Many of you want to make complex sentences. I hope this video helps! Are you looking for PART 2? If so, click the link below! ruclips.net/video/DSZPv2HWj7Q/видео.html GOOD NEWS! I have just opened a website where you can get MORE EXPLANATIONS and EXTRA ACTIVITIES to help you practice and improve even faster! It is 100% FREE! Here’s the link: Englishspeaking360.com
Teacher, we are having difficulty finding a way to contact you to help us with some of our pending questions. Could you please provide us with your WhatsApp number or your email address? Thank you.
This is a very good lesson of English 's grammar. It is able to understand easily. Because you can explain very clear.I have brushed up my English today. Thanks you so much.
What an incredible 👏 😍 ❤amazing useful lesson dear professor may God bless you 🙏 we will be waiting on pins and needles to your terrifically interesting video ❤
HI About the sentence : A lawyer who specializes in labor law..... i can write: A lawyer who is specialised in labor law .... In fact , it is the verb : to be specialise ! thank a lot for your explainetions.
Yes, I did the exercise well. Thanks for the clear explanation! But example #9 would be written like this: The girl John met at the party last night works in a bank. I hope that's correct!
Teacher, thank you so much for these interesting lessons. Teacher I have two questions: 1)- in the video at 5.11, can we say : the chef from whom I learned the cooking makes delicious food ? 2)- In the sentence (the chef from whom I learned the cooking makes delicious food ), do we have to put commas after the word (chef) and after the word ( cooking) knowing that punctuation plays a big role in understanding ?? Thank you very much.
You have some great questions! Yes, you can switch the main clause and extra info around and make a different sentence. However, the focus of the sentence changes. As for commas, we use them when the information they contain is not necessary. In this example, the information is important, so commas shouldn't be used. Thanks for watching! 🤩🇨🇦
I have two problems. First, with reletive clause with proposition! I don't know what prepositions must be used and when to use those prepositions! Second When can't we replace which with that? I hope you make a video about them, too. Thank you for your informative video.
Those are excellent questions! 1. Using Prepositions in Relative Clauses: When a relative clause involves a preposition, the position of the preposition can change based on formality. For formal usage, the preposition goes before the relative pronoun (e.g., "the person to whom I was speaking"). In informal usage, it often appears at the end (e.g., "the person I was speaking to"). Common prepositions in relative clauses include to, with, for, and about. The choice depends on the verb or phrase used before the clause (e.g., “the person I am thinking of”). 2. When to Use "Which" vs. "That": "That" is typically used in defining (restrictive) relative clauses, where the information is essential to understand the noun (e.g., “The book that I borrowed is great.”). "Which" is preferred in non-defining (non-restrictive) clauses, where the information is additional but not essential (e.g., “The book, which I borrowed, is great.”). Note that in American English, "which" can also sometimes be used in defining clauses, but "that" cannot be used in non-defining ones.
Can you please find out gerunds in this paragraph? Hiking through the dense forest, we heard a twig snapping behind us. A deer was grazing nearby. The sun began setting, casting a warm glow on the tree tops. Being in the forest and listening to the sounds of nature calmed our souls. We enjoyed breathing in the fresh, earthy air.
Thank you so much! Please can we say in the 8th sentence The girl whom John met at the party last night workes at a bank. All my answers were correct except this one. Amazing video as always ❤
You got all the other sentences right! That's excellent! 🤩🇨🇦 You DO have a partial right answer on that one. The only difference is that you switched the main clause and the relative clause around. As a result, you shifted the focus from John to the girl. In some contexts it might be ok, but in others it might make a big difference in meaning.
The correct sentence is: "The company that launches a new product specializes in tech gadgets." Here’s why: Use "the" when referring to a specific company already known to the speaker and listener. Since we're talking about a particular company that launches new tech products, "the" is the appropriate choice. If you’re introducing a company for the first time in a general sense, "a company" would also be correct.
@@englishspeaking360 15:10 I mean A company that specializes in tech gadgets is launching a new product. Or A company that is launching a new product specializes in tech gadgets. Here which one is correct? I think here both are correct.
Is this example from an online dictionary correct? 'They speak a language akin to French.' It omits 'that is' or 'which is' after the word 'language.' BTW, I enjoy watching your videos a lot!
