Errol Flynn como el General Custer y Olivia de Havilland como Elizabeth Bacon Custer. "Murieron con las botas puestas" (1941) de Raoul Walsh www.theendfarwest.blogspot.com...
stop with history, this is Art, and really Epic, still you wacht it and feel rise your soul and encourage your life, so this is far better most impostant in art than whatever other things. Awesome film
I know it's nowhere even close to being accurate to the point to where it's almost fiction, but as entertainment, I've always thoroughly enjoyed this battle scene.
I became fascinated with Custer’s Last Stand when I watched this movie with Dad as a kid. He cautioned me the film was “pure Hollywood” but such a battle really occurred. At least they didn’t have the Cheyenne and Sioux riding around Custer’s command in circles.
Larry Bittke Disney’s Tonka has a decent LSH scene. With Custer sitting and leaning on a dead horse, shouting orders. Tonka has one of the more realistic last stand scenes until son Of The Morning Star in 1991.
Highly romanticised of course but still the best movie version of Custer's last stand. Incidentally Sitting Bull stated that the Indians all had rifles and no Bows and Arrows. Always liked Anthony Quinn. Great actor.
Yes. I saw a colorized version on television about 20 years ago. But I don't recall which station it appeared on. ... One of my favorite flicks, in B/W or color.
For the record, the Native American's never rode around in a circle to be shot at. In fact, Wagon Trains actually made a square. The Circle came about because of Buffalo Bill's Wild West Show. Native Americans rarely attacked Large Wagon Trains, only a handful of times that happened. Usually, if you were in a Train of 80-100 Wagons you were pretty safe. Raiding party's didn't want to have to face 100 guns or more. They would attack small Trains and Individual wagons. Because they could outrun the horses, Railroad Train attacks were also rare. The Native American's were not stupid and usually attacked 'Soft Targets'. Individual isolated houses for example. Of course, disease, battle attrition, the extermination of their food sources, and the ability of the Army to fight in Winter all added up to inevitable defeat.
Pure entertainment there’s something wrong with you you must think like the same Europeans that all they wanted to do was wipe out the original people, It was 100% murder
Unfortunately, this was neither the first, nor the last historical event that Hollywood took liberties with to tell a story. From "Birth of a Nation" onward, Hollywod had always choose to give the Legend, rather than the truth. One day, before I leave here, someone is going to tell me what Hollywood had against the Union. P.S...I still like the way Custer's horse slid to a stop in "They Died With Their Boots On"!💀
As a Boomer, This Movie stirred our hearts with Glorious Hollywood Adventure BUT I must say "Son of the Morning Star" showed their demise in the wild Melee at the end quite accurately.........if only Commanche ould talk!
Battle didn't happen this way. Custer charged recklessly, into a trap. The Sioux and their Allies first cut off the rear of the column, and basically diced up the rest. At the end, I have heard, Custer was left with something like only 44 Men at the end. So it wasn't the whole Command.
The movie is more appreciated for the inner workings of the post Civil War Indian Wars politics than the overly heroic inaccurate depiction of the battle. The fact that incompetent military command and greedy politicians led to so many Native Americans (Whole Tribes), Settlers and Soldiers to die pointlessly in a violent unnecessary campaign of conquest was criminal itself.
@biomedsci1 Fine, but I liked it from the first time I saw it and lack of historical accuracy won´t change that. Besides that, the film is a Classic...
actually NO, he had his hair cut the previous day so long gone was the flowing locks, and he was not wearing the buckskin jacket. either. Brother Tom Custer may have but that is inconclusive too.
It is probably a guinness book record for the highest number of eagles feathers seen in one day, or film for that matter, even beating Hitchcock's 'Birds', by a few thousand at least!
When I watch this old movie which is only about 50 plus years after the actual battle i cant see but maybe half of the tomb stones they say 286 soldier How many actually died
Historically incorrect but I always loved the battle scene. As an aside I am amused at how many of the "Indians" are depicted as wearing full war bonnets. All chiefs and no indians?
A warrior wore an eagle feather for every coup counted or enemy killed. Many would have had war bonnets; they were not the sole headr gear of chiefs. (I hate it when people reveal their ignorance)
This doesn’t depict the thousands of warriors that actually fought at the battle. Chief Two Moons said they swirled around the soldiers like water around a stone.
