Have you emailed Professor Dave yet? He's waiting for you to contact him and will debate you in London... and send him the dosh so he can go visit.. and you can show him around London. I'll get a ticket to watch it, if i can, it'll be brill. (If you have already emailed him.. then apologies)
@@JazzyArtKL In regards to the other comment you left, where you showed that you have no clue what a burden of proof is, I have made a community post just for you, sweetheart. It's similar to the definitions you conveniently overlooked in your other comment. Thanks for playing!
Debate professor Dave. You called him out, he said he’d happily do it. Quit acting confident in front of your audience if you have no intention on following through with your words.
Do you understand that it takes time to make debate terms etc ? Don't worry your evolutionist kido will lose the debate and return quickly to his mouse cave 😂
Well you've given yourself the huge burden now of proving existence was designed in the first place, bearing in mind complexity doesn't mean something was designed. And... go!
@@snakejuce the denial of an assertion carries no burden, especially when that assertion came with literally zero evidence. If you don't know how burden of proof works you shouldn't be commenting in public on anything.
@@BubbaF0wpend How are you still repeating this lie in 2024? How disingenuous are you 🤡s? For your edification, since your last two functioning brain cells haven't yet figured it out: - *Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011)* : “‘Atheism’ means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God.” - *Encyclopedia of Unbelief (2007)* , p. 88: “In its broadest sense atheism, from the Greek a (‘without’) and theos (‘deity’), standardly refers to the denial of the existence of any god or gods.” - *Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2nd ed. (2006)* , p.358 [in vol. 1 of 10]: “According to the most usual definition, an _atheist_ is a person who maintains that there is no God, that is, that the sentence ‘God exists’ expresses a false proposition. In contrast, an agnostic maintains that it is not known or cannot be known whether there is a God” - *Oxford Companion to Philosophy, New Ed. (2005)* , p. 65: “Atheism is ostensibly the doctrine that there is no God. Some atheists support this claim by arguments. But these arguments are usually directed against the Christian concept of God, ... Agnosticism may be strictly personal and confessional-‘I have no firm belief about God’-or it may be the more ambitious claim that no one ought to have a positive belief for or against the divine existence.” - *Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy (2004)* , p. 530: “The belief that God - especially a personal, omniscient, omnipotent, benevolent God - does not exist.” - **Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1998)**, entry by William Rowe: “As commonly understood, atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. So an atheist is someone who disbelieves in God, whereas a theist is someone who believes in God. … the common use of ‘atheism’ to mean disbelief in God is so thoroughly entrenched, we will follow it. We may use the term ‘non-theist’ to characterize the position of the negative atheist.”
@@speciesspeciate6429 A stepwise adaptive path and time and probabilistic resources for the path to be traversed are absolutely necessary for Neo Darwinism Evolution to have occurred. Yet these 2 things yet to be demonstrated for any significant transition. Bacteria r genetic workhorses for evolutionary research for their rapid adaptation as long it takes 2 mutations. But for our enzymes to evolve it would take atleast 7 and probably many more mutations. And the waiting tym is approx 10 octillion yrs. But universe is 10^10 years. So, it can't have happened. Any attempts to convert proteins to genuinely new functions typically require 8 or more mutations, which is well beyond reach of Neo Darwinism processes. So next tym research well and then comment. Everybody commenting here is not stupid. Get the message??!
@@speciesspeciate6429we see variations within species were are your prove of speciation? And if it happen where is the evidence that it's responsible for all of what we see
@@snakejucecorrection "Suboor said he was challenging Dave but didn't actually contact Dave hoping he wouldn't see it. Dave saw it and has accepted it but Suboor is too much of a pussy to do it".
I understand you invited Prof Dave to London for a debate about evolution but so far have failed to contact him after he released a video saying he would interested. Why haven't you contacted him? Are you scared? Did you realize your mistake? Do you not want to be made a fool of live?
You said you are going to fly Professor Dave to you and pay for his hotel so you can debate him? You gave your word didn’t you? You are a man of your word aren’t you?
His books that haven't been peer reviewed? We literally observed the evolution of irreducible complex traits. But then I know you're just trying to justify your own pre determined beliefs.
