Размер видео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показать панель управления
Автовоспроизведение
Автоповтор
At 24:16 are we to understand Eq (5) as the union of all Kbar_j's s.t. the condition holds? Otherwise it is a set of subsets of U.
Sorry for the late reply, only saw this now. No, not the union of different Kbar_j's, only the one for which the stuff to the right of the ":" holds. That is, it is non-empty, it is either j=k, or it is such that the next one is empty.
At 24:16 are we to understand Eq (5) as the union of all Kbar_j's s.t. the condition holds? Otherwise it is a set of subsets of U.
Sorry for the late reply, only saw this now. No, not the union of different Kbar_j's, only the one for which the stuff to the right of the ":" holds. That is, it is non-empty, it is either j=k, or it is such that the next one is empty.