Thrilling entertainment,...complete fantasy. Custer had divided his force into three elements and attacked an unsuspecting village from two sides, killing many woman and children. The warriors rallied , drove back Benteen and wiped out Custer and the men who were with him. There was no elaborate “ Indian ambush “, this was a defensive counter attack against a surprise attack on a sleeping village.
A very good fight scene and well done to everyone who was involved. However, in reality, Custer and his own force, were easily blown away by the Indians. A very shocking incident, showing the horror of this. Children were also shot dead here. :(
@@alanpeterson6224 Try not to make horrible, sneering comments like that. Where are you from? Somewhere where you think your opinion is the only one that counts? Don't be so nasty. And yes, there were children there. Custer was after them with the Native American women to use them as hostages. Two children died in the gunfire. Get that looked up.
This is nothing like how it happened if you looked it up on RUclips the army wasn't all together on a group like it is hear they were all scattered and died all over the place and this shows Custer being a hero if u look it up on RUclips hes the one that tell people there's gold in the black hills.
maybe he made mistakes but he was a man and he died with the boots on, he is the american soul, the american spirit, nobody can take this land, im cuban but my kids are american and im proud of that , im americam, thats it...
UN ASESINO ES LO QUE SIEMPRE FUE,O NO CONOCES LA HISTORIA DE CUSTER,INDISCIPLINADO, ARROGANTE,,,Y SENTIA ODIO POR LOS VERDADEROS NATIVOS DE ESAS TIERRAS,UN ASESINO,ESO FUE CUSTER,DEJEN DE ADORNARLO.
It's the movies. 1941. We were getting in the war. Heroes. Sacrifice. Patriotism. If Curtiz got one thing right, he captured the sweep of it, I believe.
Question Could Custer and Reno together with the whole troops withstood the attack I don't think so But Custer never had a chance The only way would have been to cut and shoot his way through A report in 1962 says he rode right in the whole group of warriors
The battle is very close to how happen in reality, because the Custer's division fought with courage until the end; Custer divided his ; Custer died by two bullet wounds and his body was respected, while the others soldiers' corpses were mutilated (took their scalps, hearts and visceras) his battalion divided into 3 sub units (2 of them in pursuit for Indians which some fought bravely as they could while others trapped in despair escaped terrified but still many soldiers were killed shamefully)
That summary contains about as much fiction as this Hollywood movie clip. I'll just pick one point though; it's very 'pop history' to say Custer was respected, Lakota and Cheyenne accounts say they didn't know Custer was there until well after the fighting, and not only that but some have stated that he wasn't mutilated because he was a suicide and it was bad luck to take the scalp of a suicide.
@@Montague1428 and the one said to be custer had his ears penetrated with sewing awls by the native women so "he could hear the death cries of the Sioux women and children"
Historically accurate? Probably not, but a well shot and directed film. Not with the special effects of today, probably cost too much to film it the same way today without using CGI.From what I can gather it was at best a bad command decision or at worst a desire for all the glory. Having all 3 columns out of site of each other was very bad, should have had scouts out watching what was going on with the other columns. But having pushed his men and horses so hard to get there ahead of General Terry was the stupidest thing. Had they taken their time and been rested, the result might have been different or Custer might have been arrested and court-martialed for disobedience of orders. Just my humble opinion
Me gustaba hinchar por los dueños de cada que pena tan grande ver como los que tienen el poder de las armas arrasan con todo no existe el perdón ni la misericordia ni l justicia todo es lenguaje de armas y muerte!
Very few officers were intelligent, give a Sgt Mgr or Cmd Sgt Mgr any day and I would plan battles with their advice. Great movie though inaccurate in how the battle occurred. Still a very entertaining movie.
@terry waller : That are very interesting views. Indians were known for their asymmetrical warfare, that's true. Conventional tactics didn't work against them. Thank you very much 👍
I read about some bloody defeats of union troops against indians after civil war, but i blamed it to the fact that US - soldiers often were still armed with old fashioned one - shot - rifles, while the Indians already used Winchester and Revolver - rifles. I would never have guessed that the Indians were consulted by former CSA officers ! The contempt of white officers for the indians was prevalent in their behaviour against the tribes.
And that's what happens when anglicised soldiers enter the fray...time for a cuppa tea lads. Well it worked against the spanish armada, along with a game of bowls of course...
