Going to throw this suggestion out to anyone who enjoys this game. Foxhole is to military games, what Project Zomboid is to zombie/survival games. Both isometric, and greatly detailed.
Logistics front line sounds pretty awesome. Bus people around sort of thing. Communicate friendly with players and drop them off to fight. Then drive back and do it again. Or maybe transfer materials idk. But mostly the olayer interaction sounds fun. Long drives too from one depot to another. I assume that’s a thing
Yesterday while driving a tank for 11 hours I had over 10 different people help me crew it. You meet new people all the time and can have great moments with them if you want.
I have no idea what you were talking about for most of that video, Probably because ive never played the game lol. But it gets a like from me just because I can see the effort thats gone into it. Great vid mate keep em coming.
5:14 There is a reason , why it should stay where it stands. Commends and ranks are just carrot for those who doing dirty job. Logi is obligatory aspect of game , you can't do anything without logi. If clan doing logi, it provides itself for combat content. Who will provide provide public fronts with equipment ? if logi will waste their time and don't get anything back after some point, fronts will fight with pistols. Those ,who say that the logistical aspect of the game is interesting are just growers of new logi players. They preparing new logi to decrease their time, spented on this endless grind . And if someone will do extra bmats trip for those 3 commends, fine. Rank is just carrot on fishing rod , for logi horses , which pulling war machine. TBH best way to farm commends is to lead clan activities. When you have 25+ people in discord and after you achive your goal everyone max commend each other is much more effetive. But once you hit mid rank, you don't really care about your rank anymore. Commends are dust . Those who ask for them are pitiful because they are still chasing carrots on a fishing rod. Sad ,that they don't have such system for good building. You can't commend person who builded and maintained really good defences. Because they usually offline or in another region. Also you suggesting kpi, but how to measure kpi for spotter of artillery , or tank driver , or organisation of something? The KPI of many roles can only be evaluated by other players. This is the current system. And nothing still prevents you from just logging into the game with your friends every day and commend each other. TLDR . Commends and ranks are here to compensate lack of fun in sertain aspects of game.
Either didnt watch the video or I really cant tell what you are on about. So builders dont deserve commends? people that spend a full day repairing dont deserve commends? scroopers? folks managing facilities, other logi than frontline logi? In your opinion, only people that do frontline logi should get notifications for commends? Really? That's really ungratefull of you. Is that what you do when you play? just farm commends on logi? Artilery, tanks other group activities are easy to manage. All xp gained by the squad should be shared by the squad... Next question? And By the way if you actually watched the video, you would hear me say it's exactly because commends are nonsense and meaningless now that they need to change... TO HAVE IMPORTANCE AND MEANING... I swear, some folks just read the first sentence of a book and leave a review criticizing it was not a good book...
Love the effort put into the video! I am really looking forward to getting foxhole one day, and it’s nice to see people praising it while also giving good constructive criticism to improve it. Please do a review of Elite Dangerous / Star Citizen! I really want to see how you think those games could improve, especially elite as it is a very expansive game with a dying player base.
I love this game! Have played it a bunch. My only problem with it is that there is a strong Minority of players, usually Regi members, who treat other players disrespectfully, bossing them around and making the gameplay experience hostile and unwelcomeing, if the goal is for the game to grow and thrive, then let other players enjoy themselves, and dont take it TOO seriously. Thats just my 5 cents worth
hmm you do realize the win rate on able is 55 to 52 right ? its almost 50/50 in my experience most regiments do stay their faction 95% of the time and if they switch they switch mostly because their own side shits on them . and the next wars colonial will most likely catch up again, their tanks got massive buffs . i do agree with your rank suggestion. i am a logi brig tho i do backline to midline frontline seaport logistics bringign in bulk material by freighters . i dont ask for commends i just get them, since i put my stuff in public so anyone can get it and supply frontline bunkers . i dont do that for comments lol . the biggest issue is that the servers poop out when more than 6k in totla play at the same time
In regards to the overall score, it's a bit irrelevant since most of the time there are streaks, some quite impressive. I would attribute those streaks to a variety of things, buffs or nerfs to the factions, but the amount and quality of regiments. And from my perspective, Organization on the battlefield is a major factor for winning, because the more organized and managed faction can take lesser assets and still churn out wins. This has varied and the overall count of victories is pretty much a tie, but, the presence of very long streaks speaks to something else. In my opinion, the presence and quality of numerous and organized regiments. Yeah the servers need a boost. I would much prefer they focus on that and increasing the player count than making more shards.