@@MrJimiJK His books haven't been peer reviewed, because that's not how academic peer review works. He didn't publish any articles in respectable scientific journals, because they would be put through peer review scrutiny. Instead publishes books for lay people (science illiterate) to ooh and aww his religious audience. Provide me one link to Behe's scientific publications that were peer reviewed.
@@speciesspeciate6429 Yes, evolution cannot happen, not only because there is no evidence of evolution in the fossil record, but also because there are many things that disprove the theory, such as the fossil record, the Cambrian explosion, and the genetic minimum.
@@speciesspeciate6429 Yes, irreducible complexity is a big problem, and Darwin also talked about it, but let us be frank, with the development of science and seeing the extent of the complexity of the cell, which at the time of Darwin was seen as something very simple, a big problem. if Darwin had been alive and known all this, he would have been Abandon the theory. He was a deist and not an atheist anyway
You don't even have a science degree and you're trying to talk about this stuff... you have no idea what you're in for with this prof dave debate HAHAHAHA
Thanks for inviting such an interesting guest like Prof Behe. During my biology study i found an even fundamental irreducable complexity. There is no reasonable solution for how all needed parts for gene expression came into existence to make this process work.
Hey great news! Professor Dave has accepted your debate challenge. We'll get to see him destroy you live in London. Please contact him and arrange a date
You've already started your childish "us vs them" dynamic while fanboying someone who has no idea who you even are. Chill your ego a bit, you're not that important, nor is your prophet Dave.
@@Barneybriz951 Nah nah , it's Truth ( Islam) vs Modern Paganism.😂😂😂 By the way you are one of them and Subboor have that much knowledge that he can piss on you intellectually 😂😂😂. So , piss off you school boy 😂
@@snakejuce Subboor started the dichotomy by attacking science, then challenging Dave to a debate. My ego isn't involved. Dave isn't a prophet. The entire question is the science that Sub attacks, without having any actual knowledge of science. It really isn't about personalities, it's about facts. Please encourage Sub to defend his words or withdraw them.
@@Ab_Def_ Why must you be disingenuous. "HE IS ATTACKING SCIENCE AS A WHOLE." No he is not, and was not. At least be honest in your discourse. Him criticizing specific parts of the narrative that claims to be "scientific" doesn't amount to "OMG SUBBOOR IS ATTACKING ALL OF SCIENCE." Are you seriously so facile that you think Muslims don't respect science? Wth are you on about?
I have come across cultural Muslims in my own circles who believe in the types of Richard Dawkins. The books from Michael Behe are indispensable resources for those who engage with atheists. I first read Evolution Deceit from Harun Yahya, since then I latched on to this subject. Please also Michael Denton
how many fanboys does this Dave guy actually have like seriously so many of you and probably all brainless sheep worshipping this high school professor behave yourself please
Yeah cause your magic invocation of "natural selection did it" for every single biological feature without ever providing a plausible detailed pathway isn't bs at all
@@fab03102its always the same with evolutionists they bark a lot and behave arrogantly but when you really dig deeper you see that its just their religion with all kinds of philosophical assumptions and dogmas behind it
@@fab03102 Wrong. Natural selection doesn't actually cause the development of a biological feature, rather, it leads to shifts in demographics that favour certain traits depending on the environment. The actual driving force behind the development of physical traits in organisms is mutation. This is 9th-grade biology, please read a book.
Methodological naturalism is used because we dont have a way to test the supernatural. If a way is found, Id be more than willing to allow other epistemic ideas in science. However just saying that methodological naturalism is some prohibited in science without reason is not exactly the truth.
Subboor actually just challenged that little fart prof dave (he's not a professor btw). Watch him chicken out. I hope he doesn't though as I'd like to see him getting exposed as the blind follower of philosophical materialism that he is.