Yes, you can remove "that is" or "which is" in this sentence without changing its meaning. It would simply become: "They speak a language akin to French." In this case, the meaning remains clear, and the sentence sounds more concise. Both "that is" and "which is" function as relative clauses here, but if they're not needed for clarification, omitting them is perfectly acceptable.
Yes, in this case you would need commas. Commas show that the information they contain is not necessary. In this case: "The man that we saw at the restaurant is a famous actor." there are no commas because the information from the relative clause is necessary. Does that make sense?
THIS IS REALLY HELPFUL! I have a questionWhy here we can omit "which is". Main: This is an opera in seven parts. Extra: It is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus. This is an opera in seven parts which is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus. This is an opera in seven parts based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus. Can i change The dogs that are rescued from animal shelters are very lucky. into The dogs rescued from animal shelters are very lucky. ? THANKS SO MUCH
Yes, you can change "The dogs that are rescued from animal shelters are very lucky" to "The dogs rescued from animal shelters are very lucky." In English, relative clauses with "that" or "which" can sometimes be reduced by removing the relative pronoun (like "that" or "which") and the auxiliary verb (like "are"). This is known as a reduced relative clause. In this case: "The dogs that are rescued" becomes "The dogs rescued." This makes the sentence more concise while retaining the original meaning.
In the first example, "which is" can be omitted to form a reduced relative clause. When we say, "This is an opera in seven parts which is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus," we can omit "which is" to create a more concise sentence: "This is an opera in seven parts based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus." The reason we can omit "which is" is because "based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus" is acting as an adjective phrase describing "an opera in seven parts." English allows us to reduce relative clauses in cases like this, especially when they describe or clarify the subject. This reduction often improves the sentence's flow and readability by avoiding unnecessary words without changing the meaning.
Hmmm... I'm not sure what you mean. If you have only a main clause like "Who did Jun meet?" then WHO can’t be omitted. You can only omit WHO when it is not the subject of a relative clause.
"The horse THAT BELONGS to my neighbor won the race". The other way we can express the rule is; When A VERB FOLLOWS "THAT" or "WHICH" it can't be removed, you just can't leave it out.
Hello! Yes, that's a great way to explain it. However, it doesn't work for all relative pronouns. I wish it did. It would be so much easier to explain. Thanks for chiming in! Have a great day! 🌞
When relative pronoun is a subject in the relative clause, it can´t be dropped, but if it functions as an object there, we could either keep it or spare it. I wonder that is WHY a noun ( adv, conj ) or a relative pronoun 😅? Thank you, teacher.
I appreciate the love! I teach everything in my videos so I didn't think there was a need for a book. 😉 However, I have a website with easy explanations and extra activities. Check it out when you have time. Englishspeaking360.com
Could you please make a video on how get subtle difference between two words. Because english language has same words with subtle differences. I always find myself unable to understand this.
@indyanatureandpeace5694 Great! I have a playlist with a few similar videos. You might be interested. Here's the link. What is the difference? Words with similar meanings. Comparative grammar. English Speaking 360: ruclips.net/p/PLdDArlpQeGSZ-4waDSqMDPo0HZZg4hCxW
@@englishspeaking360 Thanks 🙏. I want you to make more videos on this topic. Some more confusing words are neglect and ignore, begin, start, commence, terrible and horrible, big,huge, enormous, gigantic, massive and so on.
Good question! It's a little technical but here's the explanation. In relative clauses, "that" can sometimes substitute for "who" or "which", but there are rules and subtle differences to keep in mind. 1. Who vs. That "Who" is used when referring to people. Example: She is the teacher who inspired me. "That" can also refer to people in restrictive (defining) clauses, though "who" is more common and preferred in formal English. Example: She is the teacher that inspired me. However, "that" is not typically used in non-restrictive (non-essential) clauses, where additional information is added. Example: My sister, who lives in New York, is visiting. (Correct) My sister, that lives in New York, is visiting. (Incorrect) 2. Which vs. That "Which" is used to refer to animals or things and is common in both restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. Restrictive Example: This is the book which helped me the most. Non-restrictive Example: This book, which I bought last year, is amazing. "That" can replace "which" in restrictive (defining) clauses when referring to things, but not in non-restrictive clauses. Example: This is the book that helped me the most. (Correct) This book, that I bought last year, is amazing. (Incorrect) Summary "Who" is for people; "which" is for things; "that" can replace either in restrictive clauses. "That" is not used in non-restrictive clauses, where "who" and "which" are preferred.
