The debate rages on about whether the sequel is better than the original, but one thing that I think most people can agree on is that the first two Alien films are classic sci-fi films.
Both great, the first one is slow burn sci-fi horror, atmospheric and more creepy, this one is like an action movie and faster pace, and a bigger production.
I like Alien for introducing the story and Aliens for taking it up a notch. One sets the other up so both are important. They definitely lost all momentum in A3 and onwards. Ended up becoming a purely nerdy thought experiment.
@ThaUltimateHunter It wasn't the editing that bothered me but the way they killed off Newt. It broke the lore of the story and didn't advance it at all. I understand if they did it because they couldn't use the actor in real life. That's a shame. Would have been better just not to do the movie at all. In the comics Newt lives on and has adventures of her own.
Ladies, great reaction. The reason Ripley could drive the loader is that was her job on the space station after she was rescued and lost her flight status, so the technology is not in question. I adore this movie, and Ripley's character is a role model not only for women, but for men as well.
I imagine also that being the third in command of the Nostromo meant she was intelligent, adaptable, and competent, so while she had to learn to operate some new gear in her new job she's definitely the kind of person who can learn quick and do what needs to be done to make ends meet. I totally agree that Ripley is a role model for competence, it's very clear she's absolutely terrified after her previous encounter with the Xenomorph so her final actions of bravery feel much more meaningful, she's afraid but dealing with the fear and not just unafraid due to false confidence or ignorance of the threat.
@@G1NZOUIf you're a Warrant Flight Officer than is rated to pilot a starfreighter, learning to be a Power Loader operator will be no problem. It is akin to being an Airline Pilot who loses his flight license and has to make do and retrain as a Warehouse Forklift Operator. Nothing to do with being in Third-in-Command of the Nostromo. Her place in the Chain-of-Command was contingent on being the Flight Officer in the first place.
@@Ryan_Christopher Yes I agree, my point was she was already competent and well trained, and as a flight officer in general in modern day is meant to be adaptable, adjusting to be a forklift operator and transferring common sense skills like culture of safety and checklists would be a piece of cake.
In the extended version Ripley had a daughter that died before she returned home. Which I think make her relationship with Newt have so much more depth.
Yeah trade off of losing the scene with Ripley's daughter dying before she got back and missing the scene that spoils what happens on the colony. If there's a cut that includes the daughter scene and axes the colony scene, that is the best of the bunch.
Lt. Ellen Ripley is the personification of a strong woman on film. She's a woman that doesn't need to beat the crap and kill men to prove that she's a strong woman. She's a leader and a protector. Men will follow her because they trust her leadership. That is a good example of a strong woman on film.
@@lewas91 You mean where everyone is a competent person who does not do wildly stupid things? It is the age old battle of two starkly different philosophies. 1) A rising tide lifts all boats or 2) Life is a zero-sum game where in order for me to get a bigger piece of the pie others have to get less.
@@allrequiredfields nope, Sarah started to became a human terminator at the end of T1, we can see that in T2. She's as lethal as a human can be, Ripley becomes that only in Alien: Resurrection.
Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Beatrix Kiddo, Imperator Furiosa, etc... all these Hollywood heroines have one thing in common: they're all characters. If you want a true female action star, gotta look into those who got established in Hong Kong: Michelle Yeoh, Cynthia Rothrock, Yukari Oshima, Moon Lee, etc...
Paul Reiser is the actor from this and "Stranger Things", and here's a fun fact: his performance was so believable in this that even his own mother was glad when he met his fate!
His entire character in Stranger Things played off the role from Aliens. You were supposed to be suspicious of him until it turned out that he's "an ok guy".
@@DzinkyDzink It's funny, because his role in this film was based on the same premise: he'd been known for TV sitcoms and was considered a likeable guy, so he was cast as the villain because people's initial reaction would be to trust him.
'Get away from her you b**ch' - just an iconic line from one of the best leads in a sci fi action franchise ever (maybe THE best). Terminator next for sure, another amazing leading lady with an equally fantastic (better) sequel..also from Jimmy Cams
The Directors cut is better in every way in my opinion. They use the few extra minutes here and there very well. They get into Ripley's Daughter who died 2 years before she is found, so the mommy reference makes much more sense. They show the outpost functioning before the alien ship is found. And you get a just a few more minutes of character development before the marines start dropping like flies. ;p
FUNFACT about Carrie Henn aka Newt. It was her first and only camera role she ever took. She became a grade school teacher instead but from time to time she gets fan letters and kids tell her, her praent's loved her in Aliens. James Cameron was more cautious about the film environment toward Carrie than her actual parent's, meaning he was on her side all the time making her as comfortable as possible. Also she said that Sigorney became like her actual 2nd mom for the time and she loves her. Its all said in the cast reunion at comicon 2016. RIP Bill "Hudson" Paxton 🥺😢
Jenette also really didn't do much in hollywood after this movie. She was so great in it i expected much more out of her, but wasn't to be. She did a bunch of cameos and 2 bit roles but based on her in Aliens i would have thought she would have a much bigger career. Good looking, curvy, young, and her first role such a good one? Nope.
Ripley is what people should aspire to be: Strong, intelligent, and adaptive when they need to be, vulnerable enough to admit they need someone to help at times.
Yeah, I'm so tired of Gen Z saying there are no strong woman characters. There always have been. Stop bitching just for bitching. Princess Lea was no wimp either
It's cool to me that Cameron got his start with an FX demo if a woman in an exoskeleton fighting a robot. Which kinda made it into his first two mainstream movies in a way.
Ripley learned to drive a power loader when she was working on the docks when they took away her flight officer status. Burke mentioned she was driving loaders in her current job.
Personally I always had a bit of an issue with this only because it had been many years realtime since she had used one and based on how things update and change in reality it only makes sense that the power loader would have had multiple updates and changes over 50+ years
@@stormywaters1565 it hadn't been many years. She took a job at the docks because she could no longer be a flight officer (remember Burke saying he knew it was the best job she could get). She learned to use a loader for the job at the docks. So, she only used a loader for the time between when she lost her officer position and they came asking her to return to the planet. Though they don't specify how much time that was, it was obviously enough time for her to achieve a class 2 rating on the power loader.
@@richardb6260 ah yeah ok I was always puzzled by that but makes sense now. The movie doesn't do a great job of making it evident a good bit of time had passed between her return home and departure.
@@shannanmuire The Dark Horse comics continuity makes it especially easy to ignore the following (comparatively terrible) later movies. Absolutely more enjoyable than the grim and repetitive story elements sprinkled into the later films. Would far prefer the Alien franchise had gone down that pathway rather than what we got from the horrific Alien 3 or even the prequel Prometheus. As it stands, the one movie I do like that feels like it belongs to the Alien/Aliens universe is a film starring Sean Connery called 'Outland.' Same set designer, so it matches the same industrial vibe. Obviously no Xenomorphs, but it tells a story that looks like it could have happened in that same universe.
Poor Jonesy. Imagine being a cat from Ripley's traumatic past, thrown 57 years forword into a whole new feline world. Unable to identify with other cats. Poor Jonesey :(
Ripley is such a good leader. when Hudson starts freaking out she gives him a simple but important task, enough to get his mind off things, isolate him from the group for a bit so he stops freaking them out and get his head back in the game while feeling important to the group. Excellent game plan and reaction.
One of the best Sci-fi Action movies ever made! It was nominated for 7 Oscars: Best Actress, Sigourney Weaver Best Sound Editing, Don Sharpe Best Sound Mixing, Nicholas De Musserier Best Visual Effects, Stan Winston, John Richardson, Robert Skotak Best Film Editing Ray Lovejoy Best Original Score, James Horner Best Production Design, Peter Lamont. It won Best Visual Effects and Sound Editing. It made $193 million dollars ($714 million dollars today) against an $18 million dollar budget. Its regarded as one of the best Sci-fi Action movies ever made.
@@reesebn38 The writers specifically wrote the main role to be non gender specific. Why they ended up choosing Sigourney, I don't know, but it turned out to be a genius move.
@@riveraharper8166 shainewhite. I've seen this message on every Aliens reaction I've watched. I was just wondering if they had it saved and just pasted it in. Lol, it's cool though.
Alien 3 is actually great. Purely for Charles Dance’ performance. One of the greatest English actors of all time. And resurrection was ok. We don’t talk about AVP though.
"How did we not think about the ceiling?" It didn't show up in the blue prints. The group were working on flawed intel, not knowing that the rooms were modular with a gap between the room's ceilings and the actual roof of the complex. Unfortunately the people who could have informed them about that were all used as chestburster incubators.
I'm not so sure about that. What I saw of it in the making of doc looked as much like puppetry as animatronics. That's not to say that the puppetry wasn't great if that is a closer approximation of the technique used.
It's not animatronic. It was a puppeted. There's a great documentary about the making of this film, and they discuss the creation of this "puppet" creature.
@@aaronsynra6867 Depends on what model... There were 4. 1 Large full puppet. 1 Large 1/2 stationary with animatronics. 1 Small puppet. 1 Small figurine. The documentary on the special Edition only shows the large full puppet as it was the most impressive. There are third party documentaries (i think Adam Savage did one) where you see parts of the others and it's fully discussed.
I mean Aliens and Jurassic Park is in a class of their own when it comes to practical effects. But, JP is a lot better when it comes to actual animatronics, Alien/s just did minimal footage and dark lighting to make it look good. The design of the Xenomorph is unmatched though
The first one is a horror movie. This one is more of a pure action movie. Which one people like more usually (but not always) depends on their genre preference.
A lesser director tasked with making a sequel to an all-time classic would have just recycled the original. James Cameron took a risk by making it an action movie with totally new characters and upping the ante by adding more aliens and the queen.
This film actually goes from being an action movie halfway to a survival movie once they get stranded on the planet and the rest of the film is them trying to survive and escape. Predator did the same thing the first half of the films are textbook actions films, while the second half devolves quickly into survival-horror
When James Cameron did something a little different with the Alien franchise, everyone loved it. When Jean-Pierre Jeunet did something a little different with the Alien franchise, everyone hated it. Except me. 😄
Alien: Horror Aliens: Action Alien... I don't know how I'm supposed to pronounce a title with superscript in it's name -- like is it Alien cubed? Alien to the third power? Alien (small high pitched voice) *three*... so I already feel hopeless and depressed: Nihilist Porn
I LOVE the mother vs. mother aspect of the storyline. It shows both are all in. Also Ripley an adoptive daughter right after she found out her biological daughter passed away. ❤
The extended cut is much, *much* better than the theatrical release (which is still amazing). The reasons why are: 1) More character development for Ripley, which adds more meaning to her deep connection with Newt. 2) Extra scenes at the colony, which show how thriving it was before it gets overrun. That makes the scene where the marines find Hadley's Hope completely deserted much more sinister. 3) Scenes with the colonists finding the alien ship, which shows it broken up by seismic activity on the planet. 4) The sentry gun turret scenes. Apart from just being incredibly cool, the sentry turrets explain why the aliens don't try to bust their way through the barricades just like they did with the colonists. After failing to get past the turrets, the aliens shut off power to the medlab and then come in through the ceiling, which shows how smart and adaptable they are.
Yea, the extended version gives you a little more background, though not much. The biggest difference were the automatic cannons they used first on the planet. I really liked those :-)
I largely agree. I could do without the colonists finding the ship, though. I find that it kneecaps some of the mystery when the marines start to investigate Hadley's Hope. Which I'll admit doesn't really make sense. I mean - we all know what's going on. Kinda. But it just feels to me like its more interesting touching down not having seen anything about the colonists at this point. It's a fair point about showing a thriving colony. It does make the empty spaces feel like they should be feeling less utilitarian and more lived in. Maybe if the edit showed the colony and stopped at the discovery scene. Dunno. YMMV.
@@arandomnamegoeshere Yeah, I get your point about the colonists finding the ship and the dad getting facehugged. It does undercut the suspense way too early. The only thing is, it's really cool to see the alien ship partly broken open, and there wouldn't be any reason to show it in the movie otherwise. One thing that the studios seem to have overlooked, is that the alien ship is *still* there on LV-426. There's no mention of the colonists blowing it up, and the ship is at least 100 miles away from the colony site (because it took the salvage team a week to get there).. so it wasn't destroyed when the reactor blows up. They could have used the alien ship as a source of eggs for the sequel, instead of the ridiculous plot hole egg that starts Alien 3. At least the magic egg makes Alien 3 and all the dross that came after it non-canon.
Fun fact: Jennette Goldstein (Vasquez) is a good friend of James Cameron. It's hard to believe she was the same woman to play the irish mother in the movie "Titanic". She's also in at least one more James Cameron film, but based on the comments, I'm assuming you haven't seen it yet, so...no spoilers.
The line in the movie when Hudson says "She heard Aliens and thought it meant Illegal Aliens and signed up" is an inside joke with the Cast about Jennette. When the casting came out she thought the Movie was about Illegal Aliens and showed up dressed like a Migrant for the Casting call......
Extended cut added much more meaning to the relationship of Ripley and Newt in the first few minutes of the film. Mind boggling that the studio cut it out.
It was because of those scenes getting cut is why Weaver almost didn't do Alien 3. She only relented when given executive producer credit as well as implementing her personal views on firearms ie she's anti-gun big time.