@@admiralzero2685 naa I believe science I believe Darwin you know one of the best scientists in human history he doesn’t believe Darwin he doesn’t believe in science he’s batshit crazy
انَا اختكمَ مَن اليمَن وّالَلَه ماتكلمتَ الَا من جوّع وًّمَنَ ضَيَقَ الَحَالَ انَا وًّامَيَ وًّاخَوًّتَيَ تَشَرَدَنَا مَنَ بَيَوًّتَنَا بَسَبَبَ الَحَرَبَ نَحَنَ فَيَ حَالَهَ لَايَعَلَمَ بَهَا الَا الَلَهَ حَسَبَنَا الَلَهَ وًّنَعَمَ الَوكيَلَ فَيَ مَنَ اوًّصَلَنَا الَى هَاذا الَحَالَ 💔💔وًّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ مَا كتَبَتَ هَذا الَمَنَاشَدَهَ غَيَرَ مَنَ الَضَيَقَ وّالَفَقَر يَاعَالَمَ حَسَوّا فَيَنَا ارَجَوّكمَ وّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ رَبَ الَعَرَشَ الَعَظَيَمَ انَه الَاكلَ مَا فَيَ عَنَدَيَ بَالَبَيَتَ وًّالَلَهَ يَا اخَوّانَيَ انَهَ اخَوًّنَيَ بَقَعَدَوًّ بَالَيَوًّمَيَنَ مَافَى اكلَ وًّالَلَهَ وًّضَعَنَا كثَيَرَ صَعَبَ نَحَنَ 4 نَفَرَ دَاخَلَ الَبَيَتَ وًّابَيَ مَتَوًّفَيَ وًّلَا يَوًّجَدَ مَنَ يَعَوًّلَ عَلَيَنَا وًّسَاكنَيَنَ فَيَ بَيَتَ اجَارَ لَانَسَتَطَيَعَ دَفَعَ الَاجَارَ الَلَيَ بَاقَيَ عَلَيَنَا ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' اخي اول كلامي انا اقسم بالله على كتاب الله اني لااكذب عليك ولا انصب ولا احتال اني بنت يمنيه نازحين من الحرب انا واسرتي بيننا ایت الشهرب 20 الف يمني والان علينا 60 الف حق 3 شهور وصاحب البيت من الناس الي ماترحم والله يا اخي انه يجي كل يوم يبهدلنا ويتكلم علينا ويريد من البيت للشارع لانناماقدرنا ندفعله الأجار شافونا الجيران نبكي ورجعو تكلمو الجيران ومهلنالاخره الأسبوع معادفعنا له حلف يمين بالله هذا بيخرجنا إلى الشارع رحمه واحنا. بلادنا بسبب هذا الحرب ولانجد قوت يومنا وعايشين اناوامي واخوتي سفار والدنا متوفي الله يرحمه ومامعنا أحد في هذا الدنيا جاانبنا في هذه الظروف القاسيه اخوتي الصغار خرجو للشارع وشافو الجيران ياكلو واوقفو عند بابهم لجل يعطوهم ولو كسره خبز والله الذي له ملك السموات والارض انهم غلفو الباب وطردوهم ورجعو یبکو ایموتو من الجوع ما احد رحمهم وعطلة ردها لقمت عیش والان لوما احدنا ساعدنا في إيكيلو دقيق اقسم بالله انموت من الجوع فيا اخي انا دخيله على الله ثم عليك واريد منك المساعده لوجه الله انشدك بالله تحب الخير واتساعدني ولو ب 500 ريال يمني مع تراسلي واتساب على هذا الرقم 00967717354582 وتطلب اسم بطاقتي وترسلي ولاتتاخر وايعوضك الله بكل خير اخواني سغار شوف كيف حالتهم وساعدنا وأنقذنا قبل أن يطردونا في الشارع تتبهدل أو نموت من الجوع وانا واسرتي نسالك بالله لولك مقدره على مساعد لاتتاخر علينا وجزاك الله خيرا،.،.،:^:؛^:;";""💔😢😭)/))))/)🎉🎉😢😢😢😊😢😢😊😢😊😢😢
Fanboys of the "Non" Professor Dave crying for the debate with subbor 😂 you dont understand that it take time and there must be rules to keep the debate moderated because your evolutionist kido always use sneaky debate tactics
"Sneaky debate tactics" Like what? Asking for it to be available to both parties uncut and unedited? Asking for it to be moderated by a neutral 3rd party? Asking that any supporting documents be provided to both debaters prior to the event? Asking for claims to be backed up by empirical data? Which of these are "sneaky"?
