2016 Volvo XC90 Vs 2017 Audi Q7 - Crash Test
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- New 2017 Audi Q7
Small Overlap Front: Good
Moderate Overlap Front: Good
Side: Good
Roof Strength: Good
Head Restraints & Seats
Crash Avoidence & Mitigation: SUPERIOR (with optional equipment)
Front Crash Prevention
Overall evaluation: Good
New 2016 Volvo XC90
Small Overlap Front: Good
Moderate Overlap Front: Good
Side: Good
Roof Strength: Good
Head Restraints & Seats
Crash Avoidence & Mitigation: SUPERIOR (with optional equipment)
Front Crash Prevention
Overall evaluation: Good
"SUBSCRIBE NOW"
that first volvo just gave the wall a high five
Luke Uhlrich
Luke Uhlrich
не смищно
The hood claped against the windsheild it couldve gone through
so is Volvo safer than Audi?
I like how people commenting in volvo crash test videos are wiser, they know about g forces and crumple zones.
Volvo invented the 3 point seat belt system and made the patent available to all the other car brands at no cost in the name of safety.
Yes, it's not the Geeley Volvo though.
Sorry to say this , but no matter what brand , volvo will always be the king of safety
True
Yaaa
BUT EVEN REVIEWING THIS CRASH TEST, VOLVO BY FAR IS SAFER, JUST LOOK HOW IT COMPENSATES FOR THE HIT, THE CAR ricochets smoothly
MASSAD SPETSNAZOVICH SEALOV MB
MASSAD SPETSNAZOVICH SEALOV iijkokkkkkkkiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
kkkkkkkkklllkjjjjjjjkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkjjjj
Volvo's wheel "jumps" out on impact so the rest of the chassis took the energy of the crash. Audi's front wheel gets squezeed in between, which results in less absorbing area and the cars suffers hi g-force. Look how the Volvo deflects to the right on impact and the cars still moves at a considerable speed- less shock for passengers. Volvo's target to eliminate death and serious injuries in their cars is much closer.
Yeah, I see what you mean but I think is hard to believe this will replicate every time in the same way in real world. Also I think people who buy Volvo's are thinking of safety...their safety.
You're thinking about the unlikely, volvo thinks about saving the driver and everyone inside, the outside cannot be controlled and is to be protected by other safety systems, like having railings or pillars on the pedestrian walk places (don't know how to call in english)
then that's even better. I do have a Volvo for safety reasons the next car will be also a Volvo
BTICronox well emagine 2 cars going this speed in the city, then the drivers are fault anyway. + if they are only driving the allowed 50 km/h then after the hit the volvo will maybe go with 5 km/h onto the sidewalk.
+ hitting another car, the volvo will not be pushed 2 the side but push the other car just away from itself.
BTICronox: In a real world situation the Volvo would have applied auto brake and stopped before hitting the barrier. And IF it didn't auto brake, when the car detects a crash it will apply full braking to prevent or minimize further damage. And then it will unlock all the doors so rescue team can enter and it would have dialed emergency number automatically telling the operator what forces was involved, if airbags deployed, number of passengers and so on. And of course the emergency lights will be turned on, and fuel distribution would shut down and the car will enter emergency mode. And besides all this, the belts will pretension BEFORE the crash even happens.
Interesting, the Volvo just slide over the barrier, Audi crash in it and bounce back, both showed good body structure.
But I would believe passengers in xc90 withstand much less force in the crash, Volvo are safer.
a good safety should slide over the small barrier to prevent recoil, in much faster speed for both car, Audi driver will die on the spot due to bounce back, momentum kills, even in this situation the momentum is very strong audi driver face just throw to the front suffer great neck injuries 1:29
邱聖揚 no
Audi door did not open so that is much safer
Master Silence i would believe that's just the sheet metal peeled off, frame of the door is still on the body, as you can see it near window clearly
only the outer shell peeled of, the volvo side impact bar wil still be there in the door frame.
And as the guy here said because the volvo made it slide off to the side you wont feel as much of the impact and that means there chance they get out without any injuries is pretty big. Only thing they will probably suffer is some small cuts from the glass pieces that fly all around in the car and maybe some minor burns from the airbags.
Because Volvo driver's neck was not brutally twisted, like Audi's did, he can walk out right away. The car has even conveniently opened the door for him. Top safety and luxury as is.