Which myth? And which archaeologists? From what I've read, it proved Benteen a liar and the Lefties can't stand that. Nobody cut and ran, most died in place. That's what's been proved.
Just to be nit picky here, but there seems to be too many Native American deaths, the U.S. was not surrounded, but charged, from my research, Custer wasn't the last to die, as at least 28 troopers attempted to escape, but failed. The skirmish lines weren't really that organized, as, having recently been to the battlefield, the dead were scattered apart. Also, there were no trees at the battlefield, and the Native Americans went back to the battlefield for looting, I think.
In the real battle, less than 40 warriors went to the Happy Hunting Ground. And the dead ones were not a bunch of chiefs, killed in hand-to-hand combat while running around wearing feathered war bonnets. The shot where the Native American wearing a war bonnet with a long train of feathers runs into the battle and puts a lance through the Brit before Custer turns and blows him away is absurdity. (No Sioux warrior could ever earn that many feathers if he is prone to doing something that stupid in battle.) This movie makes it seem as though the only reason Custer lost was because there were thousands of Native Americans who just kept coming when the first ones were killed. Far from accurate.
@@jhoff1234 reports at the time state that there were a minimum of 2,000 warriors in the camp. Custer and the men with him died on last stand hill, because they were surrounded and couldn't flee.
Exactly!! According to historians & historical facts, it's believed Custer was one of the first killed. We don't know if that's completely accurate, but I believe some Indians who were there later said Custer was one of the first ones killed. Of course the cavalry was completely surrounded & vastly outnumbered, so there was no retreat for them, even with their commanding officer dead. The only survivor on the side of the cavalry was Myles Keough's horse Comanche, & he was wounded badly!
Кино
Para más información ver: theendfarwest.blogspot.com/
I love the way Custer ;is the last man on his feet, but then it was Errol Flynn, so he would be. Great entertainment.
Lo veo después de muuuuuchos años q nostalgia esos eran películas de verdad ..😥
Gracias por subir este video después de 5 décadas recién lo veo saludos.
stop with history, this is Art, and really Epic, still you wacht it and feel rise your soul and encourage your life, so this is far better most impostant in art than whatever other things. Awesome film
Good movie earl Flynn was the best
I know it's nowhere even close to being accurate to the point to where it's almost fiction, but as entertainment, I've always thoroughly enjoyed this battle scene.
Not on a hill but closer than you think as for realism
I became fascinated with Custer’s Last Stand when I watched this movie with Dad as a kid. He cautioned me the film was “pure Hollywood” but such a battle really occurred. At least they didn’t have the Cheyenne and Sioux riding around Custer’s command in circles.
Larry Bittke
Disney’s Tonka has a decent LSH scene. With Custer sitting and leaning on a dead horse, shouting orders. Tonka has one of the more realistic last stand scenes until son Of The Morning Star in 1991.
@@lindaterrell5535 Very true and you are one of the few to mention it too.
IKR
Love this scene
NOW that #D is available for B&W older films, I could love to see This film and The Charge Of The Light Brigade back to back or alone in 3-D.
Highly romanticised of course but still the best movie version of Custer's last stand. Incidentally Sitting Bull stated that the Indians all had rifles and no Bows and Arrows. Always liked Anthony Quinn. Great actor.
Good movie but Son of the Morning star is better and more accurately
Little Big Man has my favourite version. Custer is stultified by the realisation that he has got it all wrong.
they had no sabres at the little big horn because custer said they would make too much noise and custer and crazy horse never met.
The swords were also withdrawn because the sun would reflect from them and can be seen from a large distance across the plains.
Ecxellent Western movie. Errol Flynn. Sitting Bull, and Crazy Horse, Sioux with Lakotas.
This be is one of the most be underrated films in the history of film.oliviais Olivia and Flynn at his best.
Yes. I saw a colorized version on television about 20 years ago. But I don't recall which station it appeared on. ... One of my favorite flicks, in B/W or color.
早期西部紅番槍战片很好看請以後多播謝々。陈添福
Классно , динамично снято 👏👏👏 📽️ 📽️📽️ 🔫🏹, сегодня так не снимут - разучились ...
