvants have been extensively safety tested over several decades: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Tdap has not been pulled in the US: www.healthline.com/health/adu...
DTaP and encephalitis: www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Extensive safety profile oof DTaP, Tdap, and other vaccines: nap.nationalacademies.org/cat...
Every first vaccine has been tested in placebo-controlled trials before going to market:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34780...
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley...
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwr...
Childhood vaccines have been incredibly impactful when it comes to saving lives and preventing suffering: publications.aap.org/pediatri...
Guide to vaccinology: www.nature.com/articles/s4157...
Measles statistics: www.cdc.gov/measles/downloads...
Polio paralysis rates in India before vaccines: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Breusewitz v. Wyeth case that RFK Jr. misrepresents: www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/U...
Kennedy himself is suing Merck in a frivolous lawsuit over their HPV vaccines, Kennedy knows he is lying here: www.law.com/dailybusinessrevi...
More information on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...
Why we vaccinate babies against Hep B:
www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/hea...
journals.lww.com/jcge/Abstrac...
Vaccines don’t cause autism:
autismsciencefoundation.org/w...
www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/...
www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJM...
nap.nationalacademies.org/cat...
It really is a better understanding leading to more autism diagnoses:
www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
www.statnews.com/2022/02/10/t...
Autism rates are actually similar across generations: jamanetwork.com/journals/jama...
European childhood vaccination coverage: www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/b...
--Description continued in pinned comment--
![Darren Waller - Who Knew (Her Perspective) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GytDjB8u6bM/mqdefault.jpg)
---- Description (sources used) continued ---
Cell phones don’t cause brain tumors or damage the blood brain barrier: www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.20702
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165017310000718?via%3Dihub
Why you should get vaccinated even if previously infected: www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04865-0
www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00159-7
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg9175
More on germinal centers: www.nature.com/articles/s41577-021-00657-1
Ivermectin doesn’t work for COVID:
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2797483
bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06348-5
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362
Vitamin D doesn’t work for COVID:
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0267918
www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2022-071230
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779952
How influenza causes secondary bacterial pneumonia: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642581/
AZT is an inhibitor of reverse transcriptase: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC386922/pdf/pnas00325-0322.pdf
Anti-retroviral cocktails save lives: ourworldindata.org/art-lives-saved
Christine Maggiore’s story: www.latimes.com/local/la-me-christine-maggiore30-2008dec30-story.html
Some pharmacovigilance of COVID vaccines: www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00054-8/fulltext
drive.google.com/file/d/1_wHIYX-tGkGBPwuax7N8BxZPR4PTTCDm/view
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110475
The 1976 flu vaccine story: www.history.com/news/swine-flu-rush-vaccine-election-year-1976
The FDA is not “funded” by big pharma (CORRECTION: second source here should have been included in the video): www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=6bc1186549ec
www.nature.com/articles/nbt.2786
Basics of Autism: www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352928
www.spectrumnews.org/news/new-studies-reveal-how-autism-might-alter-synapse-formation-pruning/
Song used for outro: Fan-made piece
Blah blah blah. Go debate
OK Dr. Willson just a little question about "drinking chlorine... " I understood the larger point you were trying to make and of course I agree ... but ... just how do you drink a gas 😅? pretty sure you would die from the effects of inhaling it first.
Also, your stomach isn't going to break down chlorine gas into hydrochloric acid, your stomach produces hydrochloric acid and a thick layer of mucus which is why your stomach doesn't digest itself. However if you swallow large quantities of hydrochloric acid you're going to have problems. But many of our medications are compounded with small amounts of hydrochloric acid.
@@paulacoyle5685 There are multiple states of matter and also solutions and mixtures. Such as chlorine tablets used for pools.
@@paulacoyle5685 go try it then
@@bobroberts8500 Joe rogan viewer right here jajaja.
It's real easy to sling mud. it's much more difficult to clean up the mess.
Dr Hortez approves this comment.
@@MessiahNonEstIt's "Hotez", and you're clearly embarrassed that he has credentials and education (and human decency) you can only dream of.
Both sides can say the exact same thing you said. That’s why it’s extremely important to research both sides with extreme thoroughness, and not listen to one side alone, or with bias. Bc it is very difficult to clean up messes.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." -Upton Sinclair
We've got a cast of characters here. Are you referring to someone in particular?
Yup. RFKjr is a glorified ambulance chaser.
@@kawasakiwhiptwo5821 I think immediatly of John Campbell.
@@emmajones8590 What are your feelings when you think of him?
Ohhhh…..
Lmao!
I seriously thought you were talking about this guy and the entire pharmaceutical companies!
😂
I wonder if the people that listen to RFK Jr. for medical advice go to their M.D. when they need legal advice.
Says the guy who takes medical advice from politicians
@@michaelstevenson8069 - Nope, only from qualified medical professionals.
It’s because they affirm Joe’s biases.
Why does Apple not recommend holding your phone up to your head?
From your iPhone legal document
To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, headphones, or other similar accessories. Cases with metal parts may change the RF performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested or certified.
Because of an abundance of caution. Every building, car, and business in California has a cancer warning on it. If you hold an dosimeter (reads for radioactivity) it won't read anything from an iphone. Not all radiation is radioactive. There are going to be random correlations that look like there are patterns but are just as I said random. This can be explained as "dartboard statistics" where you throw a whole bunch of darts on a barn and then draw the target after. Otherwise we have to believe that everything everywhere causes cancer.
This is essentially legalese to protect themselves from liability in case RFK types try to sue them with spurious correlations in cell phone usage and cancer rates.
Apple has probably not tested the RF frequency exposures with every single type of cell phone case out there, many made by third parties, so this is just a blanket warming against possible liability.
Though as a physicist, I cannot for the life of me imagine how even a metal case could change the RF enough to even get close to approaching dangerous levels.
Remember anything up to 300 GHz is withing safe guidelines, which is miles away from even 5 GHz, which is the highest frequencies that most cell phones use
@@ValleyDragonit even mentions some cases made of metal. I imagine they wrote this to protect them from shoddy third party companies who produce phone cases with unforseen side effects that people might blame on apple themselves.
Not that a simple metal case could possibly turn harmless radio waves into dangerous ionizing radiation, but this is a legal document, not a peer reviewed study.
If you have a a metal plate in your head
@@wallacegrommet9343 Incorrect, thats not what the guidelines say.
So if the ethylmercury was so benign why did they stop using it?
Misinformed public pressure? They found something better? They found something cheaper? Not hard to think of plausible explanations.
@@delfordchaffin5617 I think they were looking for an actual answer, not more questions.
At 6:07 you note that "pretty much all the mercury is excreted" and from that you draw the conclusion that ethylmercury is safe. This is an incorrect way of reasoning, because it may be the non-excreted mercury that does the damage.
From the 2002 "Three Faces of Mercury" paper by the University of Rochester in New York by the Department of Environmental Medicine:
"Ethyl mercury converts to inorganic mercury more rapidly than methyl mercury, but the latter produces more brain damage."
I direct you to the 3 papers cited in the 2 minutes before this time stamp you have here (three separate trials looking at neurological outcomes in fairly large population trials), rather than this descriptive paper you cite that has a few case reports of ethyl mercury exposures in much higher doses with a completely different method of ingestion (a serious of ivig infusions and plasma infusions). Those three papers aren’t just higher order types of data (larger sample size, an actual testable hypothesis, etc), they are also published after this 2002 paper you cite
@@ziachoudhury4769 Thank you for the papers. I have no challenge to their shared conclusion (i.e. that cognitive impairment is not associated with low-level thimerosal exposure in children). However, this conclusion is not the same thing as saying that ethylmercury is safe (the 2nd paper says as much in its conclusion).
There are large studies that draw the same conclusion for methylmercury exposure in children (e.g. Llop 2016, Myers 1998 & 2020, Patel 2019, Stratakis 2020, Vejrup 2022). However, I think you would probably agree with me that such studies do not provide a basis to say that methylmercury is safe.
As one of the papers that Wilson cites says: "no controlled studies of low-dose ethylmercury toxicity in humans have been conducted" (Hviid 2003 via Tamma 2009). This is because ethylmercury has traditionally been considered to have a similar safety profile to methylmercury (they differ by only one carbon atom), and so such controlled studies are not performed because they are considered reckless and dangerous.
Wilson's claim that ethylmercury leaves the body much quicker than methylmercury is true, but such blood-based analyses don't tell the whole mercury-bioaccumulation picture. Critically, when we look at primate models of ethylmercury vs methylmercury vaccines (Burbacher 2005), the words of the researchers note that: "there was a much higher proportion of inorganic Hg in the brain of thimerosal monkeys than in the brains of MeHg monkeys (up to 71% vs. 10%)" and that data from the "study support the prediction that, although little accumulation of Hg in the blood occurs over time with repeated vaccinations, accumulation of Hg in the brain of infants will occur. Thus, conclusion regarding the safety of thimerosal drawn from blood Hg clearance data in human infants receiving vaccines may not be valid, given the significantly slower half-life of Hg in the brain as observed in the infant macaques."