Some brilliant engineering from volvo. Structure guided car away from side collision. The door is secondary issue, as long as it opens it's good.
The volvo just slides pass it. Isnt that much safer?
Yes
Yes
Hammare 123 Yes and No, the volvo moved passed the which means it absorbed a lot less energy than the Q7. The Volvo move into unpredictability because as it moves past the initial crash it continues forward likely with the driver rendered unconscious due to the airbags. It is almost always better if the car is stopped by the crash, as the XC90 could've caused or been the victim of a second impact if not stopped by the first.
Eric Fortune Exactly my point the volvo did not stop.
+Cole Haggarty the volvo lose one of its wheel, so yeah it will stop eventually.
Son: Dad how do you spell safety?
Dad: V-O-L-V-O
LOL :)
Lmao its backwords
Volvo's collision was smooth, the car continued forward and the shock was less while Audi went into sudden complete stop that at least will break the neck...Volvo rules but very expensive...
This could also have negative effects if you crash into something further down the road. It highly depends on the situation. The Audi had a less fluent absorbtion but it didn't keep going forward.
Expensive compared to the Audi?? Would 150% go for the XC90!!!
it is just so small change that you would hit somehing after that and it also brakes after the crash by it self.
blabla62871 dude a Volvo in Malaysia is even expensive
Aplope North ok now you say I agree a Volvo XC90 is better but your story in not the end yet if Its 169 k/m a Volvo and Audi bye bye I can imagine 200 k/m your head just fly out to the other car at the back windshield haha! Thats enough the point is One of These Luxury pets safe you that car would be in Top 1 or Top 2
wow a huge difference, because the volvo slides away it creates less G then the audi! Much less. So the impact itself is better for the people inside in the Volvo for sure!
and the people outside? (surroundings) :) it could be not so good for them ;)
The Spectator who cares about people outside?
I think if they did it again it wouldn’t
The Spectator the Volvo should stop automatically I believe, modern cars such as Volvo should have sensors that once detected a crash starts braking
Legendary Dark Mafia they both do but their testing how safe the cars are if they were to get into a crash
Volvo cars seem to be designed to push outwards against anything it crashes into, in this instant it pushes itself outwards, I believe this is more to the point that most car crashes are not head on collisions but rather side crashes, in these cases you rather have the car slide past the colliding car or object rather than coming to a halt like the Audi, that way all the momentum the Volvo built up will by natural physics slow itself down which is far safer than coming to a full stop like the Audi, this is why most fatalities happens in full stop collisions even if compartment is not compromised, our organs are not designed for things like this.
Very nice comment but in both cars you have the airbags which are designed to absorb the full stop. But what happens if the car is not stopping at the impact but continues to slide forward without a front wheel? If it hits another car the airbags have been already deployed, what is protecting you from the second collision?
@@djdoomy number one - you need to be still alive to think about second collision.
number two - audi will have the same issue because the Q7 is complete 90 degree in the middle of the road. It won't be able to prevent another car hitting them either.
Notice that the Audi does not offer a drivers side knee air bag..
Integratedcraig knee airbags are used when the seat can not handle powerful enough belt tentioner.
i hope you do understand that is bullshit? If they use a more powerful belt tensioner they will cause injuries or even kill people with it. So adding other things the prevent you from getting hurt is better then just making the pull on the belt even bigger.
bob rosco no. belt tension is first choice. knee airbags is second. worked 20 year with car seat engineering.
the trick is to position the passenger correctlly in the seat in the crash moment. If seat structure can not take the load from multiple tensioners you have to compensate with knee airbag. airbags are sensitive for seating position. tensioners are not. manufactorers that have knee airbag were not able to get the seat structure to be strong enough.
Integratedcraig I did not realize tha
Mimo wszystko, w audi, nawet jeżeli przeżyje się zderzenie, to na pewno trafi się do szpitala z obrażeniami. W volvo system SIPS tak rozkłada siłę uderzenia, że nie jest ono tak bardzo odczuwalne przez użytkowników. Sama przetestowałam ten system na sobie. Z prędkością 120 km/h wylądowałam na drzewie i nie tylko nic mi się nie stało, ale również ledwo czułam szarpnięcie w trakcie uderzenia. Całe moje obrażenia, to lekki ból w karku od naciągnięcia mięśni, w klatce piersiowej od pasa i maleńkie zadrapanie na nodze. Z auta wyszłam o własnych siłach. Poduchy czy kurtyny powietrzne, to jedno, a amortyzacja uderzenia, to dopiero majstersztyk inżynierii. Zresztą, niektórzy mieli okazję przekonać się na własnej skórze, jak twardym autem jest volvo. Chyba w żadnym innym aucie nie wyjdzie się cało z czołówki z tirem.