Como me gustan estas peliculas
For the record, the Native American's never rode around in a circle to be shot at. In fact, Wagon Trains actually made a square. The Circle came about because of Buffalo Bill's Wild West Show. Native Americans rarely attacked Large Wagon Trains, only a handful of times that happened. Usually, if you were in a Train of 80-100 Wagons you were pretty safe. Raiding party's didn't want to have to face 100 guns or more. They would attack small Trains and Individual wagons. Because they could outrun the horses, Railroad Train attacks were also rare. The Native American's were not stupid and usually attacked 'Soft Targets'. Individual isolated houses for example. Of course, disease, battle attrition, the extermination of their food sources, and the ability of the Army to fight in Winter all added up to inevitable defeat.
Brave Americans fought against invaders from Europe.
You mean the ones that come on the land bridge from Asia?
You don't watch this film for historical fact, it's pure entertainment.
and Pre War jingoism
Pure entertainment there’s something wrong with you you must think like the same Europeans that all they wanted to do was wipe out the original people, It was 100% murder
Love the music
Clasiconnn.. creo q tênia 9 años por ahí q nostalgia..😥😥😥
De niño alucinaba con la película ahora también
Cvchv
Afgxzgvxvbcbnmnxgxgxbvnbcvn
Ggxgzvzgc
Hvvvvn
JzgFgxgdk
Not actual history but as Alfred Hitchcock said " It's only a movie."
Esa batalla realmente ocurrió
Unfortunately, this was neither the first, nor the last historical event that Hollywood took liberties with to tell a story. From "Birth of a Nation" onward, Hollywod had always choose to give the Legend, rather than the truth. One day, before I leave here, someone is going to tell me what Hollywood had against the Union. P.S...I still like the way Custer's horse slid to a stop in "They Died With Their Boots On"!💀
The horse slid into 2nd base.🤩
@@geewhizz1970 But the Soiux still won the game.💀
As a Boomer, This Movie stirred our hearts with Glorious Hollywood Adventure BUT I must say "Son of the Morning Star" showed their demise in the wild Melee at the end quite accurately.........if only Commanche ould talk!
Battle didn't happen this way. Custer charged recklessly, into a trap. The Sioux and their Allies first cut off the rear of the column, and basically diced up the rest. At the end, I have heard, Custer was left with something like only 44 Men at the end. So it wasn't the whole Command.
Индейцы его просто обдурили. Заманили и уложили спать.
epic battle but greatly in-accurate according to historical facts and figures
I allways liked that movie 🍿🎥👍
The movie is more appreciated for the inner workings of the post Civil War Indian Wars politics than the overly heroic inaccurate depiction of the battle. The fact that incompetent military command and greedy politicians led to so many Native Americans (Whole Tribes), Settlers and Soldiers to die pointlessly in a violent unnecessary campaign of conquest was criminal itself.
LE MEILLEUR FILM QUI AIT ETE FAIT SUR CUSTER ET LA BATAILLE DE LITTLE BIG HORN.
The Real 7th Cavalry did not carry their Sabers into the battle of the Little Big Horn, they were afraid their noise would alert
the Sioux.
Did anyone notice the auto tire tread marks on the ground during the beginning of the charge?
Que buena paliza le dieron los indios,a pesar de sufrir tantas bajas
Хотели окунуться в кровь индейцев. Их женщин и детей. А утонули в своей.
With or without historical accuracy, the film is equally excellent...
سيالعح
@biomedsci1 It´s your opinion....No present-day actor could play those roles like Errol Flynn...
English please...
@biomedsci1 Fine, but I liked it from the first time I saw it and lack of historical accuracy won´t change that. Besides that, the film is a Classic...
@biomedsci1 The film became a Classic because not everyone thought like you
Has anyone seen the spoof western 'They died with their knickers on?' and tell me where I can get a copy?
1:12 i love the look on custer's face. the real custer must have looked pretty much the same.
actually NO, he had his hair cut the previous day so long gone was the flowing locks, and he was not wearing the buckskin jacket. either. Brother Tom Custer may have but that is inconclusive too.
Нет. Он просто обхезался. Хотел под шумок сбёгнуть один. Не получилось.
A classic movie :
" And all died wearing boots"
Erroll Flinn in the role of Custer.
Not for long if they fitted the indians!
Little big Horn, the greatest Indian victory against the US cavalry.
Never wear a wooden board under your jacket.It seems to attract arrows!
Especially with the bulls eye showing
The charge of the " custer brigade " mmm!! .
Yeah , it is pure Hollywood but most of the knowledge of this battle started coming out in the 1990 's .