The studio didn't cut the scenes, Cameron wasn't the king of the world then and he was obliged to deliver a movie that didn't exceed a certain length. He got his director's cut released a few years later on home video - one of the first directors to make a habit of finishing a longer version for the future, starting with "Aliens." However Cameron saw to it that his extra scenes were finished and/or preserved he deserves a lot of credit for predicting the future. From the point of view of the studio, there was no reason to believe that "Aliens" would work anything like as well as it did. "Alien" was seven years before and Cameron had only done "Terminator" and "Piranha II" by this point.
No, I still prefer the original version. The surprise of shooting at a child was way more horrifying. Even the deceased daughter stuff is not really needed for a woman to protect and bond with a child.
Seeing this in '86 was the first time I'd experienced an audience cheering during a film. There were a number of moments that got a reaction but the two I remember are Hicks diving through the med-lab window and the reveal of Ripley in the loader.
Ripley is one of my favourite characters/heros in all movie history, she is up there with James Bond and Indiana Jones. Just a shame the character/story suffered after Aliens, but I have trouble deciding which of the two I like best as they are both excellent in their own way.
Stella, in the original film, the byline was "In space, no one can hear you scream". That movie was far more about the ominous atmosphere, and the suspense. That's why you hardly saw the alien in the first movie. They were going for more of an emotional reaction from audience in the first one. Whereas in this movie, it was more about the thrills, and the action; something James Cameron is known more than Ridley Scott who directed the first film.
Although you see a lot of the queen in aliens, you see even less of the warrior aliens in Cameron's film than you do in the first film. You see that there are multiple aliens, but they're always shrouded in shadows and darkness. In the last third of Alien, you see a lot of the creature, especially right at the end when Ripley blasts it with the ship exhaust.
@@Aquascape_Dreamingthat was because they only had five actors in the warrior suits so they had to digitally replicate them. It’s much easier to do have them in shadow.
I still prefer the theatrical version. I especially don't like the scene where Newt and her family go out to the derelict ship. It shows the facehugger too soon and it also makes it less surprising to find Newt later on.
@@nodak81 Same. In my opinion they didn't just cut that scene for time - they cut it so that it was less obvious that Aliens is actually more of a remake than a sequel. When you put that scene back in suddenly the cadence of plot elements looks a lot more like the first film.
@@nodak81 funny. acceptable point but i don't feel it. it's totally clear that they are going find aliens when they arrive later (and the we-lost-contact-scene is right after that scene), so no surprise to be spoiled (to me it rather builds up tension on what /exactly/ they are going to find). and it's also not clear that it is necessarily Newt to be found later on, could have just be a random family. also Newt's scream in that cut scene is one of the best in whole cinema history.
I like portions of both versions. My ultimate version would use scenes from both but especially delete the early family discovery, while leaving in that they went to check it out. So we'd see the colonists and know newts family went out there but we wouldn't see the family attacked.
One of my favorite movies of all time. Mom took my sister and I see this at the theater when I was 10 or 11. Was such a long adrenaline ride, my hands started shaking in the car on the way home. The very definition of an "edge of your seat" film. It was awesome.
By the end, it's pretty clear Ripley was irrational and would have done anything to save Newt, or kill herself trying. She had no personal investment in the soldiers.
I like how these two directors made two different films but were able to keep the lore and canon of the franchise. While two different directors made the previous Star Wars trilogy and completely undermind each other.
So true, the massive worldbuilding of the first movie really benefits this one, while this one also respects and builds upon the worldbuilding and plot of the first one. My biggest problem with the newest Star Wars was in EpVIII it felt like they were actively trying to delete certain threads of plot points and characters, and EpIX seemed like it was just trying to salvage what was left of a coherent story from the end of VIII, like they got written into a corner. These two movies along with the first two Terminator movies is definitely an example of how to do sequels right.
Okay let’s be fair this analogy sucks Making the sequel to a film is not the same as making a literal squeal trilogy to an existing trilogy. and to be even more fair, as much as i dislike the sequel trilogy Freaking Lucas destroyed his own lore and cannon with the prequels and Medioclorians destroying everything about the force turning the Jedi from warrior monks who kept peace to literal video game superheroes who were almost invulnerable (until plot needed them not to be) and could wipe out entire armies single handed.
@@mckenzie.latham91 Personally I've never found Midichlorians to have ruined the lore. It was assumed from the end of Return of the Jedi that force sensitivity was apparently inheritable when Luke says the force is strong in his family, Midichlorians just add a layer of mild science to that idea that a Jedi's force abilities are a mixture of genetic sensitivity and Jedi training honing that natural gift. But yes making them hold their own in combat against hundreds may have been good for spectacle but it did admittedly ruin the mystery a bit. However the new sequels didn't even get basic character consistency right, they immediately made characters irrelevant or killed them off in episode VIII and cut off different themes in favour of focusing on a slow chase, and then episode IX has hundreds of ships helping them even though they had no backup answer them in VIII, the plot was all over the place.
It's so funny how people are talking about the world-building and lore of Ridley Scott's Alien. Guys, it's one of the most perfect films ever made, but it's a b-movie script treated with a-movie sensibilities. It's a b-movie with big money, good actors and a good director riding on the tailcoats of other recent sci-fi movies. It's simple, straightforward and trying to scare you. Not build a world. And if the lore is what gave us Prometheus, i don't need it. 😄
@@G1NZOU "Personally I've never found Midichlorians to have ruined the lore.” Good for you but you are wrong, it as literally been proven to totally retcon everything in Empire The force goes from a living energy field that exist sin all things, that the Jedi were just trained to tap into to literal organisms that have to exist in humanoid bodies, and how many of these organisms exist in you controls how powerful you are in the force Which is essentially Dragon Ball Z Power levels “Even master Yoda doesn’t have a medichlorian count of over 20 thousand” etc. It’s ridiculous, ruins the mysticism and everything meaningful about the force and totally ignores the message. At that point Star war was ruined the only ting that saved the Prequels in terms of relevance to the overall franchise, was the expanded universe and the numerous cartoons and stories centered around it, to actually make it make sense, give it purpose and literally flush out what Lucas couldn’t get right or be betted to care about, in the films. That's the only saving grace. "It was assumed from the end of Return of the Jedi that force sensitivity was apparently inheritable when Luke says the force is strong in his family,” The force exists in everything and everyone, but like any traits, those who are strong in the force pass that on that has nothing to do with medchlorians And in the original trilogy you could be strong in the force and not be a Jedi When Vader is chasing Luke in the death star trench he says, “the force is strong with this one” he had no idea it was a Jedi or Luke/his son, which was the hint that you don't need to be a jedi to be in the force or have the force That was changed after Lucas made the prequels and basically regulated everyone who has force abilities or force sensitive is somehow only that way because they have power levels. Star wars was killed long before Disney had control Cause Lucas forgot his roots, threw away the idea of collective filmmaking and was so obsessed with what shinny sterile toys he could make and do with his green/blue screens and computers, that he forgot the key to actual good film making is real substance, good or at least focussed writing, and knowing when to stop adding on to your already established and perfect work to try and appear edgy and profound. Funnily enough the exact same lessons the people who did the sequel trilogy failed to learn as well.
She can drive a loader because she learned working at the warehouse that they mentioned before. She didn't just wake up and go back, she tried to reintergrate into society before being called back, finding a job.
So the extended version has a scene at the beginning where Ripley is told her RL daughter died of cancer. This was an important detail to give better insight on why Ripley bonded so much with Newt and was incredibly protective of her. It also made sense why she understand Newt's capacity since her RL daughter was Newt's age in the first Alien movie.
Also: the picture they use for Ripley’s daughter(Amanda in-film), who was an older woman by the time Ripley was found, was played by Sigourney Weaver’s real life mother, Elizabeth Ingrid.
Also, in a deleted scene, as Ripley is trying to find Newt in the nest, she finds Burke cocooned and already impregnated with an Alien embryo, Burke begs Ripley to kill him… she looks him dead in the face, then ignores his cries and just leaves him, and goes on to find Newt lol… that’s should have made the extended❤❤❤
also explains why Ripley wiped out the eggs in the nest in front of the queen instead of just booking it back to the ship and watching the nuclear fireball: payback
And let's not forget this movie was made before any real CGI, mostly using very complex puppeteering and using miniatures, but despite all of that, this movie, brought out in 1986, made in 1985, is now 38 years old, but aged pretty well. Even after all these years, this movie is still so well done.
46:25to expand on the "mother" theme. This was a great scene where the mother of the aliens stares down Ripley who is Newt's surrogate mother. They don't say anything to each other but they both have that "you hurt mine, I hurt yours" vibe
58:08 "I dont know if your arms are stronger than the vacuum of space" .. To give some physics answer here: its actually the other way around. Vacuum actually doesnt have any "force" (even when it seems like). Its actually the airpressure, which "goes" into space. That air pressure is 13 pounds per square inch. The wind speeds when that hatch opens are from the air molecules itself (which at room temperature moves around the speed of sound (thats actually also the reason for the speed of sound in the air) - meaning: the windspeed = speed of sound, when the hatch to the vacuum of space opens. And the force, as i said is 13 pounds per square inch of Ripley.. because her body is right laying in the direction of the windspeed - meaning thats around 100 square-inch of surface against the air.. 100 times 13 pounds would be 1300 pounds she has to hold with her arms. So in conclusion: you are right... realisticly spoken, she would not be able to hold herself in that situation - not even for a second. And thats only if she would hold herself only. But the Alien queen is also holding on her. But 1300 pounds on one arm exceeds by far even the strongest men on earth. It would be at least enough to dislocate the shoulder... probably even rip the arm off. So... very good observation about that movie-mistake. Also - because the air would go out into space with the speed of sound, this also means : from that big door - the air from that spaceship - regardless how big it is, would be out in no time. And that would mean Ripley, Newt and Hicks would be unconscious in 15-20 seconds tops (and thats only if they were smart and exhale as much as possible, BEFORE the vacuum comes). If they hold their breath, the airpressure in their lungs would literally rip their ripcage apart, when the vacuum comes, and they would die from it immediately. So the only very slim chance to survive for 15-20 seconds spacevacuum is: to exhale as much as possible, before the vacuum comes.
I was living in LA in the late 80s. I met Michael(Hicks)Biehn twice. A super nice guy! The first time was in a Hotel Lobby in San Francisco. Aliens was about to come out and I couldn't wait, because I was a Sci-Fi nerd and loved The Terminator and Alien. I walked up to him, he was surrounded by girls asking for autographs, I shoved my way through them and shook his hand. I said "I think you're a brilliant actor". He said "Thanks". He asked my name. I replied. Then walked away and left him to the girls. A year later I was in a bar in Hollywood and saw Michael standing at the bar and having a beer. So I walked up to him again and said I met him before. He said he remembered but forgot my name. He didn't remember he was just being nice. We then had a long conversation about acting and sports over a couple of beers. Should have been a bigger star. He's great at playing the best good guy like Hicks or Kyle Reese in "The Terminator". He is great a playing the best bad guy like Lt.Coffey in "The Abyss" or Jonny Ringo in "Tombstone". Few actors pull that off.
I often see comments about Bill Paxton being the only actor killed by an Alien, a Predator and a Terminator (btw Lance Henriksen too), but Michael Biehn is the one in love with Sarah Connor and Ellen Ripley, the most iconic female action heroes....
Michael Biehn is a fantastic actor , all of his movies are so good . He's a convincing , likeable , realistic guy the movies he plays in . He should have gotten more credit and recognition as the great actor he really is . Sounds like a super nice guy in real life too !
I'm so stoked that you two are continuing on with the franchise! I absolutely love all these movies. They all have different vibes but are worth watching.
I usually don't watch reaction videos this long, but it's so entertaining watching your genuine reactions and great comments afterwards. Keep up the good work!
16:40 In the Director's Cut there's extra scenes that show how Burke took the information from Ripley's hearing, and instructed colonists to go out to the alien ship, but without telling them what would be out there. Right from the start, Burke was after bringing an alien back.
The sub-plot of Ripley and Newt is awesome. Ripley out-lived her daughter and Newt lost her mother, so they fulfilled a missing part of each of their lives. I love that part of the story. Newt calling Ripley "Mommy" at the end was just a great way to end their story in the film. Great film. The extended cut has scenes showing Newt with her family interacting with a face hugger, which I'm glad it's not in the theatrical cut as you learn about Newt a little bit at a time.