You need to be on JRE for sure! Thank you for standing up.
JRE?...LOL
JR would eat him alive .. wouldn't stand a chance..
@@andrewfinlay5160 100% agree, RFK and JR would shred this guy. dr.wilson is a pharma shill, its insane how dishonest this guy is.
@@andrewfinlay5160Rhetorical effectiveness isn’t the same as scientific knowledge or being correct. Maybe it wouldn’t go well for him, still doesn’t mean he’s wrong.
Below are just some of the studies that show negative biological effects of Radiofrequency or Wifi radiation.
While Non-ionizing radiation does not carry enough energy to remove an electron from an atom or molecule that does not mean that it can't have biological effects. Near infrared light has been shown to have positive biological effects while Wifi and Radiofrequency have been shown to have neagtive biological effects.
For exampole: Wifi and RF waves have been shown to increase the amount of Reactive Oxygen Species in sperm cells which can damage the DNA as mentioned in one of the studies below. So saying that Non-ionizing radiation doesn't cause DNA damage is not true. The damage is not caused by heating from these waves because the energy produced from phones is insignificant. It is well described the possible methodology of how these Electromagnetic waves could affect our mitochondria.
You also said that the radiations needs to be strong enough to penetrate through your skin. This is now how this works. Low frequency waves tend to penetrate materials more effectively than high frequency waves. For example, radio waves (which are low frequency) can penetrate walls and buildings, while higher frequency waves like X-rays are more likely to be absorbed or scattered by the materials they encounter.
I advocate more quality studies to be done in this area (studies that do not have conflict of interest!) and to take precautionary measures against Wifi and RF waves. It is important to note that being very close to the source of radiation is unadvised.
Blood-brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication (link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1019150510840)
Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211026781)
Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928468009000133)
Exercise ameliorates hippocampal damage induced by Wi-Fi radiation; a biochemical, histological, and immunohistochemical study (www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891061823000224)
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function (rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/152/6/R263.xml)
4:40 With regards to methyl mercury compared with ethyl mercury. The same difference is true between methyl alcohol (methanol) and ethyl alcohol (ethanol) drinking methanol even in small quantities regularly results in blindness and other conditions, whereas ethanol in reasonable quantities doesn’t.
Apples to oranges.
@@user-tf4ho2uo1e actually it’s a comparison between the two organic parts of the molecule methyl and ethyl.
I developed vaccine induced uveitis after a flu shot 20 years ago.
Could it have been mercury that caused my partial blindness?
@@MRCAGR1 That's why I find RFK Jr's mistake forgivable. The mercury actually *is* the same, just like he said. It's the chemical bound to the mercury that's different. Nobody actually calls sodium chloride and hydrogen chloride two different kinds of *chlorine.* Whoever tried to explain the issue to RFK Jr. did a lousy job of it.
@@MichaelJPartyka it's forgivable if someone corrects him on the point and he accepts the correction. If he continues to make the claim after being told why it's incorrect, then we have to ask whether it's wilful ignorance, or deliberate dishonesty.
21:18 I was at school in the early 1960’s and neither autism or ADHD were recognised. Anyone showing signs of these conditions was considered a disruptive influence or a daydreamer or worse.
Yes, exactly this!
Where are all the 60yr olds with autism today? They should still be around at the same rate we're seeing autism in children
@@unvaccinated6467 what do you mean by autism? I worked with adults with learning disabilities including autism. We are not talking about high functioning autism such as Asperger’s, those affected people are effectively behind an impenetrable barrier. A colleague of mine was high functioning and was working as a paramedic. Autism is a spectrum of signs and symptoms. Older people could be on the spectrum but have managed throughout their lives so why would they need a specific diagnosis?
@@unvaccinated6467 Sadly, autistic people, have an average life expectancy ranging from 39.5 years to 58 years. That's why.
@@unvaccinated6467That is an unenlightened view, one of many things you don't understand is social media didn't exist, so you simply didn't hear about it, and the stigma around having a child like that kept them hidden, that is until schools were created for them, huge signs saying, Spastic Centre, and they were transported in vehicles with, Spastic Bus in big letters up the side, many were abandoned into orphanages, I spent a large part of the 70's with my Father taking abandoned children out once a month, that is where I first experienced the damage caused by Thalidomide.
At 10:25, you say that the DPT vaccine "has never been pulled" and that it never caused damage, but RFK was talking about the whole-cell DPT vaccine (which was pulled in 1996) and not the acellular DTap and Tdap vaccines you are referring to.
Also, a paper put out in 1994 by the National Academy of Medicine said that there was a lack of sufficient evidence either for or against neurological damage from the DPT vaccines. The lawsuits and accused damage were the impetus for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
Acellular pertussis vac was discontinued due to fear of significant adverse effects but not because there was an actual proof of rare but significant adverse effects
Much of the impetus for this research has been the concern that pertussis vaccine could cause significant and permanent neurological damage. Recent reviews of these data do not support such an association (2) but the desire for an alternate vaccine continues because of the high rate of minor local and systemic adverse reactions following pertussis immunization .
Benefit vs risk ratio was still overwhelmingly in favor of cellular vaccine . Just that accelular was better now there are thoughts of bringing older vaccine back because of higher effectiveness .
A science communicator, not a scientist only, should debate RFK
Among the many other things, I wish people would stop calling it the Spanish Flu. It did not originate in Spain, but Spain was neutral during WW1 and freely reported the pandemic while other countries censored the news.
Kansas City epidemic doesn’t have the same ring to it.
True. Look to the yellow brick road. It came from Kansas (probably via pigs and started on an army base). How about we call it the Good 'Ole US Flue.
@@superclaymaster but it is a great name for a funk band.
@@paulspence7600 Interestingly thats where the new vaccine was being tested... just before all those soldiers vaccinated went off to fight in the war.
As much I enjoy Joe Rogan he has tendencies towards conspiracies and mysterious which is entertaining but can get dangerous when it goes to health related topics
I mean saying big pharma cares more about profit than lives isint conspiricy
I dont agree with them saying all vaccines are bad there are good ones but also bad ones
@@boneleg6952so who do you see when you get sick? That's right, them big bad dangerous doctors, who will treat you with that poison.
Health related topics?
That would be clean real food, no drugs, medicines, chemicals, GMO's, toxins...etc....etc.....That is HEALth!!
Conspiracies are crimes and nothing more..... is there something wrong with looking to see if a crime has been committed?
Mysteries...oh you bet there are..... plenty of 'em....the biggest mystery of all is how people can be so damn gullible (and stupid) to buy into taking something that does not work, because what it is suppose to work against does not in fact exist short of the theater and propaganda by their perceived overlords
Most of what he says is wrong I won’t say if it’s lies or incompetence because I don’t know for sure but it’s really dangerous because he’s the most listened to guy in the country and people will think he’s right because he’s rich that’s a huge problem with our country we think rich people are smart and moral people and we think poor or sick people are must have done something to deserve it
Thank you for this, I like JRE but I like the truth the most. We need you on JRE 😂
He lets people talk put their 2 cents in. This whole I don’t agree with so you so not be allowed to talk crap has got to stop. The problem is everyone wants to control what other people are doing and saying. If you don’t like the info change the channel. What RFK is saying is once you understand how the whole medical data system works you understand it will always side with whoever is funding it. Because they need that conclusion to generate more money for more funding. So you don’t necessarily get 100% accurate data. The data is skewed to support whoever’s funding it. Let’s say I’m a company I hire a scientist to research something for me and his findings will literally put me out of business. I’m not going to make that data public I’m gonna go hire another scientist to figure out how not to come to that conclusion. I will promise him more funding for a project that he wants in the future and the cycle continues. What the vaccine has done is made doctors that are coming up on retirement question everything that they’ve been reading for years. We’re at that level that every system is so corrupt you can’t trust anything. When do you have a system where politicians can be bought nothing is organic or legitimate it’s always gonna be skewed for profit.
This guy is too scared to debate anyone. Just sits an interpreter the way he wants. I'll debate him.
@@woodyjud7149So, lets hear it!
Peopel just need to stop watching JRE. IT's terribad.
@@beansnrice321 why is it terrible. Have you watched it
I cant validate everything but Dr. Wilson did misrepresent Rogans statement on vitamin D being a cure for Covid. Cuz Rogan never said "if u replace the Vitamin D in a sick person they will get better." As Wilson claims he did. @29:46 Rogan was talking about it as a preventative only, and never with certainty, just him talking about his logic of them being linked.
He also misrepresented rogan claiming that ivermectin helped him... He said he took it and other things and he got better quickly, he never claimed that ivermection was the reason. If you are "debunking" someone you have to stick only to the facts or you debunk yourself. There are other problems with this vid that are basically the same misinformation tactics that big pharma uses, and they are no better than rfk Jr.
Yeah they act like they are so smart saying vitamin d doesn’t cure covid well duh.but if you have low d levels when infected you get way sicker that’s a fact they want to hide so you get vaxed every year
Wilson didn't say that Rogan was saying that though. He said it was a reasonable question to ask, then explained that they got an answer to that question
@@richardelliott84 I think you should listen to the time stamp I posted. He does say Rogan said it would get rid of the sickness to replace the vitamin D. Hence his metaphor about cleaning up the ashes.