@Bodoque By archaeology
I
QUE PELICULA
BEST FILM ON CUSTER AND THE BATTLE OF LITTLE BIG HORN.
Wrong. The best by a Lakota mile is Son of the Morning Star. Few have seen it.
My goodness, how many eagle feather warbonnets did the studio own?
It is probably a guinness book record for the highest number of eagles feathers seen in one day, or film for that matter, even beating Hitchcock's 'Birds', by a few thousand at least!
Tengo entendido que fueron los siux los que acabaron con Coster en Litle Horse.
Was this movie colorized?
When I watch this old movie which is only about 50 plus years after the actual battle i cant see but maybe half of the tomb stones they say 286 soldier
How many actually died
The Souix fighting to defend the land they stole from the Arakawa. Yeah, that's the part no one talks about.
Historically incorrect but I always loved the battle scene. As an aside I am amused at how many of the "Indians" are depicted as wearing full war bonnets. All chiefs and no indians?
all plains indiana word war bonnets into battle
If you look more closely, most of those are not chiefs, but traffic wardens due to the unusual amount of horse traffic expected that day!
Oh and they work for the local council, so yes, more chiefs than indians.
@@nialloneill5097 😂😂😂🤣 That's hilarious!!
A warrior wore an eagle feather for every coup counted or enemy killed. Many would have had war bonnets; they were not the sole headr gear of chiefs. (I hate it when people reveal their ignorance)
Pretty rough stuff for 1941. I like it!
Not historically accurate but entertaining anyhow.
This doesn’t depict the thousands of warriors that actually fought at the battle. Chief Two Moons said they swirled around the soldiers like water around a stone.
Final score. Redskins 268 Troopers 34
the 2nd half was cancelled because of the massive score imbalance, the remaining cavalry refused to leave the locker room
Thrilling entertainment,...complete fantasy. Custer had divided his force into three elements and attacked an unsuspecting village from two sides, killing many woman and children. The warriors rallied , drove back Benteen and wiped out Custer and the men who were with him. There was no elaborate “ Indian ambush “, this was a defensive counter attack against a surprise attack on a sleeping village.
great stunts
A very good fight scene and well done to everyone who was involved.
However, in reality, Custer and his own force, were easily blown away by the Indians. A very shocking incident, showing the horror of this. Children were also shot dead here. :(
D J : Try reading some actual History. Where are you from? Pakistan? Elbonia? There were no children at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
@@alanpeterson6224 Try not to make horrible, sneering comments like that. Where are you from? Somewhere where you think your opinion is the only one that counts? Don't be so nasty. And yes, there were children there. Custer was after them with the Native American women to use them as hostages. Two children died in the gunfire. Get that looked up.
@@alanpeterson6224 at least three children were killed www.nps.gov/libi/learn/historyculture/gall.htm
General Custer got in love with his Fame that preceded him. Fatal mistake.
This is nothing like how it happened if you looked it up on RUclips the army wasn't all together on a group like it is hear they were all scattered and died all over the place and this shows Custer being a hero if u look it up on RUclips hes the one that tell people there's gold in the black hills.
Custer was gèrman
Spot on, SF.
Custer maldito insensato.... solo a el se le podia ocurrir esta locura.....
maybe he made mistakes but he was a man and he died with the boots on, he is the american soul, the american spirit, nobody can take this land, im cuban but my kids are american and im proud of that , im americam, thats it...
ya he died and had his private parts placed in his mouth, and sewing awls stuck thru his ears to hear better in the afterlife. heroic yes siree
he died with the boots on🤣🤣😂😂😂😂i PERSONALLY BELIEVE that a fool would take off his boots while fighting
UN ASESINO ES LO QUE SIEMPRE FUE,O NO CONOCES LA HISTORIA DE CUSTER,INDISCIPLINADO, ARROGANTE,,,Y SENTIA ODIO POR LOS VERDADEROS NATIVOS DE ESAS TIERRAS,UN ASESINO,ESO FUE CUSTER,DEJEN DE ADORNARLO.
Historically, this depiction of the battle was about accurate as Paris Hilton portraying Mother Teresa as a West Coast party girl.
It's the movies. 1941. We were getting in the war. Heroes. Sacrifice. Patriotism. If Curtiz got one thing right, he captured the sweep of it, I believe.