6:44 - Looks like you're watching the theatrical cut. The Director's Cut adds in a lot of footage left out of the original, including a scene here where we get to see the colony thriving before the inevitable happens. We also learn about Ripley's daughter, who lived to old age and died 3 years before Ripley was found. (Incidentally, Ripley's daughter is the protagonist of the 2014 video game Alien: Isolation.) 12:30 - You may have missed this, but actually several weeks/months have passed since she woke up. Like Burke said, she's been working as a cargo loader in the space docks since then. Even if she hadn't been familiar with this equipment before, she's had time to learn. 18:51 - Would YOU be after the s#$% she's seen? 23:03 - This is what Xenomorphs do when they reach sufficient numbers to form a colony. First they secrete the same resinous material that makes up their exoskeletons and use it to turn their current location into a Hive. This resinous shell not only helps turn the climate into one more suited to their metabolism, but it acts as highly effective camouflage because it is the same material as their exoskeletons sculpted into shapes that mimic their own lines. 26:21 - This is what we in the 40K fandom call 'Exterminatus.' 27:16 - So I'm going to mention this here. One of the things you miss out on not seeing the Director's Cut is the development of the relationship between Hicks and Ripley that starts here. You get bits of it, but not enough to see where it's supposed to be going. 32:00 - As I mentioned earlier, the Director's Cut shows the colony receiving that message and going out to investigate. 39:59 - GAME OVER, MAN! GAME OVER!! 44:13 - This scene is slightly extended in the Director's Cut and serves as the wrap-up for the development of Ripley and Hick's relationship. The highlight of the scene is finally learning Ripley's first name: Ellen. Aliens established the core of the Xenomorph lore. Although the later Promethius movies would attempt to expand the background, most of the lore development from here on took place in comics, video games, and other forms of media. Probably the biggest thing to happen to expand the lore of the xenomorphs actually happened in a different movie franchise from the same era. The original movie series has two more films: Alien 3 and Alien: Resurrection. A prequel duology exists: Prometheus and Alien: Covenant. They're...different. You can take them or leave them. What you DO need to watch are the Predator movies: Predator 1 and 2. I know the guys watched 1, you should try to get in on 2 when they watch it. After that there's the Alien Vs. Predator series.
There's a book that explains why she was lost for 57 years. The director's cut is better as it has more background on Ripley and Newt's family. I always thought these marines were specially picked by the "Company" because they were f-ups and not the top of the line..which suited the company's agenda. There is a cut scene that shows Ripley coming across a cocooned Burke.
The casting of Paul Reiser in Stranger Things season 2 was one of the clever things about it, particularly since the entire season (or at least the parts taking place at the research facility) had a very Aliens vibe to it (it even threw in the "Stray frosty," line when the soldiers were exploring the gateway). Everyone who had seen Aliens was just waiting for him to turn out to be a rat who was going to screw everyone over to save his own skin. Then we were shocked to find he actually had a heart. In fact, he was about the only one who had a heart in that entire installation. Hah. Oh, and as for her being able to drive the loader 57 years later? That's because that's her job, now. That's what Burke was talking to her about when he said he saw she'd gotten a new job (I think that's great!). A lot of time passes between when she has that meeting with the company and when contact is lost with the colony, which unfortunately isn't conveyed as well in the theatrical release as it is in the extended version.
This was Carrie Henns (Newt) only major acting role. After this movie her parents moved back to the United States from London and she basically gave up acting. After high school she pursued a career in education and is currently teaching grade four in the California school system. Her and Sigourney Weaver remained friends and maintain contact with each other to this day. 😊
17:59 In the extended version, the girl's family, alongside her brother, ends up finding the torus-looking ship from the first film, and her father gets caught by a facehugger. The rest is history.
Hey, Stella and Haley! This is one of the best sequels ever made! Unfortunately, you didn't see the superior SPECIAL EDITION which has the Amanda Ripley scene, the functioning colony scene, Newt's family's discovery of the derelict ship scene, the automated gun scene, the Hudson speculation about queen ants scene and the name exchange scene. The SPECIAL EDITION is the version both James Cameron and Sigourney Weaver prefer. The future Ripley inhabits is implied to be a dystopic corporatocracy. The most pervasive and powerful corporate entity is the Weyland-Yutani Company, a 22nd-century version of the British East India Company of the 17th- to 19th-centuries. It is a multinational conglomerate involved in robotics, interstellar transport and terraforming with a stake in every colony world. The Company is the TRUE VILLAIN of the Alien universe. Ash and Burke were following a secret corporate mandate to obtain a xenomorph specimen in order to profit from research and weaponization. The colonists who venture beyond the compound like Newt's parents are prospectors who can lay a claim to any discovery they make. The Company would get a large percentage of the find but the colonist would own a piece. A valuable ore would mean a fortune! After Burke heard Ripley's story, he contacted the colony boss to dispatch someone to the coordinates Ripley had indicated in her report with no warning of danger. He must have done a little digging and found out about the Company Directive to investigate any possible sign of intelligent life and to bring back a specimen. He sent Newt's family straight to the derelict ship. Neither Hicks nor Apone were treating Ripley in a sexist manner when she offered to help prep. They regarded her as a civilian. They were both accustomed to females in their unit such as medic Dietrich, pilot Ferro and heavy-gunner Vasquez. When she demonstrates her proficiency with the loader, they were laughing good-naturedly at her bravado and their own underestimation of her abilities. Some trivia: The picture of Ripley's elderly daughter in the Special Edition is actually Sigourney Weaver's real-life mother! The late Al Matthews, who played Sgt. Apone, was a true-blue Marine who was the first black man to be promoted to Sergeant in the Corps during his service in Vietnam! The knife-trick scene was originally supposed to be performed by Lance Henriksen alone but he convinced director James Cameron to surprise Bill Paxton by involving him as they shot the scene! Paxton's wide-eyed terror is completely real! Fan favorite Vasquez is played by non-Hispanic Jenette Goldstein! She goes out like a warrior and enables Gorman to reclaim his honor. Ms. Goldstein now is the proprietress of a Los Angeles-based boutique that specializes in bespoke large-size bras! The motto of her company is, "At Jenette's, the alphabet begins with 'D'."! Bishop's programming to not harm humans or allow them to come to harm through inaction is ripped straight from Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics! Carrie Henn, who played Newt, never acted again but became a schoolteacher. She still maintains a correspondence relationship with Sigourney Weaver thirty-six years later. The late Bill Paxton, who has the distinction of being attacked on screen by an Alien, a Terminator and a Predator, will NEVER be forgotten for his reading of the line, "Why don't you put HER in charge?", referring to little Newt in her oversized helmet. Lol. "ALIEN 3: ASSEMBLY CUT" is a DIVISIVE film but it's an EXCELLENT entry in the series. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND YOU SEE IT!!! Many will try to dissuade you but it is ESSENTIAL VIEWING! It's directed by David Fincher and features Charles Dance and Charles Dutton. It's brutal, fast-paced, has a solid cast, has some extraordinary scares, provides new insight into the creature, presents a fascinating dilemma and concludes the trilogy elegantly. I strongly encourage you NOT TO SKIP IT! Make sure you see the ASSEMBLY CUT (Special Edition with longer runtime). It is available on Redbox and right here on YT. "Alien Resurrection" is the optional one because it's a hot mess except for one cool aquatic sequence. The ambitious prequels, "Prometheus" and "Covenant", mark director Ridley Scott's return to the series but they are mostly good JUST for Michael Fassbender's performances. Scott demystifies the creature and unsatisfyingly attempts to address who the elephant-headed pilot of the derelict spacecraft was. If you intend to see the "ALIEN vs. PREDATOR" films, then you need to acquaint yourself with the PREDATOR franchise. The first is an action classic with Schwarzenegger. Danny Glover's underrated urban-set "PREDATOR 2" features some memorable set pieces. Dark Horse comics explored the crossover concept inspiring Hollywood to make two crossover films with moderately successful to excellent results. They're fun and exciting guilty pleasures with the second one, "ALIENS vs. PREDATOR: REQUIEM", being particularly lean and mean. There is also a "PREDATORS" film produced by Robert Rodriguez that is definitely worth a look. "THE PREDATOR" (2018) REBOOT, however, nearly killed the franchise and should be approached with a great deal of trepidation! "PREY" is an 18th-century-set prequel to the original film that was released on Hulu last summer! The Alien films have a RICHER SUBTEXT while the Predator films are more ACTION FARE but they're both fun sci-fi thrillers. VIEWING ORDER: Alien Aliens (Special Edition) Alien 3 (Assembly Cut) Alien Resurrection (Director's Cut) [OPTIONAL] Predator (1987) Predator 2 Predators Prey Alien vs. Predator Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (Unrated) Prometheus [OPTIONAL] Covenant [OPTIONAL] The Predator (2018) [EXTREMELY OPTIONAL] INTERNAL CHRONOLOGY: 1719 Prey 1987 Predator 1997 Predator 2 2004 Alien vs. Predator 2004 Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (Unrated) 2010 Predators 2018 The Predator [EXTREMELY OPTIONAL] 2093 Prometheus [OPTIONAL] 2104 Covenant [OPTIONAL] 2122 Alien 2179 Aliens (Special Edition) 2179 Alien 3 (Assembly Cut) 2379 Alien Resurrection (Director's Cut) [OPTIONAL]
I would have preferred the extended version, it has some scenes that add a lot more context to it, especially the relation between Ripley and Newt. Ellen Ripley had a daughter when she left earth, roughly the same age as Newt. After she was found after 57 years, she learned that her daughter died before she was found. So saving Newt has a much deeper meaning for Ripley to what is shown in this version. And hits much harder when Newt calls her "Mommy" at the end. Also a lot of scenes how the settlers found that alien ship you know from the first Alien movie. It was Newts dad who was the first victim of a facehugger. Besides that, a few more fight scenes which are quite intense. IMHO worth considering making a second reaction video with the extended.
The special edition is the version Cameron originally wrote and intended for the audience to see, and the favorite for most fans. Some freaks prefer the theatrical for some twisted "reasons."
FYI, the late, great Bill Paxton's in another great horror/suspense thriller with Matthew McConaughey called "Frailty" (2001). It also stars Powers Boothe (of Sin City). You two would truly enjoy that film; great story.
The fun fact the scene in Cantine after the Marines and Ripley wake up was the last scene they made, the actors had known each other for months now so that's why is so like family banters, jokes, and laughs.
I loved the part where the Marine was saying how they were all toast and Ripley says, "This little girl survived here for weeks with no weapons and no training."
But see, I also think that had another meaning, much more sinister: I believed that the only reason Newt was left alone, was because, the Queen and the colony had taken every one else-- they didn’t need her… and when Ripley and the Marines came, it might have been the only thing that kept her from eventually being taken by them… as new eggs were hatched and new Xenomorphs were born.
There is some time that passes between Ripley getting picked up and her being convinced to go back. During which she had her flight rank and license stripped. That's where she learned to pilot the power loader, working in a dockyard.
What I love about the final fight is that the loader is not intended as a weapon. It's strong, sure, but it's slow and has little protection. That improvisational aspect (reinforced by her use of the blowtorch) really displays Ripley's resourcefulness and makes that scene. Wonderful.
You both wondered how Ripley knew how to use the Power Loader. The company man mentions when he comes to her for help that she's been working down at the docks. That where she got her license. I think the debate between the 2 films has always been a little muted as they are different genres; psych-horror and action-horror. Each one is a superb example of their respective genres.
Meh, I don't even think of Aliens as horror at all. You can't really call it horror when the beast so mysterious and deadly from the first film is killed multiple times within the movie - that's why they had to up the ante with the Alien queen, and even then it didn't really work for me. Aliens reduces the mystery beast into a merely dangerous animal requiring just enough firepower to take down - in this way I would credit Cameron as the beginning of the demystifying of the xenomorph, and not in any kind of positive way.
@@mnomadvfx Mysterious and inexplicable things do inspire horror, but so do implacable, inhuman and powerful things. The girls even say it in their reaction, something to the effect that the group left after the disastrous hive attack are clever, careful and competent...and still outmatched. That is it's own brand of horror.
Wait, Jennifer Lawrence said she was the first female action hero in any movie. How, then, can Ripley be such a kick ass, well written, character driven hero (not to mention, amazingly, plays a maternal influence as well) exist before Jennifer Lawrence? Anyway, yes this movie, Godfather II, Terminator 2, Empire Strikes Back.....doesn't get better.
Makes no sense. Al Pacino was the lead in Godfather 2. There was no female lead. Arnold Schwarzenegger was the lead in Terminator 2. I guess you could argue Linda Hamilton was. And Mark Hamil and Harrison Ford were the leads in The Empire Strikes Back. Carrie Fisher didn’t even want to come back for the sequels….
@@hannahstevenson27 Well, to clarify, because it seems you need some here evidently. There are two issues being pointed out here: 1. Lawrence's ridiculous and ignorant interview where she stated she, unbelievably, stated she was the first female action hero in a movie. I was pointing out how Weaver played an ICONIC FEMALE action hero 30 YEARS prior. Number 2: just listing a number of usual suspects in cases where the sequel is, arguably, better than the original. In addition, to add fuel to your fire, Hamilton is ABSOLUTELY written and has a logical, well developed, character arc which makes her another classic movie hero. My point was Hollywood can't do this kind of thing today, regardless how much Jennifer Lawrence refuses to acknowledge it was actually done SUCCESSFULLY before she was even born
@@louisenglish8069 I read somewhere that Jennifer Lawrence was actually referring to the YA genre, which Hunger Games is, and not movies in general. So yes, she probably IS the first real kick-ass female lead in a YA-based movie.
Not to be forgotten among those great sequels - 'Star Trek 2 : The Wrath of Khan'. What a freaking masterpiece of a movie. I've seen it at least 100 times and that final act still guts me every time (you know which scene).
19:47 "Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen!" is a more gentle version of "Drop your cocks and grab your socks!" as Bill Paxton couldn't say that phrase in front of Newt (Carrie Henn). In every scene where he had to swear, once they cut, he would apologize profusely to Carrie for swearing in front of her. Bill and Keanu are the few class acts left in Hollywood. RIP.
There was a difference in vision between the first Alien directed by Ridley Scott and Aliens directed by James Cameron. This was the first time an actress was nominated for Best Actress for playing a character in a movie sequel as well....