You said that WHOM and WHO can be omitted if they are not the subject. RIGHT ? BUT WHOM is used for the OBJECT, and it must never be used for THE SUBJECT.
The sentence is almost correct, but there’s a mistake with the use of "whom." It should be: "I learned cooking from the chef who makes delicious food." Use "who" instead of "whom" because "who" is the subject of the verb "makes." "Whom" is used as the object of a verb or preposition, but in this case, "who" is performing the action.
Hi! Nice try, but no cigar. A is the right article here because he is one of the lawyers with that specialty out of many. Using THE would mean that only one lawyer is specialized in labor law.
hellooo i have a question, can "by" be replaced with "Because of" on any of its meanings? like in She was shocked by the news or in My mom was saddened by my grades.
Hello! Replacing "by" with "because of" in these sentences would technically convey the reason, but it changes the tone and natural flow a bit: 1. "My mom was saddened because of my grades." 2. "She was shocked because of the news." While these sentences are grammatically correct, they sound a bit less natural. Using "by" feels more idiomatic and is typically preferred when describing emotional reactions triggered by something specific, like "saddened by" or "shocked by." So, while "because of" works, "by" is the better choice for a more natural, fluent style in this context.
@@englishspeaking360 thanks for the response! is it possible to do the same thing here? The flight was delayed by/because of bad weather to be honest those 2 words are giving me a lot of trouble 😭
![Eminem - Fuel (feat. JID) [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/t5H_CewqpKA/mqdefault.jpg)
Many of you want to make complex sentences. I hope this video helps! Are you looking for PART 2? If so, click the link below! ruclips.net/video/DSZPv2HWj7Q/видео.html
GOOD NEWS! I have just opened a website where you can get MORE EXPLANATIONS and EXTRA ACTIVITIES to help you practice and improve even faster! It is 100% FREE! Here’s the link: Englishspeaking360.com
Teacher, we are having difficulty finding a way to contact you to help us with some of our pending questions. Could you please provide us with your WhatsApp number or your email address?
Thank you.
@mustafmoallim You may contact me here. I usually reply to comments on my videos. 🤩
I can't wait for the second part!!!!! Thanks a lot.
Hello teacher, Please make a video with the compound sentence.
@srabonichy6666 Thanks for the suggestion!
The teacher who makes
English speaking 360 video is the best.
The video that i am watching is very important to learn.
Thank u a lot, God bless you
Your examples are excellent! Keep it up! 🤩🇨🇦
The way you taught us is very effective. Thank you so much, dear English teacher who has musical voice (which / that ) I love mostly.❤
Happy to hear that! Thanks for the feedback! 🤩👍
you are the best among the teachers,Thanks for sharing.
I'm glad you like my videos! 🤩 Thanks for watching!
This is a very good lesson of English 's grammar. It is able to understand easily. Because you can explain very clear.I have brushed up my English today. Thanks you so much.
Thanks for the kind words! 🤩🇨🇦 Keep up the good work!
Sir it is an excellent class. Thank you so much
Awesome! Glad you liked it! 🤩
Excellent sir
Thanks for watching! 🤩
I understood very well the usage of when the relative clauses can be omitted. In particular, it was very useful to know when "Whom" is used.
Excellent! I'm glad to help! Have a great day 🌞
Best teacher in work ❤
Best teacher in the world 🙏
Wow! Thank you so much! 😇😇😇
I understand your explanation and I liked very well, and I thank you, teacher.
I'm glad you found it helpful! 🤩🇨🇦
Very useful course 👍.. thank you sir 👌👌
Thanks for watching! 🤩🇨🇦
I love your classes very clear and specific to the topic. Thank you so much. You are the best.
I'm glad you liked it! 🤩🇨🇦
Thank you sir for the detail information and explanation of relative clauses ..🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
I'm glad it was helpful! 🤩
I am a big fan of you, lots of love and respect from India
Awesome! Thanks for being a fan! I hope my videos help you improve. 🤩🇨🇦
Thank you very much.
Welcome 😊
Thank you ,sir from Algeria 🇩🇿
Thanks for watching!
What an incredible 👏 😍 ❤amazing useful lesson dear professor may God bless you 🙏 we will be waiting on pins and needles to your terrifically interesting video ❤
Thank you! 😃 Glad to have you as a fan! I've just opened my own website, so if you need more practice, drop by englishspeaking360.com 🤩🇨🇦
this is the best video about relative clauses! thanks a lot!