Think of the g forces here. While the XC90 slides of and uses some time to decelerate - the Q7 actually has a negative stopping length.
Volvo slides through the barrier like a knife cutting butter and the dummy's head just lightly touched the airbag while audi's dummy got smashed into the airbag. 10km/h higher , the rating might be very different for these cars
Xü Sang hacet p
In cabin small particles flying forward (In XC90) are bigger concern
Most of these crash tests and ratings are designed to make customers FEEL most of their cars are adequate even if there's substantial difference. You're around three times as likely to die in a typical 4 star vehicle than a 5 star one- betcha wouldn't have guessed that!
the volvo is so much better in all the tests, see how it slides away and the wheel gets out of the car, i would prefere 100 times the volvo in this scenario
yes but usualy if it slides on the right side, there is no other car, and for the passengers this will make a loooot less braking delay and can make an incredible better outcome
If it slides on the right side you could end up crashing into a tree or pole afterwards, and the same isn't quite as likely with the Audi. However, they're both rated very safe cars so it's hard to tell which one is objectively "better." Seems like Volvo's reputation is enough to convince people their cars are the safest no matter what.
It slows xc90 down - it stops few meters after the crash. it's only 64 km/h. Accident in q7 with 80km/h and you will not survive
what kills you is deacceleration.. you dont want the car to brake instant, u want it to do what volvo did.. else u get to much G-force for your organs to handle
It doesn't matter, your odds are still better compared to that Audi, which is getting all the impact energy. Mind you these tests are made with 50 or 60km/h. Imagine crashing with 100km/h. Your organs will become a soup, regardless how good the cage and the airbags of the Audi are. With the Volvo you escape most of this energy altogether. So whatever danger waits for you when you slide to the right, it is a) most likely stationary and not moving towards you, b) part of your speed is already gone and c) you are still in a very, very safe car.
This music makes me feel like I'm defusing a bomb In an 80s action movie
After watching a few small overlaps on many Volvo's. It turns out almost all Volvo cars are slightly better in throw away kinetic energy to reduce the impact strength. So I'm on the Swede's side when it comes to safety.
No matter, it is still pretty amazing how much safer cares have become in the last 20-30 years.
Who cares?
@@MilosSrb. people who drive?
@@SpecialInMyOwnWay it was a joke because you wrote cares instead of cars
@@MilosSrb. i didnt? I didnt type that comment lol.
@@SpecialInMyOwnWay oh oops😂
The first one Volvo be like : "I aint got time for crash test I need to go to my home!"
😂👍
Watch the I3 one😂 Taken to another level
That's why I drive a Volvo xc90.
It won't keep going. It'll lean and scrape the broken wheel chassis.
sillieww Wow so good! XC90 has been my dream car since its launch. The design is perfect - luxurilus, powerful, but pragmatic too. But it is too expensice where I live. So, i and my BF settled for S60. Maybe later when we have kids we are going to move on to XC90 for sure. very envious!
It wont go much further than Q7 went back. The only difference, the direction of Volvo resulted in gentle stop, Q7 basically stopped and then went back. That's a neck injury - guaranteed.
like wise. safest cars on the market! love my volvos
sillieww My Xc90 T8 is the best car I ever owned, love to drive it!
I 'like' the fact that the Volvo just slides past because I think this scenario is likely to happen where there are other cars to the right of, and/or behind the crashing vehicle. The Volvo continuing forward allows slightly more time, I think, for moving vehicles to the right or behind to avoid to avoid or slow down, if not stop; whereas in the case of the Audi (and frankly all of the other vehicles I have seen pass this test), the collision is very suddenly halted, putting that much more of the impact through the passengers, and causing the vehicle to fishtail to the right - becoming a wall for the cars to the right and behind it. I believe, that even if the passengers of the Audi survive the first impact, they would perish in the second and third impacts of the vehicles slamming into (now structurally compromised) drivers side, having stopped sooner; whereas the Volvo side sweeps the collision and comes to a stop somewhere ahead of itself. The cars behind a critical second more to react to avoid/slow down, tho probably colliding into the less structurally compromised rear of the Volvo. Watching these small overlap tests is jarring and eye-opening!