Depends on the individual and hidaya comes from God. Dr Keith Moore and other renowned scholars have embraced islam. Make Dua if you are really concerned. May Allah guide professor Mike Behe and us all Ameen
You do realize evolution can be observed in both the lab and field, right? You understand that you, with just a small amount of training, and personally observe evolution, right?
@googleenjoyer1503 I'm going to go even further and guess that you can't properly define "species" along with being unable to define "evolution". Go ahead, try. Prove me wrong. Prove you understand what a species is.
Professor Dave accepted the challenge. It's your move now
Please debate Professor Dave. You've challeged him; he's accepted; your honor is at stake. You're not a coward, are you?
Subboor will be absolutely annihilated lmfao
@@Nxck2440Yeah laugh now cuz you’ll cry later
Easy w for Suboor
There’s a reason 99% of biologists agree with Dave’s position and only fringe religious apologists agree with Subboor.
@@optikal5760 pulling numbers out the ass just like the theory ahh
Have you emailed Professor Dave yet? He's waiting for you to contact him and will debate you in London... and send him the dosh so he can go visit.. and you can show him around London. I'll get a ticket to watch it, if i can, it'll be brill. (If you have already emailed him.. then apologies)
Mr.subhoor-Dave's waiting!😂
Omg, is that Behe in the flesh?! Awesome guy. Nice guest list Subboor.
Nice creationist echo chamber. Sabboor should actually invite Prof.Dave.
@@JazzyArtKL In regards to the other comment you left, where you showed that you have no clue what a burden of proof is, I have made a community post just for you, sweetheart.
It's similar to the definitions you conveniently overlooked in your other comment. Thanks for playing!
Amazing discussion, thank you prof. Michael behe , jazak Allah khair brother Subboor.
Debate professor Dave. You called him out, he said he’d happily do it. Quit acting confident in front of your audience if you have no intention on following through with your words.
Do you understand that it takes time to make debate terms etc ? Don't worry your evolutionist kido will lose the debate and return quickly to his mouse cave 😂
@@squidproxy136 it has been over a month and Dave has not been contacted once...
@@OvalEclipseThe debate was accepted a day ago.
@@OvalEclipse evolutionist lie so much ?, I guess so
@@OvalEclipse😂😂😂😂 it was yesterday
It's very simple: To deny The Designer is to deny the design.
There is no bigger hypocrisy than that which denies the very reality that is.
Well you've given yourself the huge burden now of proving existence was designed in the first place, bearing in mind complexity doesn't mean something was designed.
And... go!
Subboor is the only one denying anything. He's denying 150 years of science. Of knowledge gained by studying the world around us.
@@BubbaF0wpend The denial of the proposition "God exists" also places the burden of proof on the "atheist," or anti-theist.
And... go!
@@snakejuce the denial of an assertion carries no burden, especially when that assertion came with literally zero evidence. If you don't know how burden of proof works you shouldn't be commenting in public on anything.
@@BubbaF0wpend How are you still repeating this lie in 2024? How disingenuous are you 🤡s?
For your edification, since your last two functioning brain cells haven't yet figured it out:
- *Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011)* : “‘Atheism’ means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God.”
- *Encyclopedia of Unbelief (2007)* , p. 88: “In its broadest sense atheism, from the Greek a (‘without’) and theos (‘deity’), standardly refers to the denial of the existence of any god or gods.”
- *Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2nd ed. (2006)* , p.358 [in vol. 1 of 10]: “According to the most usual definition, an _atheist_ is a person who maintains that there is no God, that is, that the sentence ‘God exists’ expresses a false proposition. In contrast, an agnostic maintains that it is not known or cannot be known whether there is a God”
- *Oxford Companion to Philosophy, New Ed. (2005)* , p. 65: “Atheism is ostensibly the doctrine that there is no God. Some atheists support this claim by arguments. But these arguments are usually directed against the Christian concept of God, ... Agnosticism may be strictly personal and confessional-‘I have no firm belief about God’-or it may be the more ambitious claim that no one ought to have a positive belief for or against the divine existence.”