Maybe he didn't say it her but he said elsewhere. Joe Rogan is a crook.
He sounds like he has a frog in the throat. Is he OK? I learned that he has spasmodic dysphonia.
While kennedy was advocating for people harmed by large corporations he identifind his condition as a side affect of a vaccine ingredient.
I know you will say that there is no way to prove this. But when you live with a vaccine injury especially one that affects the way you talk or the way you see, you appreciate people who try to get to truth versus just debunking those of us struggling to find answers.
More! More! More! (I yell as I smash my fists holding my fork an knife on the table over and over)
Joe Rogan should understand the "2 Mercuries" concept very well. He wont shut up about THC & DMT being different depending on how you use it.
Go eat either mercury.
Both will kill you - This is embarrassing
like people trying to sell you a bridge.
the experimental drug is bad. no ifs ands or buts
RFK jr mentions a study where they tested monkeys and found that ethyl-mercury (or methyl?) indeed left the blood quickly but upon autopsy were found in large concentrations in the brain. it would be nice for you to address this as well..
Found in the brain, but decreases over time. There's also no evidence it does anything to hamper development either. People just see "mercury" and enter panic mode without thinking. That's how RFK Jr. gets you.
That study was in the early 2000’s and thimerosal was removed from most vaccines in 2001. A great example of scientists identifying a potential risk, testing for it, and then action being taken to make vaccines safer. Isn’t that a good thing? Wouldn’t it be more worrisome if they never found anything wrong with the vaccines?
If you can find the name of the study, I'll happily take a closer look.
Read up on the use of adjuvants in vaccines. It’s still not really understood why it is they cause the immune system to increase its response.
@@geraintwdit was done by Burbacher
Love the T-shirt!!!!! 👍😎👍
Ironic that I knew a great guy with autism that his only signs of autism was some stuttering, but less than RF J.
RFK has a disorder that causes involuntary muscle contractions, causing voice to be scratchy...not related to disability
@@mikfin210 It is a disability - he can't talk properly.
he meant it’s not a mental disability, likely remembering the president who seems to be thought to have one
This is a great video and hopefully serves as a good example to not only the scientific community, but all of academia. We are living in a time where science is being faced with greater scrutiny than it has in past decades. It is a much better use of your time breaking down the nuance of misinformation, rather than making outright attempts to silence it. This channel will hopefully grow an act as a voice against public confusion.
What is factually correct is we are living in a time where “Science” is not based on science but is now a religion.
@@philo3479 Does that make RFK Jr the AntiChrist?
@@christopherrobinson7541 No, Greta Thunberg acts like one, and looks like one.
Get boosted in the fall when they tell you to order follower
His refutation of RFK's claims, are not true. None of the children's vaccines found in the schedule have been tested against true placebos in stage 3. None of them. They have all been tested against other vaccines or substances which can be harmful. Have you bothered to check it out or do you just believe what they tell you?
Thank you for this video! ❤
And just like that your false sense of security is achieved 😇
❤
Thanks.
🍆🍌👅👅👅
On one side, the biggest anti-vaxxer in the world, on the other, the most credulous side of beef humanity has to offer.
You mean incredulous surely? He seems to go more counter culture as opposed to mainstream narratives.
Those of us who follow the mainstream guidance are credulous.
@@Jason-wm5qe Credulous means "gullible."
@@MickVegas precisely. We are the gullible ones for going with the path of least resistance. Like if the New York Times says it, I trust it.
It seems like Joe is skeptical being fair to him
@@Jason-wm5qe how is him bringing millionaires grifters on most of his episodes "counter culture"?
@@Jason-wm5qe "You mean incredulous surely?" 😀
No, he meant 'credulous', you silly thing!
I see English is not your strong point either.
09:12 They did not tested whether aluminium accumulated in the body, they only tested blood and hair…if aluminium accumulated in the central nervous system, would have they been able to find out ?
10:05 RFK is talking about DTP, not DTaP. He is not lying.
15:17 well if they got sued and lost money…weren’t they in the wrong ? Shouldn’t they be winning their lawsuits if their vaccines were effectively safe ? Isn’t it how justice work ?
18:34 How do you catch hepatitis B ? No one argued about the severity of it, just the way it’s transmitted.
20:00 Have you wondered why the studies always focus on ONE vaccine, as if they were taken in a vacuum ? You are expected to take more than 50 in your life, where are the studies that compare longitudinally vaccinated and unvaccinated people for overall health ? (Those studies exist by the way like Hooker & Miller)
Thanks!
Anyone else looking for that good morning guy or the one who spams that comment about lobsters in here? I was reading the comments on another video on this channel and those guys each have over ONE THOUSAND comments on his videos alone. Terrifying how obsessed those dudes are
Good god, that moron from hell was posting his cut-and-paste boldfaced/italicized nonsense within minutes of this video going up yesterday, and I wore my typing fingers out challenging him!
The lobster guy is Rab J. He's purely one of those " mythical Norwegian creatures " (YT hates the word, but if it's not obvious, search the term.) Generally, if you ignore them, they just go away.
GM1221 appears to be a genuine denier of a number of proven medical things. I really enjoy mocking him, but it's not worth engaging with him. It's impossible to win an argument with someones imagination.
@@diandian9827It was well worth wearing out your typing fingers - you did a great job! ⭐
Contact Rogan and put him straight
I burst out laughing when he started talking about how Wifi causes cancer. This is textbook pseudoscience that should raise red flags.
Maybe he meant that his WIFE causes cancer. ;)
WiFi can cause cancer if it’s powerful enough more likely to just give you an internal sunburn like if you walk in front of one of those big white cones on radio towers
You might be thinking about microwaves
people have gotten tumors from cellphones you tool lol! it's proven.
You should try to grow 2 of the same plants 1 next to your wifi router and 1 on the other side of your house. And see the results.
People who tend to not do adequate research and have no idea what they're talking about, loooove to use the word pseudoscience. They think it makes them look smarter, when in actually they appear very uninformed.
Ethylmercury: C2H5Hg+
Methylmercury: CH3Hg+
RFK Jr. needs to eat his own words and ‘stop this comic book description’ applied to his views on vaccines. He advocates understanding ‘the other side’ yet does none of it himself when it comes to anything scientific. He demonstrates his total lack of basic understanding of chemistry, let alone biochemistry and far beyond him to understand virology, immunology, vaccinology. And there remains no common language that each can understand each other,s ‘beef’
*"Ivermectin was tested in a randomised study in Columbia at a dose of 300 μg per kilogram per day for 5 days, but there was no discernible benefit. In a second, related trial carried out at five separate US locations, even doses of 390 to 470 g per kilogram per day for 3 days did not have any discernible effects."*
Just here to mock GM1221 .................
This is one of the comments I've been looking for, that guy is genuinely, worryingly unhinged.
@@iamjustkiwi Yes, GM1221 even refuses to acknowledge viruses exist. In my view there is little point arguing with people like that.
Also:
*In this meta-analysis of 12 randomized clinical trials involving 3901 patients, favorable mortality results were limited to trials in high-prevalence regions, with no evidence that ivermectin had a mortality benefit in low-prevalence regions. Meta-regression found an association between the regional prevalence of strongyloidiasis and risk of mortality, with a decrease in RR of 39% for each 5% increase in strongyloidiasis prevalence.*
Ivermectin only showed positive benefits in regions where strongyloidiasis (intestinal parasites) were endemic, and not controlled for.
The HIV story really got me, an effective (and sad) reality of being anti-vaccine. If that can’t convince someone then very little can. Appreciate the work DTF! 💉
Remember that folks born after the 1990s really didn't grow up with the threat of AIDS being presented to them by the MSM. The kids I know in their teens & 20's now don't even think of AIDS as a threat to them.
Two of my friends, both diagnosed HIV-positive, decided to end their treatment a few years ago. Both are still active in the community via apps like grindr and tindr. While both are passive or receptive men, thus their rates of communication are lower, it can be assumed that as their viral load increases, so will their opportunity to infect others. Not to mention the dissolution of their own immune defense. They stopped their meds at the beginning of Covid-19, and you can imagine the type of information that prompted their choice to terminate treatment. It's all likely to end in tragedy.
Atz killed tons of gays and had no benefit whatsoever. The gays revolted against fauci in the 80s.
Was Kary Mullis ever convinced that HIV was a proven cause of AIDS?
think of how many gays died because of "dr" Fauci
In fairness, he did say that all he asked for was one study that showed they are safe and effective which showed a control group and cross analysis. One could not be obtained. He also stated that the rate of autism in the populous has skyrocketed since the 1960s-70s and that no one can understand why that happened.
"...and that no one can understand why that happened."
Which shows he isn't looking at the scientific literature.