Хуйню сморозил.
Volvo has been doing this type of bracing of the A pillar and forward frame since the 90s, thanks ya'll. Always feel a little easier in your beautiful cars
Всегда так было с Вольво. И будет. Отличные безопасные тачки, но без драйва.
If you look again at the video, you will see that the passenger in the Volvo suffer a much less shock than the one in the Audi. The fact that the Audi bounces back, this can result in snapping your neck. In the Volvo the impact is much smother
so the Volvo is safer, no surprises here.
Hää, Ergebnis nicht gesehen? Audi ist besser!
+Merlin Audi/BMW/Mercedes konnte in Punkto Sicherheit noch nie Volvo vollends das Wasser reichen! Siehe IIHS Tests
***** check other poor Audi cars, compare V40 (safest car in its class) vs A3
Hunne0815 you are a fool. Did you see the horrible whiplash the Audi dummy suffered. Your neck can't be replaced. Your car can. Volvo won this by a mile buy not having the shock of the Audi.
The impact and g-forces sustained by passengers in an Audi are greater than in a Volvo. The sudden change in direction (Audi basically stopped and bounced back in the opposite direction) can alone cause serious injuries to your neck and back (whiplash). Volvo's deceleration was much more gradual. My wife worked at a rehabilitation clinic (with people after car accidents) and the vast majority of injuries are actually caused by whiplash.
The Audi airbags deploy too early. Then when the Audi slows down massively when hitting the bulkhead, the bags are already deflated, causing the dummy's head to strike the A pillar.
The Volvo deals with this situation much better, with later deployment, and then the car avoids the massive slow down, without hitting the bulkhead. It has struts under the bonnet, that will deflect the car away from just a situation.
I am not an automotive engineer, but from a common sense view, would rather be in the Volvo
You can make as many tests you wish ....... Volvo is the safest car however you angle your tests
pe er Saab is very safe too
pe er Tesla Model X?
TESLA IS SHIT PLEASE UNDERSTAND.
If you look (1:37) you'll notice the Volvo had an airbag pop where the knees are, the Audi didn't.
The sudden stop gives me the impression of a stronger car and that it is safer for vehicles and people outside, but the rapid decelaration seems to be worse for the driver and passengers. As a driver or passenger, I would prefer to be in the Volvo due to the smoother deceleration.
No, the volvo has got a system that if the car hits another car on the side there are some metal bars
which makes it slide past if it is under 25% overlap. And if it hits head on, it will hit the frame. So basically when it overlaps it will not hit the frame of the car, because it will slide on the side of the frame.
Man, the g-forces in the Audi!
So I am a Volvo guy through and through, however if you slow the videos down even more when the initial impact happens, you will see the airbags on the Audi actually deploy faster than on the Volvo. I am curious than which is better for protecting occupants. If anyone has insight on if it is better for the airbag to deploy quicker or to be delayed a fraction of a second longer like it did here in the Volvo.
i am so proud of VOLVO as volvo driver.
Volvo is my dreamcar,not bmw or mercedes 🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪♠️♣️♠️♣️
look at the force on the neck of both passengers and the marks on the airbags/face.
TheTiredEye I think neck forces would be reduced if they left the head rest in
It's so cool how nowadays the inside of the car is like full of the softest pillows if you crash. " oh no im gonna crash......oh well might as well take a nap "
Audi shows a really solid structure because it absorbs the whole crash energy without any deformation of the passenger cell, the Volvo structure deflects the trajectory avoiding the contact between passenger cell and barrier, so... who knows?
Why absorb when it can be deflected?
Yeah, avoiding a severe deceleration surely makes it safer, but the idea
of the Small Overlap Crash Test is to see how well the A pillar and
footwell withstands the crash and also how well frontal and curtain
airbags dampens the energy of the oblicuous movement of the dummy. As
the new XC90 tront structure seems to be designed to guide the car away
from the obstacle, there's no way of seeing this. And I'm not saying it
won't be able to perform excellent in this area, Volvo always has been
the best regarding structural rigidity, but if the car "skips" the
obstacle, this test loses all its purpose.
This test is about driver safety, not structure strength...
When this test was introduced, Volvo was the only one who made it. All other failed. That's because Volvo builds cars that could protect passengers in a crash. Other makers build cars that can get good scores on crash tests. The same has showed up now with small overlap on passenger side, where a car with good rating in the drivers side can get poor rating on the passenger side.