@@TheOnlySillySocks well from what i see the latest wars go quit the same , collonials make gains in the early war , stalemate in mid war, than warden push back . i think its more a burn out thing on colli side lately . i mean MSA stood 8 time in arti range of Weathered halls and couldnt capitalize on it and take it . i was playing warden last war so 108 . when i logged off i was like okey this time its done for and the east will fall. but they capitialize on their gains in asian time and got pushed back in EU 8 times . same with fox catcher . for the organization its leess , that wardens are more organized. we just help eachother more . people fromt he west front go east and vice versa . whiel collonials still clign to their coalition thing and hate eahc other as it seems ( this is just speculation from my side , from what i heared )
Yeah but that's exactly the point. If colonials keep getting most of the noobs late war like they have recently, because regiments leave, how are they going to organize anything to last? It's all about morale and if regiments aren't incentivized to stick around to the end, even when taking loses, vets leave and its just noobs. There needs to be something in play to incentivize those that tough it out to the end. Both vets and full regiments. People love bragging rights and giving loyal and persistent players and regiments rewards is the only way. I dont agree with just penalizing players to force them, I believe in clear and balanced incentives. So even if wardens where less organized, the fact players can leave or switch shards is bad for the gameplay, but necessary. Therefore incentives is the way to go.
@@TheOnlySillySocks they dont get more noobs late war , how do you come to that conclusion ? MSA was unable to capitalize on their tech advantage and got their teeth kicked in when it evened out . i never said anything about penelties O.o you cannot switch during a war and not allowing switches when you get bullied by your own side makes no sense . if you force people to stay on a side evn tho they dotn want to play there anymore for what ever reason they just stop playing at all . in all most every war wardens have more cassulaties. maybe wardens are just more tenacious and dotn give up
Right because the Germans got more casualties in WWII then the allies because they were tenacious, didn't give up and won at the end? If you are taking casualties into account the only correlation is, if a side takes more, and wins, it means their logistics where miles better to support that level of aggression and sacrifice. That's it. Factions have won with more and with less casualties. By the end of any war, the side that's losing always has more noobs on the front lines than the winning side. Maybe you don't know this because you don't fight that much and that's ok. the backlines always need more people. By the end of this last war, Colonials where over 95% lower ranks that Sergeants on the frontlines. Even some of the higher ranks where probably logi players that just wanted to get some action, and ended up making some huge mistakes. When one side begins to lose, regiments lose their bases and leave, it happens all the time. Most of the experienced players in logi leave if they lose their facility they worked to build. It's always a snow ball.
Talking about the regiment reward system, I think this could get very overwhelming for the game. The only thing I can really accept would be something like, regiments that stay over multiple wars or through out an entire war, or what ever. They get rewarded through some point system and the top 4 or 8 regiments(thinking about limiting network data needed to be transferred) at any time get their own arm bands or decals for example. Custom hat decals could also be cool. Custom reward systems that affect gameplay feels like it will just be cheesed to where everyone will combine into a few big regiments so that everyone gets the reward.
i really dont think that factionhopping is sucha big problem. all of the big regiments are loyal to their faction and once you have played as a faction for a few minutes you are locked to that faction for that war on that shard. You would have to use an alternate account to "factionhop" and the devs issue quite frequent permabans for people who are cought "alting" to sabotage
I didnt say all regs/vets do it. I said some have done it because it's allowed. And it should be, but the problem is there nonetheless. That's why I suggested rewarding loyalty and persistence as exemplified by the loyalty bonus conditions suggested for regiments that though it out. A clear example of the problem was the 3 shard period where 1 was basically for warden exp reg, one for colonial vets, and the third for newbies overall. Also, when I say vets leave a war, it includes people that stop playing, like I explained in the video. I never said the vets only change shards when losing, I said they leave when losing. There are many examples of full regiments that leave as soon as their main base is gone, and wait for the next war. But this video was for everyone. If I anticipated every way people could misunderstand anything I said on the video, it would an hour long, and most people that don't understand the game would not like it. However, not recognizing multiple shards are a problem because it allows people to switch wars when losing, both regiments and/or vets, is disingenuous. The fact that is a possibility means some have/will do it. I didnt mention alting because its a known problem equivalent to cheating imo and that's for the devs to tackle, and they already know it.