@@formwiz7096 kdkeedhkkekkskslkwwowlwkwkeekwkelwekwlwkekwkdkekdkkekkdldkdkddkkwelwkklsidkskdkldskllskodkslkclalkdlsjmcslskdkdkfkdkkdlskslkclskldkdlskwelwkkdlkdlekslslododkksdllwdkdklskepwkslkdlskfldlkddksksjkefjlwkkcidjkfljcjcekjfkflgifjkfldmei, mkdkkclkfkfkmfjfdloimdjslslfjeklclkeemfrlwllcldkjdksdlsodol
L
Dkldkdkckckkckfllwlpskwksllskkdkslpslqldkckdkslkfoslkllpdldlldslklwldkaldkwkdsldkksmslsskslslkkddlslllskdkksklkkklskkslslldlkslkslkdkdzkkkkdlskkdkkjkkkdkkdkskslwkdkwksksslsksldlwlwlskwkwllskkwkw oluşmakta, solwlwsksspqlsoelwlelwlsldofdkkclplllpll
Lxlsdkskdkkdkdkskkdldlkdlkdskdjkdkdkskkdkkskkdlksskkkksldksl
Я люблю Пэрис Хилтон☺️
Honor for Indian warriors, they fought for their freedom
Exactly.
Точно. И дураками в бою не были. Дураков заманили.
Not their Freedom. Their lands too!
And for their god.
And for their god.
Indians displayed good tactical thinking luring Custer into the trap. Nicely done scene
Custer didn't bring his saber
Custers ego got them sll killed... And as quickly as it takes to eat a dinner.
Индейцы-молодцы!!!
Muy buena peli. al fin toro sentado se SENTO en su caballo y al ataque.😁
Is one history incorrect
It's only Hollywood doing this
Love the old Hollywood movie s like this
Question
Could Custer and Reno together with the whole troops withstood the attack
I don't think so
But Custer never had a chance
The only way would have been to cut and shoot his way through
A report in 1962 says he rode right in the whole group of warriors
ENTERREM MEU CORAÇAO NA BEIRA DO RIO
Custer didnt have the "Nelson touch" thats for sure!
He was the premier Indian fighter of the post Civil War Army, but he won his fights more by guile than force. It's why the fight was such a shock.
The battle is very close to how happen in reality, because the Custer's division fought with courage until the end; Custer divided his ; Custer died by two bullet wounds and his body was respected, while the others soldiers' corpses were mutilated (took their scalps, hearts and visceras) his battalion divided into 3 sub units (2 of them in pursuit for Indians which some fought bravely as they could while others trapped in despair escaped terrified but still many soldiers were killed shamefully)
That summary contains about as much fiction as this Hollywood movie clip. I'll just pick one point though; it's very 'pop history' to say Custer was respected, Lakota and Cheyenne accounts say they didn't know Custer was there until well after the fighting, and not only that but some have stated that he wasn't mutilated because he was a suicide and it was bad luck to take the scalp of a suicide.
@@Montague1428 and the one said to be custer had his ears penetrated with sewing awls by the native women so "he could hear the death cries of the Sioux women and children"
***FREEDOM IS"NT FREE LET'S SAVE BURMA***
****THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS VIDEO****
It Bravo Sierra, historically, but cool.
What about the hundreds of horses who died in the making of this and other films
WHAT WAS CUSTER LAST WORDS TO HIS MEN BEFORE HE DIED AT TH LITTLE BIGHORN.
Historically accurate? Probably not, but a well shot and directed film. Not with the special effects of today, probably cost too much to film it the same way today without using CGI.From what I can gather it was at best a bad command decision or at worst a desire for all the glory. Having all 3 columns out of site of each other was very bad, should have had scouts out watching what was going on with the other columns. But having pushed his men and horses so hard to get there ahead of General Terry was the stupidest thing. Had they taken their time and been rested, the result might have been different or Custer might have been arrested and court-martialed for disobedience of orders. Just my humble opinion
Sheer safety would dictate filming it differently. SOme of those collisions were nuts. 3 people died in horse related accidents when they made this.
Is this Johnk Wayne movie?
No
Una de las peliculas que aún,quisieron presentar la figura del criminal Custer como héroe...El Tiempo y La Verdad demostraron otra verdad...