And of course, he has repeatedly blamed the vaccines. First it was the thimerosal, then it was MMR, now it's the many vaccines, and he'll happily rinse and repeat these three arguments. That thimerosal is largely removed from just about all vaccines, and thus cannot explain the increase in autism at all, he doesn't care. That the MMR vaccine has repeatedly been shown not to be associated with autism, he doesn't care (he'll just cite some bad paper here and there to suggest it may, or refer to the child abuser Andrew Wakefield). That no new vaccines have been added to the schedule for decades (until recently), and thus also cannot explain a rise in autism, he does not care. He'll keep on pointing at the vaccines.
Autism only became a diagnosis in 1980, when it was added to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM3). In 1998 it became Austism Spectrum Disorder, in DSM4. Note that it's always been recognised it runs in families e.g. it has a genetic base
The rate is the same as it always was. Diagnoses have skyrocketed. RFK has been told this multiple times. He likes falsehoods.
@@May_Day45 LOL @ "RFK is telling the truth." He wouldn't know the truth if it bit him. I wrote ....
"The rate is the same as it always was. _Diagnoses have skyrocketed._ RFK has been told this multiple times. He likes falsehoods."
I notice you didn't address that.
I'll also note that ASD is a description of behavioural characteristics. Go read them. Half the people in these comments, you included, are probably on the spectrum.
I trust you now feel like someone with a severe problem, who deserves to be stigmatised by RFK
@@May_Day45 Yes, he's telling the truth! The V industry naturally pushes the notion that it is all genetic. But genetics require a TRIGGER. I think RFK allows that vaccines probably are not the ONLY contributor. Rather, maybe other environmental toxins build up & set the stage, & then 4-5 vaccines at once may push a child over the edge. Untold thousands of parents have SEEN it happen!
"Exposure to mercury can cause immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions similar to traits defining or associated with autism, and the similarities extend to neuroanatomy, neurotransmitters, and biochemistry."
44:12 in the U.K. most of our regulatory agencies such as the MHRA and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) get most of their funding from the industries that they regulate. In fact the CAA is required to obtain all of its funding from the fees it charges, which includes annual airworthiness tests on aircraft. I’m not sure about the MHRA, I would think that it was 75% at least.
All these people complaining about pharma companies paying for their submissions to be assessed never seem able to come up with who should pay for it. It's kind of strange that they want pharma companies to be subsidised by having someone else pay for this process.
ruclips.net/video/OpaVCTtxBnE/видео.html
The media have been captured by big pharma, CNN, MSNBC, and the other big media outlets all brought to you by Pfizer, stands to reason you are only going to hear what Pfizer wants you to hear. Make them liable for their products and see the change that takes place. Pfizer are the proud holders of the largest fine for fraudulent practices, $2.3 billion in 2009. They have also admitted that the vaccines can be shed, so be careful who you snuggle up close to..
How about the billions of dollars in profits the pharmaceutical companies make. And instead of paying 130 billions of dollars to fund foreign wars we put that money towards our public health agencies… just a thought
I love it when he says "Now you are going beyond my expertise". The whole f*cking podcast is WAY beyond his expertise.RFK once said he loves science. Well, the love is not mutual. Joe Rogan as journalist is a catastrophy. His task would be to *critically* ask RFK about his views. Critically. RFK would not survive that for 10 minutes.
Seriously just glossing over when someone makes a claim but can't actually defend or explain it is like, anti-journalism.
Look guys, I don’t really care about RFK one way or another. I actually just paid attention to him for the first time when I ran across some video about the whole back and forth between Joe Rogan and that doctor from MSNBC when the doctor was offered over a million dollars to charity to debate RFK. And he wouldn’t. Why can’t we get anyone who knows what the hell they’re talking about to go and just debate the guy and go point by point through the anti-vax argument and demolish it in a very public and genuine way? It hurts the credibility of science in general… and for someone like me who believes in science and works in medicine it really does make me question the accepted consensus sometimes. And we can all admit that not all conspiracies are just crackpot theories, right? While I don’t know how people can make the leap to lizard people and blood-drinking, satanic pedophiles running our country - it does strengthen even QAnon as well as the anti-vaxers when there’s nobody who will stand up and take the time to refute the bullshit positions when challenged to debate them.
@@iamjustkiwi Seriously pretending that podcast, hosted by guy who never ever claimed to journalist and calls it "long conversation with friends and interesting people", is antijournalism is as stupid as it gets
He has been working with and representing the vaccine_injured and their families for well over a decade. He is an expert in the harm that some people suffer and is compassionate towards those harmed.
@@carlitaticconi6655 Really? Samoa 2019.
Vincent Racianello is going to record a video debunking this interview as well.
oh yeah
Vincent is too worried about retaining his NIH funding to ever be honest or objective about anything...especially in regards to Covid origins. Plus Vincent really just wants to continue to do his GOF/GOFROC research in NYC at Columbia University without any oversight or regulations.
Regardless, especially in the context of the past few years with mRNA vaccines, the "anti-vaxxer" label really just indicates that the person using it as a pejorative is either a simpleton or a shill. Why? There are a wide range of vaccine types for a wide array of virus types with a wide array of immune responses, durability, and safety profiles. So you have to evaluate each and every vaccine on its own merits.
In general, vaccines for slow mutating non-zoonotic viruses with long incubation times tend to be more effective and durable than vaccines for fast mutating zoonotic respiratory viruses with short incubation times like Sars-Cov-2. The more epitopes of multiple proteins from a virus that vaccines use, the broader the immune response with less likelihood of antigen escape. So an inactivated or attenuated vaccine using the whole virus with all of its proteins is going to provide a broader immune response that’s harder to evade than a vaccine that relies on only a few epitopes of a single protein of a virus. The Sars-Cov-2 mRNA vaccines rely on only a few epitopes of spike (S) protein’s receptor binding domain [RBD] and N-terminal domain [NTD] for its antigen. The NTD and RBD are the portions of this fast mutating single strand RNA virus that mutate the most.
Furthermore, we’ve aggrandized all the successful vaccines for viruses. Though we don’t even recognize all the failed attempts to make vaccines for a number of different viruses including Hep C, HiV, Epstein Barr, MERS, Sars-1, West Nile, Norovirus, Herpes HSV-1, etc. Vaccines are not always successful. More often they’re not.
Answer this on a video please, who funds the FDA? Where most of their money to do their job comes from? Thanks
mostly from tax payers
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Same as the funding given to Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu to create a deadly flu (coronavirus) at the Wu funded by NIAID.
Government does not produe an income of its own, all government and government agencies are paid through taxes: what exactly is the point you are trying to make.
Tax payer pay for the same regulatory bodies to manufacture the disease with tax dollars then then produce the treatment for that disease using tax dollars.
You really should be taking that issue up with that government and industry you trust so much.
@@MessiahNonEst The OP asked where does most FDA funding coming from, I said it's mostly tax payers......I have no idea how your rant relates to that
@@MessiahNonEst Ooh you are a clever clogs, NFT says it is our taxes (true) you ultimately agree with him but have to do a little patronising explanation of how government is funded. Did you just find that out?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman "I have no idea"
No need to tell me, I've had plenty of first hand of your "I have no idea"
Research: no idea
Use the Internet to research: no idea
Acronym refering to medical conditions: no idea
That Ben Hu began the flu from a lab in Wu: no idea
That 50% is negative not a positive in regards to safety: no idea.
I've got a bullet proof jacket that only stops 50% - ever second shot - half the bullets penertrate, for sale.
Only worn onne, a few holes approx 9mm in diameter, two holes #45, the owner no longer needs is as they died from a bullet wound.
You interested?
This was a really good explanation and breakdown on RFK’s claims. I’m now leaning more against his claims on vaccines. However, something that I would’ve liked to see differently is when considering if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a resounding YES.
You talk about how usually the questions he asks (we all ask) have already been asked and answered by a scientist somewhere, and debated in an office, classroom, water cooler, etc. Well the average person doesn’t have access to those conversations and that’s what we want to hear. We don’t want to continue with the “trust the experts” narrative. Sure, they might be right most of the time, but we want to understand it as well. We want to have access to those conversations, that’s how we get less distrustful. And what better way to do so than to have a debate with someone who has strong opposing views on the matter.
When asked if a scientist should debate RFK, the answer should be a YES, absolutely. There should be nothing to lose if we’re doing it in the name of curiosity, science and knowledge.
That is exactly the problem. RFK debating a scientist is exactly what he wants, especially a live debate. To the viewer, it makes it appear that RFK is on a similar level to a scientist before the debate had even started. When it does begin, RFK merely needs to go outside of the scope of the scientists field of expertise, or the scope of debate. Once he does, it is very easy for him to make whatever claim he likes without fear of contradiction. This is exactly what happened with Monkton when he debated a climate scientist live. Another outcome occured with Bill Nye vs Ken Ham, where Ham used a whole array of debating tactics, fallacies, and forged evidence. As soon as anyone bothered to check the claims of Ham, they quickly found that he had made most of it up.
A proper scientific debate is a lot more rigid though. It is slower for starters. Claims always need to be backed up with sources, and every source has the time to be checked. The whole point is to expose errors and find out what is right and wrong. This is the exact opposite of what RFK wants.