agree with some things but completely disagree with the regiment loyalty thing. Players should not be penalised for playing the other half of the game they bought
@@TheOnlySillySocks rewarding regiments that stay on one side means regiments that dont will not have access to the rewards, so basically they are missing out because of the way they choose to play the game. Honestly the amount of regiments that actually switch sides between wars is very, very small. I agree that vetstacking is a problem in this game, but its more of a "players migrate to the winning faction" problem rather than a "whole regiments switch sides" problem, and the root of that is the devs extremely erratic balancing decisions, or one side getting extremely burnt out from multiple win streaks
Well yes, that's the point. Those that fight for the whole war and dedicate themselves to a faction should be rewarded imo. It could be stuff that doesn't have an effect on the fight, but something that reinforces the value of dedication. I do agree with the rest but I'm not getting into balancing issues. They exist, but, depending on peoples favourite faction, it's a very angry subject xD
@@kostasprince6725 Infact I can only really think of one Regi that switches sides often - that been 1stFA - (Duri's Regi) but they typically switch each war - and hop over to the losing side if they are on a losing streak
I think it's not big because nobody tells you what to do Nobody Everything is based on people Most people don't want to care at all You can just not shoot enemies, because it gives you nothing The only progression is through commends, so people just get lost It's a nieche game Not Call of Duty, not World of Tanks, not Euro Truck sim It's Foxhole and there's nothing like it
Don't have "winning factions", duh. All issues come from balance pendulum swinging every few wars, and not from veteran players deciding for some reason to "enjoy" 60+ second respawn timers on a "winning" side. This is why i don't think some artificial faction locks should exist either. Good clans are good because they know equipment from both sides. Know strengths and weaknesses and what tactics the enemy would probably use. Rank system can be misleading in some cases and i would like devs to look at it. But in all hours of playing the game ive only got fooled by it 2 or three times. Usually with hardcore logy player trying expensive combat vehicle, while having very little understanding what to do with it. But hey, they grinded for it, it's their right. In 99% of other cases rank is still a very nice way to quickly gauge experience on the frontline.
Never said anything about respawn timers, faction locks or anything like that. I suggest you rewatch because that's way off. But if you really believe wars are won or lost simply because of the power swing, you are wrong. But thanks for the comment :)
Biggest turn off to me for this game was the AI bunkers. Join a map, click an area, run forward and just die to an AI bunker. You really need to be apart of a group to get something out of this game.
I disagree. Without them it would require a permanent defending force of players, and given that they cant really put many players to offset that, and the fact that people play to have fun, not sit at a defending post for 8 hours a day, it would be a horrible turnoff for 99.99% of the player base. Plus, there are so many ways to deal with them it makes perfect sense. from mammon rushing, tanks, ballista's, even shoulder rocket launchers. For gameplay purposes, it is vital. Or would you volunteer to sit in a bunker 8 hours a day in case someone came along and attacked them? Because that's what you are asking the other players to do...
@@TheOnlySillySocks The problem is your response to dealing with something that sucks as a new player is to highlight how something would suck even more it wasnt that way. The point is if you're a new player, join a random part of the map without much going on and each side has their bunkers set up you;re going to have a terrible first time. which is going to be a lot of new players.
I'm just going to reply that you are a soldier, in a war. you are not meant to be off somewhere alone trying to win the war by yourself... It's a war game, not cod...