- *Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy (2004)* , p. 530: “The belief that God - especially a personal, omniscient, omnipotent, benevolent God - does not exist.”
- **Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1998)**, entry by William Rowe: “As commonly understood, atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. So an atheist is someone who disbelieves in God, whereas a theist is someone who believes in God. … the common use of ‘atheism’ to mean disbelief in God is so thoroughly entrenched, we will follow it. We may use the term ‘non-theist’ to characterize the position of the negative atheist.”
Wow, didn't expect Mike Behe on this channel
Really?
Professor Dave is waiting for you! Come on boy...
Last 5 minutes was very important for grassroot level work, especially parent educating kids on Darwinism and Evolution.
@@speciesspeciate6429 A stepwise adaptive path and time and probabilistic resources for the path to be traversed are absolutely necessary for Neo Darwinism Evolution to have occurred. Yet these 2 things yet to be demonstrated for any significant transition. Bacteria r genetic workhorses for evolutionary research for their rapid adaptation as long it takes 2 mutations. But for our enzymes to evolve it would take atleast 7 and probably many more mutations. And the waiting tym is approx 10 octillion yrs. But universe is 10^10 years. So, it can't have happened. Any attempts to convert proteins to genuinely new functions typically require 8 or more mutations, which is well beyond reach of Neo Darwinism processes.
So next tym research well and then comment. Everybody commenting here is not stupid. Get the message??!
@@speciesspeciate6429we see variations within species were are your prove of speciation? And if it happen where is the evidence that it's responsible for all of what we see
When is the debate with Professor Dave?.... 😅
Was that a thing Subboor and Dave talked about happening in the near future? Or is it ur idea? Wouldn't be a bad idea.
@@snakejuce Subboor challenged him
@@ishmammohammadadnan1525 Ah okay, thanks.
@@snakejucecorrection "Suboor said he was challenging Dave but didn't actually contact Dave hoping he wouldn't see it. Dave saw it and has accepted it but Suboor is too much of a pussy to do it".
@@snakejuce .. Subboor not only challenged him, but offered to pay for Daves travel expenses.
I understand you invited Prof Dave to London for a debate about evolution but so far have failed to contact him after he released a video saying he would interested.
Why haven't you contacted him?
Are you scared?
Did you realize your mistake?
Do you not want to be made a fool of live?
It’s just been 13 hrs, people have stuff to do, unlike Dave and his followers
@@ishmammohammadadnan1525
LOL
You and I both know Subboor is a chickenshit coward who won't actually pay for Professor Dave to travel to London.
@@ishmammohammadadnan1525way enough time to send an email come on now 😂 it's been 3 days now 🧐
@@ishmammohammadadnan1525 7 days and 13hrs!
@@ishmammohammadadnan1525 week and a half now
Very good discussion. Thank you all.
You said you are going to fly Professor Dave to you and pay for his hotel so you can debate him? You gave your word didn’t you? You are a man of your word aren’t you?
great discussion👍
Welcome Michael Behe, I have read and benefited from your books and I hope you keep writing more even though it it's not an easy task.
His books that haven't been peer reviewed?
We literally observed the evolution of irreducible complex traits.
But then I know you're just trying to justify your own pre determined beliefs.
@@MrJimiJKwhere?
@@MrJimiJK His books haven't been peer reviewed, because that's not how academic peer review works. He didn't publish any articles in respectable scientific journals, because they would be put through peer review scrutiny. Instead publishes books for lay people (science illiterate) to ooh and aww his religious audience. Provide me one link to Behe's scientific publications that were peer reviewed.
Professor Dave did a video on Michael Behe about a year ago, debunks his claims with actual science.
Give me one example of Behi lying
@@speciesspeciate6429 Of course he is right. I did not ask you about his beliefs, but rather I asked you about where Behi lied to his followers
@@speciesspeciate6429 Yes, evolution cannot happen, not only because there is no evidence of evolution in the fossil record, but also because there are many things that disprove the theory, such as the fossil record, the Cambrian explosion, and the genetic minimum.