@@Skidzo19 What a pathetic deflection and excuse. The truth is, and pretty much the majority of people know it, the transfection and covidian cult has lied about everything and cannot defend itself in any face to face manner. There have been numerous debating forums with scientist against scientist organized and attempted to be organized, and the cult side never showed up. Pathetic. Your argument is a joke and only serves to justify your side's cowardice and lack of confidence.
@@philo3479You have no idea what deflection is, do you? It's the same topic. Funnily enough, this is also a debating tactic used during live debates.
A face to face debate is not necessary to review and debate evidence. This is regularly done in the scientific literature. RFK could also respond in video format to any of the videos made debunking him, which would therefore start a debate. So why doesn't he go ahead and do it?
Rogan doesn't give a flying fig about accuracy and truth. He is just in it for the clicks.
He makes around $20,000 per day and one might suggest that he contributes to the same number of individuals that suffer from poor decisions made by individuals who are mislead and have their ‘murcah cause free-dumb’ spirit monetised through clicks.
@@poerava And, when he is called out by people who know better, he always falls back on the, "Chill, bruh. I'm just a dumb meathead asking questions", excuse. No, he is actively promoting things that are controversial even when they are patently idiotic. I don't think he's as stupid as he likes to pretend to be. He may have zero actual knowledge about science but he sure knows what sells.
@@poerava hes worth over $100 million he dont care about clicks he couldnt spend the interest on that daily even if he tried to
@@christophercook9745
Mo money mo problems.
@@christophercook9745 he got to the level of wealth he has BECAUSE HE CARES ABOUT CLICKS. The money didnt just fucking appear in his account for no reason......
People....we need to share this video everywhere we can.
Lex Friedman send people to You, before letting Kennedy talk.
June 2023:
Huge leap in breast cancer survival rate
Women diagnosed since 2010 have a much lower risk of dying than those diagnosed in the 1990s.
The number of people who die after a breast cancer diagnosis has decreased by two-thirds since the 1990s, a study of more than half a million women in England has shown.
The research has taken ten years to complete, says Carolyn Taylor, lead author of the study and an oncologist at the University of Oxford, UK. The analysis includes the 512,447 women in England who were diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer between January 1993 and December 2015; the researchers tracked the women until December 2020 using data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service.
@neverforget1971 Somehow all that wifi exposure and bad vaccines did not lead to more cancer deaths for woman
WiFi radiation is essentially light that's not in the visible spectrum.
Im still not totally convinced that it's healthy
@@malcolmjelani3588 what, light?
If you're still concerned, realize that not only is it just another wavelength of light (but not harmful like uv), it's also extremely dim.
It's like a 20 watt bulb.
Also, it's the same as radio waves, and those have been bouncing around and going right through your body continuously for your whole life, that's how radios and TV, and even cell phones, work.
Remember, cell phones are really just walkie talkies that connect to very sophisticated towers, just hand held radios, there's nothing special going on.
These things have all been extensively tested and they have never given anyone cancer or anything else.
UV radiation is essentially light that's not in the visible spectrum.
Thank you for doing these videos! I was interested in hearing the buzz over RFK and saw Lex Fridman's shout-out to your channel. "Do your own research" often times seems to do more harm than good because I am not an expert! It would be preposterous for me to try to understand every single possible field when there are experts in these fields. Dr. Hotez disagreeing to debate on Rogan seems to unfortunately certify RFK Jr. and Rogan as trusted sources of information.
Agree, I’m not qualified to do my own research on such an in depth topic. I can’t know everything so I rely on experts.
they are more trusted than statist sources
Did Lex talked about it his RFK jr. Podcast?
Hotez is afraid he isnt correct and it will ruin his credibility.
@@akashbhargava906 Lex gave a shout out to Dr. Wilson and others who have counter arguments to claims RFK Jr. makes. During the episode, he mostly just listened without challenging. It was good if someone desired to listen to RFK Jr.’s claims, but there wasn’t an actual discussion.
Dr, Wilson, what is your view of Vinay Prasad?
Rogan is insufferable
The more growth hormone he takes the dumber he gets.
how do you know?
@@christophercook9745 ?
@@sayresrudy2644 how do you know he is unsufferable?
@@christophercook9745 this question is too stupid to reply to. apologies.
No surprise the Rogan bro's and RFK Jr followers in the comment section won't refute anything Dr Wilson said.
They won’t even dare respond to you as well . 🙂
I will push back on a couple of things. The media were absolutely disingenuous saying Joe took "horse dewormer" when ivermectin is a common drug given to humans. And Joe wasnt saying Vit D will cure covid, he said Vit D deficiency is a big issue and could lead to a weaker immune system and thus more susceptible to severe covid symptoms.
@@dkoliregardless of how they refer to it, the fact he still took ivermectin goes a LONG way to discredit him as someone worth taking seriously on basically anything other than getting TBIs from sport fighting - something he clearly seems to have experience with.
@@dkoli There is nothing disingenuous about pointing out the fact that Rogan has well documented history of promoting quackery/pseudo-science.
@@iamjustkiwi I never said he was did I.
47:55, JRE wasn't dangling money payable to Dr. HOTEZ, but to a charity of his choice. I think a charity unless fraudulent, is bound to do more good than harm, and debating an "anti-vaxxer" especially when that person is running for presidential elections is indeed the more responsible thing to do. So, to decline such an offer doesn't seem like the best course of action.
Yeah but it's not OKAY to debate anti vaxxers becuz reasons.
Has anyone ever called him out real time on his claims of vaccine trials not being conducted? I’ve looked but couldn’t find it. The closest I could come is his definition of Placebo is different than the conventional definition.
There is constant miscommunication, as RFK jr. implies double blind placebo testing prior licensing on especially long term adversary health effects. And of course he is right on that with the Covid vaccin, because long term testing was not possible in order to come with a quick repsonse. In some interviews he was asked if it were his intention to prohibit the vaccine to the people, and he said that 'of course' he is not, he only doesn't want a mandate on vaccins that have not undergone the long term safety protocols that are standard for any other kind of medicine. He stated he is a liberal and everybody should make their own choice to take such a vaccin or not.
Therefore I among others think it's very important to have an in depth debate between him and a scientist who is very knowledgeable on the subject, to get to the detail of it. The censoring attempts only make this debate worse, or even suspicious...
The vaxxine trials did not even take in to account whether the vax prevented corona or not.
They had to rush at the speed of science
Bill Burr pretty much told him hes not a doctor or scientist and neither of them could be qualified to put out this information at mass
It’s interesting because he’s open to debating anyone anytime and debates have been planned but people back out. In the Joe Rogan podcast RFK mentioned there was going to be several scientists debating him at the same time and they still backed out. Strange indeed
awesome takedown
why is no one going after Kennedy for his responsibility in the measles outbreak in Somoa a few years back? Kids directly died after Kennedy's visit there a few months earlier???
I'd written this for another comment, saw yours, so I've just re-posted here
From about 2010, there was a sustained anti Vx campaign in Samoa, led mainly by traditional faith healers. Immunisation rates dropped. In 2018 2 infants were given a shot, using muscle relaxant instead of saline, with the obvious tragic consequences. The nurses responsible did prison time, Vx rates plummeted.
In 2019 they had a measles outbreak. In 6000 cases, 83 people died, 80 of them under 4 years old. You can see in those numbers it wasn't just newborns, who were not protected in 2018/2019. It took out a wide range of children, and some adults.
RFK turned up in Samoa about 6 months before the outbreak, many people blame him. But you can see he was just using the 2018 event, as an opportunistic way to get publicity. He's of course is fully protected, as are his family. It's likely he uses the A-V thing, mainly for money and fame.
But he doesn't trumpet his involvement in Samoa, or even mention it. For the obvious reason
Incidentally, Samoa had a 99% immunisation rate for CV
@@Muritaipet I know he doesn't mention it which indicates his guilt in doing as such. What I don't get is why no one else does either. It's not going to be easy for him to respond to although I am sure he's anitivaxxer supporters won't care...
@@robertchflynn I really thought Samoa would be the end of the A-V nonsense. It's so fundamentally clear what happened. I was then absolutely horrified by the nonsense they came out with afterwards, to justify why their precious fantasy was being proven wrong. That's when I started challenging them.
RFK wrote to the Samoan Prime Minister during the outbreak, and mass vaccination campaign that stopped it. He said the outbreak was actually being caused by the vaccines.
I fundamentally agree with you BTW. I'd like to see RFK do time.
@@Muritaipet Time he visited Dallas.
@@christopherrobinson7541 No comment
*_"There is no such thing as a Ministry of Truth and why it is important to challenge conventional “wisdom” - A personal view"_*
Great Work. 🔥👍
Re: the Pfizer trial, they had ~21K ppl /arm. 1 of 21,000 vs 4 of 21,000 is not a significant difference
Excellent point. Rhetoric unchecked and a lack of critical thinking and due diligence is frighteningly dangerous in this modern society we find ourselves in.
@@benreiter7218 I have to wonder if RFK is some kind of psychopath. He knows the Maggiore story...
@@benreiter7218question why do who claim to be critical thinkers can never think at all .
Question to you numb dumbs , how many got infected in treatment arm vs placebo arm ?
What is your position in excess deaths?