Oh hell no, you shouldn't buy the game, it is lacking in many many aspect specially in the fun department, 90% of it is mind numbing boring gameplay and the "fun" part is mediocre
@@captainkirk1945 "working hard" aka spend hours in a monotonous loop, pressing lmb. There is no other Game that doesnt respect your time quite like foxhole and their devs
I really couldn't disagree more. Even a single delivery of a truckful of bmats can change the momentum of a battle. There are many activities for many types of players, and for every one in the back doing gods work, their effort is very appreciated by everyone in the front lines. It's all about what you like or want to do. And to be fair, if you don't use an auto clicker, you should :) Mouse lives matter xD
@@TheOnlySillySocks wow bmats, what a fun item to make and to use!!! I love repairing My TH for hours it's so much fun. The Game rest upon the shoulders of people who don't have anything else to do but waste hours in a boring gameplay loop, because it's boring as fuck to make a T3 full concrete base, literally not Even builders like to build, and if they Say they do it's because they are masochist
We are all very sorry 95% of war is boring and necessary. If the folks that started waging wars back in the day only made it fun. I said game had something for everyone. If that's what you decide to do, why blame the devs over something you chose to do? You are either dedicated to the war effort and do what must be done, or you go and only do things you enjoy because that's all you want to do. Go fight, play anti tank or in a tank, go do something else instead of grudgingly doing things you don't like and then complain about it. The game has more exciting things, go do those! XD P.S: I would ask if you can even imagine a game that doesn't have a single thing someone out there might consider boring but at this point I just don't care. No one is forcing you to do something you don't want to, so yeah, have a nice day.
Going to throw this suggestion out to anyone who enjoys this game. Foxhole is to military games, what Project Zomboid is to zombie/survival games. Both isometric, and greatly detailed.
Just realized I was the battle tank (juggernaut) in alot of your background footage lol. Great video keep it up o7.
Logistics front line sounds pretty awesome. Bus people around sort of thing. Communicate friendly with players and drop them off to fight. Then drive back and do it again.
Or maybe transfer materials idk. But mostly the olayer interaction sounds fun. Long drives too from one depot to another. I assume that’s a thing
Yesterday while driving a tank for 11 hours I had over 10 different people help me crew it. You meet new people all the time and can have great moments with them if you want.
I have no idea what you were talking about for most of that video, Probably because ive never played the game lol. But it gets a like from me just because I can see the effort thats gone into it. Great vid mate keep em coming.
5:14 There is a reason , why it should stay where it stands.
Commends and ranks are just carrot for those who doing dirty job. Logi is obligatory aspect of game , you can't do anything without logi.
If clan doing logi, it provides itself for combat content.
Who will provide provide public fronts with equipment ? if logi will waste their time and don't get anything back after some point, fronts will fight with pistols.
Those ,who say that the logistical aspect of the game is interesting are just growers of new logi players. They preparing new logi to decrease their time, spented on this endless grind .
And if someone will do extra bmats trip for those 3 commends, fine. Rank is just carrot on fishing rod , for logi horses , which pulling war machine.
TBH best way to farm commends is to lead clan activities. When you have 25+ people in discord and after you achive your goal everyone max commend each other is much more effetive. But once you hit mid rank, you don't really care about your rank anymore. Commends are dust . Those who ask for them are pitiful because they are still chasing carrots on a fishing rod.
Sad ,that they don't have such system for good building. You can't commend person who builded and maintained really good defences. Because they usually offline or in another region.
Also you suggesting kpi, but how to measure kpi for spotter of artillery , or tank driver , or organisation of something?
The KPI of many roles can only be evaluated by other players. This is the current system.
And nothing still prevents you from just logging into the game with your friends every day and commend each other.
TLDR . Commends and ranks are here to compensate lack of fun in sertain aspects of game.
Either didnt watch the video or I really cant tell what you are on about. So builders dont deserve commends? people that spend a full day repairing dont deserve commends? scroopers? folks managing facilities, other logi than frontline logi? In your opinion, only people that do frontline logi should get notifications for commends? Really? That's really ungratefull of you. Is that what you do when you play? just farm commends on logi?
Artilery, tanks other group activities are easy to manage. All xp gained by the squad should be shared by the squad... Next question?
And By the way if you actually watched the video, you would hear me say it's exactly because commends are nonsense and meaningless now that they need to change... TO HAVE IMPORTANCE AND MEANING...