@@speciesspeciate6429 Yes, irreducible complexity is a big problem, and Darwin also talked about it, but let us be frank, with the development of science and seeing the extent of the complexity of the cell, which at the time of Darwin was seen as something very simple, a big problem. if Darwin had been alive and known all this, he would have been Abandon the theory. He was a deist and not an atheist anyway
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Even "the real professors" such as ruse and many others cannot debunk behe's arguments!
You must be a 🤡!
Салам алейкум из Дагестана
Selam aleikum from Germany 🤝🏻
Alejkum salam iz Srbije
You don't even have a science degree and you're trying to talk about this stuff... you have no idea what you're in for with this prof dave debate HAHAHAHA
Is prof dave a prof? Or is that a status he could not reach?
@@WenutzHe is though. He taught chemistry as a professor. You have no clue what you’re talking about and repeating lies that came from flatearthers.
@@Wenutzchemistry professor
@@NoVideoVideos Dave is not a professor
@@qkqk6954 Are you a flat earther?
great discussion, very informative. thank you
The Prophet ﷺ said: ❰ It is also charity to utter a good word. ❱ Riyad as-Salihin 693
Which prophet?
Thanks for inviting such an interesting guest like Prof Behe. During my biology study i found an even fundamental irreducable complexity. There is no reasonable solution for how all needed parts for gene expression came into existence to make this process work.
#Darwin great insight 👍
Min 23:30: 28:20: 37:00: 47:00
Awesome discussion
Great show 🤝🏻
thank you
Hey great news! Professor Dave has accepted your debate challenge. We'll get to see him destroy you live in London.
Please contact him and arrange a date
You've already started your childish "us vs them" dynamic while fanboying someone who has no idea who you even are.
Chill your ego a bit, you're not that important, nor is your prophet Dave.
@@snakejuceit's not "us Vs them" it's right Vs extremists from a evil religion.
@@Barneybriz951 Nah nah , it's Truth ( Islam) vs Modern Paganism.😂😂😂 By the way you are one of them and Subboor have that much knowledge that he can piss on you intellectually 😂😂😂. So , piss off you school boy 😂
@@snakejuce
Subboor started the dichotomy by attacking science, then challenging Dave to a debate.
My ego isn't involved.
Dave isn't a prophet.
The entire question is the science that Sub attacks, without having any actual knowledge of science.
It really isn't about personalities, it's about facts.
Please encourage Sub to defend his words or withdraw them.
@@Ab_Def_ Why must you be disingenuous. "HE IS ATTACKING SCIENCE AS A WHOLE."
No he is not, and was not. At least be honest in your discourse. Him criticizing specific parts of the narrative that claims to be "scientific" doesn't amount to "OMG SUBBOOR IS ATTACKING ALL OF SCIENCE."
Are you seriously so facile that you think Muslims don't respect science? Wth are you on about?
I have come across cultural Muslims in my own circles who believe in the types of Richard Dawkins. The books from Michael Behe are indispensable resources for those who engage with atheists. I first read Evolution Deceit from Harun Yahya, since then I latched on to this subject. Please also Michael Denton
I have all the books of Mike Behe in PDF format.
Behe and Denton are the final bosses of ID, #invitedenton
@@fab03102 can u give me name of the books written by Denton??
@@musafir_responds Evolution: a theory in crisis, Nature's destiny, Evolution: still a theory in crisis are his 3 first books
@@fab03102 Thanks
Professor Dave is waiting for you. Debate him immediately so he can dump on all your bs
how many fanboys does this Dave guy actually have
like seriously
so many of you and probably all brainless sheep worshipping this high school professor
behave yourself please
Yeah cause your magic invocation of "natural selection did it" for every single biological feature without ever providing a plausible detailed pathway isn't bs at all
@@fab03102its always the same with evolutionists
they bark a lot and behave arrogantly
but when you really dig deeper you see that its just their religion with all kinds of philosophical assumptions and dogmas behind it
@@fab03102 Wrong. Natural selection doesn't actually cause the development of a biological feature, rather, it leads to shifts in demographics that favour certain traits depending on the environment. The actual driving force behind the development of physical traits in organisms is mutation. This is 9th-grade biology, please read a book.
@@ari3903yeah mutations, that are then acted on by natural selection. Are you playing dumb on purpose?