@@chinichi23751 Structure strength IS ABOUT driver safety, nothing else. Weak structure is the deadliest factor for the passenger in a car crash. How was you thinking here man?
I work for a company called millbrook and we crash test cars, the thing that nobody understands is the goal of the manufacturer is not to stop the car suddenly the front of your car is built like a suspension but volvos have a completely different system to most cars the car has a clever front end that if the car exceeds 50G it enters a shape like this /\ which will make the car go left or right depending on which side the car hit, this is because if the car was to have stopped and not gone off to the side the adults would survive but probably not the children and this is where others fail volvo is the best in safety all together but with a system like euro n cap and with a score board set so low it just doesn't show to everybody! Plus Volvo share there research to all manufacturers! And invented the seat belt they are the better car and always will be!
Volvo winning on safety, what's new? :)
Advocatus Diaboli um check in slow mo both deployments are pretty equal and both don’t strike a pilllar
Volvo sliding through causes risk of another impact , also good point someone below raised about bonnet cutting into the cabin. Interesting. Also door sustains heavy damage which can cause issues during extraction of a passenger
what about the brain that slammed into the front of the skull in the audi??? lol
I would love to be in volvo if this happens.
Палец вверх инженерам Volvo
Volvo deflects the collision the audi take the full impact which means higher g forces
They say that not a single occupant of a Volvo XC90 had died in a crash in 16 years.
That slide away action of the XC90 was deliberately engineered in by Volvo. Their entire line up show the same movement in the frontal offset test. What's more surprising is how their previous generation XC90 exhibited the same behaviour when this type of test was introduced without notice by IIHS. This goes to show that Volvo is ahead of those crash testing organisations and indeed, the German luxury brands when it comes to knowledge and experience in designing safe vehivle structures.
This is no safety feature. Volvo is an expert in tricking safety tests. Crash Design follows Crash Test procedures.
Thomas Haring volvos design is designed to beat this type of crash, which is one of the most deadly, which is why they introduced this new test cause lots of people were being killed in these types of crashes.
You want to stop when you engage in a crash, not to slide off the side uncontrollably
@@t.haring3223 2003 volvo slides away like any other modern volvos. small overlap came out in 2012
Volvo is safer, the structure is stronger and the airbags are much better. Also Audi has used Takata airbags in the past. Volvo is one of the few manufacturers that never used a Takata airbag.
August 15, 2017 3:10 am
yeah... I'll admit I'm a true audi fan... But I prefer the xc90.
HyDrA me to
Me ur braindead.
Me For me Volvo overtook any kind of german car manufacturer. The Xc90 is just so much more comfortable and beautiful then like a q7 (I drove in both cars more than a few times, and the volvo even had a fridge with champagne in the back, while the audi had that touchpad on the gear lever) both were about the same price but definetly on a different level
Modern cars automatically stop as soon as a impact is detected, it is way better to go from 40mph - 36 - 24 - 14 - 3 - 0 mph over a few seconds then 40 - 0 in a split second. Not only are you exposed to significantly less forces, you have a lower chance of intrusion of the safety cage in other crashes. This shows since the Volvo xc90 has been out on the roads since 2002 with no deaths at all, ever, that’s 22 years!
Bottom line: the final reports for both cars showed orange (marginal) in certain areas for the Audi but the Volvo aced the tests with Green (good) and Yellow (adequate) and that was backed up by the IIHS crash tests showing better numbers for the Volvo as well... as Charlie Sheen would say the Volvo is "winning"
No. The final report for the Audi was all green apart from the foot which was yellow/acceptable
@@akj2387 Last tested in 2020 with more orange than Donald Trump
@@steve8510 What a troll lol.
Check the small overlap results for the 2017-2020 Q7. There's only one "yellow" and the rest is green, you know this too.
And in fact in 2021 they retested it and every body part is green now.
@@akj2387 You're wrong orange man, just accept it
@@akj2387 ps: you have nothing to do with Audi sans this idiotic fanboy thing you are doing... pps: I like my feet
For those of you saying Volvo won, your actually wrong. The XC90 got Top Safety Pick while Q7 got Top Safety Pick+ due to head lights …
But the passengers in the Volvo would withstand more force than the Audi
Kinda diminishes some of the credibility of the "Top Safety Pick +' doesnt it?