I swear, some folks just read the first sentence of a book and leave a review criticizing it was not a good book...
Love the effort put into the video!
I am really looking forward to getting foxhole one day, and it’s nice to see people praising it while also giving good constructive criticism to improve it.
Please do a review of Elite Dangerous / Star Citizen! I really want to see how you think those games could improve, especially elite as it is a very expansive game with a dying player base.
I love this game! Have played it a bunch. My only problem with it is that there is a strong Minority of players, usually Regi members, who treat other players disrespectfully, bossing them around and making the gameplay experience hostile and unwelcomeing, if the goal is for the game to grow and thrive, then let other players enjoy themselves, and dont take it TOO seriously. Thats just my 5 cents worth
hmm you do realize the win rate on able is 55 to 52 right ? its almost 50/50 in my experience most regiments do stay their faction 95% of the time and if they switch they switch mostly because their own side shits on them . and the next wars colonial will most likely catch up again, their tanks got massive buffs . i do agree with your rank suggestion. i am a logi brig tho i do backline to midline frontline seaport logistics bringign in bulk material by freighters . i dont ask for commends i just get them, since i put my stuff in public so anyone can get it and supply frontline bunkers . i dont do that for comments lol . the biggest issue is that the servers poop out when more than 6k in totla play at the same time
In regards to the overall score, it's a bit irrelevant since most of the time there are streaks, some quite impressive. I would attribute those streaks to a variety of things, buffs or nerfs to the factions, but the amount and quality of regiments. And from my perspective, Organization on the battlefield is a major factor for winning, because the more organized and managed faction can take lesser assets and still churn out wins. This has varied and the overall count of victories is pretty much a tie, but, the presence of very long streaks speaks to something else. In my opinion, the presence and quality of numerous and organized regiments.
Yeah the servers need a boost. I would much prefer they focus on that and increasing the player count than making more shards.
@@TheOnlySillySocks well from what i see the latest wars go quit the same , collonials make gains in the early war , stalemate in mid war, than warden push back . i think its more a burn out thing on colli side lately . i mean MSA stood 8 time in arti range of Weathered halls and couldnt capitalize on it and take it . i was playing warden last war so 108 . when i logged off i was like okey this time its done for and the east will fall. but they capitialize on their gains in asian time and got pushed back in EU 8 times . same with fox catcher .
for the organization its leess , that wardens are more organized. we just help eachother more . people fromt he west front go east and vice versa . whiel collonials still clign to their coalition thing and hate eahc other as it seems ( this is just speculation from my side , from what i heared )
Yeah but that's exactly the point. If colonials keep getting most of the noobs late war like they have recently, because regiments leave, how are they going to organize anything to last? It's all about morale and if regiments aren't incentivized to stick around to the end, even when taking loses, vets leave and its just noobs. There needs to be something in play to incentivize those that tough it out to the end. Both vets and full regiments. People love bragging rights and giving loyal and persistent players and regiments rewards is the only way. I dont agree with just penalizing players to force them, I believe in clear and balanced incentives.
So even if wardens where less organized, the fact players can leave or switch shards is bad for the gameplay, but necessary. Therefore incentives is the way to go.
@@TheOnlySillySocks they dont get more noobs late war , how do you come to that conclusion ? MSA was unable to capitalize on their tech advantage and got their teeth kicked in when it evened out . i never said anything about penelties O.o you cannot switch during a war and not allowing switches when you get bullied by your own side makes no sense .
if you force people to stay on a side evn tho they dotn want to play there anymore for what ever reason they just stop playing at all .
in all most every war wardens have more cassulaties. maybe wardens are just more tenacious and dotn give up
Right because the Germans got more casualties in WWII then the allies because they were tenacious, didn't give up and won at the end? If you are taking casualties into account the only correlation is, if a side takes more, and wins, it means their logistics where miles better to support that level of aggression and sacrifice. That's it. Factions have won with more and with less casualties.