He’s talked in numerous videos about the fact that excess deaths were the result of COVID and were reduced by vaccination
Great video! Love the long form, point by point format. Best video you've put out so far.
That sheep talks!
@@Lp78Ch Wow, way to display your ignorance and inability to communicate as an adult. Does your mom & dad know you're up this late?
@@lufcharrison2234says the ignorant bashing sheep who simply follows a different shepherd.
Thank you!
Watching bored millionaires like Musk , Rogan and Kennedy trying to turn science and Healthcare into a spectator bloodsport makes my blood boil.
Thanks so much for your tenacity and bravery in continuing to debunk their BS .
We ALL need to do our bit to help and it's so helpful that you explain the FACTS and the science so clearly .
Great editing also !
Well said!
Actual science is abrasive and confrontational. If you want your information to lull you to sleep, go participate in religion.
@@jonnovak6856...no? What the hell kind of science are you falling for?
@iamjustkiwi I think maybe he once got given a chemistry set for Xmas and blew up his parents house ... now he expects all science-y stuff to be packed full of drama .
Or maybe just a short attention span... who knows
@@wsouthey8606 seriously! For some reason a lot of people seem to correlate the "excitement" of something with it's legitimacy but in the real world, a lot of facts and research are just kinda dull
Joe Rogan is asking questions. He's not a propagandaist or somebody pedaling disinformation for profit he has an inquisitive mind and he's asking questions and that's what science looks like. I'm sure he would happily have you on the podcast. The reason people like Joe Rogan so much is because he's willing to question things and he follows truth. And then he questions "the truth" and then he brings on guests that have questions about "the truth." That's what science looks like. We are currently living through an opioid crisis caused by the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA lying. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people dead because pharmaceutical companies and the FDA lied. I think it's perfectly fine to be skeptical of the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA. Don't you?
why did Joe Rogan not question anything RFKjr said?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Why did Bayer infect thousand with HIV leading to thousands of AIDS deaths in France, Spain, Latin America and Asia by dumping a drug the FDA withdrew from the US market in those countries.
Why did the US government conspire with Bayer to allow it to happen?
And why was no one charged or held responsible for those sacrifices to Moloch?
Finally: Whose responsibe for more deaths directly attributed to peddling false medical information..... FRK Jr or those Rotund Farmers you shill for.
@@MessiahNonEst nice attempt at irrelevant deflection. That's all you've got now, isn't it?
@@NonFlyiingDutchman Sorry I forgot you don't like looking in the mirror of scientism.
Question: Why should Joe Rogan have questioned anything RFK said. Because you think RFK is lying when he claimed no placebo trials have been conducted.
Is that all you got for a three hour video you haven't watched, you took on faith what dr flunky debunky to you to believe.
@@MessiahNonEst It's a clear example of RFKjr lying, ergo, he lies.
Are any of the funding sources of the papers you reference a conflict of interest in their findings?
And funding sources for the production of this channel?
@@philo3479hahah funding sources for a dude in his office?
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Genuine question about the two different types of mercury. RFK did say that studies showed ethyl mercury does not accumulate in the blood, but also in the only study of it's kind for obvious ethical reasons when I forget which species of primates were subject to a post-mortem examination they found that ethanol Mercury had accumulated in the brain. Are you aware of the study?
Also, as a social scientist, I might point out to you that it's worth at least acknowledging the misplaced influence that vested interest like corporate and state power can have on the conduct research and findings of science. That doesn't mean that of course all studies are not valid but especially when we are talking about fields of science in which there are very powerful vested interests and huge concentrations of economic and political power, it's worth at least acknowledging this as a potential variable. E.g, on which studies get funded and commissioned and which don't which studies can be subject to manipulations and fraud of various kinds which are not flagged because of corporate capture of the very institutions that are supposed to scrutinise these studies.
I say this, because the tone and register that you adopt when you speak in these videos sounds like it presupposes the incontestable and unquestioning authority of 'the' science. For instance when you talk about scientists who ask questions for a living.
The fields of philosophy of science as well as the Sociology of science and the history of science re contextualize the practise of science within its broader social milieu. I think as a molecular biologist, you don't take these factors into account.
Peter Hotez and his role is a case in point. During the pandemic he issued pronouncements and proclamations that used a framing and discourse that assumed the science was incontestable.
He proclaimed certainties such as covid vaccines preventing transmission or requiring only one dose, which we now know not to be true. Of course, the facts change and all knowledge is provisional, and so scientists are entitled to change their minds, but that is not the framing or the subtext of his contributions to public discourse.
The framing was that I am issuing proclamations and decrees that are certainties and anyone that dissents is ignorant and even dangerous.
In this sense we can see science or scientism functioning as a political authority or a form of disciplinary power as the French sociologist Michel Foucault described it. In other words, the scientific authorities establish certain social norms and standards which we must adhere to. And certain technologies which are used to surveil us ensure that we are following them and if we not we are then punished. I'd recommend if you haven't read it all ready Foucault's Discipline and Punish.
Another example of this is the whole controversy around ivermectin. Now you say that it has been thoroughly studied, although there is still a question over whether a truly large randomized controlled study with a big enough sample size has actually been done; I understand that one of the discoverers of ivermectin offered Merc the opportunity to do this and they turned it down, probably because it's not profitable. But putting that issue to one side, you will also be aware that we were repeatedly told through the mainstream corporate news outlets starts ivermectin is simply a drug for horses. No doubt you know that's not true and in fact is used to kill parasitic worms in humans as well. But instead scientific figures were mobilised to promulgate this discourse that it is only four horses and anyone that thinks otherwise is an idiot.
This is not how science in my opinion should proceed and is in fact highly damaging to the scientific endeavour, it's reputation and the trust that people hold in it.
Also, how do you know he's lying? He may be incorrect but to argue someone is lying presupposes knowledge of their intentions, and as a scientist I'm assuming you don't believe in telepathy, unless you have hard evidence that he is wilfully misleading the public.
@@martincrook8702 he is lying because he has been corrected many a times .
Also the studies are by academia . Your rant does not apply . The monkey study you are talking about is Burbacher study . You should actually read the study and you will find he even misrepresents that . There are several on the subject . Also why ignore multiple other studies that clearly show vaccine has zero to with autism . Now that autism is even better understood . Any body who knows biology of autism knows vaccine has zero to do with it - so studies on autism itself defy vaccine as cause . RFK jr knows he is lying.
Ivermectin , none that actually know science were very hopeful but the true villains made millions trying to take advantage of peoples misery during a pandemic . It took 100 times the concentration of normal dose to kill virus in kidney cells ( wrong cells only ) as lung cells don’t have channels where ivermectin worked .
Those maligning vaccines have to resort to fist out lying. Why is that ? Look at RFK jr a figure of complete disgrace and an example how lie people can sink . Did he apologize for his hand in the passing of 80 children ? Did he apologize to Dr Offit after letting johnson his family from his lies about the money and his vaccine ? The sane person no wonder writes a plethora of lies about real life super Gerri Dr Fauci
The reason was that actually , animal stores and veterinarians stores was robbed.
Also it was because of an increased tiredness of the conspirasists, to found ANY drugs to use EXCEPT the vaccine.
This is the excuse they used to say that the media was causing mistrust, NO that was the constant attempt to sow distrust in vaccines, using ANY other medicine as long as it was not a vaccine.
It was attempted to try and find something to misdirect at and make suspicious, this time it was the media.
And it was also reported more than just being a horse paste. So its not even true.
It was a deflection and yet another part of the methods to cast suspicion and blame on anyone else.
For example it was said to have won a noble prize, SO WHAT, for treating Covid No!, insulin could have won a noble prize, the first one creating the wheel.
Giving the noble prize to something doesnt make it treat anything.
If you expect that other people have to be completely nice and respectful and understanding and never use humor as people peddle one after another NON-Solution, and will not except a thorough scientific investigation.
We not a team of psychologists, carefully finding a way to not upset people in any way shape of form, especially as they seeked for and embraced casting anything in doubt.
We are all humans, we cannot treat people all the time even if we try as if they have to be nursed and patted on the head and spoken to.
I for example am one that looked into many of these and tried to fight the onslaught of misinformation, the smearing and defaming of good people working hard.
Im not on several social media anymore because the reckless "skepticism" and flood of misinformation has tired me out completely.
And people that tries to even as friendly as possible and with care try to correct information is abused constantly. and the promotion of fraudsters like RFK jr., Weinstenn, Dr. Campbell, and many many more, that fabricates wave after wave and flood of new falsehoods. with NO effort on their part.
And HUGE effort on our part to look into it properly.
Some times we might snap or just not being perfect communicators, sorry about that!
But its a completely unrealistic bar to set.
