The more i know about systemd the more impressed I get... This guys knows how to scratch the iches of sysadmins and distribution maintainers... no wonder systemd is being adoped left and right. The final user might not get it.. but big companies are all about services. And services are first class citizens on systemd
if you start by saying "tar up an entire OS tree" means that you don't understand containers kid. if you wanna pack an entire OS you use a virtual machine (vbox, qemu), not a container. Containers just contain a minimum tree of files you want to provide to a user while limiting access to the rest of the system.
You don't run systemd on Linux. Systemd replaces Linux. Just like you don't run emacs on Linux. Emacs replaces it. Perfect examples of the anti-unix philosophy. But in this case I actually like this feature of that all encompassing impossible to avoid God "demon".
the huge irony of this comment is that this clown is on another video claiming he loves systemd-spawn, 🤣🤣🤣 you are just a poser, a virtue signaler, "look everyone I belong to the UNIX tribe, please accept me and love me because I'm so insecure" 🤣🤣🤣
@@foljs5858 it is pointless because we already had containers without containers managers, is called chroot and vservers. have you seen all these web hosting companies that have been around for 20 years that say "get your server with wordpress ready for 1 dollar" well, those companies are using vservers. Is also pointless because now this clown of Lennart is adding container manager under the umbrella of systemd but he is saying "containers without container managers" is just clickbait for the mindless and guillible people like you who fall for the systemd meme.
![[ENG] Christoph Hellwig: "Failure-Atomic file updates for Linux"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FmF9VNEhUrg/mqdefault.jpg)
![[ENG] Christoph Hellwig: "Failure-Atomic file updates for Linux"](/img/tr.png)
The more i know about systemd the more impressed I get...
This guys knows how to scratch the iches of sysadmins and distribution maintainers... no wonder systemd is being adoped left and right.
The final user might not get it..
but big companies are all about services. And services are first class citizens on systemd
this merges container and service management into 1 cohesive system. Bravo Lennart.
if you start by saying "tar up an entire OS tree" means that you don't understand containers kid. if you wanna pack an entire OS you use a virtual machine (vbox, qemu), not a container. Containers just contain a minimum tree of files you want to provide to a user while limiting access to the rest of the system.
You don't run systemd on Linux. Systemd replaces Linux. Just like you don't run emacs on Linux. Emacs replaces it. Perfect examples of the anti-unix philosophy.
But in this case I actually like this feature of that all encompassing impossible to avoid God "demon".
tell me you have no idea about software without telling me you have no idea about software.
the huge irony of this comment is that this clown is on another video claiming he loves systemd-spawn, 🤣🤣🤣 you are just a poser, a virtue signaler, "look everyone I belong to the UNIX tribe, please accept me and love me because I'm so insecure" 🤣🤣🤣
What a pity! So much effort in developement for such a pointless nonsense...
So like your content free comment?
@@foljs5858 it is pointless because we already had containers without containers managers, is called chroot and vservers. have you seen all these web hosting companies that have been around for 20 years that say "get your server with wordpress ready for 1 dollar" well, those companies are using vservers.
Is also pointless because now this clown of Lennart is adding container manager under the umbrella of systemd but he is saying "containers without container managers" is just clickbait for the mindless and guillible people like you who fall for the systemd meme.