Throughly enjoyed watching a younger generation of women discovering the Aliens series, specifically Ripley. She was my generations first woman movie hero. Her character really displays how to be courageous and bold, even when facing a monster.
The late composer James Horner wrote this score in a little over a week since they weren’t done filming/editing. His score garnered an Oscar Nomination.
Good reaction as always girls. You should see the director's cut it explians why Ripley got so attached to Newt so quickly and a few other things as well. The actor of Kyle Reese from the first Terminator movie is here as the one that survives with Ripley and Newt,which is cool and Lopaz is the actress of John's adopted mother in Terminator 2. The parts where Lopaz is shooting the aliens is not the actress but in fact it was James's wife at the time as a stand in for her. These two are the best and honostly I think you could just end things here and not watch the ones that came next. The actors got to design their own armor so each of them have something personal on it which is an interesting idea. If you have both not seen Terminator 1 and 2 then I highly suggest you do so because they are both amazing movies. I loved this one so much though it takes more of an action side than horror but still interesting and by the way the part where they have Bishop play the knife game with Bill Paxton's character the fear on his face was real because he had no idea they would use his own hand for it also if you pay close attention you will see that the footage was sped up so that it looks like bishop is doing so with unhuman speed which is an interesting way to do things.
"You should see the director's cut it explians why Ripley got so attached to Newt so quickly and a few other things as well" Yesn't. The Ripley of the first movie went back for a cat. A frickin cat - and she tried to go back for her last 2 crew knowing that they were under attack, only to find them dead. She was already demonstrated to be a good person by these actions in Alien. If anything setting a requirement on her goodness from Newt being an emotional replacement for her daughter makes Ripley LESS of a good person. Also the latino Marine woman with the gimballed smart gun is called Vasquez, not Lopaz. I would agree about not watching Alien Resurreciton, but Alien 3 is fine as long as it is the Assembly Cut - unlike Aliens it actually has an original plot 😅
@@mnomadvfx You were probably not paying attention, but in the first movie there was only one alien, and Ripley had a working flamethrower. On this one, there are hundreds of aliens and Ripley has limited ammo. Also, on the first one Ripley was just reacting, not having time to process everything. On this one, she's clearly traumatized. She had the time to relive her nightmares again and again. So going into the aliens' nest to rescue Newt is a big deal. It's not just because she's a "good person."
I believe Ripley had a Class 2 Loader Rating NOW rather than 57 years ago. There would be no need for a Warrent Officer in her Nostromo position to have one OR she would have similar knowledge/rating of other equipment to update her rating 57 years after. ❤your Horror Reactions!!!!
A fact I will forever love about this movie is how James Cameron pitched it. He met the execs, wrote ALIEN in caps, added an S at the end, then turned the S into a $. The pitch took less than 30 seconds.
53:00 "The upper body strength of this woman." and "I don't know if your arms are stronger than the vacuum of space." I'll tell you the science so this scene won't be so hard to believe: There is no vacuum in space. Not the way you're thinking. Space is just empty. It doesn't "suck" like the vacuum cleaner in your home. It doesn't have "strength" at all. It's just empty. When you are in a ship in space, the air pressure inside the ship is probably around 0.8 atm (atmospheric pressure). That's about equal to the atmospheric pressure in Denver, Colorado, USA (this city is about 1 mile or 1.6 km above sea level). The atmospheric pressure of space is 0 atm. The difference between inside and outside is 0.8 atm. Now, imagine you're on an ocean beach somewhere and you're sipping some delicious drink through a straw. The difference between the air inside your mouth and outside your mouth is pretty close to 0.8 atm, give or take. That's it. Ripley is climbing that ladder against forces just about as strong as the force you put on your delicious drink when you suck it up a straw. If your cheeks are that strong, I bet your arms are too. OK, OK, it's not quite that simple. Ripley opened a big door. Space is not "sucking" the air out because space doesn't have any way to "suck" anything. The air in the ship is going out the door because air ALWAYS flows from higher pressure areas to lower pressure areas. All gasses and liquids do that. With that much air blowing past Ripley, Newt, and Bishop, that's creating wind as the blows past them pretty fast. How much wind? I did some googling and the best info I could find from a bunch of science and math geeks is something like 100-120 mph winds. But that's only during the first instant. That number drops immediately as there is less and less air in the ship so the wind slows down. Also, the door didn't open instantly. It slid open over a few seconds. So the initial wind would be slower, getting stronger, up to a max of 120 mph but since some air leaked out while the door was slowly opening, it would never really hit that max. So maybe 100, maybe 110 mph. That is equal to a strong hurricane. Strong enough to knock over fences and trees and maybe even flatten some houses. That's a lot. But those things are all like big sails and those winds are hitting a huge surface. Ripley's head is not a sail and it's a much smaller surface. More googling led me to a university meteorology site which told me that terminal velocity to lift an average person up and blow them away is around 120 mph. If you're standing and get with with a wind roughly 70-110 mph, it will probably knock you to the ground but won't blow you away, unless you're a child or smaller than average adult. That doesn't include holding onto things. If you're holding onto a solid stationary object, it takes extra wind force equal to your arm strength. If you can lift 50 pounds with one arm, then add that 50 pounds to the force it takes to break your grip and blow you away. That takes us up to 170 mph. But the actual force on Ripley is much lower than that, so she should be fine. To summarize, the wind force blowing against Ripley is almost but quite not enough to blow her out the airlock if she's just sleeping on the ground. And if she's holding onto something, no chance, it won't blow her out. Is she strong enough to climb against that much wind? Remember, the force is dwindling every second, so every second it gets easier to climb. In that case, it seems believable. Final thought: I'm much more worried about whether there's enough air in the ship for Ripley, Newt, and Hicks to breathe after so much blew out. I'm sure the ship has extra air in tanks. How fast can it restore atmosphere? Scary thought. But after consideration, this is a military ship. I assume it has been built with the idea that other ships might shoot at it and make holes in it. So it has systems to automatically close airtight doors and pump reserve air into any area that needs it. Thanks for the question! I had fun researching this; hopefully somebody has fun reading it.
Fun reaction! The facial expressions were gold lol. The director's cut is almost a different movie. So much more was put in. To me it actually moves faster than the theatrical. And the aliens are in it more.
Really thoughtful reaction, and you two have a nice dynamic. I imagine I'm not alone in saying it would be good to see more reactions with you both together
The great thing about the Alien franchise is how different all of the films are. Overall, this is probably the best film in the series, production-wise at least but I'm sure you'll find plenty to appreciate in Alien 3 as well. Hope to see the reaction soon! Best wishes!
You should’ve watched the extended cut. It would’ve filled you in on Ripley’s loss of her daughter who grew old and died waiting for her mother to come home. And why she’s attached to Newt
Great movie that just doesn’t really age much at all. I think it’s good to remember the context. A lot of the themes and storylines that seem run of the mill to us now weren’t cliched back then. There have been so many movies that have come out in the 37 years since this was released, that have been inspired by and borrow from Alien and Aliens. These two movies along with Terminator revamped the sci-fi/horror genre, so you can’t really call think of them as “run of the mill”. They pretty much are the mill that established the standard. As a kid Ellen Ripley and Indiana Jones were my favorite action heroes by far. I haven’t seen any characters that approach them in their appeal since.
In the special edition she asked for he daughter, but they tell her that she died because was old like 70 years some like that , and she cried, that s why she feels some feelings for the child
You really need to see the cut portions of the movie. Ripley finding out about her daughter, the scenes on Hadley's Hope and the iconic and most well known deleted scene, The Sentry Guns. Also on the gear the marines have, it's common practice for marines of the USCM to customise their gear. It's great to see people discover this movie and enjoy it but take it from me, watch the directors cut, it is so much better and adds a ton of context with the new scenes added.
I saw this in the theater when it came out. One of the best theater experences of my life with everybody cheering and screaming as it goes between horror and kick ass action. This sadly is where the Alien movies end as far as being worth watching. Everything past this point is pretty bad.
@@group-music Stick with the voices in your head. 🤣 There are thousands of ratings and reviews to pick from, and not one of them will claim that turd "3" is better than Aliens
Alien 3 is well worth checking out. Especially if you can find the assembly cut. Its a totally different vibe again. Almost has a stage play feel. And a cinematic directorial debut for the fantastic david fincher.
Yes, a little reverse psychology. Set them up as assholes, then humanise them, then you don't know where your emotions are, and that's exactly how they pull you in further. They set you up to make assumptions and then destroy them in front of your face.
In the early 1990s in my home city Glasgow//Scotland they had an attraction called 'Alien War' located in the massive caverns underneath our main railway station where the colonial marines would escort you around a cool mockup of the aliens-esq set trying to escape the Aliens was a pretty cool experience.
15:25 I am totally convinced that neither of you were willing to look at the screen when, in _Alien_ (1979), Ripley torched the entire crew that the Xenomorph had taken alive into the air ducts and was converting to facehugger eggs. You have to watch the movies to see them.
The debate rages on about whether the sequel is better than the original, but one thing that I think most people can agree on is that the first two Alien films are classic sci-fi films.
Yeah, exactly this!
Both great, the first one is slow burn sci-fi horror, atmospheric and more creepy, this one is like an action movie and faster pace, and a bigger production.
I like Alien for introducing the story and Aliens for taking it up a notch. One sets the other up so both are important. They definitely lost all momentum in A3 and onwards. Ended up becoming a purely nerdy thought experiment.
@ThaUltimateHunter It wasn't the editing that bothered me but the way they killed off Newt. It broke the lore of the story and didn't advance it at all. I understand if they did it because they couldn't use the actor in real life. That's a shame. Would have been better just not to do the movie at all. In the comics Newt lives on and has adventures of her own.
Agreed, Ridley Scott always seems to prefer the H.R Giger horror route, while Cameron here decided to do an action thriller.
Ladies, great reaction. The reason Ripley could drive the loader is that was her job on the space station after she was rescued and lost her flight status, so the technology is not in question. I adore this movie, and Ripley's character is a role model not only for women, but for men as well.
I imagine also that being the third in command of the Nostromo meant she was intelligent, adaptable, and competent, so while she had to learn to operate some new gear in her new job she's definitely the kind of person who can learn quick and do what needs to be done to make ends meet.
I totally agree that Ripley is a role model for competence, it's very clear she's absolutely terrified after her previous encounter with the Xenomorph so her final actions of bravery feel much more meaningful, she's afraid but dealing with the fear and not just unafraid due to false confidence or ignorance of the threat.
@@G1NZOU Great point, and great comment. I agree 100%!!!
@@G1NZOUIf you're a Warrant Flight Officer than is rated to pilot a starfreighter, learning to be a Power Loader operator will be no problem. It is akin to being an Airline Pilot who loses his flight license and has to make do and retrain as a Warehouse Forklift Operator. Nothing to do with being in Third-in-Command of the Nostromo. Her place in the Chain-of-Command was contingent on being the Flight Officer in the first place.
@@Ryan_Christopher Yes I agree, my point was she was already competent and well trained, and as a flight officer in general in modern day is meant to be adaptable, adjusting to be a forklift operator and transferring common sense skills like culture of safety and checklists would be a piece of cake.
As a grown-ass man, Ellen Ripley is one of my favorite movie characters ever.
In the extended version Ripley had a daughter that died before she returned home. Which I think make her relationship with Newt have so much more depth.
But it also acted as somewhat of a spoiler of what they (the space marines and Ripley) would encounter on the planet -- I prefer the original.
@@fewwiggle "Spoiler"
That there would be aliens in Aliens like the one we already saw in the first film? Also that's a completly different scene.
Yeah trade off of losing the scene with Ripley's daughter dying before she got back and missing the scene that spoils what happens on the colony. If there's a cut that includes the daughter scene and axes the colony scene, that is the best of the bunch.
fun fact, this daughter of hers is the character you play as in alien isolation
@@fewwiggle I perfer the second one. The characters are so much more interesting and emotional.
Lt. Ellen Ripley is the personification of a strong woman on film. She's a woman that doesn't need to beat the crap and kill men to prove that she's a strong woman. She's a leader and a protector. Men will follow her because they trust her leadership. That is a good example of a strong woman on film.
And Sarah Connor
Thank God Jennifer Lawrence was there with these roles first to teach Weaver 🤣 🤣
@@didamnesia3575wasn't Jennifer Lawrence the first woman ever born?
We need less Yaass Slaaaay Queens and more Ellen Ripleys.
@@lewas91 You mean where everyone is a competent person who does not do wildly stupid things? It is the age old battle of two starkly different philosophies. 1) A rising tide lifts all boats or 2) Life is a zero-sum game where in order for me to get a bigger piece of the pie others have to get less.
Ripley, still the greatest action lady to grace the screen, a mother, a warrior and a survivor.
There is Beatrix Kiddo
I guess the name Sarah Connor is not known to you :)))
@@radupopescu2370I mean they're pretty much the same character.
@@allrequiredfields nope, Sarah started to became a human terminator at the end of T1, we can see that in T2. She's as lethal as a human can be, Ripley becomes that only in Alien: Resurrection.
Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Beatrix Kiddo, Imperator Furiosa, etc... all these Hollywood heroines have one thing in common: they're all characters. If you want a true female action star, gotta look into those who got established in Hong Kong: Michelle Yeoh, Cynthia Rothrock, Yukari Oshima, Moon Lee, etc...
Paul Reiser is the actor from this and "Stranger Things", and here's a fun fact: his performance was so believable in this that even his own mother was glad when he met his fate!