They basically punished volvo for a technically and yet didnt give any recognition for being head and shoulders above every other vehicle in this crash. They should have changed the point system for this crash once volvo beat everyone by such a wide margin.
Volvo seems to outclass every other vehicle in small overlap
Reading a lot of these comments it seems that although the Volvo performed more admirably under these particular circumstances (entirely due to the retained forward momentum), it does not necessarily prove it is better. The reason for the continued forward momentum is likely due to a part of the engine housing being shaped to deflect under collision with a solid object. However, in reality, very few crashes would be against an object so specifically rigid. Therefore the effects of continued momentum and the effects of such must be discarded in favour of occupant area intrusion and spinal movement limitation. Because the Volvo deflects and doesn't impact the same way it appears to perform much better but this also taints the results.
This crash test simulates the deadliest crash there is where the driver tries to avoid a tree or light hole or something and manages to turn in time to only catch 25% of the vehicle. This type of crash is much deadlier than a head on collision prompting the regulators to push the car manufacturers to make cars safer in these small overlap crashes. Obviously, volvo did exactly that.
volvo done better i think
indra bendi clearly the Volvo has done better. The Audi stopped in a instant, the Volvo defected away from the object.
The volvodriver could probably walk away unsvaced. Audidriver is hospitalised at best.
dare_06*_*
Nah.
dare_)6*_*
Nope, no way you can just "walk away" from a sudden stop like that. The g-forces created from that stop can give you whiplash so severe that it can even snap your neck and kill you instantly. The guy above was correct that in the Audi, you would still need to be taken to the hospital. With the Volvo, you have a MUCH higher chance of not even needing a medical checkup after the impact, the volvo driver can just go home and watch tv.
That's really dangerous from volvo, imagine in a busy intersection the same crash happend to the volvo and it keeps rollin.. it could hit anything that comes in it's way. that's why the audi is safer
Would not surprise me if next generation of Q7 also slides away from the barrier. The trend is and have always been, that Volvo develop new safety standards that the rest of the market copies. I would sure as hell prefer to be in the Volvo in that specific crash. The kenetic forces are way lower towards head and neck in the volvo. The measurements-facts in this thread is clear about that. Stay safe, drive carefully, no matter in witch brand!
Is it only me that like Headlights flying out at these tests? :D
And this is why I pay relatively low insurance prices for South Florida -- in a 2016 XC90. VOLVO for LIFE. simple.
Поставьте лайк, пусть иностранцы думают что здесь что-то умное!!!
Ez Ex и я очень умное написал Volvo потом ещё написал Q7
Сингулярно!
Монописуально
Пиздец
Как же вы блять заебали нахуй
The volvo deflects the impact away from the safety cage. Notice how the head just touches the airbag whereas the audi the forces would have a lot more g forces and the head hit the airbag harder
I'm looking forward to the time, when a volvo vs truck will get 5 stars too...
The Volvo was like “I’ve done my job now I’m outta here”
They didn't really crash test the Volvo against the wall did they? They crash tested the wall against the Volvo! They came to the conclusion that the wall is too weak to be use in further tests.
Some people don't understand this: In a real world situation the Volvo would have applied auto brake and stopped before hitting the barrier. And IF it didn't auto brake, when the car detects a crash it will apply full braking to prevent or minimize further damage. And then it will unlock all the doors so rescue team can enter and it would have dialed emergency number automatically telling the operator what forces was involved, if airbags deployed, number of passengers and so on. And of course the emergency lights will be turned on, and fuel distribution would shut down and the car will enter emergency mode. And besides all this, the belts will pretension BEFORE the crash even happens.
Wow!
I love my SUV Volvo XC90.. my first volvo and the right choice since like a month ago....
herzaman iyii temiz sürüş güven veren tek ototmobili̇yi
Volvo: 1. Audi: 0.
No.... audi 1 ,volvo 0 😉
@@igorfridrich1070 I guess you didn't see the video.
Volvo deflected the collision ,but audi has a firmer body.
@@igorfridrich1070 Firmer Body means more G force inside the vehicle, thats a bad thing, you should read more on this, liking Audi is not an argument.
Bir Volvo sahibi olarak çok farklı ve fantastik bir araç ondan asla vazgeçemem.
Well done, Volvo.
BTW, who ever needs Audi at all?
sells better than Volvo..