Methodological naturalism is used because we dont have a way to test the supernatural. If a way is found, Id be more than willing to allow other epistemic ideas in science. However just saying that methodological naturalism is some prohibited in science without reason is not exactly the truth.
Michel Behe lost in an offical court about evolution on the basis that evolution has evidence while Behe did not.
Actually Id was rejected because it had religious implications
SUBBOORING IS TERRIFIED OF PROFESSOR DAVE😂😂😂😂
It's Darwin and Darwinism again. Yes you're mad at him for spoiling your party. Grow up and deal with the fact of evolution.
Prof dave explains made a response to you
Professor in what exactly?
Subboor actually just challenged that little fart prof dave (he's not a professor btw). Watch him chicken out. I hope he doesn't though as I'd like to see him getting exposed as the blind follower of philosophical materialism that he is.
@@khaledbekh9477 Exactly. It should be easy to debate him. And anything less than an utter obliteration of Fake Professor Dave would be embarrassing.
@@NeidlichesSchwertAnd yet, this guy is to afraid, knowing Dave can easily win. You guys are hilarious, being this desperate to deny reality.
@@fab03102ruclips.net/video/UUe7CFEBDtc/видео.htmlsi=v_n3v_LtkXUxSrKi
❤
Fraud and Fraud
May the truth forever make you seethe 😘
@@snakejuce lol generally the people presenting the truth don't delete their videos offering for debate and run like a coward but cope ig
@@SigmaValenceThe video is still there🤣. The vid was uploaded on muslimlanterns channel
@@googleenjoyer1503 All these children have are lies and hatred.
Scared of Dave
Nice joke but don’t repeat it
@@admiralzero2685 come on be realistic goldfish have more brain cells than him
@@terryking1094 So, you doubt science? And you call yourself mascot Dave’s follower. Shame on you
@@admiralzero2685 naa I believe science I believe Darwin you know one of the best scientists in human history he doesn’t believe Darwin he doesn’t believe in science he’s batshit crazy
@@terryking1094 If you believe in science, why did you ask me if a goldfish has more brain cells than a human? Who's that scientist?
May Allah bless you bro
انَا اختكمَ مَن اليمَن وّالَلَه ماتكلمتَ الَا من جوّع وًّمَنَ ضَيَقَ الَحَالَ انَا وًّامَيَ وًّاخَوًّتَيَ تَشَرَدَنَا مَنَ بَيَوًّتَنَا بَسَبَبَ الَحَرَبَ نَحَنَ فَيَ حَالَهَ لَايَعَلَمَ بَهَا الَا الَلَهَ حَسَبَنَا الَلَهَ وًّنَعَمَ الَوكيَلَ فَيَ مَنَ اوًّصَلَنَا الَى هَاذا الَحَالَ 💔💔وًّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ مَا كتَبَتَ هَذا الَمَنَاشَدَهَ غَيَرَ مَنَ الَضَيَقَ وّالَفَقَر يَاعَالَمَ حَسَوّا فَيَنَا ارَجَوّكمَ وّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ رَبَ الَعَرَشَ الَعَظَيَمَ انَه الَاكلَ مَا فَيَ عَنَدَيَ بَالَبَيَتَ وًّالَلَهَ يَا اخَوّانَيَ انَهَ اخَوًّنَيَ بَقَعَدَوًّ بَالَيَوًّمَيَنَ مَافَى اكلَ وًّالَلَهَ وًّضَعَنَا كثَيَرَ صَعَبَ نَحَنَ 4 نَفَرَ دَاخَلَ الَبَيَتَ وًّابَيَ مَتَوًّفَيَ وًّلَا يَوًّجَدَ مَنَ يَعَوًّلَ عَلَيَنَا وًّسَاكنَيَنَ فَيَ بَيَتَ اجَارَ لَانَسَتَطَيَعَ دَفَعَ الَاجَارَ الَلَيَ بَاقَيَ عَلَيَنَا ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' اخي اول كلامي انا اقسم بالله على كتاب الله اني لااكذب عليك ولا انصب ولا احتال اني بنت يمنيه نازحين من الحرب انا واسرتي بيننا ایت الشهرب 20 الف يمني والان علينا 60 الف حق 3 شهور وصاحب البيت من الناس الي ماترحم والله يا