His entire character in Stranger Things played off the role from Aliens. You were supposed to be suspicious of him until it turned out that he's "an ok guy".
@@DzinkyDzink It's funny, because his role in this film was based on the same premise: he'd been known for TV sitcoms and was considered a likeable guy, so he was cast as the villain because people's initial reaction would be to trust him.
He also was the co-star of the sitcom Mad About You, along with Helen Hunt.
I believe he said that she cheered when he died.
Yes, it’s a fantastic performance by him, just as Joffrey did in Game of Thrones a few decades later. An excellent portrayal of a hate-able character.
'Get away from her you b**ch' - just an iconic line from one of the best leads in a sci fi action franchise ever (maybe THE best).
Terminator next for sure, another amazing leading lady with an equally fantastic (better) sequel..also from Jimmy Cams
The Directors cut is better in every way in my opinion. They use the few extra minutes here and there very well. They get into Ripley's Daughter who died 2 years before she is found, so the mommy reference makes much more sense. They show the outpost functioning before the alien ship is found. And you get a just a few more minutes of character development before the marines start dropping like flies. ;p
They also show how the ship was found by Newt's family, so she's been attached to this event since minute 1.
You were not born.
Some of the dialogue in it is crinchy af though
FUNFACT about Carrie Henn aka Newt. It was her first and only camera role she ever took. She became a grade school teacher instead but from time to time she gets fan letters and kids tell her, her praent's loved her in Aliens.
James Cameron was more cautious about the film environment toward Carrie than her actual parent's, meaning he was on her side all the time making her as comfortable as possible. Also she said that Sigorney became like her actual 2nd mom for the time and she loves her.
Its all said in the cast reunion at comicon 2016. RIP Bill "Hudson" Paxton 🥺😢
Jenette also really didn't do much in hollywood after this movie. She was so great in it i expected much more out of her, but wasn't to be. She did a bunch of cameos and 2 bit roles but based on her in Aliens i would have thought she would have a much bigger career. Good looking, curvy, young, and her first role such a good one? Nope.
@@eolsunder at least James casted her for Terminator 2 again.
If Bill Paxton's gravestone doesn't read "Game over, man...Game over" that makes me even more sad
I bet kids are terriffied. Imagine YOUR parents told you "Tell your teacher i loved her in Aliens"
Ripley is what people should aspire to be: Strong, intelligent, and adaptive when they need to be, vulnerable enough to admit they need someone to help at times.
Ripley it's what all heros should strive to be.
Yeah, I'm so tired of Gen Z saying there are no strong woman characters. There always have been. Stop bitching just for bitching. Princess Lea was no wimp either
That final fight with the exosuit is still one of my favorite scenes in all of cinema, with one of the best ore asskicking lines.
It's cool to me that Cameron got his start with an FX demo if a woman in an exoskeleton fighting a robot. Which kinda made it into his first two mainstream movies in a way.
Ripley learned to drive a power loader when she was working on the docks when they took away her flight officer status. Burke mentioned she was driving loaders in her current job.
They were talking over a lot of the little details...I hope they will watch it again.
Personally I always had a bit of an issue with this only because it had been many years realtime since she had used one and based on how things update and change in reality it only makes sense that the power loader would have had multiple updates and changes over 50+ years
@@stormywaters1565 she used them after they found her in space.
@@stormywaters1565 it hadn't been many years. She took a job at the docks because she could no longer be a flight officer (remember Burke saying he knew it was the best job she could get). She learned to use a loader for the job at the docks. So, she only used a loader for the time between when she lost her officer position and they came asking her to return to the planet. Though they don't specify how much time that was, it was obviously enough time for her to achieve a class 2 rating on the power loader.
@@richardb6260 ah yeah ok I was always puzzled by that but makes sense now. The movie doesn't do a great job of making it evident a good bit of time had passed between her return home and departure.
Sigourney Weaver's in another really fun Sci-Fi movie called, "Galaxy Quest". It is really funny.
Best Star Trek EVER!!!
God yes. Please do Galaxy Quest. NOT. Aliens 3!
Alien 3 was just plain sad. Nothing really exciting. Just depressing from the start to finish. I try to pretend it doesn't exist, lol...
@@shannanmuire The Dark Horse comics continuity makes it especially easy to ignore the following (comparatively terrible) later movies. Absolutely more enjoyable than the grim and repetitive story elements sprinkled into the later films. Would far prefer the Alien franchise had gone down that pathway rather than what we got from the horrific Alien 3 or even the prequel Prometheus. As it stands, the one movie I do like that feels like it belongs to the Alien/Aliens universe is a film starring Sean Connery called 'Outland.' Same set designer, so it matches the same industrial vibe. Obviously no Xenomorphs, but it tells a story that looks like it could have happened in that same universe.
Poor Jonesy. Imagine being a cat from Ripley's traumatic past, thrown 57 years forword into a whole new feline world. Unable to identify with other cats. Poor Jonesey :(
Ripley is such a good leader. when Hudson starts freaking out she gives him a simple but important task, enough to get his mind off things, isolate him from the group for a bit so he stops freaking them out and get his head back in the game while feeling important to the group. Excellent game plan and reaction.
That's why she was the second in command in Nostromo.
One of the best Sci-fi Action movies ever made!
It was nominated for 7 Oscars:
Best Actress, Sigourney Weaver
Best Sound Editing, Don Sharpe
Best Sound Mixing, Nicholas De Musserier
Best Visual Effects, Stan Winston, John Richardson, Robert Skotak
Best Film Editing Ray Lovejoy
Best Original Score, James Horner
Best Production Design, Peter Lamont.
It won Best Visual Effects and Sound Editing.
It made $193 million dollars ($714 million dollars today) against an $18 million dollar budget.
Its regarded as one of the best Sci-fi Action movies ever made.
A woman nominated for an Action Sic-Fi role? No one ever thought that could happen. But Sigourney is one of a kind! Best actress ever!
@@reesebn38 The writers specifically wrote the main role to be non gender specific. Why they ended up choosing Sigourney, I don't know, but it turned out to be a genius move.
How many times have you wrote this now?
@@n0tk0sher He/she or me!
@@riveraharper8166 shainewhite. I've seen this message on every Aliens reaction I've watched. I was just wondering if they had it saved and just pasted it in. Lol, it's cool though.
Too bad there were never any more movies in this franchise, but I'm happy knowing that Ripley, Hicks and Newt all had long, full lives after this.
I agree completely. 👍
😢
Oh gawd, the sarcasm! 😂
Alien 3 is actually great. Purely for Charles Dance’ performance. One of the greatest English actors of all time. And resurrection was ok.
We don’t talk about AVP though.
@@group-music Nope. After Aliens nothing exist in this (maybe except the alien skull in Predator 2).
"How did we not think about the ceiling?"
It didn't show up in the blue prints. The group were working on flawed intel, not knowing that the rooms were modular with a gap between the room's ceilings and the actual roof of the complex. Unfortunately the people who could have informed them about that were all used as chestburster incubators.
James Cameron is responsible for 2 of the greatest sequels ever made. But damn, Ripley's life has been a living hell ever since the Nostromo
He also had two of the greatest heroines in filmdom, Ellen Ripley, and Sarah Connor. Dude has been pretty much money with nearly every movie.
Avatar 2 did pretty well.
@@JonCombopretty well is an understatement. Its literally the highest grossing movie with the second one in 3rd place
The Xenomorph Queen is probably one of the best creature animatronics designed for films.
Edit: it’s actually a puppet.
100% agree. Considering it's fully practical. Our brain knows it. That's why it looks so good 37 years later.
I'm not so sure about that.
What I saw of it in the making of doc looked as much like puppetry as animatronics.
That's not to say that the puppetry wasn't great if that is a closer approximation of the technique used.
It's not animatronic. It was a puppeted. There's a great documentary about the making of this film, and they discuss the creation of this "puppet" creature.
@@aaronsynra6867 Depends on what model...
There were 4. 1 Large full puppet. 1 Large 1/2 stationary with animatronics. 1 Small puppet. 1 Small figurine.
The documentary on the special Edition only shows the large full puppet as it was the most impressive. There are third party documentaries (i think Adam Savage did one) where you see parts of the others and it's fully discussed.
I mean Aliens and Jurassic Park is in a class of their own when it comes to practical effects. But, JP is a lot better when it comes to actual animatronics, Alien/s just did minimal footage and dark lighting to make it look good. The design of the Xenomorph is unmatched though
The first one is a horror movie. This one is more of a pure action movie. Which one people like more usually (but not always) depends on their genre preference.
gabus man say, action better.
A lesser director tasked with making a sequel to an all-time classic would have just recycled the original. James Cameron took a risk by making it an action movie with totally new characters and upping the ante by adding more aliens and the queen.
This film actually goes from being an action movie halfway to a survival movie once they get stranded on the planet and the rest of the film is them trying to survive and escape.
Predator did the same thing
the first half of the films are textbook actions films, while the second half devolves quickly into survival-horror
When James Cameron did something a little different with the Alien franchise, everyone loved it.
When Jean-Pierre Jeunet did something a little different with the Alien franchise, everyone hated it. Except me. 😄
Alien: Horror
Aliens: Action
Alien... I don't know how I'm supposed to pronounce a title with superscript in it's name -- like is it Alien cubed? Alien to the third power? Alien (small high pitched voice) *three*... so I already feel hopeless and depressed:
Nihilist Porn
I LOVE the mother vs. mother aspect of the storyline. It shows both are all in. Also Ripley an adoptive daughter right after she found out her biological daughter passed away. ❤
Alien: Isolation Isa game that kind of fills in part of Ripleys daughters' life. She tries to find out what happened to her mom.
@@rwxstudio7173 😲 😲 😲
The extended cut is much, *much* better than the theatrical release (which is still amazing).
The reasons why are:
1) More character development for Ripley, which adds more meaning to her deep connection with Newt.
2) Extra scenes at the colony, which show how thriving it was before it gets overrun. That makes the scene where the marines find Hadley's Hope completely deserted much more sinister.
3) Scenes with the colonists finding the alien ship, which shows it broken up by seismic activity on the planet.
4) The sentry gun turret scenes. Apart from just being incredibly cool, the sentry turrets explain why the aliens don't try to bust their way through the barricades just like they did with the colonists. After failing to get past the turrets, the aliens shut off power to the medlab and then come in through the ceiling, which shows how smart and adaptable they are.
I second this comment, the Directors cut is by far superior.
Yea, the extended version gives you a little more background, though not much. The biggest difference were the automatic cannons they used first on the planet. I really liked those :-)
I largely agree. I could do without the colonists finding the ship, though. I find that it kneecaps some of the mystery when the marines start to investigate Hadley's Hope. Which I'll admit doesn't really make sense. I mean - we all know what's going on. Kinda. But it just feels to me like its more interesting touching down not having seen anything about the colonists at this point.
It's a fair point about showing a thriving colony. It does make the empty spaces feel like they should be feeling less utilitarian and more lived in. Maybe if the edit showed the colony and stopped at the discovery scene. Dunno. YMMV.
A director's cut without the colonists finding the ship would be perfect.
@@arandomnamegoeshere Yeah, I get your point about the colonists finding the ship and the dad getting facehugged. It does undercut the suspense way too early.
The only thing is, it's really cool to see the alien ship partly broken open, and there wouldn't be any reason to show it in the movie otherwise.
One thing that the studios seem to have overlooked, is that the alien ship is *still* there on LV-426. There's no mention of the colonists blowing it up, and the ship is at least 100 miles away from the colony site (because it took the salvage team a week to get there).. so it wasn't destroyed when the reactor blows up.
They could have used the alien ship as a source of eggs for the sequel, instead of the ridiculous plot hole egg that starts Alien 3.
At least the magic egg makes Alien 3 and all the dross that came after it non-canon.
Fun fact: Jennette Goldstein (Vasquez) is a good friend of James Cameron. It's hard to believe she was the same woman to play the irish mother in the movie "Titanic". She's also in at least one more James Cameron film, but based on the comments, I'm assuming you haven't seen it yet, so...no spoilers.
and the foster mother of John Conner in Terminator 2
@@TowaFX Yeah I know that, I was trying not to spoil it. READ MY COMMENT. DUH!!
@@ChrisReise Pride was too heavy for this guy. Typical narcissist behavior about "See? ME I KNOW".
She is a chameleon of an actor damn
The line in the movie when Hudson says "She heard Aliens and thought it meant Illegal Aliens and signed up" is an inside joke with the Cast about Jennette. When the casting came out she thought the Movie was about Illegal Aliens and showed up dressed like a Migrant for the Casting call......
Totally watch the extended version. It fills in some things this left out and it makes more sense in the end.
The only issue with the extended version is that they show the colony prior. But if you've seen the film before then it's not such a big deal.
@@nutyyyy it also shows that she was a mom before she came to the planet. She lost her daughter and gains one with Nute
@staciepoole8161 the picture they show Ripley of her daughter when she passed away was of her (Sigourney Weaver's) mom to add the emotional touch.
@@nutyyyy That's not an "issue" in the real world. It's only an "issue" in your mind.
Paul Reiser, the actor who played Burke, said in an interview that his own mother cheered at the premier when his character died.
Extended cut added much more meaning to the relationship of Ripley and Newt in the first few minutes of the film. Mind boggling that the studio cut it out.