By the end of any war, the side that's losing always has more noobs on the front lines than the winning side. Maybe you don't know this because you don't fight that much and that's ok. the backlines always need more people. By the end of this last war, Colonials where over 95% lower ranks that Sergeants on the frontlines. Even some of the higher ranks where probably logi players that just wanted to get some action, and ended up making some huge mistakes. When one side begins to lose, regiments lose their bases and leave, it happens all the time. Most of the experienced players in logi leave if they lose their facility they worked to build. It's always a snow ball.
You confused "review" with "suggestions"
I gave my opinion on it, both good and bad, so review. however, there are some suggestions in there :)
Best Game Ever
this is amazing. they need to allow mods so we can have a zombie apocalypse in this engine!!!
Talking about the regiment reward system, I think this could get very overwhelming for the game.
The only thing I can really accept would be something like, regiments that stay over multiple wars or through out an entire war, or what ever. They get rewarded through some point system and the top 4 or 8 regiments(thinking about limiting network data needed to be transferred) at any time get their own arm bands or decals for example. Custom hat decals could also be cool.
Custom reward systems that affect gameplay feels like it will just be cheesed to where everyone will combine into a few big regiments so that everyone gets the reward.
Well that's exactly what I said. A regimental flag, uniforms etc is all visual skins. Everything balanced and not game play related.
I keep forgetting that they are called Colonials and not Collies
I think I have 1000+ hours - great game - nothing else like it.
I SAW MYSELF IN WORLD CHAT ON RUclips IM GOING TO BE FAMOUS!!
don't forget your "friends" when you do xD
@@TheOnlySillySocks who needs friends when you can scroop all day :)
wish this was 3rd person, like Helldivers 2
Good suggestion. They need to make this but modern style
@@Onyx1776 'modern style' is decades old and played out, dude
i really dont think that factionhopping is sucha big problem. all of the big regiments are loyal to their faction and once you have played as a faction for a few minutes you are locked to that faction for that war on that shard. You would have to use an alternate account to "factionhop" and the devs issue quite frequent permabans for people who are cought "alting" to sabotage
I didnt say all regs/vets do it. I said some have done it because it's allowed. And it should be, but the problem is there nonetheless. That's why I suggested rewarding loyalty and persistence as exemplified by the loyalty bonus conditions suggested for regiments that though it out. A clear example of the problem was the 3 shard period where 1 was basically for warden exp reg, one for colonial vets, and the third for newbies overall. Also, when I say vets leave a war, it includes people that stop playing, like I explained in the video. I never said the vets only change shards when losing, I said they leave when losing. There are many examples of full regiments that leave as soon as their main base is gone, and wait for the next war. But this video was for everyone. If I anticipated every way people could misunderstand anything I said on the video, it would an hour long, and most people that don't understand the game would not like it. However, not recognizing multiple shards are a problem because it allows people to switch wars when losing, both regiments and/or vets, is disingenuous. The fact that is a possibility means some have/will do it.
I didnt mention alting because its a known problem equivalent to cheating imo and that's for the devs to tackle, and they already know it.
agree with some things but completely disagree with the regiment loyalty thing. Players should not be penalised for playing the other half of the game they bought
I never said anything about penalising any players. I said reward loyalty. The complete opposite. But thanks for the comment. Always helps :)
@@TheOnlySillySocks rewarding regiments that stay on one side means regiments that dont will not have access to the rewards, so basically they are missing out because of the way they choose to play the game. Honestly the amount of regiments that actually switch sides between wars is very, very small. I agree that vetstacking is a problem in this game, but its more of a "players migrate to the winning faction" problem rather than a "whole regiments switch sides" problem, and the root of that is the devs extremely erratic balancing decisions, or one side getting extremely burnt out from multiple win streaks
Well yes, that's the point. Those that fight for the whole war and dedicate themselves to a faction should be rewarded imo. It could be stuff that doesn't have an effect on the fight, but something that reinforces the value of dedication. I do agree with the rest but I'm not getting into balancing issues. They exist, but, depending on peoples favourite faction, it's a very angry subject xD
@@kostasprince6725 Infact I can only really think of one Regi that switches sides often - that been 1stFA - (Duri's Regi) but they typically switch each war - and hop over to the losing side if they are on a losing streak
@@personthing88 its not the only regi, noot coalition, caf and others do the same
I think it's not big because nobody tells you what to do
Nobody
Everything is based on people
Most people don't want to care at all
You can just not shoot enemies, because it gives you nothing
The only progression is through commends, so people just get lost
It's a nieche game
Not Call of Duty, not World of Tanks, not Euro Truck sim
It's Foxhole
and there's nothing like it
#PUSHWITHCOMMENT
Don't have "winning factions", duh.