You sound captured too 😂
"In an e-mail dated 17 December 1999, Verstraeten wrote to Robert Davis and copied Frank DeStefano with the subject line, ‘It just won’t go away’; in the body of the e-mail he wrote that ‘all the harm is done in the first month'"
"Just over two months later, Verstraeten had produced a new draft of the analysis - a thirty page report titled ‘Thimerosal VSD Study, Phase 1. Verstraeten made a number of questionable judgement calls, such as excluding all children who did not receive 2 polio vaccines (which reduced the number of zero exposure patients), combining the zero exposure group with the
"Even then, the relative risk of autism for the highest exposure group (>62.5 µg) was 2.48. On 19 March 2000, Verstraeten e-mailed DeStefano to explain that he had run a separate analysis on 10 premature infants from Northern California Kaiser and found that the highest exposure group had a relative risk of developing autism of 5.0 finding of an OR of 5.4 for premature"
"As for the name: state treasurers, sheriffs, and other nonrelatives around the country who happen to have the name Kennedy get uniformly large votes, usually through no demonstrable virtues of their own. John Kennedy is a popular President. That is one of the few facts the electorate is aware of. They will always vote for a name they know favorably as opposed to a name they don't know at all. "
"...the attractive Kennedys' aura is that of movie stars rather than that of politicians."
Gore Vidal "The Best Man" Esquire Magazine 1968.
Gore Vidal was right about the Kennedys. They are a brand or how he put it an "image".
RJKjr should visit Dallas.
Thanks for the Vidal quote, would love to know his take on the past several years of political insanity if he was still among us.
Love the T-shirt!!!😍
In the Canadian review paper you cite, if 69% of pediatric encephalitis/encephalopathy cases analysed were not due to vaccination, then 31% of cases analysed WERE due to vaccination?
YIKES !!!
Yeah try again sunshine. "Overall, 40 patients (70.2%) had a more likely alternate cause for their encephalopathy or encephalitis than vaccination. In 9 patients (15.8%), the evidence for a more likely alternate cause was based only on presence of symptoms suggestive of an infective process (e.g., cough, coryza, wheeze, sore throat, diarrhea, and hepatomegaly, in combination or alone) unrelated to vaccination."
"For 3 patients (5.3%), there was evidence for an association with vaccine,"
"The remaining 14 patients (24.6%) classified as indeterminate did not meet criteria for alternative etiology or evidence for association with vaccine;"
So only 3 patients over 21 years were linked to the vaccines.
As there was about 4,891,000 children of the vaccination age by the study in 2001 and about an 87% vaccination rate which would mean that 4,255,170 were vaccinated in that time that would equate to a risk factor of 0.00007%.
Thank you so much for the information. I love how you break it down. We are going through the vaccination schedule with my little one and although we’ve followed it, I had a knot in my stomach the whole time.
One question, RFK mentions in the podcast that when the did the autopsy on the monkeys who were given the same mercury found in vaccines, they found it was not being excreted from in their urine/feces but was making its way and lodging in the brain. Is there any validity to the claim?
As shown from this video you cannot believe a word that comes out of Kenedy's mouth! Make up your own mind.
Thanks for sharing. I’m in the same boat with our first kid and like you, I’ve been so anxious about it and excited to finally find a video that can offer an explanation/argument debunking RFK’s claims because they are downright scary for a new parent
I’m curious about this as well.
@karlweber470 did Kennedy ever share his source, considering he doesn't understand that different formulation of mercury cab be more or less danger or interact differently
He talked about a study, I'd have to go back to the podcast and find it, but yes, he did provide a specific study@@ASH-su6nb
Who still uses Thimiserol? I thought these were removed 20 years ago?
Only in some flu vaccines it is still used.
Multi-dose vials of any vaccine that may not be stored properly. It reduces both fungal and bacterial growth when multiple punctures of the latex seal occur.
Thanks
Conflict of interest.
Sorry in avance for my bad english. I have a question regarding a study that Robert cited, the one where they found the mercury inside the monkies brain. I was hoping you would debunk that one, but you didn't mention it (or maybe I missed it?). Do you have any information about this? Thank you for your work.
He ignored it because he can't debunk it. This video was pathetic
He also repeated the lie that Ethyl Mercury is excreted from the body faster.
@@matthewsands3591It absolutely is. One can merely look at the half life of both, because ethyl decays faster. It takes 10 days for half a given amount of ethyl mercury to decay, wheras it takes 50 days for the same amount of methylmercury to decay. That's 5x as fast. And that's assuming it all accumulates.
@@Skidzo19 that's not true. It's already been established that Ethyl Mercury leaves the blood faster because it goes into the brain, not because it is excreted from the body.
@@matthewsands3591 I actually found this video very interesting and helpful. To be honest I rather be informed by a true scientist than a guy who says that the free market will solve the climate crisis.
I loved your video. I learned more about variants of mercury and ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation. Id love to see you, him, and Rogan or Lex in a room to discuss these topics. +1 to your subscriber pool 😊
ruclips.net/video/rs2Abw0NEBM/видео.html
Lex shouted out this channel before his with RFK, he’d totally facilitate that.
Dr Wilson, there were also 2 more cardiac deaths in the placebo group - myocardial infarction. So the count was 4 v 3
Yes, conveniently ignored by the malicious anti-vaxxers.
Myocardial infarction isn't a death, it's death of some of the heart muscle. But nevertheless, 3 extra deaths is completely insignificant.
@@kevinklassen4328 the two deaths were due to myocardial infarction.
@@kevinklassen4328 it was on the list of deaths though
@kevinklassen4328 extra deaths insignificant. Big claim for a small study there broseph
And this man wants to become President, man oh man
That’s funny. Who’d you vote for in 2020?
Does money influence scientific conclusions?
The conclusions are written on the outside of the envelope, the cash inside. The two are separated by a thin wall of paper: the two are not connected.
In the vast majority of cases, no. Like in all walks of life, there will be unethical people in science also, so I am sure people can point to some examples. But those are the exceptions.
A much bigger problem, but still relatively limited, are implicit biases in people. You'll find that a lot in anti-vax scientists, who create whole narratives and cherry pick 'evidence' to prove their point.
Absolutely 💯
Is this ironic? It sounds like it.
No. Data influence the conclusion. Money helps pay the scientists who have labored through the scientific studies.
Thank you so much for this video, the best I've seen of this type. One observation: you mention at the end that the debate about the causes of Autism have been debated - in journals, at conferences and so forth. This is the beef I have with the medical community and the media too - I WANT TO HEAR THIS FOR MYSELF. I WANT TO SEE THESE PEOPLE ON THE NEWS, IN LONG SEGMENTS, TALKING ABOUT THIS.
Thank you for doing this
Don't thank him. He gets money to do this. Nice conflict of interest.
@Goodmorning1221- so does RFK jr. Lotta exposure helps with the voting crowd.
@@Goodmorning1221-Liar
@@Goodmorning1221-Who pays you to troll your cut-and-paste nonsense on every Wilson video?
Autism isn't a 'disease'.
The brains of people with it, work in a slightly different way to those of the average person.
This fearmongering about autism is extremely irritating for many of those who have the conditon.
yeah they work in a dysfunctional way, it should be prevented in everyone and it shouldnt be glorified
@@artv.9989 Hate speech.
I guess if you had seen it happen to your son you might not buy the propaganda.
@@dougbodaly6930 The anti-vax story time is baseless nonsense from a lot of people with no education in science.
@@dougbodaly6930 I'm autistic, Doug, and no amount of lies from grifters can change the fact that autism is a condition.
straight from the FDA website "The FDA can use its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products, to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases when certain criteria are met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives." Read that last line again. Then read it again Ben. You make it sound like "oh yeah if Ivermectin (or whatever generic, expired patent drug) was shown to work, it could have gotten EUA along side the vaccines and everything else" and clearly that is NOT the case. When you gloss over something like this it makes people question your integrity.
Yeah well Ivernectin still doesn’t work with COVID
@@topologyrobthey screwed up the double blind study, they gave them a choice to take them during the second and third stage of the trial.
What "certain criteria" are they talking about it..
The standard for "emergency use" is not very robust. From the same document: "Medical products that may be considered for an EUA are those that "may be effective" to prevent, diagnose, or treat serious or life-threatening diseases" 'MAY be effective " doesn't mean that it necessarily will BE effective.
I am a first responder. I can say for a fact there are more people with negative effects from the vaccine than people that did not get it.
RFK is a lawyer. He’s not about evidence supporting a conclusion, he’s about pushing a conclusion with lies.
Hey Dr. Wilson. This is my first time on your channel. I watched the kennedy podcast, and have been looking around for info on vaccines since then. To me, the most compelling part of Kennedy’s argument was the Burbacher study. I’m curious why you didn’t think that study was worth addressing. Thanks
What part of the Burbacher report supports RFK’s ideas? I’m genuinely curious, because the parts of the report I read (as a lay person, not a scientist) imply that comparing ethylmercury and methylmercury is like comparing apples to oranges due to their different half-lives in the body (which Dr. Wilson mentioned).
Also, the CDC specifically cites the Burbacher report on its list of resources supporting the safe use of Thimerosal, which seems counterproductive if they are trying to obfuscate the dangers of vaccines.
@@robfinch2359 My very amateur takeaway is that ethylMercury stays in the blood a long time and that methylMercury does NOT stay in the blood a long time.
Those advocating these vaccines as safe use this fact in favor of their case. The methylMercury no longer shows up in the blood tests, so therefore it must have been flushed out and therefore all is well and good.