It was because of those scenes getting cut is why Weaver almost didn't do Alien 3. She only relented when given executive producer credit as well as implementing her personal views on firearms ie she's anti-gun big time.
The studio didn't cut the scenes, Cameron wasn't the king of the world then and he was obliged to deliver a movie that didn't exceed a certain length. He got his director's cut released a few years later on home video - one of the first directors to make a habit of finishing a longer version for the future, starting with "Aliens." However Cameron saw to it that his extra scenes were finished and/or preserved he deserves a lot of credit for predicting the future.
From the point of view of the studio, there was no reason to believe that "Aliens" would work anything like as well as it did. "Alien" was seven years before and Cameron had only done "Terminator" and "Piranha II" by this point.
No, I still prefer the original version. The surprise of shooting at a child was way more horrifying. Even the deceased daughter stuff is not really needed for a woman to protect and bond with a child.
@@ardvan OP said the scene shouldn't have been cut... and you say "no" because of a completly different scene?
@@Painocus I prefer the cut version. By showing less it enhances the suspense because you have no clue what happened.
Seeing this in '86 was the first time I'd experienced an audience cheering during a film. There were a number of moments that got a reaction but the two I remember are Hicks diving through the med-lab window and the reveal of Ripley in the loader.
Ripley is one of my favourite characters/heros in all movie history, she is up there with James Bond and Indiana Jones. Just a shame the character/story suffered after Aliens, but I have trouble deciding which of the two I like best as they are both excellent in their own way.
Stella, in the original film, the byline was "In space, no one can hear you scream". That movie was far more about the ominous atmosphere, and the suspense. That's why you hardly saw the alien in the first movie. They were going for more of an emotional reaction from audience in the first one. Whereas in this movie, it was more about the thrills, and the action; something James Cameron is known more than Ridley Scott who directed the first film.
The tagline for Aliens was “This time, it’s war.”
The first film is a horror film
the second film is an action film for the first alf, then devolves into a survival horror for the last half.
Although you see a lot of the queen in aliens, you see even less of the warrior aliens in Cameron's film than you do in the first film. You see that there are multiple aliens, but they're always shrouded in shadows and darkness. In the last third of Alien, you see a lot of the creature, especially right at the end when Ripley blasts it with the ship exhaust.
@@Aquascape_Dreamingthat was because they only had five actors in the warrior suits so they had to digitally replicate them. It’s much easier to do have them in shadow.
The extended version was awesome. It wasn't much longer but it was all worth while. Especially the action tunnel scene with the remote guns
I still prefer the theatrical version. I especially don't like the scene where Newt and her family go out to the derelict ship. It shows the facehugger too soon and it also makes it less surprising to find Newt later on.
@@nodak81 Same.
In my opinion they didn't just cut that scene for time - they cut it so that it was less obvious that Aliens is actually more of a remake than a sequel.
When you put that scene back in suddenly the cadence of plot elements looks a lot more like the first film.
@@nodak81 funny. acceptable point but i don't feel it. it's totally clear that they are going find aliens when they arrive later (and the we-lost-contact-scene is right after that scene), so no surprise to be spoiled (to me it rather builds up tension on what /exactly/ they are going to find). and it's also not clear that it is necessarily Newt to be found later on, could have just be a random family.
also Newt's scream in that cut scene is one of the best in whole cinema history.
For me, the missing scenes are the ones where Ripley and Burke discuss her daughter. It informs Ripley's reaction to Newt.
I like portions of both versions. My ultimate version would use scenes from both but especially delete the early family discovery, while leaving in that they went to check it out. So we'd see the colonists and know newts family went out there but we wouldn't see the family attacked.
One of my favorite movies of all time. Mom took my sister and I see this at the theater when I was 10 or 11. Was such a long adrenaline ride, my hands started shaking in the car on the way home. The very definition of an "edge of your seat" film. It was awesome.
The double standard of “by now they’re already being cocooned” and “no! She’s alive! There’s still time!” Is kind of wild.
By the end, it's pretty clear Ripley was irrational and would have done anything to save Newt, or kill herself trying. She had no personal investment in the soldiers.
I imagine the xenomorph calmly standing in the elevator listening to an instrumental version of "Girl From Ipanema".
I like how these two directors made two different films but were able to keep the lore and canon of the franchise. While two different directors made the previous Star Wars trilogy and completely undermind each other.
So true, the massive worldbuilding of the first movie really benefits this one, while this one also respects and builds upon the worldbuilding and plot of the first one.
My biggest problem with the newest Star Wars was in EpVIII it felt like they were actively trying to delete certain threads of plot points and characters, and EpIX seemed like it was just trying to salvage what was left of a coherent story from the end of VIII, like they got written into a corner.
These two movies along with the first two Terminator movies is definitely an example of how to do sequels right.
Okay let’s be fair this analogy sucks
Making the sequel to a film is not the same as making a literal squeal trilogy to an existing trilogy.
and to be even more fair, as much as i dislike the sequel trilogy
Freaking Lucas destroyed his own lore and cannon with the prequels and Medioclorians destroying everything about the force
turning the Jedi from warrior monks who kept peace to literal video game superheroes who were almost invulnerable (until plot needed them not to be) and could wipe out entire armies single handed.
@@mckenzie.latham91 Personally I've never found Midichlorians to have ruined the lore.
It was assumed from the end of Return of the Jedi that force sensitivity was apparently inheritable when Luke says the force is strong in his family, Midichlorians just add a layer of mild science to that idea that a Jedi's force abilities are a mixture of genetic sensitivity and Jedi training honing that natural gift.
But yes making them hold their own in combat against hundreds may have been good for spectacle but it did admittedly ruin the mystery a bit.
However the new sequels didn't even get basic character consistency right, they immediately made characters irrelevant or killed them off in episode VIII and cut off different themes in favour of focusing on a slow chase, and then episode IX has hundreds of ships helping them even though they had no backup answer them in VIII, the plot was all over the place.
It's so funny how people are talking about the world-building and lore of Ridley Scott's Alien. Guys, it's one of the most perfect films ever made, but it's a b-movie script treated with a-movie sensibilities. It's a b-movie with big money, good actors and a good director riding on the tailcoats of other recent sci-fi movies. It's simple, straightforward and trying to scare you. Not build a world.
And if the lore is what gave us Prometheus, i don't need it. 😄
@@G1NZOU "Personally I've never found Midichlorians to have ruined the lore.”
Good for you but you are wrong, it as literally been proven to totally retcon everything in Empire
The force goes from a living energy field that exist sin all things, that the Jedi were just trained to tap into
to literal organisms that have to exist in humanoid bodies, and how many of these organisms exist in you controls how powerful you are in the force
Which is essentially Dragon Ball Z Power levels
“Even master Yoda doesn’t have a medichlorian count of over 20 thousand” etc.
It’s ridiculous, ruins the mysticism and everything meaningful about the force and totally ignores the message.
At that point Star war was ruined
the only ting that saved the Prequels in terms of relevance to the overall franchise, was the expanded universe and the numerous cartoons and stories centered around it, to actually make it make sense, give it purpose and literally flush out what Lucas couldn’t get right or be betted to care about, in the films.
That's the only saving grace.
"It was assumed from the end of Return of the Jedi that force sensitivity was apparently inheritable when Luke says the force is strong in his family,”
The force exists in everything and everyone, but like any traits, those who are strong in the force pass that on
that has nothing to do with medchlorians
And in the original trilogy you could be strong in the force and not be a Jedi
When Vader is chasing Luke in the death star trench he says, “the force is strong with this one”
he had no idea it was a Jedi or Luke/his son, which was the hint that you don't need to be a jedi to be in the force or have the force
That was changed after Lucas made the prequels and basically regulated everyone who has force abilities or force sensitive is somehow only that way because they have power levels.
Star wars was killed long before Disney had control
Cause Lucas forgot his roots, threw away the idea of collective filmmaking and was so obsessed with what shinny sterile toys he could make and do with his green/blue screens and computers,
that he forgot the key to actual good film making is real substance, good or at least focussed writing, and knowing when to stop adding on to your already established and perfect work to try and appear edgy and profound.
Funnily enough the exact same lessons the people who did the sequel trilogy failed to learn as well.
The most iconic line of this movie and perhaps one of the most of all sci-fi was omitted in this reaction. "Game over man. Game over."
She can drive a loader because she learned working at the warehouse that they mentioned before. She didn't just wake up and go back, she tried to reintergrate into society before being called back, finding a job.
The woman that plays Vasquez is also John Connors foster mother in Terminator 2.
So the extended version has a scene at the beginning where Ripley is told her RL daughter died of cancer. This was an important detail to give better insight on why Ripley bonded so much with Newt and was incredibly protective of her. It also made sense why she understand Newt's capacity since her RL daughter was Newt's age in the first Alien movie.
Also: the picture they use for Ripley’s daughter(Amanda in-film), who was an older woman by the time Ripley was found, was played by Sigourney Weaver’s real life mother, Elizabeth Ingrid.
Also, in a deleted scene, as Ripley is trying to find Newt in the nest, she finds Burke cocooned and already impregnated with an Alien embryo, Burke begs Ripley to kill him… she looks him dead in the face, then ignores his cries and just leaves him, and goes on to find Newt lol… that’s should have made the extended❤❤❤
@@NestorCaster ooooo I didn't know about that! That's amazing, thanks for the info!
@@NestorCaster Karma comes in the form of a xenomorph lol!
also explains why Ripley wiped out the eggs in the nest in front of the queen instead of just booking it back to the ship and watching the nuclear fireball: payback
Vasquez is the Foster mom of Johnn Connor in Terminator 2 Judgement Day, took me a few viewings of both this movie and T2 to realize that lol
Wow, from kickass babe to harassed mom. Shows her acting range.
Vazquez also played in Titanic,she was the mom with the two children in bed.
She's also one of the cops in Lethal Weapon 2 and one of the vampire gang in Near Dark (which also has Bill Paxton and Lance Henrikksen from Aliens).
And let's not forget this movie was made before any real CGI, mostly using very complex puppeteering and using miniatures, but despite all of that, this movie, brought out in 1986, made in 1985, is now 38 years old, but aged pretty well. Even after all these years, this movie is still so well done.
It was also made for something like $18 million.
46:25to expand on the "mother" theme. This was a great scene where the mother of the aliens stares down Ripley who is Newt's surrogate mother. They don't say anything to each other but they both have that "you hurt mine, I hurt yours" vibe
and then an egg opens and ripley goes " so you wanna play that way ?" and the alienqueen might have realised the mistake
“Why are you going to bring an advisor if you’re not going to listen to them?”
THANK YOU🤷🏻♂️
58:08 "I dont know if your arms are stronger than the vacuum of space" .. To give some physics answer here: its actually the other way around. Vacuum actually doesnt have any "force" (even when it seems like). Its actually the airpressure, which "goes" into space. That air pressure is 13 pounds per square inch. The wind speeds when that hatch opens are from the air molecules itself (which at room temperature moves around the speed of sound (thats actually also the reason for the speed of sound in the air) - meaning: the windspeed = speed of sound, when the hatch to the vacuum of space opens. And the force, as i said is 13 pounds per square inch of Ripley.. because her body is right laying in the direction of the windspeed - meaning thats around 100 square-inch of surface against the air.. 100 times 13 pounds would be 1300 pounds she has to hold with her arms.
So in conclusion: you are right... realisticly spoken, she would not be able to hold herself in that situation - not even for a second. And thats only if she would hold herself only. But the Alien queen is also holding on her.
But 1300 pounds on one arm exceeds by far even the strongest men on earth.
It would be at least enough to dislocate the shoulder... probably even rip the arm off.
So... very good observation about that movie-mistake.
Also - because the air would go out into space with the speed of sound, this also means : from that big door - the air from that spaceship - regardless how big it is, would be out in no time. And that would mean Ripley, Newt and Hicks would be unconscious in 15-20 seconds tops (and thats only if they were smart and exhale as much as possible, BEFORE the vacuum comes). If they hold their breath, the airpressure in their lungs would literally rip their ripcage apart, when the vacuum comes, and they would die from it immediately.
So the only very slim chance to survive for 15-20 seconds spacevacuum is: to exhale as much as possible, before the vacuum comes.
I was living in LA in the late 80s. I met Michael(Hicks)Biehn twice. A super nice guy! The first time was in a Hotel Lobby in San Francisco. Aliens was about to come out and I couldn't wait, because I was a Sci-Fi nerd and loved The Terminator and Alien. I walked up to him, he was surrounded by girls asking for autographs, I shoved my way through them and shook his hand. I said "I think you're a brilliant actor". He said "Thanks". He asked my name. I replied. Then walked away and left him to the girls. A year later I was in a bar in Hollywood and saw Michael standing at the bar and having a beer. So I walked up to him again and said I met him before. He said he remembered but forgot my name. He didn't remember he was just being nice. We then had a long conversation about acting and sports over a couple of beers. Should have been a bigger star. He's great at playing the best good guy like Hicks or Kyle Reese in "The Terminator". He is great a playing the best bad guy like Lt.Coffey in "The Abyss" or Jonny Ringo in "Tombstone". Few actors pull that off.
A brilliant psycho mad serial killer in another movie
I often see comments about Bill Paxton being the only actor killed by an Alien, a Predator and a Terminator (btw Lance Henriksen too), but Michael Biehn is the one in love with Sarah Connor and Ellen Ripley, the most iconic female action heroes....