Wow! Thank you so much! 🤩😇🤩Glad it was helpful!🤩🇨🇦
I have just learnt such a lesson at my English class!😊
Awesome! It's quite useful. I hope my video was easier to understand than your class. 😅
Thank you teacher
Have a blessing for everything
You're very welcome! Glad you liked it! 🤩
Sir very good accent and believable ❤
I'm glad you like it! 👍
Thank you very much sir, your videos are really informative and thay are making change in people's lives.🙏
Thank you so much for the feedback! You made my day! 🤩🤩🤩
I love your explanations
Thanks for the positive feedback! 😃
HI
About the sentence : A lawyer who specializes in labor law..... i can write: A lawyer who is specialised in labor law .... In fact , it is the verb : to be specialise !
thank a lot for your explainetions.
Yes, that works too! 🤩👍
THANK YOU
Great video, thank you so much!
Awesome! Thanks for watching!
Nice information ❤
First comment! Congrats! Thanks for watching!
Good morning teacher!
Good morning! Ready for some grammar? 🤩
Really you're great...
It was amazing lecture and explaining..
Thx a lot
Thanks for the kind words! 😊
Now, I've learned the topic better.
Glad to help! 🤩
@@englishspeaking360 Yeah.
Thank you for this amaziing video😊
I'm glad you found it helpful! 👍
Yes, I did the exercise well. Thanks for the clear explanation! But example #9 would be written like this: The girl John met at the party last night works in a bank.
I hope that's correct!
Yes, you're right. In that sentence WHOM or WHO can be omitted because it is the object of the relative clause.
Keep up the good work!
The lesson (that/which/ /) I saw this afternoon was important.
Excellent example! Keep up the good work! 🤩
Thanks for paying me atention when I asked you for this videos. Thanks my friend.
Thanks for the great idea! Sorry it took so long though 😰
@@englishspeaking360 It doesn't matter, the good things is you finally uploaded the video and even it's understandable.
Cheers! 🤩
Your explanation is easy to understand , l really enjoy watching your videos.
Awesome! I'm glad it's helpful! 🤩
Sir! I got nine out of ten, thank yu very much.
That's awesome! You're on the right track! 🤩
GREAT, THANK YOU.
Glad it was helpful!
Another good one, I really appreciate it! ; )
Tanks for guiding us through our English learning journey and keep uo the good job.
Thanks a lot! It's always a pleasure to hear from you! Have a great day! 🌞
Thank you for your lesson.
Would you give us a detailed lesson about present and past modal verbs ?
Great suggestion! I will add it to my list. 🤩👍
❤❤ thanks teacher excellent video 🎉
Thanks for watching! 🎉
Thank you 🙏
Thanks for watching! 🤩
Thanks for your lesson ❤
I'm glad you liked my video! 🤩🇨🇦
Amazing explanation
I'm glad it was helpful! 🤩
Thank you
You're welcome! 🤩
Excellent explanation. I enjoyed it very much!
Glad to hear that! Thanks for the feedback! 🤩
Superb sir 👌👍
Thanks so much! 🤩🇨🇦
Thank you for suspicious contents, please share and create this type of video daily basis.
You're welcome! Glad you found it helpful!🤩 By the way "suspicious" has a negative meaning. Maybe you had another word in mind.
This Chapter is 👌 🌲 SUGGESTIONS: (1) Lawler means Who is studing Law (2) Advocate means Who is Practising the Law
Hello! I'm from Canada 🇨🇦 and in American English, advocate is almost never used. Advocate is used in British English.
Wow! amazing! the best relative clauses on Yt! thanks a lot!
Thanks for watching! I'm happy to hear you liked the video! 🤩🇨🇦
Thank you for this video.I learned a lot from it.
I'm glad it was helpful! 🤩
Interesting! Good job 👏 👏 👏 👏 👍
Glad you liked it! Cheers! 🤩
❤
thank you so much .❤❤❤very useful video sir.
You're welcome! 🤩
Teacher, thank you so much for these interesting lessons.
Teacher I have two questions:
1)- in the video at 5.11, can we say : the chef from whom I learned the cooking makes delicious food ?
2)- In the sentence (the chef from whom I learned the cooking makes delicious food ), do we have to put commas after the word (chef) and after the word ( cooking) knowing that punctuation plays a big role in understanding ??
Thank you very much.