The Burbacher study is suggesting that while the methlymercury indeed exited the blood, it did NOT exit the body. Rather it lodged into the brain (ugh!).
Same point - methyl mercury found in the brain
After no longer found in the blood -read the study findings!
Why did this doc avoid this study’s findings???
So dangerous to pick and parcel parts of these interviews leaving out details that do not support your narrative
And that are frankly UNTRUE
Also RFK JR is fully vax’d AND has represented parents with kids WITH vax Injuries. SOME PEOPLE ARE GETTING INJURED BY SOME Vax!
Why oh why mandate ‘safe for all’ when that simply is proven over and over NOT TO BE TRUE!
i.e. my own son is severely allergic to an antibiotic that is very common and saves many many lives over many many years!
I am severely allergic to a totally different anti biotic after a terrible reaction in my 20’s
Yes it works so well for others!
This is one of RFK Jr’s points - not all vax are safe for all
Why will no one else speak this truth?
Why will this doc NOT note the huge settlements to families who’s kids were severely injured from vax?
So scary what this doc claims to be debunking
Follow the money
So sad to realize this
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
@@robfinch2359Mercury is The old poisoning except for in flu shots The new blood poisoning is aluminum. Delicious And nutritious yummy. Inject right into your bloodstream by pass all barriers. 👍👍👍 I love you guys your All so smart lol lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ditto
thanks for exposing this clown once again
yeah he doing a great job for his 26k subscribers
@@christophercook9745 And the bulk of whom probably already agree almost totally with him. I think there is a phrase for that? Preaching... or something like that.
@@Benson_Bear confirmation bias
I don't get why RFKjr. is constantly saying,
- he is not anti-vaccine
- he is so open and looking to search out the best and latest science
- "show me where I'm wrong"
What does he say to these very obvious criticisms of his words?
he's been shown where he's wrong so many times but just carries on as if nothing happened and continues spouting lies. Case in point: he claims (as you can see in this video) that vaccines don't undergo place-controlled clinical studies but you can look at the covid vaccine clinical trials that are published online and see that they are place-controlled using saline. He relies on his followers being too stupid to even check I guess.
RFK enjoys lying
@@Sceince007
Yeah he does!
*_"Vineland, NJ - 33 year old Nadia Chubok returned from a routine night shift as a medical professional lay down to sleep and did not wake up. She died suddenly on July 7, 2023, leaving behind 2 orphaned kids age 4 and 11"_*
Very good again.
Thank you for this ❤
It’s so hard for me to understand how our society worked so hard and made so much progress in the field of medicine that saved millions of lives and now we are witnessing an exact reversal of those hard-earned achievements which is increasingly putting our society at a grave risk.
Greed and corruption. I am in the field and those of us which remain true to our Oaths are disgusted.
@@philo3479 Hey Philo3479. You wrote the Hep B approval trial "had 147 subjects safety tested for 5 days with no placebo control."
Because when I looked Energix-B, had 6100 people in 58 clinical studies in 19 countries between 1984 - 1986, and was approved in 1989. It's still used. So I get the idea you made that up. *Can you explain what you wrote, perhaps name the study?*
@@Muritaipet every response I wrote has been deleted. So either you, or Dr. Self Debunk does not want people to see what is indisputable proof. It is listed on the FDA web site. RECOMBIVAX is the one that is being given to 1 day babies, including all my kids.
@@Muritaipet Engerix-B on the other hand did have over 5K subjects in the FDA trial BUT, the safety trial was for………….drum roll…………………4days.
@@philo3479 Dude. WTF are you talking about? *It was either a 3 or a 4 dose trial.* You appear to be randomly making stuff up.
"Summary of clinical findings on Engerix-B, a genetically engineered yeast derived hepatitis B vaccine.
Between February 1984 and August 1986 results have been obtained in 58 completed or ongoing clinical studies by 33 investigators in 19 countries on a yeast-derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B). Among the 6100 subjects enrolled in these studies, 5664 subjects (150 normal neonates, 178 neonates of hepatitis B carrier mothers, 330 children aged 3-10 years, 3697 young healthy adults, 438 homosexual males, 110 older healthy adults, 139 drug addicts, 262 institutionalized mentally retarded patients, 59 thalassaemics, 25 sicklaemics, 270 patients on chronic haemodialysis and 6 haemophiliacs) received one or more (up to 4) injections of different doses of the yeast-derived vaccine according to either a 0, 1, 2, and 12 month or a 0, 1, and 6 month vaccination schedule."
*Edit: And it seems to me you are misreporting the RECOMBIVAX HB trials. Even the package insert says.....*
"In three clinical studies, 434 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 5 mcg, were administered to *147 healthy infants and children* (up to 10 years of age) who were monitored for *5 days after each dose."*
and
"In a group of studies, 3258 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 10 mcg, *were administered to 1252 healthy adults* who were *monitored for 5 days after each dose."*
There is this also this article from 1985
"MERCK's RECOMBIVAX HB DNA-DERIVED HEPATITIS VACCINE APPROVED JUNE 23 AFTER FIVE-MONTH REVIEW; MERCK WILL BEGIN MARKETING IN JANUARY"
*That indicates it was trialed on 3000+ people before it was approved*
It's important to note, people who use "science" and "I am doctor" or maybe "I agree with the science", should be treated with scepticism. Just from the description you can tell this guy is a "follow the government guidelines" kind of person. He either has to believe what he's saying, which means he's about as knowledgeable as you, but he read a book, or he's a grifter. I suspect a person who trust authority figures and will "listen and believes".
If he's so confident, then he should debunk Stefan Lanka's work on virology methodologies. This guys either not very wise or a shill.
Thank you so much for this. I will share.
Thank you for posting your thoughts. Would you be willing to discuss the issues with RFK Jr. on Rogan?
Why should an actual scientist waste his time debating bro-sci idiots?
And give them some kind of validity? That’s how misinformation gets worse.
Maybe he would, but Rogan has already rejected the many others who have offered to take Hotez' place. Because as we know, this isn't about the debate, it is knowing that Hotez can be flustered in the face of an onslaught of misinformation.
Exactly why should this ignorant clown RFK jr be given a platform ? Have you ever seen him not lie or spew ignorance ?
@@Marco-it2mr thank you for responding. From my perspective, the reason to explore and discuss (vs. debate) with him is to shed light on the issue for us lay people. Rather than take on an adversarial position, which we typically find in debate and argument, knowledgeable people like yourself can discuss such topics with people like RFK, to enrich perspectives for others. I appreciate that you have your podcast to bring others into the conversation as viewers. That said, I for one, would benefit from an expanded dialogue with yourself and others with different perspectives. A good reference to this methodology is “Six Thinking Hats” by Edward di Bono…. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Thinking_Hats
I know this must be exhausting but you are doing important crucial work explaining this stuff.
Unfortunately I think your knowledge will be needed a whole lot more in the coming years.
Thank You
😂
He's lying
@@lar7922 people are too lazy to read through the studies in good faith and realize none of them counter the points of RFK. They're just here for their confirmation bias.
Yeah, with things like ignoring all the excess deaths? This channel is for all the jab heads too find some false sense of security
He's wrong
Great video. Thank you.
Wow, Kennedy doesn’t understand mercury. Or, for that matter, how science is done.
He doesn't understand these either
-malignant narcissism
-Dunning Kruger
-conspiracy theories
-critical thinking > cynical thinking
-the scientific method & falsification
-the difference between peer reviewed and a pre print
-difference between retrospective and prospective studies
-association is not necessarily causation
-virology
-epidemiology
-microbiology
-organic chemistry
-proteins and folding
-epistemology
-logic and constructing an argument
-logical fallacies
-cognitive biases
-Occams razor
-Hanlons razor
-Hitchens razor
-Brandolini's law/bullshit asymmetry
-sea lioning
.....is also be very hard to do.
When they took mercury out of vaccines the antivax grifters started blaming Aluminium instead. 'Aluminium builds up in your body and causes autism'.... oh really? Tell me how much there is in a vaccine compared to the antiperspirant you use every single day...
I doubt Kennedy is mentally equipped to understand anything at all. Single digit IQ shows...
True! We can observe that Science is done by spending money on PR until people take your drug.
Then there’s science, which is done by disproving hypotheses. In other words scientists are attracted to counter truths that expand their model of reality.
Zealots on the other hand are afraid of counter truths that threaten their position.
Kennedy, to my mind, was just asking questions and trying to publicize documents and studies. I really don't see the issue. He has never said Vaccines don't work or that people shouldn't take them. He wants people to be informed and to be safe.
Joe’s show is really tedious
Keep up the good work
Baaaaa 🐑
“That’s for my false sense of security, doc. Same time next week? 😵💫”
Great work!
Thanks so much😊
Of course you are 100% correct. None of what you mentioned requires one to have a PhD to understand or debate. Only a willingness to think for oneself and apply that pesky old scientific method of "question everything". The c*vid drones however are either in a hypnotic trance or brainwashed. Some may know the jig is up but I suspect that is wishful thinking.
Well shit. Thanks again.