The Abyss was Cameron's most underrated work.
@@JFrazer4303 The Fan?
Michael Biehn is a fantastic actor , all of his movies are so good .
He's a convincing , likeable , realistic guy the movies he plays in .
He should have gotten more credit and recognition as the great actor he really is .
Sounds like a super nice guy in real life too !
I'm so stoked that you two are continuing on with the franchise! I absolutely love all these movies. They all have different vibes but are worth watching.
How the queen got inboard the dropship is still a question untill this day 😂
I usually don't watch reaction videos this long, but it's so entertaining watching your genuine reactions and great comments afterwards. Keep up the good work!
16:40 In the Director's Cut there's extra scenes that show how Burke took the information from Ripley's hearing, and instructed colonists to go out to the alien ship, but without telling them what would be out there.
Right from the start, Burke was after bringing an alien back.
The sub-plot of Ripley and Newt is awesome. Ripley out-lived her daughter and Newt lost her mother, so they fulfilled a missing part of each of their lives. I love that part of the story. Newt calling Ripley "Mommy" at the end was just a great way to end their story in the film. Great film. The extended cut has scenes showing Newt with her family interacting with a face hugger, which I'm glad it's not in the theatrical cut as you learn about Newt a little bit at a time.
6:44 - Looks like you're watching the theatrical cut. The Director's Cut adds in a lot of footage left out of the original, including a scene here where we get to see the colony thriving before the inevitable happens. We also learn about Ripley's daughter, who lived to old age and died 3 years before Ripley was found. (Incidentally, Ripley's daughter is the protagonist of the 2014 video game Alien: Isolation.)
12:30 - You may have missed this, but actually several weeks/months have passed since she woke up. Like Burke said, she's been working as a cargo loader in the space docks since then. Even if she hadn't been familiar with this equipment before, she's had time to learn.
18:51 - Would YOU be after the s#$% she's seen?
23:03 - This is what Xenomorphs do when they reach sufficient numbers to form a colony. First they secrete the same resinous material that makes up their exoskeletons and use it to turn their current location into a Hive. This resinous shell not only helps turn the climate into one more suited to their metabolism, but it acts as highly effective camouflage because it is the same material as their exoskeletons sculpted into shapes that mimic their own lines.
26:21 - This is what we in the 40K fandom call 'Exterminatus.'
27:16 - So I'm going to mention this here. One of the things you miss out on not seeing the Director's Cut is the development of the relationship between Hicks and Ripley that starts here. You get bits of it, but not enough to see where it's supposed to be going.
32:00 - As I mentioned earlier, the Director's Cut shows the colony receiving that message and going out to investigate.
39:59 - GAME OVER, MAN! GAME OVER!!
44:13 - This scene is slightly extended in the Director's Cut and serves as the wrap-up for the development of Ripley and Hick's relationship. The highlight of the scene is finally learning Ripley's first name: Ellen.
Aliens established the core of the Xenomorph lore. Although the later Promethius movies would attempt to expand the background, most of the lore development from here on took place in comics, video games, and other forms of media. Probably the biggest thing to happen to expand the lore of the xenomorphs actually happened in a different movie franchise from the same era.
The original movie series has two more films: Alien 3 and Alien: Resurrection. A prequel duology exists: Prometheus and Alien: Covenant. They're...different. You can take them or leave them. What you DO need to watch are the Predator movies: Predator 1 and 2. I know the guys watched 1, you should try to get in on 2 when they watch it. After that there's the Alien Vs. Predator series.
This was actually pretty groundbreaking when it came out 37 years ago.
and of course now every reactor just compares everything to a Marvel movie
@JohnnyXoz which are generally worse imo
Exactly. It provided the archetype so many movies copy.
She knew how to run the loader because that is what she was doing once awakened to fill her days.
Is it just me, or is Stella just an absolute angel?
There's a book that explains why she was lost for 57 years. The director's cut is better as it has more background on Ripley and Newt's family. I always thought these marines were specially picked by the "Company" because they were f-ups and not the top of the line..which suited the company's agenda. There is a cut scene that shows Ripley coming across a cocooned Burke.
The casting of Paul Reiser in Stranger Things season 2 was one of the clever things about it, particularly since the entire season (or at least the parts taking place at the research facility) had a very Aliens vibe to it (it even threw in the "Stray frosty," line when the soldiers were exploring the gateway). Everyone who had seen Aliens was just waiting for him to turn out to be a rat who was going to screw everyone over to save his own skin. Then we were shocked to find he actually had a heart. In fact, he was about the only one who had a heart in that entire installation. Hah.
Oh, and as for her being able to drive the loader 57 years later? That's because that's her job, now. That's what Burke was talking to her about when he said he saw she'd gotten a new job (I think that's great!). A lot of time passes between when she has that meeting with the company and when contact is lost with the colony, which unfortunately isn't conveyed as well in the theatrical release as it is in the extended version.
Masterpiece ever. The best sequel ever.
This was Carrie Henns (Newt) only major acting role. After this movie her parents moved back to the United States from London and she basically gave up acting. After high school she pursued a career in education and is currently teaching grade four in the California school system. Her and Sigourney Weaver remained friends and maintain contact with each other to this day. 😊
17:59 In the extended version, the girl's family, alongside her brother, ends up finding the torus-looking ship from the first film, and her father gets caught by a facehugger. The rest is history.
I completely forgot that scene isn't in the theatrical version for some reason
Hey, Stella and Haley! This is one of the best sequels ever made!
Unfortunately, you didn't see the superior SPECIAL EDITION which has the Amanda Ripley scene, the functioning colony scene, Newt's family's discovery of the derelict ship scene, the automated gun scene, the Hudson speculation about queen ants scene and the name exchange scene. The SPECIAL EDITION is the version both James Cameron and Sigourney Weaver prefer.
The future Ripley inhabits is implied to be a dystopic corporatocracy. The most pervasive and powerful corporate entity is the Weyland-Yutani Company, a 22nd-century version of the British East India Company of the 17th- to 19th-centuries. It is a multinational conglomerate involved in robotics, interstellar transport and terraforming with a stake in every colony world. The Company is the TRUE VILLAIN of the Alien universe. Ash and Burke were following a secret corporate mandate to obtain a xenomorph specimen in order to profit from research and weaponization.
The colonists who venture beyond the compound like Newt's parents are prospectors who can lay a claim to any discovery they make. The Company would get a large percentage of the find but the colonist would own a piece. A valuable ore would mean a fortune! After Burke heard Ripley's story, he contacted the colony boss to dispatch someone to the coordinates Ripley had indicated in her report with no warning of danger. He must have done a little digging and found out about the Company Directive to investigate any possible sign of intelligent life and to bring back a specimen. He sent Newt's family straight to the derelict ship.
Neither Hicks nor Apone were treating Ripley in a sexist manner when she offered to help prep. They regarded her as a civilian. They were both accustomed to females in their unit such as medic Dietrich, pilot Ferro and heavy-gunner Vasquez. When she demonstrates her proficiency with the loader, they were laughing good-naturedly at her bravado and their own underestimation of her abilities.
Some trivia:
The picture of Ripley's elderly daughter in the Special Edition is actually Sigourney Weaver's real-life mother!
The late Al Matthews, who played Sgt. Apone, was a true-blue Marine who was the first black man to be promoted to Sergeant in the Corps during his service in Vietnam!
The knife-trick scene was originally supposed to be performed by Lance Henriksen alone but he convinced director James Cameron to surprise Bill Paxton by involving him as they shot the scene! Paxton's wide-eyed terror is completely real!
Fan favorite Vasquez is played by non-Hispanic Jenette Goldstein! She goes out like a warrior and enables Gorman to reclaim his honor.
Ms. Goldstein now is the proprietress of a Los Angeles-based boutique that specializes in bespoke large-size bras! The motto of her company is, "At Jenette's, the alphabet begins with 'D'."!
Bishop's programming to not harm humans or allow them to come to harm through inaction is ripped straight from Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics!
Carrie Henn, who played Newt, never acted again but became a schoolteacher. She still maintains a correspondence relationship with Sigourney Weaver thirty-six years later.
The late Bill Paxton, who has the distinction of being attacked on screen by an Alien, a Terminator and a Predator, will NEVER be forgotten for his reading of the line, "Why don't you put HER in charge?", referring to little Newt in her oversized helmet. Lol.
"ALIEN 3: ASSEMBLY CUT" is a DIVISIVE film but it's an EXCELLENT entry in the series. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND YOU SEE IT!!! Many will try to dissuade you but it is ESSENTIAL VIEWING! It's directed by David Fincher and features Charles Dance and Charles Dutton. It's brutal, fast-paced, has a solid cast, has some extraordinary scares, provides new insight into the creature, presents a fascinating dilemma and concludes the trilogy elegantly. I strongly encourage you NOT TO SKIP IT! Make sure you see the ASSEMBLY CUT (Special Edition with longer runtime). It is available on Redbox and right here on YT. "Alien Resurrection" is the optional one because it's a hot mess except for one cool aquatic sequence. The ambitious prequels, "Prometheus" and "Covenant", mark director Ridley Scott's return to the series but they are mostly good JUST for Michael Fassbender's performances. Scott demystifies the creature and unsatisfyingly attempts to address who the elephant-headed pilot of the derelict spacecraft was.
If you intend to see the "ALIEN vs. PREDATOR" films, then you need to acquaint yourself with the PREDATOR franchise. The first is an action classic with Schwarzenegger. Danny Glover's underrated urban-set "PREDATOR 2" features some memorable set pieces. Dark Horse comics explored the crossover concept inspiring Hollywood to make two crossover films with moderately successful to excellent results. They're fun and exciting guilty pleasures with the second one, "ALIENS vs. PREDATOR: REQUIEM", being particularly lean and mean. There is also a "PREDATORS" film produced by Robert Rodriguez that is definitely worth a look. "THE PREDATOR" (2018) REBOOT, however, nearly killed the franchise and should be approached with a great deal of trepidation! "PREY" is an 18th-century-set prequel to the original film that was released on Hulu last summer! The Alien films have a RICHER SUBTEXT while the Predator films are more ACTION FARE but they're both fun sci-fi thrillers.
VIEWING ORDER:
Alien
Aliens (Special Edition)
Alien 3 (Assembly Cut)
Alien Resurrection (Director's Cut) [OPTIONAL]
Predator (1987)
Predator 2
Predators
Prey
Alien vs. Predator
Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (Unrated)
Prometheus [OPTIONAL]
Covenant [OPTIONAL]
The Predator (2018) [EXTREMELY OPTIONAL]
INTERNAL CHRONOLOGY:
1719 Prey
1987 Predator
1997 Predator 2
2004 Alien vs. Predator
2004 Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (Unrated)
2010 Predators
2018 The Predator [EXTREMELY OPTIONAL]
2093 Prometheus [OPTIONAL]
2104 Covenant [OPTIONAL]
2122 Alien
2179 Aliens (Special Edition)
2179 Alien 3 (Assembly Cut)
2379 Alien Resurrection (Director's Cut) [OPTIONAL]
I would have preferred the extended version, it has some scenes that add a lot more context to it, especially the relation between Ripley and Newt. Ellen Ripley had a daughter when she left earth, roughly the same age as Newt. After she was found after 57 years, she learned that her daughter died before she was found. So saving Newt has a much deeper meaning for Ripley to what is shown in this version. And hits much harder when Newt calls her "Mommy" at the end. Also a lot of scenes how the settlers found that alien ship you know from the first Alien movie. It was Newts dad who was the first victim of a facehugger. Besides that, a few more fight scenes which are quite intense. IMHO worth considering making a second reaction video with the extended.
The special edition is the version Cameron originally wrote and intended for the audience to see, and the favorite for most fans. Some freaks prefer the theatrical for some twisted "reasons."
FYI, the late, great Bill Paxton's in another great horror/suspense thriller with Matthew McConaughey called "Frailty" (2001). It also stars Powers Boothe (of Sin City). You two would truly enjoy that film; great story.
the guy who played Hicks also played Kyle Reese in Terminator
The fun fact the scene in Cantine after the Marines and Ripley wake up was the last scene they made, the actors had known each other for months now so that's why is so like family banters, jokes, and laughs.
I loved the part where the Marine was saying how they were all toast and Ripley says, "This little girl survived here for weeks with no weapons and no training."
But see, I also think that had another meaning, much more sinister: I believed that the only reason Newt was left alone, was because, the Queen and the colony had taken every one else-- they didn’t need her… and when Ripley and the Marines came, it might have been the only thing that kept her from eventually being taken by them… as new eggs were hatched and new Xenomorphs were born.
There is some time that passes between Ripley getting picked up and her being convinced to go back. During which she had her flight rank and license stripped. That's where she learned to pilot the power loader, working in a dockyard.
When you're in the military you have to believe you're invincible.
Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for I am that evil.
God I got so distracted through this, Stella looked gorgeous!
But this film series is one of my faves and this sequel rocks.
Nice video girls!
What I love about the final fight is that the loader is not intended as a weapon. It's strong, sure, but it's slow and has little protection. That improvisational aspect (reinforced by her use of the blowtorch) really displays Ripley's resourcefulness and makes that scene. Wonderful.
You both wondered how Ripley knew how to use the Power Loader. The company man mentions when he comes to her for help that she's been working down at the docks. That where she got her license.