Алексей Хотыненко a Volvo for Youngsters okay a Audi for people is not rich but you want a good car
I always thought that Volvo is for senior people. For parents of our parents. As Audi - for german cement salesmen and accounters.
Алексей Хотыненко no wrong way my is correct I got to correct you
Ok.
Always do research. Here are the NUMBERS:
Volvo XC90 2016/2017 crash data:
Driver injury measures
Test ID CEN1543
Head
HIC-15 37
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.5
Extension bending moment (Nm) 14
Maximum Nij 0.14
Chest maximum compression (mm) 16
Audi Q7 2017 crash data:
Driver injury measures
Test ID CEN1604
Head
HIC-15 225
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.3
Extension bending moment (Nm) 8
Maximum Nij 0.30
Chest maximum compression (mm) 30
And yes indeed - Driver head is much safer in Volvo XC90 (at least for this first crash).
With Driver Neck its not so simple.
Emagine beeing in a crash vs one of these two and you are driving something like an old GEO Metro.
I would say the Volvo wins. The whiplash of the head and neck in the Audi looked intense
new volvo models trying to reduce g ımpact on passengers and its wonderfull same system used in s90 to and look q7 instant stop, q7 is also safe but gonna fuck you up after crash
dexon777 exactly
The Volvo airbags look so comfortable.
Both did well, but Audi is the safer choice I feel. To those saying that the Volvo slid off the barrier, less force etc blah blah blah that argument has no weight. In a real world crash you won't always have a barrier to slid off of, so the vehicle that took the impact head on and showcased its ability and strength was the Audi and it's injuries measures were all good like the volvos so it's not about Volvo being safer, they both are but the Audi took the entire impact like a pro and held up. Who knows how the volvos structure would hold up bc it slid off.
Jay Genson No, because physics.
today cars have to absorb,..... both are a credit,..... but the Volvo takes the shock away from the cabin, some of that by letting go its wheel.....old days you had a girder built in to your bumper, that's gone, cars have come a long way since
And yet when I look at the final results there is orange (marginal) all over the Audi report and nothing but green and yellow for the Volvo... an easy victory to Volvo
Jay Genson then watch another crash test of the volvo...audi fanboy
Go watch full video on xc90 crash test, and you will see the head collition.
How is that even possible that they gave these 2 SUV the same mark ? XC90 is miles ahead as long as safety is concerned
Volvo was like: "Ain't nobody got time for dat" *keeps on rolling*
5 Stars for Volvo. Although Audi passes the test, it is obvious that passengers in XC are more safe
Я бы предпочёл находиться в ВОЛьВО.
Чего?
В вольво ноги зажало а в ауди нет
@@ВасилийЯковлев-ь7в4к вот что значит перейти к китайцам. Срезало угол как консервную банку
Василий Яковлев в ауди водитель получил травму шеи
@@ЖЭКАВалерич зато никаких вторичных нагрузок на грудь из-за ремня и на шею,просто машина чуть изменила траекторию и после удара,пошла дальше, водитель ударился у подушки и остался на месте,в Ауди же,водитель прилетел в подушки,а потом когда удар дошел до бруса перед лобовым, вторичный рывок вперёд и водитель ещё раз испытал на себе все тягости ремня,да ещё и тачка отпрыгнула назад и в сторону так,что,при ни дай Бог такой ситуации,отлетела непонятно в кого дальше.
Я очень люблю Ауди,с удовольствием бы ее себе купил,это для того что б не думали что я тупо обсираю ее,но Вольво более безопасна,и раз срезало угол,значит так лучше,не будет Вольво халтурить на безопасности
The AUDI showed better body structure after crash. The back part didn't bend.
look at the back door of audi. it popped out
Its great news! It means they gonna refurbish Audi and resale it like used one "in excellent condition".
PS. There bends peoples inside the car instead of back part.
🤦♂️
the audi is safer, because the car probably broke down and you won't be able to drive it
hahahaha
Maybe we are fan boys, but Volvo is still better haha
android is better Iphone sucks.
You should give us a proof, reason why.
Bloody Germans not knowing VW (Owner of Audi) is created by Hiter ^^ Go on good old Saab!
In this situation you would get less hurt in a Volvo because you keep going through and the G force is very minimal inside the car, whereas in Audi you stop suddenly and you're pushed backwards. The seat belts would dig into your skin and cause bruising from the force. In other words you'd be sore af in the Audi.
All Volvos slide away on this test. Great job, Volvo.