اخي انه يجي كل يوم يبهدلنا ويتكلم علينا ويريد من البيت للشارع لانناماقدرنا ندفعله الأجار شافونا الجيران نبكي ورجعو تكلمو الجيران ومهلنالاخره الأسبوع معادفعنا له حلف يمين بالله هذا بيخرجنا إلى الشارع رحمه واحنا. بلادنا بسبب هذا الحرب ولانجد قوت يومنا وعايشين اناوامي واخوتي سفار والدنا متوفي الله يرحمه ومامعنا أحد في هذا الدنيا جاانبنا في هذه الظروف القاسيه اخوتي الصغار خرجو للشارع وشافو الجيران ياكلو واوقفو عند بابهم لجل يعطوهم ولو كسره خبز والله الذي له ملك السموات والارض انهم غلفو الباب وطردوهم ورجعو یبکو ایموتو من الجوع ما احد رحمهم وعطلة ردها لقمت عیش والان لوما احدنا ساعدنا في إيكيلو دقيق اقسم بالله انموت من الجوع فيا اخي انا دخيله على الله ثم عليك واريد منك المساعده لوجه الله انشدك بالله تحب الخير واتساعدني ولو ب 500 ريال يمني مع تراسلي واتساب على هذا الرقم 00967717354582 وتطلب اسم بطاقتي وترسلي ولاتتاخر وايعوضك الله بكل خير اخواني سغار شوف كيف حالتهم وساعدنا وأنقذنا قبل أن يطردونا في الشارع تتبهدل أو نموت من الجوع وانا واسرتي نسالك بالله لولك مقدره على مساعد لاتتاخر علينا وجزاك الله خيرا،.،.،:^:؛^:;";""💔😢😭)/))))/)🎉🎉😢😢😢😊😢😢😊😢😊😢😢
🤣
Fanboys of the "Non" Professor Dave crying for the debate with subbor 😂 you dont understand that it take time and there must be rules to keep the debate moderated because your evolutionist kido always use sneaky debate tactics
"Sneaky debate tactics"
Like what?
Asking for it to be available to both parties uncut and unedited?
Asking for it to be moderated by a neutral 3rd party?
Asking that any supporting documents be provided to both debaters prior to the event?
Asking for claims to be backed up by empirical data?
Which of these are "sneaky"?
LOL creationists are so notorious they even have sneaky tactics named after them like "gish gallop"
He won't debate Dave because he's a lying coward.
@@JK-cp8fh Yes my bro Natural Selection Did it
Amin 🙏
Did he convert to Islam ? Why not? Isn’t he smart and educated? Don’t educated people convert to Islam?
Depends on the individual and hidaya comes from God. Dr Keith Moore and other renowned scholars have embraced islam. Make Dua if you are really concerned. May Allah guide professor Mike Behe and us all Ameen
ruclips.net/video/7arebIJSerM/видео.htmlfeature=shared
ruclips.net/video/dLKUfstaYgE/видео.htmlfeature=shared
No they just have a common enemy: science
@@nateswan9527 Yep, actual professor of biochemistry is enemy of science, lol
the blind leads the clown...😂
Funny how evolutionists pretending to be smart and on truth while in reality they just read nonsense from their prophets gods and say Amine 😂
You do realize evolution can be observed in both the lab and field, right?
You understand that you, with just a small amount of training, and personally observe evolution, right?
@@bc2112320We're talking about macro evolution. Evolving from 1 species to another.
@googleenjoyer1503
I'm going to go even further and guess that you can't properly define "species" along with being unable to define "evolution".
Go ahead, try.
Prove me wrong.
Prove you understand what a species is.
@@bc2112320 yes, natural selection did it, Amine 🙏
@@bc2112320 Please define species because philosophers haven’t been able to do that yet
What’s up with these Dave fanboy bots?
They're not bots. Professor Dave accepted the challenge four days ago, and he's now waiting for an email from Subboor.
Nothing worthless bug , dave has accepted sub poors challenge he is waiting for his email