❤️❤️❤️ ) . 🙏 . -God bless all of you. ❤️.🎶 💐. ❤️
Me gustaba hinchar por los dueños de cada que pena tan grande ver como los que tienen el poder de las armas arrasan con todo no existe el perdón ni la misericordia ni l justicia todo es lenguaje de armas y muerte!
"Custer was a fool, he rode to his death"..Gall Cheyenne chief.
Very few officers were intelligent, give a Sgt Mgr or Cmd Sgt Mgr any day and I would plan battles with their advice. Great movie though inaccurate in how the battle occurred. Still a very entertaining movie.
Wow, what a clueless clown as Gall was a Hunkpapa.
Custer was stupid enough to divide his troops despite his experiences of civil war.
@terry waller : That are very interesting views. Indians were known for their asymmetrical warfare, that's true. Conventional tactics didn't work against them. Thank you very much 👍
@terry waller : I can't imagine that confederate officers would give enemy sioux advises. You think it's possible ?
I read about some bloody defeats of union troops against indians after civil war, but i blamed it to the fact that US - soldiers often were still armed with old fashioned one - shot - rifles, while the Indians already used Winchester and Revolver - rifles. I would never have guessed that the Indians were consulted by former CSA officers ! The contempt of white officers for the indians was prevalent in their behaviour against the tribes.
Is that movie showing how Whites killed non Whites?
Yes but Reno and Bentine arrived after the battle so no one knew what happened during it.
Archeologists have now proven the myth is wrong.
And that's what happens when anglicised soldiers enter the fray...time for a cuppa tea lads. Well it worked against the spanish armada, along with a game of bowls of course...
Which myth? And which archaeologists? From what I've read, it proved Benteen a liar and the Lefties can't stand that. Nobody cut and ran, most died in place. That's what's been proved.
@@formwiz7096 no last stand hill was no a defensive posture. custer's men were in full retreat and stragglers were being killed off as there were.
Ahhh very romantic.
look up Jack Macaul .
Soy loco bandito! Jajajaja!
Эх, не добили
Eu bem que avisei o Cluster para não perturbar o Touro Sentado mas teimoso como ele era deu nisso aí !
Just to be nit picky here, but there seems to be too many Native American deaths, the U.S. was not surrounded, but charged, from my research, Custer wasn't the last to die, as at least 28 troopers attempted to escape, but failed. The skirmish lines weren't really that organized, as, having recently been to the battlefield, the dead were scattered apart. Also, there were no trees at the battlefield, and the Native Americans went back to the battlefield for looting, I think.
In the real battle, less than 40 warriors went to the Happy Hunting Ground. And the dead ones were not a bunch of chiefs, killed in hand-to-hand combat while running around wearing feathered war bonnets. The shot where the Native American wearing a war bonnet with a long train of feathers runs into the battle and puts a lance through the Brit before Custer turns and blows him away is absurdity. (No Sioux warrior could ever earn that many feathers if he is prone to doing something that stupid in battle.) This movie makes it seem as though the only reason Custer lost was because there were thousands of Native Americans who just kept coming when the first ones were killed. Far from accurate.
@@jhoff1234 it's not a documentary. Son of the morning star is more accurate
@@jhoff1234 reports at the time state that there were a minimum of 2,000 warriors in the camp. Custer and the men with him died on last stand hill, because they were surrounded and couldn't flee.
gloria eterna a los guerreros nativos que se defendian del genocidio.
Yes
추악하고 잔악한 침략자 백인놈들에게 영원한 죽음을
No offense, but what's this have to do with Olivia?
Well she was gonna sing her song from Grease but it was cut at the last minute.
Why arnt these films on the telly anymore is it because it might upset the snowys
Custer the last man standing? Ha ha!
You do not pay the star man those kind of wages without eking as much out of his appearance as possible.
Exactly!! According to historians & historical facts, it's believed Custer was one of the first killed. We don't know if that's completely accurate, but I believe some Indians who were there later said Custer was one of the first ones killed. Of course the cavalry was completely surrounded & vastly outnumbered, so there was no retreat for them, even with their commanding officer dead. The only survivor on the side of the cavalry was Myles Keough's horse Comanche, & he was wounded badly!
This is not the battlefield terrain I’ve been there no way from an old Nam combat vet it’s all rolling hills an gullies an deep ravines
This picture and reality is purely incidental.
Foi suicídio lutar em campo.aberto os índios eram mais numerosos.souza.brasil.sp.diadema. 2020.