The XC90 didn't even bother to stop! :-)
Even the safest cars in the world are useless if its driven by an unsafe driver.
Idk why everyone is saying they would have one or the other, I would take either one! Both are very safe suv's!
Mistake at 1:03 ^^
Q7???????
I'm just curious but are these cars ready to drive. I mean to they have the engine and all that to just hop on and drive away? (kind of a stupid question since the test would be irrelevant whatsoever, but I don't know about testing) Like ofc the engine and all is there but is the car itself drive-able?
If you crash on the highway and slide the other you will get another crash to your car. So I mean in this aspect volvo is great
Brozers VD มทสยนาาณงบๆใชมวลวลในอุ
I must be missing something, the Audi passenger compartment from A pillar backwards suffered far less deformation then the Volvo. The fact that the front wheel was ripped off the Volvo to me appears cause for concern as the wheel on the Audi remained in situate and fractured thereby absorbing much of the impact. The fact that the Volvo was propelled forward and possibly into further harm is surely cause for concern ? The Audi spun through 90 degrees so that the rear of the car would possibly impact any object, whilst not the ideal scenario if your sat in the trunk surely better than being propelled into the Abyss ??
Whatever ya gotta do to feel good about your audi you probably own.
However, It's very clear which vehicle you would have a better chance of walking away from and which vehicle would cause your Brain to get slammed into the front of your skull...then the back of your skull, along with every organ, bone, and joint goin from 60 to 0 in a nano-sec. I guarantee very crash test expert in history would rather be in the volvo instead of the audi in this crash.
But please keep on drinking the audi Koolaid
Everybody says volvo is safer, but when people are thinking of buying brand new car, no one buy volvo.. everybody goes for bmw, merco, audi... or for less, hyundai , honda, toyota... in America. Volvo is just safe car not more than that.
Because it doesn't drive better, and it's way too expensive for how it handles.
in Norway They almost outsell the germans and lexus are just now starting to get populare
Actually I wanted to find some counterargument, but you are pretty right. I have volvo v70 (not brand new) and I admit that Volvo doesn't give so much for a customer, beyond high prices if something brokes. You can't buy powerful engine - 2.0 4 cylinder is a joke in a comparison to some 3.0 bmw or audi. Everything is about habit I think. I have driven Volvo for 5-6 years and know I won't buy any other car but I respect if somebody says that he won't buy any other car than Audi. And I would like to say "hey, you must admit - interior, especially dashboard is much more pretty and intuitive than bmw...... or seats omg they are genius" but I know it depends on a person... And for that price merc, bmw or audi may give much more.
Says the guy who can't afford one.
Menghini sure we don't. But you do.
Yup, Volvo looks like it did a better job deflecting the energy away from the occupants.
зауважал Вольво!
да вольво в плане безопасности это топ !!!
I wonder if they did it again, would the outcome be different?
No
félicitation volvo 2019
The Volvo is like "Crash ? What crash ?!"
well, it's a volvo. duh
0:08 This is the second time I see a Volvo slide past on a partial overlap head-on collision test.
The front wheel is designed to absorb the bulk of the impact and detach, allowing the rest of the vehicle to slide past.
This greatly reduces the impact to the passenger compartment, and you can see that clearly in the slow-mo interior shot.
No other car company can stand up to Volvo when it comes to safety!
Audi is safe
@@tripham3280 if you cant tell which car you would rather have your children in for this crash, which happens to be the deadliest crash there is, you cant be helped.
volvo is like water
its the point, in that crash the audi driver would be really injured. the volvo driver would be completely fine.
The audi smashed to a halt and everything was thrown around, however the volvo was soft and made sure that the internal parts of the person wont be damaged, unlike the audi
I don't think so. If the volvo driver would have been fine while the audi driver would have been badly injured they wouldn't have gotten the same grades, which they did as you could see in the end. I don't get how everybody in the comments think they ere the experts. The videos are nice to look at, but in the end you have to rely on the data from the crash dummy.
Tasteless?
what does A vs G+ represent. Looking at both vehicles right now.
That was for the easy of attaching/installing a child car seat
Whats the music/song ??????
Constance - The Descent - Kevin MacLeod
ruclips.net/video/puVz8taSANE/видео.html
CAR TV thanx🎅🏼👍🏼❗
Darude Dankstorm
69digit
69digit 'dance till your ded'
Volvo stay the best in security💪🏼. But the Q7 is no bad.