All issues come from balance pendulum swinging every few wars, and not from veteran players deciding for some reason to "enjoy" 60+ second respawn timers on a "winning" side.
This is why i don't think some artificial faction locks should exist either. Good clans are good because they know equipment from both sides. Know strengths and weaknesses and what tactics the enemy would probably use.
Rank system can be misleading in some cases and i would like devs to look at it. But in all hours of playing the game ive only got fooled by it 2 or three times. Usually with hardcore logy player trying expensive combat vehicle, while having very little understanding what to do with it. But hey, they grinded for it, it's their right.
In 99% of other cases rank is still a very nice way to quickly gauge experience on the frontline.
Never said anything about respawn timers, faction locks or anything like that. I suggest you rewatch because that's way off. But if you really believe wars are won or lost simply because of the power swing, you are wrong. But thanks for the comment :)
Promo*SM
Biggest turn off to me for this game was the AI bunkers. Join a map, click an area, run forward and just die to an AI bunker. You really need to be apart of a group to get something out of this game.
I disagree. Without them it would require a permanent defending force of players, and given that they cant really put many players to offset that, and the fact that people play to have fun, not sit at a defending post for 8 hours a day, it would be a horrible turnoff for 99.99% of the player base. Plus, there are so many ways to deal with them it makes perfect sense. from mammon rushing, tanks, ballista's, even shoulder rocket launchers. For gameplay purposes, it is vital. Or would you volunteer to sit in a bunker 8 hours a day in case someone came along and attacked them? Because that's what you are asking the other players to do...
@@TheOnlySillySocks The problem is your response to dealing with something that sucks as a new player is to highlight how something would suck even more it wasnt that way. The point is if you're a new player, join a random part of the map without much going on and each side has their bunkers set up you;re going to have a terrible first time. which is going to be a lot of new players.
I'm just going to reply that you are a soldier, in a war. you are not meant to be off somewhere alone trying to win the war by yourself... It's a war game, not cod...
@@mcb4067 don't worry any day now the devs are going to update the tutorial just You wait
Oh hell no, you shouldn't buy the game, it is lacking in many many aspect specially in the fun department, 90% of it is mind numbing boring gameplay and the "fun" part is mediocre
It’s really dependent on hard work tbh, you work hard you can use huge fun weapons
@@captainkirk1945 "working hard" aka spend hours in a monotonous loop, pressing lmb.
There is no other Game that doesnt respect your time quite like foxhole and their devs
I really couldn't disagree more. Even a single delivery of a truckful of bmats can change the momentum of a battle. There are many activities for many types of players, and for every one in the back doing gods work, their effort is very appreciated by everyone in the front lines. It's all about what you like or want to do. And to be fair, if you don't use an auto clicker, you should :) Mouse lives matter xD
@@TheOnlySillySocks wow bmats, what a fun item to make and to use!!! I love repairing My TH for hours it's so much fun. The Game rest upon the shoulders of people who don't have anything else to do but waste hours in a boring gameplay loop, because it's boring as fuck to make a T3 full concrete base, literally not Even builders like to build, and if they Say they do it's because they are masochist
We are all very sorry 95% of war is boring and necessary. If the folks that started waging wars back in the day only made it fun. I said game had something for everyone. If that's what you decide to do, why blame the devs over something you chose to do? You are either dedicated to the war effort and do what must be done, or you go and only do things you enjoy because that's all you want to do. Go fight, play anti tank or in a tank, go do something else instead of grudgingly doing things you don't like and then complain about it. The game has more exciting things, go do those! XD P.S: I would ask if you can even imagine a game that doesn't have a single thing someone out there might consider boring but at this point I just don't care. No one is forcing you to do something you don't want to, so yeah, have a nice day.