You have some great questions! Yes, you can switch the main clause and extra info around and make a different sentence. However, the focus of the sentence changes.
As for commas, we use them when the information they contain is not necessary. In this example, the information is important, so commas shouldn't be used.
Thanks for watching! 🤩🇨🇦
Super class 🙏
I'm glad you found it helpful! 🤩
Thank you! Great explanation!
Thanks for the visit! 🤩
Sir could I request you to make videos on simple sentences, compound sentences, and complex sentences and differentiate them. Please
Thanks for the suggestion. Let me see what I can do. 🇨🇦🤩
This is very useful! Thank you so much ❤
Awesome! Thanks for the feedback! 🤩🇨🇦
I have two problems. First, with reletive clause with proposition! I don't know what prepositions must be used and when to use those prepositions!
Second
When can't we replace which with that?
I hope you make a video about them, too. Thank you for your informative video.
Those are excellent questions!
1. Using Prepositions in Relative Clauses:
When a relative clause involves a preposition, the position of the preposition can change based on formality. For formal usage, the preposition goes before the relative pronoun (e.g., "the person to whom I was speaking"). In informal usage, it often appears at the end (e.g., "the person I was speaking to").
Common prepositions in relative clauses include to, with, for, and about. The choice depends on the verb or phrase used before the clause (e.g., “the person I am thinking of”).
2. When to Use "Which" vs. "That":
"That" is typically used in defining (restrictive) relative clauses, where the information is essential to understand the noun (e.g., “The book that I borrowed is great.”).
"Which" is preferred in non-defining (non-restrictive) clauses, where the information is additional but not essential (e.g., “The book, which I borrowed, is great.”).
Note that in American English, "which" can also sometimes be used in defining clauses, but "that" cannot be used in non-defining ones.
Thank you so much
Very useful video ❤
I'm glad it was helpful! 🤩🇨🇦
Can you please find out gerunds in this paragraph?
Hiking through the dense forest, we heard a twig snapping behind us. A deer was grazing nearby. The sun began setting, casting a warm glow on the tree tops. Being in the forest and listening to the sounds of nature calmed our souls. We enjoyed breathing in the fresh, earthy air.
O love your explanatios
👍❤wonderful!thank you
I'm glad you liked it! 🤩
I am always present ✋
Awesome! Thanks for being a fan! Keep up the good work! 🤩🇨🇦
Thank you so much!
Please can we say in the 8th sentence
The girl whom John met at the party last night workes at a bank.
All my answers were correct except this one.
Amazing video as always ❤
You got all the other sentences right! That's excellent! 🤩🇨🇦 You DO have a partial right answer on that one. The only difference is that you switched the main clause and the relative clause around. As a result, you shifted the focus from John to the girl. In some contexts it might be ok, but in others it might make a big difference in meaning.
@englishspeaking360 Ok,thank you for your clarification, teacher .
@Naj_820 No worries! Enjoy your weekend!
15:10
I think it's also correct.
A company that is launching a new product specializes in tech gadgets.
The correct sentence is:
"The company that launches a new product specializes in tech gadgets."
Here’s why:
Use "the" when referring to a specific company already known to the speaker and listener. Since we're talking about a particular company that launches new tech products, "the" is the appropriate choice.
If you’re introducing a company for the first time in a general sense, "a company" would also be correct.
@@englishspeaking360
15:10
I mean
A company that specializes in tech gadgets is launching a new product.
Or
A company that is launching a new product specializes in tech gadgets.
Here which one is correct?
I think here both are correct.
great! Would you carry on with subjunctive mood?
Thanks for the suggestion. The subjunctive is not used in English as much as in other languages, but I might make a video about it.
Is this example from an online dictionary correct? 'They speak a language akin to French.'
It omits 'that is' or 'which is' after the word 'language.'
BTW, I enjoy watching your videos a lot!
Yes, you can remove "that is" or "which is" in this sentence without changing its meaning. It would simply become:
"They speak a language akin to French."
In this case, the meaning remains clear, and the sentence sounds more concise. Both "that is" and "which is" function as relative clauses here, but if they're not needed for clarification, omitting them is perfectly acceptable.
Of course 😊
Thank you ❤
Thanks for watching! 🤩
English Speaking 360 is my new English teacher. 😎👍 Greetz from Switzerland
Awesome! Thanks for being a fan! 🤩🇨🇦
@@englishspeaking360 My new English teacher from Canada who I am a huge fan of is great. 😎👍BTW: Don't you need commas in such sentences?