I think the debate between the 2 films has always been a little muted as they are different genres; psych-horror and action-horror. Each one is a superb example of their respective genres.
Meh, I don't even think of Aliens as horror at all.
You can't really call it horror when the beast so mysterious and deadly from the first film is killed multiple times within the movie - that's why they had to up the ante with the Alien queen, and even then it didn't really work for me.
Aliens reduces the mystery beast into a merely dangerous animal requiring just enough firepower to take down - in this way I would credit Cameron as the beginning of the demystifying of the xenomorph, and not in any kind of positive way.
@@mnomadvfx Mysterious and inexplicable things do inspire horror, but so do implacable, inhuman and powerful things. The girls even say it in their reaction, something to the effect that the group left after the disastrous hive attack are clever, careful and competent...and still outmatched. That is it's own brand of horror.
Every strong female lead in sci-fi in the last 30 years owes its gemesis to Sigourney Weaver’s portraysl of “Ripley” in the first 2 Alien movies…
And she owes it to Jennifer Lawrence.
Wait, Jennifer Lawrence said she was the first female action hero in any movie. How, then, can Ripley be such a kick ass, well written, character driven hero (not to mention, amazingly, plays a maternal influence as well) exist before Jennifer Lawrence? Anyway, yes this movie, Godfather II, Terminator 2, Empire Strikes Back.....doesn't get better.
Makes no sense.
Al Pacino was the lead in Godfather 2. There was no female lead.
Arnold Schwarzenegger was the lead in Terminator 2. I guess you could argue Linda Hamilton was.
And Mark Hamil and Harrison Ford were the leads in The Empire Strikes Back.
Carrie Fisher didn’t even want to come back for the sequels….
@@hannahstevenson27 Well, to clarify, because it seems you need some here evidently. There are two issues being pointed out here: 1. Lawrence's ridiculous and ignorant interview where she stated she, unbelievably, stated she was the first female action hero in a movie. I was pointing out how Weaver played an ICONIC FEMALE action hero 30 YEARS prior. Number 2: just listing a number of usual suspects in cases where the sequel is, arguably, better than the original. In addition, to add fuel to your fire, Hamilton is ABSOLUTELY written and has a logical, well developed, character arc which makes her another classic movie hero. My point was Hollywood can't do this kind of thing today, regardless how much Jennifer Lawrence refuses to acknowledge it was actually done SUCCESSFULLY before she was even born
@@louisenglish8069 I read somewhere that Jennifer Lawrence was actually referring to the YA genre, which Hunger Games is, and not movies in general. So yes, she probably IS the first real kick-ass female lead in a YA-based movie.
Not to be forgotten among those great sequels - 'Star Trek 2 : The Wrath of Khan'. What a freaking masterpiece of a movie. I've seen it at least 100 times and that final act still guts me every time (you know which scene).
@@DavidGowers Easy to take things out of context. People should watch the complete segment of the interview.
19:47 "Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen!" is a more gentle version of "Drop your cocks and grab your socks!" as Bill Paxton couldn't say that phrase in front of Newt (Carrie Henn). In every scene where he had to swear, once they cut, he would apologize profusely to Carrie for swearing in front of her. Bill and Keanu are the few class acts left in Hollywood. RIP.
The SFX with Bishop when his upper body is still "alive" is amazing.
Queen takes Bishop.
There was a difference in vision between the first Alien directed by Ridley Scott and Aliens directed by James Cameron. This was the first time an actress was nominated for Best Actress for playing a character in a movie sequel as well....
Throughly enjoyed watching a younger generation of women discovering the Aliens series, specifically Ripley. She was my generations first woman movie hero. Her character really displays how to be courageous and bold, even when facing a monster.
Here’s some trivia for you… the actor playing the colony administrator in this plays Captain Hollister in Red Dwarf (Mac McDonald)
He was also a cop at McDonald's in the Fifth Element.
The late composer James Horner wrote this score in a little over a week since they weren’t done filming/editing. His score garnered an Oscar Nomination.
Good reaction as always girls. You should see the director's cut it explians why Ripley got so attached to Newt so quickly and a few other things as well. The actor of Kyle Reese from the first Terminator movie is here as the one that survives with Ripley and Newt,which is cool and Lopaz is the actress of John's adopted mother in Terminator 2. The parts where Lopaz is shooting the aliens is not the actress but in fact it was James's wife at the time as a stand in for her. These two are the best and honostly I think you could just end things here and not watch the ones that came next. The actors got to design their own armor so each of them have something personal on it which is an interesting idea. If you have both not seen Terminator 1 and 2 then I highly suggest you do so because they are both amazing movies. I loved this one so much though it takes more of an action side than horror but still interesting and by the way the part where they have Bishop play the knife game with Bill Paxton's character the fear on his face was real because he had no idea they would use his own hand for it also if you pay close attention you will see that the footage was sped up so that it looks like bishop is doing so with unhuman speed which is an interesting way to do things.
Vasquez not Lopaz.
"You should see the director's cut it explians why Ripley got so attached to Newt so quickly and a few other things as well"
Yesn't.
The Ripley of the first movie went back for a cat.
A frickin cat - and she tried to go back for her last 2 crew knowing that they were under attack, only to find them dead.
She was already demonstrated to be a good person by these actions in Alien.
If anything setting a requirement on her goodness from Newt being an emotional replacement for her daughter makes Ripley LESS of a good person.
Also the latino Marine woman with the gimballed smart gun is called Vasquez, not Lopaz.
I would agree about not watching Alien Resurreciton, but Alien 3 is fine as long as it is the Assembly Cut - unlike Aliens it actually has an original plot 😅
@@stevenjohansen3827 sorry got confused with a different movie arg. She is a cool character though.
@@mnomadvfx You were probably not paying attention, but in the first movie there was only one alien, and Ripley had a working flamethrower. On this one, there are hundreds of aliens and Ripley has limited ammo.
Also, on the first one Ripley was just reacting, not having time to process everything. On this one, she's clearly traumatized. She had the time to relive her nightmares again and again. So going into the aliens' nest to rescue Newt is a big deal. It's not just because she's a "good person."
This movie was so excellent as a sequel building on what the original set up and advancing Ripley's character.
Love Newt ❤
I believe Ripley had a Class 2 Loader Rating NOW rather than 57 years ago. There would be no need for a Warrent Officer in her Nostromo position to have one OR she would have similar knowledge/rating of other equipment to update her rating 57 years after. ❤your Horror Reactions!!!!
A fact I will forever love about this movie is how James Cameron pitched it.
He met the execs, wrote ALIEN in caps, added an S at the end, then turned the S into a $.
The pitch took less than 30 seconds.
53:00 "The upper body strength of this woman." and "I don't know if your arms are stronger than the vacuum of space."
I'll tell you the science so this scene won't be so hard to believe:
There is no vacuum in space. Not the way you're thinking.
Space is just empty.
It doesn't "suck" like the vacuum cleaner in your home.
It doesn't have "strength" at all.
It's just empty.
When you are in a ship in space, the air pressure inside the ship is probably around 0.8 atm (atmospheric pressure).
That's about equal to the atmospheric pressure in Denver, Colorado, USA (this city is about 1 mile or 1.6 km above sea level).
The atmospheric pressure of space is 0 atm.
The difference between inside and outside is 0.8 atm.
Now, imagine you're on an ocean beach somewhere and you're sipping some delicious drink through a straw.
The difference between the air inside your mouth and outside your mouth is pretty close to 0.8 atm, give or take.
That's it.
Ripley is climbing that ladder against forces just about as strong as the force you put on your delicious drink when you suck it up a straw.
If your cheeks are that strong, I bet your arms are too.
OK, OK, it's not quite that simple.
Ripley opened a big door.
Space is not "sucking" the air out because space doesn't have any way to "suck" anything.
The air in the ship is going out the door because air ALWAYS flows from higher pressure areas to lower pressure areas.
All gasses and liquids do that.
With that much air blowing past Ripley, Newt, and Bishop, that's creating wind as the blows past them pretty fast.
How much wind?
I did some googling and the best info I could find from a bunch of science and math geeks is something like 100-120 mph winds.
But that's only during the first instant.
That number drops immediately as there is less and less air in the ship so the wind slows down.
Also, the door didn't open instantly. It slid open over a few seconds.
So the initial wind would be slower, getting stronger, up to a max of 120 mph but since some air leaked out while the door was slowly opening, it would never really hit that max.
So maybe 100, maybe 110 mph.
That is equal to a strong hurricane.
Strong enough to knock over fences and trees and maybe even flatten some houses.
That's a lot.
But those things are all like big sails and those winds are hitting a huge surface.
Ripley's head is not a sail and it's a much smaller surface.
More googling led me to a university meteorology site which told me that terminal velocity to lift an average person up and blow them away is around 120 mph.
If you're standing and get with with a wind roughly 70-110 mph, it will probably knock you to the ground but won't blow you away, unless you're a child or smaller than average adult.
That doesn't include holding onto things.
If you're holding onto a solid stationary object, it takes extra wind force equal to your arm strength.
If you can lift 50 pounds with one arm, then add that 50 pounds to the force it takes to break your grip and blow you away.
That takes us up to 170 mph.
But the actual force on Ripley is much lower than that, so she should be fine.
To summarize, the wind force blowing against Ripley is almost but quite not enough to blow her out the airlock if she's just sleeping on the ground.
And if she's holding onto something, no chance, it won't blow her out.
Is she strong enough to climb against that much wind?
Remember, the force is dwindling every second, so every second it gets easier to climb.
In that case, it seems believable.
Final thought: I'm much more worried about whether there's enough air in the ship for Ripley, Newt, and Hicks to breathe after so much blew out.
I'm sure the ship has extra air in tanks.
How fast can it restore atmosphere?
Scary thought.
But after consideration, this is a military ship.
I assume it has been built with the idea that other ships might shoot at it and make holes in it.
So it has systems to automatically close airtight doors and pump reserve air into any area that needs it.
Thanks for the question!
I had fun researching this; hopefully somebody has fun reading it.
Great mix of horror scifi and action love this film watched it tons!!!
Fun reaction! The facial expressions were gold lol. The director's cut is almost a different movie. So much more was put in. To me it actually moves faster than the theatrical. And the aliens are in it more.
So many video games owe their existence to this movie.
The fact that you’re not “feeling” the slime means it’s working, lol
Really thoughtful reaction, and you two have a nice dynamic. I imagine I'm not alone in saying it would be good to see more reactions with you both together
Wrong version, though....if a Gamer in 2014
@@dallesamllhals9161 Forgive me, but I'm not sure what you are referring to?
@@nathanruggles Ellen had a daughter...
Forgive me, if you don't know who Ellen is?
The great thing about the Alien franchise is how different all of the films are. Overall, this is probably the best film in the series, production-wise at least but I'm sure you'll find plenty to appreciate in Alien 3 as well. Hope to see the reaction soon! Best wishes!
You should’ve watched the extended cut. It would’ve filled you in on Ripley’s loss of her daughter who grew old and died waiting for her mother to come home. And why she’s attached to Newt
Great movie that just doesn’t really age much at all. I think it’s good to remember the context. A lot of the themes and storylines that seem run of the mill to us now weren’t cliched back then. There have been so many movies that have come out in the 37 years since this was released, that have been inspired by and borrow from Alien and Aliens. These two movies along with Terminator revamped the sci-fi/horror genre, so you can’t really call think of them as “run of the mill”. They pretty much are the mill that established the standard. As a kid Ellen Ripley and Indiana Jones were my favorite action heroes by far. I haven’t seen any characters that approach them in their appeal since.
Well said
In the special edition she asked for he daughter, but they tell her that she died because was old like 70 years some like that , and she cried, that s why she feels some feelings for the child
You really need to see the cut portions of the movie. Ripley finding out about her daughter, the scenes on Hadley's Hope and the iconic and most well known deleted scene, The Sentry Guns. Also on the gear the marines have, it's common practice for marines of the USCM to customise their gear. It's great to see people discover this movie and enjoy it but take it from me, watch the directors cut, it is so much better and adds a ton of context with the new scenes added.
I saw this in the theater when it came out. One of the best theater experences of my life with everybody cheering and screaming as it goes between horror and kick ass action.
This sadly is where the Alien movies end as far as being worth watching. Everything past this point is pretty bad.
I agree.
@@group-music ...said no one.
@@group-music Sure. Keep telling yourself that 🤣
@@group-music Stick with the voices in your head. 🤣 There are thousands of ratings and reviews to pick from, and not one of them will claim that turd "3" is better than Aliens
Alien 3 is well worth checking out. Especially if you can find the assembly cut. Its a totally different vibe again. Almost has a stage play feel. And a cinematic directorial debut for the fantastic david fincher.
I think you actually grow to like the soldiers!!!
Yes, a little reverse psychology. Set them up as assholes, then humanise them, then you don't know where your emotions are, and that's exactly how they pull you in further. They set you up to make assumptions and then destroy them in front of your face.
In the early 1990s in my home city Glasgow//Scotland they had an attraction called 'Alien War' located in the massive caverns underneath our main railway station where the colonial marines would escort you around a cool mockup of the aliens-esq set trying to escape the Aliens was a pretty cool experience.
15:25 I am totally convinced that neither of you were willing to look at the screen when, in _Alien_ (1979), Ripley torched the entire crew that the Xenomorph had taken alive into the air ducts and was converting to facehugger eggs.
You have to watch the movies to see them.