Yes, in this case you would need commas. Commas show that the information they contain is not necessary. In this case: "The man that we saw at the restaurant is a famous actor." there are no commas because the information from the relative clause is necessary.
Does that make sense?
@@englishspeaking360 Thank you! 😎👍
The lesson was lovely that I saw on your RUclips channel. We can remove "that" because the subject is "I"😂
Exactly! "That" is tge object of the relative clause and it can be omitted. Good student! 🤩🇨🇦
The lesson I saw on your RUclips channel was lovely.
Please get videos on noun clauses & adverb clauses
Thanks for the suggestion! Let me see what I can do. 🤩
Thank you for reply
My pleasure! Have a wonderful day!
You explain things so well woah!!! :D
I'm glad you're finding the videos helpful! 😎👍
I got 9 out of 10
Thanks
That's great! Relative clauses are pretty difficult to master. Keep up the good work!
Yes,😊
Super⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Thanks for watching! 🤩
❤❤❤❤❤
Thanks for watching! 🤩
THIS IS REALLY HELPFUL! I have a questionWhy here we can omit "which is".
Main: This is an opera in seven parts.
Extra: It is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus.
This is an opera in seven parts which is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus.
This is an opera in seven parts based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus.
Can i change
The dogs that are rescued from animal shelters are very lucky.
into
The dogs rescued from animal shelters are very lucky.
?
THANKS SO MUCH
Yes, you can change "The dogs that are rescued from animal shelters are very lucky" to "The dogs rescued from animal shelters are very lucky."
In English, relative clauses with "that" or "which" can sometimes be reduced by removing the relative pronoun (like "that" or "which") and the auxiliary verb (like "are"). This is known as a reduced relative clause. In this case:
"The dogs that are rescued" becomes "The dogs rescued."
This makes the sentence more concise while retaining the original meaning.
In the first example, "which is" can be omitted to form a reduced relative clause.
When we say, "This is an opera in seven parts which is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus," we can omit "which is" to create a more concise sentence: "This is an opera in seven parts based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus."
The reason we can omit "which is" is because "based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus" is acting as an adjective phrase describing "an opera in seven parts." English allows us to reduce relative clauses in cases like this, especially when they describe or clarify the subject.
This reduction often improves the sentence's flow and readability by avoiding unnecessary words without changing the meaning.
@@englishspeaking360 y
Thanks a lot ！！
Sir, make a video on singular and plural uses of scissors, pants, shorts etc..
Good idea! I'll see what I can do.
Thanks for your fantastic teaching, I have a question. Can we ask, who did Jun meet? In this case we can omitted that Claus
Hmmm... I'm not sure what you mean. If you have only a main clause like "Who did Jun meet?" then WHO can’t be omitted. You can only omit WHO when it is not the subject of a relative clause.
Thanks a lot
Sir i have got 9/10 marks
Wow, that's awesome! You must be getting good at relative clauses! 👍 Watch part 2 as well!
"The horse THAT BELONGS to my neighbor won the race".
The other way we can express the rule is;
When A VERB FOLLOWS "THAT" or "WHICH" it can't be removed, you just can't leave it out.
Hello! Yes, that's a great way to explain it. However, it doesn't work for all relative pronouns. I wish it did. It would be so much easier to explain.
Thanks for chiming in!
Have a great day! 🌞
When relative pronoun is a subject in the relative clause, it can´t be dropped, but if it functions as an object there, we could either keep it or spare it.
I wonder that is WHY a noun ( adv, conj ) or a relative pronoun 😅? Thank you, teacher.
❤
Have a great day! 🤩🇨🇦
Do you have the book the same as you teaching on line I can buy it please .
You are the best ❤❤❤❤
I appreciate the love! I teach everything in my videos so I didn't think there was a need for a book. 😉 However, I have a website with easy explanations and extra activities. Check it out when you have time. Englishspeaking360.com
Could you please make a video on how get subtle difference between two words. Because english language has same words with subtle differences. I always find myself unable to understand this.
Hello! Do you mean like this: ruclips.net/video/E9TMpd2rglI/видео.html
If you have other ideas of confusing words, let me know.
@@englishspeaking360 yes, you got it right.
@indyanatureandpeace5694 Great! I have a playlist with a few similar videos. You might be interested. Here's the link. What is the difference? Words with similar meanings. Comparative grammar. English Speaking 360: ruclips.net/p/PLdDArlpQeGSZ-4waDSqMDPo0HZZg4hCxW
@@englishspeaking360 Thanks 🙏. I want you to make more videos on this topic. Some more confusing words are neglect and ignore, begin, start, commence, terrible and horrible, big,huge, enormous, gigantic, massive and so on.
Enjoy your Friday!
You too! 🤩
❤❤❤👏👏👏👍👍👍
Does that mean we can always use that instead of who or which. Any difference among them🙏🙏🙏
Good question! It's a little technical but here's the explanation.
In relative clauses, "that" can sometimes substitute for "who" or "which", but there are rules and subtle differences to keep in mind.
1. Who vs. That
"Who" is used when referring to people.
Example: She is the teacher who inspired me.
"That" can also refer to people in restrictive (defining) clauses, though "who" is more common and preferred in formal English.
Example: She is the teacher that inspired me.
However, "that" is not typically used in non-restrictive (non-essential) clauses, where additional information is added.
Example: My sister, who lives in New York, is visiting. (Correct)
My sister, that lives in New York, is visiting. (Incorrect)
2. Which vs. That
"Which" is used to refer to animals or things and is common in both restrictive and non-restrictive clauses.
Restrictive Example: This is the book which helped me the most.
Non-restrictive Example: This book, which I bought last year, is amazing.
"That" can replace "which" in restrictive (defining) clauses when referring to things, but not in non-restrictive clauses.
Example: This is the book that helped me the most. (Correct)
This book, that I bought last year, is amazing. (Incorrect)
Summary
"Who" is for people; "which" is for things; "that" can replace either in restrictive clauses.
"That" is not used in non-restrictive clauses, where "who" and "which" are preferred.
🎉🎉🎉
Thanks for watching! 😀
Sir, long time no see! In quiz time, question 4, if we omitted are as well, can we omit that or which?
Yes, that works! 🤩👍
Hey teacher!
How are you doing today?
I'm doing great! How about you?
You said that WHOM and WHO can be omitted if they are not the subject. RIGHT ?
BUT WHOM is used for the OBJECT, and it must never be used for THE SUBJECT.
Hello! At 6:55 I explain that WHOM is never the subject of a relative clause.
❤🎉.
🤩
Can I make the sentence like this?……I learned cooking from the chef whom makes delicious food.
The sentence is almost correct, but there’s a mistake with the use of "whom."
It should be: "I learned cooking from the chef who makes delicious food."
Use "who" instead of "whom" because "who" is the subject of the verb "makes." "Whom" is used as the object of a verb or preposition, but in this case, "who" is performing the action.
@englishspeaking360 thank you very much, I got it.
@คุณลีลาวดี Glad to help! Enjoy your weekend! 🤩
I m the guy that understand better after your lesson
Awesome! Glad to help! Thanks for watching! 🤩🇨🇦
👍👍👍👍👍
🤩🤩🤩
This is Saturday I think you are enjoying your week end 😊😊
You are absolutely right! 😊 I hope you enjoy your weekend too!
Of course I am enjoying 😊
The relative clause pronoun that is wich is use in the case the subject is odject or a thing ?
04:08
I think it should be
The lawyer who specializes in labor law represented us in court.
Here article "the" should be used not "a"
Hi! Nice try, but no cigar. A is the right article here because he is one of the lawyers with that specialty out of many. Using THE would mean that only one lawyer is specialized in labor law.
@@englishspeaking360
Ok its mean both are correct depending on situations.
hellooo i have a question, can "by" be replaced with "Because of" on any of its meanings? like in
She was shocked by the news
or in
My mom was saddened by my grades.
Hello! Replacing "by" with "because of" in these sentences would technically convey the reason, but it changes the tone and natural flow a bit:
1. "My mom was saddened because of my grades."
2. "She was shocked because of the news."
While these sentences are grammatically correct, they sound a bit less natural. Using "by" feels more idiomatic and is typically preferred when describing emotional reactions triggered by something specific, like "saddened by" or "shocked by."
So, while "because of" works, "by" is the better choice for a more natural, fluent style in this context.
@@englishspeaking360 thanks for the response! is it possible to do the same thing here?
The flight was delayed by/because of bad weather
to be honest those 2 words are giving me a lot of trouble 😭
360 surya kr yadav wale like karo